|
OT 09-02
News & views … open thread …
Malooga and U$, excellent links, thank you.
From $cam’s linked 6-part Dissident Voice Series, a highly-detailed takedown of the current disaster capital situation written between September 2008 and today … a good description of why our current system needs an ever-growing creation of capital.
Followed by Malooga’s equally pertinent The Right To The City link which describes what happens when that excess capital needs a place to be spent, in this example on luxury or industrial urbanization in place of people’s homes … people who are surplus labor. Robert Moses who “took a meat axe to The Bronx.”
This analysis is beginning to make sense.
Dissident Voice
What nearly everyone fails to understand — or in some cases understand sufficiently well — is that the real root of the problem lies with our money creation system. Presently we have bank credit serving as money. It is a money of accounts, rather than a money of exchange. Put another way and as former Senator Robert Owen, original co-sponsor of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act, later complained, some last minute back-door tweaking of the Fed Act gave us a currency with debt-creating power instead of a currency with debt-paying power.
As a result our money is essentially being created by the Federal Reserve and other banks through the making of loans or providing of credit. Up until now, this has been done primarily through the fractional reserve system, which allows the banking system, as a whole, to create many times more “money” as loans than what the initial reserves amount to. In point of fact the initial reserves are not themselves “money” but actually loans — or perhaps more accurately, credit — provided by the privately-owned Federal Reserve to our government.
Thus, it is the privately-owned banking system that controls our money supply because it is through this system that our money gets created. Today, a shadow banking system is also creating our money through the highly leveraged “off balance sheet” activities of the derivatives market.
Some refer to this type of money as false money or substitute money because money is in effect created when banks make loans to a borrower. These loans always have interest attached and yet no money is created to pay the interest charges due on this debt. The only way to pay these interest charges is by creating more debt as “money” — and this then serves to increase the “money” supply.
The Right To The City
Capitalists have to produce a surplus product in order to produce surplus value; this in turn must be reinvested in order to generate more surplus value. The result of continued reinvestment is the expansion of surplus production at a compound rate—hence the logistic curves (money, output and population) attached to the history of capital accumulation, paralleled by the growth path of urbanization under capitalism.
The perpetual need to find profitable terrains for capital-surplus production and absorption shapes the politics of capitalism. … If labour is scarce and wages are high, either existing labour has to be disciplined—technologically induced unemployment or an assault on organized working-class power are two prime methods—or fresh labour forces must be found by immigration, export of capital or proletarianization of hitherto independent elements of the population.
…
Consider, first, the case of Second Empire Paris. The year 1848 brought one of the first clear, and European-wide, crises of both unemployed surplus capital and surplus labour. … Bonaparte, who engineered a coup in 1851 dealt with [the crisis] by means of a vast programme of infrastructural investment both at home and abroad. In the latter case, this meant the construction of railroads throughout Europe and into the Orient, as well as support for grand works such as the Suez Canal. At home, it meant consolidating the railway network, building ports and harbours, and draining marshes. Above all, it entailed the reconfiguration of the urban infrastructure of Paris.
…
cafés, department stores, fashion industry and grand expositions all changed urban living so that it could absorb vast surpluses through consumerism. But then the overextended and speculative financial system and credit structures crashed in 1868. Haussmann was dismissed …
…
Fast forward now to the 1940s in the United States. The huge mobilization for the war effort temporarily resolved the capital-surplus disposal problem that had seemed so intractable in the 1930s, and the unemployment that went with it.
…
As in Louis Bonaparte’s era, a hefty dose of political repression was evidently called for by the ruling classes of the time; the subsequent history of McCarthyism and Cold War politics, of which there were already abundant signs in the early 40s, is all too familiar. On the economic front, there remained the question of how surplus capital could be absorbed.
In 1942, a lengthy evaluation of Haussmann’s efforts appeared in Architectural Forum. It documented in detail what he had done, attempted an analysis of his mistakes but sought to recuperate his reputation as one of the greatest urbanists of all time. The article was by none other than Robert Moses, who after the Second World War did to New York what Haussmann had done to Paris.
Very interesting, as Moses went out of favor after decades that transformed the US from urban and rural to basically a soulless suburbia, a main point of the later part of the article.
What follows from this is the idea that there are tremendous amounts of surplus capital (money) in the world right now, and a surplus of labor once again. What will happen? The money will buy up homes and resources, but what if any infrastructure creation will occur, and how will that change the way we live?
Thanks for a great afternoon’s reading, keep up the good work.
Final paragraph from The Right To The City
One step towards unifying these struggles is to adopt the right to the city as both working slogan and political ideal, precisely because it focuses on the question of who commands the necessary connection between urbanization and surplus production and use. The democratization of that right, and the construction of a broad social movement to enforce its will is imperative if the dispossessed are to take back the control which they have for so long been denied, and if they are to institute new modes of urbanization. Lefebvre was right to insist that the revolution has to be urban, in the broadest sense of that term, or nothing at all.
Posted by: jonku | Jan 14 2009 1:06 utc | 23
This is a mean rant. Not much new in it, probably not even any truth, just my crazy views on life at the moment. I had to spew this somewhere–try not to get any on you and remember to flush when finished.
