Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 2, 2009
James Baker On Solving The Crisis

When Ronald Raegan's secretary of the Treasury, attacks the Obama administration from the left, there is something out of whack. James Baker in the FT:

We should act decisively. First, we need to understand the scope of the problem. The Treasury department – working with the Federal Reserve – must swiftly analyse the solvency of big US banks. Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner’s proposed “stress tests” may work. Any analyses, however, should include worst-case scenarios. We can hope for the best but should be prepared for the worst.

Next, we should divide the banks into three groups: the healthy, the hopeless and the needy. Leave the healthy alone and quickly close the hopeless. The needy should be reorganised and recapitalised, preferably through private investment or debt-to-equity swaps but, if necessary, through public funds. It is time for triage.

To avoid bank runs and contain market disruption, the Treasury should announce its decisions at one time. Washington will also need to co-ordinate its actions with other major capitals, especially in western Europe and east Asia. At best, this will encourage other countries to take similar steps with their own banking systems. At a minimum, other governments can prepare for the financial turmoil associated with the announcement.


During the 1990s, American officials routinely urged their Japanese counterparts to kill their zombie banks before they could do more damage to Japan’s economy. Today, it would be irresponsible if we did not heed our own advice.

Baker neglects the derivative and CDS mess that needs to be eliminated. But the plan is the right one. I offered something similar back in October and wrote:

Those steps can be taken now, or in six month. Now they could help. Six month from now there will be so much damage done to the real economy, that a very deep and multi-year long recession will be needed to recover.

Unfortunately it looks like I was right on that.

Comments

To avoid bank runs and contain market disruption, the Treasury should announce its decisions at one time. Washington will also need to co-ordinate its actions with other major capitals, especially in western Europe and east Asia. At best, this will encourage other countries to take similar steps with their own banking systems. At a minimum, other governments can prepare for the financial turmoil associated with the announcement.
Can this be done in a month’s time, b, as you proposed in an earlier post?

Posted by: alabama | Mar 2 2009 17:57 utc | 1

Euros Inflations
von Raivo Pommer-raimo1@hot.ee
Die Lebensversicherung ist in Zeiten der Abgeltungsteuer eine der letzten Anlageformen, die der Fiskus privilegiert. Denn unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen muss der Anleger nur die Hälfte der Erträge beim Finanzamt deklarieren – und das auch erst am Ende der Laufzeit. Selbst wenn dann der persönliche Steuersatz von bis zu 42 Prozent gilt, ist das immer noch günstiger, als alles mit dem Abgeltungsteuersatz von 25 Prozent zu versteuern. Doch vom 1. April an verschärfen sich die Anforderungen für die Bevorzugung.
Dann darf die Lebensversicherung nicht mehr einfach nur eine Geldanlage sein, sondern muss sich wieder ihrem eigentlichen Zweck nähern: der Absicherung der Angehörigen im Todesfall. Dazu wird ein Mindest-Risikoschutz vorgeschrieben, der sich entweder an den eingezahlten Beiträgen, der garantierten Zahlung bei Fälligkeit oder dem Zeitwert orientiert

Posted by: mindest | Mar 2 2009 18:14 utc | 2

The trouble is that most banking institutions create their own bureaucracies, filled with layers of management that have a vested interest in hiding their past mistakes. Executives might acquiesce to a clear directive from regulators (after months of public comment periods and watering down), but getting a true accounting will never come.
Also, the quality of the Fed, FDIC, and state examiners has declined significantly over the years as the sharper ones have gone to better, private industry jobs. The overall number of examiners was cut drastically over the last decade as the frequency of exams was cut to ‘ease the regulatory burden.’
I also have doubts that the worse-case scenarios they will use will approach the coming reality. There will have to be many iterations of this exercise.

Posted by: biklett | Mar 2 2009 18:34 utc | 3

@alabama – yes, it can be done within a month. But I doubt it can be done with Geithner and Summers. So things will go down the hill further before Baker’s plan will happen.
@biklett – you are right, the current “worst-case” scenario the Geither Treasury want to apply is a mild case we would be lucky to hit. Worst case? 20% without job, house prices down another 50%, GDP down 10-15%.
The bureaucracies trouble can be cut away when the rules are clear – today they are not – they are fudged in mark-to-believe, ridiculous AAA ratings and incalculable derivatives. Simply start with the Helmut Schmidt: Six steps to curb speculation ruleset. Use that assumed state to evaluate the banks. A bank that under the Schmidt’s rules can not survive, will die anyway.

