Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 7, 2009
The New Mexican War

Mexico has quite a bit of a problem with the mafia that is serving the U.S. markets with cocaine and other drugs. Last year some 5,300 people died in Mexico due to fighting over the privilege of smuggling drugs to U.S. territory. That number sounds big but Mexico has 110 million inhabitants and 5,300 violent death are nowhere near a civil war situation.

That of course does not hinder the U.S. to press Mexico to fight a civil war that is impossible to win:

"We all have a sense of urgency about this," he said

The visit by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff underlined US alarm over the escalating violence, which experts say is fed by easy access to guns and drug profits on the US side of the border.

Mullen said the US military was ready to share tactics learned in fighting insurgent networks in Iraq and Afghanistan that he said could prove useful in Mexico's drug war.

And how successful have these tactics been?

Iraq is still fighting a civil war with itself and Afghanistan, politically under U.S. control, is now the biggest opium producer ever known. That "success" should be transferred to Mexico? What is the real intent?

The admiral said there was no discussion of deploying US troops to the border but Mexican authorities were increasingly open to bolstering military cooperation with the United States, in a break with tradition.

"What I find is the military to military relationship is the best I've ever seen it," Mullen said.

Noticed that? The 'military to military relationship'?

The two countries have traded accusations over failures in the drug war, with Mexican President Felipe Calderon taking offense at a US government report blaming corruption in his country.

Calerdon hit back in an interview with AFP this week, saying corruption in the United States was also fueling the crisis.

It is quite easy to understand what's going on here. The civilian government is rejecting U.S. demands while the military is willing to take the bribes.

"How about a coup my friend?" asked Admiral Mullen. "Sure, if you do
not mind" answered the Mexican General, who made his fortune by
providing 'operational space' for any drug smuggler who asked (and payed) or it.

A week ago Timothy Rutten remarked in the LA Times:

America's political decisions to treat drug addiction as a crime rather than a public health problem, and to legalize AK-47s but not pot, fuel an incipient civil war in Mexico.

we're kidding ourselves if we insist that this is a problem that can be wholly solved south of the border, or quarantined there if events spiral out of control.

If Americans really are concerned about the horrific toll inflicted by Mexico's narco-gangsters, we need to ask some tough questions about our own cultural and political delusions.

Tim – you would be right if the U.S. intent would really be to diminish the death toll in Mexico or drug usage in the U.S.  But that is not the case at all. The fight is about the loot and not about the casualties.

Comments

unfortunately, you will find very few people who can see that the prohibition of marijuana causes much trouble in the form of illegal trafficing, organized crime, police corruption, overcrowded prisons, and ruined lives because of a criminal record and does virtually nothing to stop the use of the plant. you will get a knowing look if you suggest that it be legalized and the person will probably think you are some kind of drug fiend to even think of such an absurdity.
this is yet another very successful opinion modification program carried out by corporate media. There was quite a stoner effort this last election with many activists trying to reverse some of the crazy laws we have in the US for possessing very small amounts of controlled drugs.
some of it is race based, such as the different sentences for rock cocaine and the longer mandatory ones for the cheaper crack cocaine. the drug enforcement program has also served to get people used to the fact of confiscation of private property and no knock searches.
of course in the case with Mexico, no one will ever address the effect agrobusiness and their Roundup-ready corn has done to mexican farmers. no there has to be some easily identifiable villain and murderous drug dealers fit the description nicely. I kinda wish the Penguin or the Joker could make a play in the US. we really need better criminals than just the poor and oppressed.

Posted by: dan of steele | Mar 7 2009 22:25 utc | 1

The war on drugs will never end. On the tube they always talk about the multi billion $ drug business. What they never mention is the multi billion $ “war on drugs” business. If anybody has seen any figures on this I would like to see a link. I believe that if you added up all the money for police, military, prisons, parole officers etc that it might be the biggest side of the business

Posted by: Sgt Dan | Mar 7 2009 22:36 utc | 2

And what about “Sir” Allen Stanford..?
Now, more than a decade later, federal sources tell the Chronicle, any alleged Stanford connection to [Mexican] drug cartels and their money could lie buried in the paperwork gathered for the Security and Exchange Commission’s civil inquiry.
Pirates of the Caribbean: Stanford, drugs and the CIA (updated)

Posted by: Tom | Mar 8 2009 0:41 utc | 3

It will end when the granddaughter of the trafficker marries the grandson of the Governor of Texas.

Posted by: …—… | Mar 8 2009 1:13 utc | 4

This military to military relationship is quite in keeping with the regulatory unification of Mexico, Canada and the USA.
No citizen has ever voted yes or no on the complete melding and merging of trade, finance, policy and regulations across the three governments, nor on the close cooperation of the military machinery of the three governments, but it is being pursued apace.

