Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 4, 2009
The ICC’s Sudan Warrant

The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant against the Sudan's president Omar al-Beshir for alleged war-crimes in Darfur.

I have not followed the process towards, but my impression is that it was manipulated by several interested groups and nations and not driven by clean judicial reasoning.

As Sudan will reject the courts demand the issue will go to the UN security council. Several of UNNSC's members do not recognize the ICC's powers for the crimes their chief of states initiated and initiate. But they will likely have the hypocrisy to pressure Sudan and to eventually interfere with violent measures.

The conflict in Darfur is between pastoral nomads and resident farmers in an area with increasing desertification. Such conflicts are natural and very hard to solve. Usually the less strong party will have to move away.

That there are significant yet unexplored oil-fields below Darfur's desert seems to be the main reason why there is an international interest in this case at all. Similar conflicts, partly with higher casualties, in Africa and elsewhere simply get ignored.

That may well be the better alternative for all people involved.

Comments

i haven’t had time to follow it yet either, but i did catch the following on monday – no sense of how seriously it will be backed up, if the stmt is correct in the first place
Libyan official says 37 African countries to withdraw from ICC

March 2, 2009 (KHARTOUM) —African nations plan to withdraw their membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC) to protest a possible arrest warrant against Sudanese president Omer Hassan Al-Bashir, a senior Libya official today.
“Thirty-seven African nations that have ratified the Rome Statute will un-sign the treaty if it issues an arrest warrant for Sudanese president” Libya’s state minister for African affairs Abdul Salam Al-Tereyki told reporters in Khartoum today.
However the Libyan official provided no further details. Currently there are only 30 African countries that are members of the ICC.
Last month the head of the State Parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC, Liechtenstein’s Christian Wenaweser said he is not aware if any move by African countries to revoke their membership at the ICC.
African nations comprise the majority of ICC members but some of its leaders have expressed concern that the court is only prosecuting African figures.
“We think there is a problem with ICC targeting only Africans, as if Africa has been a place to experiment with their ideas” AU chairman Jean Ping said in press statements last month.
“A judge should be impartial” he said. “The law should apply to everyone and not only the weak”.
The ICC is currently handling 4 cases consisting of Uganda, Central African Republic (CAR), Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Darfur.

re the charges, alex de waal’s blog is very helpful – making sense of darfur

Posted by: b real | Mar 4 2009 15:27 utc | 1

Why no arrest warrant for cheney / bush for Illegally and War Criminally invading Iraq in order to Steal its OIL ???
WTF ?!?!?!?!

Posted by: Why Not cheney/bush ?? | Mar 4 2009 15:46 utc | 2

right, arrest warrant for Bashir but not one for Bush, Cheney, Blair, Olmert, Powell, Rice, Rumsfeld, Feith, Wolfowitz, Libby, Petrarus, Obama, etc.
the ICC has no credibility.

Posted by: ran | Mar 4 2009 17:07 utc | 3

@b real et al..
Off topic?
we recently talked of food and water, so this may interest many. There will be no arrest of Cheneyco because the epic symphony has not ended, the song remains the same, only the conductor has changed. Merely a coda. The word cauda, , simply means the “tail” that ends a musical piece following the main body. An Ouroboros.
A New Report From the Oakland Institute Issues a Challenge to Western-led Plans for a Genetically Engineered Revolution in African Agriculture
Voices From Africa
African Farmers & Environmentalists Speak Out Against a New Green Revolution in Africa

Oakland, CA: A new report from the Oakland Institute, Voices from Africa: African Farmers & Environmentalists Speak Out Against a New Green Revolution in Africa, issues a direct challenge to Western-led plans for a genetically engineered revolution in African agriculture, particularly the recent misguided philanthropic efforts of the Gates Foundation’s Alliance for a New Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), and presents African resistance and solutions rooted in first-hand knowledge of what Africans need.
The report finds a lack of accountability, transparency, and stakeholder involvement in philanthropic efforts such as AGRA. “Despite the Gates Foundation’s rhetoric of inclusion and the claim that their investment in agricultural development benefits the growing majority of the world’s poor who rely on agriculture, a leaked Gates Foundation confidential report on their Agricultural Development Strategy for 2008-2011 actually emphasizes moving people out of the agricultural sector,” said Anuradha Mittal, Executive Director of the Oakland Institute and the editor of the report. “Their intention is to reduce dependency on agriculture, but their strategy report does not specify where or how this new ‘land mobile’ population is to be reemployed,” she continued.
AGRA claims to be an “African-led Green Revolution,” and features Kofi Annan at the helm as its chairman; however, African civil society has rejected the idea that one man can speak on behalf of over 50 countries and 680 million people. It is also not apparent from the foundation’s Agricultural Development Strategy report whether–or how–the Gates Foundation consulted with African farmers before launching their multi-million dollar development strategy for the continent. Some of the foundation’s external advisors have long partnered with biotech companies: for example, Ruth Oniang’o is featured on Monsanto’s website claiming that there is an urgent need for food biotechnology in Africa, and Gates Foundation potential grantee Calestous Juma has urged the G8 to put biotechnology on the agenda for for Africa and discard the application of the precautionary principle because it interferes with the development of new technologies.
“Africa does not need dumping of food aid by rich countries that destroys local efforts to produce. Not the imposition of industrial-style agriculture based on chemicals and ‘high-yielding’ seeds, with the paradoxical outcome of greater production of a few food crops accompanied by even worse hunger and environmental degradation,” said Diamantino Nhampossa, a contributor to the report and Executive Coordinator of the União Nacional de Camponeses (National Peasants Union) in Mozambique and member of the Via Campesina’s International Coordinating Committee for the Africa Region.
The battle over genetic engineering is being fought across the world, between those who champion farmers’ rights to seeds, livelihood, and land, and those who seek to privatize these. While promotional campaigns for technological solutions to hunger regularly feature a handful of African spokespeople who drown out the genuine voices of farmers, researchers, and civil society groups, there is widespread opposition to genetic engineering and plans for a New Green Revolution for Africa. Voices From Africa is based on the essays and statements of leading African farmers, environmentalists, and civil society groups, and brings to light the real African perspectives on technological solutions to hunger and poverty on the continent–and the solutions that the people on the ground believe would bring true development.
The increase in hunger resulting from 2008’s steep increase in food prices has been used to make a case for increasing agricultural production through technical solutions such as genetically engineered crops. This “poor washing”–the spurious claim that technology will address the needs of the hungry–and “green washing”–the claim that this technology will help address the threat of climate change–conveys a false sense of need. Voices from Africa clarifies how solutions to hunger and environmental degradation require a paradigm shift that values local and traditional knowledge and biodiversity, opens policy space for developing countries to craft their own solutions, and allows for agriculture and trade policies that protect local and regional markets for small farmers, pastorlists, and fisherfolk. “The way to fight poverty in Africa is to embrace the proposal of food sovereignty that comes from the movement of peasants, indigenous peoples, migrants, women, and rural communities,” said Mr. Nhampossa. “Food sovereignty puts those who produce, distribute, and consume food at the heart of food systems and policies, rather than the demands of markets and corporations.”
Other voices featured in the report include: Mariam Mayet, African Center of Biodiversity, South Africa; Nnimo Bassey, Environmental Rights Action, Nigeria; David Fig, BioWatch, South Africa; Mukoma Wa Ngugi, BBC Focus on Africa Magazine; Makhathe Moahloli, Katleho Moho Association (KMA), Lesotho; Zachary Makanya, Participatory Ecological Land Use Management Association (PELUM), Kenya; and Gertrude Kenyangi Kabusimbi, Support for Women in Agriculture and Environment (SWAGEN), Uganda.
Voices from Africa:African Farmers & Environmentalists Speak Out Against a New Green Revolution in Africa is a publication of the Oakland Institute (www.oaklandinstitute.org), a think tank for research, analysis, and action whose mission is to increase public participation and promote fair debate on critical social, economic, and environmental issues in both national and international forums.
Download a (pdf) copy of the report here.

