Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 29, 2008
Georgia Propaganda and the Next Step

The Guardian editors falsely remark:

Something shattered when the Georgian artillery opened up with a massive barrage on Tskhinvali on August 7 (Colonel Arsen Tsukhishvili, chief of staff of the Artillery Brigade said with pride that 300 of his gun barrels fired at the enemy simultaneously). What broke was not only the columns of Russian tanks the Georgian artillery was aiming at.

As Joshua Foust notes, these are ex-post-facto justifications:

Saakashvili continues to use gullible journalists to push the lie
that he advanced in South Ossetia to head off a column of Russian tanks
bearing down on Tskhinvali. The complaint about the tanks did not show
up in any interviews with Saakashvili or any of his officials until,
near as I can tell, Mr. Worms told Mr. Totten about it—now that meme is cropping up in many interviews with Georgian officials.

I would guess, if Russia actually was moving tanks through the Roki
tunnel into South Ossetia, Georgia would have been complaining about it
in the hour before they launched their cease-fire offensive into the
breakaway region. Or they would have raised it at the emergency UNSC
meeting on August 7th/8th. Or it would have been mentioned at all
before August 25—perhaps in one of Saakashvili’s many op-eds in Western papers.

It is really funny how this works in the ‘western’ media.

Meanwhile some circles are building up an alternative to Saakashvili. Nino Burjanadze was a member of the Georgian parliament since 1995 with then president Eduard Shevardnadze’s party. She later joined Saakashvili in the U.S. managed rose revolution. In April she split with Saakashvili and last month she left the parliament and opened her own think-tank, the ‘Foundation for Democracy and Development‘ in Tbilisi. The U.S. and the Russian ambassadors took part in the inauguration.

When the British foreign minister went to Tbilisi on August 21, he had an hour long meeting with her. Yesterday she met with Joe Biden in Denver.

It is not that she is much different from a policy standpoint than Saakashvili. Her father’s business money brought her into politics and it is alleged that he was a big beneficent of corruption under Shevardnadze. But Burjanadze can be expected to run a ‘western’ course without rocking the boat too much and without unnecessarily angering the bear.

A few month from now the Guardian editors will damn Saakashvili and laud Burjanadze into the Georgian presidency.

Comments

b,
Great Blog! Thanks.

Posted by: Mark Gaughan | Aug 29 2008 14:09 utc | 1

I don’t know that you should cite the Guardian as typical Western media. It has been noticeably war-mongering and anti-Russian over Georgia – unusual for a liberal newspaper. I don’t know what’s up with them over this crisis.

Posted by: Alex | Aug 29 2008 17:15 utc | 2

seamus milne – georgia the graveyard of uniplaris

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Aug 29 2008 19:02 utc | 3

Georgia says cutting diplomatic ties with Russia
That will teach ’em!

Posted by: b | Aug 29 2008 19:23 utc | 4

Some harsh economic sanctions against Russia will now be discussed at a gathering of Europe’s head honchos on Monday morning. You know, stop buying stuff from Russia, just like Russia suddenly canceled all purchases of pork and chicken parts from the US this week.
Ah, Europe! Where realpolitik has long held sway! Where God and Nietzsche are both dead! Where 26% of all fossil fuels burned by industry and households comes in a pipeline! From Russia!
With love?
But soft — Moscow is full of official rumors that Russia’s oil majors have all received orders from Medvedev to Experience Significant Technical Difficulties With That European Pipeline around 8 AM on Monday morning.
Apparently the damned thing needs its bolts loosened, and then tightened. May need it a few times, until it works just right again. And it takes a special wrench. That’s only made in Tskhinvali. And supplies have been interrupted, lately. Shame, that.
Sad to say, but sanctions talks are not sanctions. They don’t even feel like sanctions. Unfortunately, they merely contribute to global warming via escaping hot air, most of it carbon dioxide mixed with ringing, ten dollar phrases.
Significant Technical Difficulties at 8 AM with a major artery to the Continent are not sanctions, either. They just feel like it. In fact, they feel like a heart attack. Fortunately, such Technical Difficulties actually decrease global warming via the mechanism of Western Europeans burning less fuel, wearing more layers, driving less, and paying more for whatever burnables do come through the pipeline.
I once saw a big piece of empty pipeline, before it got bolted into the line. Amazing. You can see the world real clearly through an empty pipe.
What else? Oh, yes. An excerpt from Dick Cheney’s upcoming book, Bear Hunting for Dummies:
“S’okay! Go ahead! Poke it with a sharp stick! It’s hibernating!”