The news has me in a funk.
Listening to Democracy Now! Driving home from a buddy’s house and hearing pro-israel supporters at a rally talking about killing Palestinians and sounding exactly like rednecks, but with funny, whiny accents. They were vomiting hate and shitting-out horror fantasies of what needed to be done to Gaza. After about three minutes of their racist anger, the program switched to a group of jewish folks condeming israel’s actions, and voicing their support for the Gazaans.
This group, by design or luck sounded like scholars compared to the hate mongers, when discussing the plight of Gaza and the horrors caused by the IDF. The contrast between how both groups sounded when talking got me thinking, and then I started to feel even worse as I realized I was hearing the voice of typical political thuggery from one group and the voice of the soon-to-be disappeared intellectuals out of the other.
I felt a darker sadness wash over me as I thought about what is about to happen in the world… And I’d suggest you find extra copies of the books you care about, and hide them someplace very, very safe.
History is the same tired, three-act play preformed over and over. The script doesn’t change; the leading actors spend most of their time lying and seeing who can bugger the most extras before the curtains close. Think Caligula, the movie, and the moment his lard-covered fist…Which shows how things have gotten worse, as they don’t even bother with the lard these days.
I’ve read too many books, too much about history to see any quiet future left for me. Instead I see but a bunch of those “interesting times” the Chinese like to curse others to enjoy.
I think reading Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 and Fitzgerald’s, A Diamond as Big as the Ritz would show you some of the possible futures we might experience. But there is also part of me that could be convinced of a future earth as seen though the eyes of Douglas Adams
I feel like I’m viewing the past through a stained-glass window; the exact same scene, but a different color and shade, depending upon which pane you choose to look through. Looking out my magical multicolored window at the Obama moment and I can see many different possibilities through the slices of tinted glass.
I have the most unpleasant feeling come over me while thinking about what the next months of Obama’s administration are likely to bring. The sensation is similar to food poisoning in that I don’t know if I want to puke, shit or both.
It isn’t that Obama himself makes me sick. He is just another in a long list of actors who play their part with enthusiasm and gusto on the public stage. He’s done a damn fine job of saying his lines and making his audience believe he is the second coming of both dead Kennedys, and the Black Jesus, all rolled-up into one.
America’s Summer-of-Love-Woodstock-hippies let Nixon walk and ended up voting Reagan into office after tiring of the touchy-feely former nuclear submarine commander called Carter.
They did this while snorting coke in urban hot tubs and proclaiming that, “Greed was good!” which they have continued to shout loudly for 29 years, despite all the evidence to the contrary.
The Baby Boomers, which are a mighty generation of massive, mindless, television worshiping degenerates who have, though laziness and ignorance, squandered the country their parents and grandparents saved pennies to buy–while fighting two terrible world wars to protect (well, at least this is what they thought they were fighting for.)
Voting Obama into office is a wishful, wistful way the spoiled generation of Boomers is hoping to prove they didn’t really sell-out and the “justice” they fought for was finally realized. This, they think, will be their legacy when like Bush’s, it’s just more of the same old crap, repackaged all nice and touchy-feely.
“Oooh, we’s finally gots us one of them colored fellows elected president, damn ain’t we progressive?”
Obama will do to and for the average black dude, what the typical white politician does, and that’s screw him. Just like what happens to the average white dude and average Hispanic dude, ect. I just wonder how hard a screwing the middle class will take before they wake-up and realize their poopers hurt even worse than before.
The reason for their rectal pain is easy to understand, what will happen because of it is another thing.
I’d venture to guess the voting-block that brought Obama to the white house will refuse to see the obvious, like the emperor who’d heavily invested in a new set of clothes. This combined with their increased chance of age-related dementia, prescription drug use and general grumpiness will give the State an endless army of rats, informers and willing prison guards who all vote Democrat, so they can’t be evil? Can they?
I don’t want to believe that a society that can give us Dunkin’ Donuts, the Internet and Madonna is but inches away from stepping right back into some backwoods bullshit past. But from where I sit it looks like it wouldn’t take a very big, or very slippery, banana peel to cause us to slip right back into some feudal freak show with thumb screws and hot irons.
Them good old Inquisition dayz are here again, Dawg.
Posted by: David | Jan 14 2009 5:07 utc | 28
Surgar Weekly English Edition
Gul Agha Sherzai: No more bloodshed
By Qadir Afghan, reporting for Surgar, Kabul
English Editors Rahimullah Akrami and Peter Torbay
Surgar obtains an exclusive interview by reporter Qadir Afghan with the Presidents’
consulting minister and Nangarhar province governor, His Most Honorable Gul Agha Sherzai)
Surgar:
A while ago, in the Karzai-ruled government, the reclusive Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar was invited to peace talks by the Afghan president Hamid Karzai. Some believe peace talks with the biggest opposition group of the Afghan government, the Taliban, is a possibility, while others insisted it’s not going to happen. Thus, Surgar has approached the president’s consulting minister and Nangarhar’s governor Gul Agha Sherzai, to ask his insight on the issue.