cont..

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 4 2009 18:29 utc | 4

Download the Introduction of the Report here.
Meet the Authors here.
Read other reports and policy briefs on the global food crisis here.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 4 2009 18:33 utc | 5

thanks for that rpt, uncle. will digest it later but i recognize a couple of the pieces already. we’ve posted similar resource materials here over the past years focusing on AGRA & opposition to it. i expect that the interventionists in obama’s admin will make this an ever more important issue.
from clinton’s senate confirmation hearing back in jan

eradicating global hunger must be embraced as both a humanitarian and national security imperative. Precipitous food price increases that occurred in 2007 and 2008 created havoc in many parts of the world, causing riots in some 19 countries and plunging an additional 75 million people into poverty and increased vulnerability to malnourishment.
Nearly 1 billion people are presently food insecure. It is predicted the world’s population will grow to such an extent that by 2050 current food production will need to double in order to meet demand. There is no reason why people should be hungry when we have the knowledge, the technology and the resources to make everyone food secure.
The United States is uniquely situated to help the world feed itself and has the opportunities to recast its image by making the eradication of hunger a centerpiece of United States foreign policy.

deja vu all over again
add’l resource – food first’s “newsletter for the african agroecological alternatives to the green revolution” – African Agroecological Alternatives-AAAGR [archive]

Posted by: b real | Mar 4 2009 18:54 utc | 6

Dear Africa,
“Eat GMO Food Or STARVE!”

Yes, their “children will sing great songs about them”,


Tell Me About the Forest, (you once called home)
Farewell now my sister
Up ahead there lies your road
And your conscience walks beside you
It’s the best friend you will ever know
And the past is now your future
It bears witness to your soul
Make sure that the love you offer up
Does not fall on barren soil.
For the wind cries of late
In the whispering grass.
Our way of life is held
In the spinning wheels of chance.
I believe in the ways of an older law
When we used to dance to a different drum
And we are changing our ways
Yes we are taking different roads
Tell me more about the forest
That you once called home.
For the wind cries of late
In the whispering leaves
And the sun will turn to waste
The heavens we build above.
Father teach your children
To treat our mother well
If we give her back her diamonds
She will offer up her pearl.
But I’m not bitter no I’m surviving
To face the world, to raise the future.
So why don’t you tell me, come on and tell me
About the world you left behind.
Come on and tell me

lyrics and music by Dead Can Dance
The Carnival Is Over for those whom see.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 4 2009 18:55 utc | 7

Harpers just put up a long post by Nick McDonell about Alex de Waal and the Darfur conflict.

Posted by: Sgt Dan | Mar 4 2009 22:14 utc | 8

Thanks Sgt Dan – interesting piece that fetches the complicate situation.

Posted by: b | Mar 5 2009 1:39 utc | 9

Predictable result: Sudan Ousts Aid Groups After Court Pursues President

Reacting swiftly to the International Criminal Court’s decision to issue an arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, the government of Sudan on Wednesday expelled at least 10 foreign aid groups that provide food, water, medical care and other assistance to more than a million displaced people in the western Darfur region, according to U.N. officials and aid workers.
The groups include Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders, CARE International and others that collectively handle 60 percent of humanitarian assistance in Darfur, where the largest relief effort in the world has reversed a dangerous rise in the level of malnutrition and disease among people stranded in refugee camps. Some groups were given 24 hours to leave; others were told that the safety of their staffs could no longer be guaranteed.

Exactly what de Waal and others have warned of. The court case will be very negative for the situation of the people it is supposed to be about.

