Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 5, 2008
Suskind’s CIA Claim and the Niger Forgeries

As Politico writes about Ron Suskind’s new book:

Suskind claims that the White House ordered the CIA to forge a back-dated, handwritten letter from the head of Iraqi intelligence to Saddam Hussein.

Suskind writes in “The Way of the World,” to be published Tuesday, that the alleged forgery – adamantly denied by the White House – was designed to portray a false link between Hussein’s regime and al Qaeda as a justification for the Iraq war.

The letter’s existence has been reported before, and it had been written about as if it were genuine. It was passed in Baghdad to a reporter for The (London) Sunday Telegraph who wrote about it on the front page of Dec. 14, 2003, under the headline, “Terrorist behind September 11 strike ‘was trained by Saddam.’”

The Telegraph story by Con Coughlin (which, coincidentally, ran the day Hussein was captured in his “spider hole”) was touted in the U.S. media by supporters of the war, and he was interviewed on NBC’s "Meet the Press."

Rereading the original Coughlin story:

Details of Atta’s visit to the Iraqi capital in the summer of 2001, just weeks before he launched the most devastating terrorist attack in US history, are contained in a top secret memo written to Saddam Hussein, the then Iraqi president, by Tahir Jalil Habbush al-Tikriti, the former head of the Iraqi Intelligence Service.


The second part of the memo, which is headed "Niger Shipment", contains a report about an unspecified shipment – believed to be uranium – that it says has been transported to Iraq via Libya and Syria.

Although Iraqi officials refused to disclose how and where they had obtained the document, Dr Ayad Allawi, a member of Iraq’s ruling seven-man Presidential Committee, said the document was genuine.

"We are uncovering evidence all the time of Saddam’s involvement with al-Qaeda," he said. "But this is the most compelling piece of evidence that we have found so far. It shows that not only did Saddam have contacts with al-Qaeda, he had contact with those responsible for the September 11 attacks."

Allawi is well known to be a CIA asset and seems to well have been the messenger between CIA and Coughlin.

When the White House ordered the CIA to forge the letter with regard to al-Qaeda, it also ordered to include something that furthered their claim on Niger uranium shipment. When the Coughlin story appeared the Niger claim had already been debunked. I wonder why it was included at all.

We still do not know if the original Niger uranium claims, written on paper stolen from the Niger embassy in Rome, were an operation run outside the administration through Michel ‘Cauldron’ Ledeen or a direct White House/CIA operation.

If Suskind is correct this increases the likelihood that both the Atta case and the Niger forgeries were genuine CIA products.



Sidenote:
In 2006 Judith Miller Con Coughlin claimed that Iran is training al-Qaeda.

Comments

so maybe tenet’s slam dunk was predicated on a hat trick or two?

Posted by: b real | Aug 5 2008 16:56 utc | 1

it has gone well beyond farce into the grotesque

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Aug 5 2008 17:40 utc | 2

i’m shocked

Posted by: annie | Aug 5 2008 17:45 utc | 3

Is this a surprise to anyone with half a brain. Our president and his crew have actively sought ways around the truth on just about every major issue. They spin things every which thay can and when spin isn’t enough they simply lie. His agenda was to avenge the threat on his father and it has cost us all the lives of great young Ameicans and an economically sound future. He should be impeached and forced to leave office in total disgrace.

Posted by: steve warcholak | Aug 5 2008 19:05 utc | 4

It is nice to have new data coming out, more’s the shame on the RNC and aspirant McEmpire. Keep them coming, Jim! You’ll be a reporter someday yet..

Posted by: aumana | Aug 5 2008 19:40 utc | 5

There is a big blowup going on in the States just now over who is the culprit behind the anthrax attacks that helped sell the war against Saddam. I think information like this (your post) makes it at least possible that the anthrax attacks were an official black opp. A black-flag, if you will.
I think that the current administration would stop at nothing to achieve their aims, even if it meant the destruction of half the world. (or more)

Posted by: Buckaroo | Aug 5 2008 20:17 utc | 6

yes, there’s lots of rolling eye emoticons around the conspiracy haunts these days as the farce, as ‘giap says, gets grotesque.
it seems some people are even more willing to finally consider that–gasp!–maybe this administration’s role during “the great attack on freedom” went beyond sitting on foreknowledge.
i suspect we’ll continue to see dirt getting dumped as november approaches…that is of course until the next shock happens.
lately i’ve been wondering what would happen if, say, an aging, apparently senile candidate for president suddenly dies before the big election. what’s the protocol for choosing an emergency candidate? would the vice presidential candidate step up? who will that VP be for said aging, senile presidential candidate?
really we might not even know who amerika’s next president could be. two very important selections have yet to be made.

