Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 25, 2008
Elections – I’m tired of waiting

by Uncle $cam
lifted from a comment

Excellent. Thanks for that post JJ, @56

When Zinn says,

This seizes the country every four years because
we have all been brought up to believe that voting is crucial in
determining our destiny, that the most important act a citizen can engage in is to go to the polls and choose one of the two mediocrities who have already been chosen for us. It is a multiple choice test so narrow, so specious, that no self-respecting teacher would give it to students
.

he is speaking to me. Bellgong wrote something in the ot to the effect of it taking, "7 of the next 9 election cycles or so .."
or some such, I’m not sure we have that long, nay, I’m damn sure we
don’t, and even if we did, who the hell has the time to wait?

Like Neil Young sang, "… I’m getting old …"

I’m tired of waiting, I’m sick of being Charlie Brown ever trying to
kick that football, I’m ready to smash Lucy in the face for once,
metaphorically speaking of course, I’d never attack a female cartoon.

How many years do you guys have?

I’ve been waiting, and working and hoping, voting for "change" for
decades, as I imagine most of you have, and every year it gets a little
bit worse, slowly, mind you, ever so slowly, so we aren’t aware of it,
but the water keeps rising and we keep adjusting to it.

We collectively are like the Katrina victims left alone to drown,
only slowly, ever so slowly and our social intelligence tells us
something is wrong. But we dare not look. Better to not see the social
and moral and material decay around us.

We best not look to hard, because the water is up to the back porch by now.

But it’s getting to the point, that we can not not look anymore, in other words, it’s damn near in our face, inside and out, now.

Inside within even our own immediate families, outside within our
communities, and civil infrastructure. I’m reminded of a post by Loose
Shanks, or tante amie or someone talking of …

… ahhh, here it is, about being lost in the wilderness, indeed:

Wilderness is tryin’ to make it to Social Security age, when the
cost of living is up and going through the roof, with your paycheck
worth less and less in phoney US dollar play money. That’s what I’m
talking about … Wilderness.

Wilderness is having poor relatives calling you for a handout, and
everyone staying away from Uncle Ernie’s funeral, because nobody can
afford the bill …

Tenebrous, and witty but oh so true, oh so serious. At least from
where I sit. Anyway, it’s been two years and that post still sits with
me, I’d encourage you guys and gals to go and read it.

/rant

I’ll go rant somewhere else now, thank you…

Comments

If you think this is just about water, then you don’t know the man in Black.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 25 2008 10:08 utc | 1

b- ALERT – might be of interest to your banking friends in Germany – read on.
Wilderness — ha, we ain’t seen nothin’ yet.
Uncle, excellent post, but must differ in one point. They didn’t create Katrina. They’ve been creating this since very early ’70’s. Better analogy is a forest fire they set & are blocking all the roads out, after they’ve evacuated.
(I think I even read this wk. that one of the Am. car cos. is buying out the contracts of all their hourly workers. Getting ready to close up union shops. Meanwhile, Soros’ partner has the rights to distribute chinese cars in America & is busy setting up factories in mexico.)
I’ve been saying for awhile that Oybama is an even further right ideologue than HRC. An immediately relevant & Extremely Impt. example is the “sub-prime mortgage debacle”. Candidate policies were ~ : Edwards – mandatory freeze on evictions; HRC voluntary freeze on evictions 90 days + freezing interest rates 5 yrs.; Oybama – beyond nightmare – Tough Shit Kiddies…oh, but I’m supposed to impersonate a “Democrat”, so I’ll provide counselors. (NO, I am not making this up.)
Well, speaking of setting the forest fires & blocking our exits,…dum de dum… are you ready for this??The Sub-Prime Mortgage Manger has been found (scroll down to Wed. Feb. 20 – interview begins 15 mins. in.)Who is the Mother of it all – Obamination’s Finance Chairman. She, Penny Pritzker/the Pritzker family, got together w/Ernst & Young & Merrill Lynch & hatched the plot for turning what were known as Predatory Loans into an industry by securitizing them & foisting them off on unsuspecting buyers by mixing them in w/quality mortgage loans.
b-, would you consider contacting Tim Anderson, the Chicago banking whistle blower who has the goods & asking him to write a piece on it?
(Anderson notes that her brother is high up in the Mouthpiece dept. of HRC’s campaign. He obviously has much less effect as she’s willing to make a token effort, but it’s enough to keep her from outing Oybama on the whole affair. Tim said he’s given this story, completely documented apparently, to ~38 journalists, but none of them will touch it. So, it’s clearly up to us to check it out & shoot it around the blogosphere.)

