For Obama – Biden, Hagel, Sibelius, … ?
For McCain – Ridge, Romney, Elisabeth Cheney, … ?
My bet is Hagel and E. Cheney. But what do I know.
What is your bet?
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
August 19, 2008
VP Choices
For Obama – Biden, Hagel, Sibelius, … ? For McCain – Ridge, Romney, Elisabeth Cheney, … ? My bet is Hagel and E. Cheney. But what do I know. What is your bet?
Comments
I’m actually past caring about the presidential election. “Which republican would you choose?” I’m probably going to waste my vote on Bob Barr (the Looneytarian candidate who was leader of the great Clinton penis hunt of the 1990s). It won’t make a lick of difference anyway, but maybe the Loonytarians will get enough votes to qualify for the debates in 2012. I’m hoping for a civil war before we make it that far, but that’s actually pretty unlikely. Posted by: JimT | Aug 19 2008 14:27 utc | 2 cheney on the ticket? jesus. first i’ve heard of that. Posted by: annie | Aug 19 2008 15:36 utc | 3 Who gives a flying **** which reindeer Santa chooses to help pull his goody wagon? There will be a whole Cabinet team of reindeer chosen by whichever Republican President wins this thing in November. Posted by: Antifa | Aug 19 2008 17:16 utc | 5 Hagel is cool, period. Posted by: alabama | Aug 19 2008 18:34 utc | 6 Bacevich as linked by Billmon, says the election is irrelevant in the big view as the U.S. needs to look at itself to heal its problems which it is unwilling to do. I propose that McBama choose only one candidate for VP. Meaning the same one. Posted by: Tangerine | Aug 19 2008 20:27 utc | 8 listening to airamerica radio it seems clear that biden is the choice of the wobblycrats. i would guess that mccain will choose a woman and clinton would be the logical choice but i am not sure that the democratic women who support her would be able to pull the lever for an R. won’t matter, mccain will take the election as it is turning out to be a repeat of the bush/kerry popularity contest. Posted by: dan of steele | Aug 19 2008 20:30 utc | 9 My money is on Bayh or Biden, Obama thereby signalling his “national security” bona fides, much like Gore did in selecting Joe Lieberman in 2000. Hagel is totally out; picking him would signal Obama’s lack gravitas (lol!) on the “war on terror”™. It would go against Obama’s phantom move to the center/right. Phantom, because he’s been there all along. Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Aug 19 2008 20:44 utc | 10 @ Thrasyboulos, Posted by: dan of steele | Aug 19 2008 21:02 utc | 11 Thank you, Dan of Steele, Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Aug 19 2008 21:12 utc | 12 I tried to imagine Nader-Gonzales elected — maybe Kucinich and Gravel get in on the cabinet, whatever social-justice activist lawyers you care name in the DOJ, Howard Zinn as Secretary of Education for flair. Posted by: Cloud | Aug 19 2008 21:20 utc | 13 The right wing might confuse Elizabeth Cheney with her sister Mary, whose domestic arrangements — same-sex partner and baby — wouldn’t suit them. Posted by: Hamburger | Aug 19 2008 21:22 utc | 14 My feeble google skills have proven unable to find any reference to Elizabeth Cheney as possible Republican VP fodder. Did you make it up, b, or have you some secret contacts that must remain hidden? Posted by: Dick Durata | Aug 19 2008 21:25 utc | 15 Dick-less Cheney? It’s no wonder this girl is a dyke; just look at the representation of men she had growing up. And there’s no way the evangelicals will ever vote for a “homo”, let alone a woman. Posted by: JimT | Aug 19 2008 21:27 utc | 16 From Dan of Steele’s link, it looks like Elizabeth Cheney is a neocon loon loonier than most…might as well consider John Bolton or Douglas Feith. I should think her name would be toxic at this point, her father’s popularity being right down in alien abduction and Elvis sightings territory. Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Aug 19 2008 22:06 utc | 17 Dick-less Cheney? It’s no wonder this girl is a dyke; Posted by: annie | Aug 19 2008 22:21 utc | 19 Yeah. Lesbians are by choice or biology or something. Not a reaction to the Males in their life. Posted by: Jake | Aug 20 2008 0:00 utc | 21 Sorry, didn’t mean to offend. Speaking about something I obviously know nothing about, I guess. I’m not sure the actual election is going to matter much anyway, since a couple more banks are about to fold up their tents and go south. Outsource all the work to China, screw the investors out of their savings, pick fights with strong, well-financed countries, and (s)elect a republican idiot to run the country off of a cliff. Next year this time I’ll probably remember the good old days visiting MoA and watching Bernhard take fascist disinformation apart, while I build a fire and cook the dog I was lucky enough to catch. Posted by: JimT | Aug 20 2008 0:49 utc | 22 By picking Hagel, would be openly breaking with the Democratic Party’s liberal internationalist politburo and lining up with the realists. I don’t think he has the guts to do that. I think Biden is the man, unfortunately. Posted by: Peter Principle | Aug 20 2008 1:22 utc | 23 I’m with Tangerine on this one:
O&M should just choose each other, one the declared VP of the other. Win-win situation. Maybe O & M could alternate, one week on, one week off. The dream tag-team, delivering change and stability, bloody awesome. Posted by: Juan Moment | Aug 20 2008 3:53 utc | 24 Not a reaction to the Males in their life.
