Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 17, 2008
Black Wednesday?

The Fed seems to run out of cash as the Treasury is selling $40 billion in fresh bonds to provide more money to the Fed. Who will buy those bonds at what rate?

The TED spread difference between Treasury rates and interbank rates is at a record high. The higher the spread, the greater the perceived credit risks in interbank lending. No one wants to lend anymore.

A money market fund yesterday ‘broke the buck’ and halted redemptions. Safe money market funds ain’t safe no more.

Tip: Don’t lend (deposit) anything to (at) any bank above what is insured ($100,000 in the U.S.).

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission  forbids naked short selling of financial stocks. Russia closed the stock exchange. Free markets abound …

The Fed is trying to find a buyer for Washington Mutual – the biggest Saving and Loans in the U.S.  It might have as much luck with that as with finding a buyer for AIG.

After Morgan Stanley yesterday announced ‘better than expected’ earnings, the stock fell 23% 37% 43%. Seems like no one trusts these earnings numbers these days. Why might that be?

Goldman Sachs is down 23%, Gold without the man and sachs is up $50 $80 an ounce.

Everything is, of course,  contained.

More in the comments …

Comments

Now we learn why the Fed needs cash: Fed Repaid JPMorgan $87 Billion for Lehman Financing

The New York Federal Reserve intervened aggressively to shore up the U.S. financial system this week, providing at least $87 billion to help underpin trades with bankrupt Lehman Brothers, court documents show.

While the government had pledged not to fund a rescue of Lehman, the disclosure Tuesday showed authorities that were taking other financial steps to prevent markets from descending into chaos.
JPMorgan Chase advanced $87 billion to Lehman on Monday to help clear and facilitate securities transactions with customers and clients of Lehman “to avoid disruption of financial markets,” according to documents filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

“This expansion of the Fed’s credit program is unprecedented,” said David Pauker, a managing director with restructuring adviser Goldin Associates.
“It should provide the liquidity necessary to facilitate the sale of Lehman’s core brokerage and banking business.” That sale appeared closer Tuesday, as a source said Britain’s Barclays had agreed to buy Lehman’s core broker-dealer business for about $2 billion.

So the Fed provided $87 billion to facilitate the sale of Lehman’s core business for $2 billion????

On Sunday, the Federal Reserve said it would accept a wider range of collateral, including equities, from investment banks seeking central bank loans in an effort to help keep markets functioning.
The central bank also pumped $50 billion into the financial system earlier on Tuesday in addition to the $70 billion it added on Monday.

This is total irresponsible behavior by the Fed. Lehman is bankrupt. Why lend $87 billion to someone who is bankrupt?

Posted by: b | Sep 17 2008 16:32 utc | 1

“It’s looking like a negative development. I don’t see why the banking sector needs to be under the purview of the public sector,” said Alberto Ramos, a senior economist with Goldman Sachs, “The private sector does a much more efficient job of running that type of business.” – on chavez’s nationalisation of banco de venezuela

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 17 2008 16:54 utc | 2

Roubini thinks the Fed screwed up the AIG nationalization:

The reality is that it would have been more honest and clean and proper to take AIG to bankruptcy court and then provide the government support (the $85 billion loan) in the form of a formal debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing. Why was this solution not taken? It is not clear. Going to court may imply a credit event that triggers formal default and consequences for creditors and CDS holders and the guarantees made by AG on toxic fixed income securities. But what has happened is effectively a credit event and such triggers should be occurring regardless of whether AIG goes into formal bankruptcy court or not. The Fed and Treasury should immediately clarify on whether their intervention includes or not a formal stay on all the creditors of AIG including the holders of the short term claims against AIG.
Any fuzziness and lack of transparency on this matter would be severely destabilizing for markets and investors. To truly safeguard the government claims such a stay should be imposed; and [if] it is not imposed the government action will allow short term creditors of AIG to run scot free with two consequences: the government claims will be at risk putting taxpayers’ money at risk; and the claims of longer term creditors of AIG will be whacked more down the line as short term creditors were allowed to be bailed out.

And by nationalizing AIG the government that two days ago drew a line in the sand on no more bailout with its decision to let Lehman to go bust has now opened again the floodgates of moral hazard and of private firms’ demands to be bailed out. Already Ford and GM are requesting loans guarantees and Congress is considering them. Next will be airlines and lots of other non-financial corporate who expect now the government to bail them out. The argument of the supplicants will be: “If we are bailing out Wall Street firms such as Bear, Fannie and Freddie, AIG and soon enough banks why shouldn’t we bail out Main Street firm such as Ford and GM that are also systemic ally important? After all Bear was employing only 20 thousands or so folks while Ford and GM have hundreds of thousands of employees.”
So soon enough the transformation the USA into the USSRA (United Socialist State Republic of America) will be complete: we have defeated the USSRR to create a communist economy in the most advanced free market economy in the world. And calling it socialism (even socialism for the rich, the well connected and Wall Street) is giving a bad name even to a failed experiment like socialism; this is more akin to the creation of a corporatist state (like the Italian fascism or the Germany Third Reich) where private sector interest are protected (gains privatized and losses socialized) where the government is taken over by corrupt and reckless private interests.
The paradox is that this this whole mess was creaete by a bunch of zealot fanatics who believed in the laissez faire ideology of free markets unbound by propers rules, regulation and supervision.

Posted by: b | Sep 17 2008 17:01 utc | 3

Cravenly, I was waiting for someone else to bring up corporatism – I’m no economist and my grasp of political theory is primitive, but that is apparently what’s being created here. Mussolini must be applauding in his crypt.
Welcome to the United States of Salò.