Posted by: b | Mar 5 2009 6:03 utc | 10

As I wrote above:
they will likely have the hypocrisy to pressure Sudan and to eventually interfere with violent measures.
and today a WaPo op-ed by Obamamen: Grounding Sudan’s Killers

President Obama, Vice President Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice have all advocated a more engaged and effective policy to end the suffering in Darfur. They have also agreed that creating a no-fly zone over the region would change the dynamic on the ground.
Yet this proposal made little progress after humanitarian organizations protested.

Air power plays a central role in Bashir’s military strategy, so establishing a no-fly zone remains the most promising initiative to halt the atrocities in Darfur. During her Senate confirmation hearing, Hillary Clinton acknowledged that such a proposal was under consideration. As a practical matter, imposing control over Sudanese airspace must involve NATO and European Union allies, in particular France, which has a suitable airfield at Abeche, in eastern Chad.

By taking away the Sudanese government’s freedom to use air power to terrorize its population, the West would finally get enough leverage with Khartoum to negotiate the entry of a stronger U.N. ground force. Effective military action in the form of a no-fly zone would not preclude a political resolution, as some suggest, but in fact would make diplomacy more effective by reducing Bashir’s options.
Gen. Merrill A. “Tony” McPeak served as Air Force chief of staff from 1990 to 1994 and co-chaired Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. Kurt Bassuener is a senior associate of the Democratization Policy Council.

Liberal intervention at its worst.

Posted by: b | Mar 5 2009 6:43 utc | 11

Did’nt everyone here get the Memo??
Western White leaders and Isreal get a pass from the ICC. Only Arabs, Africans, Asians and some South American dictators are targetted

Posted by: sam | Mar 5 2009 9:45 utc | 12

de waal: Unchartered Waters


I for one cannot see a political way out of this mess. The International Crisis Group writes that ‘the NCP is likely to look for a way out of a situation, by changing its policies or leadership. To succeed, it will need to change both.’ This is groping in the dark. What is ICG actually advocating here? It seems to me that it is calling for a coup. An internal coup is possible though unlikely and not, to my mind, a solution.
As of yesterday, everything that any commentator or expert thinks he or she knew with confidence about Sudan becomes moot. Wishful thinking took the place of analysis. Nick Kristof wrote a few days ago that fears of aid agency expulsion were ‘overblown.’ He got it wrong. Many among the advocacy groups in Washington DC see this as an opportunity for leverage, a chance for peace. I fear not: the ICC is a terribly bad instrument of pressure, because (a) the pressure can never be removed and (b) pressure only works if the end point to which the pressure is applied can be accepted by the party being pressured. The ICC indictment meets neither of these criteria.

The international community is playing its second highest card by demanding an arrest warrant (the highest card would be invading the country). That card is a dud. The Sudan Government will ignore it and the leverage that the internationals possessed is shrinking fast. I suspect that we will look back on the last few years as a time when things worked as well as they ever did in contemporary Sudan–when the CPA was implemented as well as could be expected, when death rates in Darfur fell from levels of famine and war to just 150 per month, when there were numerous opportunities for international engagement in moving things forward, slowly and imperfectly, but none the less forward.
Perhaps it will revert to this after a hiatus. Perhaps, with a wave of a magic wand, all of peace, justice and democracy will be realized in an instant. Possibly, some unexpected benefit will arise. Most likely, not. Yesterday was a sad day for Sudan.

Posted by: b real | Mar 5 2009 16:13 utc | 13

The US hypocrisy on this ICC stuff is amazing.
But, Bashir played footsies w/ bin Laden. Adios.

Posted by: slothrop | Mar 5 2009 16:37 utc | 14

mahmood mamdani tries to correct the spin of national propagenda radio’s program tell me more in which the host cuts off mamdani once he starts bringing up facts – Officials Want Sudanese President In Custody

Posted by: b real | Mar 6 2009 16:54 utc | 15

Important piece in the Guardian by Julie Flint and Alex de Waal.
They had warned that the indictment of Bashir woul be bad for the people on the ground. Theyy were obviously right.
To put justice before peace spells disaster for Sudan

But it was the ICC prosecutor who set the match to the dry tinder that is Sudan. It is quite extraordinary that Luis Moreno-Ocampo and a host of diplomats and activists were capable of condemning the government for the most hideous crimes with one breath and asserting with the next that it would tamely change its spots when threatened with standing trial in The Hague.
[…]
The risks were real, and they were inflated by the way in which Moreno-Ocampo insisted on pursuing Bashir for “ongoing genocide” with, he claimed fantastically, 5,000 people dying a month.
One of our reasons for opposing an arrest warrant when the application was made last year was that the case for genocide was based on flimsy evidence and weak argument. He repeatedly said, with no evidence whatsoever, that the government was orchestrating “systematic” attacks on the camps to “eliminate African tribes” there. In an encouraging indication that the ICC judges took their job seriously, and had a better command of the facts, they rejected his three charges of genocide, finding that he had failed to demonstrate that Bashir had a case to answer there. This was a stunning rebuff to Moreno-Ocampo, who has insisted in public more than once that Bashir is guilty of genocide and must be removed from office.
Worse, the prosecutor hinted – again repeatedly – that he got his information from humanitarian agencies. The damage done by this is incalculable. Sudanese security believes international agencies have been passing information to the ICC. So far, 11 agencies have been ordered out. Their humanitarian infrastructure has been dismantled and their assets seized. The UN agencies are still there. For the moment. But the World Food Programme relies on two now absent NGOs – Care and Save the Children – to distribute 80% of its rations. Will Khartoum allow the WFP to build a new food distribution infrastructure – a task of many months? Or will it simply insist on doing the job itself? Most likely the latter. Meanwhile, in addition to epidemics and a hunger season, Darfur faces the likelihood of violence as rebels and government militias respond to the new uncertainties by tearing up the local peace agreements that have kept much of Darfur stable for three years.
Last year, according to UN figures, about 150 Darfurians died every month in violence. Fewer than half were civilians; the others were soldiers, militiamen, bandits and rebels. Things could get worse, much worse.