Posted by: jj | Feb 25 2008 10:29 utc | 2

How can elections be made meaningful again?
In Germany we have found the solution in bringing in new parties.
The Green Party was founded on only one issues:
– The main founders were from the 1968 peace/student movement and from the environmental activists. They found some overlapping interest and started to build small local groups.
They were despised by the establishment and in the beginning also by the media. Some near to the party founded their own daily newspaper which is still in circulation today. In some states they were under secret service observation.
Eventually they got voted into city parliaments, than into a few state parliaments and finally into the federal business. They went into a coalition with the social-democrats.
They have achieved a lot in their main field, environmental issues. Now all parties here have a “green” touch. But they lost their left tending but little thought out economic program and under neolib influence they moved to the right. (This was actually also an age issue – the once young and disgruntlet base had grown into well off establishment people.)
There was need for something new and a group of union folks split off from the social-democrats and united with the former communists of east Germany. The joining issue here was class and the destroying of the “social net”, unemployment benefits etc.
Again the media despised them, the establishment send the secret service etc …
Yesterday they were for the first time voted into the Hamburg state parliament, the third entry in a west-german state parliament. They will win some 7+% in the next federal election.
Even if they do not join into a ruling coalition they are pulling the other parties further to the left. Today the NYT headlines: German Vote Confirms Shift of Political Center to the Left. Yeap.
I see three lessons:
– a new block/party can work only successful when running on a single/few issues.
– people have to do the hard work and in the beginning there is little reward.
– it has to start at the local level and go from there.
Now in the US there is little chance for anything to grow as a third party. (A possibility might be a split-off from the Democrats.) The structure of the political system is fixed around two parties and can not be changed.
But the issue is not total change – that would require a violent revolution and have zero chance – the issue is to pull the whole system into a new direction. To do this within the two-party system is by joining a party and work on two or three narrow issues that have some popular “pull”.
Anti-war? Get elected to the local schoolboard and take care that the libraries are filled with anti-war literature.
The central point is not “to wait”, but “to do” – difficult, I know.

Posted by: b | Feb 25 2008 12:03 utc | 3

Anti-war? Get elected to the local schoolboard and take care that the libraries are filled with anti-war literature.
What say you, Uncle$cam ? Maybe wait for the next generation to maybe make a difference ?

Posted by: DM | Feb 25 2008 13:39 utc | 4

I’m with you DM; a generation or two is way way too long. Drop dead date is November this year, simply because the current cabal must retain ownership of the govt to stay out of jail.
jj said above, “…They didn’t create Katrina.” You can’t be so sure of that. I saw it on teevee and it looked manmade to me; huge, concentrated, aimed. The storm spent some time around Florida going this way and that to give the guys at the joysticks some practice before the big hit, and to time its movement with the big low forming (being formed)over the Gulf. Sure I could be wrong, but who knows how this HAARP and weather control business works? Too many coincidences if nothing else.

Posted by: rapt | Feb 25 2008 17:00 utc | 5

Maybe wait for the next generation to maybe make a difference ?
At the risk of sounding overly myopic, it’s to late…
Empire must fall, yet the Fall of the Rovean empire is specifically designed to place as much wealth in the hands of the dead soul cannibals as possible to further their station into whatever is next.
With more wealth than you ever dreamt of, nay, more wealth than you can ever dream of.
And to directly and indirectly devastate and decimate the planet and it’s inhabitants as deemed possible.
Sort of a Salvian thought. Salvian said that the fall of Empire was not the worst thing that could happen.
The worst thing that could have happened is that the Empire would not have fallen’.
Only one must read the preceding with Aesop’s eyes, for what we behold is a schizophrenia: Delusion
“I seek to build God’s Kingdom. Let all others fall, for they will.”
A schizophrenic psychopaths hallucination made manifest, much like how so much was given to the theories of madman John Nash Like something out of the Ronald Reagan Home for the Criminally Insane sucking us all into the psychosis;in a word a kakistocracy.
Aesop’s
The Dog And The Shadow

A DOG, crossing a bridge over a stream with a piece of flesh in his mouth, saw his own shadow in the water and took it for that of another Dog, with a piece of meat double his own in size. He immediately let go of his own, and fiercely attacked the other Dog to get his larger piece from him. He thus lost both: that which he grasped at in the water, because it was a shadow; and his own, because the stream swept it away.

