Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 1, 2008
Open Thread 08-01

News & views … please comment …

Comments

Why don’t people hang up on robocalls? I always do immiatedly and thought everybody does so, so I wonder how much such tactics matter.

When Mr. Raymond opened a political telemarketing firm, he was hired by a Republican challenging a New Jersey Democratic congressman. Mr. Raymond’s company — in a plan he says he hatched with the challenger’s advisers — called liberal Democrats and urged them to vote for the Green Party candidate.
Those same advisers, he says, gave Mr. Raymond another assignment: to call white households asking them to vote for the Democrat, using the voice of, as he puts it, a “ghetto black guy.” He also called union households, using voices with thick Spanish accents.

A Tale of Political Dirty Tricks Makes the Case for Election Reform

Posted by: b | Jan 1 2008 9:21 utc | 1

Happy New Year. Let’s hope that the new year brings some better news than last year.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jan 1 2008 10:19 utc | 2

b,
a nation whose voters are so susceptible to an automated voice or a stranger phoning them up deserves whatever sort of mess it eventually elects.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Jan 1 2008 12:07 utc | 3

Robocalls:
Even if you always hang up – as I do – you still can be manipulated. As the article quoted points out – repeated harassing phone calls with the intent of making you upset at the person harassing you can be used to cause people to switch votes. If one candidate impersonates another then it can be extremely difficult to even realise that you have been had.
You didn’t say it b – but at first glance I wasn’t sure. I don’t think I would want to condemn people for actually listing to robocalls.
Ralphieboy – it is really tempting to think that the US deserves what it gets, and that individuals get what they deserve – and it feels good to think this at some level it is unfair. I know that I can be manipulated if people try hard enough and are clever enough. It is the same with the 419 scams. Some people believe that they are helping someone who is dying of cancer. Ok so they are gullible. I think that it is cruel to believe that gullible people deserve to be hurt.
Let us really hope that not every person gets what they deserve, and let us hope that not every country gets what they deserve.

Posted by: edwin | Jan 1 2008 16:39 utc | 4

An Impure Place In The Middle Of Idolatry
PTSD, racism, child soldiers, untermenschen, the works.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601102&sid=a12JnKt1Pwlc&refer=uk
Not letting kids be kids, you end up worse than you began with.

Posted by: shanks | Jan 1 2008 17:32 utc | 5

USAID employee and Sudanese driver shot dead in an attack that “occurred around 4 a.m. local time as the car was heading to a western suburb of Sudan’s capital, Khartoum.”
US diplomat killed in Sudan shooting

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 1 2008 18:11 utc | 6

b and all,
Just a small note wondering what the status of typepad is with MOA posters. I had trouble again yesterday. Are others still having their posts withheld as spam sometimes? Is this creating more work for you b by having to put the posts back on that have been withheld?

Posted by: Rick | Jan 1 2008 18:13 utc | 7

b and all,
Thanks for all you do. I really should post here more often — but I read here every day. I’ll try to give back a bit more in the coming year.
Someone e-mail Billmon and tell him to let us know how he is doing.
Happy New Year to all; if it is possible.

Posted by: bucky | Jan 1 2008 21:29 utc | 8

I read here every day. I’ll try to give back a bit more in the coming year.
yeah bucky! please do. i am the queen of nothing comments (well, me and my true love ms beq). don’t be shy.

Posted by: annie | Jan 2 2008 6:04 utc | 9

If the USAid guy was truly a diplomat, he would have had an armed escort. The USAid diplomat in Afghanistan was a former oil executive, and traveled with a Stryker in front, and in back, full battle rattle, riding in an armored Toyota. Of course, with
all that backup, (the diplomat) was never on time to any minister-level meetings! : )
So either Sudan is not important to the Halliban, or John got sacrificed for a GW4.
Judging from a lack of response from US SecDef, SecState and CiC, John was wasted.
Maybe they’ll hang his portrait in the staff conference at Ronald Reagan Building.
Quite sad for Abdel-Rahman Abbas’s family, who will receive no death compensation.
Really tragic to think how many John’s & Abdel’s, GW’s $183B tax grift will spawn, designated as it is, for, “other unspecified national security purposes.”

Posted by: Dossi Wallups | Jan 2 2008 6:11 utc | 10

Looking back over the past year, and in case you’ve forgotten how craven these jackals are:
Pesticides & Human Experimentation

Government Bush EPA approved experimentation using pesicides on babies & children.

Of course, not to mention they manipulate poor people into subjecting themselves to poison for money. I started noticing this in my own college paper. Seems it started under the Bush admin, giving cash for poor students as ginna pigs for research.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 2 2008 6:45 utc | 11

@Rick – 7 –
A few comments still get marked as spam and I release them manually at least twice a day. They are from specific person for whatever reason – I guess that once the spam system thinks someone posts spam, all following comments are also tagged.
I have currently no way to avoid that except untagging them by hand. Please be patient – at least no comments get lost anymore.

Posted by: b | Jan 2 2008 7:47 utc | 12

This Cryptome Crytpo AG is already known, but may be of interest. One wonders, for example, about the alleged link to the trial for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 903 (the Lockerbie disaster).

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jan 2 2008 7:47 utc | 13

Stonewalled by the C.I.A.

