Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 20, 2008
The Big Bailout

My last economy posting was about the monoliners. Credit insurance companies who actually have two lines of business, municipal bond insurance and CDS/CDO/junk insurance. As the second business line is in the doldrums, there were attempts to split the sound business from the risky one. Two arguments have come up against this.

The first, by Roubini, says that the municipal credit insurance will likely turn out to be a bad business too. The housing crisis will hit municipals hard and some might well default. For examples look at the problems of Vallejo, CA or Lavon, TX.

The second reason is that astonishingly no one is volunteering to be on the losing side of such business split and people are threatening to litigate:

It appears they have discovered that they lack a legal basis for preferring the muni policyholders over the others, and even if they try not to prefer one group over another, it is going to be well nigh impossible to come up with a formula that won’t be contested.

When the bond insurers will be downgraded, the debt they insured will be downgraded too. 

Then the Banks who hold such debt will need $20-30 billion in additional reserves, i.e. real fresh capital, or go into bankruptcy. That can not be allowed because the systemic effects of large bank defaults would threaten to tear down the whole Jenga tower of the finacial system. We will therefore likely see some big U.S. banks getting nationalized and their losses socialized. (The system might come down anyway.)

In the UK the government has taken over
Northern Rock and now the taxpayer will have to carry the risk
of a likely default of at least $200 billion in bad Northern Rock debt. The housing crisis in Britain
has started a bit later than in the U.S., but it might well become
worse. Until Monday banks in the UK financed up to 125%
of home equities that are now in decline. The concentration of financial
business in London and its shrinking due to the downturn will reinforce the house price slump there.

There are other forms of socializing losses. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp, the federal backup for company pension plans, announced to move 45% instead of the current 28% of its $55 billion holding from bonds into stocks. That is quite an injection for Wall Street and will pump up stock prices. But it will bring a huge loss for the government backed pension fund when equity markets will finally acknowledge the coming economic slump.

Yesterday Roubini argued that there will be 10-15 million repossessions in the U.S. housing market generating losses between $1 and 2 trillion.
People will send in the keys to the banks and just walk away. Companies get advised to do so. Citizens will do so too. (Are there enough sound bridges for these people to live under?)

The whole debt based financial and credit scam that has driven the expansion of the last years is threatening to come and there is nothing that can be done about it.

The Financial Times’ Martin Wolf, widely read, now agrees with Roubini’s dark general outlook and explains how all these losses will be socialized:

The risks are indeed high and the ability of the authorities to deal with them more limited than most people hope. This is not to suggest that there are no ways out. Unfortunately, they are poisonous ones. In the last resort, governments resolve financial crises. This is an iron law.

Rescues can occur via overt government assumption of bad debt, inflation, or both.

Japan chose the first, much to the distaste of its ministry of finance. But Japan is a creditor country whose savers have complete confidence in the solvency of their government.

The US, however, is a debtor. It must keep the trust of foreigners. Should it fail to do so, the inflationary solution becomes probable. This is quite enough to explain why gold costs $920 an ounce.

The U.S. government can not carry much more debt without bad consequences. It can not nationalize all big banks. The solution has therefore to be inflation. If the Dollar loses half its value, the bad debt will have been halved too.

The process of igniting inflation to ‘clean up’ the bad debt has, I believe, already started. The Fed currently pumps out unprecedented amounts of fresh money towards the banking system and this money finds its way into commodity markets. Oil closed over $100/barrel yesterday and, inflation adjusted, is near its historic 1979 high.

By paying higher prices for essential products, gas, food, toilet paper etc., and by higher taxes consumers will, in the end, pay for the big bailout.

Comments

“By paying higher prices for essential products, gas, food, toilet paper etc., and by higher taxes consumers will, in the end, pay for the big bailout.”
As they always do, and always should. This is the real iron law.
The unwashed multitudes in America resent being treated as citizens, as a group.
They want plenty and privilege, and to be left alone to play in their nation full of running tap water and televisions.
The demands of participating in a participatory democracy, beginning with being factually and actually educated and informed about how things work, and how things stand — uh-huh well there’s football and basketball and baseball and NASCAR and fashion and also that political horse race, and these things are all a lot more fun than whatever it is you want from me.
“I’m an American! You can’t tell me what to do.”
The Upper East Side Liberation Army exists in the vacuum of power and responsibility the American populace leaves in its wake, at home and all over the world.
UESLA rules by popular demand.