Lear (The terror of the earth): Who is it that can tell me who I am? The Fool: Lear’s shadow.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 25 2008 17:16 utc | 6

I noticed Piratenpartei took 0,2% in Hamburg. Not much, but got to start somewhere. And it is spreading (way cool). People learn from what others are doing.
I agree with the running for schoolboard thing, not that it alone will stop the wars. But unless you are out to become president or rather one of the superwealthy who owns presidents, you will never be in the position where you can stop the wars yourself. And if you are against the power being that concentrated you do not want to be there anywya. All you can do is work to move the world an inkling in the right direction and hope it spreads.
And even if all you achieve is that more kids has access to antiwar literature, well that is not a bad thing.

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Feb 25 2008 18:30 utc | 7

noticed Piratenpartei took 0,2% in Hamburg.
Yeah – sorry, didn’t vote for them. The issue for me was moving the spectrum to the left and I voted along that line.
Annectode:
There was a party which did a lot of street action before the election, Die Partei (The Party). They featured a slightly modificated Alfred E. Neuman picture on their posters as their major candidate and got into quite serious discussions with people who wondered about them. They didn’t got any votes because they were not on the ballot at all. It was a satirical art project.
Funny thing – a lot of folks and media took it seriously. They were embarassed when they found out, but it did move a thing or two. People started to look at other parties as “fraud” too and delved into real issues. Small effort, but effective.

Posted by: b | Feb 25 2008 19:31 utc | 8

hahaha b, that #8 sounds sort of like the GUNS AND DOPE PARTY thought up by the late Bob Wilson.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 25 2008 19:53 utc | 9

Addendumb to my #6
Capitalism in an Apocalyptic Mood
Aesop’s
The Wolf And The Lamb

WOLF, meeting with a Lamb astray from the fold, resolved not to lay violent hands on him, but to find some plea to justify to the Lamb the Wolf’s right to eat him. He thus addressed him: “Sirrah, last year you grossly insulted me.” “Indeed,” bleated the Lamb in a mournful tone of voice, “I was not then born.” Then said the Wolf, “You feed in my pasture.” “No, good sir,” replied the Lamb, “I have not yet tasted grass.” Again said the Wolf, “You drink of my well.” “No,” exclaimed the Lamb, “I never yet drank water, for as yet my mother’s milk is both food and drink to me.” Upon which the Wolf seized him and ate him up, saying, “Well! I won’t remain supperless, even though you refute every one of my imputations.” The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 25 2008 20:08 utc | 10

askod a.k.a. futureprimeministerofSweden will remember b.

Posted by: beq | Feb 25 2008 22:13 utc | 11

Uncle $cam, you are a pillar of this place — “Moon of Alabama, hosted by Uncle $cam!”
And here, it seems, you are stealing yourself for yet more, unbroken disappointment; resigned to Empire’s victory; almost “giving up the ghost.” It’s not Zinn’s urging us on — to take “direct action against the obstacles to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” — you run with from this piece, but his pointing out our political weakness — our apathy and cyncism, and our unwillingness to remain passionately, both personally and collectively, engaged, well beyond merely casting a vote.
I don’t know. I’ve dared to greet this political season, and especially Barack Obama’s candidacy, as a great opportunity to marshal and unleash all our pent-up progressive passions. Maybe more Aeschylus, rather than Aesop — Prometheus Unbound!
Perhaps your finger is better-placed on the political pulse, and what looks like a mounting grass-roots fire to me, you see for the “flash in the pan” that it is. Wet blanket or unassailable realist?
Have I read you wrong, here?
Not to bend this note completely out of shape, but I know disappointment, political and otherwise, pretty intimately. Indeed, I’ve struggled with down-and-out “depression” for years (resorting, among a jillion other therapies, even to ECT). No doubt, some of this struggle is the consequence of being born with a progressive’s heart. And I’m no spring chicken, either.
Still, I’m gettin’ “Fired up!” and “Ready to go!” A whole new generation seems to be signing on. Some, who’ve abandoned the the political fight, going back, say, to the crushing defeats of ’68, are pricking up their ears; harnessing old energies long left out to pasture.
Am I on a “fool’s errand?” I don’t think so.
And I don’t think Zinn, still tireless, still agitating, still engaged, would think so, either.
I don’t think Sara Robinson, whose senses portend revolution even, thinks so:

America may be far more ready for far more change than anyone really believes is possible at this moment.