As a legal matter, it is not up to us to examine the C.I.A.’s failure to disclose the existence of these tapes. That is for others. What we do know is that government officials decided not to inform a lawfully constituted body, created by Congress and the president, to investigate one the greatest tragedies to confront this country. We call that obstruction.
Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton served as chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the 9/11 commission.

Posted by: b | Jan 2 2008 7:48 utc | 14

“The Year In Evidence”
Well if this isn’t just a massive cataloguing of Bushco crimes for 2007 alone. Published by AfterDowningStreet.org, it categorizes a mind-numbing and infuriating list of the evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors of Bushco’s last year:
I say “mind-numbing” because, well, it’s almost like an immediate hit of “scandal fatigue”. A person could spend days just reading through all these links.
I clicked on one, almost at random, and came across the following:
Bush Family War Profiteering

Since this war on terror was declared following 9/11, the pay levels for the CEOs of the top 34 defense contractors have doubled. The average compensation rose from $3.6 million during the period of 1998-2001, to $7.2 million during the period of 2002-2005, according to an August 2006, report entitled, “Executive Excess 2006,” by the Washington-based, Institute for Policy Studies, and the Boston-based, United for a Fair Economy.
This study found that since 9/11, the 34 defense CEOs have pocketed a combined total of $984 million, or enough, the report says, to cover the wages for more than a million Iraqis for a year. In 2005, the average total compensation for the CEOs of large US corporations was only 6% above 2001 figures, while defense CEOs pay was 108% higher.
But the last name of one family, which is literally amassing a fortune over the backs of our dead heroes, matches that of the man holding the purse strings in the White House. On December 11, 2003, the Financial Times reported that three people had told the Times that they had seen letters written by Neil Bush that recommended business ventures in the Middle East, promoted by New Bridges Strategies, a firm set up by President Bush’s former campaign manager, who quit his Bush appointed government job as the head of FEMA, three weeks before the war in Iraq began.
Neil Bush was paid an annual fee to “help companies secure contracts in Iraq,” the Times said.
But Neil Bush is by no means the only Bush profiting from the war on terror. The first President Bush is so entangled with entities that have profited greatly that it’s difficult to even know where to begin. Bush joined the Carlyle Group in 1993, and became a member of the firm’s Asian Advisory Board.
The Carlyle Group was best known for buying defense companies and doubling or tripling their value and was already heavily supported by defense contracts. But in 2002, the firm received $677 million in government contracts, and by 2003, its contracts were worth $2.1 billion.
Prior to 9/11, some Carlyle companies were not doing so well. For instance, the future of Vought Aircraft looked dismal when the company laid off 20% of its employees. But business was booming shortly after the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq began, and the company received over $1 billion in defense contracts.
The Bush family’s connections to the Osama bin Laden’s family seem almost surreal. On September 28, 2001, two weeks after 9/11, the Wall Street Journal reported that, “George H.W. Bush, the father of President Bush, works for the bin Laden family business in Saudi Arabia through the Carlyle Group, an international consulting firm.”
As a representative of Carlyle, one of the investors that Bush brought to Carlyle was the Bin Laden Group, a construction company owned by Osama’s family. The bin Ladens have been called the Rockefellers of the Middle East, and the father, Mohammed, has reportedly amassed a $5 billion empire. According the Journal, Bush convinced Shafiq bin Laden to invest $2 million with Carlyle.
The Journal found that Bush had met with the bin Ladens at least twice between 1998 and 2000. On September 27, 2001, the Journal reported that it had confirmed that a meeting took place between Bush Senior and the bin Laden family through Senior’s Chief of Staff, Jean Becker, but only after the reporter showed her a thank you note that was written and sent by Bush to the bin Ladens after the meeting.
The current President’s little publicized affiliation with the bin Laden family goes back to his days with Arbusto oil when Salem bin Laden funneled money through James Bath to bail out that particular failed company.
Probably the most eerie report about this strange group of bedfellows is that on 9/11, the day that served as a kick-off for the highly profitable war on terror, Shafiq bin Laden attended a meeting in the office of the Carlyle Group, and stood watching TV with other members of the firm as the WTC collapsed.
The fact that so many Saudis, including many bin Ladens, were allowed to fly out of the country right after 9/11, while Americans were still grounded, has always seemed a bit strange to most people also, especially when nobody in the Bush administration was able to explain who gave permission for the flights.
About a month after 9/11, in October 2001, the Carlyle Group severed its ties with the Bin Laden Group, but the Bush family did not. In January 2002, Neil Bush took a trip to Saudi Arabia that was sponsored by the Bin Laden Construction Company and Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, the same Prince who offered New York Mayor, Rudy Giuliani $10 million to help the 9/11 victims, a gesture that Rudy refused.
In the fall of 2003, Bush Senior finally resigned from the Carlyle Group as the accusations of family war profiteering grew louder. However, according to the Washington Post, he still retained stock in the firm and gave speeches on its behalf for a fee of $500,000.
Carlyle companies have also scored big in the Homeland Security bonanza. Federal Data Systems and US Investigations Services hold multi-billion- dollar contracts to provide background checks for airlines, the Pentagon, the CIA and the Department of Homeland Security. US Investigations used to be a federal agency, until it was privatized in 1996 and taken over by Carlyle.
Marvin and Jeb Bush are also highly successful members of the family war profiteering team. Marvin is a co-founder and partner in Winston Partners, a private investment firm, and Jeb is an investor in the Winston Capital Fund, which is managed by Marvin.
Winston Partners is part of the Chatterjee Group, which owned 5.5 million shares in a company called Sybase in 2001, a firm that had contracts worth $2.9 million with the Navy, $1.8 million with the Army and $5.3 million with the Department of Defense. All totaled, the federal procurement database listed the firm’s contracts that year as $14,754,000.
And, Sybase was not the only company delivering war profits to Marvin and Jeb. The portfolio of Winston Partners also included the Amsec Corp, which, in 2001, was awarded $37,722,000 in Navy contracts.
Marvin’s business partner, Scott Andrews, sat on the board of directors at AMSEC, and the company’s CEO was Michael Braham, who formerly worked for Paul Bremer, the leader of the Coalition Provisional Authority responsible for handing out contracts Iraq.
This is the same Paul Bremer who used Iraqi money from the Development Fund for Iraq to award 5 no-bid contracts to Dick Cheney’s cash cow, Halliburton, worth $222 million, $325 million, $180 million, and $194 million combined for the last two, according to a July 28, 2004, report by the CPA Inspector General Stuart Bowen, entitled, “Comptroller Cash Management Controls over the Development Fund for Iraq.”
As it turns out, Halliburton received 60% of all contracts paid for with Iraqi money. In a January 2005 report, Inspector Bowen concluded that occupation authorities accounted poorly for $8.8 billion in Iraqi funds, and said, “The CPA did not implement adequate financial controls.”
The President’s uncle, William (Bucky) Bush, is the most visible war profiteer on the team. He sat on the board of a major military contractor called Engineered Support Systems. Six months before the war in Iraq began, on September 16, 2002, CNN/Money Magazine called ESS one of “seven defense stocks that fund managers like,” and one fund manager said ESS was one of two companies that “would gain the most from a war from Iraq.”
As a director, Uncle William received a monthly fee and held stock options. In January 2003, before the Iraq war began, he owned 33,750 shares of stock, but a year later, in January 2004, he owned 56,251.
The fact that Uncle William had an inside line to the White House can hardly be disputed. On March 25, 2003, Bush asked Congress for funding, “to cover military operations, relief and reconstruction activities in Iraq, and ongoing operations in the global war on terrorism,” and the very next day, ESS announced a large order from the Army for its Chemical Biological Protected Shelter systems.
Uncle William has become a very rich man since his nephew took office. In January 2005, SEC filings show that he made about $450,000 by selling ESS stock. But he did even better the next year.
According to the Excess Report, through a series of defense contracts, ESS earnings reached record levels and set the stage for the sale of the firm to another defense contractor, DRS Technologies, in January 2006, and among the beneficiaries of the deal was Uncle William, who cleared $2.7 million in cash and stock off the sale.
Its time for Congress to stop the direct deposits of tax dollars into the Bush bank accounts. Lawmakers need to notify the White House that all funding for Iraq is done, other than what is needed for the immediate removal of our troops from this disgusting war profiteering scheme.
(For a detailed account of war profiteering by the Bush Family see Jeffrey St. Clair’s Grand Theft Pentagon.)
Evelyn Pringle is an investigative reporter. She can be reached at: epringle05@yahoo.com