Let’s initiate this interview with perhaps the most frequently asked question about the popular face in Afghan politics: What’s your secret of being tremendously beloved by the Afghan people?
Sherzai:
First of all, I am blessed that I am a Muslim and an Afghan. Including my father, many of my relatives have sacrificed their precious lives in order to fight against the foreign rule and save the country. With God’s grace, I have also carried out the loyal duty. Starting from the colonizing Communists, Al Qaeda and any foreign groups who have attempted to rule our country, we will fight and oust them out of the country. This is our country. We hold the rights to be served. So to have served the country, we would spill blood, if we need to, we will sweat, if we have to, and we will fight the holy war, when we need to.
Although I shouldn’t talk about my accomplishments, to be more specific in regards of your question, I should say I work for the people, and when they like my work I feel joy. So They are the ones who have the rights to judge me in that area, not me.
But meanwhile, I would like to say that I have worked night and day to my best in order to serve my people. If Allah will invest more power in me, I will continue the humble service. However, I thank the people for having love for me and who appreciate my work.
Surgar:
As an active politician in the country for the past three decades, you might have noticed that Afghanistan has not only suffered in the reconstruction areas, but it struggles in several other areas as well, such as loose security, and failing to maintain freedom. So, why has your efforts only been in the reconstruction area?
Sherzai:
I feel assured that every Afghan is aware that I was the first one who suggested to organize a joint peace council (Jirga) under the leadership of tribal leaders among Afghanistan and the neighboring country Pakistan in order to restore peace in the restive areas on both the Afghan side of the border and the Pakistan side of the border. We approached the president Hamid Karzai and asked him to organize the Jirga amid the two countries, which was called Peace Caravan, in order to wipe out the growing violence in the restive borders of the two countries and unit the people of that area.
After the president approval, we held the peace Jirga and the representatives from both countries participated. So, I can tell you that I have not only paid attention to the reconstruction of the country, but I have also made efforts to maintain security and providing a secure environment for my people. As the governor of Nangarhar, I have taken vital steps in order to create a peaceful environment and maintain security there. Eradicating poppy growth to an zero, providing educational opportunities to the youth of not only Nangarhar, but every young man in the country, including the Kandaharis, are other examples of my work as the governor.
I don’t want to brag about my works or accomplishments, but since you have asked, I told you some as examples. What I want the most, and what matters to me the most, is peace. Peace is Allah’s word and all the good deeds are mixed within the peace. Our prophet Mohammad, Peace be upon Him, has also said that the act of forgiving gives more joy than taking one’s revenge.
Taking this opportunity, I would like to ask those Afghans in opposition to the government to put an end to the long war and join the hands of peace with their brothers. As a peace-sider, I don’t want any more bloodshed to flow in Afghanistan. If we notice, both sides at war and killing each other are Afghans.
Therefore, I urge the opposition Taliban to agree to peace talks. We Afghans should join hands together, and stand under one flag: the flag of peace.
Surgar:
Mr. Sherzai, if one notices, taking a look back at the seven years of Karzai government, you have had many accomplishments in the reconstruction programs for a number of areas of the country. What’s the reason of your success in this area?
Sherzai:
I love to reconstruct my country. In whichever provinces like Kandahar, Nangarhar and including the capital Kabul of the county, I have carried out rehabilitation works. It was all for the good of the country.
But to really help the country, I couldn’t carry out all this reconstruction activity on my own. I was assisted by many other Afghans, especially the people of Nangarhar. I should not forget about the assistance I have received from the people and the government of America, the United Kingdom, Japan, European United Nations, and many other countries world wide which have supported me in rebuilding my country.
As you all know, every work needs a plan and a strategy, whether a rehabilitation project, eradicating poppy or maintaining security. So whenever I do service for my country, I move on with a plan, a plan I have focused on well. So my success lies within a well organized and effective plan for carrying out everything.
Surgar:
Mr. Sherzai, in order to find out people’s opinion about who they will vote in the upcoming presidential elections, Surgar has taken a survey putting some well know political faces including your name into the voting circle. After the completion of our survey, we found that you had the most votes. So, we may have answered the popular question today, who will Afghans vote for?
Would you tell us if you have any plans of announcing yourself as one of the candidates for the upcoming presidential elections?
Sherzai:
It’s people’s love and kindness to support me. I have been informed of other top positions, in several surveys taken by both the domestic and the international media, including a special survey taken by the United Nations for the elections. However, it’s early to say whether or not I want to announce myself as an official candidate. I believe it all depends on both the peoples’ and the nation’s good will.
So I am not able to tell you anything about the issue just yet.
Surgar:
A number of political experts believe that you are the most important member of the U.S. president-elect Barack Obama’s team in Afghanistan. They claim the best reason is the first hand visit of the new president with you. What is your point of view on the issue and where do you see these rumors going? Is there any truth there?
Sherzai:
I can’t say much. But to address your question, Obama’s first visit with me was in appreciation of my accomplishments in the country. Second, at that time, he was a candidate for the U.S. presidential elections and asked my opinion in maintaining stability and putting an end to the ongoing violence in Afghanistan. As a champion in the reconstruction of the country, becoming the Personality of the Year in 2006, and receiving people’s support were all the reasons Obama chose to visit me on his first trip to our country.