I don’t think the students who shut down 7 miles of a Texas highway, marching to vote, think so.
This seems like precisely a time not to abandon the ramparts and the barricades to the rising, fetid waters of Empire’s cold and menacing creep. But, here you are, more or less confiding that you are relaxing into the swell and the suffocation that, near abouts, awaits us all.
Brother! You’re our “canary in the coal mine!” If you are choking, are we doomed? No “passing on the torch,” just rolling over? Can we throw you a line? Send you a raft? Is there really no hope?

Posted by: manonfyre | Feb 25 2008 22:34 utc | 12

Thanks for the links manonfyre!

Posted by: beq | Feb 25 2008 23:29 utc | 13

Uncle,
I’ve been waiting a long time for social justice in the US. We need re-distribution of wealth big time. The full thrust the right wing machine began when I was about in 9th grade. 1973 or so. By the time I graduated in 1977 the whole right wing Trilat agenda was well on its way. I have waited all my life for social justice but have had to watch as the rich and connected get larger and larger favors and more and more wealthy. Our wages have been fairly flat for 30 years. It just don’t happen for the lower classes in the US. You do have some power locally if you make the right connections, but change on the state and federal level is hard. I blame alot of this on Doug Frazer who was head of the UAW in the late 1970s and early 1980s. He just died yesterday at 91 years old. He got the UAW workers to take concessions to save Chrysler and the labor movement hasn’t recovered. Ad in the airport controllers being fired under Reagan and wham, labor is toothless.
On Obama, I honestly think hes sand bagging. You don’t have people with his and his wifes background and not have some deep connection to the lower classes and believe in fairness.
He does have the most liberal record in the US senate and that includes Berny Sanders a avowed socialist. There could be hope. But as I crowd 50 years old, its looking dimmer and dimmer for the kind of society I believe in.

Posted by: jdp | Feb 26 2008 2:27 utc | 14

In the words of Marge from the simpsons, “What WHAAT?”.. I am sure I don’t rate for article mention, my ‘insight’ is generally put out in hope of correction!
The point was about time, that the effort going forward doesn’t end in november; and looking back, we got here after 5 of 7 elections went RNC. The dems have gone along on the ride right, and it will take a long effort to get them straight again.
It was lying, smiling Reagan who started reduction of nuclear weapon stockpiles with the USSR, stealing Tip O’Neil’s thunder. Who talks about that stuff now? Instead there will be dem talk of clean (sic) nuke plants, with no mention by politicians or press, save Dennis Kucinich, of disease and a worldwide nuke weapons race, a cold war on many fronts. Speaking of Kucinich, our conservative dems have selected him for unelection, apparently for making voters remember what the dem party is, what it represents, what its possiblity is. Lefties and off-axis ghandi-s need to move the discussion on a long time frame or the only quick thing coming is a return to the lawless RNC executive.
Defense-only military, clean industry, clean energy, elimination of nuclear weapons at home and endless diplomacy for the same abroad. Diplomacy aimed not at fortune but good policy, the pact of governance for the betterment or da peoples. Medicine for, you know, making people better, not just for profit. Human RIGHTS. All that shit. It ain’t coming easy, or quick; even if it’s a I-have-a-dream moment I don’t see the ground moving just yet; more like post-withdrawal gas pump price shock and angry talking heads, McCain and Kristol saying “we told you so” and people believing it.
D’oh!
🙂

