Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
June 17, 2009
Links June 17 09
Comments

Regarding the Hezbollah story, could it be they were simply returning the favour?
(no I am not serious)

Posted by: Ash | Jun 17 2009 6:50 utc | 1

Oh all right then. some english bloke by the name of mark steel has written a reasonably amusing column for the indy entitled Why not hold all trials in private?
subtitled They’d have put Cherie Blair on the inquiry, only she’d have charged a fee
One of the dreadful brown’s concessions to the limpid left wing of england’s labour party, in return for left faction support against the rightist Bliarite faction’s attempted coup last week, was to give in on the left faction’s perennial request to have an official enquiry into the reasons why/how england decided to participate in the illegal invasion of Iraq.
Brown prolly thought that digging this up would smear at least some of the greedier (than him but only marginally) little twerps who consider themselves bliarites. Of course since brown & Co’s fingerprints can also be found on some of the decisions that such an invasion would not be a breach of international law (that despite the fact that the invasion was one of the more egregious breaches of national sovereignty since WW2), brown has announced that the “Inquiry into the causes of the Iraq invasion” be held in private.
Some findings may be made public but none of the evidence that led to those findings may.
A thoroughly pointless and wasteful exercise especially since as Steel says:

In an effort to represent the expertise of many layers of society, the team running the inquiry has been drawn from a wide cross-section of knights. (To be fair only four out of the five in the team are knights. The other is a baroness, because New Labour stands by its slogan, “For the many not the few”).
They’re not even neutral knights, because Sir Lawrence Freedman wrote a memo on which Blair based a speech proposing war, and Sir Martin Gilbert has already said Blair and Bush may be seen as “akin to Roosevelt and Churchill.” So why are they bothering to have an inquiry at all? It would make more sense to have a dinner party. Then they could release its conclusions that: 1) There was little alternative to war; 2) The recession is creating some wonderful opportunities for property in Italy; and 3) Sir John and Sir Roderic both knew the same masters at Eton, isn’t that amazing?

The least amazing, most predictable scene in the farce is the one where the labour left faction doesn’t find any fault at all in the privacy of the inquiry or it’s rather ‘predetermined’ commissioners.
More trade-offs no doubt, the bollinger bolsheviks will have traded off some other “non negotiable position” in return for their silence on the circus they have made of the protests of those englanders who really did care about the fate of Joe Iraqi.
Ain’t democracy grand!

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jun 17 2009 7:10 utc | 2

Overhearing Arabic-speaking riot police might not be completely false. It could well be that the individuals mentioned come from Iran’s western province of Khuzestan, near the Iraq border, where many people have Arabic as a first language – although they can no doubt speak Persian, they may prefer to revert to Arabic under a stressful situation or even to prevent the protesters from understanding what they’re saying.

Posted by: Ash | Jun 17 2009 8:08 utc | 3

@Change_for_Iran gave minute by minute updates of when the student dorms were attacked. All of it ended up being true. 5 of his schoolmates died. Please don’t comment on things you know nothing about.

Posted by: o | Jun 17 2009 8:18 utc | 4

http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/10385

Posted by: o | Jun 17 2009 8:42 utc | 5

All of it ended up being true.
And you would know this…how, exactly?

Posted by: china_hand2 | Jun 17 2009 8:52 utc | 6

The American Empire Is Bankrupt Yawazaha, yawazaha, yawazaha, they shoot horses don’t they?

Posted by: anna missed | Jun 17 2009 9:46 utc | 7

Interesting. I hardly even noticed that there were prodemocracy protests in Georgia and the police were beating them. Isn’t President Obama concerned about them too?

Posted by: Lysander | Jun 17 2009 12:16 utc | 8

@7 I wish Hudson was right but he’s always been prodigiously befuddled. If the Chinese could substitute Eurasian markets for US markets, then Hudson’s end is near, but China’s development model is too dependent on the US market, which is still big as hell even as it slumps. Making a bloc of these economies is good for them but not necessarily bad for the US. Europe made a currency bloc out of a much bigger market and see how it crushed the dollar… oh, uh, wait.

