Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 18, 2009
Gaza Song – We Will Not Go Down!

Thank to Parviz for the link.


We will not go down
In the night, without a fight
You can burn up our mosques and our homes and our schools
But our spirit will never die
We will not go down
In Gaza tonight

Photo comparison

Comments

Shukran gazilan.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 18 2009 20:26 utc | 1

I have just written to Stop the War asking them to help me encourage him to release this as a single. If we can get into the charts in Europe we can embarrass the Israelis and the European governments.

Posted by: mo | Jan 18 2009 23:13 utc | 2

Isreal should immediately withdraw and allow the Varoius Palestinian factions to kill eachother. Yea, just brilliant. If Israel ever ends, then you will see some seroius Palestinian bloodshed, exclusively at
oneanothers hands.

Posted by: x | Jan 19 2009 0:06 utc | 3

When I first watched/listened to it Parviz i fought hard not to also shed a tear to be able to keep on keeping on. I’ve emailed it off to contacts who i think might watch and get it.
b,
Thanks for headlineing it. your ‘photo comparison’ link says it all again, what so desperately needs to be heard.
My heart is wrent but I feel hopeful because of sources still speaking truth to power.
Thanks both and all

Posted by: Juannie | Jan 19 2009 0:42 utc | 4

I,m afraid it will take many generations of this before anything changes. Still, too many people here in the U$ no nothing of the struggles of the palistenians, or even care. So very tragic.

Posted by: ben | Jan 19 2009 1:10 utc | 5

thank you Parviz, i receive this from my palestinian update email list while i had the flu, and being too out of it i bookmarked the youtube site and also went to the singer/songwriter’s site. i was going to post it when i had the energy, but then forgot all about it as the 2 weeks of flu is all a fog in my mind. so thank you very mcu for the reminder..
art. art moves things like hearts. thank you mo, yes, hopefully we could really make a difference promoting this song.

Posted by: annie | Jan 19 2009 3:04 utc | 6

good grief, did they shoot at kids directly?
the first picture,
link
i am sick of war, just sick of it. Sick of War Memorials, the tomb of the unknown soldier, exhibitions of tanks and shows with fighter planes that rain death, sick of barked orders, collateral damage, arrogant man and women who tell us its for our safety, our well being, sick sick sick fuckers all of them.
We should erect monuments with the names of every dead child and every dead women engraved. Would we have enough space?

Posted by: sabine | Jan 19 2009 9:07 utc | 7

The world is a sick place (understatement). It is only in blogs like this one that one can sense kindred spirits and hope that one day we can influence others enough to make a real difference. If we can prick the consciences of our very near and dear close family members and friends, and they do the same with theirs, a global grass roots movement may spring up and one day help to greatly reduce, if not terminate, the bloodletting.

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 19 2009 9:29 utc | 8

All councils of war should be selected from expectant mothers…

Posted by: David | Jan 19 2009 10:55 utc | 9

Here is a link to a page of angry bible quotes. Whoever compiled this list has a pretty good sense of humor which makes reading the words of an angry god easier.
Link to quotes
These quotes are part of the reason there is so much hate, and these are all from the bible.

Posted by: David | Jan 19 2009 11:55 utc | 10

@sabine
“good grief did they shoot at kids directly?”
Are you serious with this comment? Israel has been shooting directly at Palestinian kids in the occupied territories (West Bank and Gaza) since at least the first intifada in 1987. Kids are killed routinely. If you would like more source material on this please let me know.
Honestly I realize this situation is not as well-known as I assume it is….

Posted by: bea | Jan 19 2009 12:16 utc | 11

@b
Troll alert
FYI.

Posted by: bea | Jan 19 2009 12:22 utc | 12

David, I have similar, even more horrific quotes from the Talmud and the Koran which created waves on this Blog some months ago.
Can there be any other conclusion other than that the Bible/Koran/Talmud are all crap?

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 19 2009 12:25 utc | 13

Parviz-
Like all things of man it depends on point of view. If you’re a fascist leaning propagandist nothing could be better than the “word of god” to help you sell your cesspool of feces. Talk about celebrity endorsements.
Like me, I’m sure you also realize that “an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind”

Posted by: David | Jan 19 2009 12:39 utc | 14

Parviz,
Please we get enough of this with “im not racist but” gang at abu muqawama. We all have our beliefs and our interpretation of our beliefs. There can be a whole many more conclusions than the one you draw and like David says then the “word of God” sells as well as anything. But just because the seller is evil and is able to twist a phrase or paragraph to their agenda and the buyer is too angry/undeducated/of equal bent to counter the seller, does not necessarily lead to the original belief being anything of the sort. I do not equate Bush with Christianiy, nor Israel with Judaism and I would certainly not expect anyone to equate Al Qaeda and Islam

Posted by: mo | Jan 19 2009 13:38 utc | 15

@sabine
‘Good grief they’re not shooting at kids are they?
Everyone should watch this amazing video of ISM’s Huwaida Arraf confronting Israeli soldiers in the West Bank – from january 2008.