One very important point in there is that the judges rejected the indictment for genocide.
So according to the ICC judges the case, despite a lot of resources used by the prosecutor, had not been made that there was a genocide in Darfur!
That should take the air out of a lot of hot talk about the issue.

Posted by: b | Mar 6 2009 17:06 utc | 17

the hot air was all for a specific slice of the domestic population
july 2005: White House described Darfur as ‘genocide’ to please Christian right

The Bush administration described the Darfur atrocities as genocide in order to please the Christian right ahead of the American presidential elections, according to a senior US official.
America’s former ambassador to the United Nations, John Danforth, made the admission in an interview in which he confirmed that the Bush administration’s stance was dictated by domestic considerations.

Posted by: b real | Mar 6 2009 17:24 utc | 18

keith harmon snow: Africom’s Covert War in Sudan

It is difficult to make sense of the war in Darfur—especially when people see it as a one-sided “genocide” of Arabs against blacks that is being committed by the Bashir ‘regime’—but such is the establishment propaganda. The real story is much more expansive, more complex, and it revolves around some relatively unknown but shady characters. What follows is a short and imperfect summary of some of the deeper geopolitical realities behind the struggle for Sudan.

Following on the heals of the announcement that the ICC handed down seven war crimes charges against al-Bashir, a story broadcast over all the Western media system and into every American living room by day’s end, President al-Bashir ordered the expulsion of ten international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) operating in Darfur under the pretense of being purely ‘humanitarian’ organizations.

[insert headline – Sudan says decision to expel aid groups is irrevocable]

What has not anywhere in the English press been reported is that the United States of America has just stepped up its ongoing war for control of Sudan and her resources: petroleum, copper, gold, uranium, fertile plantation lands for sugar and gum Arabic (essential to Coke, Pepsi and Ben & Jerry’s ice cream). This war has been playing out on the ground in Darfur through so-called ‘humanitarian’ NGOs, private military companies, ‘peacekeeping’ operations and covert military operations backed by the U.S. and its closest allies.

[insert headline – Ex-Sudanese official calls for export-ban on Gum Arabic to ICC supporting countries: Esam Sideeg who was Bashir’s former economic adviser told official news agency (SUNA) that the Sudanese government should immediately order a ban on Gum Arabic exports to these countries … Sideeg also said that Sudan “must implement the US imposed sanctions” by not allowing the US to receive any Gum Arabic … The US, which buys about one-fourth of Sudan’s annual production of the commodity, has exempted it from its comprehensive economic sanctions that it imposed since 1997 for national security reasons.]

Americans need to recognize that the Administration of President Barack Obama has begun to step up war for control of Sudan in keeping with the permanent warfare agenda of both Republicans and Democrats. The current destabilization of Sudan mirrors the illegal covert guerrilla war carried out in Rwanda—also launched and supplied from Uganda—from October 1990 to July 1994. The Rwandan Defense Forces (then called the Rwandan Patriotic Army) led by Major General Paul Kagame achieved the U.S. objective of a coup d’etat in Rwanda through that campaign, and President Kagame has been a key interlocutor in the covert warfare underway in Darfur, Sudan.
During the Presidency of George W. Bush the U.S. Government was involved with the intelligence apparatus of the Government of Sudan (GoS). At the same time, other U.S. political and corporate factions were pressing for a declaration of genocide against the GoS. Now, given the shift of power and the appointment of top Clinton officials formerly involved in covert operations in Rwanda, Uganda, Congo and Sudan during the Clinton years, pressure has been applied to heighten the campaign to destabilize the GoS, portrayed as a ‘terrorist” Arab regime, but an entity operating outside the U.S.-controlled banking system. The former campaign saw overt military action with the U.S. military missile attacks against the Al-Shifa Pharmaceutical factory in Sudan (1998); this was an international war crime by the Clinton Administration and it involved officials now in power.
The complex geopolitical struggle to control Sudan manifests through the flashpoint war for Darfur and it involves such diverse factions as the Lord’s Resistance Army, backed by Khartoum, which is also connected to the wars in the Congo and northern Uganda. Chad is involved, Eritrea and Ethiopia, Germany, the Central African Republic, Libya, France, Israel, China, Taiwan, South Africa and Rwanda. There are U.S. special forces on the ground in the frontline states of Chad, Uganda, Ethiopia, Kenya, and the big questions are: [1] How many of the killings are being committed by U.S. proxy forces and blamed on al-Bashir and the GoS? And [2] who funds, arms and trains the rebel insurgents?

[cont]