Posted by: b | Mar 2 2009 18:54 utc | 4

Reagan types and paleo-cons are often to the left of the Democrats, especially on foreign policy and economic issues. Only on the domestic side do the parties line up traditionally — rhetorically at least.

Posted by: seneca | Mar 2 2009 20:14 utc | 5

Baker may be to the left of the administration now, but as time goes on and damage spreads his proposal will converge with that of Mellon, the great liquidator, in full accord with old time right-wing orthodoxy. Maybe he figures we’ve already reached the point where reorganization means liquidation.

Posted by: …—… | Mar 2 2009 21:33 utc | 6

There is tendency towards calling our present troubles a ” crisis”. Actually all these problems have been present for years but early on they seemed to affect the poorer, less worthy countries. Now we are objectively within the problem and we think it is a crisis but we can very well see that it is a chronic disease. Remember the 1982 Mexican crash, the 1987 Wall Street crash, the Bush I recession, the next Mexican crash of 1994, The Long Term shenanigan of 1998, the crash of South East Asian countries, the tech bubble, then the housing bubble, then the banking bubble. The series of crashes simply manifest the nature of the system there is nothing critical about it. And probably I have forgotten many other manifestations of the disease.

Posted by: jlcg | Mar 2 2009 21:38 utc | 7

Baker is a not-to-be-trusted shill.

Posted by: waldo | Mar 2 2009 22:41 utc | 8

jlcg, I agree: it’s not a crisis because a crisis, by definition, is punctual (as to cause, time and place). I’ve been calling it a “plague”–as in the “bubonic plague” of yore, where no one really knew what was happening, where it would strike, or how long it would continue.
But the word “plague” has become somewhat abstract, because we’ve learned so much about epidemics in the last two centuries. I wish we had a better word on hand….

Posted by: alabama | Mar 3 2009 0:35 utc | 9

Banker Fecal Cranium Syndrome?

Posted by: David | Mar 3 2009 0:46 utc | 10

Let me make mention that failing to put the brakes on banking deregulations following the S&L debacle set the stage for future debacles to take place in the market. Back in the mid-80s, the Keating Five pioneered this push for further regulatory cuts in our banking system. They did this so that Keating and other like banksters in cahoots with the Michael Milkens of the World could be free to milk the S&Ls dry for themselves at the expense of many American retirees. So those who were at or near retirement bore most of the brunt from this debacle, leaving the rest of us relatively unscathed.
Then in the mid-90s to early 00s, further deregulations were enacted, unleashing derivatives into the marketplace. Enron was one of the first to make money hand over fist, not by producing more and better energy products and services, but by betting the farm on derivatives. At first, gambling on energy derivatives did pay off for Enron investors, enabling them to make a killing in the energy futures market. Then all of a sudden, they lost big time because the master minds behind Enron could no longer hide the fact that their company was awash in debt, sending this once high-flier on Wall Street swirling down the drain. Enron was a leading player in first inflating the dot.com bubble and then deflating it. This caused a load of nest eggs and college funds to crash and burn without causing much damage to well-diversified portfolios.
Fast forward to the present, what crooks are now doing in the credit market is what the crooks did to the S&Ls and Enron all rolled up into one. They manufactured a lot of Milken-like junk bonds and bet the farm on a whole slew of derivatives. But this time around, they are not just causing huge losses to those at or near retirement and college age, they are causing huge losses to people of all ages and from all walks of life.
Cynthia | 03.02.09 – 5:54 pm | #

Posted by: Cynthia | Mar 3 2009 1:05 utc | 11

by a strange coincidence, alabama i have been rereading camus including ‘la peste’ & the plague seems an appropriate term of reference & within the work there are even crueler resonance,’le mythe de sisyphe’ – with the ffunding of the reconstruction of gaza to be demolished in the near future by israel then we’ll look for funding again until it becomes another settlement of greater israel

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Mar 3 2009 1:21 utc | 12

tunnel dumb number junkies

Posted by: Lizard | Mar 3 2009 1:52 utc | 13

By an even stranger coincidence this running dog just tonight read a letter that Camus wrote Roland Barthes about The Plague. Describes it as a transparent allegory of resistance to Nazi tyranny and says he never made it explicit because terror has several faces. But his neat trick of de-anthropomorphizing the terror makes it all the better for an emergent, impersonal, uncontrollable thing like effondrement. Because, honestly, you can’t put a face on what’s happening. It isn’t human.