Posted by: bea | Jan 19 2009 13:49 utc | 16

mo (15), I see what you’re getting at, but to be perfectly frank I see organized religions as mere instruments of power, nothing more, nothing less. For me (and I may be wrong) Buddhism comes closest to my idea of a religion that teaches people to think for themselves, surpassed possibly only by Zoroastrianism that had only 3 Commandments and rules: “Think good thoughts, Say good words, do good deeds”. Unfortunately, it has almost died out as a religion because Zoroastrians wre allowed to marry only other Zoros (not Zorros!), whicu was rather contradictory to their very enlightened 3 Commandments. But I love the simplicity of their basic principles.
All that crap about ‘heathens’, Heaven and Hell, the sea parting to allow Moses through, Mohammed receiving totally self-contradictory instructions from God, the Talmud’s 500 pages on capital punishment that would make even Stephen King’s hair stand on end, etc.,. don’t belong in the 21st century.
As I always say, there would have been no Inquisition without Christians, no Al Qaeda without Muslims and no Holocaust without Jews. All 3 religions encourage stupidity, ignorance and violence, so, thanks but no thanks. A plague on all their houses.

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 19 2009 15:22 utc | 17

Here, Here.

Posted by: David | Jan 19 2009 15:53 utc | 18

What the Israelis don’t realize is that, unlike in Nazi Germany where the Jews meekly succumbed to their fate (often there were only 10 German camp guards covering 1000 Jews but the Jews were too scared to take them on, so they died anyway at no cost to the Nazis), the Palestinians will use whatever means at their disposal (slings, stones, crude weapons) to make sure they take some of the Israeli bastards down with them.
If the Israelis expect Palestinians to behave like the Jews did in Germany, they’re very much mistaken, which is why Israel cannot win. It’s carved in stone.

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 19 2009 16:14 utc | 19

Parviz, I respect your opinion and your beliefs and even what you wish to believe about the monotheistic religions.
But as I always say, had there been no Christians, Muslims or Jews, those that were pyscopathic enough to commit their crimes “in the name of their God” would still have been psycopaths and would still have commited the atrocities that they did only with a different excuses. Stalin and Pol Pot did not need religion to commit their atrocities but would have happily used if that had been the biggest sellers in their neighborhood.
Nothing done in the inquisition is justified in the Bible; nothing Al Qaeda does is justified in the Quran.

Posted by: mo | Jan 19 2009 17:04 utc | 20

there would have been no Inquisition without Christians, no Al Qaeda without Muslims and no Holocaust without Jews.<(I>
Now that is wrong Parviz on several counts.
You can not blame the Jews for the holocaust. The way you constructed the above (unintended I believe) does that.
Many, many Jews killed in the holocaust were a-religious and atheists. The holocaust has not to do with religion but with race, like with the Roma and Sinti.

Posted by: b | Jan 19 2009 18:17 utc | 21

bea, i saw that one, and was very much impressed by the young woman.
but that first photo on my lnk, that does not look like shrapnel.
i have no idea what bullet wounds look like really, i don’t shoot, nor own a gun or such.
but these holes are so small. it does not look like the kid died under bombs or something. and he is so little, they are all so little.
Joan Baez – Kinder („Sind so kleine Hände…”)-live-

Posted by: sabine | Jan 19 2009 18:22 utc | 22

bea, to finish up
maybe i should have said “they targeting toddlers”,
i didn’t even name the link – how to name that link to do it justice.
obviously i can still be shocked and horrified. in fact my words sound hollow and never strong enough for my horror.

Posted by: sabine | Jan 19 2009 18:36 utc | 23

mo, psychopaths are far more lethal when their energies are channelled by monotheistic religious leaders quoting the Holy Books. There is no “school for psychopaths” as far as I know, so mass murderers, serial killers and the like work independently and their potential for causing harm is strictly limited to their own actions UNLESS AND UNTIL their energies are channelled into a far more cohesive, lethal force “in the name of God”.
Priests quoted the Bible during the Inquisition, and there are numerous passages in the Koran basically stating what amounts to “the only good non-believer is a dead one”. Now, there are also passages in the Koran stating that People of the Book (= the Jews and Christians) are to be respected and treated just like Muslims, but the Wahhabi sect in particular cites only those passages, verbatim, that suit its deadly purpose. As for the Talmud, well, I can quote you passages that will make your stomach churn.
Communism was merely another instrument of subjugation, a religion revealed very quickly as a fraud. Christianity/Islam and Judaism haven’t yet been exposed as frauds, despite thousands of years of barbaric religious wars (still continuing in the 21st century), so they’re far more dangerous than communism, pol-potism, Maoism and any other -ism.
The very good Christians/Jews/Muslims we know are good IN SPITE OF their Holy Books. Do you think that Mother Theresa would have been a serial murderer if she hadn’t been a ‘Christian’?
mo, have you ever really stopped to think how insufferably arrogant each of the monotheistic religions is, each holding itself up as the only ‘true’ religion? There’s no way you can possibly believe in all 3, because the Jews abhor Christ, the Muslims totally reject the Holy Trinity and the Old Testament is a load of superstitious babble.
To make matters worse, each of the above religions is its own worst enemy since they all suffer schisms (orthodox vs. liberal jews, sunni-shi’ite, catholic-protestant, etc.,.) and fight among themselves for the right to lead the sheep. I am neither a sheep nor a goat, so I don’t need a shepherd, thank you very much.