And this is just ONE link out of a score of them, from ONE category out of SIXTEEN!
I just had to share it here in the hopes that we can help spread this around.
The blockquote above paints one of the best pictures I’ve ever seen of the group piracy, the sheer mass looting of the United States, that has taken place because of this gang. And they are, in fact, a gang, a crime syndicate.
Imagine what their political “opponents” could have done with this, IF THERE WERE ANY.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 2 2008 8:05 utc | 15

@ b 14: This link might merit its own thread, perhaps with the title
“Co-chairs of 9-11 Commission join the conspiracy theorists” ,
since the lines quoted above amount to an allegation of a conspiracy to obstruct justice within the top ranks of the U.S. government. Nor is this the first time they have indicated that there was something amiss in the investigation conducted by that commission. As in the case of the newly rivivified “Impeach Cheney” movement, once again one can hardly resist the sensation that Kean and Hamilton have perceived some sort of elitist “green light”, and are acting on that perception. It may be that they are ready to engage in what amounts to a public “mea culpa” in order to elevate their image from the present level of “useful idiots” or “unwilling dupes” to that of “well-intentioned public servants lead astray” by the “conspirators”. (The absence of Philip Zelikow’s endorsement for this shift is striking.) It seems, with a bit bit of charity, that Kean and Hamilton acted in what they construed as the best interests of the United States: it is only too easy to observe that they confused these with the best interests of the U.S. government (quite a different entity), and in fact have acted heretofore in the best interests of the hard core national security establishment within that government, again, something quite other than the greater entity it purports to defend.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jan 2 2008 8:45 utc | 16

He is as guilty as sin, but after 22 years in the slammer, I believe that it’s past time to allow him to go to his chosen country.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jan 2 2008 9:02 utc | 17

Sure, Hannah — they let Vannanu go to his chosen country and we let Pollard go to his.
BTW, I assume every one knows that the Pakistan gov’t is now turning 180 degrees on a dime as to what caused BB’s death. But the link just in case

