Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 27, 2008
The Tracks Lead To Goldman

Two weeks ago, the nation’s most powerful regulators and bankers huddled in the Lower Manhattan fortress that is the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, desperately trying to stave off disaster.

As the group, led by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., pondered the collapse of one of America’s oldest investment banks, Lehman Brothers, a more dangerous threat emerged: American International Group, the world’s largest insurer, was teetering. A.I.G. needed billions of dollars to right itself and had suddenly begged for help.

The only Wall Street chief executive participating in the meeting was Lloyd C. Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, Mr. Paulson’s former firm. Mr. Blankfein had particular reason for concern.

Although it was not widely known, Goldman, a Wall Street stalwart that had seemed immune to its rivals’ woes, was A.I.G.’s largest trading partner, according to six people close to the insurer who requested anonymity because of confidentiality agreements. A collapse of the insurer threatened to leave a hole of as much as $20 billion in Goldman’s side, several of these people said.

Days later, federal officials, who had let Lehman die and initially balked at tossing a lifeline to A.I.G., ended up bailing out the insurer for $85 billion.
Behind Insurer’s Crisis, a Blind Eye to a Web of Risk

It seems that Paulson invested $85 billion of taxpayer money into AIG to save Goldman from a $20 billion loss, or $200 billion – who knows? Still Paulson acted to save Goldman, not AIG. With what reasoning?

Why would anyone trust this criminal who asked Congress for unreviewable power to spend a Trillion, or two, to run the U.S. Treasury?

Comments

‘When EF Hutton Max Keiser Talks, You Listen
MOA’s would be wise to watch this all the way through, especially what is conveyed about half way in…
Bonus:
Remember 1983?
my vitriol cup runneth over…I stand in awe of such a Rovian moves without Rove?
Bravo! Master stroke!
WHACK!
Thank-you mam’, may I have another?
HAHAHAHA… It’s not the laughter and simultaneous cathartic tears that bothers me, it’s my inability to stop…HAHAHAHAHAHA….UH, HAHAHAHAHA…
I was always astonished at the extraordinary good nature and lack of malice with which men who had been flogged spoke of their beatings and of those who had inflicted them…“~Dostoevsky (Memoirs From the House of the Dead)

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 27 2008 19:15 utc | 1

I’ve always thought from the get-go that Paulson’s plan stinks to high heaven because it’s shaped so that taxpayers bear all the downside losses but get none of the upside gains…
Now I smell the distinct odor of a rat in his plan simply because conflict of interest is written all over it!

Posted by: Cynthia | Sep 27 2008 20:30 utc | 2

More generally, the concept of “too big to fail” needs to be seriously thought through, and this not especially for the current crisis but in anticipation of the next! (Note: I’m assuming that the ‘business cycle’ is not going to be abolished any time soon, even though on a regular basis business begins to believe that this is actually possible and that they have discovered some magical model that is exempt from it!) After all what exactly does it say that companies that currently are so close to fitting the description of “too big to fail” are being swallowed up by other companies.
OK, so Bear Stearns was so big (and its tentacles were so deeply intertwined with so many other parts of the financial system) that when it began to fail the U.S. government stepped in and facilitated its purchase by JP Morgan Chase rather than allowing it to fail. Bear Stearns was deemed “too big to fail”… Subsequently JP Morgan Chase also acquired WaMu when it failed. Surely, by definition, JP Morgan Chase is now also “too big to fail”!!
It seems that the government’s response to saving the companies “too big to fail” is to facilitate the creation of even bigger companies that presumably then also become “too big to fail.” Is this really a good idea? Taken to its (very exaggerated) logical conclusion and looking a few decades ahead, after the next few bubbles there will be one BIG financial company, and one single point of failure! Then what that one fails, it’s ‘adios muchachos’!
Tosk
Redefining too big to fail

Posted by: Tosk | Sep 27 2008 22:23 utc | 3

here is an interesting comment from someone over @ shiachat.com in response to a rense piece titled ‘Taxpayers Forced To
Bailout Zionist Gangsters’
Mr Bernanke said such measures would condemn the scheme to failure: “We cannot impose punitive measures on the institutions that chose to sell assets. That would eliminate or strongly reduce participation.”
Funny that the Americans are being given the same choice they gave the Iraqis.
The Iraqis were told, put the thief Iyad Allawi in power or we wreck your country. The Americans are being told, pay the ransom of US$700billion or the economy gets wrecked.

Posted by: annie | Sep 27 2008 22:31 utc | 4

after the next few bubbles there will be one BIG financial company, and one single point of failure! Then what that one fails, it’s ‘adios muchachos’!
something tells me they won’t be saying goodbye to us. ever.