Posted by: bellgong | Feb 26 2008 2:30 utc | 15

@jdp, you know better than that – re Oybama. Where he started out sho as shit ain’t where he is now. Don’t believe me? Google up Hamilton Project/Hamilton Democrats. As you’ll discover, he’s their boy on domestic issues & Brzez’s on foreign policy.
This has some excellent info. on how Brzez is already shifting foreign policy, moving it away from ME conflicts & toward focus on his usual bete noirs – Russia & China. Here’s a bit for b real:
President Bush may not know what he is doing on his current visit to five African countries, but Zbigniew Brzezinski knows exactly what the mission is. The Brzezinski policy is to foment destabilization and chaos in Africa under the auspices of the new United States African command (US-AFRICOM), all for the purpose of driving the Chinese out of Africa. As Zbigniew announced on November 30, 2007 in the Washington Post, he intends to cut off Chinese access to oil, other energy sources, and strategic raw materials on the African continent. …
And highly entertaining stuff on how his patrons (Soros is very close to Brzez, as both are driven by extreme hostility to Soviet Union) removed his opposition in previous races. (Keep in mind that there’s nothing in recent NYT revelations on McCain that weren’t published years ago.)
During his quest for a seat in the United States Senate from Illinois in 2004, Obama received a scandal boost not once but twice. Obama’s opponent in the Illinois Democratic senatorial primary of March 2004 was Marson Blair Hull, a wealthy securities broker who spent $28 million on television advertising and was heavily favored to defeat Obama in that primary. But Hull’s campaign was torpedoed by a barrage of well timed media charges that he had abused his former wife. Hull was therefore obliged to drop out of the race.
After Hull had been eliminated, Obama still had to face his Republican opponent in the November general election. Here his adversary was Jack Ryan, an investment banker from Goldman Sachs. Ryan had divorced his wife Jeri in 1999, and the case was sealed at their mutual request. Suddenly the Chicago Tribune and WLS television began undertaking mighty exertions to get these divorce records made public, even though they involved a dispute about child custody. On June 22, 2004, Los Angeles Superior Court judge Robert Schneider released the court documents in question. They revealed an accusation by Jeri Ryan against her husband, now Obama’s political competitor, to the effect that Jack Ryan had induced her to frequent sex clubs in a number of locations, and had attempted to coerce her into sexual intercourse in the presence of third parties. Judge Schnider’s decision was all the more extraordinary because it was made in the face of the direct opposition by both parties to the divorce, and bore on a Family Court matter that is normally kept vigorously secret. It was as if some totalitarian invisible hand were intervening in favor of the beleaguered Obama candidacy. At this point Jack Ryan was compelled to abandon his candidacy at the urging of Dennis Hastert, then Speaker of the House. By now the Illinois Democratic Party appeared to have gotten the message that Obama enjoyed divine protection, since they did not nominate a serious candidate to oppose him in the November election. Instead, they brought in a carpetbagger and well known windbag in the person of Allan Keyes of Maryland, who predictably went on to lose to Obama by the most lopsided margin in Illinois political history.
This process also recalls the 1988 elimination of top Democratic contender Gary Hart through a sex scandal. Hart’s prospective opponent was Bush the Elder, another intrinsically weak candidate favored by the CIA who needed police state assistance to make it to the White House. Gary Hart was knocked out of contention by a scandal involving Donna Rice, with whom Hart had been embroiled with the help of underworld figure Don Aronow, an ally of the Bush family.

{As always one needs to put on ones wading boots when reading Tarpley, BUT he does read Brzezinski very carefully, so in this area he is unusually reliable.}

Posted by: jj | Feb 26 2008 4:01 utc | 16

Seems like a whole lotta peeps is getting tired of waiting.
Bremerton police said four banks were vandalized early Thursday, with each incident involving windows broken with pieces of concrete that had notes taped to them, reported KIRO 7 Eyewitness News.

According to police, the vandals did not go in any of the banks.
“No entry was gained and nothing was taken, so it appears this was the delivery of some kind of message by the perpetrators,” Andy Oakley with Bremerton police said.
Police said the content of the notes were all the same and read as follows:
“Directions: Attach to brick and throw through window”
“Here is your brick back.”
“Recognize it? You should.”
“It is part of the wall that you, as one of the elite upper class, have helped to build between the minority ruling class, and the majority working class throughout history. By flaunting your decadence, you have made yourself a target.”
“Get used to it!”
“Social youth chaos-f___ s___ up!”
The Pissed & Powerless Call a Press Conference – the spirit of Jerry & Abbie re-emerge

Posted by: jj | Feb 26 2008 4:56 utc | 17

In Obama’s campaign ads on TV here in Texas, he makes strong mention of “ending the war”. Clinton makes no such strong declaration; in fact today on the News Hour she was seen (and heard) making some statement about diplomacy requiring both olive branch and the arrows. And to my ear she did seem to inflect strongly on the freaking “arrows”.
During Clinton’s run-up to her campaign, her office sent out newsletters listing all our nation’s problems, with the glaring omission of anything about Iraq. I received those by email, before she officially joined the race. Clinton is a lot shiftier in public; Obama not so much. She’s dismissing Obama for welcoming foreign negotiations “with preparations”, instead of what she favors (preconditions), that is, laying a pistol on the table.

Posted by: Copeland | Feb 26 2008 5:10 utc | 18

Dear All,
The consistency and quality of content here at MoA is vital to my daily understanding of the iceberg waiting to bring down another Titanic. The problem is no matter what combination of words we skillfully choose to convey our opinions, the still emerging consequence of what use to be called “Post-Modernism” has leveled the field of “discourse,” allowing the most mundane and inconsequential facets of modern life to compete with the most daunting and spectacular challenges humanity has ever faced, thus creating, at our very core, an inability to prioritize the meta-disaster of micro-tragedy that’s been slowly and carefully built beneath our feet.

