Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 27, 2008
The Dollar Decline Will Continue

In an short interview with CNBC Prof. Roubini is asked about his expectations on the value of the U.S. dollar.

Roubini says he doesn’t expect much change for now, because the economies of Japan and Europe are slowing down and that will lead to expectations of interest rate cuts in Japan and Europe.

One often sees this argument in the U.S. centric financial media. Last week the Dollar bounced off a record low of $1.60 per Euro to $1.5630. This promptly led to false analysis.

Bloomberg:

"The dollar will continue to rebound," said Benedikt Germanier, an analyst at UBS AG in Stamford, Connecticut. "The Fed has the bulk of its easing behind it, while the ECB has the bulk of its easing ahead of it."

Reuters:

Europe is really not insulated and its economy is beginning to show signs of a slowdown," Meadows, [a market analyst at Tempus Consulting in Washington,] said. "While most people now believe the Fed is about to end its easing cycle, a growing number of investors believe the ECB may have to start cutting rates really soon."

These people are wrong. Sure, differences in interest rates are one reason for Euro preference by investors, leading to a decline of the value of the dollar. It is also correct that the economy in Europe is slowing down. But the European Central Bank will not cut interest rates and any expectation of such is mistaken.

While the Fed’s monetary policy has by law two equal and often competing objectives, maximum employment and stable prices, the ECB has, also by law, a hierarchy of objectives with overriding importance assigned to price stability. U.S. commentators seem not to understand this.

In the current inflationary climate the ECB can not and will not cut rates, while the Fed will likely cut at least another 0.25%. The ECB may well increase its interest rate even in an economic downturn and despite the usual protests from Sarkosy and others.

My expectation at this point is that the dollar slide will pause a while, until a second phase of this recession will hit the markets. Roubini and Pimco’s Mohamed El-Erian also expect a second downturn wave. The later writes:

Economic data in the US have taken a notable turn for the worse.
Most im­portantly, the already weakening employment outlook is being
further undermined by a widely diffused build-up in inventory and
falling profitability.

It is thus too early to declare the end of the turmoil that started
last summer. Instead, during the next few months we may witness a new
phase of dislocations, led this time by the real economy.

So far the downturn has been mostly in the leveraged finance realm. But as soon as the one time and small effect of the debt financed $30 billion economic stimulus checks is vanishes, the real economy will turn down sharply.

70% of U.S. GDP is depending on consumer spending. The very real downturn in spending has still to hit home. The slight uptick in U.S. exports will not cancel that effect. The Fed will then be urged to ease even more, while the ECB will be in raising mood. El-Erian again:

The sharp slowdown in the US real economy will occur in the context of continued global inflationary pressures. As such, the Federal Reserve’s dual objectives – maintaining price stability and solid economic growth – will become increasingly inconsistent and difficult to reconcile. Indeed, if the Fed is again forced to carry the bulk of the burden of the US policy response, it will find itself in the unpleasant and undesirable situation of potentially undermining its inflation-fighting credibility in order to prevent an already bad situation from becoming even worse.

The dollar will thereby fall again after having taken a small pause. To hope that the ECB will intervene and rescue the dollar by lowering rates is mistaken. There will be a lot of harsh words crossing the Atlantic over this, but the laws and facts will not change.

Comments

No shit, Why the U.S. Has Gone Broke
Also see this from the Wall Steet Journal,

The Treasury Department reported Thursday that receipts from corporate income taxes fell 16% to $129 billion in the first half of fiscal 2008, which began Oct. 1. The federal deficit during the period hit an all-time high of $311 billion, and was up 20%

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 27 2008 21:41 utc | 1

Fed Pablum Safe Bet CPI Estimate

Reality Mode Sets In On Real Data
Expect a lot of vitriolic community property divorces for Xmas, 2009,
just before US capital gains and divident tax cuts sunset and revert.
Expect a lot of mail-order H1-B housekeeper requests that next April.
Expect a lot of housekeeper claims of domestic slavery for Xmas, 2010.
Expect a lot of individual Chapter 7 bankrupcy filings that next April.
Expect a lot of destitute ex-wives giving it away on Main Street USA.
Merry Xmas, 2011, you guys!!!