Posted by: Tantalus | Sep 17 2008 17:25 utc | 4

tantalus
all the elements of salò – the defeat, the dumbness & the depravity

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 17 2008 17:32 utc | 5

Federal bank insurance fund dwindling

Banks are not the only ones struggling in the growing financial crisis. The fund established to insure their deposits is also feeling the pinch, and the taxpayer may be the lender of last resort.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., whose insurance fund has slipped below the minimum target level set by Congress, could be forced to tap tax dollars through a Treasury Department loan if Washington Mutual Inc., the nation’s largest thrift, or another struggling rival fails, economists and industry analysts said Tuesday.

Posted by: b | Sep 17 2008 18:08 utc | 6

Many long-time government officials are just shaking their heads in disbelief this week at what Paulson and his crew are doing. It truly does seem unbelievable that this tiny band of people are making these decisions and commitments of our national treasure with virtually no oversight or accountability, no longer-term plan (apparently), no analysis or policy discussion of the options. I have worked in the public sector for a long time and can not recall decisions of this magnitude being made with so little high-level vetting, discussion, debate, argument.
The news about the special bond sale is scary. I wonder what rate they (we taxpayers, that is) will have to pay.

Posted by: Maxcrat | Sep 17 2008 18:11 utc | 7

Then, Wall Street just needs to hire the Italian defense minister, the guy who said that the fascists soldiers of Salo were decent people defending their country and their opinions.

Posted by: CluelessJoe | Sep 17 2008 18:17 utc | 8

maxcrat
it is so simlar to the end of apartheid where the greed of generations who had looted & barbarised the country did not care one ounce for the generations that followed . it is clear now, that the empire is finished – but the people left paying the bill will be the children & the children of those children
in watching this & all the mechanisms we see the elite’s hatred of the people unmasked. in katrina it was bloated black bodies that did not offend the american psyche – now literally generation after generation of americans will be floating on the filth that paulson & wall street are constructing
the ruling class defending itself so seamlessly is a revolting spectacle

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 17 2008 18:24 utc | 9

Quite frankly, Corporatism was birthed when Corporations were granted the unalienable rights of personhood under the fourteenth amendment as the following indicates:

Another way personhood amplifies corporate power is cruelly ironic in a way that underlines the amoral nature of the marketplace. The court argument that corporations used to gain personhood was that corporations constituted persons under the Fourteenth Amendment—the 1868 measure whose aim was to ensure full personhood to the freed slaves. If this sounds preposterous to you, you’re hardly alone; researchers have been scouring archives in an effort to make sense of it but so far have no conclusive explanation.
While corporate lawyers went about consolidating the power that their clients gained from personhood, Jim Crow laws inflicted many more decades of oppression on African Americans before the civil rights movement finally ended government-sanctioned segregation and ensured their voting rights. As “persons,” corporations not infrequently sue to claim that decisions by democratically elected governments violate their rights under laws meant to protect people of color from injustice. This gains them the status of an oppressed person, despite their wealth and power, and thus strengthens their position in court. (See article, page 30.)
Although corporate use of the Fourteenth Amendment is little known, it is hardly a new phenomenon. Justice Hugo Black observed in 1938, “The history of the amendment proves that the people were told that its purpose was to protect weak and helpless human beings and were not told that it was intended to remove corporations in any fashion from the control of state governments.” He also wrote, “Of the cases in this court in which the Fourteenth Amendment was applied during its first fifty years after its adoption, less than one-half of one percent invoked it in protection of the Negro race, and more than fifty percent asked that its benefits be extended to corporations.”

How Corporations Became ‘Persons’

Death to the Corporation has to be our first step in creating a new, and better world. Instead of being Little Eichmans, we need to collectively take control of the corporations and lobby Congress to Amend the Constitution to make it illegal for a Corporation to have the rights of a person. I’m trying, Juan. It’s a start. We can initially use their own devices against them, and then use the leverage of those devices to facilitate an Amendment, or two that makes any future use of those devices illegal and unconstitutional.

Posted by: Non-Hodgkins | Sep 17 2008 18:39 utc | 10

Good stuff, b. Realitognostics is always more usefully informative than prognostics.
Government cannot in and of itself correct itself. For Government to claim Change You Can Believe In to the public mobbing out in the street, while behind the bank, the double doors are off the hinge so the vault can be spirited away en masse, is farce.
Oh, we’ll get “change”, alright. As in, buddy, can you spare a dime? Anyone? Anyone?
Ironically, having foreseen this for 8 years, all we’ve been able to do is “present posterior” as a perfect victim, with CD’s, money market and non-performing precious.
Reread your Keating 5 history on what happened with that private debt was socialized.

Posted by: Keith Five | Sep 17 2008 19:24 utc | 11

One biblical law an atheist would like to see enforced: no usury. “Impossible”? Indeed, without usury ’twere impossible to ruin the earth so quickly.