He asked many questions about the country’s current security, rehabilitation and the restive border areas of the country in order to find a solution. As the president-elect was informed that I carry out my works in accordance with detailed plans, therefore, he chose to visit me first and asked my opinions. I shared all I had in mind. Then, he requested that I give him some written ideas, and I fulfilled this request as well.
However I should say that after asking some of our top experts, scholars, politicians, I called for a meeting in order to discuss ways of bring security and restoring peace in the country. Then we arranged a written plan addressing the problems and sent it to president-elect Obama as our consensus position paper.
We pray to Allah that they put the plan into practical work, so our country can develop and stand in the list of the developed countries.
Surgar:
Would you share some of the most important points of your consensus plan that you sent to the U.S. president-elect?
Sherzai:
We urged long-lasting projects in the war-troubled countryside, which will help lower the high unemployment rates, help maintain security and result in the gradual cessation of hostilities, by bringing an end to this long war in the country. We also insisted on a local jobs creation provision in our proposal, because most of our population is illiterate. Many Afghans either work for very low pay, or do not have a job at all. We are starting all over again.
Therefore, we thought that in a society with so much illiteracy after thirty years of war, we should focus on creating jobs and employment, gradually raising economic standards, providing skills training and the organization and management to support such a large redevelopment program.
Second, we insisted on calling on our Afghan brothers in opposition to the government, to accept peace and put an end to the bloodshed in our country, an end to Afghan youth killing Afghan youth. Another part of our plan recommended that those occupation forces practicing capture or execution of Muslim scholars and Taliban fighters should cease and desist, then the National government should negotiate peace with the opposition groups, so reconstruction can begin.
Foreign forces should carry out their joint military and reconstruction support operations along with the Afghan forces. Civilians’ house searches must stop, but if the situation requires a house search, then Afghan forces should do the search, not the international forces, in order to avoid any cultural affronts and unforgiveable insults to civilians by foreigners.
At last, I recommended the political divide between the neighboring countries of Pakistan and Afghanistan should be removed.
Surgar:
Mr. Sherzai, when President-elect Obama asks your opinion, naturally he should have his own opinion and strategy as well on the country. If he spoke of one, what were the important points? Was it similar to that of George W. Bush’s or different?
Sherzai:
Obama has not yet publicly announced his policy about Afghanistan. After taking my opinions, he took President Hamid Karzai’s insight and he might have taken other politicians ideas too. Bush’s presidency is history now, and Obama is ready to govern, so we will see what policy he has in mind. Only time will tell us if Obama goes on the Bush path, or creates his own vision.
Surgar:
Being the key member of the Karzai administration, or, and if it’s said in another way, as one of the establishers of his government, and looking back to the past seven years of the current government, how do you analyze it. Good, or the opposite?
Sherzai:
It’s generally understood that every long-lasting government has its own revolutionary people within every region. President Karzai took over the country while it existed in violent turmoil. Foreigners have intervened in the country for twenty years. Treachery was paid for by foreign countries, including neighboring countries, to harm our democracy and destroy Afghanistan. Opposite political parties leaders were active. So, by looking at all this crisis, Karzai’s government is faced with many
difficult struggles.
The language difference in the country was yet another challenge in Karzai’s administration. The president always tried to keep the balance and make up a team of his own choice, giving every tribe a chance to govern in his administration. By not being able to fully do so, his current administration is crippled. Some ministers serves the country, others did not. Some governors work for the country, others do not, and the same way goes for police commanders and others in power.
There are even some in his administration who worked directly against the president to cause failure in his policies.
Keeping all these points in mind, many people complain about the Karzai government, some of which are true, some are not. We can say that president Karzai didn’t come from a specific political party. If someone becomes the president after him, it’s likely he would face some difficult challenges and problems as well.
However, besides all these points, Karzai’s government solved some problems as well in the country. The country was rebuilt, the economy strengthened, and attempts were made to create a National government. So success and failure is ultimately all in The Almighty’s power. I can say that president Karzai has worked to his best, but I will leave the analysis whether the Karzai leadership was positive or negative to the people of Afghanistan, to the international communities and to history.
Surgar:
As you have been active in politics for a long time, in your point of view, why are the Pashtun areas of the country restive and face more violence than other parts of the country? If we notice, Pashtuns have suffered more than anyone in Karzai’s government. Why and what are the reasons?
Sherzai:
You all know that the Taliban movement came from the south of the country, the Pashtun populated areas of Kandahar and Herat. The movement initiated from the south, especially from Kandahar, so most of the Taliban are from the Pashtun areas. Not only in Afghanistan, there are Pashtuns residing on the Pakistani side of the border as well. For example, 13,000 religious schools (madrasas) are built in that unsettled border region. Taliban and Al Qeada leaders first coalesced in that area and started their resistance struggle against the foreign occupiers and then the current Afghan government.
