Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 17, 2008
“Iraqi security forces can take over …”

U.S. sees Iraqis in control in Baghdad in a year, April 17, 2008
U.S. forces in Baghdad hope to turn over responsibility for security in most of the Iraqi capital to Iraqi forces in about a year, the chief of staff of the American military in the city said.

The remarks by Colonel Allen Batschelet describe a smaller role for the U.S. military in Baghdad after the next U.S. president takes over from George W. Bush in January.

"We anticipate transitioning the majority of Baghdad city into a tactical overwatch by the time of our division’s departure in early spring (2009). We believe that is attainable," Batschelet wrote in an e-mail interview with Reuters.

Wait a second. Haven’t I read such before? Let’s see:

Iraq PM says security forces can take over from U.S., Jul 15, 2007
Iraq will be ready to take over security from U.S. forces "any time" they decide to withdraw, although its police and army still need more training, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said in remarks over the weekend

"We say with full confidence we are able, God willing, to shoulder the complete responsibility in administering the security portfolio if the international forces withdrew, at any time they wish," he said.

PM Al-Maliki: Iraqi Forces Could Take Over Security in ’07, December 01, 2006
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said Thursday he believed Iraqi forces would be ready by June 2007 to take full control of security in Iraq, an issue on which he pressed President Bush during their meeting in Amman, Jordan.

"I can say that Iraqi forces will be ready, fully ready to receive this command and to command its own forces, and I can tell you that by next June our forces will be ready," al-Maliki said in an interview with ABC News.

Top U.S. general: Iraqis can take over security within 18 months, August 30, 2006
The top U.S. commander in Iraq expressed optimism Wednesday that Iraqi forces are making enough progress to provide their own security within 18 months.

Gen. George Casey said Iraqi troops were on course to take over security control from U.S.-led coalition forces, a move that would bring the foreign forces a step closer to withdrawal from the country.

"I don’t have a date, but I can see over the next 12 to 18 months, the Iraqi security forces progressing to a point where they can take on the security responsibilities for the country, with very little coalition support," he said.

Iraq president upbeat on security,   August 2, 2006
Iraqi forces will take over the security of the entire country from US-led forces by the end of the year, President Jalal Talabani says.

"Iraqi security forces will gradually take security responsibility by the end of this year for all the provinces of Iraq," he told a news conference.

Iraq ‘can take over in 18 months’, February 2, 2005
Iraq’s security forces could be ready to take over fully from foreign troops within 18 months, the country’s interior minister has said.

Falah al-Naqib said he was "confident" that Iraq would be able to handle its own security in that timeframe


"I think our security forces will be ready to take care of the security of the country within 18 months," he told the BBC during an interview at the interior ministry in Baghdad.

Maybe I am bit too pessimistic and the Iraqis really will take over from the U.S. occupation. The police at least starts to look really serious now.

Comments

The Colonel could have only been referring to a post election Iraq, whereby the JAM has won elections and political control over the current government alliance, and has asked politely for the U.S. occupation to kindly leave Iraq. Then sure, the U.S. presence will have become infintesmally smaller, with the Iraqi’s in total control of their own security.
On a more serious note, I wonder if anybody has pondered this very real possibility – if the Maliki/Badr were to be swept out of power next fall, would their supposedly official state/non-militia infested Iraqi Army dissolve back into “criminal/illegal militia” status, or would they soldier on with neutrality at the behest of a new (Sadrist) civilian authority?….Right. So instead or until, the latest round of “civil war” is a go.

Posted by: anna missed | Apr 17 2008 17:27 utc | 1

Remember “Vietnamization”? Right up there alongside “Peace with Honor”…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnamization#Vietnamization.2C_1969.E2.80.931974

Posted by: ralphieboy | Apr 17 2008 17:38 utc | 2

it is, in brief, a sordid fucking joke

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 17 2008 18:06 utc | 3

The U.S. has spent the last 5 years trying to replicate the Iraqi Army that they disbanded 5 years ago, to no avail. As I understand it, it was a secular army roughly proportional to the ethnic makeup of the country, albeit with minority (Sunni) control of the higher ranks. Since then, and because of their ethnic divide&conquer strategy of controlling the country, they have been unable to (and will continue to be unable) to field an army divorced from sectarian interests they have amplified in order to control the country. Its impossible to have an army that is independent of overt sectarian influence, when the political structure (&constitution) is predicated along ethnic and sectarian lines. This has naturally doomed Iraq to one party rule and or perpetual civil war, since the military is politicized to the behest of whatever party is in control. It’s just one more example of how the U.S. has through its actions, has discredited and voided its more fanciful justifications for continued occupation.

