Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 7, 2008
Tha Largest Bailout Ever

Today the Secretary of the Treasury announced how the bailout of the insolvent Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae is planed to take place. These are the priorities:

Since this difficult period for the GSEs began, I have clearly stated three critical objectives: providing stability to financial markets, supporting the availability of mortgage finance, and protecting taxpayers

Did you notice the sequence of those three objectives?

I attribute the need for today’s action primarily to the inherent conflict and flawed business model embedded in the GSE structure, and to the ongoing housing correction. GSE managements and their Boards are responsible for neither.

WTF – in 2006 the agencies, who are supposed to finance sound mortgages and have done so for some 70 years, started to buy ALT-A loans where the borrower provided no income documentation. The also began to hedge risk through derivatives. This under the eyes of their regulator, the Treasury and Congress. It was certainly not the "business model embedded in the GSE structure" but the greed of the management and the shareholders and the willful blindness of the watchdogs, that drove F&F over the cliff.

Paulson’s provides a four step plan. As general strategy F&F will still slowly increase their MBS holdings into 2009 and are supposed to shrink it in and after 2010.

The immediate financial measures are threefold:

First, Treasury and FHFA have established Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements, contractual agreements between the Treasury and the conserved entities. Under these agreements, Treasury will ensure that each company maintains a positive net worth.

The taxpayer will buy fresh stocks from these companies and provide them with enough capital to prevent their formal bankruptcy. If they make more losses, the taxpayer will buy more stocks and delute the value of stocks it bought before. The current preferred stockholders will have to take some of the now occurring losses. This will kill off many smaller banks who have their capital invested in such shares.

The second step Treasury is taking today is the establishment of a new secured lending credit facility which will be available to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks.

The U.S. taxpayer will borrow money from China and lend it to F&F because China is no longer willing to lend to them directly.

Finally, to further support the availability of mortgage financing for millions of Americans, Treasury is initiating a temporary program to purchase GSE MBS.

This is the PIMCO provision. PIMCO, the huge bond fund that provides fixed income for many U.S. citizens, has bought quite a lot of F&F (GSE) Mortgage Backed Securities (i.e. toxic waste) it now wants to sell. The chief of PIMCO, Bill Gross, made a lot of noise over this last week as he was afraid to lose money on them. Now the U.S. taxpayer will buy these MBS.

Through the four actions we have taken today, FHFA and Treasury have acted on the responsibilities we have to protect the stability of the financial markets, including the mortgage market, and to protect the taxpayer to the maximum extent possible.

Again, notice the sequence.

The Treasury action came this weekend because Russia and China were recently dumping huge amounts of F&F MBS. They fear that the implicit government guarantee for these bonds would not hold up. Paulson today still did not give an explicit government guarantee but pushed that task to Congress.

There is not much in Paulson’s acts that will give China and Russia a more secure feeling about their F&F MBS holdings. I therefore expect them to continue their sell off of these papers. That means that the trouble over these agencies is far from over.

Comments

it seems that evey time capital is in such straits as these it seek a generalised war – i’d love to be a fly on the wall of meetings at the central commitee of the chinese communist party

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 7 2008 17:24 utc | 1

How much more can the beleaguered Working Class of America, the class that pays the bulk of these taxes, withstand before it completely disintegrates from one acrid policy after another? And, when that happens, who will pay the bill then? At that point, I guess there will be no choice left but to blow the whole planet up rather than admit self defeat. Ironically, the beleagured Working Class continues to support its own demise. It’s insanity.

Posted by: Serf | Sep 7 2008 19:14 utc | 2

“The company had made decisions that, while not necessarily in violation of accounting rules …”
— Gretchen Morgenstern, NYT, 6 Sep 2008
“… the war situation has developed not necessarily to Japan’s advantage …”
— Hirohito, Emperor of Japan, 15 Aug 1945

Posted by: Roger Bigod | Sep 7 2008 19:29 utc | 3

why do I have a feeling that my vacation fund will be much depleted tomorrow 🙁

Posted by: Rabia | Sep 7 2008 20:38 utc | 4

“How much more can the beleaguered Working Class of America, the class that pays the bulk of these taxes, withstand …”
Oh, I got a feeling a coward and cowed populace can take much much more…
As I said before, ‘I don’t know what scares me more, the madness that smashes people down, or their/our ability to endure it.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 7 2008 21:54 utc | 5

inner city press: Subcrime Questions As Freddie Mac Handed to Moffett of Carlyle and US Bancorp

