Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 11, 2008
They Call This Reporting …

In a clearly partisan article the Observer writes:

In a speech on Friday that triggered the worst violence since the civil war that tore the country apart between 1975 and 1990, Nasrallah pledged to ‘cut the hand’ that touched his fighters’ weapons and rockets, accusing the ruling coalition of being ‘Israelis dressed in suits speaking Arabic’.

So who "triggered" this strife? Was it really Nasrallah? How does that fit with this view further down in the piece:

‘Tackling the airport and telephone system was the first time since the Syrian withdrawal that the government has taken practical measures to deal with the resistance,’ said Patrick Haenni , Beirut-based analyst for the International Crisis Group. ‘This was a paradigm shift by the government and it was met by a paradigm shift by Hizbollah, who said they would never turn their weapons in.’

So who triggered?

And the "worst violence since the civil war"? Somehow the indiscriminent bombing Israel did during its 2006 lost war on Lebanon, with over a 1,000 civilian death, seem to have been much violent and worse than the twenty something dead on all sides in this episode.

But maybe we should just forget about that?

Comments

Why not? Most Americans can’t find Lebanon on a map and forgot about Israel’s failed invasion if they even heard about it in the first place. Now go back to shopping to help the war effort you treasonous progressives and let the big people talk! Oink Oink!

Posted by: Diogenes | May 11 2008 12:13 utc | 1

I am so ashamed for my country…..

Posted by: IntelVet | May 11 2008 14:59 utc | 2

Come on Diogenes,…
U.S. Americans, don’t have maps and such as the Iraq… You know that. Right? ;-)P

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 11 2008 15:23 utc | 3

the endless & infinite shame of the scum that would call themselves ‘journalists’ but are instead like that beast of the sea that lives on death – the slime eel

Posted by: remembereringgiap | May 11 2008 15:59 utc | 4

modern journalism

Posted by: remembereringgiap | May 11 2008 16:02 utc | 5

Juan Cole reading the world press:

Reading news about Iraq is like watching Bill Murray’s ‘Groundhog Day’ in which you have to live through the same day over and over again. So the US and Iraqi governments have announced a new campaign against Sunni radicals in Ninevah province, especially Mosul….
Ninevah governor Duraid Kashmula admitted to Al-Hayat that Mosul “has come to dominated by the leaders of al-Qaeda…”
What??! Mosul is Iraq’s second largest city at 1.7 million, and it is under the control of “al-Qaeda”? How long has this been the case? All this time? While the US press was reveling in the “calm” in the country?
…the clear evidence of the falsehood of the Pentagon talking points about a “calm Iraq” … doesn’t prevent them from being conveyed unexamined right to the front page.

Posted by: small coke | May 11 2008 16:51 utc | 6

Ahh, the WWW Porn Cult of Pop Personalities Experience
All You Need to Know

Posted by: Ariel Von Boulow | May 11 2008 16:55 utc | 7

There is an interesting point to make on this Al Jazeera piece of fights in Lebanon outside of Beirut

Heavy fighting has broken out between pro-government and opposition supporters in Lebanon’s central mountains overlooking the capital, Beirut.

Walid Jumblatt, a prominent pro-government politician and a leader of Lebanon’s Druze community, urged Talal Arslan, a Druze rival allied with the Hezbollah-led opposition, to place the affected regions under army rule.

Earlier on Sunday, in the northern city of Tripoli, at least one person was killed in clashes between supporters of the government and the opposition.

An army officer said government supporters fought loyalists of an Alawite sect with links to Hezbollah in the Bab al-Tebbaneh, Kobel and Jabal Mohsen neighbourhoods.

1. This shows the lie that the whole conflict is some Shia-Sunni one.
We have Druze fighting Druze and Jumblatt is loosing. Fine with me – he started this whole round by issueing the threats to Hizbullah.
In the north there are Allewits fighting who-knows. Allewits are not Shia.
This is neither an ethnic nor a religion-sectarion fight but a fight of disenfranchised (economical and electoral) against the better-off and their mercinaries.
Keep in mind that several groups in Lebanon, not only the Shia are screwed by the election law which puts shares of seats to sects in a idiotic way. (Shia are 40% of the population and get only 20% of the parliament seats which, of course, leads to economic disadvantages)

Posted by: b | May 11 2008 18:15 utc | 8

FLC: Sunday, May 11, 2008
Siniora: “Israel never committed such crimes in Beirut…”

Now we know where the Observer/Guardian writer got his “view”.

Posted by: b | May 11 2008 18:49 utc | 9

Clark Hoyt, Public Editor at NYT, reports on what happens when reporters actually try to do their job. He gives two examples arising from use of FOIA, which has become researchers and reporters’ best tool for cracking open government secrets.
FOIA has always been a cat-and-mouse game, between investigators and government. As in all things, the present administration seems to recognize no bounds in playing just beyond the farthest limits of the law.
The two news stories, arriving belatedly: 66 deaths of immigration prisoners, and the close relationship between the Pentagon and retired military who serve as media consultants and commenters.
Curiously, no mention of Hoyt’s report appears anywhere on the lengthy NYT Home page. Appears on the editorial page of the paper edition. Will anyone who does not read the paper edition even notice it?