Posted by: …—… | Jun 17 2009 12:29 utc | 9

Sundat Times:
Oceans charge up new theory of magnetism

Earth’s magnetic field, long thought to be generated by molten metals swirling around its core, may instead be produced by ocean currents, according to controversial new research published this week.
……
Ryskin approached the problem differently, by looking at the way Earth’s magnetic field undergoes constant changes, growing stronger in some regions and weaker in others. This phenomenon, known as variation, also sees gradual shifts in the locations of the north and south magnetic poles.
Scientists have always linked variation with turbulence in the outer core, but Ryskin suggests it actually correlates with changes in ocean circulation. In the north Atlantic, for example, changes in the strength of currents were matched by sharp changes in magnetic fields.
One idea is that changes in ocean circulation may explain the curious reversals shown by Earth’s magnetic field, in which the north and south magnetic poles suddenly flip over. This last happened 780,000 years ago.
This could also be linked to tectonic plate movements that have shifted the world’s land masses around the globe, forcing ocean currents to adopt entirely new routes.
If Ryskin is right, then climate change, predicted to alter the strength and course of ocean currents, could also alter the planet’s magnetic field.

Posted by: plushtown | Jun 17 2009 12:57 utc | 10

@Lysander – I hardly even noticed that there were prodemocracy protests in Georgia ..
Those are running for two month now and Saakashvili is trying to suppress them just as long. Usually some shock troops single out demonstrators and beat them up. The official news hardly ever reports on the demonstrations and police attacks. The opposition TV was pressed and at a time its studios ransacked. The opposition does its best to not use violence at all.
In the recent days Saakashvili’s methods are getting worse: Opposition Alliance Reports on Arrest of its Activists

An opposition Alliance for Georgia said on June 17, that ten of its activists had been arrested in last few days in various parts of Georgia mainly with charges related to illegal possession of firearms and one with drug-related crime.
The Alliance, which unites New Rights Party, Republican Party and a political team of Irakli Alasania, said that apart of Tbilisi, arrests were conducted in Gori, Lanchkuti, Chokhatauri, Chiatura, Tkibuli and Adigeni. According to the Republican Party most of the arrested persons are its activists.
In a written statement on June 17, Irakli Alasania, leader of Alliance for Georgia, who currently visits the U.S., said that the June 15 “violent crackdown” on the peaceful protesters and beating of Zurab Abashidze, his close ally, outside the Tbilisi police headquarters “has to be assessed as the terror attack on politicians having different points of view.”
He said that the trend “indicates that the authorities have chosen violent 7 November 2007 path for resolving of the acute political crisis.”
“This is the road to inevitable civil confrontation, the responsibility for which has to be fully borne personally by Mikheil Saakashvili,” Alasania said. “We consider the numerous violent acts by the authorities as their response to our multiple calls to urgently start the dialogue to resolve the current political crisis.”
Meanwhile, the opposition Conservative Party said in a statement on June 17, that total of 20 opposition activists have been arrested over various criminal charges and 10 – in connection with various administrative offenses since the launch of street protest rallies on April 9. It also said that over 100 cases of assaults on opposition activists and supporters were registered by various human rights groups and opposition parties since the launch of the protests with none of them being investigated by the police.

Posted by: b | Jun 17 2009 13:39 utc | 11

But Georgia is of course a “western” ally, Saakashvili a Washington tool and protests there are not of interest.

Posted by: b | Jun 17 2009 13:41 utc | 12

no 9 – the dollar going down basically means the US should be able at one stage to be competitive enough to export, however will find it very expensive to import.
so China has an interest for a strong dollar, to achieve that they are forced to save the dollar, as spending it will devalue it.
there is a tipping point in this however, where China exports for less it gains, and I guess by printing dollars the US has finally reached it.
the US is not the only market out there, and other traders are prepared to pay more than green paper.