Posted by: Chuck Cliff | Jan 2 2008 10:09 utc | 18

The empire is starting to crumble from within. The Lakotah people secede from the USA

…The self-determination of the Lakotah now takes on powerful meeting as the Lakotah Freedom Delegation traveled to Washington D.C. and withdrew the Lakotah from their treaties with the United States Government. The ride becomes an outward expression of sovereign Lakotah rights and spirituality.
Tegihya Kte said, “We don’t want the government telling us what to do, we want to be free.”
Lakotah Freedom delegate and Cante Tenza leader Canupa Gluha Mani (Duane Martin Sr.) agreed, “The Lakotah withdrawal in Washington D.C. brings real protection for our people today, exactly the real protection Big Foot sought for his people then.”
We are the freedom loving Lakotah from the Sioux Indian reservations of Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana who have withdrawn from the constitutionally mandated treaties to become a free and independent country. We are alerting the Family of Nations we have now reassumed our freedom and independence with the backing of Natural,International, and United States law.

Posted by: Juan Moment | Jan 2 2008 10:24 utc | 19

@ Chuck Cliff
I wonder if Mordecai V. would like to meet Cindy again, just for old times’ sake. In fact, releasing Pollard might be a lever to get Vanunu out of Israel, although I certainly wouldn’t bet on that since it seems to be at the bottom of the priority list for any “serious” presidential candidate, not to mention the incumbent criminals.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jan 2 2008 11:23 utc | 20

Every time I see a story about cops doing good I want to think “most of them are good and it’s just a few bad apples” WE KNOW FROM APPLES EH? ….out rolls another story like this….you would think the Empire/police state would better control the media to keep us positive on the Gestapo…but that would be to logical, as Monolycus said long ago,(paraphrasing), ‘they want you to know these things’. They depend on it.
You knowing the nefarious things they do helps promote their authoritarian agenda. It’s systemic, and meant specifically to demoralize and defeat you. To terrorizes you. To give them power over you.
Both at home and abroad.
That they have cadres of U.S. Behavioral Specialists. To herd you into their mental gulag. Is their role.
I just got around to finishing John Deans book, Conservatives without Conscience, and as wikipedia says, “The book makes extensive use of the research into Right-wing Authoritarianism”.
And basically, that the “authoritarian” “social controller” personality is what drives them on all levels to be proactively as nasty and rough and most importantly, as creative in their destruction of liberal democracy as they can be. They are the ones who hate our freedom. Yhey are ‘Snakes in Suits’.
Both republican and democrat; a pecking order of cowards, Liars, snakes and thieves. And you must know your place in the order of things.
And at the top, hierarchically, as I have said before, we are all caught between a mafia and a elite cabal.
The former Nixon counsel John Dean explains a largely unknown 50 year academic study. The data shows that conservatives are much more likely to follow authoritarian leaders. In other words, they are followers, not leaders.
Which largely explains why the democrats do nothing, BECAUSE THEY ARE IN REALITY RIGHT OF CENTER CONSERVATIVES, and or complicit. Because the system has been set up since the seventies to methodically weed out progressives, unless they play their role as gatekeepers.
A little noticed news of late, of would-be Ford assassin, Sara Jane Moore now 77, was released on parole from a federal prison in California today. Moore tried to assassinate President Ford in 1975. She pleaded guilty and was sentenced to life in prison.
Sara Jane Moore, who tried to kill Ford in ’75, freed on parole

Sara Jane Moore, the self-styled radical who earned an infamous role in the parlous politics of 1970s America by trying to assassinate President Gerald Ford in San Francisco, was paroled Monday from a Bay Area federal prison after serving more than 30 years, a spokesman for the federal Bureau of Prisons said.

Interesting factoids:
according to the SFGate (above)she was also working for the FBI at the time of the crime, as well as, a volunteer bookkeeper by proxy for the Symbionese Liberation Army e.g., Patty Hearst/”tania”.
But I digress, morally right or wrong left in her actions, she was correct about one thing, ‘Moore said that she was convinced at the time that the government had declared war on the left’.
Seemingly, unbeknownst to her, she saw at least that clearly at the time. They won that war too. And here we are today three decades later;no opposition to speak of still.
In recent interviews, Moore said she regretted her actions.
“I am very glad I did not succeed. I know now that I was wrong to try,” Moore said a year ago in an interview with KGO-TV.
I wonder what her nic on the Daily Kos gatekeeper will be…lol
This further, also explains, why there is no “opposition” to these crooks. Which means everyone is either in on the crime, or else those who would normally oppose are actually to scared to say anything. You know, who wants to get anthraxed, or stay out of small planes for the rest of their lives …
Generational incrementalism, and the ratcheting to the right.
Dean comes close in some ways at really getting at the root of the problem we face as a people – that individuals that lack a conscience in any form have taken control of the US government and its people. Dean uses the research of a social psychologist, Bob Altemeyer, to explain the traits of these individuals – authoritarians or people that have social dominance orientation, but stops short of what we are really dealing with – sociopaths or psychopaths. These sociopaths or psychopaths don’t care about you or me. They don’t have a conscience or an ability to empathize for others. They only care about keeping control and power.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 2 2008 11:26 utc | 21