The Times… took the Pentagon to court last fall. Under the supervision of a federal district judge, Richard J. Sullivan, The Times and an assistant United States attorney representing the Pentagon agreed to deadlines for producing the records Barstow wanted. The Pentagon kept missing the deadlines.
At a hearing in February, Sullivan said the Pentagon was playing “cute” and refused to give any more extensions. “Two years is a long time,” he said. But in April, the parties were back in his courtroom, with the Pentagon pleading for more time. Sullivan was having none of it. “My orders have been issued since November,” he said. “I am not used to having to do this five or six times.” The judge threatened to bring Pentagon officials into court “to explain the delay and why they shouldn’t be held in contempt.”

And when Congress actually tries to help enable FOIA requests, the Executive crew launches it’s usual end run around the legislation.

Late last year, Congress passed the Open Government Act of 2007, with the intention of forcing better compliance with FOIA and heading off situations like Bernstein’s and Barstow’s. (Full disclosure: I testified in favor of the law as a representative of the Sunshine in Government Initiative, a coalition of 10 news organizations.) President Bush signed it on the last day of the year, but his administration quickly set about trying to dismantle one of its key features, an independent ombudsman who could mediate FOIA disputes before they turn into expensive lawsuits, like the one The Times is still pursuing.
The administration proposed no financing for the new office and tried to move its responsibilities to the Justice Department, which defends agencies trying to withhold information.

Posted by: small coke | May 11 2008 21:40 utc | 10

We are usually told that Hizbullah is the only militia in Lebanon.
Not so:
Lebanon’s Sunni bloc built militia, officials say

The Future movement used a security firm to assemble a private force, officials say. But the fighters were no match for the Shiite group Hezbollah.

For a year, the main Lebanese political faction backed by the United States built a Sunni Muslim militia here under the guise of private security companies, Lebanese security experts and officials said.
The fighters, aligned with Saad Hariri’s Future movement, were trained and armed to counter the heavily armed Shiite Muslim militant group Hezbollah and protect their turf in a potential military confrontation.

Hariri’s deputies have denied his movement was building a militia, though ranking military officials, independent analysts and employees of the security firm, called Secure Plus, say it was doing just that.

Over the last year, Secure Plus went from a small security company to an organization with 3,000 employees and unofficial associates on the payroll, mostly poor Sunnis from the country’s north. Some were armed with pistols and assault rifles.
“We have . . . thousands of young people in plainclothes working with us all over the country,” a company official said before the clashes started.

Secure Plus employees, in beige pants and maroon shirts, were drilled for months in basic military training, including hand-to-hand combat. At least two dozen informal offices were opened in Beirut.
For a monthly salary of at least $350, they served eight hours a day guarding offices, patrolling neighborhoods on motorcycles, communicating via walkie-talkie and remaining on call to defend against threats to Sunni neighborhoods or offices of the Future bloc, employees of the company said. Though the group was officially barred from carrying weapons, many had them anyway. One said he bought guns from Hezbollah.

Posted by: b | May 12 2008 12:48 utc | 11

slime eels everywhere
a reading of the french, english & italian press will tell you – suddenly hezbollah set up a coup & imprisoned the lebanese people
i have not read one paper that gives even a half truthful explanation of either the consequences or of the results
& now that hezbollah have responded reasonably to the hariri/jumblatt provocations – not a word from thos same slime eeels

Posted by: remembereringgiap | May 12 2008 14:26 utc | 12

tho i shouldn’t be the least surprised & tho it is clear also that i am not naturally sympatheric to nasrallah – the fictionalisng of events in lebanon this week really do go beyond the pale
because the slime eels do not want us to remember – they conveniently forget the details of the civil wars in the immediate past, they forget who exactly were the warlords, who those warlords, what bodycount these warlords gathered etc etc
today they fail to mention that the oppossition covers the entire confessional & secular waterfront & it is self evident that hezbollah is going to be given military primacy because of the war they fought in the south & in 2006 against the israelis
it is tiring watching these clowns in their bulletproof vests, their ridiculous hats, & their safari jackets they must buy on block at some miami factory & it is clear with very few exceptions they know nothing at all, & i mean nothing. war to war these clowns go & they dishonour the women & men who risked their lives for something greater than a brandname. the absence of care these clowns exhibit & i don’t care whether its al jazeera in english or cnnbbcetcetc – their ingnorance of everything except the anecdotal is more than surprising
their failure to mention for example the arming of the sunni gangs in the palestinain camp & the military crisis it created & the deep loss to the palestinains of housing are forgotten
syria syria syria
iran iran iran
not a fucking word of the training of militias in jordan
not a fucking word of the us arming militias close to the so called govt
in fact the absence of any takl of the other militias
& forgetting that ipso facto – in 2006 hezbollah was accepted by the lebanese population as a standing army, as the real standing army
again all this is about forgetting, not understanding or importantly to remember
beecause to remember what has passed in lebanon indicts the us & their sullied puppets
at least jumblatt has the honesty to appear shamefaced for his role in this affair

Posted by: r’giap | May 12 2008 16:41 utc | 13