Last week I needed some money to fix a small personal credit crunch. A few $1,000 would have been fine.
So I went to my local Deutsche Bank outlet and asked for a credit. I have a long-term brokerage account with them and planed to use the stocks I hold as collateral.
But the Deutsche Bank clerk said no. He said that the stocks I hold for long-term profits were worth too little given their current market value.
"That’s a stupid view," I rejoined. "I have kept these stocks for nine years by now and I plan to hold them forever, like two more years or so."
"Therefore," I explained, "you can’t judge the stocks value by today’s quotation. You have to look at their historical fair value, not their current price."
The clerk didn’t get it. After an hour of brisk discussion I left without the money I urgently needed.
Stupit me. I gave up to early. I should have talked to the clerk’s boss:
The proposals on “fair value” accounting by the Institute of International Finance, an alliance of 300-plus companies chaired by Josef Ackermann, Deutsche Bank’s chairman, would enable financial companies to cushion the blow of financial crises by valuing illiquid assets using historical, rather than market, prices.
Under the plan, which has been obtained by the Financial Times, banks that decided to keep assets on their balance sheet would also be freed from the requirement to hold them to maturity and would be able to sell them after two years.
So Ackermann agrees with me. Pets.com stocks bought at $11 a share still have their ‘fair value’.
Maybe I should try again?