Posted by: anna missed | Apr 17 2008 18:16 utc | 4

Since any real Iraqi patriot detests anyone connected with us, our puppets will never succeed. Only with our withdraw will they succeed in putting their country back together. If that means they want to continue to kill each other, so be it. We had our revolution, let them have theirs.

Posted by: Ben | Apr 17 2008 18:34 utc | 5

Wait, let me think… OK, let’s bring in NATO!
Iraqi PM asks Nato for military training and development project

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki asked the Nato for a bigger role in training his country security forces and helping in reconstructing the violence-ravaged state infrastructures, PM office statement said on Thursday.
(snip)

Joking aside, NATO could teach the puppets a thing or two about how to keep a murderous militia force behind an oh so legitimate and democratic façade.

Posted by: Alamet | Apr 17 2008 23:06 utc | 6

Pepe Escobar:
My militia is more untouchable than yours

Posted by: Alamet | Apr 17 2008 23:09 utc | 7

Congrats B: you have caught the essence of Billmon in your post. We live in a time warp of the absurd. Prosperity is just around the corner too!

Posted by: Diogenes | Apr 18 2008 3:39 utc | 8

Don’t worry Madame Torturer is coming to the rescue:

Rice, set to attend a conference of Iraq’s neighbors in Kuwait on Tuesday, said her message would be for Arab states to fulfill their promises to increase diplomatic, economic, social and cultural ties with Baghdad’s government.

After all the Arabs must save Iraq from the evil Iranian influence:

“What they need to do is confirm and work for Iraq’s Arab identity,” she said. “That in and of itself will begin to shield (Iraq) from influences of Iran that are nefarious influences,” Rice said at a news conference.

Oh wait the US is supporting the evil Iranian influence in the Iraqi governemnt:

“She will have a very difficult time with the Gulf states in convincing them that the Maliki government is anything other than the cat’s paw of the Iranians,” said Riedel, now with the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution in Washington.

Diffucult he says, I would say it is pretty much impossible.
Rice has a dream
Check out the evil sneering look on the pic of her face they use in the article. How appropriate, I sometimes wonder if they ever realize how stupid they sound on the WOrld stage outside the American bubble?

Posted by: Sam | Apr 18 2008 4:06 utc | 9

U.S. Begins Erecting Wall in Sadr City

Trying to stem the infiltration of militia fighters, American forces have begun to build a massive concrete wall that will partition Sadr City, the densely populated Shiite neighborhood in the Iraqi capital.
The construction, which began Tuesday night, is intended to turn the southern quarter of Sadr City near the international Green Zone into a protected enclave, secured by Iraqi and American forces, where the Iraqi government can undertake reconstruction efforts.

The team building the barrier was protected by M-1 tanks, Stryker vehicles and Apache attack helicopters. As the workers labored in silence, there was a burst of fire as an M-1 tank blasted its main gun at a small group of fighters to the west. An Apache helicopter fired a Hellfire missile at a militia team equipped with rocket-propelled grenades, again interrupting the night with a thunderous boom. A cloud of dark smoke was visible in the distance through the Stryker’s night-vision system.

Posted by: b | Apr 18 2008 5:36 utc | 10

Opus Dei:
from Salon magazine

Posted by: ralphieboy | Apr 18 2008 7:11 utc | 11

Yeah their walling off all the Baghdad neighborhoods these days. It’s the latest rage in downtown Baghdad. It’s the New World Order, creating reservations out of each of the Iraqihoods. It’s easier to pick off them young guys from the air. Just pen them in and pick them off with drones armed with hellfires from a comfortable distance. Now the Americans got there own little Gaza just like the Israelis. Just keep blowing them up from the sky and watch those little kids die. They should make it into a reality TV show so we can get to watch too. Let the whole World share in the gore.