Posted by: Lizard | Aug 6 2008 2:11 utc | 7

The emergency presidential candidate would be our current vice president, under the Constitution. Bush can’t serve another term, but Cheney can serve *two* as the CiC,
and fly back and forth every weekend to his palatial estate in Dubai on Air Force 1.
If John “Birch” McCain lives until the elections, actually, beyond the inauguration,
then maybe Cindy will have to be his VP running mate, because nobody else wants it.
Husband and wife, CiC/VP? Birch’rs and DARs would engage in orgiastic wikkan paganry in the Black Forests around with Northern Virginia with Defense vampires and wizards.
You’re invited, John & Cindy McCain 4th Reich, ‘well-intentioned and deserving’ only.

Posted by: Blue Moon | Aug 6 2008 4:45 utc | 8

Cindy McCain? You mean the future Mrs Buffalo Chip?
Husband John? Clueless beyond imagination.

Posted by: anna missed | Aug 6 2008 5:48 utc | 9

Unfortunately the “operative phrase” in the Politico text is “…alleged forgery – adamantly denied by the White House…”. In the absence of documentation (a piece of creamy White House stationery?) or corroboration by “credible” sources the true believers will be quite able to defend their dogmata and paladins. Tenet’s denial can be parsed as a non-denial (the “White House”, an inanimate object, can not impart orders), but this is undoubtedly too Clintonesque a reading of his statement. More to the point is the fact that even if one, in an excess of charity, allows Tenet the benefit of a doubt, there are undoubtedly other spookish nooks within the U.S. or allied intelligence establishments who might have been willing and able to give a hand in, or even sponsor, such a project. The “White House” proclivity for keeping its own spooks in the dark is not a recent innovation.
So, while Sussind’s revelations, if true, certainly come as no surprise to those who have attempted to trace other instances of neocon mendacity, they will undoubtedly be dismissed by the ever smaller band of Bushian true believers. Indeed, there is even the possibility that this “revelation” has been concocted to pre-emptively discredit better documented accounts which are still over the horizon. (The case of CBS’s mishandling of Bush’s military non-service records should be born in mind.)
The half-life of such falsehoods can be several decades or more.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Aug 6 2008 6:45 utc | 10

lizard lately i’ve been wondering what would happen if, say, an aging, apparently senile candidate for president suddenly dies before the big election.
or after. supposedly Cantor is in top line. McCain wins the nomination and presto..

The addition of Jewish Congressman Eric Cantor’s name to the list of possible running mates for Republican presidential candidate John McCain is most certainly a source of pride for the American Jewish community. Even though most Jews traditionally vote for the Democrats, a McCain-Cantor ticket would mean that for just the second time a Jew would (almost) reach the finish line.

wsj McCain Vets Cantor as Running Mate

Rep. Cantor is co-chairman of Sen. McCain’s Jewish outreach efforts and is charged with raising at least $10 million for his presidential campaign. Speculation about his vice-presidential prospects was also fueled following a private lunch in mid-July with his wife and Sen. McCain at Revlon mogul Ronald Perelman’s Hamptons residence.
A handful of Rep. Cantor’s Washington and Virginia allies have been quietly agitating to elevate his profile in the vice-presidential discussion for months.
Beau Phillips, a partner at Chlopak Leonard Schechter in Washington, D.C., launched ericcantorforvp.com in June, in conjunction with other Cantor allies, including former Virginia Attorney General Jerry Kilgore. The site has had about 100,000 hits and about 4,000 signatures to its online petition asking Sen. McCain to tap Rep. Cantor for the ticket.

Posted by: annie | Aug 6 2008 7:26 utc | 11

Cantor? Noooooooooooooooooooooooo.
[well, it’d get him outta my neighborhood]

Posted by: beq | Aug 6 2008 11:06 utc | 12

Practically everything that the CTs said about the Niger yellow cake forgeries, and the anthrax attacks, and the links between Saddam and 9/11, very rapidly after they happened, is either turning out to be true or is gaining acceptance, or at least is being reconsidered. But that is 5-7 years after the fact! Too late.
Now, for ex. the mainstream media and blogosphere are vociferously questioning Ivin’s culpability. Hatfill’s was contested only by himself (hats off to him for persevering), and ignored pundits on the internets. Of course Ivins is a different case, because he is no longer here and there will never be a court case, so the MSM’s speculation can even be lodged under the rubric ‘helping to tie up loose ends.’