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 19 2009 18:44 utc | 24

parviz
as b says – in fact european jewry – especially east european jewry lived their religion deeply as precepts – but only rarely as a religion – circumstances made that the case, circumstances made the greater majority of east european jewry – secular & socialist
it is a rich history
& that is one of the aspects of israels brutality & terror that does dishonour to that history
but it seems there are those of a messianic bent who want another masada & seek it every opportunity

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 19 2009 18:45 utc | 25

b, 21, you missed my point but correctly gave me credit for not meaning that the Jews were to blame for the Holocaust. I intended to make a simple statement of logic: If Islam hadn’t existed, would Islamic terrorism have existed? If the Jewish religion hadn’t existed, would Hitler have had such an easy and identifiable target? Yes, I know about the Roma, homosexuals and other victims, but the 6 million Jews were indisputably victims of their prominent organized religion.
Please demonstrate to me how 6 million people would have been gassed/killed if there hadn’t been any means to identify them other than via their faith? Same applies to Muslims in during the Spanish Inquisition.
I know it’s a touchy subject, but my statement was attempting to be unemotionally logical.

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 19 2009 18:52 utc | 26

it was a race war as was the whole war against the east, parviz. jews were identified more by their poverty than by their faith. they were indeed secular & political
it was a race war
& it was a resource war

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 19 2009 19:47 utc | 27

remembereringgiap@27
All wars are resource wars.
The reason the people fight is because their leaders can convince them that some “other” (race, religion, culture, ect) poses the gravest of threats to their well being. The leaders don’t care who ends up as the victim, so long as the victim is weak and powerless (who wants to fight a fair fight?) The people convinced to fight in these “label” wars, rationalize it anyway they can. If it helps them to feel better about killing a person because they’re a “blank”, then they’ll fill that blank with any label that works, be it religious, political or whatever.
Think of proto religion as the first organizing force which was able to manipulate mankind’s thinking and enabled the population to grow beyond an extended family/hunter/gather/tribal group into the eventual early city-states.
Agriculture allowed for a fairly consistent food supply; religion then became the beginning of social rules and a people’s cultural identity that made it much easier to manipulate larger and larger herds of humans.
Most religions, races, cultures and political beliefs (not to mention sports teams, social clubs, and other labels) are ways to separate peoples, not bring them together. The labels we choose are pretty much the biggest difference in who we are.
Humans are like tap water and the labels we use are the different containers we use to contain water, it might be a pink, green or yellow bottle but the water inside is the same.

Posted by: David | Jan 19 2009 21:01 utc | 28

More…
Children found with bullets lodged in their heads

Posted by: bea | Jan 19 2009 21:45 utc | 29

‘Israel breaks the ceasefire again’
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:24:50 GMT
Israeli navy gunships shell at Western coast of Northern Gaza.
Israeli naval gunship vessels have violated the uneasy truce with Hamas, opening fire at the western coast of northern Gaza Strip.
Palestinian residents living at the western coast of northern Gaza City said Israeli naval gunship vessels opened fire at their houses in western Gaza Strip on Monday morning, AFP reported.
No casualties have been reported yet.
The breach of the ceasefire comes as many Palestinians are returning to their town while most houses are completely razed to the ground due to the 22-day massive air strikes by Israel.
Hamas announced a week-long ceasefire in response to Israel seeking to unilaterally end its war without having achieved any of the objectives it had previously sought.
The Hamas ceasefire will be in effect for one week, allowing Israeli troops to withdraw from the impoverished territory.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert declared on Sunday Israel’s willingness to drawdown troops from Gaza before the new US President Barack Obama takes office officially on Tuesday Jan 20
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=82950&sectionid=351020601

Posted by: brian | Jan 19 2009 23:25 utc | 30

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0MF-DKLKk

Posted by: mattes | Jan 20 2009 0:39 utc | 31

mattes it has been censored whatever it is

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 20 2009 0:49 utc | 32

amazing, I just got a taste of censorship. the video mattes links to is flagged at youtube. I actually created an account so that I could see it and found to my surprise a young man narrating what has been said here wrt the Israeli assault on Gaza. no profanity other than the pictures of dead people and destroyed buildings and nothing antisemetic other than asking why Israel is the only country on the face of the earth that can get away with such crap without mention in the press.

Posted by: dan of steele | Jan 20 2009 1:04 utc | 33

DoS
I checked out the same video over at What Really Happened.com, they link it on their front page and it plays from there.
Link to WRH
It’s not censorship if corporations do it – just evil.