Posted by: annie | Sep 27 2008 22:36 utc | 5

Have no fear. Everything is going according to plan. Awhile back Roubini posted a list of the current CEOs and top executives of some of the big Wall Street firms. One name kept popping up constantly. Goldman Sachs. Their alumni are everywhere. Welcome to the Corporate States of Amerika.

Posted by: mikefromtexas | Sep 28 2008 2:50 utc | 6

Good post. While it hasn’t been mentioned much, Paulson still owns a large chunk of Goldman Sachs stock. If I’m not mistaken, something like $600 million worth. It might be in a “blind” trust, for the moment, but it’s still his, and he’ll get it back when he leaves office. So if his actions cause their stock to increase he stands to make an enormous fortune off of it, possibly billions. The extent of the obvious corruption here is just off the scale.

Posted by: mike | Sep 28 2008 3:27 utc | 7

I remember a book I read in high school, this surgeon, who is a dodgey fellow is cutting on this patient and he happens to cut the the wrong thing and massive bleeding begins. So, he throws in some tampons and sews him up and gets him out the operating theater and he dies 30 minutes later.
I figure that is what this bailout is really about — to fend off a crisis for at three months so that it won’t be the dodgey surgeon’s “fault”.
IF, which many economists seem to think, there is no meltdown but “just” a real bad recession and people lose their jobs, homes and cars — well, that will be, sigh, the new administration’s fault, but the Heroic Vision of Paulson and the Repugnants saved the country from total collapse. Sorry, folks, but that’s what you get for electing a bunch of Dumrats and an off-color prez!!!

Posted by: Chuck Cliff | Sep 28 2008 5:02 utc | 8

In The Shameless Buffett Deal I write of Buffett taking a $5 Billion stake in Goldman because he is sure the bailout is coming.
Now in this WaPo piece: Congressional Leaders Announce Breakthrough in Bailout Bill Negotiations we find this:

Yesterday’s negotiations, which began shortly after 3 p.m., were at times tense and confusing, according to participants. At one point, a senator sought advice from investor Warren Buffett, one of the world’s richest men, according to Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.).

Posted by: b | Sep 28 2008 5:34 utc | 9

Off the books transactions at the treasury department will soon be available for any activity Cheyneyco would like to pursue, a nice shot in the arm for the white powder trade and black budget. The republicans pushing for an insurance plan makes me wonder if that’s where the wrinkle in the records could be put. Perhaps this is another aspect of Our New Deal For World Order. 610 billion went to the pentagon while we were busy talking bailout, Them Dems Are On The Take.
So, we hand out 700 billions, for sh**. Hurried by a congressional reccess, an enormous effort has gotten us the we buy sh** business, me and some of you all owners. Feel proud!
Liked Obama except for the realization that the Dems will be building us new nuke plants. Overall it was a buzz to see the turn-back-from-the-precipice choice sound lucid as hell, even with a pretty perfect liar for the Night Is Day party.

Posted by: aumana | Sep 28 2008 6:37 utc | 10

via Big Picture US News: From Enron to the Financial Crisis, With Alan Greenspan in Between

According to the Bank for International Settlements, the global derivatives market is now worth some $676.5 trillion. That’s $676,500,000,000,000. That’s a fivefold increase over the value of derivatives that were traded in 2003. Further, that $676.5 trillion is 51 times America’s current gross domestic product.

Ooops …

Posted by: b | Sep 28 2008 7:39 utc | 11

Goldman Sachs…sure, clear a while ago…and yes he Paulson owns a lot of stock (not sure how much and under what form.)
As only a ‘few’ of these banks can survive, what we are assisting at with popcorn or stuffed olives is a cut-throat fight between them to determine who exactly will get the control of the left-overs, which, with bail outs and ‘new regs’ to look clean and ‘consolidation’ from the tax payer, and then BAU (business as usual), will nevertheless be quite considerable. A mighty prize.
Ostensibly, that is their hope. Their fear, and I have never seen such fear – Palin with her gaffes are light relief – is that the system does indeed collapse, and then them with it.

Posted by: Tangerine | Sep 28 2008 14:49 utc | 12

Re: Chuck Cliff
“off-color prez” ??????
That’s disgusting. Cut it out.

Posted by: Fighting Bob | Sep 28 2008 16:31 utc | 13

@ Fighting Bob, I don’t think you understood 😉
That is what the the Repugnants will say (in fact they have been already practicing saying in dog-whistle code.
As a matter fact, they have already started practicing blaming the Great Collapse on blacks and hispanics (dog whistle: lazy, shiftless swarthy) so, now the hard-working, discriminated against regular (white) citizens are getting screwed.

Posted by: Chuck Cliff | Sep 28 2008 17:45 utc | 14

@ Chuck Cliff
My apologies.
Ah, what a mess we face
as the swindlers head for the hills.

Posted by: Fighting Bob | Sep 29 2008 2:02 utc | 15