Posted by: Antifa | Mar 8 2009 1:18 utc | 5

Just came back from the grocery store. The beef was wrapped with a sticker claiming it was a product of US, Canada or Mexico.

Posted by: Browning | Mar 8 2009 2:41 utc | 6

L.A. County C.A. has approx 10 murders every weekend – that’s not weekdays, just the weekend numbers. I used ten as the lower of the numbers I found cited on the ‘net.
That’s 480 murders in just one U.S. in a year. Extrapolate that out to all the major U.S. cities and the numbers begin to seem staggering. Maybe we should worry about trying to keep americans from killing each other before we spend more time/money intervening in Mexico.
The “War on Drugs” is/was the biggest scam/social experiment to have ever taken place. I grew-up in a nice little part of California; there were more rednecks than hippies, but everyone was pretty tolerant. One day one of the county sheriffs got the idea he wanted to start flying helicopters and he found a way to get an old army helicopter donated to the department by the Feds, and I believe he was able to have the government even fund his training.
It was probably the first fall after that guy and his helicopter took to the air when dump trucks full of weed were being driven out of the foothills to be burned (well some of it was…) at the county dump. Talk about a scam, legalized thievery if you ask me. I was young at the time, and I remember the events of that fall shaking the community to the core; no-knock raids, spies, snitches. The grade school was on the main road and we’d see the trucks and the sheriff’s cars full of volunteers (to cut the plants) drive past and we children would wonder whose parents were headed to jail. It was a crazy, sad time for everyone and the weirdness led to me losing some friends and I was just a damn kid.
There are several people who blame Prop 13 for bankrupting Butte County and that it was this legislation that eventually caused the county become a center for meth. This was because the county couldn’t afford to pay sheriffs (ironically), a fact that was exploited at the time by those mad, mad meth heads (sick shit, stay away from it!).
But if you knew law enforcement officers as well as I did when I later worked at the paper, they would tell you what was obvious to most people – the flying sheriff managed to strangle the county’s largest industry. Pot made more money, by a factor of 10, than any thing else in the area and this is in a place where the legal crops are nut trees (almond and walnut,) citrus and pit fruit like apricots and peaches – all high priced cash crops in themselves, not to mention the lumber mills.
By killing the dope industry he effectively killed the county and it took several years to recover the loss of money, which moved to more remote, or relaxed places. I still remember a time shopping for school clothes before the helicopter, when rather than buy all my clothes from thrift stores (like normal) we’d did some shopping in the downtown stores. I guess I should add that my dad was the mechanic to the growers and not one himself, and we were the po’ folks on the hill, or at least some of the poorer ones. Damn, dad should have went to CalPoly SLO and studied agriculture, rather than that two-year trade school …So I remember we went into this store, Ryan’s, that I thought of as being a “fancy” place (if only I’d known about Aspen, HeeHee.) At home my mom commented to my dad that she couldn’t believe the service we’d received; salesladies fighting and hovering over us like we were oil sheiks… Only later did we realize they thought, because of how we looked, we must have pockets full of greenbacks to spend.
I’m sure I’m not the only one who notices the government spends an awful lot of money working to keep people apart rather than spending money bringing people together. Not in some economic bullshit way; but in a real sustainable, macro, long-term way.
A war on anything is a war against people and everyone will suffer. The whole mexico/canada/usa thing is a move to make fewer people richer. Soylent Green may be the answer: Eat the Rich!

Posted by: David | Mar 8 2009 3:41 utc | 7

The war on drugs is not unlike the fight against cancer. There are more people making a living of the fact that cancer exists than there are people dying from it, a whole industry would collapse if they suddenly found a cure for it. Same with drugs, legalise them and you would need only half the police force and a third of the prison capacity.

Posted by: Juan Moment | Mar 8 2009 3:51 utc | 8

Well, I just thank the gods i live out in the county, and if I want to plant some smoke there’s a little woods with a creek nearby. Good water, decent soil, and the shit grows like a weed anyway. Point of fact, though, I gave all that up about 20 years ago. In reality I wonder which direction this country is heading. I would imagine there’s a big “terra” attack coming, followed by a lockdown and general repression of any personal freedoms, at which point we’ll be one step closer to the new world order. I read where some are writing about the Amero, a new monetary unit to be used by the ‘North American Union’, and I wonder if this is all paranoid delusions. Of course, just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not really out to get you.