Posted by: b real | Mar 8 2009 5:34 utc | 19

The non-governmental aid groups ordered out of Darfur by President al-Bashir on March 4 were Oxfam, CARE, MSF-Holland, Mercy Corps, Save the Children, the Norwegian Refugee Council, the International Rescue Committee, Action Contre la Faim, Solidarites and CHF International.
Of course, the western media is all over the expulsion of any big ‘humanitarian’ moneymaker from Darfur—the moral outrage is so thick you can almost wipe it. The NGOs and the press that peddles their images of suffering babes complain that hundreds of thousands of innocent refugees will now be subjected to massive unassisted suffering—as opposed to the assisted suffering they previously faced—but never asks with any serious and honest zeal, why and how the displaced persons and refugees came to be displaced or homeless to begin with. Neither do they ask about all the money, intelligence sharing, deal making, and collaboration with private or governmental military agencies.
Large ‘humanitarian’ NGOs (and ‘conservation’ NGOs) operate as de facto multinational corporations revolving around massive private profits and human suffering. In places like the Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda and Darfur these NGOs also provide infrastructure, logistical and intelligence collaboration that supports U.S. military and government agendas in the region. Most are aligned with big foundations, corporate sponsors and USAID—itself a close and long-time partner for interventions with AFRICOM and the Pentagon.
Refugees and displaced populations are strategic tools of statecraft and foreign policy just as ‘humanitarian’ NGOs consistently use food as a weapon and populations as human shields. The history of the U.S. covert war in South Sudan is rich with examples of the SPLA and its ‘humanitarian’ partners, especially Christian ‘charities’, committing such war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The former Clinton officials most heavily focused on the destabilization of Sudan include: Susan Rice, Madeleine Albright, Roger Winter, Prudence Bushnell, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, Anthony Lake and John Prendergast. Carr Center for Human Rights co-founder Samantha Power, now on the Obama National Security Council, has helped to whitewash clandestine U.S. involvement in Sudan.
John Prendergast has continued to peddle disinformation disguised as policy and human rights concerns through the International Crisis Group (ICG), and through its many clone organizations like ENOUGH, ONE and RAISE HOPE FOR CONGO. Prendergast has been a pivotal agent behind the hi-jacking of U.S. public concern and action through the disingenuous (and discredited) SAVE DARFUR movement.
Other notable agents of disinformation on Sudan include Alex de Waal and Smith College Professor Eric Reeves. It is through these and other conduits to the corporate U.S. media that the story of ‘genocide’ in Sudan is cast as an Africa-Arab affair devoid of western interests.
In 1992, human rights researchers Rakiya Omaar and Alex de Waal established the London-based NGO African Rights. In August 1995, African Rights published Rwanda: Death, Despair and Defiance, one of many pivotal ‘human rights’ reports that falsely represented events in Rwanda, set the stage for victor’s justice at the International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda, and began the process of dehumanizing millions of Hutu people and protecting the true terrorists: Yoweri Museveni, Paul Kagame, the Rwandan Patriotic Army, and their western backers.

de waal in the democracy now discussion linked in #16

JUAN GONZALEZ: And Alex de Waal, what about the criticism raised by some that these international tribunals seem always to target weak or marginalized governments and don’t go after, for example, the Indonesian atrocities in Timor or the American atrocities in the Iraq war and its war on terror?
ALEX DE WAAL: Well, I think this is something that the International Criminal Court needs to be very careful about, because in the initial days when it was set up, African governments, African peoples were great enthusiasts for the ICC, and more than half of the nations that became the first signatories to the Rome Statute that set up the court were from Africa. Three of the first four cases were referred by Africans.
But Africa is now beginning to have serious second thoughts about the court, and the African Union is strongly objecting to this arrest warrant. And, of course, a lot of this comes down to sheer self-interest. They don’t want the court looking too closely at what they, themselves, are doing. But part of it is a sense that the court is—has double standards and that there’s a neocolonial enterprise afoot. Personally, I don’t see much evidence for that, but the perception of it, I think, is very important. And I think that if the court is really to have credibility, and particularly in Africa, it needs to do a lot more work to work to support local national processes of justice and to be much more sensitive to the demands of Africans, that it works with them rather than being seen as some sort of alien imposition from outside.

back to khs

The pivotal intelligence asset working on the ground in Sudan to destabilize and overthrow the Government of Sudan (GoS) is Roger Winter..

Winter’s special post at the State Department was created specifically for him and his ‘work’ in Sudan. Why do Sudanese people in South Sudan call Roger Winter ‘commander’?
Roger Winter is the primary conduit for the ongoing covert destabilization of Sudan. His operations are run primarily out of Uganda, with the terrorist government of Yoweri Museveni providing support through the Uganda People’s Defense Forces (UPDF) alliance with the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA).
The SPLA is the de facto backbone of the Sudan Liberation Army, one of the main so-called ‘rebel’ factions involved in Darfur; the SPLA provides military and logistics support to Uganda from the Pentagon through unknown channels, but most likely involving the nearby Pentagon client states of Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Chad and Eritrea.

Roger Winter was one of the primary architects of the RPA guerrilla war, organized from Washington in 1989, that has led to the loss of more than ten or twelve million lives in the Great Lakes of Africa since 1990. Winter acted as a spokesman for the RPF and their allies, and he appeared as a guest on major U.S. television networks such as PBS and CNN. New Yorker writer Philip Gourevitch and Roger Winter made contacts on behalf of the RPA with American media, particularly the Washington Post, New York Times and Time magazine.
Roger Winter moved through Rwanda during the RPA invasion and worked the front lines of the covert war as a key Pentagon and U.S. State Department asset in collaboration with the Kagame RPA operation of terror. From 1990 to 1994, Winter traveled back and forth from the RPA controlled zone to Washington D.C., where he briefed and coordinated activities and support with U.S. military, intelligence and government officials.
Roger Winter is intimate with USAID, and a long-time ally of Susan Rice, former Assistant Secretary of State on African Affairs (1997-2001), Special Assistant to President Clinton (1995-1997), and National Security Council insider (1993-1997). Susan Rice is the Obama Administration’s Ambassador to the United Nations and staunch enemy of Omar al-Bashir.
Roger Winter is also a staunch supporter of U.S. Rep. Donald Payne, one of the leading U.S. Democrats who has pressing for action to “stop genocide” in Darfur, Sudan. Payne sponsored the Darfur Genocide Accountability Act and he was arrested in June 2001, along with John Eibner, director of Christian Solidarity International, for protesting against the GoS.

payne is also the chairman of the (apparently inactive) United States House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health (which held only a handful of hearings since the end of 2007, the last being may 6 2008)