One of the other reasons why the Pashtun areas suffer more violence than any other parts of the country is the constant arrest and imprisonment of those Taliban leaders and scholars who we were supposed to be inviting to sit for peace discussions. For example, I invited the foreign affairs minister of the Taliban regime, Wakil Ahmad Mutawakil, to peace talks, but unfortunately he was made a prisoner instead, and my word was breached.
This is what increases violence and the opposition’s fight against the National government. But I have the solution for this major crisis, and I believe if it’s put into practical work, it will bring peace and the war will end. The Taliban should be invited to peace talks, and only those should be subdued and arrested who in the name of Islam have destroyed Afghanistan.
For instance, the Al Qaeda leader, Al Zhawari, who claims Afghan soil as his “own”. A while ago, he asked the U.S. president to withdraw his forces from Afghanistan. This is not his business and it stands as interference within our internal affairs. If Zhawari has problems with the US, he can go back to his own country and clear them out there.
Surgar:
Mr. Sherzai, by looking at the current violent situations in the country, foreign interference, international forces presence, the growing violence, and many other deep problems, do you see peace talks as a realistic possibility with the biggest group opposing the Afghan government, the Taliban?
Sherzai:
Absolutely Yes! But after special diplomatic missions, which should first go out to religious scholars, tribal leaders, local politicians and military officials, seeking their opinions and then be putting into practical work. These people should be made part of a joint meeting, and devise the plans. The plans should then be shared with the international communities and they should support them.
But as I mentioned earlier, if this issue is not considered seriously by the neighboring countries and occupying forces, and they are not agreed to support them, then peace talks with the Taliban become impossible. Without an effective plan, Jirgas and every other attempt at pacification have no point, and will only cause more problems by raising expectations, then failure.
Our wish is to stop more bloodshed by elders and the youth of the country, so we can see a peaceful environment spared of war.
Surgar:
Mr. Sherzai, many politicians do not agree with you. They claim as long as foreign forces stay in the country, peace talks with Taliban and other opposition groups is impossible and will not bring an end to the war. Then, on what basis do you maintain an opposing viewpoint to theirs?
Sherzai:
The situation is not as they portray it. If foreign forces leave, we will start killing each other, in an all-out civil war. Anyone who opposes talks has personal interests in maintaining the conflict in the country and don’t want to end the fighting. The international community has come to Afghanistan with a stated intention of rebuilding the country. It will not leave until it reaches its goal of restoring order. And mostly importantly, we (Afghans) should start making a peace plan, then share it with the international community, and the community should approve it so we can bring peace to our country.
In brief, if there is no assistance by the international community, we can not solve the problems on our own.
Surgar:
Some analysts believe foreigners have come to Afghanistan not to maintain peace in the country, but are supporters of a long war and for continuing violence in the country on behalf of their own private economic interests. Do you believe this is true?
Sherzai:
No, if Afghanistan is rehabilitated, gets its own National army, has a well enforced law and has the opposition force guerrillas removed and deterred against further action, the odds are high that Afghanistan will one day stand on its own feet. I can assure you, unless a strong national government is implemented in Afghanistan, foreigners’ withdrawal will be harmful for the country.
We have had this bitter experience in the past as well. When the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan (1989), that era’s president Doctor Najib’s government turned upside down, and foreigners stopped paying attention to the country. At that time, the Americans had achieved their goal, to oust Russians out of Afghanistan (in retribution for the Viet Nam War), and so they turned away.
So when the Najib government failed, a civil war emerged among the Afghans and the Taliban rose up. The unsettled situation then provided an opportunity for the neighboring countries to interfere as well. A competition of building a sought-after government was going on, and every neighboring country wanted to create an (Afghan) government of their own image.
You all have seen the ruins of that earlier war, especially in the capital Kabul. Currently, it’s the same situation in the country. If there were no foreigners, our president wouldn’t be sitting in the presidential palace now.
Surgar:
As you know, the registration process for voting in the upcoming presidential elections has already begun, and has even been completed in some provinces. But in the south of the country, the process is slow and delayed due to poor security reasons. Looking at these security problems, how concerned are you, and if you are, what do you have in mind to do for the elections?
Sherzai:
We have made some efforts in order to solve this issue. But in the begining, an exact date for the elections should be pointed out and meanwhile the international community should support the elections and provide a peaceful environment for the voting process. I have talked to the top commander of the ISAF forces who said 25,000 fresh soldiers will be deployed in the near future around Afghanistan, most in the south. I believe that the international community and the president will get together to establish an exact date for the elections, so people can make preparations to register and vote in a peaceful environment.
Surgar:
Do you agree with the delay in the elections, or you support having it proceed on the exact date?
Sherzai:
Security problems do exist. So carrying out this voting campaign for the next 120 days will face some problems. But a plan should be made ahead of the elections in order to solve the security reasons. I personally haven’t thought about either supporting the delay or holding elections on the exact date. I believe holding to the law is also important and improving security situations is also important.
Surgar:
A question about Kandahar. There are rumors that you have been asked many times to take back the position as the governor in the provincial capital, Kandahar. If these rumors are true, would you choose to be the governor of that province again?