Posted by: outsider | Jun 17 2009 14:09 utc | 13

and oh there is another tipping point, when the US makes themselves a nuisance in AfPak.

Posted by: outsider | Jun 17 2009 14:15 utc | 14

Torture, Psychology, and Daniel Inouye
The True Story Behind Psychology’s Role in Torture?

A seventeen-year-old boy is locked in an interrogation cell in Guantanamo. He breaks down crying and says he wants his family. The interrogator senses the boy is psychologically vulnerable and consults with a psychologist. The psychologist has evaluated the boy prior to the questioning and says, “Tell him his family has forgotten him.” The psychologist also prescribes “linguistic isolation” (not letting him have contact with anyone who speaks his language.) The boy attempts suicide a few weeks later. On the eve of the boy’s trial, the psychologist apparently fearing her testimony will only further implicate her, indicates she will plead the Fifth Amendment if she is called to the stand. The trial is postponed, leaving the boy in further limbo.
The military psychologist is merely a foot soldier in psychology’s participation in torture. It goes much deeper. We now know that psychologists helped design and implement significant segments of George Bush’s torture program. Despite their credo, “Above all, do no harm,” two psychologists developed instruments of psychological torture. They “reversed engineered” psychological principles. They used the very therapeutic interventions psychologists use to ameliorate psychological suffering, but “reversed” their direction to create psychological distress and instability. If one’s reality sense is threatened, a good therapist validates and supports it as appropriate. In reverse engineering, the environment is deliberately made more confusing and the victim’s trust in his own perceptions is intentionally undermined. In extreme form, this can ultimately drive a person to insanity from which some never come back. These were the types of techniques that were used on the seventeen-year-old detainee and others.
Military psychologists also colluded with the Justice Department to help CIA operatives circumvent the legal prohibitions against torture. Under the Justice Department definition of torture, if a detainee was sent to a psychologist for a mental health evaluation prior to interrogation it was per se evidence that the interrogator had no legal intent to torture the detainee because the referral “demonstrated concern” for the welfare of the detainee.
Most remarkably of all, this whole process occurred under a protective “ethical” seal from the American Psychological Association (APA), psychologists’ largest national organization. The APA governance repeatedly rejected calls from its membership for APA to join other health organizations in declaring participation in Bush detention center interrogations unethical.
Most psychologists are appalled at what the APA has done, and many, like me, have resigned from the APA. But the true story behind APA’s involvement with torture has not been fully told.

One can only hope that the increasingly empty stores can become meeting centers for the upcoming populist revolt.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 17 2009 14:25 utc | 15

Would someone here please explain to me why Iranian intelligence officials aren’t blocking Twitter while they are blocking all other forms of social networking sites? Is it because they believe that Twitter is too insignificant as a networking site for them to put forth the effort to block it? Or, is it because Twitter is designed in such a way that it’s too hard for them to block it without causing other sites they don’t want blocked to become blocked?

Posted by: Cynthia | Jun 17 2009 14:32 utc | 16

no 9 – the dollar going down basically means the US should be able at one stage to be competitive enough to export, however will find it very expensive to import.
Besides guns and debt, what does the U.S. have left to export?
It’s a myth that the Chinese need the U.S; the Chinese need access to markets where they can sell their wares. The U.S. has, for the last two decades, been the most convenient one, but with the current economic conditions that’s no longer true.
The Chinese can take a hit in their economic growth — a fall from 8-10% annually to 3-6%? Big deal. A falloff in production will, for them, translate into an opportunity to develop domestic markets badly in need of attention, during which time they’ll be able to build up R&D on basic goods and technology that will be extremely attractive to other developing markets (Africa, S/Central America, Central Asia, etc), as well as to economic superpowers like India and Russia.
Don’t believe the hype: the U.S. need the Chinese far more than the Chinese need the U.S. Think about it: if it weren’t true, then why is the U.S. fighting so hard to drive a wedge between Pakistan, Iran, and China?

