Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 14, 2008
The Space Weapon Threat

BushCheney blow another disarmament treaty. They want to weaponize space.

Remember these headlines from last spring?

Pentagon: China’s anti-satellite test poses threat
U.S., Japan Criticize China for Testing Anti-Satellite Missile
Experts: US Should Worry About Chinese Anti-Satellite Device
Cheney: China’s anti-satellite test ‘not consistent’ with stated goal of a peaceful rise

All these headlines were of course highly hypocritical. The U.S. has tested anti-satellite weapons since the late 1950s and shot down one of its own satellites in 1985. The Soviets had a similar program.

As experts have pointed out, the U.S. missile defense system, especially the parts based on AEGIS cruisers, are useable as anti-satellite weapons.

This is now confirmed. The U.S. plans to shoot down a dead spy-satellite:

U.S. officials said Thursday that the option preferred by the Bush administration will be to fire a missile from a U.S. Navy cruiser, and shoot down the satellite before it enters Earth’s atmosphere.

The satellite in question is a 4.5 tons spy-object that malfunctioned after it was launched in December 2006.

The media will explain that the satellite has to be shoot down so it doesn’t hurt anyone when it eventually returns to earth. The chances for anyone to be hit by satellite debris are zero. The military experts will rumour that this is about the sophisticated image sensor on board of the satellite which could fall into false hands. Again the chances for that are next to zero. The atmospheric reentry temperature is several thousand Kelvin and the satellite was not designed for reentry and to withstand such heat and deceleration.

So this seems to be Cheney’s answer to the recent offer by China and Russia for a treaty to ban arms in space (which includes the ban of anti-satellite measures):

China and Russia will submit a joint proposal next month for an international treaty to ban the deployment of weapons in outer space, a senior Russian arms negotiator said on Friday.

Valery Loshchinin, Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations-sponsored Conference on Disarmament, said the draft treaty would be presented to the 65-member forum on February 12.

The now announced anti-satellite ‘test’ is a loud "FUCK YOU!" towards Russia, China and the UN.

Treaties are for bummers. Real men shoot down satellites – or their hunting companions.

As Donald Mahley, acting U.S. deputy assistant secretary for threat reduction, export controls and negotiations, said:

"Additional binding arms control agreements are simply not a viable tool for enhancing the long-term space security interests of the United States or its allies."

Cut the ‘allies’ part – the U.S. is the only country that opposes such a treaty.

The explanation for such Orwellian excuses is likely an active space based weapon program hidden somewhere in the hundreds of billions of unpublished Pentagon programs.

This makes us all feel safer, doesn’t it?

Comments

Polonium Act I scene iii
“There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your press releases.”

Posted by: biklett | Feb 14 2008 20:17 utc | 1

Maybe not a malfunction, they just need an excuse for the test.

Posted by: Ben | Feb 14 2008 21:29 utc | 2

Closely related,
Gwynne Dyer – The real reason for vast US defence bill

(snip)
Even if you accept the deeply suspect proposition that invading foreign countries is a useful way to fight terrorism, invading the target countries (which generally do not inhabit the higher reaches of the technological pecking order) does not require eleven aircraft carriers and fleets of stealth bombers.
So what is all the rest of the money for? According to Michael Klare, defence correspondent for The Nation, the answer is obvious. “The US military posits its future on the China threat. That is the ultimate justification for a defence budget of US$500 billion a year. There is no other plausible threat.
“If you look at the new budget which came out just this week, it calls for vast spending on new weapons systems that can only reasonably be justified by what they call a ‘peer competitor’, a future superpower that could threaten the United States. Only China conceivably can fill that bill. Not Iran, not Iraq, or some [other] rogue state. Only China fits that bill.”
(snip)

Posted by: Alamet | Feb 14 2008 22:20 utc | 3

Speaking of China…
Scott Horton Interviews John Feffer

February 13th, 2008
John Feffer, co-director of Foreign Policy in Focus, discusses the new arms race in North Asia, Japan’s abandonment of their tradition of non intervention since WWII, “containment” policy toward China, the status of the nuclear deal with the DPRK and the possibilities and obstacles to Korean reunification.

Oh, those RED Chinese, didn’t Nixon deal with them… /snark
Price Shock: Food Inflation in China

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 15 2008 1:11 utc | 4

Are you kidding?
They are more worried about pieces of the damn thing ending up being auctioned off by Texans on eBay 😉
That’s IF it doesn’t implode on re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere.
Ahh..let’s blow it up over the ocean, the U.S. Space Program’s favourite dumping ground..
Deep sea tuna for dinner anyone?

Posted by: From The Perimeter | Feb 15 2008 3:46 utc | 5

DOD spending keeps a lot of universities going. This will cover Engineering, Physics, Astrodymamics, and god knows how many other student persuits, tuition, plus big bucks to their university departments. Its not really about shoting down space debris, just keeping the funding happening.
Its about the only thing USA produces big scale. Too bad GM didn’t get into rockets when the price was right.

Posted by: Allen/Vancouver | Feb 15 2008 4:56 utc | 6

@Allen – I find this “research” argument pretty useless. The same money could be spent on research for productive issues.

Oh the danger

Deputy national security adviser James F. Jeffrey said the decision was based on the fact that the satellite is carrying a substantial amount of hydrazine, a hazardous rocket fuel.
When the pending crash was first announced last month, however, National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe and other officials minimized the danger, saying that the potential for harm was “very small.”