Sherzai:
I have been asked to go back to Kandahar and carry out my job as a their governor. After the historical attack on Kandahar prison which freed hundreds of prisoners, the president asked me to come to his presidential palace and asked for my opinion in order to iron out the problems there. He said that all the security officials in that province asked him to send me back to the province.
But then, he said that I should stay in Nangarhar, which is border province with Pakistan.
Surgar:
You have mentioned that you suggested a plan for Kandahar, in order to solve the special problems in that war troubled province. Would you tell us some of the things you suggested?
Sherzai:
I suggested that a change should be brought in Kandahar security organizations. Kandahar should get an empowered governor, and representatives from the province should be invited here so they can express their problems in their own terms. They should then be asked to provide their own solutions to these problems.
Posted by: Shah Loam | Jan 14 2009 5:08 utc | 29
jonku 23) i’m still hearing that ‘soulless suburbia’ meme even today from folks too young to remember when you could walk around new york city from little italy clear up to harlem, sampling one deli after another, one basement cafe after another, one night club after another, soul food of all castes and creeds, and everyone in the street on holidays and weekends like those small pueblos in mexico used to be at christmas time, full of light and sound and dancing.
Soulless suburbia then, at least it seemed down in the village, so much going on, that was before the city of light became a city of machines, realm of financiers and property developers, gentrification and chain brandification, clear out all the street people, the music, the loitering, push them out, away, insert the traffic, neon, nothing more sterile than a giant dead christmas tree with 10,000 points of artifical light and robotic skaters twirling lifelessly in bryant park at night.
i remember a hoe-down upstate, a pot-luck and a marriage in the barn, everyone up in the hayloft getting high, pregnant bride holding the barn door closed against a sudden summer squall, happy groom, preacher reading from a nursery rhyme instead of a bible, homemade wine and ice cream, homemade beer and cider, and bluegrass fiddle music under the fireflies and glow worms phosphorescent light, long into the night.
i remember a banya party far up in the wilderness mountains beyond the last road, far at the end of the gravel, the homemade yurts, the gals all prettied up for a saturday night, big potluck dinner by lamp light, smell of herb and shroom in the air, the crackle of cedar kindling fire, then everyone naked in the sweat house together, pouring hot water on red stones and screaming at the blistering heat, jumping through a trapdoor in the floor into a glacial stream running beneath.
and so much more soul, all gone, lost, like tears in rain, or that benjamin buttons.
‘soulless suburbia, soulless city!’ this whole culture is gone dead and sterile and stinking ripe, like a bloated cow in the pasture, its legs up, prolapsed intestines pushing out the anus like a party balloon. what the hell happened to this country?!
will we wear collarless work shirts, slave for wages in some government salt mine far underground, filing reams and reels of surveillance documents away for the day when they can be “useful” for bringing some politician back in line? will we all watch American Idol and gag? will we all watch Dancing with the Stars, tears in our eyes because we can almost, almost remember when it was we who were dancing, when it was our music, our laughter, instead of RIAA’s and Clear Channels’. Will we all become biscuit thieves, ratting each other out like Winston and Julia? at the end, will we watch the fully automated UAV’s circling slowly overhead, stabbing with death lasers anyone still loitering after curfew, laughing under a lamp post?
“We have invented happiness”, say the bureaucratLast Men, and we are so tired and broken and worn and weary with this endless war against the soul that we smile.
Gob bless.
Posted by: Red Buttons | Jan 14 2009 7:48 utc | 31
b you have a national treasure museum and a fine fine bar here…
Indeed. MoA’s OT-threads are pure goldmines, this one being another leading exemplar. Even tho I’ve been quietly frequenting this bar for years, the depth and width of b’s forum still astounds me. Much appreciated.
If you refuse to see and act on that information, and you continually make excuses for our rulers calling them “incompetent,” then no matter how you view yourself, there is no difference in your effect upon the system and others, than the worst sort of reactionary.
Malooga, as always you’re putting the finger right on the wound. The apathy amongst people, the more or less silent consent, given year in year out by the ever chewing sheep in the paddock, is one of the main reasons for the dilemma mankind finds itself in today. Following our ancestors footsteps, repeating the behavior patterns which for millenniums now have allowed the balance of power to hang crooked, war and murder to go unpunished, if not rewarded. It almost seems as if it is a fundamentally human condition to walk through life with eyes wide shut.
I recently came across this profound piece of writing which I feel somehow expresses my thoughts on this existential problem much more elegantly than I ever could:
_____________________________________
Everybody knows things are bad in the world. Everything is not peachy. The problems are innumerable, the economy, our freedoms, our happiness, our quality of life, we are suffering in all aspects of life and though we hope for a better future we feel as though the things which are outside of our control will only get worse. The situation we are in is overwhelming, we feel like there is something we can do but we don’t know what to do! Whenever anyone is faced with this overwhelming situation, the question always becomes “what do we do about it?”
Do we run out on the streets? Do we protest and go on strike? People do not really know what to do, they just do nothing or else they go and look for an out to it all. They join some political party or they become religious or they start drinking or taking drugs. They try to make money or work their way out of it, or they try to pleasure their way out of it with food or sex.
There are many different paths people can take, but what they all have in common is this: Avoidance.