Posted by: David | Jan 20 2009 1:31 utc | 34

David, I don’t think the IDF snuff videos were censored at the end.
Here is “Gaza in Winter”:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/worldnews/4290469/In-pictures-Gaza-City-a-scene-of-destruction-as-the-Israeli-offensive-ends.html

Posted by: mattes | Jan 20 2009 2:03 utc | 35

It likely is censorship – you guys heard about the deal between You Tube and the ADL, did you not?
And another report on this is here.

Posted by: bea | Jan 20 2009 3:38 utc | 36

Superb commentary by Uri Avneri about the film “Waltz with Bashir”. Here is an excerpt:
The subject of this outstanding film is one of the darkest chapters in our history: the Sabra and Shatila massacre. In the course of Lebanon War I, a Christian Lebanese militia carried out, under the auspices of the Israeli army, a heinous massacre of hundreds of helpless Palestinian refugees who were trapped in their camp, men, women, children and old people. The film describes this atrocity with meticulous accuracy, including our part in it.
All this was not even mentioned in the news about the award. At the festive ceremony, the director of the film did not avail himself of the opportunity to protest against the events in Gaza. It is hard to say how many women and children were killed while this ceremony was going on – but it is clear that the massacre in Gaza is much worse than that 1982 event, which moved 400 thousand Israelis to leave their homes and hold a spontaneous mass protest in Tel-Aviv. This time, only 10 thousand stood up to be counted.

Link

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 20 2009 5:21 utc | 37

I don’t know why the link didn’t work. b, can you help? It’s an extraordinary commentary by a brilliant and honest intellectual:
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1232152100/

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 20 2009 5:23 utc | 38


Uri Avneri Commentary – Well worth reading

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 20 2009 5:26 utc | 39

b, when I obey the link instructions it omits the hyphen between ‘gush’ and ‘shalom’. Please help. The lionk in post 33 is correct.

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 20 2009 5:28 utc | 40

Parviz, sometimes the internet wins and you just have to find the article elsewhere. You are correct, it is a superb commentary:
Uri Avnery Commentary

Posted by: Ensley | Jan 20 2009 6:03 utc | 41

Avigdor Liebermann to Haaretz

“What was achieved here? Zip, nada. The strategic objective of the operation should have been the collapse of Hamas. This goal could have been reached not by capturing Gaza and Jabalya, but [simply] by taking over the crossing points and the Philadelphi route. There are enough forces in Gaza that could serve as an alternative to Hamas. When Hamas is dominant, those forces are silent. But if we had closed the Strip in a vice, we would have strangled Hamas.”
But Hamas was stricken, Gaza was destroyed, we proved that we can behave just as savagely as Vladimir Putin’s Russia.
“When the war between Russia and Georgia ended, no one asked who won and who lost. But here, after the cease-fire, everyone wants to know how it could be that the strongest army in the Middle East was unable to overcome 12,000 terrorists. The result is similar to that of the Second Lebanon War: damage to our deterrent capability. Instead of destroying Hamas, the operation upgraded it, turning it into an important regional player. It’s only a matter of time before the government in Ramallah collapses and falls into Hamas hands. Within a year, we’ll have an upgraded Hezbollah in Gaza, not a weak Hamas. That Hezbollah will have hundreds of rockets that reach central Tel Aviv. Ultimately, rockets will hit the Kirya [government complex] and Azrieli [towers].”
Do you expect another conflict within the year?
“Without a shadow of a doubt. I think Hamas will aim for a time when it has instruments that will reach Ben-Gurion airport, the Kirya and Dimona.”

Posted by: sabine | Jan 20 2009 6:14 utc | 42

A superbly eloquent and poignant commentary. Excerpt:
And please, Israel, try to restrain yourself from using that ridiculous argument, borrowed again from Bush (how low can you get?), that Hamas leaders “hide among civilians”, by living in their own homes. Apparently, in the thinking of Israelis, they should all run out into an uninhabited area somewhere (try to find one in Gaza), surround themselves with flares and write in the sand with a stick, “Here I am!”

Huffingtom Post

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 20 2009 7:48 utc | 43

sabine,
Ive seen lots of bullet wounds and those looks like a bullet holes to me. The entry wound is usually the diameter of the bullet (small), but since the bullets are designed to “tumble” the move through flesh eratically, like dropping a penny in water. The exit wound is entirely different, sometimes the size of a grapefruit. (sorry)

Posted by: anna missed | Jan 20 2009 8:16 utc | 44

thanks anna missed,
its kind of a strange feeling, one hears, one sees, on knows, but still seeks confirmation of the unspeakable.
shooting toddlers in the year 2009

Posted by: sabine | Jan 20 2009 9:05 utc | 45

The Yri Avneri statement is dead on. The “mad boss” metaphor is a perfect description on what otherwise is typical vicious circle reasoning. The kind of flawed reasoning made infamous with the “destroy the village to save the village” that continues to plague the U.S. government in its equally insane “war on terror”. Israel has it seems, managed to polish the syndrome into something yet more blinding and horrific in its purity. On the individual level this is the reasoning of addiction, addiction to drugs, violence, money, vice, or graft. Where the individual comes under the spell of an activity that can never be satiated, the object of the activity never resolved, and so the activity itself replaces, or becomes the object. This then exacerbates the problem and demands an ever greater act in a spiral of escalation, spinning off more and greater problems. This kind of behavior is not hard to identify, and when it shows itself in the character of political leaders it should be treated like a disease, because that’s what it is, a fucking cancer of the mind that kills not only the perpetrator but all those around it.