Officials acknowledged yesterday that many satellites and spacecraft parts — some of them much larger — have fallen to Earth in the past without causing harm. But they said the presence of 1,000 pounds of hydrazine — unexpended fuel contained in a 40-inch sphere that was likely to hit the ground intact — led Bush to approve the shoot-down.
The announcement set off an immediate debate on defense blogs and among experts who questioned whether there is an ulterior motive. Some experts said the military is seizing an opportunity to test its controversial missile defense system against a satellite target.
But others noted that the Standard Missile-3 has successfully been tested against warhead targets, which are far smaller than the satellite.
“There has to be another reason behind this,” said Michael Krepon, co-founder of the Henry L. Stimson Center, a liberal arms-control advocacy organization. “In the history of the space age, there has not been a single human being who has been harmed by man-made objects falling from space.”

Hydrazine has a flash point of 38 degree celsius – the tank would never survive reentry …

Posted by: b | Feb 15 2008 7:29 utc | 7

$179B for “other undisclosed national security purposes”. That’s big fuck-it money.
DoD/NSA probably popped VO corks around the world, when Bush pulled off that coup.
Now dot.mil can do anything they fucking feel like doing, and anytime they want to.
It’s 11:30PM and the local mil base is still thumping off ordinance rattling walls.
Don’t complain. The Sound of Freedom (TM). Your $179B revisionary bonus in action.
Bush on Monday proposed a $515.4 billion budget for DoD’s 2009 fiscal year…plus.
By comparison, the Three Gorges Dam, largest civil construction project since the
Great Wall of China, and both visible from space, will cost less than $3B a year.
The largest construction project of the age, only 1/2% of 1% of DoD’s next budget.
Then $179B on top of, for non-line-item undisclosed purposes general fuck-it money.
Enough to shoot off a Peacekeeper ICBM every 5 hours, every day, for all year long.

Posted by: Swift Creek | Feb 15 2008 8:15 utc | 8

You don’t have to be a math geek to understand the following,
One million seconds is 12 days, where as one billion seconds is 32 years. And we throw around these numbers as if there is no difference in amount spent on ‘full spectrum dominance'(TM) VS what non detrimental use?
Are we talking about buying gotterdammerung?
And 2.3 Trillion missing after 911, I wont even mention.
More like the preface/prologue of a new once scene act, entitled, Polonium 210: ‘esprit d’escalier…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 15 2008 9:39 utc | 9

Science does not have a moral dimension. It is like a knife. If you give it to a surgeon or a murderer, each will use it differently.~‘Baron’ von Braun

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 15 2008 10:56 utc | 10

Wernher von Braun (1965): A song written and performed by Tom Lehrer for an episode of NBC’s American version of the BBC TV show That Was The Week That Was; the song was later included in Lehrer’s album That Was The Year That Was. It was a satire on what some saw as von Braun’s cavalier attitude toward the consequences of his work in Nazi Germany: “‘Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? / That’s not my department’, says Wernher von Braun.”
Wernher Magnus Maximilian Freiherr (‘Baron’)[1] von Braun

Posted by: Ghost of saddam Hussein | Feb 15 2008 12:22 utc | 11

Some pretty amazing satellite photo’s here and
here.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 16 2008 2:38 utc | 12

Experts Scoff at Sat Shoot-Down Rationale (Updated)

My real concern is that this is simply a knee-jerk reaction made by the Administration in response to the purported threat by the Chinese. Since the April 2007 ASAT [anti-satellite] test, there have been rumors and whispers going around that the Administration and like-minded individuals are looking for more sticks (instead of carrots) to use against China. While this “shoot down” is not a direct action against China, it would be a clear signal that the US can possess an active ASAT capability at any time if it so desires. That is a serious development as the previous US ASAT system using F-15s was mothballed in the 1980’s.
There are many significant political ramifications that would happen as a result of this. The US has been berating the Chinese on their ASAT test but now demonstrate that it is okay as long as it occurs at a low enough altitude to prevent long-lasting debris and can “save lives”. This is close to an implied “ok” for the US and other nations to conduct more ASAT tests, which could open another arms race. I am also certain that Russian and China would also see this as a slap in the face as they are trying to revive the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space treaty discussion and ban on space weapons. It would further negatively affect the relations between them and the US. Which could lead to increased tensions, arms buildup, etc etc etc. Nothing good for anyone outside of arms manufacturers and politicians that need a bogeyman to scare people into voting for them.

Posted by: b | Feb 16 2008 6:11 utc | 13

Spy Satellite Blast, Caught on Tape
More, here

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 21 2008 18:43 utc | 14

“Science does not have a moral dimension. It is like a knife. If you give it to a surgeon or a murderer, each will use it differently.”
Yes, he’s putting the moral responsibility square on the shoulders of the talking monkeys that currently mis-use science to explore and understand the universe via better weaponry. As it should, and can only, be.
Say what you like, but I’d much rather be alive today with science than during the “real” eras of Camelot or Robin of Loxley (not the nostalgic, golden hour lit, gloopy flavoured ones) where I’d probably be dead (as would most of y’all for many now trivial reasons), or blind from injuries sustained pre-school or later in my youth – IF me & mum survived childbirth back then

Posted by: jcairo | Feb 22 2008 10:10 utc | 15