Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 22, 2008
Turkey Invades Iraq

Turkey just launched a large scale invasion of north Iraq:

Turkey’s military said the land offensive — the first major incursion in a decade — had fighter aircraft in support. Turkish TV said up to 10,000 troops had entered Iraq.

The operation was prepared with aerial bombing and artillery attacks on PKK position throughout the last days. PKK is a Kurdish rebel group fighting for autonomy in south-east Turkey.

The PKK operates unhindered in the Qandeel (Kandil) mountain range in north east Iraq:

No
Iraqi troops patrol here. PKK men in uniform check the IDs of those who
seek to visit. The image of the PKK’s leader is emblazoned on a
mountain slope, and a sign openly proclaims PKK headquarters. The
peshmerga troops of the Kurdistan Regional Government, which officially
rules northern Iraq, make no effort to enter.

During spring the PKK fighters used to come down from their snowy winter
Iraqi mountain retreats and slip across the border into Turkey.

A Turkish offense was expected to start in mid March. The idea for the
preemptive move now seems to be to cut off the PKK from its logistic
lines, to isolate them and to fight them on there own turf when the snow
recedes.

The invasion could easily expand into an open battle between Turkey and the Iraqi-Kurdish peshmerga.

There already was a standoff yesterday between Turkish troops stationed in observer posts in north Iraq and peshmerga units. The Turkish troops tried to take control of two roads in preperation of todays invasion.

Kurdish soldiers from the peshmerga militia, which is loyal to the Kurdish Regional Government, moved to stop them. For an hour and a half, the two sides faced off before the Turkish soldiers retreated to their base, which is about 27 miles northeast of the city of Dohuk. The peshmerga surrounded the base and remained there late Thursday.

The U.S. supports Turkey as well as the Kurdish Regional Government in Iraq. One wonders how Washington will react when both seriously start to fight each other. The Kurdish Regional government will demand support from Baghdad against the Turks. If such is not provided, the  Kurdish parties could stop any cooperation and Maliki’s government would fall.

The Turkish government says the operation will take as long as nessessary, which could of course be days or years. It also pledged not to hurt civilians and not to confront Iraqi-Kurdish Peshmerga forces. 

It will be impossible to keep these promises as the PKK fighters are not distinguishable from the general population and have wide support and sympathy from their Iraqi-Kurdish brethren and the peshmerga.

It is therefore likely that this conflict will escalate.

Comments

Waiting fro the surge to end?
Muqtada al-Sadr extends Iraqi cease-fire

Anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr announced Friday that he has extended a cease-fire order to his Shiite Mahdi Army by another six months, giving Iraq a chance to continue its fragile recovery from brutal sectarian violence.

Can someone explain what is “anti-US” with Sadr when he agrees with the majority of the US public and wants the occupation to end?

Posted by: b | Feb 22 2008 14:20 utc | 1

al-Sadr must always be preceded by “anti-US” or “radical cleric” in the western media. that’s the rules and the stenographers duly follow them.

Posted by: ran | Feb 22 2008 14:45 utc | 2

Or just waiting for US troops to be caught in the middle of the coming mess in the North, when all-out war will erupt between Turkish and Kurdish soldiers? After all, if he’s keeping a neutral position when the Turks, Kurds Sunnis and some Shia militias begin the shootout, with US troops here and there panicking, he can choose to move and attack when he wants, where he wants, who he wants.

Posted by: CluelessJoe | Feb 22 2008 15:42 utc | 3

This invasion was forecast before the 2003 invasion by the Canadian Spectator ACLU

Kurdish nationalists have long experience with betrayals and alliances of convenience, and have first hand experience of American perfidy. After an invasion, they will defend themselves from Turkish incursions. They will not lose the autonomy they have gained over the last eleven years in Northern Iraq. This not only puts them at odds with US ally Turkey, it may also put them at odds with the US itself, even with US wishes that they participate in indigenous actions against Iraqi forces. A complication of post-invasion Iraq will likely be the demand that US commanders disarm the Kurds.
Northern Iraq could easily become contested, terrain involving partisan warfare between Turks, Kurds of three factions, the Iranians, and the US, with Syrians based groups also throwing in their three pennorth. This would amount to the devolution of Northern Iraq, a key strategic region, into another Afghanistan or Somalia.