The internal struggle for the Iraqi oil law continues

A year has passed since the landmark deadline of December 2006, which was ‘publicly’ imposed by the IMF, the Iraqi Study Group (ISG), the US administration and the International Oil companies (IOCs) on the Iraqi government to deliver the long awaited Iraqi oil law.
But it still seems that we are no closer today to seeing the new law approved than we were back in December 2006.
In an August 22, 2007 “What is holding up the delivery of the long-awaited Iraqi oil law,” I covered the history, the background and the political developments surrounding the controversy over the Oil Law, including all the external and internal factors behind the delays in its materialization.
I concluded that internal Iraqi factors were the main causes behind the hold-up of the new oil law.
The developments on the ground over the past four months proved the accuracy of this analysis. Therefore, this article should be read in conjunction with the earlier analysis and should be seen as a further step in bringing the debate surrounding the oil law up-to-date.
The Iraqi dynamics behind all the delays in the approval of the oil law have become more and more obvious over the previous few months. Their role in setting back the delivery of the oil law is becoming accepted by many International and by most Iraqi oil experts and analysts as the key factors bringing the progress on the oil law to a halt, as well as bringing some changes to US tactics on this benchmark.
In this analysis, I will cover the various internal Iraqi factors in more detail, as they have developed over the past few months.

Munir Chalabi is an Iraqi political and oil analyst living in the UK

Posted by: b real | Jan 2 2008 16:00 utc | 22

Oil finally made 100 today:
Oil futures rise to $100 a barrel

Oil prices soared to $100 a barrel Wednesday for the first time ever, reaching that milestone amid an unshakeable view that global demand for oil and petroleum products will continue to outstrip supplies.

Posted by: b | Jan 2 2008 18:05 utc | 23

hannah, yes, good posts –
these 9/11 commission types and others are just servants, and when the wind blows mildly from another direction, they read the polls too, they grow doubts, and hedge and pontificate, pretend to surprise and scratch their heads and let a few snippets escape. They count on the short memory, or none, of the public, induced by the media. Go with the flow… still the 9/11 truth movement, sloppy as it may be, has had unexpected impact. What it will lead to down the road is not much, sadly.
Americans hate their Govmt. -libertarians, bitchers, left wingers, identity issue types, many who spout freedom but are supported by the State, etc., the poor have checked out – but as long as it keeps those who have a voice in housing and cars and lording it, their criticism is mere opinion, narcissistic sounding off with no impact.
(Core or ‘old’ EU countries play good cop with magisterial and unabashed hypocrisy.)
Kadafi grossed out Sarkozy and the French public with his heated tents and retinue and truthful (from his pov) statements. Sweet revenge, I guess, in his mind, for Lockerbie. Sins washed away – giving up arms – now, with France at the head of that crowd, a legitimate business partner. (Energy and Energy again.) The incarceration of the Nurses was a riposte, and it worked..

Posted by: Tangerine | Jan 2 2008 18:16 utc | 24

AFRICOM propaganda squad sighting
letter to the editor of the free-lance star in fredricksburg, virginia — Mission of AFRICOM misconstrued in op-ed

Regarding their recent op-ed [“The Pentagon should stay out of Africa,” Dec. 14], I am afraid Danny Glover and Nicole Lee are victims of misinformation about U.S. Africa Command.
AFRICOM is not part of a “U.S. military expansion,” nor will it involve placing many “American troops on foreign soil.” Rather, AFRICOM marks recognition of the growing importance of Africa and reallocates responsibility for U.S. security interests accordingly.

People might also be surprised to know that most U.S. military activities in Africa, even before AFRICOM, involve things other than “normal” military operations, such as support to HIV/AIDS education, environmental security cooperation, and community relations activities such as digging wells or building schools.
Duncan Lang Spotsylvania

not only does the letter read like straight PR — exactly how is creating & staffing a new combatant command not “expansion”? — the author fails to mention his occupation which, in the interests of fairness, contributes to the reader’s misinformation on the subject at hand.
from linked in:

Duncan Lang’s Experience
*Africa Desk Officer Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics)
January 2001 — Present

Posted by: b real | Jan 2 2008 19:47 utc | 25

Another day late, dollar short media confessional:
John Hockenberry

Posted by: biklett | Jan 2 2008 21:21 utc | 26

b real,
speaking of AFRICOM. Do you see that playing a role in the messy aftermath to the Kenyan election?

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Jan 2 2008 22:11 utc | 27

@26,
Africom’s main interest is the oil in the Gulf of Guinea (Nigeria, Eq. Guinea, Cameroons, Sao-Tome, and Angola a little further south but all on the West Coast. Kenya is on the East Coast and suitably serves operations in the Horn. Still its all Africom.
however, there is opposition to USA’s Africom agenda in Kenya. Its definitely a major issue but not very visible. The election mess can only sharpen it.
Kenya is a very very complex country with a legacy that is in some ways more reminiscent of South-Africa/Zimbabwe/Namibia than its neighbors Tanzania/Uganda/Somalia.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Jan 2 2008 23:59 utc | 28