Posted by: Wim Wonder | Apr 27 2008 22:31 utc | 2

Thanks for this post, b, and your analysis and links. This has been my sense too – and have been hoping the ECB will not cut rates despite all the CNBC blathering that they will “have to”. Glad to get your expertise.
Uncle, that Finance-Military Complex article was a stunner. Thanks. God, I wish war-profiteering were a campaign issue.

Posted by: Hamburger | Apr 27 2008 22:46 utc | 3

So good, worth reposting in toto, because the fundamentals are so upside down.
Literally, US stratoliner’s jet engines are firing in reverse, full flaps:
US Housing Crash Continues
Who disagrees that house prices will continue to fall?
Real estate related businesses disagree, because they don’t make money if buyers do not buy. These businesses have a large financial interest in misleading the public about the foolishness of buying a house now.
1. Buyers’ agents get nothing if there is no sale, so they want their clients to buy no matter how bad the deal is, the exact opposite of the buyer’s best interest. Agents take $100 billion each year in commissions from buyers. Agents claim the seller pays the commission, but always fail to mention that the seller gets that money from the buyer. Think about it: who brings the money to the table – the seller or the buyer? All money comes from buyers. No buyer, no money.
If a stock broker were to charge 6% on the sale of stock, he would quickly go out of business. Real estate brokers don’t do much more than stock brokers, so why should you give up nearly two years of your working life earning money to pay a realtor for the few hours they may put into helping you buy or sell a house? 6% of the 30 years it takes to pay off a house is 1.8 years of donating your working time to your realtor.
There are good buyer’s agents who really believe they are helping the buyer, but they’re in denial about their conflict of interests. Author Upton Sinclair had a great explanation for this: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
2. Mortgage brokers take a percentage of the loan, so they want buyers to take out the biggest loan possible. Even worse – mortgage brokers get paid according to how BAD the deal is for the buyer. The worse the deal is (higher interest rate, points, fees, etc) the more the mortgage broker gets!
3. Banks get origination fees and then sell most mortgages, so they do not care about the bankruptcy of borrowers. They will lend way beyond what buyers can afford because they lose nothing if the buyer defaults. Banks sell most loans to the government agencies Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The conversion of low-quality housing debt into “high” quality Fannie Mae debt with the implicit backing of the federal government is the main support for the housing bubble. That is ending as Fannie Mae shrinks.
The other way for banks to dump the risk of loan default has been the Wall Street market for mortgage backed securities. Now that mass foreclosures have eliminated the subprime portion of the loan-resale market, banks are under pressure to increase loan quality.
4. Appraisers are hired by mortgage brokers and banks, so they are going to give the appraisals that mortgage brokers and banks want to see, not the truth. Appraisers that kill a deal by telling the truth do not get called back to do other appraisals.
5. Newspapers earn money from advertising placed by realtors, lenders, and mortgage brokers, so papers are pressured by that money to publish the real estate industry’s unrealistic forecasts, and to avoid the fatal words: “prices are falling”. Instead, we may sometimes hear about “softening” or “easing” prices, which sounds so pleasant. At worst, you may hear about a “housing slump”, but you will never hear the mainstream press talk about a crash in prices.
Worse, realtors have a near-monopoly on sale price information, and newspaper reporters never ask realtors hard questions like “how do we know you’re not lying about those prices?” The result is an endless stream of stories reporting that the National Association of Realtors (NAR) says it’s a good time to buy. Asking the NAR about housing is like walking into a used car dealership and asking the salesman if today would be a good day to buy a car.
6. “Owners” themselves do not want to believe they are going to lose huge amounts of money because the “American Dream” myopia has clouded their vision, [ed. at a time when citizens need to be as focused as Chief Joseph and the Nez Pierce. The governments and financers sole and only goal is to keep you on the reservation of wage slavery.]

Posted by: Full Flaps Ollie | Apr 28 2008 1:24 utc | 4

Vietnam First to Adopt “Maker-Taker” Commodities Rule
Vietnam bans rice speculation, says stocks sufficient
Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:30am IST
HANOI, April 28 (Reuters) – Vietnam has banned rice speculation after a surge in buying over the weekend in southern Vietnam and the government said it has sufficient stock for domestic consumption and exports.
The government “strictly forbides organisations, individuals without function to trade food, from buying paddy and rice for speculation”, it said in a statement issued on Sunday and broadcast nationwide by state-run Voice of Vietnam radio on Monday. (Reporting by Ho Binh Minh; Editing by Tomasz Janowski)