Posted by: Cloud | Sep 17 2008 19:41 utc | 12

Already Ford and GM are requesting loans guarantees and Congress is considering them. Next will be airlines and lots of other non-financial corporate who expect now the government to bail them out. The argument of the supplicants will be: “If we are bailing out Wall Street firms such as Bear, Fannie and Freddie, AIG and soon enough banks why shouldn’t we bail out Main Street firm such as Ford and GM that are also systemic ally important? After all Bear was employing only 20 thousands or so folks while Ford and GM have hundreds of thousands of employees.”
indeed, the question is simply: when does the fed run out of money? that’s the point i want to know. it’s like an umbrella: right now, dozens of corporate “people” are trying get in from out of the rain. but only so many will fit under the one umbrella of “full faith and credit,” and be extended immediately applicable cash to creditors (and golden parachute clauses) in a way that can be significant to a market reality over the next 6-18mos. so…after the fed can’t sell anymore bonds (because does anyone really think that there are enough lenders/buyers to extent of having liquid capital for the full value of debt of every entity that is exposed by this crisis?) what happens then? the chinese, saudis, and other “institutional grade” currency giants don’t, in fact, have endlessly deep pockets. short version: currency “value” is an illusion, and when the panic’s on, that illusion demonstrates the full extent of its fungibility.

Posted by: chicago dyke | Sep 17 2008 19:51 utc | 13

If I were ever to attempt a genetic analysis of this scene–an analysis that could easily collapse into an infinite regression (“and so for a nail the kingdom was lost”)–I would go no further than the firing of Paul O’Neill.
Right then and there, we learned that discipline meant nothing any more. Or more precisely: we learned that discipline was a recipe for disaster, and that the collapse of discipline was the one sure way to prosperity.
The funny thing about a collapse is that it can take a while, even as you watch it happening with your very own eyes. Thus di Caprio and his chick in Titanic, swearing eternal love as they float around in sub-sub-zero water for a good five or ten minutes.

Posted by: alabama | Sep 17 2008 20:13 utc | 14

The financial sector was the only one after housing in the Bush era that was providing the “vig” to the made men of the American economy. Now both have collapsed. The Federal government is broke. 900 billion dollars was just added to the federal debt. There is only two options an orderly bankruptcy or shock therapy. The zealot fanatics who brought us Iraq and Shock Therapy are still in charge and neck and neck in the presidential race. We all are Houstonians now; soon to be without basic services, water and electricity.

Posted by: VietnamVet | Sep 17 2008 20:34 utc | 15

If the 900 billion figure is correct, then we are hitting similar costs to those of the Iraq war so far.

Posted by: alex | Sep 17 2008 20:55 utc | 16

…which brings to mind Lawrence Lindsey, summarily fired for saying that the adventure in Iraq might cost as much as $200 billion…
Maybe the ownership has learned that their property isn’t well managed by people named “Bush”.

Posted by: alabama | Sep 17 2008 21:39 utc | 17

Rothbard wrote that the US was bankrupt a long time ago. He told us that the US could never pay off its debt and that only two ways out of the mess existed. One was to resort to inflation and just inflate the currency until the debt was very easy to pay. The second was to just repudiate the debt and start fresh.
He recommended debt repudiation (if I recall correctly) since that was a much more honest approach and would lead to a government that had to “pay as it went” since no one would lend to it for a long time.
Well folks, it is much worse now than when Rothbard was alive and I still see only two options for the USA. This week tells me that hyper-inflation does not scare the “masters of money” one bit.
Oh, boy. Say, would any German sponsor an old American couple as German citizens? My Irish/Scot ancestors roamed your woods a bit, the historians tell me. Any takers? I am house-broken!

Posted by: Buckaroo | Sep 17 2008 22:55 utc | 18

my illnesses preoccupy my time but i cannot believe we are witnessing the colossal collapse of capitalism – as we are – there is no doubt in my mind on that – yes it might drag itself through the swamp but it is finished. what remains important for me – is that it has had been condemned to unmask itself & its interests
it has had to unmask itself enough for the hatred of the people to be quite visible. what is also revealed or unmasked is the fact that these control infected elites in fact control nothing
on every level – domestic with cities completely ravaged in the empire either by neglect, flight of capital or mismanagement. new orleans for example is not exceptional in the landscape – there are a number of cities within the belly of the beast that have been ripped apart by human disaster, the ‘economy’ is nothing but a collection of card tricks, & the foreign policy possesses nothing except force & that too is failing
i do not revel in it but if ever an empire has deserved a comeuppance the u s empire is singularly worthy

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 17 2008 23:10 utc | 19

& i am amazed watching the empire’s lackeys try to sanitise this armageddon in their media even while you see the commentariat on the ‘economy’ quiver as they speak or reveal daily their absolute ignorance of what is actually happenning
faith was all they had & they don’t even have that

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 17 2008 23:14 utc | 20

A few links from me:
Mish wonders what law grants The Fed the power to lend to insurance companies….

“It’s a good question given that the Fed is widely thought to be authorized to lend only to banks. It turns out the Fed can lend to pizza parlors if it wants to, with a questionable interpretation of the Federal Reserve Act.”

The Big Picture has a pretty picture of financial losses by various companies…
Blog Maverick catches a buyback pattern at Merrill, Lehman, and AIG….

“3 Companies facing cash crunch oblivion. A bankruptcy, an desperation sale and pure desperation. What do all 3 companies have in common ? Share buybacks. Billions and Billions and Billions in share buybacks over the last 18 months.”

Lastly, I believe it bears repeating that since April 2008, The Fed has had its own staff in the offices of the very companies now getting Fed support…..

