Some 14 hours ago I commented on today's attacks in Afghanistan:
Mumbai tactics in Kabul
Now Reuters agrees:
The militants' aim appeared to be to shoot dead as many people as possible before blowing themselves up, a style of attack with similarities to that seen in the Indian city of Mumbai in November.
…
"In total, 20 people have been killed, 57 have been wounded," Atmar said.Taliban spokesmen swiftly claimed the attack, saying it was in revenge for the treatment of jailed insurgents.
Now – which Taliban claimed responsibility?
The 'west' makes the mistake to attach the Taliban label to anything that shoots at its soldiers in Afghanistan. But there are many resistance groups under different commands and with different interests in Afghanistan. The regular Afghan Pashtun Taliban hardly ever use bombs with an attached human guidance system.
This was something different. The style points to the Pakistani Lashkar-e-Taiba who the Indians say was responsible for the Mumbai attacks. But that group is mostly concerned with Kashmir and has not be known for action in Afghanistan.
Did they rent out their capabilities to someone else? If so who paid them? Who has an interest in making the Karzai government look incapable of providing security even at its center?