Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 12, 2009
Links May 12 09
  • By someone who really knows – Obama's Policies Making Situation Worse in Afghanistan and Pakistan – (HuffPo)
  • Stoking the fire – US drone attack kills at least eight in South Waziristan – (Dawn)
  • Consequences – Young Pakistan Army Officers May Be Turning to Taliban, Insiders Say – (CQ)
  • Why and why now? – U.S. Fires Afghan War Chief – (WSJ)
  • Very interesting idea – Two States Now: The Case for Unilateral U.S. Recognition of Palestine – (WPR)
  • Averny on Shimon Peres – Trivializing the Holocaust – (AntiWar)
  • Rumors – Somali pirates 'guided by UK team' – (Guardian)
  • China is still slumping … – China exports down 22.6 pct in April: state media – (AFP)
  • … and buying less treasuries – 'Horrible bond auction' lifts long-term rates – (The Australian)
  • It will be messy – GM bankruptcy likely, CEO says – (Globe&Mail)
  • Buiter on UK politics – You call it corruption, we call it family values – (Mavercon/FT)
Comments

“Sadly, U.S. forces and Islamist radicals are now approaching a state of co-dependency.”
I remember reading of an Al-Queida personality boasting that the US army follow whereever they go. Very convenient, no?

Posted by: outsider | May 12 2009 7:04 utc | 1

In terms of broad sweeping generalizations, I’d have to agree with most of Fuller’s astute observations. The fact that his opinions (and his resume) are obviously, totally ignored by the policy makers tells me that sensible geo-political, political, and cultural resolution is of no interest to those calling the shots. The U.S. political class is simply playing “fixer” brokering deals between domestic military and economic interests playing out their fantasies in a mutually reinforcing charade – that once fully digested, shits a little turd out. That the DC gophers find irresistible, if not delectable.

Posted by: anna missed | May 12 2009 8:26 utc | 2

I am not so pessimistic anna missed The Huffington Post is very much on the inside.
Anyways the US is no longer in a position to act unilaterally, but are forced to react multilaterally to preserve their (whose?) interests in a complex world.
they will not be able to talk away the economic crisis very much longer.

Posted by: outsder | May 12 2009 9:15 utc | 3

US puts October deadline on Iran talks.
Iranian missiles not an existential threat to Israel.
According to Haaretz citing al-Watan, Iran knows about US and Israeli plans to strike nuclear facilities and is deploying missiles in the Gulf.

Posted by: andrew | May 12 2009 9:40 utc | 4

Aijaz Ahmad, US policy makes things worse in Pakistan.
Pakistan war fuels international tensions.

Posted by: andrew | May 12 2009 9:43 utc | 5

According to US, Taliban used white phosphorus, at least 38 times, with weapons manifactured in GB, China, Russia and Iran. According to US sources, the use Taliban made of white phosphorus was “irresponsible”.
I haven’t got the strenght (mental nor phisical) to make a joke about that, sorry.

Posted by: andrew | May 12 2009 11:06 utc | 6

Those damn evil doers, them thar Talibanners and Al Caders have the chemical weapons!(bushspeak) We need to enhance interrorgate em pronto!
torture news roundup:al-Libi Found Dead in Libyan Prison

The Arabic media is ablaze with the news that Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi, the emir of an Afghan training camp — whose claim that Saddam Hussein had been involved in training al-Qaeda operatives in the use of chemical and biological weapons was used to justify the invasion of Iraq — has died in a Libyan jail. So far, however, the only English language report is on the Algerian website Ennahar Online, which reported that the Libyan newspaper Oea stated that al-Libi (aka Ali Abdul Hamid al-Fakheri) “was found dead of suicide in his cell,” and noted that the newspaper had reported the story “without specifying the date or method of suicide.”
It was al-Libi who was tortured by the CIA, subjected to mock burial in a box 20 inches high, in order to “confess” to a link between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda, just days after the start of the Iraq War. Al-Libi later recanted. Afterwards, he was disappeared.