Posted by: Kelly Anderson | Apr 28 2008 3:01 utc | 5

Wheat Fungus Fear in Pakistan
S Raza Hasan
23 April 2008
Concerns over a possible attack of Ug99 on wheat crops in Pakistan is soaring high. But officials in the country have said the globetrotting infectious wheat fungus has not reached croplands there.
“There is no such threat now as harvesting has already begun in Sindh and Punjab provinces. However, if the southern wind changes direction and blows across, it may carry in the fungus, affecting new crops,” says Abdul Majeed Nizamani, member of the farmers union, Sindh Abadgar Association.
On March 5, the un Food and Agriculture Organization said the infection had reached Iran and alerted countries in the east of Iran, including India and Pakistan, to take preventive measures.

Posted by: Kelly Anderson | Apr 28 2008 3:34 utc | 6

THE ALARM BELLS ARE SOUNDING

Violence, even terror, always exists on the periphery of America. These are the means by which empire is consolidated, defended, extended and perpetuated.
We live in a culture of increasing emptiness; there is a vacuum at the heart of our empire. Epidemics of illegal drugs succeed one another, while tens of millions, including children as young as two, need antidepressants to get through the day. A great hunger exists for anesthesia in the face of emotional devastation and loss. Everyone knows that something is missing, that meaning and value are steadily being leached out of daily life, along with its very texture.
“The less people really live – or perhaps more correctly, the more they become aware that they haven’t really lived – the more abrupt and frightening death becomes for them, and the more it appears as a terrible accident.” Theodor Adorno’s observation of decades ago seems even more pertinent today. Exploding jetliners, school shootings and anthrax scares can terrify; meanwhile a much deeper crisis triggers a far more pervasive and fundamental fear.
The empire is global. There is nowhere to go to escape its corrosive barrenness. We live in the most standardized society that has ever existed. It seems the whole world now tends towards a universal sameness. A global unity of alienness, of disorientation and disconnection, destined to resemble a mall or an airport. People now dress alike in every major city in the world. They drink Coca-Cola, and watch many of the same TV shows.
The empire’s landscape of unreality and routinization grows steadily more pathological. Damage to nature and violence to the psyche compete in a postmodern culture of denial, punctuated by eruptions of the homicidal at work, at home, at school. We can expect to hear more and more alarm bells that will wake us altogether. Peaceful slumber is unthinkable.
Who doesn’t know, on some level, where this empire – this civilization – is taking us?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 28 2008 7:52 utc | 7

Asians seem to think so too:

Japan owns more Treasuries than any other nation. After raising their holdings by $9.2 billion to $620.6 billion between March and July 2007, Japanese investors trimmed that stake by $34 billion through February, the Treasury said April 15.

Asian investors outside Japan are also pulling back. Money managers in China, the second-biggest overseas holder of Treasuries, with $486.9 billion, and South Korea say they favor debt in Europe, equities or commodities.

Indirect bidders, a group of investors that includes foreign central banks, bought 29 percent of the $19 billion in five-year notes the Treasury sold April 24, down from 34 percent in March.

Dollar Slide Drives Budget as Japan Shuns Treasuries (Update1)

Posted by: Sam | Apr 28 2008 11:40 utc | 8

@7
It is very clear that there is a uniformization of life in all its aspects, from the suppresion of the Sunday rest to the conflation of work with vacation as facilitated by wireless telephones. Women also dress like men and viceversa and the language slides towards a uniformity of expression like “asshole” “fucking” “shit” to express ideas that require an extensive vocabulary or perhaps they are not ideas at all but merely nebulous feelings of outrage. The uniformity flows from competition that tries to keep profits but requires cutting corners or as in the old days, the money changers would clip off tiny pieces from the edge of gold coins.
If we imagine reality made up of innumerable polygons those that have to compete profitably have to cut corners and when in a universe of polygons corners are cut the end result is an array of circles that may be differentiated by their size, quantity, but exactly alike in their quality. I have used the word profit as if it existed at all for simplicity’s
sake.
The only possible individuality in this world of ours is an interior one: religious, intellectual, literary. If we want to participate in the world we will have to wear the denim of social sameness.