Posted by: china_hand2 | Jun 17 2009 16:45 utc | 17

@cyntia – Would someone here please explain to me why Iranian intelligence officials aren’t blocking Twitter while they are blocking all other forms of social networking sites?
I guess because only very few real people from Iran are twittering or reading it at all. Those who do know how to use proxies to get there. There is no way to tell if twits from “Iran” are indeed from Iran. See the first link above.

Posted by: b | Jun 17 2009 16:56 utc | 18

anyone else catch that comment in the charting stock’s link, dated “June 16th, 2009 at 5:02 am” from someone named “Ali” who writes, in part, “to the author of this bs article : i am from iran and i want to tell you, you have no idea what is happening here so you better shut-up … the election result was totally fabricated by the Ahmadinejad and his government… … we can not tolerate 4 more years of ahmadinejad’s retardedness and tyranny. we voted to take his power but they changed and faked the result. i hope you apologize to these people for accuseing them…Also check my ip if you doubt im from Iran, douchebag.”
sound like the same ‘ali’ who posted here recently before making up an excuse to sign off?

Posted by: b real | Jun 17 2009 17:54 utc | 19

@17 China’s been swinging like Tarzan, swinging on the mercantilist vine with the US as its immiserated comprador economy. That vine broke and the big question is, can they grab another vine? Turning their investment to domestic needs will not go smoothly. Their surplus could be used to ease the pain of adjustment – at least to the point where private investors catch on and start front-running China’s disposition of reserves. The transition could work if it is very, very gradual and slow, but all those rustics sleeping under bridges in Guangdong, how patient are they going to be? 8% to 3% still hurts. The sharp deceleration hurts more than the lower plateau. A rocky adjustment is fine by me, I concur that China’s role in the world will weather the shock better than America’s will.

Posted by: …—… | Jun 17 2009 17:58 utc | 20

i don’t think i saw these posted here yet, but they could fit in w/ the story about foggy bottom intervening in twitter’s maintenance window to keep the site active
Iranian opposition launches organized cyber attack against pro-Ahmadinejad sites

Through a combination of DIY (do it yourself) denial of service attack tools (DDoS), multiple iFrame loading scripts, public web page “refresher” tool, and a much more effective PHP script, the participants have already prompted some of the major Iranian outlets to switch to “lite” versions of their sites in an attempt to mitigate the attack.
Let’s assess this very latest example of people’s information warfare concept, find out which sites remain affected, and discuss the attack tools used:
The campaign appears to have been organized through Twitter, which despite public reports that the site has been banned in Iran, appears to be still accessible through a a persistent supply of proxy servers on behalf of the opposition.
Moreover, the ongoing distributed denial of service attacks, are using techniques which greatly resemble those used in last year’s Russia vs Georgia cyber attack, and the ones Chinese hacktivists used back in 2008 in order to temporarily shut down CNN, with a single exception – there’s no indication of a botnet involvement in the present attack.
Instead, the attack relies on the so called people’s information warfare concept, which is the self-mobilization of individuals, or their recruitment based on political/nationalistic sentiments by a third-party, for conducting various hacktivism activities such as web site defacements, or launching distributed denial of service attacks.

Iranian Opposition DDoS-es pro-Ahmadinejad Sites

So far, their rather simplistic denial of service tools has managed to disrupt access to key government web sites, and the intensity of the attacks is prone to increase since the opposition appears to be in a “learning mode”.
What does “learning mode” stand for here? It’s their current stage of experimentation clearly indicating their inexperience with such campaigns and DDoS attacks in general. The opposition’s de-centralized chain of command isn’t even speculating on the use of botnets, since the primitive multi-threaded Iranian connections hitting Iranian sites seems to achieve their effect.