Posted by: Tangerine | Aug 7 2008 6:53 utc | 13

ex CIA Philip Giraldi on Suskind’s claim: asserts

My source also notes that Dick Cheney, who was behind the forgery, hated and mistrusted the Agency and would not have used it for such a sensitive assignment. Instead, he went to Doug Feith’s Office of Special Plans and asked them to do the job. The Pentagon has its own false documents center, primarily used to produce fake papers for Delta Force and other special ops officers traveling under cover as businessmen. It was Feith’s office that produced the letter and then surfaced it to the media in Iraq. Unlike the Agency, the Pentagon had no restrictions on it regarding the production of false information to mislead the public. Indeed, one might argue that Doug Feith’s office specialized in such activity.

Possible, but I don’t think Suskind lied here. Also Allawi, noted in the Coughlin story is CIA, not Pentagon.

Posted by: b | Aug 8 2008 14:46 utc | 14

not so different than hersh’s stovepiping re the niger docs.

Another explanation was provided by a former senior C.I.A. officer. He had begun talking to me about the Niger papers in March, when I first wrote about the forgery, and said, “Somebody deliberately let something false get in there.” He became more forthcoming in subsequent months, eventually saying that a small group of disgruntled retired C.I.A. clandestine operators had banded together in the late summer of last year and drafted the fraudulent documents themselves.
The agency guys were so pissed at Cheney,” the former officer said. “They said, ‘O.K, we’re going to put the bite on these guys.’ ” My source said that he was first told of the fabrication late last year, at one of the many holiday gatherings in the Washington area of past and present C.I.A. officials. “Everyone was bragging about it—‘Here’s what we did. It was cool, cool, cool.’ ” These retirees, he said, had superb contacts among current officers in the agency and were informed in detail of the sismi intelligence.
“They thought that, with this crowd, it was the only way to go—to nail these guys who were not practicing good tradecraft and vetting intelligence,” my source said. “They thought it’d be bought at lower levels—a big bluff.” The thinking, he said, was that the documents would be endorsed by Iraq hawks at the top of the Bush Administration, who would be unable to resist flaunting them at a press conference or an interagency government meeting. They would then look foolish when intelligence officials pointed out that they were obvious fakes. But the tactic backfired, he said, when the papers won widespread acceptance within the Administration. “It got out of control.”
Like all large institutions, C.I.A. headquarters, in Langley, Virginia, is full of water-cooler gossip, and a retired clandestine officer told me this summer that the story about a former operations officer faking the documents is making the rounds. “What’s telling,” he added, “is that the story, whether it’s true or not, is believed”—an extraordinary commentary on the level of mistrust, bitterness, and demoralization within the C.I.A. under the Bush Administration. (William Harlow, the C.I.A. spokesman, said that the agency had no more evidence that former members of the C.I.A. had forged the documents “than we have that they were forged by Mr. Hersh.”)
The F.B.I. has been investigating the forgery at the request of the Senate Intelligence Committee. A senior F.B.I. official told me that the possibility that the documents were falsified by someone inside the American intelligence community had not been ruled out. “This story could go several directions,” he said. “We haven’t gotten anything solid, and we’ve looked.” He said that the F.B.I. agents assigned to the case are putting a great deal of effort into the investigation. But “somebody’s hiding something, and they’re hiding it pretty well.”

Posted by: annie | Aug 8 2008 15:12 utc | 15

timeline on hersh’s article 10/27/03, 6 weeks prior to Coughlin’s story appearing in the telegraph.

Posted by: annie | Aug 8 2008 15:29 utc | 16

John Conason: New evidence suggests Ron Suskind is right

On Dec. 11, 2003 — three days before the Telegraph launched its “exclusive” on the Habbush memo — the Washington Post published an article by Dana Priest and Robin Wright headlined “Iraq Spy Service Planned by U.S. to Stem Attacks.” Buried inside on Page A41, their story outlined the CIA’s efforts to create a new Iraqi intelligence agency:
“Badran and Ayad Allawi, leader of the INA, are spending much of this week at CIA headquarters in Langley to work out the details of the new program. Both men have worked closely with the CIA over the past decade in unsuccessful efforts to incite coups against Saddam Hussein.” (The Web link to the full story is broken but it can be found on Nexis.)”
So Allawi was at the CIA during the week before Coughlin got that wonderful scoop. That may not be proof of anything, either, but a picture is beginning to form.