Posted by: anna missed | Jan 20 2009 9:19 utc | 46

poetry for the little ones killed via the angry arab
they claimed that it was morning
and again on the news, “israel only shoots at schools, if they are shot at”, and Mrs. Livni is “at peace with the actions of Israel”.

Posted by: sabine | Jan 20 2009 9:46 utc | 47

Israel Defense Forces officers supervising the pullout of troops from Gaza yesterday were working to have the last Israeli soldier leave Gaza today before the Washington, D.C., inauguration of United States President Barack Obama.
I find this very strange. Israel would not normally be in a hurry to pull out. Indeed, they are risking the results of the war (if there are any – but I’m not discussing that point).
I wonder really whether this is not an Obaman insistance on the quiet. I know you are all very acid about Obama. But I do find it strange that Israel seems to be acting against its own interests. That has not happened for a long time.

Posted by: Alex | Jan 20 2009 10:20 utc | 48

@am – spot on
Zogby How Israel’s Propaganda Machine Works

Posted by: b | Jan 20 2009 10:30 utc | 49

Amid dust and death, a family’s story speaks for the terror of war

But most disturbing of all was the graffiti they daubed on the walls of the ground floor. Some was in Hebrew, but much was naively written in English: “Arabs need 2 die”, “Die you all”, “Make war not peace”, “1 is down, 999,999 to go”, and scrawled on an image of a gravestone the words: “Arabs 1948-2009”.

Absolutely horrible, what is recounted in this article.

Posted by: Alex | Jan 20 2009 10:38 utc | 50

The truth is overtaking the Propaganda Machine. Avnery had it right. Nobody is going to forget what happened in Gaza.

Posted by: Alex | Jan 20 2009 10:48 utc | 51

b, this is a superb, satirical anti-Israeli article by one of German’s most prominent Jews, unfortunately only in German, but German speakers will appreciate it:

“The Bad, Bad, Neighbour”

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 20 2009 11:51 utc | 52

I am watching the most extraordinary speech in Gaza, live on Al Jazeera, in which Ban Ki-Moon expresses “complete solidarity with the people of Gaza”, expresses ‘outrage’ at the waston killing and ‘promises’ to conduct “strong, thorough investigations” and make those people responsible “accountable for the destruction and shelling of this small place”.
He demanded “an immediate end to the occupation” and “creation of a Palestinian State”, “an immediate 2-state solution”, promising to “take this up with the new U.S. President immediately”. He expressed “condolences to the people of Gaza” for “your suffering and the destruction of your infrastructure” and promised urgent action “so you can live normally, get jobs, go to school”, etc.,. He said he was at a loss for words to describe what he has seen and admitted that this was only a ‘fraction’ of the damage done to Gaza.
Now, to many of you these may seem like empty words, but considering Kim’s loyalties and staid character this was like a “declaration of war” against both Israel and the United States. I wish he had spoken out as soon as he was appointed General Secretary, but as with the Jews rising up against Israel it’s again a question of “better late than never”.

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 20 2009 13:43 utc | 53

Parviz, what a find
“Der bad, bad Neighbour”
Point5; You took away the bad bad neighbours car.
The bad bad Neighbour once had an airport – build with money from the EU. You have destroyed that Airport: Bad Neighbours don’t need an airport.
Point6: You took away the neighbours work
Once, he neighbour went fishing. You don’t allow him that anymore. The neighbour used to have factories. You bombed them in 2006. He used to have Agriculture. You have ruined that, by not allowing export. The bad neighbour who only wants to shoot, is not supposed to go fishing, to go work, to work the soil.
The bad bad Neighbour is supposed to shoot at you, so that you can shoot back. And this is what the Neighbour did.
what a good find. to much to translate for early morning, on my way to work. if need i can do this tonight.

