Mexico has quite a bit of a problem with the mafia that is serving the U.S. markets with cocaine and other drugs. Last year some 5,300 people died in Mexico due to fighting over the privilege of smuggling drugs to U.S. territory. That number sounds big but Mexico has 110 million inhabitants and 5,300 violent death are nowhere near a civil war situation.
That of course does not hinder the U.S. to press Mexico to fight a civil war that is impossible to win:
"We all have a sense of urgency about this," he said
…
The visit by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff underlined US alarm over the escalating violence, which experts say is fed by easy access to guns and drug profits on the US side of the border.Mullen said the US military was ready to share tactics learned in fighting insurgent networks in Iraq and Afghanistan that he said could prove useful in Mexico's drug war.
And how successful have these tactics been?
Iraq is still fighting a civil war with itself and Afghanistan, politically under U.S. control, is now the biggest opium producer ever known. That "success" should be transferred to Mexico? What is the real intent?
The admiral said there was no discussion of deploying US troops to the border but Mexican authorities were increasingly open to bolstering military cooperation with the United States, in a break with tradition.
"What I find is the military to military relationship is the best I've ever seen it," Mullen said.
Noticed that? The 'military to military relationship'?
The two countries have traded accusations over failures in the drug war, with Mexican President Felipe Calderon taking offense at a US government report blaming corruption in his country.
Calerdon hit back in an interview with AFP this week, saying corruption in the United States was also fueling the crisis.
It is quite easy to understand what's going on here. The civilian government is rejecting U.S. demands while the military is willing to take the bribes.
"How about a coup my friend?" asked Admiral Mullen. "Sure, if you do
not mind" answered the Mexican General, who made his fortune by
providing 'operational space' for any drug smuggler who asked (and payed) or it.
A week ago Timothy Rutten remarked in the LA Times:
America's political decisions to treat drug addiction as a crime rather than a public health problem, and to legalize AK-47s but not pot, fuel an incipient civil war in Mexico.
…
we're kidding ourselves if we insist that this is a problem that can be wholly solved south of the border, or quarantined there if events spiral out of control.
…
If Americans really are concerned about the horrific toll inflicted by Mexico's narco-gangsters, we need to ask some tough questions about our own cultural and political delusions.
Tim – you would be right if the U.S. intent would really be to diminish the death toll in Mexico or drug usage in the U.S. But that is not the case at all. The fight is about the loot and not about the casualties.