|
She can not run against the “activist base”
Hillary Clinton just shot herself out of the race by repeating Karl Rove’s false talking point about MoveOn.org.
If she is too elite or bitter to endorse the "activist base of the Democratic Party," she will not get their vote. That settles the electibility argument she tries to make to the superdelegates.
The Pennsylvanian primaries, three days from now, seemed to trend in her direction. This will likely turn that around. A loss or only narrow win there will be another point against her electibility.
Meanwhile Obama managed to get over 30,000 people to a rally in Philadelphia.
Impressive …
Just a bit OT, but part of the larger HLC dialogue, and **now it must be said**!
There is STRONG word-manipulation going on, since, “it depends on what ‘is’, is.”
Probably the most despicable in pol-speak, is their use of 3rd-person passivation.
I’ll give you an example:
“Allied warplanes bombed an undisclosed location shielding radical terrorists”
First of all, “warplanes” don’t “bomb” anything. They are passive. Deus ex machina.
Pilots acting under orders from their superiors release their weapons when told to,
and they and their superiors are there because corporate interests put them there.
Put them there to murder indigents for their land and natural resources. Truth!
Second, that “location” is not some arbitrary X-Y coordinate in cyber space. It’s
a sleeping rural village where the loudest sound is a goat bleating, or a clay pot
being filled by the well, maybe high overhead, a thin white noise of jet contrails.
That village is not just an S-V-O. It’s a collective of living breathing humans
of all age-groups, an elderly father who fought against the Russians, an older son
who fought with the Northern Alliance, younger sons playing up in the hills, some
with only one leg from stepping on a land mine, wives, infants, goats. Truth!
The “radical terrorists” is the worst diversion though. After passivating their
deliberately murderous actions into an anti-liability, anti-criminal 3rd person,
Neo-Zi’s need to punch it up, to make it appear to be 1st person and real. Fear.
Look around, deliberate 3rd person passivation is their pheromone, predominate
pol meme in use. You can smell karl rove from afar, like stink on shyte. Truth!
So:
Ethanol’s a Big Scam, and Bush Has Fallen for It!
First part, correct, but let’s look at it how the pols’s have spun it.
Second part is the big fraud. Honestly, someone needs to address these
commonly used easy debate tactics! This is classic con-artist language!!
“Look, nothing up my sleeve (diversion), here’s a quarter in your ear (fraud)”
The setup. Standard debate tactic, go over the top on “ethanol’s a scam”,
that’s called the, “straw man” gambit. Another term is a, “red herring”.
There exist legitimate arguments that corn ethanol is a net BTU loser
compared to gasoline, (and never mind the overweening criminality of food
commodity diversion as 3W crime against humanity deliberate genocide.)
Ignore all those arguments. Go over the top with “it’s a scam!”, giving
a voice to your opponents, but defining them as RADICALS in that revoicing.
Never say, oh, “scientific analysis shows ethanol may not be a “green” fuel
after all”, say instead, “aliens made me drink ethanol!” Something wack.
Now you’ve polarized your audience, before they’ve even thought to think.
55% of American’s will drift right when polarized, because 55% of Americans
work for government, or as government contractors, and are trained to.
That’s the setup. Nothing up my sleeve. Programming attention, in other words.
“Bush has fallen for it” is the quarter in your ear. Saying, “fallen for it” reinforces the 9/11 Republican meme. Circle the wagons. But most importantly,
there’s that 3rd-person passivation again. Somehow a force larger than Bush,
some mysterious straw man dubbed Corn Conspiracy, arose out of pocket lint and
spider webs, and good golly gosh almighty, our poor, “Bush has fallen for it”!!
Brer Bear-ization. Uncle Remus classic, Newt Gingrich worked with magic.
What do you get out of this, (without having once thought for a microsecond?)
1) Those who say corn ethanol is negative BTU are radicals (“it’s a scam”)
2) George Bush is just an all right guy, trying to do good (“fell for it”)
In other words, awe shucks, fool me oncet, laugh it off as a joke.
BUSH CREATED CORN ETHANOL! CHENEY SPUN IT UP IN HIS ENERGY POLICY ACT!
BIG OIL AND BIG AGRA IS 100% BEHIND THIS. BANKS, BROKERS AND COMMODITY
TRADERS, FARM EQUIPMENT AND AG LAND AGENTS ARE LAPPING THIS UP, BIGTIME.
THIS IS THE GREATEST DIVERSION OF PUBLIC DOLLARS INTO PRIVATE COFFERS
IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE HUMAN WORLD. F**K THE QUARTER IN THE EAR!
PUT THESE SLEIGHT OF HAND CON ARTISTS IN PRISON, AND THROW AWAY THE KEY!!
(I feel better now.)
We will win by sheer force of truth, like pressing the devil to death with stones.
Read through their spin. Learn debate tactics. Dissect their diversions, and just
keep piling on those stones of truth, clearly, succinctly, without punching it up
or sales gimmicks. Crush these Neo-Zi’s under a mountain of tiny pebbles of truth.
Then climb that mountain and plant humanity’s flag on top.
[Back to b’s TP’s: I went to high school with Hillary. She’s GWB in a pants suit.
She’s that R/E broker who sold you a resetting ARM in 2005, ‘Such a deal you got!’
She’s QVC Shopping Channel. She’s melamine in your pet food. Hillary Mequiladora.]
Tiny pebbles of truth.
Posted by: Helen van DeCamp | Apr 19 2008 17:34 utc | 5
|