Posted by: Sam | Apr 18 2008 8:11 utc | 12

Bill Lind on the war against Sadr. As usual, spot on. While the delusional alchemists in Washington continue on with their futile experiments Ad infinitum. Gaza indeed.

Posted by: anna missed | Apr 18 2008 8:48 utc | 13

Another company of the Iraqi army thinks its better to go home:
Company of Iraqi troops abandons position after attack

A company of government troops in Sadr City retreated when they came under attack from Shiite militiamen who used the cover of a sandstorm, police said Friday.
The clashes overnight killed two people and injured nine, a police commander said. The officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to release the information, said it was unclear whether there were any casualties among the soldiers.

The police officer said militiamen belonging to the Mahdi Army of anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr launched their attack shortly before midnight on army positions in Sadr City, a sprawling slum area of some 2.5 million people in eastern Baghdad.
The company responsible for that section withdrew, abandoning their positions, including their command post in al-Nasir police station, he said.

Posted by: b | Apr 18 2008 13:53 utc | 14

Father of a fallen soldier:

Keith Maupin, father of the Union Township soldier whose remains were found in Iraq last month, said the Army has a list of six to eight Iraqis who are thought to have been involved in his son’s kidnapping.

Questions the reason’s for his son’s death:

“They’re terrorists, bottom line … You show me in any religion where it’s OK to kill an innocent person,” he said. “That makes them murderers in my book.”

Here’s another question. You show me in any religion where it’s OK to invade other countries that never attacked yours.
And wants to personally ask the Iraqis why they killed him:

“I wanted to ask these guys in custody … I just wanted to know why they killed him. They didn’t have to do that,” he said. “They didn’t gain anything.”
Army officials told him the question would be asked of the two Iraqis in custody, he said.

I’m sure those Iraqis would want to ask him why you invaded. You didn’t have to do that. You didn’t gain anything.
Two suspects in custody, other Iraqis are sought
I don’t know what to tell a grieving father but I know this. If Arabs invaded my country I would want to kill every last one of them. I don’t believe for a minute that he wouldn’t want to kill them too. How can anybody not understand this?

Posted by: Sam | Apr 18 2008 15:15 utc | 15

ralphieboy, good one. you should post that on the pharma thread.
penguins don’t have nipples!
sam, your link..they provide some 101
Iraq is an Arab nation while Iran’s roots are Persian. Both countries, however, have majority Shi’ite populations.
“What they need to do is confirm and work for Iraq’s Arab identity,” she said.

all except the most powerful leader representing shia arabs i suppose. how exactly is she planning on ‘confirming’ arabs? or ‘working for their identity’? maybe she should come home and ‘confirm’ black people and ‘work for their identity’. she could start by offing herself.
really, i can’t stand all this racist crap. ‘working for an arab identity’. what crap. after empowering iraqis w/persian roots as their primo puppets.
i wonder what middle easterners think of this kind of lingo? what exactly does that mean????? maybe she should be lecturing the anti muslim islamofascist hate speech zionist crowd if she wants to ‘confirm’ arabs..

Posted by: annie | Apr 18 2008 15:41 utc | 16

VOI
At least 300 individuals were killed and 1621injured during the clashes that erupted in the Shiite slum of Sadr city over the last three weeks, a Medic source said on Thursday.

Posted by: annie | Apr 18 2008 17:50 utc | 17

Friday news dump*…
Pentagon institute calls Iraq war ‘a major debacle’
“A major debacle,” huh? I guess that’s one euphemism for crimes against humanity.
*I guess this fuck does appreciate the Radio/Television Correspondents…
Be sure to catch part 2 too.
Yeah I laughed, it was humorous; he has that luxury, I guess.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 19 2008 9:56 utc | 18

Pay special attention to his message at about 7:29 wrt media as pertaining to my post above…
Also, anyone else feel the ol’ Aesopian routine creeping in, in some of that?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 19 2008 10:03 utc | 19

“So we asked the author, Joseph Collins, to provide some context…”:
Now, all this has me wondering who Jeb pissed off down in flo rida…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 19 2008 10:15 utc | 20