Posted by: Antifa | Aug 29 2008 20:06 utc | 5

FRANKIE.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 29 2008 20:13 utc | 6

It just dawned on me perhaps, some may not get the meaning of the above #6
so I add this:
Two Tribes

The single was released at the height of the cold war, when general fears about global nuclear warfare were at a peak. Although Johnson would attest in a 1984 radio interview that the “two tribes” of the song potentially represented any pair of warring adversaries (giving the examples of “cowboys and Indians or Captain Kirk and Klingons”), the song does contain the line “On the air America/I modelled shirts by Van Heusen”, a clear reference to then US President Ronald Reagan, who had advertised for Phillips Van Heusen in 1953 (briefly reviving the association in the early 1980s), and whose first film had been titled Love Is On The Air.
Johnson also noted: “There’s two elements in the music — an American funk line and a Russian line. It’s the most obvious demonstration of two tribes that we have today.”[1]
To accentuate this inherent musical tension, Horn juxtaposed the driving funk/rock rhythm section with a dramatic formal string arrangement and plenty of orchestral stabs, a novel technique that Horn himself had pioneered the previous year in producing Yes’s “Owner of a Lonely Heart”.
ZTT aggressively marketed the single in terms of its topical political angle, promoting it with images of the group wearing American military garb in combat, as well as Soviet-style army uniforms set against an American urban backdrop.
The original cover art featured a Soviet mural of Lenin and images of Reagan and then UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. The sleeve notes, attributed to ZTT’s Paul Morley, dispassionately reported details of the relative nuclear arsenals of each superpower and the unknown power of “synergisms”. The various mixes were subtitled in terms of the expected aftermath of nuclear conflict.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 29 2008 20:37 utc | 7

The Financial Times has also been remarkably unneutral and anti-Russian in its coverage of this Georgia business.
I suspect the City of London sees a lot riding on this.

Posted by: lysias | Aug 29 2008 21:04 utc | 8

Transcript of CNN Vladimir Putin interview.
http://tinyurl.com/5vdtma

Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Aug 29 2008 22:17 utc | 9

So how did we arrive at this juncture ? Yet another instance of inevitable blowback due to previous hubris ?

The Conflict We Chose
By Mark Weisbrot
Tensions between the United States and Russia have a long history, but one only need go back to the early nineties to see how our own government threw away its chance to have a better relationship with post-Communist Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
In 1992, inflation in Russia was spiraling into the triple digits and the economy was collapsing. Economist Jeffrey Sachs, who was advising the government, offered a plan to get inflation under control which centered around stabilizing the exchange rate – a key element of a potentially successful anti-inflationary policy. To do this, though, it is necessary to have a good supply of foreign exchange reserves – i.e. dollars — and Sachs thought he might get a commitment from the United States to provide these reserves. He was wrong. He didn’t get the stabilization fund, nor the immediate suspension of interest payments, debt cancellation, or other aid he was seeking from the G-7.

Posted by: Outraged | Aug 30 2008 10:09 utc | 10

So how did we arrive at this juncture ? Yet another instance of inevitable blowback due to previous hubris ?

The Conflict We Chose
By Mark Weisbrot
Tensions between the United States and Russia have a long history, but one only need go back to the early nineties to see how our own government threw away its chance to have a better relationship with post-Communist Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
In 1992, inflation in Russia was spiraling into the triple digits and the economy was collapsing. Economist Jeffrey Sachs, who was advising the government, offered a plan to get inflation under control which centered around stabilizing the exchange rate – a key element of a potentially successful anti-inflationary policy. To do this, though, it is necessary to have a good supply of foreign exchange reserves – i.e. dollars — and Sachs thought he might get a commitment from the United States to provide these reserves. He was wrong. He didn’t get the stabilization fund, nor the immediate suspension of interest payments, debt cancellation, or other aid he was seeking from the G-7.