Turkey is of course a NATO member and was very swift to agree to the “Independence ” of Kosovo, along with fellow members of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), Albania and Afghanistan.
The United States (advised before the push) described the invasion as “not the greatest news.” “A land operation is a whole new level,” Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Matthew Bryza told reporters in Brussels.
It is difficult to believe that the US military are anxious to intercede between the peshmurga and the Turkish Air Force.
The blue touch paper has been lit… now is the time to retire to a safe distance.

Posted by: Edward Stroudley | Feb 22 2008 20:02 utc | 4

I was interested by the description of the Kurds as surrounding a Turkish base northeast of Dohuk, and inside Iraq. I wonder whether the Turkish invasion is not in fact an operation to relieve this surrounded base, which could be isolated, and in danger of falling. One would have thought in the modern day that, like US bases isolated in Vietnam, it could be supplied endlessly by air, at least by helicopter, or even evacuated by helicopter. But maybe not. It could be in the valley, and the Kurds on the heights in the mountainous terrain, interdicting the landing ground. The model of Dienbienphu. The Turks could be in difficulty, rather than conquering the Kurds, as the affair is presented.

Posted by: Alex | Feb 22 2008 20:39 utc | 5

The Turks are just there to spread some more democracy. Not to mention issuing some no-bid, cost-plus reconstruction contracts. I wonder if they will be taking any dogs back home with them.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Feb 23 2008 7:37 utc | 6

thanks Alex for pointing out what is certainly not obvious from corporate media. This bit from Turkey leads one to believe there is some kind of standoff which could go south though I believe cooler heads will prevail.

Posted by: dan of steele | Feb 23 2008 8:45 utc | 7

@Alex – possible, yes, but the bombing campaign the Turks do points to something else.
McClatchy: Iraqi Kurds ready to confront Turkish troops

Iraqi Kurdish officials on Friday ordered 6,000 Kurdish militiamen to take up new positions in Iraq’s Dohuk province as hundreds of Turkish troops crossed the border in what Turkey said was an attack on Kurdish rebels who’d sought shelter there.

Still, the makeup of the forces suggested that Kurdish Regional President Massoud Barzani probably approved the deployment: More than 4,000 of the Kurdish forces belong to the Zeravany, the military wing of Barzani’s Kurdistan Democratic Party. The remaining 2,000 are members of Iraqi Kurdistan’s peshmerga militia, the regional government’s armed force.

Friday’s incursion came after a Turkish aerial and artillery bombardment on Kurdish targets that destroyed at least five bridges and one day after peshmerga forces confronted Turkish troops who’d moved to seize two highways in Dohuk in tanks and armed personnel carriers. The peshmerga forced the Turks to return to one of the five bases that Turkey has maintained in Iraq since 1997 and then surrounded the base. Peshmerga commanders told the Turks that they would open fire if the Turks attempted to move off the base.
On Friday, 4,000 people demonstrated in front of the base, demanding that about 1,000 Turkish soldiers stationed in Iraq leave, according to a statement from the Kurdistan Democratic Party.

I doubt the “rescue” scenario because it were those Turkish troops based in Iraq who started the scation by taking controll of two highway roads. Also the bombing of 5! bridges is something that doesn’t fit any rescue operation.
Another issue that is playing here is a Turkish attempt to split Barzani’s and Talabani’s organisation from each other (not difficult – they were fighting each other bitterly in the late 90s). While the Turks don’t talk with Barzani they invited Talabani to Ankara.

Posted by: b | Feb 23 2008 9:06 utc | 8

Dien Bien Phu is not a relavent comaparison. France was half way around the world. Dohuk is virtually on the Turkish Border. This encounter was not of a violent nature. The Turks have lived up to their agreements not to engage the Iraqi-Kurdish Peshmerga forces. The PKK would like nothing better than expanding this conflict and reap benefits from a breakdown in the relations of the US, Turkish and Iraqi/Kurdish forces. The PKK is an outlaw organization, based on terror, drugs and smuggling. They can live in their mountain strongholds if they wanted, but they continually come down into the territory of Turkey, Iran and Syria to impose their self serving dictatorial style on the populations normally occupying the region. Their populations would be welcome back into the fold were they abide by the rule of law, but they have chosen the rule of terror and bloodshed. This in no way can be compared to Vietnam.