askod – there’s a strong u.s. interest in kibaki over odinga. see b’s “Foot In Mouth?” thread from a couple days ago & my comments there. while not necessarily AFRICOM — which has training wheels on for the time being and, anyway, CENTCOM still holds control over CJTF-HOA and that AOR — i’m sure that the u.s. has already played a role in events there. did they help rig the elections? there’s no proof yet that i’ve come upon, but the signals were there that they’d support kibaki whatever it took. kenya is a crucial player in u.s. interests. has very strong military relations w/ the u.s. and is a key buffer state — so far — against political islam. according to some experts, the only truly threatening AQ presence on the continent is in kenya.
on the role during and post-conflict, well, kibaki originally had the paramilitaries out, who were most likely trained by u.s. forces, given the large military-to-military training programs there but now the kenyan military has been deployed in some districts and it’s a good bet that, in addition to using u.s.-supplied equipment, the us — consultants at a minimum — are involved in at least some capacity. and it’s probably seen as too good of a real-time lab for counterterrorism (CT) and humanitarian assistance (HA) theory-into-practice operations.
AFRICOM itself is in no capacity to drive or supply anything at this point, from what i’ve read. a recent CSIS paper mentioned that the pentagon is now hedging on the oct 2008 date for a full standup.

Posted by: b real | Jan 3 2008 0:01 utc | 29

thanks,
knew it had to have been parsed out here. 🙂

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Jan 3 2008 1:54 utc | 30

also, Africom is regional branding as in Disney LA/Paris/Orlando/Tokyo. Mickey, Donald & Goofy, say hello to sunny Africa.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Jan 3 2008 3:23 utc | 31

on the story in kenya, thinking a bit more (wildly, perhaps) on what askod asked — would it be too cynical to imagine for a moment that the ‘genocide’ hyperbole & constant press evocation of the imagery of rwanda from more than a decade ago allows the u.s. military an opportunity to “get it right” this time & repair a badly damaged reputation that the iraq albatross has currently wrought?

Posted by: b real | Jan 3 2008 4:11 utc | 32

I’m starting to wonder if in resisting MSM ‘tools’, MoA don’t risk becoming ones too.
For a New Years Resolution, I’m going to try something on Open Threads. Every day I make an effort to talk with someone ‘on the street’. Half the time it doesn’t work,
but sometimes you get the craziest (good) conversations. So here’s a latest teaser:
Guitar Hero (Wii/XBox video game) is extremely addicting. Most people who are good musicians aren’t good at Guitar Hero, it’s different fretting. But there is at least one person who’s a practicing guitarist AND a world-class Guitar Hero points scorer!
I did not know that! : )

Posted by: Querna Voca | Jan 3 2008 7:56 utc | 33

@31,
a big issue with any attempt to “get it right” is the massive corporitazion that prevails. And this equally applies to post-Katrina New Orleans too.
now if all aids-workers (bosses & big-wigs too) to Africa were put on a maximum $20K annual salary (tax free), equipped with a duffel bag, a little tent (bug-screens), a bag of beef-jerky (for non-vegans), canned food, a camp-stove …, and required to live within the communities they are assisting (no Hiltons, no air-conditioned SUV’s, no schmoozing with privileged locals, …), we would see tremendous jumps in the cost-benefits & actual value of aid provided, as well as a tremendous leap in appreciation. Such spartan sacrifice would not be a big deal for some existing aids groups, especially those involved in less glamorous sectors — (agriculture, sanitation, clean-water). At which point, the USA/West would have given China a big big problem to worry about.
on the military front, Kenya has very little oil (as far as is generally known, which could change). And Kenyans will scrutinize any military intervention with great skepticism. And USA does not have a surplus of boots to spare. Hence the ROI does not look great. Of course, theres always the dividends-of-chaos theory.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Jan 3 2008 11:34 utc | 34

This is what is propagandized as a “two state solution”
Jerusalem seeks Bush okay for IDF free hand in West Bank

Israel would like the U.S. to agree to a number of limitations on the future Palestinian state’s sovereignty. Israel wants Palestine to be completely demilitarized, and for Israel to be able to fly over Palestinian air space. Border crossings would be monitored by Israel in such a way that the symbols of Palestinian sovereignty would not be compromised, but Israel would know who was coming and going.
Israel is to propose the deployment of an international force in the West Bank and along the Philadelphi Route in Rafah, and would ask that a permanent Israel Defense Forces presence remain for an extended period in the Jordan Valley.
Jordan Valley ‘tripwire force’
According to Israel’s plan, a small Israeli force would be stationed in the Jordan Valley as a “tripwire force” that would act as a deterrent. Israel would also demand Palestinian agreement that in the case of an emergency Israel could deploy in essential areas of the West Bank to thwart a threat of invasion from the East.

Posted by: b | Jan 3 2008 12:40 utc | 35

The US Election is Already Over. Murder and Preventable Death Have Won.
Wow! Just tuned in to todays Democracy Now and was SERIOUSLY impressed with the guests Allan Nairn and Kelley Beaucar Vlahos who wrote, “War Whisperers”. I had never heard of Allan Nairn before, but man he floored me with his analysis, for example,