NEW YORK, September 7 — U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson’s announcement today that he is unilaterally appointing Carlyle Group advisor David Moffett to replace Richard Syron as chief executive of Freddie Mac is more than a little ironic, and troubling. The Carlyle Group invested in and lost on subprime mortgage, it admitted earlier this year. In fact, Carlyle invested in bonds issued by Freddie Mac, as well as Fannie Mae.
In March 2008, the Carlyle Group’s mortgage-bond fund, having received more than $400 million in margin calls since earlier in the month, said it couldn’t reach an agreement with it lenders, who would “promptly” take over all of its remaining assets. Through March 12, the company had defaulted on over $16.6 billion of debt. On the news, the dollar fell to the weakest since 1995 against the yen and a record low versus the Euro. How then, sources are asking Inner City Press, can Moffett be put in charge of Freddie Mac?
In fact, Carlyle beyond its investments in military contractors has been accused of other slash and burn tactics, for example by workers at the nursing home chain Manor Care. Its buy-out of Home Depot’s contractor supply unit nearly fell apart, as its lenders balked.
Moffett previously served as chief financial officer of U.S. Bancorp, which beyond its own subprime lending was a 25% investor in the now-bankrupt subprime lender New Century. When Inner City Press investigated U.S. Bancorp’s stake in New Century, the company argued to the Federal Reserve that despite having two seats on the board of directors it did not control the lender. The word subcrime began to become applicable. The Fed demurred, and eventually the stake was sold off. But Moffett’s companies’ involvement in the subprime field is hardly a basis for confidence in him to lead at Freddie Mac. In fact, the choice calls into question Paulson’s judgment. To be continued.

Posted by: b real | Sep 8 2008 0:07 utc | 6

$cam, that’s not what I implied. I meant “withstand” as in how much more blood can be sucked before there’s no more blood? When there’s no more blood to suck, then There Will Be Blood.
Of course, you are correct. Americans are not only stupid, they’re soft and could never foment a revolution, bloodless, or otherwise.

Posted by: Serf | Sep 8 2008 0:20 utc | 7

jeeeez-nice plan. now all they have to do is take greenspan’s advice from today and nationalize the rest. somehow this just doesn’t sound or feel like the original bush plan, if he really meant what he said way back when about government getting out of the whole shebang. guess they really didn’t mean it. well, the last time this sort of shit went down, the upshot was a world at war.
is everybody ready to strap on?

Posted by: stumblewire | Sep 8 2008 2:21 utc | 8

Wow, what a bailout. Wonder how the market will react to this in the long run.

Posted by: Aaron | Sep 8 2008 3:58 utc | 9

It sure looks like the folks from the financial world have been inhaling way too many libertarian paint fumes, causing them to become intoxicated with irrational exuberance.

Posted by: Cynthia | Sep 8 2008 14:56 utc | 10

The old adage that it’s better to laugh than to cry is captured succinctly in this clip…
http://econvideo.blogspot.com/2008/08/take-load-off-fannie.html
And I would have never guessed that the members of “The Band” — the ones who first composed and performed not only this song “The Weight” but especially the song “The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down” — are all Canadians, except for one. Their music sounds too southern, in my view, for them to be from The Great White North…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Band

Posted by: Cynthia | Sep 8 2008 15:05 utc | 11

@Aaron-@9 – Wow, what a bailout. Wonder how the market will react to this in the long run.
A few days of rally as the international 2-3% jump today. Those will tapper off and stocks will go for a new low (DOW < 10,000). China and Russia will continue to sell GSE debt. The dollar will stop its current rally and also make new lows. Interest rates will go up. Shorter: Nothing really changed with the move and after a while the world will notice that.

Posted by: b | Sep 8 2008 15:25 utc | 12

**Of course, you are correct. Americans are not only stupid, they’re soft and could never foment a revolution, bloodless, or otherwise.
Posted by: Serf | Sep 7, 2008 8:20:05 PM | 7 **
this are experts with a proven track record.[tinyurl.com/364ea4]
they are so good at doing charities all over the world, how about doing something for their countrymen for a change ?

Posted by: denk | Sep 9 2008 6:17 utc | 13

Interesting thread. I can’t help wondering if we are not witnessing the analogue of Suez-1956: in this case the U.S. leadership may be about to discover that it no longer has the economic power to call the shots in international politics. If the relatively minor adjustment in China and Russia’s investment policies vis a vis dollar denominated securities suffices to produce nationalization of Fannie and Freddie, i.e., a complete repudiation of standard Republican boilerplate, what would a more drastic adjustment of their interventions in the U.S. Treasury bond market do to the U.S. economy? Admittedly, the new protagonists have good reason to avoid dramatic moves that could hurt their own interests, but it’s hard not to see a very clear shot across the bow of the U.S. ship of state delivered by what had heretofore been very junior partners in the global ruling class. The new “msters of the universe” have their major centers of power in such locales as Shanghai, Tokyo, Moscow, the Persian Gulf and New Dehli rather than New York, London, and Paris. Are Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac retribution for the neo-con follies in Georgia?
Caveat: I have no competence in the economic and financial nitty gritty underlying such matters, so my conjectures may be completely erroneous.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Sep 9 2008 10:50 utc | 14