Posted by: Kemer5 | Feb 23 2008 9:09 utc | 9

There is also some domestic Turkish politics in play and the invasion was probably started to have the military busy rather than to have it planing a coup over this:
Gül approves reform package to lift scarf ban

President Abdullah Gül yesterday approved a constitutional package that will lift a long-standing ban on headscarves at universities.

The passage of the reform package in Parliament disturbed secular circles, particularly the Republican People’s Party (CHP), which vowed to take the package to the Constitutional Court if it is approved by Gül.

Posted by: b | Feb 23 2008 9:13 utc | 10

When country is USA “friend” (read colony) and has it military bases on it’s soil then it can do stuff like this. Invade other states…If you refuse USA military on your soil your land will be taken and given to others. Simple as that…

Posted by: vbo | Feb 23 2008 14:23 utc | 11

I find it curious that the operation was launched in what is effectively still mid-winter there, with deep snow (because of the bad winter this year). You wouldn’t do that for an operation over which you had a choice of timing, such as an offensive. And the military would refuse for an operation that was essentially political. Something very heavy must have driven them into attacking now. You don’t get anything detailed out of the very brief news reports.
And we’re already into claim and counter-claim about numbers of casualties. First the Kurds say they killed 8 Turks with no Kurdish dead. The Turks feel they need to trump that, so it is 8 dead Turks, and 45 dead Kurds. (sorry didn’t check the figures, but they are approx. correct).

Posted by: Alex | Feb 23 2008 15:27 utc | 12

The correct figures are: Kurds claim 22 Turks dead, and no Kurds. Turks claim 44 Kurds and five Turks (BBC)

Posted by: Alex | Feb 23 2008 15:33 utc | 13

TURKISH GROUND TROOPS DID NOT INVADE IRAQ. IT IS JUST FOR CLEANING THE NORTHERN IRAQ FROM TERRORISTS…..

Posted by: MRTORGAY. | Feb 23 2008 20:24 utc | 14

Kurdish Soldiers in Iraq Caught Between Competing Allegiances

“The Turkish army doesn’t have the right to come into our country. What they are doing is against the law,” Maj. Hussein Jafar, a pesh merga officer, said at the edge of the destroyed Avamarke bridge, a roughly 40-yard span built in 2004 that was blasted by Turkish missiles on Thursday, according to residents and local officials. It was one of five bridges in the border region destroyed in the Turkish bombardments, Kurdish soldiers said.
“They bombed the bridge because they say there are PKK in this area, but actually the PKK are very far from here. They want to destroy the economy of our country,” Jafar said.

“If Turkey comes farther than they are now, then 100 percent we will stop them,” said Maj. Gen. Hashim Sitae, a pesh merga commander in the northern city of Dahuk.

Col. Humaid Muhammed Abdullah, a pesh merga officer in Dahuk. “We are waiting for the Americans to do something to solve this situation.”

Sardar Kakameen, the mayor of Deralouk, a Kurdish town in northern Iraq near the border, said that the bombing campaign in recent months has been the most intense he has seen and that more than 100 villages have emptied out as residents have moved in with relatives in his city and in neighboring areas.
“Because of the bombing, there is nobody left in the area,” he said. “The civilian people are the ones who have suffered the most from this bombing.”
Three days ago, mortar shells began to rain down on the tree farms and apple orchards in Hish, a predominantly Christian village along the border, residents said.
“The bombing came down directly in our area, it was very strong,” said Fual Hoshaba Kashool, 43, a farmer from the village. Kashool and his family, 12 people in all, fled on foot at dawn to the nearby town of Sheladeze. The next day, the Avamarke bridge was destroyed, cutting off the one road to home.

Looks like the Turks are setting up a 15 mile “border security zone” in north Iraq.

Posted by: b | Feb 24 2008 11:37 utc | 15

According to the Turkish General Stuff reported today, 24 February,15:00 pm.: The correct numbers are 15 Turk soldiers dead, and 112 Terrorists.

Posted by: MRTORGAY | Feb 24 2008 14:53 utc | 16

According to the Turkish General Stuff
You believe any General Staff? Grow up.
“The first casualty of War is Truth”

Posted by: b | Feb 24 2008 15:10 utc | 17

looks like Turkey “fights terror” the same way Israel or the US does. via collective punishment and indiscriminate killing and destruction.