Posted by: Jim T. | Mar 8 2009 4:35 utc | 9

The TARP, Madoff, AIG, Stanford, Goldman, Citibank, Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Enron, the Pentagon, CDO’s, credit default swaps, Trump, Credit Suisse, UBS, Merrill Lynch, Haliburton, Blackwater, Liberty Media, Worldcom, BCCI, S&L, Riggs Bank…
The Product is You.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 8 2009 6:15 utc | 10

@David – @7 – Murders in the U.S. in 2007: 16,929
The “high” number in Mexico is thereby in line, population adjusted, with the U.S. numbers. Too high of course overall, but I find it weird that U.S. news somehow tries to make one think that these are abnormal.

Posted by: b | Mar 8 2009 6:41 utc | 11

Militarization of a crime problem …
Source: Mullen offers Mexico update to Obama

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama was briefed Saturday by Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen about the drug wars in Mexico and wanted to know how the United States can help.
“Clearly one of the things the president was interested in was the U.S military capability that may or may not apply to our cooperation with the Mexicans,” said a U.S. military official who requested anonymity because the discussions were private. “He was very interested in what kind of military capabilities may be applied.”
Mullen briefed Obama Saturday morning about discussions with Mexican military leaders about the drug wars there.
Mullen, who was in Mexico on Friday, has referred to the recent spike in violence as a crisis. Mullen has said Mexico could borrow from U.S. tactics in the fight against terrorism as it battles a crisis of drug-related violence along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Last weekend, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he also saw opportunities for the U.S. military to help with military training, resources and intelligence.

Posted by: b | Mar 8 2009 11:00 utc | 12

b@11,
I think both numbers are pretty abnormal. Civilized people don’t kill each other or at least shouldn’t. But then what do I know?
But yeah, it’s like the pot calling the kettle black… Gawd, I can’t believe how blatantly hypocritical america is. Or has it always been and I didn’t notice because Fox new, MSMBC and their ilk weren’t ignorantly shouting from the rooftops? Sigh…

Posted by: David | Mar 8 2009 12:09 utc | 13

No doubt the drug kings have their own lobby promoting the criminalization of pot etc., it keeps them enormously wealthy. Our country has been driven over a cliff by right wing Christian wing nuttery and we continue to pursue failed DEA policies that haven’t ever worked and never will, except, of course, for the drug kingpins pocketing enormous wealth that enables them to literally take over many countries whose wealth is small in comparison. When or where will the craziness end?

Posted by: knowdoubt | Mar 8 2009 13:46 utc | 14

Behind or underneath the thirst for gain there is the actual material organic Nature. Canada has water,copious amounts, the largest in the world, the West, that is the Pacific Southwest is thirsty. To tap the great lakes will be an onerous political battle, Canada is weak. Mexico is weaker, it has an enormous labor force that can be tapped cheaply, it has an equable climate, a beautiful sky, it is thirsty in the North and Center but it has abundant water in the South. The littoral is tropical, the produce first rate. What else do we want? The petroleum is said to be near exhaustion but one never knows what the oil companies know. Perhaps along those coasts there are large fields. That white USA people don’t like brown Mexicans is a given, but necessity creates wonderful adaptations and changes. We shall see.

Posted by: jlcg | Mar 8 2009 14:58 utc | 15

The right wing in America, typically ignorant about the real reason why Mexicans immigrate here, worry about illegal aliens streaming across the borders and gobbling up all our social services. California politicians have been making hay with this theme for years.
Global warming prophets also talk about Mexicans and Central Americans flooding north as those regions become desertified.
I suspect the drug issue is just a pretext for erecting a military wall around the US, and possibly a military presence in Mexico, should it ever turn seriously leftward. In other words, our next AFgahnistan.

Posted by: seneca | Mar 8 2009 14:59 utc | 16

cuidado, zapata, el gringo quiere bring la democracy a tu country!

Posted by: pancho | Mar 8 2009 15:54 utc | 17

That “success” [Iraq/Afghanistan] should be transferred to Mexico? What is the real intent?
Same as it’s been since the dawn of civilization: money and power. These grasping drones and time servers are incapable of placing the national interest before their own personal and organizational welfare. The War on Drugs, like the arms industry, is Keynesian crumbs for those too busy consuming to attend to the demands of citizenship.

Posted by: Pvt. Keepout | Mar 8 2009 17:19 utc | 18

The Mexican drug war is already spilling over into the US Southwest, armed gangs are now prowling Tucson and Phoenix, the US State Department issued a warning to students against travelling to Mexico on Spring Break.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Mar 8 2009 19:44 utc | 19

“I suspect the drug issue is just a pretext for erecting a military wall around the US, and possibly a military presence in Mexico, should it ever turn seriously leftward. In other words, our next AFgahnistan.”
I agree.
It seems the US State Departement prepares opinion for a war with Mexico.
Mexico closer than Afghanistan.

Posted by: JLS | Mar 8 2009 21:25 utc | 20