Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 7, 2009
Stuff I Agree With (2)

… and you might wanna read in full.

Willem Buiter: The Fed’s moral hazard maximising strategy

The reports on the evidence given by the Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Don Kohn, to the Senate Banking Committee about the Fed’s role in the government’s rescue of AIG, have left me speechless and weak with rage. AIG wrote CDS, that is, it sold credit default swaps that provided the buyer of the CDS (including some of the world’s largest banks) with insurance against default on bonds and other credit instruments they held. Of course the insurance was only as good as the creditworthiness of the party writing the CDS. When it was uncovered during the late summer of 2008, that AIG had nurtured a little rogue, unregulated investment banking unit in its bosom, and that the level of the credit risk it had insured was well beyond its means, the AIG counterparties, that is, the buyers of the CDS, were caught with their pants down.

Instead of saying, “how sad, too bad” to these counterparties, the Fed decided (in the words of the Wall Street Journal), to unwind “.. some AIG contracts that were weighing down the insurance giant by paying off the trading partners at the full value they expected to realize in the long term, even though short-term values had tumbled.”


The organised lobbying bulldozer of Wall Street sweeps the floor with the US tax payer anytime. The modalities of the bailout by the Fed of the AIG counterparties is a textbook example of the logic of collective action at work. It is scandalous: unfair, inefficient, expensive and unnecessary.

.. and criminal.

Bob O'Brian: Random Musings On The End Of The American Experiment

Basically, the gloves are off and the banking establishment – the for-profit cartel of private bankers that is the Federal Reserve – refuses the most basic explanations of where our, and the next several generations' retirements, are going.

Just won't talk. Nope. Shhhhh. It's a secret.

So AIG sells insurance for which it has no collateral, thinly disguising it as credit default swaps, to those with no financial interest in the things being insured (which is illegal if insurance), and you and I get to pay those who bought the swaps and are now collecting big on the destruction of the market and the American way of life. Not a mention of simply making swaps illegal and calling them what they are – illegal insurance, which should be null and void. Nope. Instead, we get to pay out hundreds of billions, to Goldman and the Saudis and whomever else is fortunate enough to be a counterparty – but we can't know to whom the billions are being paid. Again. That's a secret.

I was thinking about how casual the disregard for the rule of law has become on Wall Street, and how confident the money trust is in our apathy and our absence of the will or the means to interfere with their schemes. And well they should be. As nothing has, and likely nothing will.

Comments

Icepicks are cheap, clean and easy to use. They must be punished…there should be blood.

Posted by: larry | Mar 7 2009 18:35 utc | 1

Scholes Advises ‘Blow Up’ Over-the-Counter Contracts (Update2)
By Christine Harper
March 6 (Bloomberg) — Myron Scholes, the Nobel prize- winning economist who helped invent a model for pricing options, said regulators need to “blow up or burn” over-the-counter derivative trading markets to help solve the financial crisis.
The markets have stopped functioning and are failing to provide pricing signals, Scholes, 67, said today at a panel discussion at New York University’s Stern School of Business. Participants need a way to exit transactions and get a “fresh start,” he said.
The “solution is really to blow up or burn the OTC market, the CDSs and swaps and structured products, and let us start over,” he said, referring to credit-default swaps and other complex securities that are traded off exchanges. “One way to do that, through the auspices of regulators or the banking commissioners, is to try to close all contracts at mid-market prices.”
Scholes also recommended moving the trading of credit- default swaps, asset-backed securities and mortgage-backed securities to exchanges to allow for “a correct repricing” of the assets. The securities are currently traded between banks and investors, without any price disclosure on exchanges.

The estimated downside exposure for taxpayers is $531T, if no solution is found.

Donald Kohn of the Fed Governors told the Senate Finance Committee the Fed pledge of “full transparency” will “have to be modified” and the Fed now no longer has any intention of revealing the beneficiaries to full-par bailout of hedge speculators.

Posted by: Wan Kher | Mar 7 2009 19:08 utc | 2

The new feature of Manhattan streets should be bankers hanging from lampposts. A lot of them.

Posted by: CluelessJoe | Mar 7 2009 19:45 utc | 3

b –
SLAM DUNK! RIGHT TO THE CORE!
IMHO – This may be one of the most important, must-read blog posts in memorializing the history of our Great Demise. It captures in easy-to-understand terms the hard-to-understand complexities of our global financial mess – for which I for one am eternally grateful.
Excellent work here. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Darkcloud

Posted by: Darkcloud | Mar 7 2009 19:49 utc | 4

…”The estimated downside exposure for taxpayers is $531T, if no solution is found.”
Not for this taxpayer. What that says is govt may have to borrow that much for the Big Bailout. $531T equals 1.8 million dollars for each American if you keep the debt domestic. Spread the pain globally and you get 88.5 thousand dollars for each human on the planet.
So can we assume that the game is essentially over now? I mean you know, the numbers don’t work any more.

Posted by: rapt | Mar 7 2009 20:20 utc | 5

while the hyenas, jackals & wolves of capital attack the people in packs, all over the world agaian & again – the real grey wolves are not being protected & mr obama has decided to continue bush’s policy of the extermination of this magnificent beast. as in the small so in the big

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Mar 7 2009 20:41 utc | 6

Well B, we’re fucked, aren’t we.
A continuous slide of quality of life for us boomers, our childrens, and generations to come.
No pensions, no retirement savings, no IRA’s, no 401k’s, no social security.
Get old, stop work and die quickly.
Damn it sure looks different than the world I envisioned back in the late 60’s . . . . 16 in ’69.
Sigh.