Alexandre Herculano, a famous writer of the 19th century, mentioned in his “Fragment about the Inquisition”: “…The terrors inflicted on pregnant women made them abort…. Neither the beauty or decorousness of the flower of youth, nor the old age, so worthy of compassion in a woman, exempted the weaker sex from the brutal ferocity of the supposed defenders of the religion….”
“…There were days when seven or eight were submitted to torture. These scenes were reserved for the inquisitors after dinner. It was a post-prandial entertainment. Many a time during those acts, the inquisitors compared notes in the appreciation of the beauty of the human form. While the unlucky damsel twisted in the intolerable pains of torture, or fainted in the intensity of the agony, one inquisitor applauded the angelic touches of her face, another the brightness of her eyes, another, the voluptuous contours of her breast, another the shape of her hands. In this conjuncture, men of blood transformed themselves into real artists!!”

They shoulda offered him cake… or Eddie Izzard’s inquisition

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 12 2009 13:18 utc | 7

re obama’s address in cairo nyt

CAIRO — President Obama’s decision to deliver a speech here next month has given significant encouragement to a once powerful ally that has grown increasingly frustrated over its waning regional influence and its inability to explain to its citizens why it remains committed to a Middle East peace process that has failed to produce a better life for Palestinians.
After eight years in which Egypt felt unappreciated and bullied by the Bush administration, Egyptian officials were gleeful about Cairo’s selection last week for the president’s address to the Muslim world.
…..
Even before the issue of human rights is raised, though, Egyptian leaders and activists will be looking for Mr. Obama to address their first priority: the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. If Mr. Obama wants to improve United States relations with the Muslim world, that is the first step, many here said.
There was a time when progress on process was enough, they argued. Not anymore.
People here want results
, a challenge made all the more complicated for Mr. Obama by recent regional developments: the splintering of the Palestinian leadership; the empowerment of militant groups like Hezbollah and Hamas; lingering anger over Israel’s offensive in Gaza; and the aggressive foreign policy of Iran.
Still, there will be an expectation that Mr. Obama drive real changes, initially by having Israel freeze settlements, dismantle checkpoints and open the crossings to Gaza, officials here said.
“For 18 years, the peace process has gone on?” said a high-ranking Egyptian diplomat speaking anonymously under diplomatic rules. “Who in their right mind would think it can go on for another 18 years?”
Egypt sees in the peace process the key to most regional problems

fucking A

Posted by: annie | May 12 2009 14:01 utc | 8

From the 3rd link above, “Consequences – Young Pakistan Army Officers May Be Turning to Taliban, Insiders Say – (CQ),” the writer is Jeff Klein, who broke the anti-Jane Harmon stories.
This article could perhaps be part of the buildup to more military actions within Pakistan by the US: To protect our forces in Afghanistan and the Homeland from “religious extemists” getting control of Pak’s nukes.
Intriguingly and thinly sourced.

A retired Pakistani general confided a deep worry to a friend in Washington last week: that some young officers in Pakistan’s regular army have become increasingly sympathetic over the past few years to the Taliban and their brand of radical Islam.
While he had no numbers or percentages of officers sympathetic to the Taliban, the possibility of any defections raises questions about the reliability of these officers during any sort of push against the Taliban by the Pakistani army.
Concern over the reliability of Pakistan’s officer corps has heretofore focused on the ISI, or Inter-Services Intelligence service, which was wedded to CIA-backed fundamentalist Afghan rebels fighting to oust the Soviet Red Army during the 1980s. A faction of ISI officers is said to remain loyal to the fundamentalists.
The defection of regular army officers to fundamentalist rebels advancing through the Swat Valley toward Islamabad would add another wild card to various nightmare scenarios for Pakistan, a nuclear-armed nation. (My emphasis)

The column is titled “Spy Talk,” so rumors may be the usual fodder. Interesting, but how to really interpret?