Posted by: Lizard | Feb 26 2008 5:31 utc | 19

In less time than our grandchildren have on earth, we will be living
back in the age of stones, just like There Will Be Blood, except,
suppose we’ll all have solar power cell phones to call the sheriff
when marauding bands steal our livestock and ransack our gardens,
those of us who have arable land, and can still reach the aquifer.
Go ahead. Watch There Will Be Blood, and imagine waiting for a
sunny day, a little later in spring when the sun is a little higher,
for your solar cells to charge your electric scooter, so you can run
into town to buy a new inner tube and fix a broken spoke, for next
time when the sun is high, and the road is clear, and you need to run.
They have already begun mixing radioactive scrap into our sheet metals.
They have already begun splicing bacterial genes into our food grains.
Global warmed earth and sea is bringing a pandemic of molds and fungis.
Our soils and our inner selves are festering with lethal biochemicals.
They have recently announced open season on our 401(k) retirement funds.
Middlemen will survive the middle-class. Middlemen, and government drones.
Workers will slave ’til they drop, shoulding the pyramid ponzi of social
welfare for the elite classes, for the middlemen, and for the authorities,
Mengelen pols who measures our diseases, plot them, then expand upon them.
Hail the vampire demi-gods, their 1% cock-and-balls rampant on vermilion.

Posted by: Four Fives | Feb 26 2008 5:39 utc | 20

confided earlier a personal note — years of struggle, years adrift and drowning in the deep blue. this isn’t altogether relevant to most of the conversations we have here. nonetheless, there are a couple more points of personal reference i wish to share.
through my worst, a note to myself often served me well: don’t make philosophy out of this. in other words, don’t turn personal and passing despair, constant and unresolvable though it may seem, into some dictum of sharable truth. ‘my life is all the ______, right now. hence, life is ______.’
something else about me at my worst: i tend to keep it to myself. ever known someone who had a cold or flu, and was assiduous about limiting their contact with other people? like, they wouldn’t shake someone else’s hand, so as not to spread the germ?
this forum, moon of alabama, has been a fixture, a touch-point in my life going back to the billmon days. my participation has ebbed and flowed over this time — the ebbs, periods in which this, sort of, self-quarantine was in force. didn’t want to spread the germ of the affliction that ailed me. so, it could be said, the level of my participation here is some measure of my mood.
writing here, now, i am at least on the beach, not floundering or in over my head — out of that deep, dark water. and it’s a kind of sobriety for me, and all that infinite sadness, a kind of abated addiction.
that being said, i’m finding a lot of what i read here of late, particularly some of the notes in this thread, challenges to my sobriety. it feels like i’m mingling with other addicts, current users of all that sick dope — seductive sirens on rocky islands off the shore, singing me back into the deep — tempting me to use that crippling smack once again.
thanks, dear friends, but no thanks. gonna stay outta that water and do the beach for awhile. i see several paths nearby, over different hills, and a bigger life just beyond each one.
didn’t do me any good, when i was in over my head, to hear it. but i’ll say it anyway. some of y’all are in too deep. c’mon back! come back!
not to go all metaphysical (or even post-metaphysical), but feel inclined to say . . . there is more to Life, more to Who and Where we really are, right here, right now — if we’d but notice.
all my love

Posted by: manonfyre | Feb 26 2008 11:23 utc | 21

More on Oybama’s key foreign policy advisors (bobby Rubin will run things domestically, as the Democratic Party has become the bobby rubin party since Clinton).
Another key Obama adviser, Dennis Ross. Ross, for many years under both Clinton and Bush 2, a key–he has advised Clinton and both Bushes. He oversaw US policy toward Israel/Palestine. He pushed the principle that the legal rights of the Palestinians, the rights recognized under international law, must be subordinated to the needs of the Israeli government–in other words, their desires, their desires to expand to do whatever they want in the Occupied Territories. And Ross was one of the people who, interestingly, led the political assault on former Democratic President Jimmy Carter. . . Still Have Hope for Change???