Posted by: jlcg | Apr 28 2008 11:55 utc | 9

Incidentally one of the innumerable talking heads that have been popping up to give their take the economy, the universe and everything of late did have one interesting contention.
That the flight from the dollar has caused spec- sorry investors, (his words not mine) to move into commodities such as cereal and grain when they pull outta the dollar.
This bloke pulled a number of between 20% and 25% of the value of food and other essentials all of which have increased in value by at least 100% in the last year, saying well nearly a quarter of the value is an increase as a result of ‘investors’ not speculators, he said buying into essential commodities as they look for alternatives to the $US that are stable.
If that is true then the world’s problems are going to get worse that even our dire predictions.
The flow across to essential commodities will increase as ‘investors’ report better earnings from investing in food, but any attempt to reverse the flow, indeed any reverse of that investment may be as catastrophic for the hungry and poor as continued speculatory investment is (my words).
Crops as commodities are very different to oil, gold and diamonds, the latter tend to be extracted at a very predictable rate with long lead times (building new mines, drilling new wells) required for marked increases in amounts of resources extracted.
This isn’t true of crops whose prices and productivity go up and down like a whore’s drawers. The recent rise in grain prices has stimulated production on formerly fallow land that had been ‘retired’ after agricultural economies were forced to abolish the tariffs on heavily subsidised imports from amerika and europe. Countries from Haiti to Thailand that had been net grain exporters and whose production dropped drastically following the effects of globalisation, have begun farming again. If the floor drops outta the new prices because ‘investors’ have moved on to the next big thing small holders around the world who have bet their balls and their villages’ wealth on a return to farming will lose their shirts once more. More humans will be driven off the land and into useless anti-human metropolises.
Even worse many small nations will lose yet another slice of economic sovereignty.
Further I’ll stick my neck out with a huge prediction. The chaos that ensues from this evil speculation on what we humans eat could be the disaster monsanto needs to force acceptance of it’s genetically modified monopoly on the world’s food supply.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Apr 28 2008 14:06 utc | 10

Talking to the Predators: You See, Genocide turns out to have a terrible ROI.
— but Chalmers Johnson really does know something about the U.S. military and how damn big it is.

This ideology goes back to the first years of the cold war.
During the late 1940s, the U.S. was haunted by economic anxieties. The great depression of the 1930s had been overcome only by the war production boom of the second world war. With peace and demobilization, there was a pervasive fear that the depression would return. During 1949, alarmed by the Soviet Union’s detonation of an atomic bomb, the looming Communist victory in the Chinese civil war, a domestic recession, and the lowering of the Iron Curtain around the USSR’s European satellites, the U.S. sought to draft basic strategy for the emerging cold war. The result was the militaristic National Security Council Report 68 (NSC-68) drafted under the supervision of Paul Nitze, then head of the Policy Planning Staff in the State Department. Dated 14 April 1950 and signed by President Harry S. Truman on 30 September 1950, it laid out the basic public economic policies that the U.S. pursues to the present day.
In its conclusions, NSC-68 asserted: “One of the most significant lessons of our World War II experience was that the American economy, when it operates at a level approaching full efficiency, can provide enormous resources for purposes other than civilian consumption while simultaneously providing a high standard of living.”
With this understanding, U.S. strategists began to build up a massive munitions industry, both to counter the military might of the Soviet Union (which they consistently overstated) and also to maintain full employment, as well as ward off a possible return of the depression. The result was that, under Pentagon leadership, entire new industries were created to manufacture large aircraft, nuclear-powered submarines, nuclear warheads, intercontinental ballistic missiles, and surveillance and communications satellites. This led to what President Eisenhower warned against in his farewell address of 6 February 1961: “The conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience” — the military-industrial complex.
By 1990 the value of the weapons, equipment and factories devoted to the Department of Defense was 83% of the value of all plants and equipment in U.S. manufacturing.

83% of U.S. ability to make things!
1 in 6 of the things that U.S. workers use to manufacture are not designed to make people kill people. What is the percentage now after 18 years of shipping consumer manufacture overseas?
The livelihoods of an entire population are dependent on genocide! I realize that we are not on the moral relativism thread here, but I would say this shows pretty damn well that the choices we have to make are not cultural, but political and economic.
The field of culture does not contain the choices necessary to find sanity. Just a finger pointing at pleasure as the antithesis of this political economy.

Posted by: citizen | Apr 28 2008 15:47 utc | 11

WSJ: Load Up the Pantry?