Posted by: jawbone | May 12 2009 14:51 utc | 9

Andrew Sullivan of the Atlantic has recently dug up some pretty nasty dirty on General McChrystal — Obama’s new commander of his pride & joy, lovingly referred to as AfPak. Evidently General McChrystal is one helluva torturer. And strange though it may seem, he gets his kicks by freezing the living hell out of brown people…
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/05/stanley-mcchrystal-a-history-of-torture.html
Given that Bush will go down in history as one of the worst US presidents when it comes to both war and the economy, and given that he’s the most hated American president the world have ever known, you’d think that Obama would wanna do his damnedest to be the absolute antithesis of Bush. But instead, he’s doing his damnedest to be Bush-like in every way imaginable. First he surrounds himself with some of the pushiest war pushers around who love nothing more than to pump up wars with steroids. Then he puts people in charge of cleaning up our financial mess who are the every same people that got us in this mess in the first place. Now he’s got the gall to put a torture nut in charge of AfPak.
What irkes me most about all of this is that our media pundits remain silent to the fact that Obama is just as hawkish, just as pro police state, just as big of a puppet of the super-rich as Bush ever was. But none of them dare say or write a word about any of these things about Obama for fear of being blacklisted as white racists by America’s ruling elite, just as they dare not say or write a word about Israel’s apartheid against Palestinians for fear of being blacklisted as Jew-haters by the Israel-first crowd.
All I can say is that if Obama fails to live up to his promise of bringing real change to America, minus any phoniness, he’ll go down in history, along with Bush, as one of the two US presidents most responsible for turning America’s superpower status into nothing but rubble…

Posted by: Cynthia | May 12 2009 17:12 utc | 10

hear hear Cynthia
what can the outcome be? Obama is beholding to the banks just as much as w was. the same people are calling the shots now as before. the only chance we have, and it is a damn long one, is that Obama is clever enough to give these bastards enough rope to hang themselves.
he has the political savvy to do it. we just have to be lucky enough that there is a shred of decency in his body and that he wants to.
sad thing is, if he should succeed, no one will thank him and the rabid right will howl like banshees.

Posted by: dan of steele | May 12 2009 19:09 utc | 11

Apparently, for some, this qualifies as a news. Anyway, after that, how long will Zardari endure in his role? Place your bets…

Posted by: andrew | May 12 2009 21:17 utc | 12

b, and cynthia @10,
Is it true that any unsympathetic remark about Israel and its actions now can get you thrown in jail in the US?

Posted by: lambent1 | May 12 2009 22:05 utc | 13

these clowns couldn’t knock over a lemonade stand but the worthless US government kept trying till they finally convicted them of pltting to bring down the Sears tower. what a risible farce.

Posted by: ran | May 12 2009 22:22 utc | 14

lambent1, you won’t go to jail for making unkind remarks about Israel in the U.S., at least for now. You’ll be ignored or called a terror apologist or worse. But things are changing and further down the road, criminalizing speech critical of Israel seems a definite possibility. But only antisemites have anything to fear, right?

Posted by: bluegenebop | May 12 2009 22:58 utc | 15

@Cynthia: All I can say is that if Obama fails to live up to his promise of bringing real change to America, minus any phoniness, he’ll go down in history, along with Bush, as one of the two US presidents most responsible for turning America’s superpower status into nothing but rubble…
First, the US’s “superpower status” appears to be in slow but irreversible decline, regardless of who is in the White House.
Second, why is this a bad thing? Bring it on, I say. Superpower status has been good for the lifestyle of many (but not all) Americans, but the Empire has caused untold grief and immiseration in so many places around the globe. No need to list the litany of crimes here; Iraq and Afghanistan are just the latest in a long line.