Christian Solidarity International has a very subversive relationship to ‘peace’ and ‘religion’ in Sudan, and they have been one of the frontrunner organizations peddling the accusations of slavery by the al-Bashir government, in particular; a highly contested and controversial issue generally inflated and manipulated by fundamentalist Jewish and Christian NGOs and missionary organizations, like Christian Solidarity International, Samaritan’s Purse, Servant’s Heart, and Freedom Quest International, that operate in Sudan.
“Roger Winter was the chief logistic boss for [RPA] Tutsis as early as mid-1990,” says Ugandan human rights expert Remigius Kintu, “and until their victory in 1994 they were operating from 1717 Massachusetts Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. Roger Winter told a [name deleted] South Sudanese exile at the time [1994]: ‘I have now stabilized Rwanda and will turn my full attention to Sudan’. Winter subsequently closed up shop in Rwanda and based himself in Kampala working on Sudan. A few years later, Darfur exploded and with Winter’s manipulations, Rwanda was the first to send troops into that troubled area. From my sources, the Rwanda Defense Forces [working under the African Union umbrella] have killed civilians and brought in their media experts to pile the blame on Sudanese government troops.”

in one of the threads on the mv faina i had raised the question of whether roger winter could be traced to the weapons shipment destined for south sudan after reading

The appointment of the Former American Envoy for Sudan, Roger Winters, as advisor to GoSS was perhaps a clear signal of the direction SPLM was navigating its policy. As a major partner to political power, SPLM is aware that the American agenda has remained targeting Sudan. The appointment of Winters should have therefore been looked at as a step contrary to national interest which SPLM was mistakenly counted as a party to it, at least during this interim period.
Regrettably some other developments proved that SPLM is merely paying lip service to the slogans it has upheld to enlist the support of the masses in both South and Northern Sudan. Behind the scenes, it has cooked policies which were quite opposed to some of its political leaders rhetoric as evidenced by the scandal of the arms shipment.
Whatever mask SPLM puts on its face, Southern Sudanese in particular are not going to forgive it for spending money on armament while they are suffering the bites of hunger, displacement and refuge. To reap the fruits of peace these are their priorities now. But to Winters and the lobbies behind him, such priorities count little on their agenda.

plenty more to add, but too many obligations away from the computer tonite…

Posted by: b real | Mar 8 2009 6:23 utc | 20

22 minute interview w/ mamdani on wnyc on Darfur and Politics. slightly better reception than the NPR appearance, but only slightly. his new book hits the stores on tuesday. (i linked to amazon simply for the reason that it has a more verbose description of the book’s contents, provided by mamdani himself, than the publisher’s site does)

Posted by: b real | Mar 15 2009 21:55 utc | 21

Georgia Peace Corps worker killed in Africa

Kate Puzey settled into the West African nation Benin almost two years ago as a Peace Corps volunteer teaching English.
Relatives said she acclimated quickly, dining with local seamstresses and wise women, and attending a birthday party for a village child. Puzey, 24, wrote on her blog of witnessing a ritual circumcision and anticipating the start of mango season in April. So her parents, Harry and Lois Puzey of Cumming, were devastated to learn last week that someone had killed their only daughter. Her body was found Thursday outside her home in Benin.
“We’ve been told they have a major suspect but we don’t know any details,” Harry Puzey said Sunday. “We don’t think her death was political or random but an individual act by one person.”
Lois Puzey said her daughter was a staunch defender of the “underdog.”

Is the Peace Corps really all that peaceful? I found the following from the article interesting…
Kate Puzey was born in Germany where her parents were U.S. Department of Defense teachers

.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 15 2009 22:39 utc | 22

you are a sick bastard Uncle %cam. DoDDS teachers are anything but warmongers.
You need to be more careful with blockquotes and take full credit for that interesting tidbit. You have sullied the name of someone you don’t know nor know anything about simply because her parents worked for the US military.

Posted by: dan of steele | Mar 16 2009 0:45 utc | 23

I fail to see where I’ve “sullied” anyone’s name. I merely found it interesting. However, I do question if the ‘Peace Corps’ is all that peaceful or merely a softer more subtle form of imperialism, colonization, etc. Bolivia has thrown out the Peace Corps delegation at least once, too, due to concerns about spying.
Reminds me of the previously discussed Human Terrain System, but what do I know, I’m just a sick bastard. As someone from another board said, “They should be sent to Detroit and Sacramento to the burnt out neighborhoods and tent cities before we try to ‘modernize’ [the third world and…] the indigenous peoples.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 16 2009 4:42 utc | 24

maybe we’ve come to a low point in our capacity to empathize when the death of a peace corp woman who probably wasn’t a spy gets posted and interpreted by another person as sick, but DoS has a point about the blockquotes.
personally, i’m just relieved Nancy Grace has another little lost white girl to squawk about.

Posted by: Lizard | Mar 16 2009 5:20 utc | 25

@DOS, et al..
Having looked into the matter further, she seemed a compassionate, vibrant and beautiful spirit. My condolences to her friends and family and perhaps I was a bit callus in my initial post, but how long have you guys been reading me?
I would have thought by now you guys would have a sense of my character, and that it was a given, that I almost always put sentient beings above and beyond non living entities and systems.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 16 2009 5:22 utc | 26

Fuck! typepad did it again! the above should have had this in it, Xeni on the road in West Africa: Blogger and Peace Corps Volunteer Kate Puzey Murdered in Benin. It was in the preview, when I hit post, but once it posted it wasn’t. Are they trying a new censorship protocol?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 16 2009 5:26 utc | 27

Also, my #22 post, with the blockquotes had more text to it, but typepad decided to not post my comments… Fuck it, I’m off to watch movies on my eyelids, i.e. sleep.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 16 2009 5:33 utc | 28

Uncle $cam,
I broke my own rule last night by posting when I was really angry. I hesitated three times before hitting the post button and almost immediately regretted it.
what made me clench was the idea that this woman who tragically lost her life due to most likely some scum bag should somehow be put into the same category as Blackwater mercenaries with the implied inference that she deserved it.
it just seemed really out of place.
so, please accept my apology for questioning the legitimacy of your birth and the health of your body and/or mind.