Load Up the Pantry
April 21, 2008 6:47 p.m.
I don’t want to alarm anybody, but maybe it’s time for Americans to start stockpiling food. >i>No, this is not a drill.
You’ve seen the TV footage of food riots in parts of the developing world. Yes, they’re a long way away from the U.S. But most foodstuffs operate in a global market. When the cost of wheat soars in Asia, it will do the same here.
Reality: Food prices are already rising here much faster than the returns you are likely to get from keeping your money in a bank or money-market fund. And there are very good reasons to believe prices on the shelves are about to start rising a lot faster.
“Load up the pantry,” says Manu Daftary, one of Wall Street’s top investors and the manager of the Quaker Strategic Growth mutual fund.
“I think prices are going higher. People are too complacent. They think it isn’t going to happen here. But I don’t know how the food companies can absorb higher costs.” (Full disclosure: I am an investor in Quaker Strategic)
Stocking up on food may not replace your long-term investments, but it may make a sensible home for some of your shorter-term cash. Do the math. If you keep your standby cash in a money-market fund you’ll be lucky to get a 2.5% interest rate. Even the best one-year certificate of deposit you can find is only going to pay you about 4.1%, according to Bankrate.com. And those yields are before tax.

What about us poor folk, whom can afford to load up? “everything happens for a reason, my friends say”, Praise Jesus!

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 28 2008 16:10 utc | 12

I have been wondering when the U.S. economy would begin to feel the shock effects of the food price run-up. Despite some alarmist stories about Costco and similar stores limiting bulk purchases, I don’t see the dramatic price increases I’m hearing about in poor countries happening in supermarkets and fast food places here. Since so much of what these places sell is overprocessed, manipulated, un-nutritious junk, it might, perversely, be partially positive in the U.S. if and when the price shock hits. Maybe people will have to resort to more unprocessed food that they actually cook themselves, and eat less in general.

Posted by: Maxcrat | Apr 28 2008 17:08 utc | 13

The Dollar used to possess a certain intrinsic value as a safe, stable currency. But they started spreading it around to indiscriminately and the euro has also started to move in as a safe and stable alternative.
But when bags of rice start to overtake the US Dollar as a viable investment option, then we are really going the way of the USSR.

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 28 2008 17:16 utc | 14

The Dollar used to possess a certain intrinsic value as a safe, stable currency. But they started spreading it around to indiscriminately and the euro has also started to move in as a safe and stable alternative.
But when bags of rice start to overtake the US Dollar as a viable investment option, then we are really going the way of the USSR.

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 28 2008 17:16 utc | 15

@14,15
“But when bags of rye start to overtake the US Notgeld dollar as a viable
investment option, then we are really going the way of the Weimar Republic.”

Invest in MacDonald’s, as the CPUE of obtaining groceries is increasing in both
fuel and distance, as smaller inner city grocery stores succumb to shoplifters.
Wendy’s is already gone. What else, Taco Time? Now there’s apt simile for you!
Along with inner city groceries will go the small farmers, when the rollback on
biofuels tax subsidies is streamed to “Defend America” over global food riots.
Perverse outside observers might say, it’s almost like Neo-Zi’s planned this,
which lends credence to belief that reality is a zero sum of collective fantasy,
and the predominant fantasy meme in America is Grand Theft Auto IV, with 83% of
production to “defense”, and 56% of employment by or for government tax welfare.
We got what we paid for!
300 skidoo!

Posted by: Terrence Michaels | Apr 29 2008 5:03 utc | 16

TM,
that was me you were paraphrasing, btw, forgot to put my tag on it.
Investing in McDonalds is investing in manufacturing – ever since Bush declared that producing a hamburger is a “manufacturing sector” job.
I guess that means that working as a breakfast fry-cook at Denny’s qualifies as a position in “high-tech engineering”.
I figured that the biofuels bandwagon was being pushed because it would cut our dependency on imports without forcing us to undertake the unpleasant task of cutting consumption, but yes, the corner-the-market aspect must’ve been what made it so much more attractive.

Posted by: talphieboy | Apr 29 2008 8:34 utc | 17

check out http://backyourdollar.com it has a lot of good info regarding the decline of the dollar, and options to buy gold and silver. even gives you a free gram of gold to get started trading. check it out… http://backyourdollar.com
Best,
John

Posted by: John | May 9 2008 21:52 utc | 18