Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 14, 2009
White Phosphorus Lies

Two days ago the U.S. military again denied the use of white phosphorus grenades in directly targeting enemy positions in Afghanistan. In today's NYT, a reporter embedded with U.S. front troops again confirms such use.

Last week the U.S. military bombed some compounds in Farah, Afghanistan, and killed over 140 civilians, 95 of which were probably children. Like usual the military first denied civilian casualties but later, after the International Red Cross' findings supported the local reports, had to confirm them. Local doctors in Herat say at least 14 victims of that attack in their care have unusal burn wounds and accuse the U.S. of using white phosphorus in the bombing. In another case a girl currently in U.S. care at Bagram was confirmed to have been burned by white phosphorus.

The U.S. denies any use of white phosphorus grenades and bombs in direct combat and in turn accuses the Taliban of having used WP. That I find laughable. While the Taliban may use old WP grenades from somewhere to prepare IED's it is very unlikely that they would use them in direct fighting. A Taliban spokesperson denied any use of WP by them.

The U.S. military claims that it only uses WP to generate smoke or for illuminating:

Major Willis confirmed that the US and Nato’s International Security Assistance Force used white phosphorus in Afghanistan but never as an anti-personnel weapon. “That’s not allowed under the terms of international law,” she said.

White phosphorus, she said, was only used for marking targets, screening troops from enemy positions, illuminating areas, destroying unoccupied bunkers and buildings and “for igniting enemy ammunition or petroleum production”.

But while not one independent report can be found of Taliban use of WP, the U.S. military has used such in direct combat as anti-personel weapon has been documented in Fallujah, Iraq, and also in Afghanistan.

Just open today's NYT and read C. J. Chivers report from the Korangal valley where the U.S. military for whatever reason is fighting local timber-smugglers:

After the ceremony, the violence resumed. The soldiers detected a Taliban spotter on a ridge, which was pounded with mortars and then white phosphorus rounds from a 155-millimeter howitzer.

Another Chivers NYT report from mid April also documents the U.S. use of white phosphor rounds in direct targeting of enemy positions in the Korangal valley.

By continuously lying about its use of chemical weapons, by seizing farmland and destroying ancient water-systems the U.S. is each day creating more and more enemies in Afghanistan.

Even the U.S. commander says that al-Qaeda is no longer operating in Afghanistan. What again is then the purpose of all that killing there?

Comments

I don’t understand the controversy, in Vietnam WP was standard issue armaments, used ubiquitously as primarily a weapon to destroy civilian infrastructure. Its military/combat utility being negligible, it was used as a counterinsurgency weapon against civilian complicity to the insurgency. I’m unaware of any changes to this policy in the current occupation wars. A patrol goes into a village, gets ambushed or sniped at, then they WP the village and its inhabitants. Nothing new. Still destroying the village to save it. And so why would the Taliban WP its own village? It wouldn’t need WP in order to do so anyway if it wanted to.

Posted by: anna missed | May 14 2009 9:48 utc | 1

gross

Posted by: annie | May 14 2009 11:29 utc | 2

b had a piece last month on the Korangal valley and the (usual) fuggup the Arrogant military made some years ago and continues to follow (SOP)

Posted by: Chuck Cliff | May 14 2009 12:49 utc | 3

seizing farmland and destroying ancient water-systems
I wonder from whom they learnt how good a COIN technique that is?

Posted by: blowback | May 14 2009 13:53 utc | 4

The Ugly American SOP is still alive. The following truths cannot be admitted:
Fact #1: United States is occupying Afghanistan to establish a puppet government.
Fact #2: Afghanis are defending the tribes and families against foreign Overlords.
Fact #3: Afghanis have a religion just as meaningful as Christianity.
Fact #4: Afghanis have culture that allows them to survive in harsh unforgiving mountains at the crossroads of the world.
Fact #5: Killing religious and political leaders and their families will not end the Resistance.
Fact #6: The US government is facing bankruptcy.
The American Administration, Military and Press are in total denial.

Posted by: VietnamVet | May 14 2009 16:17 utc | 5

Of course the supreme ironies are a) that the US is making the exact mistakes the Russians did, and b) that the ideal secular Afghan society the US says it is fighting for is pretty much identical to what the Russians wanted for the country.

Posted by: thee exile | May 14 2009 19:03 utc | 6

The public must believe that what their government is doing is rational and is not criminal. Hence the DoD denials, the blindness of politicians, the complicity of the media. War is always forced on us, never of our own choosing. Hey, we’re at war with Oceania now — ’nuff said.

Posted by: senecal | May 14 2009 21:55 utc | 7

I hope this works. Attempted link to a song explaining why we’re over there killing people.
Dick Siegel-I Gotta Cat
BTW: album is from ’94 and that’s GHWB and our 1st glorious gulf war.

Posted by: Sgt Dan | May 14 2009 23:02 utc | 8

“White phosphorus, she said, was only used for marking targets, screening troops from enemy positions, illuminating areas, destroying unoccupied bunkers and buildings and “for igniting enemy ammunition or petroleum production”.

goody goody.

Posted by: beq | May 14 2009 23:58 utc | 9

Link didn’t work for me Sgt Dan, but here’s a link (song) about the insanity of it.

Posted by: beq | May 15 2009 0:09 utc | 10

Brendan, what makes you think the Taliban is not capable of rounding up locals, into a house or houses, and then tossing in white phos grenades on them, and blaming the US for it?
I mean, BOTH sides are capable of this.
Would you NOT agree, the Taliban could HAVE done this, if not now, then, or sometime?
They take heads, to make their point. What else can they do, the US can’t do?
Gimme some equal love/hate, hoss . . . yer leaning too far one way.
Harumph.

Posted by: larue | May 15 2009 6:36 utc | 11