Posted by: Sabine | Jan 20 2009 18:25 utc | 54

Discussions about peace, ending the occupation, a two state solution, etc. from the softie-lefties are often repetitive and tiresome (present company excepted.) They seem to concern symptoms or outcomes, and how these may be tempered or undone – cease-fires, peace conferences, 67 borders, tearing down the serpent wall, etc., just more of the same tepid boy-scoutism. It often reminds me of what one does with unruly kindergarteners – Time out, shaking hands, sharing the same space, offering toys! Those who see Isr. as a monster that must be stopped and somehow de-fanged I find more sympathetic. Boycotts. By all means, why not.
The heart of the story is racism. It is ethnic racism, but of a peculiar kind, as it is for a large part self-proclaimed (“I am a Jew”) and carries few or no biological, territorial, cultural, historical markers. (Some might dispute this so let’s say ‘weak’ instead.) The religious aspect is superficial – though Judaism is the State religion – most Jews are ‘secular’ and only 8% in Isr. call themselves ultra-orthodox. In fact, one might praise Israel for the fact that such wildly different attitudes to religion or more properly patriarchy and quasi-medieval tradition as well as vociferous victim status seem to co-exist peacefully in such a tiny country.
From the coked-up gay metro Tel-Aviver who works in finance … to the ultra-Orthodox whose customs even fervent Islamists consider nuts. Only El Al runs ‘religious’ flights, reserved for the orthodox. (Not sure if that still exists..) Naturally, the co-existence is one of mutual ignorance and avoidance with occasional flare-ups. (E.g. gay parades.)
Overall, this dimension seems to me to be very muted – each group identifies with its members parochially, such as settlers in their modest clothes to pious Jewish folklore and their near neighbors; academics internationally with their brethren worldwide; business people with another country, the US, etc. (This also explains that Isr. garners support because it has a little of everything for everyone…) Religion is a supra-ordinal State definition but never a goal on the ground, even in its mild community versions.
Second, it is nationalistic racism. Now, there is something to get one’s teeth into. Nation states evolved slowly, and EU colonialism was a way of garnering the means of production and profiteering while using racist stereotypes. Others – e.g. the US, Australia – killed off native populations and took over the territory, the land. Isr. necessarily has veered between the two models neither of which are politically correct or even much in vogue today … It adopts a model that is past is sell-date, as a kind of hyperbolic vestige of early European Nationalism, very narrowly defined and then transposed into another context. Gaza has no UN seat. Israel does.
Third, once discrimination kicks in, those outside the favored group can be counted on to look ugly, uneducated, primitive, criminal and violent; as a group, terrorists, menacing… The narrow definition of the State (that supports the life of its citizens, workers, etc.) is upheld by the majority, for the sake of survival, and the minority must be eliminated. Bloody extreme violence can, as we see, result.
And this, my friends, is what other countries – the US in first place – meaning leaders, politicians, in finance, and large corps – love.
Isr. is supported because it is supremely aggressive, domineering, powerful on a small scale, and goes on killing (depriving, blockading, bombing, disenfranchising, etc.) people who are simply there. Its PR machine is supreme (victim BS).. a wet dream…Its complete allegiance to whatever the PTB can dream up is hallucinating…it folds and bends…while the powerful live in defended compounds, no! in London or NY, and can get others to kill ppl on the street, nobody peeps, even if food is destroyed by bombs, that’s an achievement!
All for the sake of a Jewish homeland, a chimera, an invention that serves only a tiny class of criminals at the top. Nobody, not Bush or Obama, or the Sark (ozy), or anyone, cares about Israelis or Palestinians.
There can be no ‘peace’ while the modern creation, at the same time a complete anachronism, of a ‘country’ like Israel exists.
Not very original I know but these thoughts were swirling in my mind. ..

Posted by: Tangerine | Jan 20 2009 18:44 utc | 55

Sabine, you’re my heroine for making such an offer. I can’t wait to read everyone’s comments on the translation. It blew me off my chair but my translation skills can’t do justice to the piece.
Good luck and THANKS!

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 20 2009 18:48 utc | 56

Parviz wrote: What the Israelis don’t realize is that, unlike in Nazi Germany where the Jews meekly succumbed to their fate (often there were only 10 German camp guards covering 1000 Jews but the Jews were too scared to take them on, so they died anyway at no cost to the Nazis), the Palestinians will use whatever means at their disposal (slings, stones, crude weapons) to make sure they take some of the Israeli bastards down with them.
Not quite correct. First, rests on the popular, promulgated, image of Nazi ‘genocide’, etc. but huge numbers of Jews /others did escape and protect themselves, and also resisted.. Some did meekly succumb, sure, but the numbers, etc. Well let’s not go there now, taboo topic.
It is so they threw no stones and weren’t shown on CNN. My ancestors killed – killed – when they could in any way – nobody ever talks about that –
Second, the political-economic-cultural scene has changed completely since ww2.
Potted history and school book lore and outdated comparisons…
just in the spirit of argument, Parviz..

Posted by: Tangerine | Jan 20 2009 18:59 utc | 57

Tangerine, thanks for clarifying this point. I knew there was a Jewish Resistance, but I’d always been led to believe (and the Nazi films of that period seem to confirm this) that the prisoners in the camps massively outweighed their guards.
Also, if the Jews had been as hard-headed and brave/wild as the Muslims the Nazis would have needed 100 times the military personnel to guard the camps, which would have weakened the war effort. I mean, just compare Guantanamo, in which 5 burly guards accompany a single chained and handcuffed ‘enemy non-combatant’ (Jeez!) even when he leaves his cell for 5 minutes (and most of the prisoners were actually innocent and released after a few years). The Jews, in comparison, seemed resigned to their fate, and this resignation and defeatism have been portrayed by every film-maker since the war, including Spielberg.
I cannot imagine 1000 Muslim or Hindu or Buddhist prisoners being ordered around by 10 guards, even at the point of a gun. But maybe I’m wrong.