“The US Federal Reserve has sent staff into some of Wall Street’s biggest firms and its New York branch is gathering evidence on key traders’ activities as America’s central bank raises its scrutiny of risk to an unprecedented level.
Fed staff have set up shop in Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and Bear Stearns to monitor their financial condition just days after Henry Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, proposed that the Fed become the financial industry’s “risk czar”. “

best,
j

Posted by: Jeremiah | Sep 17 2008 23:41 utc | 21

Our broker back in the dot.con neutron bomb days used to joke, relaxed after a Wall Street lunch with $1000 bottles of wine and floozies in flagrant delecto, that he’d bought a house in the Hamptons for $6M cash, ‘to avoid transfer and property taxes’, somewhere outside the City he could park his Phantom, and his Bentley, and I always thought what a prodigious ass, thinking he can pimp me into following his dubious, “buy and hold your investment is liquid (in $1000 bottles) at all times,” but then I ran into someone online who actually knew the guy, or of him from close hand, and sure enough, they were “doing” $5000 lunches, and he did drive a Bentley, and when the Fund went tits up, and the SEC seized them for illegally junioring senior bonds at 30% then stepping them down to 10%, then they all started turning state’s evidence, sued for every last declared (hence the cash buys) asset, and ultimately murdering and suiciding each other….you have to wonder what the private side of this week’s market meltdown is gonna look like on the Hampton’s police blotter, or whether with the bailout, they all copped a pass?

Posted by: Coppa Pass | Sep 17 2008 23:58 utc | 22

rememberinggiap–
I am sorry for your personal news. I hope things will get better for you.
I welcome always the fresh incisiveness of your posts.
The financial news we are commenting on has been a long time coming, and long foreseen. In one sense it will get more chaotic, but that was foreseen too. The end of an iniquitous order of the world is deeply welcome, even as we know that vampires never give up their way of destruction–so that the end will be at least as hard as the times before–and that they will try to find a new cloak for themselves in which to insinuate themselves into the time that comes after.
Let us celebrate: Let fear be matched by joy. Times will get worse, terrifyingly worse, but our spirits will be heartened by the wrong that passes away.
–Gaianne

Posted by: Gaianne | Sep 18 2008 0:38 utc | 23

Just came in from running errands, and was listening to npr (national propagenda radio) in the car, and they were discussing the AIG thing, and it was ridiculously confusing as they were using language and ideals that had no context, nor did they explain anything well, but what was astounding to me was that I had forgotten I had left KPFA radio playing in the house, and after coming into the house, kpfa Flashpoints program was discussing the same, however, it was like night & day the reporting and asking of questions, and putting things into context. I got really angry, and am still just blown away by the two different styles of reporting.
Kpfa went on to interview Catherine Austin Fitts, and you can listen to it all here.
Kpfa, went on to the program entitled ‘Guns and Butter’ which is always good, but today had a must hear interview with George P. Lakoff professor of cognitive linguistics speaking about his book, the ‘Political Mind’. MOA’s will really want to hear this.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 18 2008 1:26 utc | 24

The paradox is that this this whole mess was creaete by a bunch of zealot fanatics who believed in the laissez faire ideology of free markets unbound by propers rules, regulation and supervision.

Or we can say that they are simply crooks. It is actually simple as that. I do not think they “believe” in anything but money grub.

the ruling class defending itself so seamlessly is a revolting spectacle

Why there is no revolt of the people in USA? Are they so bemused?

Let us celebrate: Let fear be matched by joy. Times will get worse, terrifyingly worse, but our spirits will be heartened by the wrong that passes away.

I am sorry to break news to you but the wrong will not pass a way. It’s just restructuring…
I have seen it before…all though some players will suffer the top players are opening champagne as we stare glued to TV and computer monitors in awe…

Posted by: vbo | Sep 18 2008 1:57 utc | 25

A Ripe Moment

We generally recognize that some wicked-massive transfer of wealth occurred in the process of the mortgage fiasco, but it remains to be seen whether any residue of this wealth can actually be retained, as represented by currencies, contracts, and supposed securities. The wholesale settling of debt now underway may leave an awful lot of this stuff with no value.
…Both parties have so far managed to ignore the gathering crisis of banking and money, but they can’t ignore the sequoia trees crashing down around their ankles and shaking the earth they stand on.
…At issue now will be the question of legitimacy in all its human social dimensions. Is our money legitimate? Is the authority of our elected officials legitimate? Are our values and ideas legitimate? These are the things that will determine what kind of future we find ourselves in.

Americans passed long time a go question of legitimacy. Their governments illegitimately bombed and occupied foreign countries …they simply are used to illegitimate doing of their own. Why would that illegitimate doing stop at USA borders?
Fascism did not stop at German borders even if world hoped for it.

At least, then, we can reinstate one cardinal value into the juddering structure of what we claim to believe: that actions have consequences, that you can’t just swindle and loot a society and walk away with the swag.

What an optimist!