Posted by: Larue | Mar 7 2009 20:56 utc | 7

b- excellent post!
All of the secrecy surrounding these bailouts reminds me of the secrecy about the identity of the firms/individuals that made blocks of trades that benefitted from the mess of 9/11.
The only folks that come to mind trying to hide their identity are thieves: and I guess that makes these bastards the industrial-grade modernized version of bank robbers.
Another item of food for thought is what are all these paper-pushers going to do for work? The po’ folks are going to be ok, as there are always laboring jobs or repairing jobs the need doing. But what good is an out-of-work investment banker? By the time everything has went to hell in a handbasket, and the city dwellers have resorted to cannibalism, the bankers won’t have much meat left on them…
Maybe the bankers will become the next hated race… kicked and spit-on where ever they show their face; forced to live in the shadows where they earn their money telling fortunes, reading palms and mixing strange potions they claim cure hemorrhoids… much like they did in their past lives.

Posted by: David | Mar 7 2009 21:04 utc | 8

I was thinking about how casual the disregard for the rule of law has become on Wall Street, and how confident the money trust is in our apathy and our absence of the will or the means to interfere with their schemes.
apathy
Well, broken down, and with word play, it is one path. Question is, will we be led down it by the New Pied Piper.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 7 2009 21:29 utc | 9

Fed Refuses to Release Bank Lending Data, Insists on Secrecy, Says it Isn’t Subject to FOIA Law

The Board of Governors contends that it’s separate from its member banks, including the Federal Reserve Bank of New York which runs the lending programs. Most documents relevant to the Bloomberg suit are at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which the Fed contends isn’t subject to FOIA law. The Board of Governors has 231 pages of documents, which it is denying access to under an exemption under trade secrets.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 7 2009 21:31 utc | 10

The panhandler’s secret

When there were old-school parking meters in New York, quarters were precious.
One day, I’m walking down the street and a guy comes up to me and says, “Do you have a dollar for four quarters?” He held out his hand with four quarters in it.
Curious, I engaged with him. I took out a dollar bill and took the four quarters.
Then he turned to me and said, “Can you spare a quarter?”
What a fascinating interaction.
First, he engaged me. A fair trade, one that perhaps even benefited me, not him.
Now, we have a relationship. Now, he knows I have a quarter (in my hand, even). So his next request is much more difficult to turn down. If he had just walked up to me and said, “can you spare a quarter,” he would have been invisible.
Too often, we close the sale before we even open it.
Interact first, sell second

.
Have you been panhandled?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Mar 7 2009 22:22 utc | 11

Good stuff, b.
The Federal Reserve Bank is a government entity.
The Federal Reserve Member Banks are private entities.
Together they comprise the Federal Reserve system.
I don’t think you will get to the bottom of this matter without considering the role of London in all of this.
First, London is the home of the CDO industry.
These securitisations were done through off balance sheet vehicles called by a variety of names (SIV, SPV, SPQE etc.).
In fact those vehicles are all charitable trusts established under the English common law. Mainly in England, but also in other common law jurisdictions like Jersey and the Caymans.
Here is a helpful webpage from Her Majesty’s Revenue and customs:
DIY securitisation
Second, London is the home of the AIG CDS operation. That is where all of this money was lost.
In fact, that is true of all the great casualties.
Lehman and Merril Lynch were both brought down by losses in their London subsidiaries.
At root you can see that this fraud is not financial in nature, it is rather an insurance fraud. In many respects it is highly reminiscent of the fraud carried out at Lloyds of London in the 1980’s and 1990’s.
This Time Magazine article is very useful.
asbestosis scam

Posted by: John C | Mar 7 2009 23:14 utc | 12

It’s nice to listen to an optimistic man.

Posted by: …—… | Mar 8 2009 3:22 utc | 13

U$@11-Sweet! Need to post that over at the WSJ-several of their readers are going to need a new trade. On second thought, screw the WSJ crowd, we don’t need any competition out on those cold streets 🙂

Posted by: David | Mar 8 2009 3:50 utc | 14

Detailed account of how the Zionist Conspiracy was funded:

Madoff and the Zionist Conspiracy

Posted by: Parviz | Mar 8 2009 13:23 utc | 15

We wasted a lot of time during the Iraq war demanding that Congress investigate this and that (like torture, illegal wiretapping, etc.)
Now we can waste some more time demanding that Congress investigate and disclose the counterparties of the AIG bailout. On the surface, this seems something easy for them to do; we the people really want them to — no political risk for them at all. On the other hand, it’s the Dem’s own President and Fed chief who are doing it now, so, well, there goes that idea!

Posted by: seneca | Mar 8 2009 15:08 utc | 16

My guess, counter-parties AIG. :
Goldman Sachs – Currently running the US, cough cough.
Deutsche Bank.
and others of the same ilk (UBS i have heard from a banker connection) -international finance overall.

Posted by: Tangerine | Mar 8 2009 23:28 utc | 17

I think this is the Corporatist Tet Offensive in the War on the Middle Class.
And we’re all just lappin’ it up.

Posted by: Justin Hale | Mar 16 2009 22:45 utc | 18