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 20 2009 19:22 utc | 58

parviz, do you have a place i can send the translation to, it will be rather long. to long to post here i think.

Posted by: sabine | Jan 20 2009 20:54 utc | 59

Sabine, why not email it to b and let him decide. He liked the original and may decide to post the translation. His email is MoonofA_at_aol_dot_com

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 20 2009 21:01 utc | 60

Travel advisory issued for top IDF officers

State expresses concern over international human rights groups’ intention to file war crimes charges against military personnel with The Hague, local European courts; says officers planning to travel must contact Judge Advocate General’s Office first.
IDF officers intending to travel to Europe, whether for business or pleasure, have been advised to contact the Judge Advocate General’s Office prior to leaving Israel; and some may be instructed not to leave the country.
The advisory has been issued following Israel’s concern that international arrest warrants may be issued against officers who were involved in the Israeli offensive in Gaza, on charges of war crimes.

Jerusalem has reportedly received several reports suggesting international human rights groups are in the process of gathering evidence in the form of photos and testimonials, with the intent of filing suits both with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague and in local European courts.
Once a European court decides to hear such a case, it is within its right to issue bench warrants for the alleged criminals – in this case top politicians and military personnel – and that is a move the State might find difficult to undo.
“As far as the international arena is concerned, Israel is entering what is probably its darkest era,” a Jerusalem source told Yedioth Ahronoth. “The Palestinian and their friends will try to make Israel look like a leper, like China looked after the Tiananmen Square massacre (of 1989), or like Serbia did under (former President Slobodan) Milosevic.
“They intend of mounting a legal front against IDF officers, ministers, Knesset members and Israeli diplomats. They will go after them with arrest warrants all over the world.”

Posted by: annie | Jan 20 2009 23:52 utc | 61

b, my last 2 links have not shown up, can you look for them, i am reluctant to repost.

Posted by: annie | Jan 20 2009 23:53 utc | 62

@annie – , my last 2 links have not shown up, can you look for them, i am reluctant to repost.
I don’t find them. They were not “spam captured” ???

Posted by: b | Jan 21 2009 7:18 utc | 63

Parviz,
i have translated the bad, bad neighbour and send it to B. it is up to him now to decide to use it or not. You can always give me a shout, and i send it to you.

Posted by: Sabine | Jan 21 2009 8:21 utc | 64

Terrific, Sabine, that was very selfless. I speak German so I understood the text, but my translation skills are not that hot, so I appreciate your effort. If B doesn’t post it I’ll ask you for a copy so I can relay it to my extensive private email distribution list.

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 21 2009 10:01 utc | 65

Has anyone noticed that the incredible Michael Heart song has been censored/banned by YouTube? Or am I missing something?

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 22 2009 19:38 utc | 66

The embedded version above still works for me Parviz, but youtube now say:

This video or group may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as flagged by YouTube’s user community.
To view this video or group, please verify you are 18 or older by signing in or signing up.

The reason for that censoring are obvious: ADL, YouTube launch partnership to fight video abuse

The Anti-Defamation League announced Sunday its recent expansion into the world of YouTube, the on-line video-sharing site.
The US-based advocacy group has officially partnered with the digital media powerhouse in an effort to combat hate speech and other forms of abuse.
As the largest Web-video hub, YouTube relies primarily on its users to hunt down and delete inappropriate content, or to ban abusive members. While the extent of the ADL’s role in that process is not yet known, the organization has already made a place for itself in YouTube’s new “Abuse and Safety Center,” where users are given advice directly from the ADL on how to confront hate speech.

ADL is part of “The Lobby”

Posted by: b | Jan 22 2009 19:55 utc | 67

b, even when I play the embedded version above I receive a message across the video screen: “We’re sorry, this video is no longer available”.
I also couldn’t register on YouTube, which probably means Iran is banned from this service (as with Sun Microsystems and other U.S.-based software firms).
But thanks anyway.

Posted by: Parviz | Jan 23 2009 6:18 utc | 68

parviz,
the video is still available for me.
No mentioning either of the content as B received. Just clicked play, and play it did.
oh those darn censors, regardless where there are.

Posted by: sabine | Jan 23 2009 6:41 utc | 69

many thanks mr. Michael Heart

Posted by: zakaria | Jan 23 2009 16:27 utc | 70

Parviz:
I can still find several copies of this song on YouTube. The opening line of the song, referring to the “blinding flash of white light,” brings me back to these stories of civilians burned to the bone by white phosphorus.
At Michael Heart’s website, you can watch the video or download the MP3, and Michael asks those who download the music to make a donation to UNRWA.
Thank you for all of your insights at MOA recently. Travel well; I’ll look forward to your comments when you return. Thanks also to Sabine for the translation of “the bad, bad neighbor.”

Posted by: catlady | Jan 23 2009 17:10 utc | 71

Here’s a very recent Channel 4 (UK) piece on Gaza I found on Pat Lang’s site – wrenching.
Sabine: Jai Ma!