AMY GOODMAN: Are you saying that there’s no difference between these candidates?
ALLAN NAIRN: Well, fundamentally, there’s no difference on the basic principle of, are you against the killing of civilians and are you willing to enforce the murder laws. If we were willing to enforce the murder laws, the headquarters of each of these candidates could be raided, and various advisers and many candidates could be hauled away by the cops, because they have backed various actions that, under established principles like the Nuremberg Principles, like the principles set up in the Rwanda tribunals, the Bosnia tribunals, things that are unacceptable, like aggressive war, like the killing of civilians for political purposes. So, in a basic sense, there is no choice.
But there is a difference in this sense: the US is so vastly powerful, the US influences and has the potential to end so many millions of lives around the world, that if, let’s say, you have two candidates that are 99% the same—there’s only 1% difference between them—if you’re talking about decisions that affect a million lives—1% of a million is 10,000—that’s 10,000 lives. So, even though it’s a bitter choice, if you choose the one who is going to kill 10,000 fewer people, well, then you’ve saved 10,000 lives. We shouldn’t be limited to that choice. It’s unacceptable. And Americans should start to realize that it’s unacceptable.
But that’s the choice we have at the moment. In Iowa, I think there are steps people could take to start to challenge that system, if they wanted to.

The above rush transcript doesn’t fully convey the depth of issues he brought up and covered so I would suggest watching or listening to it for the behind the scenes info on the candidates. It was very enlightening.
These two really pulled the curtains back on the role of the policy advisor’s who are working for and with the sorry choices we have, hence the first link above. No matter whom you vote for or who wins, Murder Inc. moves right along.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 3 2008 18:41 utc | 36

w is pissed at Makasey for investigating the CIA tapes destruction

President George W. Bush tried to stop Attorney General Michael Mukasey from launching a criminal investigation into the Central Intelligence Agency’s destruction of tapes showing torture of a prisoner and has ordered top White House officials to stonewall the probe, Capitol Hill Blue has learned.
Bush is reportedly “livid” that Makasey went ahead with the investigation and even discussed firing the attorney general but senior administration officials talked the President out of taking an action that would add fuel to suspicions of a cover-up.
While the administration may put on a public face of cooperation, the White House will take a tough stance from prosecutors who will seek interviews with current and former administration officials who participated in a meeting where destruction of the videotapes was discussed.

Posted by: dan of steele | Jan 3 2008 22:35 utc | 37

agreed, uncle. it was good of democracynow, through the guests, to point this aspect of the candidacies out. most of those names the lady reeled off should be accompanied w/ mug shots & cell numbers (not talking mobile phones, either). you’ve definitely heard of nairn before. he’s the guy that saved amy’s life in dili during that indonesian army massacre of unarmed timorese. he’s on the program quite a bit. prob three times in the past few months. on the bitter choice, chomsky has been making that point for years.

Posted by: b real | Jan 3 2008 22:42 utc | 38

dan re post §37 – by this stage of the game – this particular administration is so criminal, so treasonous – i do not trust in the least what is left of that torn & dirty rag they once called jurisprudence

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 3 2008 23:15 utc | 39

If the US wants to do a goodwill operation to pull the light of Iraq and so on supporting the government side in Kenya would not require any boots as the Kenyan government would provide the ground troops. With US providing air support.
But it does not look like that is what is unfolding, what with the US joining the calls for recount.

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Jan 4 2008 0:00 utc | 40

The fish in the Simpsons seem to be for real.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jan 4 2008 0:18 utc | 41

World Bank Report that may come in handy:
Who are the net food importing countries?

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 4 2008 0:35 utc | 42

Not related to any other topic, but it is good for the spirit. Insider’s account of the latest workers’ strike in Egypt.
The Organiser

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 4 2008 0:49 utc | 43

Had a quick look at the World Bank report and though it is a good source for some stats, I lacked what I was looking for. I figured it would have some numbers on amount of food (tons, litres) that countries import and export. It would give some grasp on what regions will be in for a tough time with rising transport costs.
But being a bank they only count how much people pay for the food imports/exports.

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Jan 4 2008 0:51 utc | 44

Dahr Jamail on Iraq
A slap in the face for Parliament
(As an aside, Al Ahram’s Iraq correspondent cites the director of Iraq’s National Command Centre as saying, “that the Ministry of Interior lost 18,200 of its policemen this year, 60 per cent of whom died in Baghdad.”)

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 4 2008 17:50 utc | 45

Britain’s key weapon in Afghanistan: the bribe

The Christmas day arrests and subsequent expulsions from Afghanistan of two top Western diplomats – Michael Semple, the Irish acting head of the European Union mission, and Mervyn Patterson, a British diplomat working for the United Nations – have highlighted the lack of any long-term political strategy behind international intervention in Afghanistan.
The Afghan government alleges that Semple and Patterson were trying to buy off local Taliban in Musa Qala, the town retaken by NATO forces in December.
(snip)
The expulsions suggest that rather than relying on either military or political solutions, the key British weapon in the ‘war’ against the Taliban has been the bribe. Afghan officials allege that the expelled British and Irish nationals had $150,000 (£75,000) with them, for the purpose of buying the support of a local Taliban leader; they also claim to have found data on the officials’ laptops showing they had made previous payments to him.
(snip)
Despite the seeming consensus at home, opposition to the British policy of bribing the Taliban has come from the Afghan government and the United States. According to the Daily Telegraph, the Afghan government acted on the advice and information of US intelligence services who were unhappy with the high level of support the British were providing to the Taliban, which included direct financial as well as other forms of support, including food and mobile phone cards.
(snip)

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 4 2008 17:54 utc | 46

Servility loves company. The NewYork Times happily announces:
Al Jazeera No Longer Nips at Saudis

