Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 8, 2009
Pakistan Asserts Itself

The Pakistani government finally had enough of U.S. meddling and took a stand:

Two top US officials, presidential envoy for the region Richard Holbrooke and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen, had come to Islamabad with the idea of doing some tough talking and pressuring both the political and the military leadership to step up their efforts in the war on terror. Instead, what they got was a barrage of criticism of the American position and the allegations constantly levelled against Islamabad about either protecting some Taliban elements or not doing enough to eliminate what the United States believes are the main elements carrying out attacks on Nato forces in Afghanistan.

According to a source in the US delegation, the stance taken by the Pakistani side came as a rude shock to the Americans, who had so far been taking the civilian and military leadership for granted.

[Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood] Qureshi’s message perhaps could not have been more unequivocal; he stated that cooperation could continue only if balance and respect were restored to the relationship.

“We can only work together if we respect each other and trust each other. There is no other way and nothing else will work,” he said rather bluntly.

“We have certain expectations from the Friends of Democratic Pakistan. Most importantly, these expectations are not cents and dollars; rather it is the political support that Pakistan expects from them.”

The last sentence is a demand for support against India where Holbrooke arrived today and where he will not achieve anything.

The U.S. asked for common military operation in Pakistan's tribal areas, wanted to increase the nearly daily drone attacks and offered Pakistan a bit of money with lots of conditions attached. Meanwhile it admits that is no idea who it is fighting against in Afghanistan.

Pakistan says no to any common military operations, wants control over the drones and asks for $30 billion unconditional money over five years.

President Zardari, Chief of Staff Kiani, Prime Minister Gilani and his cabinet all agree with the new position. A bipartisan parliament committee on National Strategy also supports this:

[A] senior member of the committee, who also belongs to the PPP, said to Dawn that ‘The committee proposes substantial changes in the national strategy of combating terror which would reflect collective will of the parliament rather than continuation of a policy that was given by a military dictator under American dictates’.

That is quite a sea change in Pakistani behavior and I suspect that it has a lot to do with the general abusive U.S. behavior against Pakistan as reinforced by the arrogance of Holbrooke:

The normally urbane and mild-mannered Pakistani Foreign Minister, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, was firm and spoke in categorical terms.

Meanwhile, Richard Holbrooke chatted quietly with Admiral Mike Mullen – an act that, whatever the intention, was perceived as rude and contemptuous by those present.

The great new U.S. AfPak strategy is now in shambles and will have to be taken back to the drawing board. Pakistan will not play along and will not allow the planed widening of the Afghan war onto its grounds.If the U.S. tries to go there it will have to fight the Pakistani army.

That is good in my view. U.S. pressure on the tribal areas already brought the fight from there into Pakistan's main cities. More pressure and more fighting could easily lead to the destruction of the Pakistani state. That is not something anyone should wish for.

Comments

Dream on, b.

Posted by: slothrop | Apr 8 2009 19:04 utc | 1

what could be a more perfect replacement than a nuke holocaust of israel, done by muslims?
gee wadosy, do you have anything else to add?
b, check the first link please, isn’t opening for me.

Posted by: annie | Apr 8 2009 23:56 utc | 2

wadosy #5, you say “…although the possibility remains that some diehard zionists are realizing that the holocaust is fraying pretty bad around the edges, and what could be a more perfect replacement than a nuke holocaust of israel, done by muslims?”…
Brilliant new metaphor, but what would be the effective audience? A financially and charismatically challenged US? A possibly lukewarm set of expat zionists?
As Lizard, our fiery/limpid resident threnodist, says
…pass over angel of death no more lambs from Palestine please or else you risk proving God’s poor judgement
So – no, I don’t think your scenario is to worry about.
But cheers anyway. eh!

Posted by: lambent1 | Apr 8 2009 23:57 utc | 3

the very last thing that anti imperialists & anti fascist need are anti semites

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 9 2009 1:19 utc | 4

sloth, hmm making a point? thanks for spurring it along. you always do your part.

Posted by: annie | Apr 9 2009 1:21 utc | 5

one way to gauge how prescient b’s post are is to see how many anon posters come on the discredit the site.

Posted by: annie | Apr 9 2009 1:35 utc | 6

[Meta]
@all – I cleaned up some 15 or so nonsense comments from this thread. I am sick of repetitive comments, personal attacks and off topic stuff and will delete them.
@annie – link corrected, thanks.

Posted by: b | Apr 9 2009 6:01 utc | 7

b 8) so we can presume you’re not a buddhist. Then this news will be really dualistic!
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/business/government-approves-iran-gas-pipeline–szh
Are IrPak trading nukes for gas? OMG!!
Waiting for your cogent, piercing COIN brief …

Posted by: tante aime | Apr 9 2009 17:26 utc | 8

Dawn – Foreign policy disputes with the US intensify

Differences over India’s enhanced role in Afghanistan led to the drift in strategic relations between Pakistan and the United States that caught public eye after prickly Foreign Minister Qureshi pointed towards a trust deficit between the two allies and asked the senior partner for a fair treatment based on mutual trust and respect.
Background interviews revealed that strains in the relations were much more serious than met the eye and as the insiders put it the testing moment for the strategic cooperation has arrived and critical decisions by both the allies are due now.
‘The ties are in a very delicate stage and there are very few options left for both the allies – either to concede some ground to the other or to enter an all out confrontation,’ a diplomatic source opined adding things may worsen in days ahead because the Americans are known to be bad listeners and have an inclination for ‘bulldozing’ the matters.

Posted by: b | Apr 13 2009 11:44 utc | 9