Posted by: UESLA | Feb 20 2008 16:54 utc | 1

The Bankers’ Bailout

“There’s no bailout with government money, none whatsoever,” Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson emphasized. But even as the administration has stuck to its laissez-faire stance in public, behind the scenes a covert bailout has been under way, with a number of public and quasi-public agencies quietly dispensing vast sums to financial institutions saddled with worthless or near worthless mortgage securities. All the while, homeowners at the heart of the problem have been left largely to their own woes. The rescue operation brings to mind John Kenneth Galbraith’s dictum that in the United States, the only respectable form of socialism is socialism for the rich.

Posted by: b | Feb 20 2008 18:02 utc | 2

Reuters: Inflation gathers steam, housing slides

A steady rise in consumer prices in January pointed to persistent inflation pressures despite fresh signs on Wednesday that the declining housing sector remains a drag on the economy.
The Consumer Price Index, a broadly based gauge of U.S. inflation, rose a faster-than-forecast 0.4 percent for a second straight month and was up a steep 4.3 percent in the 12 months through January, a Labor Department report showed.

And those are the fudged official numbers.

Posted by: b | Feb 20 2008 18:19 utc | 3

You’ve been reading Ritholz lately?
Great summary, Bernhard.

Posted by: Jeremiah | Feb 20 2008 19:35 utc | 4

This is priceless. You know, all this toxic alphabet sludge, the CDOs, the CDSs, the LBOs… in short, all the BBLs going FIZZ one after the other, so one begins to think the economy must be in a headlong tumble down the mountain?..
Well, you shouldn’t think that. It isn’t like that at all. It is merely a double-dipping “W” recovery.
W recovery. As in “Dubya”, right? It couldn’t get more reassuring than that.

Posted by: Alamet | Feb 20 2008 19:54 utc | 5

With the municipalities broke, who will pay the sheriff for running off all those that squatt in what was formerly their houses?
Oh yeah, that is what Blackwater is for. Never mind.

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Feb 20 2008 20:04 utc | 6

@Jeremiah – You’ve been reading Ritholz lately?
Yes I read him, but not regularly. He is mostly on the same thought-track than I am anyway …

Posted by: b | Feb 20 2008 20:10 utc | 7

To expand a bit on my comment in 7
I read quite a lot of sites and sometimes seem to further this or that viewpoint of this or that site. But this is not because I think these people are right. I try to avoid to read or quote people I totally agree with. I also avoid people who are totally wrong – why slap flies? Otherwise MoA would simply be another echochamber.
Recently I often quote Roubini. I find his diagnose mostly correct. But he upped his loss risk evaluation to $1+ trillion much later than I did and his recipies are certainly different from mine.
Back in early December I wrote:

With defaults and dubious investment holdings all around, the economy is in deep trouble. To prevent or at least cushion the economic downturn Roubini called for the central banks to lower interest rates. All of them, except the European Central Bank, seem to follow that advice.
I regard this as pushing on a string with bad side effects.

Two month later Roubini agreed and even used the “pushing on a string” picture I used before.
I really try not to steal from other sides but to add value and use attributed well written parts of explanations from other sides to argue my take, not theirs.
So I don’t read Ritholz’ Big Pictures that much – too much jazz btw – and in general the same reading on the economy that I have. I read Mish who is totally wrong in believing deflation is coming. But I don’t quote him because there isn’t much use in deconstucting him.
If I would do this differently it wouldn’t be me and it wouldn’t be fun.
just sayin ..

Posted by: b | Feb 20 2008 20:53 utc | 8

Rescues for Homeowners in Debt Weighed

Prodded in part by some of the nation’s biggest banks, the Bush administration and Congress are considering costly new proposals for the government to rescue hundreds of thousands of homeowners whose mortgages are higher than the value of their houses.

But with the current efforts to arrest the housing collapse so far bearing little fruit, Washington is being forced to explore new ideas, among them the idea of a federal mortgage guarantee for troubled borrowers.
And policy makers are listening to proposals from industry and community groups to use government funds to purchase and refinance billions of dollars in mortgages now in danger of default.

“community groups”? Who is that? K-Street?

In Washington, it will be difficult to engineer a bailout similar to the one for savings and loan companies in the early 1990s, because Democrats and Republicans alike cringe at the very word bailout and fear a backlash by people who never became overextended.

Bank of America, which is in the process of acquiring Countrywide Financial and has potentially huge exposure, has circulated a proposal to create a new federal agency that would buy vast quantities of delinquent mortgages at a deep discount and replace them with fixed-rate federally guaranteed loans.

Credit Suisse executives said they have held lengthy meetings with F.H.A. officials and have urged the agency to relax rules that currently disqualify many borrowers.

Posted by: b | Feb 22 2008 6:42 utc | 9