Posted by: dan of steele | Mar 16 2009 17:41 utc | 29

US Gen. Gration takes over as Sudan envoy

March 19, 2009 (WASHINGTON) – President Barack Obama today appointed retired Air Force General J. Scott Gration as the US Special Envoy for Sudan, fulfilling one of the campaign promises he had made to address the situation in Darfur.
“General Gration’s personal and professional background, and his service to the country as both a military leader and a humanitarian, give him the insights and experience necessary for this assignment,” said Obama in a written statement.

The new envoy succeeds three special envoys who served under President Bush. He was raised in the Congo [while his parents served as christian missionaries during the early 1960s] and speaks fluent Swahili. He served in the US Air Force from 1974 to 2006.
Robert Wood, spokesman of the US State Department, said today “if indeed there are further deaths that take place in Darfur, there will be only one person responsible for those deaths, and that will be President Bashir.”
He said “we plan to continue to push that line because what President Bashir is doing is just creating a much, much worse situation on the ground, and he needs to be held accountable for that.”

Activists in the United States praised the choice of Gration.

Gration, a decorated [“humanitarian”], flew 274 combat missions over Iraq during the first Persian Gulf War. He held one of the highest ranking posts at the US European Command based in Stuttgart-Vaihingen, Germany.

[Omer] Ismail [,who works for the Enough Project, a US-based “liberal” think-tank and advocacy organization,] welcomed the appointment of an envoy with military standing: “We would like to have a military man who really will know what to do. Because it is not the time to negotiate with Bashir as much as tell him what we want to do. And who can do that better than a retired Air Force general? Because Bashir is a soldier, he understands that. This is a guy who can be at his eye level and basically tell him what needs to be done.”

Posted by: b real | Mar 20 2009 5:15 utc | 30

inner city press:

UNITED NATIONS, March 20, updated — In the wake of Sudan’s expulsion of 13 non-governmental organizations from Darfur, a procedural fight broken on Friday in the UN Security Council, with Sudan saying it has a right to be heard at a public briefing by top UN humanitarian John Holmes scheduled for Friday afternoon. The UN Spokesperson’s Office at 11:06 in the morning sent out an “urgent” update, while the Council met on the subject of Somalia. The update said that the “Council will hold consultations on the subject of Sudan immediate following the adjournment of the [Somalia] meeting currently in progress.”
Inner City Press immediately inquired Friday morning with a range of diplomats and learned that while a public meeting on Darfur had been proposed for Friday afternoon, when Sudan asked to participate and speak, the proposal had to be changed. The plan then switched to a public “briefing,” by John Holmes, after which no members would speak in public. To Sudan and its supporters — and it has some — this seemed like sleight of hand, a hit and run proceeding in which they would not be heard.

On Thursday the US Mission to the UN told the Press that they had pushed to get a Friday meeting on Darfur. They explained that some had initially demurred, saying it could be done next week. But with the expulsion of 13 NGOs just after the International Criminal Court indicted Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir for war crimes, and President Bashir’s more recent statements that he might expel diplomats and “security forces” from the country, the US pushed for the meeting, it said. But when a country is discussed in the Council, in a public meeting, it has some right to speak. Hence the standoff.

Update of 12:44 p.m. — on the mystery of Luis Moreno Ocampo’s strutting presence in the Security Council as members fight about the format for their Darfur meeting, Ocampo refused to answer any questions. His spokesperson, more polite, explained that Ocampo was in Washington for talks, then came to New York to speak with representatives of Uganda about the Joseph Kony / Lord’s Resistance Army case. The claim then is that his presence has nothing to do with the Sudan case — despite Ocampo standing in front of the Council chatting with representatives of Missions to the UN of the United States and other countries. As Inner City Press conversed with a UN agency spokesman and Ocampo walked by, he was asked: are you really here only on Uganda? He smirked but said nothing. The agency spokesman said, you can’t even call that a no comment…

Update of 4:09 p.m. — the outcome of the consultations was a public meeting, with “everyone” speaking, including Sudan and others. The UK Ambassador John Sawers referred to Abyei; Susan Rice intoned and inveighed against president Bashir. Russia’s Vitaly Churkin, on the other hand, called the proceedings “symptomatic,” hastily convened and politically motivated. Luis Moreno-Ocampo, long after his meeting with the Ugandan mission, is still hanging around the Security Council in the afternoon, now without the Uganda fig leaf. The Ambassador of Liechtenstein, too, is around, the head of the state parties to the ICC’s Rome Statute. One would expect Ocampo to answer some press questions while here. But so far, not.

Posted by: b real | Mar 21 2009 3:16 utc | 31

boston globe interview w/ mamdani
Politics and humanitarianism

Q. Is there a link between this book and your previous work?
A. There are several; the most obvious is an understanding of the way in which the Cold War almost seamlessly morphed into the war on terror. Another connection – with my work on the Rwanda genocide and on the effect of colonialism in Africa – is the way in which identities are imposed from above.
Q. Such as who is an Arab, a Muslim, an African?
A. Yes. Interestingly, [originally] “Africa” was a word the Romans used for their North African province. But after the trans-Atlantic slave trade, “Africa” referred to parts of the continent from which slaves were hunted and sold. In Sudan, where everybody was equally native, the British arbitrarily identified certain groups as African and others as Arab.