Posted by: b | Aug 8 2008 18:09 utc | 17

Suskind releasing transcript of ‘forgery’ source

Suskind told MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough on Friday, “I’ve never done this in 25 years as a journalist, but I’m posting transcripts of my conversations with Rob Richer.”
Suskind further explained, “Rob can only say from first-hand knowledge that it’s from the White House. That means either the vice president’s office, the president’s office, or the NSC. … [CIA chief] George [Tenet] came back from the White House one day with, essentially, the memo sheet .. with the mission to create this fabricated letter.”

Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 8 2008 21:35 utc | 18

oops, that last one was me. here’s more

Tape: Top CIA official confesses order to forge Iraq-9/11 letter came on White House stationery

The denial, however, directly contradicts Richer’s own remarks in the transcript.
“Now this is from the Vice President’s Office is how you remembered it–not from the president?” Suskind asked.
“No, no, no,” Richer replied, according to the transcript. “What I remember is George [Tenet] saying, ‘we got this from’–basically, from what George said was ‘downtown.'”
“Which is the White House?” Suskind asked.
“Yes,” Richer said. “But he did not–in my memory–never said president, vice president, or NSC. Okay? But now–he may have hinted–just by the way he said it, it would have–cause almost all that stuff came from one place only: Scooter Libby and the shop around the vice president.”
“But he didn’t say that specifically,” Richer added. “I would naturally–I would probably stand on my, basically, my reputation and say it came from the vice president.”
“But there wasn’t anything in the writing that you remember saying the vice president,” Suskind continued.
“Nope,” Richer said.
“It just had the White House stationery.”
“Exactly right.”
Later, Richer added, “You know, if you’ve ever seen the vice president’s stationery, it’s on the White House letterhead. It may have said OVP (Office of the Vice President). I don’t remember that, so I don’t want to mislead you.”

there’s more

Posted by: annie | Aug 9 2008 2:52 utc | 19

not necessarily related,
the following is from tim shorrock’s book spies for hire: the secret world of intelligence outsourcing in the chapter on “booz allen hamilton and ‘the shadow IC'” (intel community)
BAH is one of the largest private contractors working w/ the USG ($1.6 bill in USG contracts in 2006) and “’employs more than 10,000 TS/SCI cleared personnel.” TS?SCI stands for Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information, the highest possible security rating in the IC. This would make Booz Allen one of the largest employers of cleared personnel in the United States. Booz Allen has ‘the biggest chunk of recent former CIA people of any of the corporations’ involved in contracting, says John Gannon, the former director of the CIA’s National Intelligence Council…”

[James] Woolsey, the former director of the CIA, was another key hire from the Intelligence Community. In 2002, he was brought in as a vice president in Booz Allen’s Global Strategic Security service, where his job is to work with the CEOs of major corporations to integrate security into their strategic business planning. (Woolsey’s team, the company notes, includes “former leaders of the nation’s highest security and intelligence agencies, as well as experts in cyber-security, global-supply chain management and wargame-scenario planning.”)
Woolsey also provides an important link to the foreign policy apparatus of the George W. Bush administration. He is one of the chief ideologists of the neoconservative movement behind Bush’s aggressive military and national security policies, and is famous in Washington for his fanatical devotion to the cause of regime change in Iraq and his outspoken views on the war on terror, which he describes in apocalyptic terms as “World War IV.” His political views brought important dividends to Booz Allen: from 2001 to 2006, he was a key member of Donald Rumsfeld’s Defense Policy Board. Shortly after the 9/11 attacks, he was dispatched by Paul Wolfowitz, then Rumsfeld’s deputy, to Europe to find a connection between Saddam Hussein and the events of 9/11. He also served for five years on an advisory group that met monthly with former CIA director George Tenet to discuss policy issues. Through Woolsey, Booz Allen had a ringside seat on the war on terror and the invasion of Iraq, which created enormous contracting opportunities for the consulting firm and its many corporate clients.

the footnote for that paragraph reads

Woolsey is also the chairman and chief spokesman for the reborn Committee on the Present Danger, a right-wing policy group that advocates “total victory” in the war against terrorism, and was a founding member and senior adviser to the Libby Legal Defense Trust, a group of conservatives who raised money to help former Cheney adviser I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby defend himself against charges that he lied to a grand jury investigating the outing of former CIA operative Valerie Plame. …

Posted by: b real | Aug 9 2008 15:55 utc | 20