Posted by: vbo | Sep 18 2008 2:39 utc | 26

Henry Paulson has lost Control
over US Finance, Economy

When Henry Paulson agreed to leave his job as chairman of the powerful Wall Street investment bank, Goldman Sachs to go to Washington as Treasury Secretary in 2006 he demanded extraordinary powers as de facto economic czar. He got it. Paulson is also head of the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets — the secretary of the treasury and the chairmen of the Federal Reserve Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The Working Group is the financial world’s equivalent of the Pentagon war room. Paulson, not Fed chairman Bernanke, is the person running the Administration’s crisis management. And his recent actions indicate he has lost control as the snowballing problems from the semi -government mortgage companies Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to the collapse of the multi-trillion dollar market in Asset Backed Securities (ABS) to the real economy are compounding into the worst crisis since the 1930’s Great Depression.
…Note the scale of the following store closings across America in recent weeks:…
…The process has only begun and neither major party Presidential candidate has dared to mention this on the ground economic reality, because they evidently have no solutions to offer that would not jeopardize their campaign finances. Obama is tied to not only Pritzker but also to Omaha billionaire, Warren Buffett and George Soros. McCain depends on the traditional money contributions of the Republican Party which demand permanent tax reform for highest income earners and a pro-bank laissez faire treatment of millions of homeowners facing home foreclosure and asset seizure by banks.
…Hundreds of thousands of real estate brokers, small and large bankers, furniture workers and salespeople, and construction workers are unable to find work. Jobs are being cut wholesale and those working are often on reduced hours. Car sales in June plunged by 28% for Ford, 18% for General Motors and even 21% for Toyota which will mean more layoffs in coming weeks. This will be the next wave of unemployment.
…By Williams’ calculations the US economy first entered recession, defined as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth, at the end of 2006. Ever since, the recession has deepened, dramatically so in the past 12 months. Little known is the fact that the Labor Department also publishes six different unemployment statistics from U1, U2 through to U6 being the most comprehensive. The reported “official unemployment” is the very narrowly defined U3 which stands at 5.5%. However, as Williams notes, U6 is the real measure and that officially shows 9.7% unemployed. His calculations put the figure at 13.7% actually unemployed and seeking work.
…The Arizona homebuilder continued, “Today nobody is building. Unsold home inventories are triple that of 2003. Banks no longer give easy credit for home buyers. Many realtors I know have gone two years without selling a home. Empty storefronts are becoming common. In many areas unemployment among construction trades people is 50% or more. Tens of thousands of illegal Mexicans who did most of the manual labor have returned to Mexico to find work. What now? Well, I do handyman projects of all sorts, big or small and make about 70-90% of what it takes to survive with a family of a wife and three young children. My savings make up the rest. That can’t go on for too much longer. We went from affluent and comfortable to nervous and broke with diminished opportunities in just three years. We used to be the middle class.”

Posted by: vbo | Sep 18 2008 3:14 utc | 27

Some notes on the day:
The US voter/taxpayer, in taking ownership of AIG, will be the main loser in any damage from global warming, a phenomenon they did much to create…
In retrospect, the push to privatise social security was really intended to move all these bad debts onto the balance sheets of retirees so the government could walk away from the mess. When that didn’t happen, the debt was moved onto the public/social security balance sheet anyway…
Three-month bill rates fell 46 basis points to 0.23 percent at 9:34 a.m. in New York… TED spread, widened 64 basis points to 283 basis points. That’s the biggest spread since Oct. 20, 1987… The London interbank offered rate, or Libor, rose 19 basis points to 3.06 percent… The increase is the biggest since Sept. 29, 1999, during the run-up to the new millennium…Benchmark 10-year credit-default swaps on Treasuries increased 4 basis points to 30… The contracts have risen from below 2 basis points at the start of the credit crisis in July 2007 and are more than double those on government bonds sold by Austria, Finland or Sweden… AIG’s bonds are also trading at Argentina-in-default levels, 33 cents on the dollar…
Washington Mutual had $143bn in insured deposits on June 30 – about three times the size of the deposit insurance fund, but less than half of its $307bn assets…

Posted by: PeeDee | Sep 18 2008 3:53 utc | 28

vbo # 25,26 & 27–
Agree! Simply: crooks. “Free markets,” “trickle down,” yadayad–all just part of the scam. Jive, as that sort of talk is called.
Whole university Economic Departments and Business Schools bought, sold, paid for–totally corrupt. Not even high-class whores: They went cheap. Media pundits–ditto.
Why no revolt in the US? Sadly, most Americans are both well-propagandized and personally corrupt. As long as abuse happens to somebody else, not us, we don’t care. As long as we are making money, we don’t care. It never occurs to us that it will come home. It never occurs to us that all scams end. The builders and contractors quoted in the piece you cite–whether they acted knowingly or unknowingly they epitomize the corruption at the bottom layers. Whether they knew or did not know, they did not care that they were serving a scam. They don’t care now. They are just sorry that ended. This is moral corruption at the bottom.
At the top? That is what we are watching this week–out in the open with no covering at all! Simple, trillion-dollar theft committed in public!
I am not quite the optimist you think. I did not say ALL wrongs will pass away, for surely they will not. And you are right at least to the extent that the champagne corks are popping, and the Shock-Doctrine Capitalists are celebrating the coming restructurings.
But–though it took well over a decade–the Shock Doctrinists were finally thrown out of Argentina, so you know it is possible. Not likely, it seems, yet possible.
But the physical basis of capitalism really is gone, and won’t be coming back. This is a big change. And though it may take some years, and unfortunately a good deal of suffering for people to realize it, Capitalism really is over.
The real danger is that the vampires simply move on from Capitalism to some new scam, and yes, that is all too possible. America is about to have its head-in-the-toilet moment, which may lead to a desire to seek sanity, but–as anyone who studies addictions knows–equally may not.
In which case the vampires will still be with us.
But whether it goes well or badly–and both are possible–the collapse we are now entering is the window of opportunity.
–Gaianne

Posted by: Gaianne | Sep 18 2008 4:10 utc | 29

speculative capitalism may be reeling, but there’s still that whole ‘means of production’ issue…

Posted by: b real | Sep 18 2008 4:44 utc | 30

A New Role for the Fed: Investor of Last Resort

The Fed’s balance sheet, moreover, is being stretched in ways that seemed unimaginable one year ago. As recently as last summer, the central bank’s entire vault of reserves — about $800 billion at the time — was in Treasury securities.
By last week, the Fed’s holdings of unencumbered Treasuries had dwindled to just over $300 billion. Much of the rest of its assets were in the form of loans to banks and investment banks, which had pledged riskier securities as collateral.
In a sign of how short the Fed’s available reserves had become, the Treasury Department sold tens of billions of dollars of special “supplementary” Treasury bills on Wednesday to provide the Fed with extra cash. The Treasury sold $40 billion of the new securities on Wednesday morning and will sell $60 billion more on Thursday. More money-raising is sure to follow.