Q. Are you saying that humanitarianism is a form of colonialism?
A. I’m saying that historically it has been. The movement after which Save Darfur patterned itself is the antislavery movement of the 19th century. Remember that the elimination of slavery was the ostensible reason given by British officials for colonization of the African continent. The cataloging of brutalities – real ones, not exaggerated –
was essential preparation for seizing chunks of real estate, again ostensibly to protect victims. Today, the humanitarian claim uses ethics to displace politics. Conflicts are typically presented as tribal or race wars between perpetrators and victims whose roles are unchanging.
Q. Does the problem lie in who uses the humanitarian label?
A. The language of human rights was once used primarily by the victims of repression. Now it has become the language of power and of interventionists who turn victims not into agents but into proxies. It has been subverted from a language that empowers victims to a language that serves the designs of an interventionist power on an international scale.
Q. Do you worry about the reaction to this book?
A. My experience is that it is better to defend what you have said than to explain why you left half the case unsaid. I worried about the extent to which the book is readable because the middle chapters are in-depth historical exploration. I worried about losing the general reader. But faced with a human-rights constituency determined to decontextualize this issue, I felt compelled to examine Darfur in both a regional and a historical context, focusing on its complexity. This morning I received figures from UNAMID [the United Nations Mission in Darfur] in Khartoum, on civilian deaths from conflict in Darfur during 2008. The figure was 1,520, with 600 dead as a result of the conflict in the south between different Arab groups over grazing land and 920 deaths attributable, I am told, more to rebel movements than to the government-organized counterinsurgency. This is the kind of complexity that has been totally simplified.

Posted by: b real | Mar 23 2009 15:53 utc | 32

Thanks b real for the mamdani interview – so true

Posted by: b | Mar 23 2009 17:50 utc | 33

wrt #1 above
inner city press:

In a press conference last week, [Miguel d’Escoto Brockman, the President of UN General Assembly,] noted that all of the cases brought by ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo have been in Africa. Inner City Press on March 20 asked Ocampo if he intends to bring any non-Africa cases, for example in Sri Lanka where UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay has said war crimes are being committed by both the Tamil Tigers and the government. Ocampo replied that Sri Lanka is not a party to the ICC — neither is Sudan — and went on to say he is “guilty” of “caring about Africans.”
The African Union, it seems, would prefer Ocampo take his caring elsewhere. While Ocampo bragged of Bashir to the media on March 20 that “I will get him,” sources tell Inner City Press that it has been conveyed to the ICC that if an attempt is made to apprehend Bashir at this time, the African Union members which are state parties to the ICC will drop out en masse, and deal the ICC a serious if not fatal blow. If Bashir travels to an upcoming conference in Doha and no attempt at apprehension is made — Ocampo on March 20 told reporters that Bashir would be grabbed in international airspace — some will see the AU threat having effect.

Posted by: b real | Mar 24 2009 3:58 utc | 34

fake & funk: Sudan: Justice or a poisoned chalice?

After an hour-and-a-half of walking under the intense Sudanese sun, armed with crude maps printed from the internet, we paused before a field of rubble in an industrial area of North Khartoum.
Two teenagers sat on the porch in front of the still-partially standing building, conversing and watching the world go by in this gritty, dusty area of the Sudanese capital.
“Al-Shifa?”, we mustered as a question, the name of the massive pharmaceutical plant that stood on this site until just over a decade ago.
They nodded.
“Bill Clinton”, we responded, pointing to the ruins of the facility that his administration bombed in 1998. The two boys chuckled.
Just over a decade after the US bombing of al-Shifa, on March 4 of this year, a different leader — Sudanese head-of-state Omar al-Bashir — was indicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
That Bashir is a war criminal whose policies are responsible for widespread death and destruction in the Western Sudanese region of Darfur is well-documented.
Yet, after stepping over rolls of decaying labels for life-saving malaria medication at al-Shifa — and watching mounds of dark brown medicine bottles, some still full, baking in the afternoon heat — it seemed an appropriate point to pose what should be an obvious question: why is the ICC not seeking to indict Clinton as well?
Though the death toll from the bombing is unknown, Werner Daum, German ambassador to Sudan during the bombing, noted in a 2001 Harvard International Review article that “several tens of thousands seems a reasonable guess” for the number of deaths resulting from the subsequent lack of medicines in the country.
That Bashir is on the ICC docket, while Clinton and other white-skinned, Western leaders are not, has done tremendous damage to the court — and its promise to end impunity around the world for human rights violations.
Recognising the clear double standard, many across the globe, including those sympathetic to the ICC’s stated aims, have come to regard it as little more than a tool of imperialism — and one that only sees human rights abuses if they are committed by poor countries not allied to the West.
The ICC has done little to disprove this thesis. Of the four ICC investigations, all have been in Africa.
Moreover, they have all targeted either groups hostile to the West or Western allies (the Sudanese government, as well as Joseph Kony’s brutal Lord’s Resistance Army rebels, who are fighting the authoritarian, US-aligned Yoweri Museveni government of Uganda), or those whose crimes are safe to be prosecuted because they stem from conflicts that have evinced relatively little Western interest (guerrillas in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Central African Republic).
Surprising nobody, the ICC has issued no indictments for those behind the US-led invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, nor for the planners of Israel’s attacks on Lebanon or the Gaza Strip.

AP wire story dated march 27, 2009 – Dismissal of lawsuit over Sudan strikes upheld

WASHINGTON (AP) — An appeals court on Friday upheld a decision to dismiss a $50 million lawsuit against the United States over President Bill Clinton’s 1998 decision to order missile strikes in Sudan.

The U.S Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the case involves a political decision that cannot be reviewed by the judicial branch.
“President Clinton, in his capacity as commander in chief, fired missiles at a target of his choosing to pursue a military objective he had determined was in the national interest,” the appeals court decision says. “Under the Constitution, this decision is immune from judicial review.”

the remainder of the fake & funk commentary is also worth reading
also see mamdani’s march 20th commentary in the mail & guardianBeware Human Rights Fundamentalism!

The public needs to be reminded that when the justices of the ICC granted the prosecutor’s application for a warrant to arrest the president of Sudan, they were not issuing a verdict of guilty. The justices were not meant to assess the facts put before them by the prosecutor, but to ask a different question: if those facts were assumed to be true, would the president of Sudan have a case to answer? Unlike court, which took the facts for granted at the pre-trial stage, we need to ask: to what extent are these facts true? And, to the extent they are true, are they the whole truth?

Posted by: b real | Mar 30 2009 3:46 utc | 35