Posted by: Outraged | Aug 30 2008 10:10 utc | 11

According to Der Spiegel in German the OSCE which had some 30 military observers in Georgia/South Ossetia, has received reports from these observers that Georgia prepared the attack intensively and that Georgia started the attack before any Russian tanks went through the Roki tunnel.
So that’s 180 degree from what the new propaganda wave is saying.

Posted by: b | Aug 30 2008 11:01 utc | 12

Did the Russians purposely, *ahem*, ‘miss’ the pipeline ? In order to send a far more effective message ?

Craters show Russia just missed Georgian pipeline
AKHALI-SAMGORI, Georgia (Reuters) – Russian planes dropped bombs this month within 15 metres (50 feet) of a pipeline that British oil company BP was in the process of reopening through Georgia, according to witnesses.
Residents on Friday showed Reuters correspondents deep craters alongside the pipeline, which runs between Azerbaijan’s capital Baku, on the Caspian Sea, and Georgia’s Black Sea port of Supsa.
— snip —
Next to a marker post above the underground pipeline, in a parched, open landscape 25 km (15 miles) from the border with Azerbaijan, three craters were visible within 15 metres of it. The largest was about three metres deep and eight in diameter.
A line of craters could be seen running perpendicular to the pipeline for a distance of more than one km. In one place, cattle were grazing beside a churned-up area larger than a soccer pitch, with two large craters in the middle.
— snip —
BP spokesman Matt Taylor said the company was aware of the bombing near the pipeline but did not wish to comment.
— snip —
Taylor said it was hard to say when the smaller Baku-Supsa pipeline could reopen.
“We just want to get it up and running as soon as we can but it’s very hard to put a timeline on it right now,” he said.
“The operation’s been put on hold until we can assess the impact of this conflict on the integrity of this pipeline.”
He said BP would be closely following the Russia-Georgia crisis.

Posted by: Outraged | Aug 30 2008 11:10 utc | 13

These accounts (from wounded Georgian soldiers) don’t seem to corroborate Georgia’s claimed sequence of events and therefore defence re it’s ‘initiating’ incursion …

Georgia’s wounded troops tell of their surprise when Russia attacked
James Hider in Tbilisi
Major Malkhaz Dumbatze was in a celebratory mood. His 14 Georgian tanks had just taken control of the rebel South Ossetian capital, Tskhinvali, and he was already looking forward to a trip to Israel to study new battle command systems. The jets flying over the city, where his men were mopping up Ossetian snipers, he took to be Georgian fighters.

Posted by: Outraged | Aug 30 2008 12:53 utc | 14

OSZE-Beobachter machen Georgien massive Vorwürfe
In der Zentrale der Organisation für Sicherheit und Zusammenarbeit in Europa (OSZE) häufen sich offenbar Hinweise auf ein massives Fehlverhalten der georgischen Führung, das zum Ausbruch der Krise beigetragen hat. Nach Informationen des SPIEGEL sind auf informellen Kanälen Berichte von OSZE-Militärbeobachtern aus der Kaukasusregion an verschiedene Regierungsstellen in Berlin gelangt. Demnach habe Georgien den Militärschlag gegen Südossetien intensiv vorbereitet und seinen Angriff begonnen, bevor russische Panzer den Verbindungstunnel nach Südossetien befuhren. In den Berichten sei von möglichen georgischen Kriegsverbrechen die Rede. So berichten OSZE-Beobachter davon, dass die georgische Führung die südossetischen Zivilisten im Schlaf habe angreifen lassen.
http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/vorab/0,1518,575357,00.html
In short: OSZE observers noted intense Georgian preparations, and their attack on SO before the Russians came through the tunnel.

Posted by: FkD | Aug 30 2008 14:30 utc | 15

Oops … repost …
FkD

Posted by: FkD | Aug 30 2008 14:37 utc | 16