What has changed since yesterday’s real-time OSINT analysis? The web based “Page Rebooter” tool heavily advertised by the opposition has decided to stop offering the service due to the massive abuse:

Meanwhile, the opposition has come up with a segmented targets list including hardline news portals, official Ahmadinejad sites, Iranian law enforcement sites, banks, judiciary and transportation sites, aiming to recruit international supporters:

“ALL PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD:
Please help us in a full-scale cyberwar againts the dictatorial brutal government of Ahmadinjead! Help Iranians to earn back their votes per instructions below:
Simply click on few of the following links (better too choose your selections from different categories); it opens the site in a new tab. It will not stop you from browsing but by sending a refresh signal to the target site will saturate it. By doing so, we can block Ahmadinjead’s governments flow of information in many of its key components as shown below. Please help us and yourself from this lunatic who will push the world to world war III.”

Following the updated list of targets, a new LOIC.exe DoS tool is being advertised. The tool is however, anything but sophisticated (it’s been around since 6 Jul 2008) compared to even the average Russian DDoS bot. Combined, the simplistic nature of the opposition’s attack tools indicates the lack of any in-depth understanding of information warfare principles, in times when other countries are already going beyond cyber warfare and aiming for the unrestricted warfare stage.

Posted by: b real | Jun 17 2009 18:35 utc | 21

no b, for slothrop we are wrong again because the saak of sin is a heroic leader fighting russian tyranny, in fact like their brother ukrainians they are the modern heros – who represent a super sort of socialism that seems to exist seulement in the head of our dear slothrop. & hell these people demanding freedom in georgia are just lumpenproletarians of no merit who prefer vodka to verité
it seems for sloth we deeply misunderstand the way of the world

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 17 2009 18:50 utc | 22

@20:
Yeah, sure — it’ll hurt.
But by building domestic demand, the pressure presented by all those peasants moving to teh city to look for work will be eased.
China’s already latched on to several vines:
Iran. Pakistan. Somalia. Sudan. Central Asia.
See a pattern, here?

Posted by: china_hand2 | Jun 18 2009 2:22 utc | 23

china_hand2 @23
china + somalia? how so? there were efforts to secure oil deals w/ yusuf’s transitional regime two years ago, but, like TFG rule itself, that never materialized.
other than the historic move of china sending warships to the somali coast to avoid getting left out of that aspect of the scramble, as well as to protect its fishing fleets, and the chinese govt giving money & political support to AMISOM forces protecting the latest installed transitional govt, which is more popular outside than in somalia itself, they don’t seem to have any current policy or relations in that country that i have come across which set it up for anything.
are you implying that china is involved somehow w/ the islamist mvmts in somalia?

Posted by: b real | Jun 18 2009 4:27 utc | 24

No. I’m not saying China’s involved with the Islamist movements, and i don’t have much evidence to back up any assertion that China’s got much of any influence, there.
What i do think, though, is that what’s happening in Somalia is evolving into an extension of what’s happening in Sudan.
I see the Horn as an area where US/UK influence is under direct challenge — particularly since the GWOT began — and it’s the only area in Northern black-Africa where the US has strong foreign influence. Uganda and Kenya are still solidly within the US sphere, but the oil revenues of Sudan, Chad, and other areas threaten to break that region open in the same way it did for Venezuela, Iran and Brazil.
So China already has a relatively strong foothold in Sudan, and Sudan is the closest thing to an independent, local, nativist “ally” Somalia has. Every other nation around either takes its orders from the US/UK, is Arab, or is an enemy. So while the relationship with China is indirect, i think it’s growing apace and is an increasing worry for the U.S.
But beyond that: no. That was a half-assed slip. There’s any one of a number of other African nations i should’ve put in its place.

Posted by: china_hand2 | Jun 18 2009 5:49 utc | 25

They’re in W. Africa too, and hen hau for them. I salute my future Chinese overlords.

Posted by: …—… | Jun 18 2009 18:52 utc | 26