When a person says “what do we do about it” they are looking for an out. They want a savior to come and save them from it all, or they want to find some distant world where they escape it all. This is totally normal and perfectly reasonable. There is nothing wrong with people for feeling this way, I am as guilty of it as anyone else and I am not above it.
The problem we are in is not one of our making. Once again: the problem we are in is not one of our making. History is filled with butchery and murder, tyranny and theocratic oppression is the norm. We’ve all been born into a nightmare and we’re just now waking up to how terrifying and all encompassing it all is. We are searching for outs but there are none, we are hoping to one day wake up and find it was all a bad dream. This is why it’s not uncommon to hear the question “what do we do about it?”
There are endless people who say they have found the outs.
“It’s the economic system!” they say,
“It’s the government!” they say,
“It’s the religions!” they say.
None of these things are at the root of the problem. How do I know this? Because none of these things are actually real. History has been dominated by these three systems but what do they all have in common… ?
They are all faith-based belief systems.
Economics is not actually a science, the entire system is based on faith. If no one believed the money they or anyone else had was worth anything, it would not be worth anything. Are you starting to get the picture? It’s a belief system, it’s based on faith and nothing more. Many people realize this, what most do not realize is that “government” is the same thing. There is no such thing as a “government.” Government is an idea, to quote GHWB on the New World Order, “It is a big idea.” People think that the government is something real, they see the huge buildings and pillars and statues and they feel like it is a separate entity unto itself which rules over things. This is an illusion. And this is where we start to get to the root of the problem.
Let me introduce you to a word which is in almost no ones vocabulary. The word is hypostatized. As I type it right now my Firefox spell check says it’s not a word.
hypostatized
hy⋅pos⋅ta⋅tize
–verb (used with object), -tized, -tiz⋅ing.
to treat or regard (a concept, idea, etc.) as a distinct substance or reality.
Also, especially British, hy⋅pos⋅ta⋅tise.
Origin: 1820–30; < Gk hypostat(ós) (see hypostatic ) + -ize
This word describes the exact problem which is at the root of all other problems people believe they suffer from. We live in a faith based system, we live in a belief system, we think it is real and a distinct substance but it is not, we are only regarding it as such.
Just as the power of money would cease to exist if people did not believe in it, the power of government would cease to exist if no one believed in it. And I say that knowing what I'm talking about is a nonexistent entity which does not exist outside of peoples minds.
You see, when you understand this the problem is not what do we do about it, the problem is why have people ceased for thousands of years to realize this extremely basic fact of life? Why do people believe this nonsense and let it run their lives?
Because at the root of everything is the most basic human condition and the most basic and all pervasive of human problems, the avoidance of the obvious. Everybody knows what is wrong with the world and themselves, the problems are not complex, but people avoid the basic solutions which are staring them right in the face. They do not want to face up to the truth, they do not want the responsibility which it implies, they are afraid of life and of actually living.
This is the real problem with the world, it's blatant and it's staring you in the face. When you look at a puppy or a child they are free, they don't recognize the false belief systems and fake systems of control which we "civilized" adults all believe are basic and real, all they recognize is life, their feelings, their soul, their spirit, these things are the essence of life.
People believe themselves to be their beliefs, they say things like "I'm a Christian,"
"I'm a Democrat,"
"I'm a Philosopher,"
"I'm a Salesman,"
No. That is what you believe yourself to be. What you really are is your spirit, you are your mind, your soul, you are your feelings, you are your yearnings and your hopes and dreams. You are the spirit you had in you as a child and the spirit that is in a gallant puppy dog at the park.
You've been tricked into hypostatizing so many beliefs to the point where you actually think that they are what you are. I am here to tell you that you are not your beliefs, you need to wake up to this, this is the only thing keeping you from being truly free…
__________________________
Truly free, huh? At that point I think the piece drifts slightly into the metaphysical and therefore imho also slightly out of context. I mean, "Freedom", try to define it. For me freedom has always been more a question of time than of location, being able to leave when I want overrides the freedom to go where I want. Anyway, as important as philosophical discourse is, it's besides the point, very little relevance to the actual suffering I set out to address.
Mankind was doomed the moment the first time a man rammed a stake into the ground proclaiming it to be his now, and everybody else believed him. With land comes wealth and power, peasants who'd pay taxes. Taxes buy warriors, which rob more land. From AD to BC, right up to today, Iraq, Palestine, the story hasn't changed. The actors have, the fashion of clothes has, but the script has been the same, it appears forever.
Collectively we need to wake up to the comforting fact that without us, the worker bees, the obscenely wealthy parasites in their security patrolled uptown residences would not be able to exist. As a species, we need to discover a sense of responsibility, stop blaming others, and start to actively contribute to the revolution that is needed to bring back equal rights.
And our sanctimonious politicians just sit by nodding their heads together in agreement like a pack of Bobble-headed dolls riding in the back seat of an israel tank.
That is right, but lets not forget that we knew that Israel would attack again, we knew that the politicians we voted in would be sitting there with their nodding heads agreeing to the mayhem. And yet we voted for them. Which by my deduction means we are at fault. I repeat, we are at fault. Why? Because we have the power to change things but don’t use it.