Posted by: Colin | May 13 2009 6:19 utc | 16

Colin,
I really wouldn’t mind the US being a superpower, just so long as the US uses all of its power in responsible ways and for the benefit of the nation (and the world) as a whole. The US being a superpower wouldn’t be all that objectionable to me if the US could also maintain a strong social safety net for most, if not all, of its citizens and if it could carry a debt load that doesn’t eat us out of house and home, so to speak.
But since none of this is so, when the US does fall off its perch as the world’s top superpower, it isn’t likely to rest comfortably on its laurels as a developed nation whose military has been nicely stripped down to a skeleton crew and whose economy is sound enough to maintain a strong and vibrant middle class. Instead, the US is likely to face large-scale misery and hardship, existing as a third world nation whose military is so damn fat and bloated that it causes the social safety net for its citizen to collapse into ruin and whose economy is so damn skewed to the super-rich that it causes America will become a land of only haves and have-nots with little to nothing between.
Because of this, I really wish that the US had never evolved into a superpower! I really do wish that America had remained as a nation whose military was kept on a tight leash, but whose economy made the world green with envy — and green with other things, of course!

Posted by: Cynthia | May 13 2009 15:46 utc | 17

King Obama “changes his mind”, overrules lawcourts
Well, this snotty, smirking, droning, boring, dogbuying, bankbailing, torturer-defending, joke-telling, civilian-bombing, child-killing, warmongering, Gaza-ignoring, sickness-insurance-denying, “Al Qaeda”-selling, billionaire-befriending, PR-man’s wet-dream of a hope-offerer has had his hundred fucking days, and more.
This guy was basically sworn in as a war criminal.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 13 2009 19:22 utc | 18

goddamn it… that’s fucking it, I’m done posting here until typepad either fixes their shit or you change something b, this is fucking ridiculous…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 13 2009 19:24 utc | 19

U$, first totally agree on our despicable war criminal in chief.
also, couldn’t you email your posts to lizard or B and let them post for you since they don’t have your issue?

Posted by: ran | May 13 2009 19:57 utc | 20

U$ you might try dropping the link into the box under URL: and then tell people to click on your name. it will do only one link but may be a work around for you. frankly I have no problems whatsoever posting links and when something does not come up it is because i forgot to use quotes or close a tag.
clicking on my nic should take you to Politico

Posted by: dan of steele | May 13 2009 20:59 utc | 21

I didn’t want to rain on the parade of posts here at MOA when Obama was being sworn in – bit my tonque in hope and respect. And I said I was glad he won over McCain/Palin even though I didn’t vote for him or McCain – I supported R. Paul and still do. The control of the financial elite is “unbelievable” as b said in his links post today (May 13nth). I watched the youtube video of the Inspector General of Federal Reserve and didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. It is historic. This video is a must see! (The scene reminded me of the woman who was head of the SEC who was being questioned about the B. Madoff scandal not long ago. These women make good arguments for male chauvinism I guess!)
U$,
Hey, hang in there! I know others have said this before with your troubles with typepad, but your posts are always thought provoking – MOA wouldn’t be the same.
I agree typepad is less than worthless.
dan of steele,
I think the link for your name is not Politico but this no-where link: http://www.moonofalabama.org/2009/05/1
Or am I missing something here? Also, how in the world after what you have witnessed in these first 100 days makes you think Obama will succeed in anything but providing more money/power to the elite? I hope I don’t sound like Rush Limbaugh, but I don’t want him to succeed – I’ve had enough of his success already.

Posted by: Rick Happ | May 14 2009 0:04 utc | 22

yeah, Rick all the names are now linked to that same nowhere link. hopefully b can get that fixed. as for O, I am as sceptical as you but I really want to believe.
politics is a strange line of work and it is never easily apparent what is really happening.

Posted by: dan of steele | May 14 2009 6:26 utc | 23

yeah, Rick all the names are now linked to that same nowhere link.
Seems fixed to me.

Posted by: b | May 14 2009 7:22 utc | 24