Posted by: …—… | Mar 3 2009 2:11 utc | 14

For once, I agree with Waldo.

Posted by: Obamageddon | Mar 3 2009 2:38 utc | 15

Simultaneously on- and off-topic, some humanity amid the gloom:

Banker Gives $60 Million Profits to Employees

Posted by: Parviz | Mar 3 2009 6:01 utc | 16

Obamanomics to finally finish what Reganomics started, ie the ultimate slaying of the Beast. 🙂

Posted by: a | Mar 3 2009 6:16 utc | 17

Very incisive commentary by Michel Chossudovsky who argues that the “2nd New Deal” is nothing more than a Pentagon/Wall Street/Big Oil subsidy in disguise:

America’s Fiscal Collapse

Posted by: Parviz | Mar 3 2009 6:29 utc | 18

Lizard@#13 tunnel dumb number junkies ~ heh
Parviz@18 Mr. Chossudovsky is impressive in the extreme but my faith in president Obama is firm. Globalisation has been occurring for twenty years. The criminal class perpetrating it have been around forever. There is plenty of logic in being worried; we are, after all, merely a virus on a speck of dust suspended in a limitless void. But I was far more concerned of mankind’s future under the reign of the chimp, and his parting financial curse, though debilitating, is not fatal. Life is a miracle, humankind amazing and the positive possibilities endless. Ergo, Obama can succeed in restoring a degree of honour and honesty to the world’s political and financial landscape, the greatest technical revolution in the history of mankind will proceed and man’s spirituality will continue to evolve.

Posted by: waldo | Mar 3 2009 8:14 utc | 19

waldo, I regret to have to agree with what you say yet again. This is getting boring 😉
It’s a bit like watching tsunamis, some larger, some smaller, but the ocean and the sea shores don’t disappear — though the Maldives might :-((
We’ll just have to waity and hope. There’s nothing left to do, and certainly the Communists on this Blog won’t be able to alter the human psyche substantially enough to rid it of plain ol’ greed and bring peace and equality to the world.

Posted by: Parviz | Mar 3 2009 13:25 utc | 20

Globalisation has been occurring for twenty years
to paraphrase b, read up a bit on history
the Communists on this Blog
red baiting?

Posted by: b real | Mar 3 2009 14:36 utc | 21

Ergo, Obama can succeed in restoring a degree of honour and honesty to the world’s political and financial landscape, the greatest technical revolution in the history of mankind will proceed and man’s spirituality will continue to evolve.
Wow, that agreement was short-lived. We’re back to disagreement again.

Posted by: Obamageddon | Mar 3 2009 16:15 utc | 22

I have this weird feeling–not based on anything much–that Baker may be running interference for Volcker. If so, then Summers and Geithner may eventually be moved aside, once they’ve done enough damage to make this politically feasible….

Posted by: alabama | Mar 3 2009 16:23 utc | 23

Parviz,
Thanks for sharing that story about a Miami banker named Leonard Abess who looks out for the interest of his customers, his investors and even his employees. He’s a rare breed indeed!
It gives me a good feeling to know that there’s at least one banker out there who’s not a crook. Obama may have been smart enough to invite Abess over for dinner, but he wasn’t smart enough to make him one of economic advisers. But Obama still has time to show us that he’s not short on smarts by throwing out Geithner and his band of neolib thieves and replace them with Abess and other progressive types such as Dean Baker, Paul Krugman and Jamie Galbraith, just to name a few. It’s glaringly obvious that Geithner and his ilk are putting the interest of brain-dead banks over the interest of the rest of the economy that can still function without federal life support.

Posted by: Cynthia | Mar 3 2009 18:14 utc | 24

Obamageddon@22 ~ So, mate, what will happen?

Posted by: waldo | Mar 4 2009 3:36 utc | 25