Posted by: ran | Feb 24 2008 15:13 utc | 18

A diary at the Agonist by a Turkish liberal explains the historic psychology of the Turks behind this. My Turkish friends tell me similar stuff. I hitchhiked through Turkey and the Turkish-Iraq borderland some years ago and it fits the impression I got.
He gets a bit too excusing towards the US readers in the end, but it gives a good view of what is behind the Turkish mind on this.

Posted by: b | Feb 24 2008 20:18 utc | 19

American are ignorant. Not an insult but truth. First of all, They ar enot kurdish soldiers, they are terrorists.
PKK is counted as a terrorist organization by USa and Europe , yet some intellectual american likes to call them freedom fighters or soldiers!! So Do you think El Qaide members are soldiers too!!??
Turkish Army is a systematic army and the second biggest army of nato. If we wanted we could turn the whole north iraq upside down since we got full control, experience in middle east guerilla fighting techniques.
We know who are pkk members, we know where they hide so that is not a war between 2 countries, it is a country against terrorists!! So stop showing and demonstrating it liek that with your crooked , missing information!
Thanks

Posted by: Hellas | Mar 4 2008 10:48 utc | 20

I find it curious that the operation was launched in what is effectively still mid-winter there, with deep snow (because of the bad winter this year). You wouldn’t do that for an operation over which you had a choice of timing, such as an offensive. And the military would refuse for an operation that was essentially political.
i find it confusing also. especially the fact that it is condoned by the puppet government/US and kurdish politicians. so i ask myself, what are they getting out of it? how much is political trade off?

“My city, Mosul, was safe for those who have no connection with Americans or government intelligence, but now it is not safe for anyone after the explosion at the Zinjilly neighbourhood that was carried out by Peshmerga (Kurdish militias) and Americans to justify the new surge against the city.

surge equals ‘soft partition’.
Top US military official visits Iraq rebel stronghold
next up?
KIRKUK, Iraq (AFP) — Admiral Mike Mullen, head of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, visited the Sunni rebel bastion of Hawijah in central Iraq as part of a tour of the country, US officials said on Monday.
what did the turkish invasion drowned out?

BAGHDAD, Feb. 27 (UPI) — At least 25 Iraqis were killed or injured in separate incidents in Kirkuk and Mosel, security officials reported Wednesday.

are sunnis being cleansed from these areas?
badger

A similar plan is taking shape in Iraq, where yesterday there was convened a conference of GreenZone officials (including Maliki and the minister for planning and economic cooperation, one Ali Baban)with provincial governors and heads of provincial councils.

Maliki called this a pioneering conference and an initial step in the direction of overcoming past problems via economic development. The headline point: This year’s budget includes an amount for provincial development projects that is 90% bigger than the comparable amount in 2006.
The pattern is the same. At a time when the nation is split (Fatah versus Hamas in the Palestinian case; Supreme Council/Kurdish versus Sadrist and Sunnis in the current case), the proposal is to promote “economic development” under the control of the side currently in the West’s favor, in the face of continuing confrontation with the other side. Maliki’s references to “international expertise” and “opening to investment” are meaningful enough as an indication of the proposed role of the free-market community.
As if to drive this point home, these remarks are twinned with press conference remarks by Adel Abdul Mahdi (the Supreme Council’s IMF/World Bank groupie) in which he denied that there was any politics involved in the veto of the provincial-powers law.

something tells me this is some sort of deal wrt an independent kurdish region. there has to be some reason the ptb are allowing this invasion. honestly, if the US was so concerned about ‘terrorists’, why didn’t they deal w/the pkk along time ago, instead of supplying them w/arms?
(sorry, no time to look up the hersh pkk link)
the timing is related to the ‘surge’ in mosel, the coming ‘surge’ in kirkut… all designed to look like ‘AQ’, when really, this is the ‘soft’ partition.
just my guess.

Posted by: annie | Mar 4 2008 15:23 utc | 21

22 turkish doleirs wre killed and 389 terrorists. The thing general stuff says are offical and recorded for the future decleration and claims.
No nato army officers would tell lie about the offical casualities.
Grow up idio!

Posted by: Kevin-JB | Jun 5 2008 21:10 utc | 22