In a clearly partisan article the Observer writes:
In a speech on Friday that triggered the worst violence since the civil war that tore the country apart between 1975 and 1990, Nasrallah pledged to ‘cut the hand’ that touched his fighters’ weapons and rockets, accusing the ruling coalition of being ‘Israelis dressed in suits speaking Arabic’.
So who "triggered" this strife? Was it really Nasrallah? How does that fit with this view further down in the piece:
‘Tackling the airport and telephone system was the first time since the Syrian withdrawal that the government has taken practical measures to deal with the resistance,’ said Patrick Haenni , Beirut-based analyst for the International Crisis Group. ‘This was a paradigm shift by the government and it was met by a paradigm shift by Hizbollah, who said they would never turn their weapons in.’
So who triggered?
And the "worst violence since the civil war"? Somehow the indiscriminent bombing Israel did during its 2006 lost war on Lebanon, with over a 1,000 civilian death, seem to have been much violent and worse than the twenty something dead on all sides in this episode.
But maybe we should just forget about that?