Our complacent and spineless governments exist because we put them there in the first place, don’t do jack shit about their shocking performances, re-elect them even, letting one generation of war criminals after another walk scot-free. Sad but true, the blame lies with us, for believing in and thus enabling our heartless system. The public discourse is impregnated with petty issues, leading upfront the most trivial issue, even well before what type of cocktail Paris Hilton had three weeks ago, the Democrat v. Republican charade. Almost the entire civic bandwidth is taken up by us discussing the minuscule differences between two parties, fully falling for the sham. Instead we could be thinking, discussing, formulating alternative forms of government and wealth distribution, much to the despair of our incestuous elites.
Public opinion is the elephant in the room. In order to sway it, we need to do the job the MSM is not doing, conveying the awful truth. In order to get the population’s attention, and Obama can confirm this, any revolutionary movement would need a lotta cash. To gain the citizenry’s attention, for the heads to rise from the feeding trough, the messages has to be loud, and the MSM sells exactly that, volume. If we, the ones pissed off enough with the current system that we stopped believing in it, start to believe in ourselves instead, embraced our civil strength and reach, we would in no time be able to fill a war chest with all the silver needed to spread the word.
Should BO or HRC only mention the words invasion or military intervention, mass strikes across the nation need to convey the people’s message that those days are well and truly over and any further steps in that direction would mean a run on the banks and large scale civil disobedience. Maybe I am just waffling here, but I do believe that where there is a will there is a way. Where is the will?
Posted by: Juan Moment | Jan 14 2009 21:06 utc | 46
An idea has recently coalesced in my mind regarding the election of Obama. I’ve come to the conclusion that many of his supporters are really closet racists and probably don’t even realize it.
The reason I say this is from my experience of waking up to my own racist beliefs, which, up until the time I met Vernal, I’d never admitted to having.
Vernal was one of the group of twenty-somethings I’d hangout with to drink beers when I’d get off work serving the lunch counter at Moma’s, down on Gerry St in SF (that’s for you annie.)
Those were good times: It was ’95 and the earthquake almost forgotten, the city less than 70% occupied, rents were cheap (I lived in my van anyway, it was even cheaper) the Cannabis Club was still located in a small upstairs loft between the Lower Haight and the Castro District, but one could feel the changes coming faster and faster (during the eight months I’d lived there, the population boomed and rents went back up.)
Almost every night I’d drink beers at the studio apartment of two brothers on walkabout from Australia. The group hanging-out there most often and drinking were; a girl from Columbia; a white kid from South Africa; Vernal, the black kid most recently from Atlanta; a couple of girls from Argentina; a kid from Peru, and the random flotsam of searching humans, all having washed-up in San Francisco from Somewhere Else and had found this strange little spot to drink.
One night I’d asked Vernal where he was from and he told me that he’d lived in San Diego, Seattle, Virginia and Florida with his family, and had went to collage in Georgia, which is how he ended up in Atlanta. I made a quick assessment of the places he’d lived, his skin color, and since he’d moved so much, I took a stab and asked, “Was your dad in the military?”
He laughed and said, “I’ve been moved.”
“Huh?”
Me, having grown-up country, didn’t get the reference, but then Vernal explained that his dad had worked for, “IBM…I’ve Been Moved, get it?”
I shall never forget that moment. It was then I realized how insidious racism is, how it is part of every human to some degree, and often it isn’t even noticed. I found it ironic that this black guy had grown-up even whiter and more middle-class than I had. I grew-up somewhere between food stamps and government cheese (what an ungrateful wretch I turned-out to be) and I’d just assumed that his dad was a military guy because Vernal was educated, well spoken and well, black.
We learn, but there is still more learning for me to do, that’s for sure.
Now, after that damn, longwinded soliloquy, how does having voted for Obama make a person racist?
It is in how they chose to perceive Obama as a “black” candidate and all the labels that go along with it. Think about what everyone has assumed about Obama because he’s black. Most folks expect, and hope, that he’ll be a big change. They can’t believe Obama won’t be any different than the rest of the nincompoops we’ve elected since president Reagan, ONLY because he’s black. A black democrat has got to be better than those white republicans, right? No, he doesn’t, and will probably be the last nail in the coffin of American politics.
I feel, despite all the “static noise” during the election, Obama was selected president four-years-ago when he gave the speech that “launched” his career at the convention. One might even think of that as his first acceptance speech, everything since has been the dog and pony show.
Obama was chosen because he is black. The powers that be knew Obama would be able to use his race as an advantage against any criticism. One doesn’t want to be labeled a racist any more than anti-semitic and this fact should play well during the next four or eight years.
I didn’t vote for Obama, but regardless of that, I too hoped that he might be something different. I realize now, any hope is probably for naught.
While he was running, I thought if he won he’d invite a lot of diverse people to come join him at the table of American politics, but since the election I see most of us are again going to be dodging the diner’s boots while fighting each other for crumbs on the floor.
One of the photos I cherish more everyday is the one I shot of my voting card with the vote for Cynthia colored in, nice and black.
Posted by: David | Jan 17 2009 5:38 utc | 72
|