Because you will not read it in the "western" media without heavy obfuscation and bias we reproduce the original:
Latest Iran Safeguards Report Delivered to IAEA Board, 23 February 2008
After the report was circulated, Dr. ElBaradei made the following comments:
"Our task in Iran is to make sure that the Iranian nuclear programme is exclusively for peaceful purposes. We are at it for the last five years. In the last four months, in particular, we have made quite good progress in clarifying the outstanding issues that had to do with Iran´s past nuclear activities, with the exception of one issue, and that is the alleged weaponization studies1 that supposedly Iran has conducted in the past. We have managed to clarify all the remaining outstanding issues, including the most important issue, which is the scope and nature of Iran´s enrichment programme.
…
We need Iran to implement the Additional Protocol2. We need to have that authority as a matter of law. That, I think, is a key for us to start being able to build progress in providing assurance that Iran´s past and current programmes are exclusively for peaceful purposes. So we have the Protocol issue and we have the weaponization, alleged weaponization studies. I should however add that in connection with the weaponization studies, we have not seen any indication that these studies were linked to nuclear material.
(Emphazis and notes added by b)
1The "alleged weaponization studies" are unproven accusations based on U.S. intelligence, reportedly from the Niger papers Laptop of Death and given to the IAEA only two weeks ago. They do not refer to anything nuclear.
2Iran had voluntarily signed, but not ratified, the additional protocol of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Following the IAEA Board decision, in a rare non-consentual vote, to report Iran’s file to the UN Security Council, Iran informed the IAEA that it would suspend voluntary adherence to the additional protocol.