Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 11, 2009
Links May 11 09
  • Where there is smoke … – US accused of using 'illegal' white phosphorus in chemical attack on Taliban that killed Afghan civilians – (Daily Mail)
  • Why then is 'the west' still there? – Petraeus: al-Qaida not operating in Afghanistan – (HuffPost)
  • Hekmatyar (again) changing sides? – Karzai in move to share power with warlord wanted by US – (London Times)
  • Lots of anonymous assertions, zero proof = war propaganda – Shaky Pakistan Is Seen as a Target of Plots by Al Qaeda – (NYT)
  • Baloch Nationalism and the geopolitics of energy resources: The changing context of separatism in Pakistan – (Strategic Studies Institute (pdf))
  • Tony Karon – Maliki always had his own script – now he’s acting it out – (The National)
  • That's not a 'promise' but a threat – Pelosi, in Surprise Visit to Baghdad, Promises 'Intense' U.S. Political Role – (WaPo)
  • Late effects of torture – Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi Has Died In A Libyan Prison – (Andy Worthington)
  • Why Israel does not want peace – Amira Hass / Israel knows that peace just doesn't pay – (Haaretz)
Comments

Gay scientists isolate “Christian gene”
A breakthrough discovery that holds great promise for families whose loved-ones suffer from this debilitating malaise. Our eternal thanks to the hard-working gay scientists who made the breakthrough.
A cure in my lifetime? /me prays

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 11 2009 8:19 utc | 1

link, typepad still sucks ass…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 11 2009 8:20 utc | 2

Via Mrzine: NAMA as a tool of de-industrialization of Africa (.pdf).

Posted by: andrew | May 11 2009 10:51 utc | 3

I’m wondering does anybody see any similarities between Gaza, Swat and now Sri Lanka….i.e. make life hell for the civilian population and turn them against the militants?

Posted by: dh | May 11 2009 16:28 utc | 5

Not a peep in democrats-dominated US and its main media about this survey that shows how Democrats are more likely to blame the Jews for the economic crisis

Posted by: Zemoralist | May 11 2009 17:26 utc | 6

@5 – .i.e. make life hell for the civilian population and turn them against the militants?
It is far from sure that the tactic works. It likely creates more militants.

Posted by: b | May 11 2009 17:46 utc | 7

I read about the accusations of white phosphorous use last night and wondered how easy it is to obtain such weapons. The US is saying that any such use was by the “Taliban,” but why and how?
I’d appreciate any info from people here who understand how such weapons are used. T/U.

Posted by: jawbone | May 11 2009 18:41 utc | 8

@jawbone – I’d appreciate any info from people here who understand how such weapons are used.
If the U.S accused the Taliban of using white phosphorous that would be a bit lunatic. I haven’t seen any report alleging that. White phosphorous burns when exposed to air. It is used in mortar grenades, artillery shots and bombs for lightening and smoke screens and to burn people on the ground.
The last use is forbidden but used most commonly.

Posted by: b | May 11 2009 19:31 utc | 9

@jawbone
Willy Pete is a petroleum product created right here in the good Ol’ USA. So like everything else, if the Taliban used it, (which is highly doubtful) then they bought it from us. We are the masters of premeditation and methodically blame the victim. When I say, methodical, I mean exactly that, it’s systemic and part of the Bush/Cheney doctrine, a protocol to accuse ‘the bad guys’ of what we do. It’s a shell game. In other words, victim blaming is holding the victims of a crime that we are selves are perpetrating. It’s a ploy that works, thanks to the whore media. so why change© it merely because we have a new liar in Chief residing in the peoples house? The only thing he’s supposed to change© is America’s image. That’s why they picked him.
Besides, we have a long history of using it, most recently in Fallujah, as well as our partner in murder, Is-ra-el in Gaza.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 11 2009 20:12 utc | 10

Putting meat on the table: industrial farm animal production in America (.pdf).

Posted by: andrew | May 11 2009 20:12 utc | 11

b, others: Here’s the article I read last night, but I’d read others earlier which indicated the US military was saying if there was WP, it had to have been used by the Taliban.

By JASON STRAZIUSO
Associated Press Writers
[This has been updated since last night and has many changes from what I remember; so I’m posting more than I usually would.]
KABUL (AP) — The U.S. accused Afghan militants Monday of using white phosphorus as a weapon in “reprehensible” attacks on U.S. forces and in civilian areas.
SNIP
The U.S. military declassified documents Monday showing at least 38 instances where militants had used white phosphorus in attacks or where weapons had been found in eastern Afghanistan, where the U.S. primarily operates. The NATO-led force supplied information on six other instances in the country.
The U.S. said militants used white phosphorus in improvised explosive attacks at least seven times since spring 2007, some in civilian areas. The documents showed 12 attacks where militants used white phosphorus in mortars or rockets, the majority of which came the last two years.
The most recent militant attack came Thursday, when a NATO outpost in Logar was hit with two rounds of indirect white phosphorus fire, the documents said. Most troops in Logar, just south of Kabul, are American.
SNIP
Col. Greg Julian, the top U.S. military spokesman in Afghanistan, said the U.S. didn’t use white phosphorus in last week’s fight in Farah province.
Farah’s governor told the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission that many of those killed in the battle had severe burns, Nadery said. The governor said that Taliban fighters may have attacked the villagers with a flammable material, though not necessarily white phosphorus, Nadery said.
The militants’ use of white phosphorus as a weapon could cause “unnecessary suffering” as defined in the laws of warfare, U.S. spokeswoman Maj. Jenny Willis said.
“This pattern of irresponsible and indiscriminate use of white phosphorus by insurgents is reprehensible and should be noted by the international human rights community,” she said. Willis said the military doesn’t necessarily know militants are using white phosphorus deliberately, but that its use is still “indiscriminate.”
[Damn! It’s not “irresponsible” or “reprehensible” when the US uses it in civilian areas?]
Militants find white phosphorus rounds in old weapons stores left over from decades of war, she said, but also get newer rounds from “neighbors,” a reference to militant networks in Pakistan.
A Taliban spokesman couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.
The U.S. allegations come after Human Rights Watch last week called on NATO to release information into a March 14 battle in Kapisa – one province northeast of Kabul, where many French troops are stationed – in which Razia was burned by white phosphorus munitions.

Posted by: jawbone | May 11 2009 23:26 utc | 12

Oops. Last paragraph of #12 is not part of article.

Posted by: jawbone | May 11 2009 23:58 utc | 13

ref. the white phosphorus issue.
The BBC news now has an article up claiming the Taliban used it (in 44 incidents !) – source appears the US military.
Me: highly sceptical.

Posted by: Philippe | May 12 2009 2:10 utc | 14

Now that my fellow countrywoman Roxana Saberi has thankfully been released I draw your attention to an article detailing the routine imprisonment, torture and murder of Bona Fide journalists by the United States of Exceptionalist Hypocrisy:

Roxana Saberi’s plight and American media propaganda

Posted by: Parviz | May 12 2009 3:43 utc | 15