i would imagine this might disqualify him. Posted by: annie | Aug 20 2008 4:26 utc | 25 odd, i was just wondering about gore..
what are the odds of another gore Vpresidency? Posted by: annie | Aug 20 2008 4:32 utc | 26 @Alabama, by “cool” in re Hagel, do you mean a guy who talks a good game but who almost always ends up voting with the rethugs on what matters, like our murderous and illegal occupation of Iraq? Posted by: ran | Aug 20 2008 4:46 utc | 27 Barak Obama – Evan Bayh Posted by: Rolling Thunder | Aug 20 2008 5:20 utc | 28 “Which is harder: to be executed, or to suffer the prolonged agony which consists in being trampled to death by geese?” – Kierkegaard Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 20 2008 6:29 utc | 30 ran: “cool” means that I’ve looked deep, deep into his peerless eyes and read his soul…. Posted by: alabama | Aug 20 2008 7:35 utc | 32 As long as the wait lasts, it favors the simple ‘more lies or someone new’ choice. I am optimistic on november, 2008 and that is about all right now. If Gore came in it would cause a lot of enthusiasm for some, but with his eco work it’d be a hard left turn ticket, which might fail to clear the 60% vote needed to overcome vote fraud. With Biden the shallow voterthink would say ‘foreign policy experience’ but you don’t know what’s in the closet and he’d have to leave behind his patronage life as a lifelong cog in history to be an actual voice in it. Senators listen to themselves talk for so long that up is down and down is up, they shouldn’t be presidential candidates but they make good VP ticket material. For McCain the truth is the hair on the wart on the nose of the frog on a bump of a log in the hole at the bottom of the sea. And at this point that is the elephant in the room. Posted by: aumana | Aug 20 2008 8:06 utc | 33 lysander just posted this one in another thread
also
A Book Written to Defeat Obama
McCain’s ‘Cone of Silence’ Caper
Posted by: b real | Aug 20 2008 14:57 utc | 35 I always said, Hillary cannot, could not, be elected to the presidency (or win facing the Lightbringer), and she did not. And always said, Mc Cain will win, now the polls and so on (see b real just above at 35) are beginning to reflect that. That movement will continue steadily, and the polls will slowly cross over. Posted by: Tangerine | Aug 20 2008 18:55 utc | 37 It will be perceived to be close. Close enough to steal. Again. Posted by: beq | Aug 21 2008 11:32 utc | 38 leiberman.. this is the worst scenario (as i’ve mentioned before). after years of wanting cheneys ticker to go out, mcCain’s will be the one to give, right after the gop steals another. a lieberman presidency. completely unacceptable. we might as well just put another star on the flag. w/6 points. Posted by: annie | Aug 21 2008 16:21 utc | 39 I believe the Bilderberg group picked Sebelius and Sanford. Posted by: Susan | Aug 22 2008 2:34 utc | 40 The McCain camp has set the stage with these books & movie. Hence, no more nicey-nicey & its going to get very rough in the campaign if not outright dirty. Posted by: jony_b_cool | Aug 22 2008 5:04 utc | 41 |
||