Unlike a company or a household, the Fed can raise as much cash as it wants by printing money and buying up Treasuries and other securities at will.

For months now, investment banks have shunned the Fed’s lending program because they feared being perceived as weak. But Mr. Crandall, of Wrightson ICAP, predicted that Lehman and other investment banks might have already tapped it for $50 billion since last weekend.
If they did, Fed officials will be holding collateral that is even riskier than what they already have,

Posted by: b | Sep 18 2008 5:45 utc | 31

And quietly under the radar slips this blitzkreig on everyone’s dwindling 401(k).
The US Supreme Court ruled in February that investors may sue their 401(k) administrators for breach of fiduciary duty. We wrote MoA at that time,
warning everyone to liquify their portfolio for rapid drawdown in the event
their fund is chosen.
What investors don’t seem to realize is the administrators defend the Fund
FROM the Fund, that is, from increased management fees of the Fund. Investors
then, surely large investors, or investors bribed by lawyers for greenmail,
are now on the hook for all the legal fees against the Fund administrators?!
Doesn’t everyone get Trust Fund 101 when they’re a senior in high school?
What, do you think you’re suing Warren Buffett? You’re suing yourselves!!!
This is the legal world’s equivalent of the VC vampire funds, moving in to
drink up your milkshake, with a straw that reaches all the way over to here.
Whiskey The Foxtrot Up!!!!!!

Posted by: Sho Nuff | Sep 18 2008 6:37 utc | 32

There goes Morgan Stanley:
As Fears Grow, Wall St. Titans See Shares Fall

Seeking to avoid the kind of fate that led Lehman and Bear Stearns to collapse, John J. Mack, Morgan Stanley’s chief executive, made an unsuccessful effort on Tuesday evening to persuade Citigroup’s chief executive, Vikram S. Pandit, to enter into a combination, according to people briefed on the talks.
“We need a merger partner or we’re not going to make it,” Mr. Mack told Mr. Pandit, according to two people briefed on the talks. Mr. Pandit, a former senior investment banker at Morgan Stanley, said Citigroup was not interested. It is thinking of deals it can strike with consumer banks, like buying the struggling Washington Mutual out of bankruptcy if its reported efforts to auction itself should fail, that would provide it with cheaper deposit funding. A Citigroup spokeswoman declined to comment.

Posted by: b | Sep 18 2008 7:01 utc | 33

Steven Pearlstein: Scrambling to Clean Up After A Category 4 Financial Storm

In the end, however, there is only so much the government can borrow and so much the government can do. The only other choice is for Americans to finally put their spending in line with their incomes and their need for long-term savings. For any one household, that sounds like a good idea. But if everyone cuts back at roughly the same time, a recession is almost inevitable. That’s a bitter pill in and of itself, involving lost jobs, lower incomes and a big hit to government tax revenues. But it could be serious trouble for regional and local banks that have balance sheets loaded with loans to local developers and builders who will be hard hit by an economic downturn. Think of that, says Dugger, as the inevitable second round of this financial crisis that, alas, still lies ahead.

Posted by: b | Sep 18 2008 7:21 utc | 34

Yet, one of famous USA economist said here on TV something like this:
“Americans are clueless of what is happening, they will only start to understand when they receive their superannuation statements…
In near future if we see bank closed around our cities we’ll know we are doomed”

Posted by: vbo | Sep 18 2008 7:49 utc | 35

VBO: Indeed, I wonder myself how people could let such things pass.
To begin with, this whole nationalising and subsidising of failing US major businesses look quite illegal, both with regard to US laws and to international treaties – someone should bring this the next time any idiot at the WTO wants to “free” some market.
And of course, if the US actually wastes 1’000 billions on such a scam, truly, the people should pick their guns and go and take potshots on their politicians and people working on the financial/banking system. Really, if most of the people had even half a functional brain, there would be speed-trials and mass executions of these numerous murderous crooks before the next administration is sworn in – at the end of the day, you don’t just kill a vampire like capitalism laissez-faire by sitting by while it’s starving, you still have to put a stack into his heart and then chop his head off. At least, people back in 1790 and 1917 had some sense and knew this.
Is our money legitimate? Is the authority of our elected officials legitimate? Are our values and ideas legitimate?
No.
As Atrios used to say, that was another session of Simple answers to simple questions.
we can reinstate one cardinal value into the juddering structure of what we claim to believe: that actions have consequences, that you can’t just swindle and loot a society and walk away with the swag.
I hope he does realise that, for this to happen to the US, literally hundreds of thousands of scum should be shot on the spot and hung from lampposts.

Posted by: CluelessJoe | Sep 18 2008 8:01 utc | 36

Econ Prof and former IMF head Kenneth Rogoff in the FT: America will need a $1,000bn bail-out

Were the financial crisis to end today, the costs would be painful but manageable, roughly equivalent to the cost of another year in Iraq. Unfortunately, however, the financial crisis is far from over, and it is hard to imagine how the US government is going to succeed in creating a firewall against further contagion without spending five to 10 times more than it has already, that is, an amount closer to $1,000bn to $2,000bn.