Posted by: jj | Feb 26 2008 11:36 utc | 22

jj,
I know about him (Obama)being at the event that introduced the Hamilton Project. And I know about his foriegn policy team. Most of his team besides Soros and Brez outside the inner circle are focused on Africa as you point out. Africa is the new frontier for explotation.
But, somewhere along the line, he will pump more money into the domestic economy. Money will flow to inner cities and states. Thats just the dem way. When a dem is in office the money flows, when a rethugs in office money dries up. You can see several shifts already even before the election. Boone Pickens is predicting oil prices to fall. Wall Street is moving money because they know taxes are going up. Thats why tech stocks will do well, they don’t pay dividends.
Things will be different, just not how we ultimately would like.

Posted by: djp | Feb 26 2008 12:54 utc | 23

Thank you, manonfyre. I am to overwhelmed at the moment to reply in a manner I feel adequate to your sharing above, but it is appreciated. Sometimes, for myself, or really often times, I have to go in deep to find the boundaries to be able to come back to balance.
Our society is one of addiction like a tapeworm that feeds, a metanarrative
of unhealed trauma and neurogenesis played out on a stage for all to see.
That’s the Reality of [todays] “Paradigm Conspiracy” .

We see a pervasive mindset of control and domination permeating our cultural institutions, a mindset driven by the fear of anarchy. If someone—some authority or power over us—doesn’t control us, society will fall into chaos, or so we’re to believe.
But who controls the controllers? What kind of order do those in positions of power have in mind? Is power-over an order that works—i.e., that creates social harmony and makes us happy? Or does it create wars, blind obedience, inner deadness, Littleton, Colorado nightmares, injustices, epidemic substance and process addictions, economic exploitation, cynicism, chronic stress, and unhappiness?
It doesn’t make sense, for example, that we control children morning to night with rewards and punishments and then wonder why they grow up selfish manipulators: “What’s in it for me?” or “Just don’t get caught!” That’s how child-rearing and schooling methods trained all of us to think. And if people grow up obsessed with gaining power over others—the chance to be in the one-up position and to control who’s rewarded and who’s punished—where’s the surprise? This is the logical extension of our cultural paradigm.
In other words, is our culture built on a paradigm that’s working for us as well as we need it to? Is our consensus philosophy shaping our institutions to serve us, or are we becoming servants to systems that warp our minds, consume our energies, and turn us into people we never wanted to be? When more and more of us find ourselves asking such core questions, it’s time to start rethinking things from the ground up. It’s time to reclaim our powers.

The Global Crisis of Addictions
Caught in deadly processes. Recovery: it’s not just for “addicts” anymore. It’s not even just for persons, not when addictive processes permeate every social system we’ve got, from schools to churches to workplaces to governments.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 26 2008 13:16 utc | 24

Onion News Network

Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results Of 2008 Election Early

Posted by: citizen | Feb 26 2008 16:55 utc | 25

goodness. that onion vid is prob the most cynical political stmt i’ve seen yet. now, off to find some paper towells to dry this keyboard…

Posted by: b real | Feb 26 2008 17:35 utc | 26

The onion is absolutely hilarious. I looked at some other vids and theres some funny shit over there.
Oh djp is me. I did my sign in wrong.

Posted by: jdp | Feb 27 2008 1:20 utc | 27

Okay, that was brilliant!
I usually roll my eyes, and hate lame ass skits like that, my mom and others use to send me link after link and e-mail after e-mail of stupid silly cute stuff her first few years on the WWW. It got to where I wouldn’t even open em, straight to the trash, and deleted em (only so many cute bunnies and cats and lame ass limericks and joke-care cards etc.. you can take…lol ) but, that one was quality. Well done and thanks, I needed that laugh…
Thanks citizen, that one is a keeper.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 27 2008 4:02 utc | 28

Here’s a treat, some may find of interest… a blogmate posts a juicy blog on an Orwell Biography

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 27 2008 5:55 utc | 29

JJ,
Speaking of banks and bricks…Bank Of America Won’t Let You Access Your Money
Silly Bill. He thought Bank of America would let him spend $5,800 on a home theater system just because he had over $10,000 in the bank. He tried to charge the system to his Bank of America Visa Platinum Check Card but was declined. Confused, Bill called Bank of America customer support for an explanation and had the sort of conversation that makes you want to drive a fork through your ear someone’s forehead.