Posted by: Tantalus | Jan 23 2009 18:53 utc | 72

cé fouitru israelien doiven tous allé se faire foutre

Posted by: mia | Jan 23 2009 20:19 utc | 73

the more video and photographic evidence comes to light, the more i loose faith in human kind. in the year 2009 human kind is as ruthless as in the 1600.
Tantalus: Jai Ma!

Posted by: Anonymous | Jan 23 2009 21:11 utc | 74

the thing that strikes me the most about the film linked by Tantalus is the attitude of the people. there has been killing on a massive scale and almost total destruction everywhere you can see. yet the people there are picking up what is still whole, sorting out whole bricks from the rubble and getting ready to rebuild. those who have so little in material possessions seem to have a very strong spirit and do not appeared to be bowed by the Israeli shock and awe.
also, why was the writing on the walls in English? was that for LittleGreenFootball consumption or is it simply because the troops there are mostly from Brooklyn?
I also keep reading about the shooting of girls and children. this certainly has to be a new low in modern warfare. who can possibly condone such action? it would seem that even the most depraved would stop at that. there is something very wrong with a society when that kind of behavior is tolerated.

Posted by: dan of steele | Jan 23 2009 21:17 utc | 75

74 was me.
dos: they have nowhere to go, and expect no one to replace the lost goods. I have often looked at my Grandmother, and tried to imagen her or any other female in Europe as a 25-26 year old “Truemmerfrau” after the war.
How do people survive? How do they live with their sorrow, their grief and their hatred, how to control the angst of tomorrow.
They do, because they must. I see no other way.
shooting girls and women = shooting of future terrorist incubators
50% of humanity are women, the other 50% were born by these women.
You don’t need many men to keep a race/specimen alive, but you do need a lot of females to carry the new generation to term. Gendercide. Also i would assume that in the world of the middle east a lot of the mens honour depends on how well they can defend the womenfolk.
As for the english on the wall, Israel is made up of migrants, do they all speak hebrew? or is english the language that facilitates communication until all new Israeli have good notion of hebrew? which raises the questions does the IDF communicates in english or hebrew?
the killing of the children, the fotos, i wish i had never looked at any of them, sometimes ignorance is bliss.

Posted by: sabine | Jan 23 2009 21:39 utc | 76

I thought of the Germans and the second great war while I was writing the post above but decided not to make that comparison as it seemed out of place. I do remember reading about a US bomber pilot remarking that on his way to bomb other targets in Germany, he saw Germans repairing their houses, the same houses he had bombed the day before. It was a spirit that inspired a kind of admiration in the pilot for the sheer doggedness of the Deutsche Volk.
hopefully some of the resident experts on things Israel will chime in on what the official language is there. I certainly would have guessed it was Hebrew and that is why I did not understand why the writing was in English, there was a similar episode during the attack on Lebanon where Israeli school girls were writing messages on tank shells that were to be fired off and that was in English too. The fact that those images made it into English speaking media is probably due to the fact we would have no clue of Hebrew or Arabic phrases which are probably a hundred times worse.

Posted by: dan of steele | Jan 23 2009 22:03 utc | 77

dos: Truemmerfrauen is the word for these people that i know, but the same was done in all european countries. in fact, as a teenager looking at war fotos i was always amazed as to how little the difference was between the french, english or german ladies.
i am sure the english had a word for their ladies, as did the french or the italian etc. what amazed me was that it was the women mainly working in the debris, cleaning the bricks, stocking them etc.
as for females in war, i doubt anyone ever asked a woman about her thoughts before starting one.

Posted by: sabine | Jan 23 2009 22:15 utc | 78

I had to look up Truemmerfrauen, did not know it. means something like women of the rubble or ruins.
somewhat off topic but I visited Berlin a couple years back and saw the Russian war museum where they have many photos of that city at the end of the great war. It looked a lot worse than Gaza does now. you would never guess by looking at it today though.

Posted by: dan of steele | Jan 23 2009 22:22 utc | 79

my parents house in the 70’s had one side still missing – all that was left was a big hole in the ground, you could see the old wallpaper, tiling and such. The house was amongst the last one to be knocked down in the early 80s and is now replaced with a new building.
It took me the longest time to understand that the house was bombed. (looking a some of the fotos my mum still has), you can go into any german city and see where the bombs fell, the architecture stands out. But the same is true for any other place that got bombed, be it in europe or elsewhere.
to the point where we still call the bomb experts when we have diggings going on in some part of my town.
http://www6.dw-world.de/en/2110.php – has an write up on the 60 year ending of wwII and the history of rubble-women.

Posted by: sabine | Jan 23 2009 22:41 utc | 80

which raises the questions does the IDF communicates in english or hebrew?
when i was traveling in nepal about 15 years ago i met some young guys from israel, all around 22 who had just finished their stint w/the idf, one of them spoke broken english, the rest not a word. i would imagine they speak hebrew in the idf.

Posted by: annie | Jan 24 2009 19:14 utc | 81