A large expansion in debt will impose enormous fiscal costs on the US, ultimately hitting growth through a combination of higher taxes and lower spending. It will certainly make it harder for the US to maintain its military dominance, which has been one of the linchpins of the dollar.
The shrinking financial system will also undermine another central foundation of the strength of the US economy. And it is hard to see how the central bank will be able to resist a period of allowing elevated levels of inflation, as this offers a convenient way for the US to deflate the mounting cost of its private and public debts.
It is a very good thing that the rest of the world retains such confidence in America’s ability to manage its problems, otherwise the financial crisis would be far worse.
Let us hope the US political and regulatory response continues to inspire this optimism. Otherwise, sharply rising interest rates and a rapidly declining dollar could put the US in a bind that many emerging markets are all too familiar with.

Posted by: b | Sep 18 2008 9:15 utc | 37

So maybe this crisis will persuade someone to shut down a few bases in Iraq… sort of like selling off a private jet, a yacht, a chalet in Aspen.

Posted by: alabama | Sep 18 2008 9:32 utc | 38

Recommended, though longish
CJR: Boiler Room –
The business press is missing the crooked heart of the credit crisis

It seems to me that well into Year II of the Panic, the business press is in the process of making the same mistake it made in the run-up to the debacle: focusing on esoteric Wall Street concerns and ignoring the simplest, most basic, but most important one—the breathtaking corruption that overran the U.S. lending industry, including and especially the brand names, and the extent to which Wall Street drove that corruption. Let’s just call it a case of over-sophistication. Its persistence, however, will only impede journalists’ ability to cover this thing going forward.

So, that’s what we know: the lending industry used marketing deception—including boiler-room tactics—on a mass scale against a class of financially vulnerable borrowers (which subprime borrowers are, by definition) and other middle-class financial amateurs already laboring with stagnating incomes and rising costs for health care, education, and, of course, housing.
Yet to be explored fully is the extent of Wall Street’s role, the size of the transfer of wealth between classes—from millions of civilians to thousands of professionals—that resulted, and the social and economic consequences of it all.
After that, we can we figure out what we do about it.

Posted by: b | Sep 18 2008 9:34 utc | 39

It seems that the U.S. and the Fed itself have been judged “too big to fail” by their overseas creditors and colleagues. For the moment this coordinated action will likely reassure investors, but one suspects that in due order it will begin to seem like another sign of panic. The virtually invisible role of China and Russia in the “bail out” for the Fed can scarcely escape notice. But then, Iran and Saudi Arabia also seem to absent from the rescue team, so perhaps all will be saved by the fortuitous discovery that the real cause of the collapse-in-progress can been traced to the evil machinations of Al Qaeda.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Sep 18 2008 11:31 utc | 40

CluelessJoe,
None of that will happen until people turn off their television sets, mobile phones and ipods, until people collectively eschew their predilection for professional sports and radio talking heads. Until people remove these onerous distractions, they can not, and will not see, or do, a damn thing, and even if all of that was removed, there’s no guarantee they would take proper action. I truly believe most people lack the ability to think critically. There are numerous reasons for that, not the least of which is our educational system. The majority of Americans are not like the majority of folks who frequent MOA. They simply can’t think, just like a cow, sheep or pig can’t think.

Posted by: Non-Hodgkins | Sep 18 2008 12:00 utc | 41

Hannah,
China is continuing to prop us up because they have so many of their eggs in our basket. We are their number one customer. Nearly one third of their exports are to the U.S. If that market dries up, or diminishes substantially, they suffer along with the U.S., and China is not without its own set of internal issues. They will take it in the pants, at least in the short-term, to keep their best customer happy, just as those manufacturers who sell heavily to Wal-Mart must dance to Wal-Mart’s tune. China’s in some deep shit, sociologically, and demographically. Their population is aging rapidly and the younger generation is gender imbalanced, meaning more boys than girls which can have dire consequences not only for China, but the world, in general. All that untempered testosterone combined with the financial hardships to come can mean only one thing: War.

Posted by: Non-Hodgkins | Sep 18 2008 12:10 utc | 42

Brad Sester’s Follow the Money blog has some worthwhile observations (among a good deal of chaff). I liked this comment aimed at “Helicopter Ben”:

gillies says:
for a picture to illustrate this post – imagine a helicopter dropping confetti into a bonfire.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Sep 18 2008 12:35 utc | 43

Fuck Obama and McCain. What America, and the World, needs now is the unbridled, simplistic Optimism of Chance, The Gardener.
As long as the roots are not severed, all is well, and all will be well, in the Garden.
The most profound movie of our time, by far. Quite pertinent and prescient.

Posted by: Peter | Sep 18 2008 13:22 utc | 44

Robert Saviano being interviewed on his best seller “Gomorrah” now a major film by Matteo Garrone and winner of the Cannes Grand Prix. (With apologies to Snr. Saviano.)
“Italian organised crime the Money Market is an enterprise that generates war. It was responsible for 10,000 deaths in a 30-year period. This ‘enterprise’ is also one of the most powerful in Italy the world and one of the economic strongholds of Europe the the U.S, with business estimated at 150 billion Euros dollars a year. The entire Fiat Group has a gross turnover of 58 billion Euros year.
“Over the last 30 years, the Camorra The Money Market alone has murdered 4,000 people, more than any other criminal organisation or terrorist group. It has killed more people than than the IRA, ETA, Islamic terrorist groups or Cosa Nostra. The numerous clans that make up the Camorra the Money Markets have divided up a densely populated area that includes the provinces of Naples and Caserta all forty eight statesd. The frontiers of this invisible kingdom expand daily and the clans’ command over it is total.
The Camorra The Money Market doesn’t only earn money through illegal drug and arms trafficking or through the protection racket or through the protection racket, but also by doing business in sectors such as construction, tourism, textiles, transport, fuel, distribution, food, supermarkets, restaurants, shops, cinemas and banking. The immense earning generated by these illegal activities are then reinvested in numerous legal activities that extend well beyond national borders. The Camorra The Money Market has thousands of members in every social class. It ‘employs’ children as drug dealers, lookouts, delivery boys and even as soldiers, who go from being teenagers to killers in no time at all.”