So tonight I went to my local Best Buy, planning on surprising the wife with a new bigscreen TV.
We get there and, believe it or not, the Best Buy people are helpful, friendly, informative and DON’T try to push Monster cables on me. (I know – I nearly fainted too).
Having done my homework, I picked out a receiver, speaker system, wall mount, some blue ray movies , and a 58″ plasma TV. Total cost : $5870.69
So I head to the register to pay for my newly acquired goodies and my card – despite having a few grand more than the total in my “available funds” is declined.
[More:]
Puzzled – I call Bank of America , wait on hold about ten minutes, go through countless adverts for bank services, double authorizations etc and FINALLY I get to a human. Of course in spite of all of this the woman wants my information all over again even though I just typed it in. She wont even help me til I provide it and so I do.
I explain that I am in the store, at the register, and that I know I have available funds.
She puts me on hold about 5 minutes , then comes back and says “Im sorry – that’s over your daily limit. There’s nothing I can do. Was there anything else I can help you with?”
Remembering to keep a cool head, I ask about a supervisor giving me an override on the limit. She says “let me transfer you to the ATM department.” And before I can explain that this isn’t an ATM problem, she disconnects me.
Frustrated – I dial again, more menus, get a human, get transferred, get another human, get transferred, (every time re-verifying my ID)finally I get to the FOURTH person who apologizes 10 times and says “don’t worry sir – I can help you!”
I think I’m getting somewhere but then a supervisor comes on and explains to me that “Everyone in the United States that uses Bank of America has a daily spending limit of 5000.00 no matter what.”
Stunned, I ask for an exception and in a parent-giving-me-a-cookie tone he says “well, I suppose we can up that to 6000.00 just this once.”
At this point I am over an hour on the phone but we try the transaction again. Declined.
More hold time. He comes back and says that he is sorry but 6000. is the limit and buying gasoline and dinner earlier in the day is going to put me at more than 6 grand for the day and so I can come back tomorrow and buy the TV or I can go to my branch and get a money order.
Fuming, and doing my best to remain calm, the conversation goes like this:
“Let me get this straight – I have an “available” balance of nearly 10 grand in my account?”
“yes sir”
“And its not pending or a deposit waiting to clear, that’s my money, confirmed and in your bank?”
“yes sir”
“And you have kept me on the phone for over an hour, asked me multiple times to verify my identity and are satisfied that I am who I say I am?”
“yes sir”
“And you are going to deny me access to MY money?!?!”
“No sir – we are not denying you your money, your’re just over your daily limit.”
“My daily limit? This isn’t a credit card. It’s a PLATINUM Visa checkcard. I understand that you have to put limits in for my protection but I need to make this purchase”
“Im sorry theres nothing I can do”
At this point, after nearly an hour an twenty minutes on the phone, I lose my cool. I am embarrassed, have essentially shut down a register lane on a Friday night at Best Buy and am obviously the talk of the store both from employees and customers.
I ask to speak to a supervisor and am told that I am speaking to one. I ask to speak to HIS supervisor and am told that’s not possible.
Out of desperation I ask again and he says “wait just a moment”
More hold. Ten more minutes. I am fuming. He comes back and excitedly tells me “try it now.”
So for the umpteenth time I swipe my card. This time it comes up “authorization code needed”
I relay this to the BoA guy and he says “well, we are making progress”
A few more minutes of hold time later and he comes back with the code and makes my purchase go through.
I have NEVER experienced such shoddy customer service ever. Im sure Im preaching to the choir when I say this, but Monday morning I am cancelling my BoA account, and fellow consumerists – Stay the heck away from Bank of America!
As a side note, after the transaction was completed I said to the supervisor, “So, what if I was say, Donald Trump and wanted to spend 30 grand on something?”
His response, ” Well , for Mr Trump we would have made an accommodation ahead of time.”
I said “And if I’d decided tonight to buy the $14,999.99 71″ plasma TV in here this evening?”
“You wouldn’t not have been allowed to do that.”
At that point I hung up.
Sheesh!
Bank of America, though still thoroughly decrepit and evil, may have been sending a helpful signal. Large purchases like home theater systems should be charged to a credit card, ideally one that offers rewards and extended warranty protection. As Bank of America would say, it’s for your own good.

Had this very same scenario happen recently –at a credit union no doubt–, albeit with a much lower withdraw. It burns me to no end that they can tell me how much of MY own money I can spend…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 27 2008 7:10 utc | 30

So then there is already a system in place to counter a run on the banks.
“I want to get all my money!”
“Sorry, you are over your daily limit. Next!”

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Feb 27 2008 21:15 utc | 31

“So then there is already a system in place to counter a run on the banks.”
That was my immediate take on it. Fatcats never learned how to avoid another 1929, but they’ll be damned if they have to deal with the consequences themselves.

Posted by: Monolycus | Feb 28 2008 15:32 utc | 32