Posted by: Spyware | Sep 18 2008 14:30 utc | 45

FT.com / Capital markets – Interbank lending grinds to near-standstill

Interbank lending markets were in crisis on Wednesday as demand for cash sent yields on the three-month US Treasury bill, a beacon of safety, to its lowest level since 1941.

Funding in the short-term lending markets in both the US and Europe was close to a standstill, said traders.

So if I get this right, all money is now rushing to buy treasury bills even when the treasury is throwing money away at the sinking ships. Why?

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Sep 18 2008 14:31 utc | 46

Here comes the helicopter: Central Banks Offer Extra Funds to Calm Money Markets

Sept. 18 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve almost quadrupled the amount of dollars central banks can auction around the world to $247 billion in a coordinated bid to ease the worst crisis facing financial markets since the 1920s.
The Fed increased the amount of dollars that the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and other counterparts can offer from $67 billion “to address the continued elevated pressures in U.S. dollar short-term funding markets.” The Bank of England, the Bank of Canada and the Swiss National Bank also participated.

Posted by: b | Sep 18 2008 15:30 utc | 47

Please don’t forget that this collapse is no surprise at all, at least to those who had the sense to watch the signs for the last few years, or read & listen to those who did.
It was not stupidity allowing it to happen, but careful and persistent planning by certain (unrecognised) entities, for whom destruction of the capital system is a benefit.
No I can’t see just how the entities benefit, and perhaps it could be argued that the system itself, with its dependence on greed as a driver, is/was the culprit and it is just a coincidence that capitalism was chosen years ago in spite of its built in self-destruct feature.
I don’t believe that coincidence stuff though, so I reject that argument. Instead I see this now-ending period of overexpansion (of population, resource raping) being truncated before we reach a fatal point of no return. One might say that Earth is a sentient being and she’s had enough.
The human inhabitants will now have to deal with loss of some familiar comforts, get accustomed to love and cooperation. That is assuming that the entities mentioned above have humanity’s best interests at heart and don’t plan on killing us off. I have faith though.

Posted by: rapt | Sep 18 2008 15:56 utc | 48

Ex-SEC Official Blames Agency for Blow-Up of Broker-Dealers

The SEC allowed five firms — the three that have collapsed plus Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley — to more than double the leverage they were allowed to keep on their balance sheets and remove discounts that had been applied to the assets they had been required to keep to protect them from defaults.
Making matters worse, according to Mr. Pickard, who helped write the original rule in 1975 as director of the SEC’s trading and markets division, is a move by the SEC this month to further erode the restraints on surviving broker-dealers by withdrawing requirements that they maintain a certain level of rating from the ratings agencies.
“They constructed a mechanism that simply didn’t work,” Mr. Pickard said. “The proof is in the pudding — three of the five broker-dealers have blown up.”

More in the link – intentional allowed those companies to leverage 1:30 1:40

Posted by: b | Sep 18 2008 16:03 utc | 49

An interesting development.
Yesterday there was typical ‘flight to safety’ with treasuries going up and their interest rates dropping to nearly zero.
But then news came in that a money market fund ‘broke the buck’. Money market funds often buy short term treasuries next to other interest paying bonds. Two more ‘broke the buck’, i.e. had negative returns, today.
Now we see flight from money market funds
Money funds see record $90 billion one-day drop. People are stacking dollar notes under their mattress.
That should result in a sell off of short term treasuries and a rise in interest rates. Meanwhile a lot of indicators (VIX, various spreads etc.) point to much more volatility ahead.

Posted by: b | Sep 18 2008 18:55 utc | 50

I remember when people in Serbia during Milosevic in 90ies realized that something is very wrong and they run to their banks to pick up their money. Then the banks postponed a delivery of money for 5-7 days…then to 14 days…then they simply stopped giving money to the people simply telling them at counter that they do not have money. Some poor bank officers were even bitten at the cash counter (dangerous job it was, I know my father was one of them).Who ever was lucky enough to get his money from the bank soon realized that it’s not going to worth anything unless we buy German marks (mostly) or other foreign currency. Milosevic’s people organized street dealers for this purpose. We came to the point where “price” of the German mark would jump in half an hour while one would try to find best deal on the street. Gigantic inflation and trade stopped…empty supermarket and closed shops. What ever we needed we had to go on a black market and pay in German marks. Our monthly salaries ended up being 10 German marks…price of one bottle of the shampoo on black market. What ever savings we had we had to live on it… At least we protested and tried to get rid of those bandits of ours.
I actually am trying to forget those times and now I am afraid that I may have to live trough similar situation again…God forbid. And I am not in Serbia any more…I headed “west” (Australia, being practically one of USA states…) in order not to have my children and grandchildren going through the same hardship…Unbelievable…

Posted by: vbo | Sep 19 2008 1:53 utc | 51

Goldman, Sacks………Lehman Brothers……….joo Head of the Fed, etc… The kikes fingerprints are all over this! The sooner the kikes are exterminated once and for all, the better the world will be!

Posted by: walt235 | Sep 24 2008 8:51 utc | 52