(snip)
For the past three months Al Jazeera, which once infuriated the Saudi royal family with its freewheeling newscasts, has treated the kingdom with kid gloves, media analysts say.
The newly cautious tone appears to have been dictated to Al Jazeera’s management by the rulers of Qatar, where Al Jazeera has its headquarters. Although those rulers established the channel a decade ago in large part as a forum for critics of the Saudi government, they now seem to feel they cannot continue to alienate Saudi Arabia — a fellow Sunni nation — in light of the threat from Iran across the Persian Gulf.
The specter of Iran’s nuclear ambitions may be particularly daunting to tiny Qatar, which also is the site of a major American military base.
The new policy is the latest chapter in a gradual domestication of Al Jazeera, once reviled by American officials as little more than a terrorist propaganda outlet. Al Jazeera’s broadcasts no longer routinely refer to Iraqi insurgents as the “resistance,” or victims of American firepower as “martyrs.”
(snip)

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 4 2008 17:58 utc | 47

thanks alamet for this last link – it explains a great deal. at the moment aljazeera has a truly execrable coverge of latin america where only one year ago it was the most enlightened
money does not talk – it swears

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 4 2008 18:58 utc | 48

A few days ago on Open Thread 07-85, Uncle $cam posted a link concerning the increasing cost of food in the U.S. I followed his link with a discussion concerning how the cost of fertilizer (energy related) will have a significant impact on World food prices. Also, I discussed alternative ways to thinking about crop production. Below is an article on the upcoming food price crunch. To repeat the major point of my earlier discussion, the most significant factor to high yields is high nitrogen fertilizer. Corn and soy, top U.S. agricultural products, are especially high users of nitrogen fertilizer. I wonder if with high fertilizer prices, some producers may opt for lower yields – how much so may be dependent upon thinking of where the optimum point of return may be and how much total investment a producer is willing to make.
Forget oil, the new global crisis is food

Posted by: Rick | Jan 4 2008 22:18 utc | 49

Could’a Had A V-8
“Sallie Mae, formally known as SLM Corp., said in a regulatory filing Thursday that it planned to “be more selective” in making student loans, both those backed by the federal government and the higher-rate private loans. The Reston, Va.-based company reaped a bonanza in recent years from the boom in student lending, with some 10 million customers, and around $25 billion in private student loans and $128 billion in government-backed loans outstanding.
In other words, instead of Congress grifting the American Halliban Neo-Zi’s $183B “for undisclosed national security purposes”, with a non-disclosure, non-auditable exemption, Congress could have instead, in one stroke, wiped out 100% of US student debt, and still had enough tax money left over to build TWENTY WORLD TRADE CENTERS.

Posted by: Rebecca Tamerlain | Jan 4 2008 22:19 utc | 50

on this day – meditating on the role of my sisters in this struggle i am reminded of the chinese slogan from the sixties –woman hold up half the sky
i realise that even tho i have been in for the long haul – i suffer from a certain impatience – & an inordinate addiction to action – & that what the indians taught us in their war against the english, what the algerians taught us in their war against the french & the vietnamese in their war against the united states – the demands of a very particular kind of patience – from where imagination comes & creates possibilities that empires cannot even contemplate. for example – giap’s use of bees, of the body odor of soldiers – i mean many natural & organic methods of opposition that ended up being implacable
we are living in times equally as dark as those of 1933 – 1945 – & fascism threatens us both in the day to day life, the present & the possible futures which are oppressively dark
we witness today how powerless the empire is against the events that are taking place all over the world – normally that would be consoling but the fact is that imperialism has also created monsters – that are both a part of its downfall & a concern for our futures
the abject love of absolutes – & the mullahs whether they are a huckabee a blair or a rudd give me the fucking creeps – they are like psychopaths from some d rate californian movie from the late 70’s – with their creepy love of god & all the anserw he possesses – what it reveals, rather nakedly – for all their talk – is that they are ethicless, for all their supposed morality they are deeply immoral when it comes to the suffering of others – deeply immoral & corrupt
& that corruption goes very deeply – that moral corruption is in fact the muscle of the military industrial complex
& it will take all the patience of our sisters in struggle to defeat it

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 4 2008 23:13 utc | 51

& fuck if i hear ‘folks’ one more time i’ll start singing the hors wessel lieder

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 4 2008 23:15 utc | 52

So the amerikan chickens are coming home to roost for Musharraf. The sadly named International Crisis Group has just put out a press release to Reuters urging the amerikan government to pressure the Pakistan Army’s new boss General Ashfaq Kayani to, in the interests of democracy, of course, flick Musharraf in that old Pakistani democratic tradition where the army picks the prez!
Why would the Pakistan Army listen to amerika? Well military aid of course; since silly George’s dumb dogs drove OBL into Waziristan, military aid to Pakistan is up to $11 billion and counting. That old amerikan democratic tradition of money talks, bullshit walks means they feel the $11 billion gives them the right to pick Pakistan’s prez.
Who the hell is the International Crisis Group anyway and if they are European why is the call coming from amerika?
The Reuters article tells us “The ICG, which has been highly critical of Musharraf and has influence within the U.S. Congress . .
Sooooo they have pull in Congress, that must mean they are a democrat think tank doesn’t it? Their obviously self penned wikipedia entry tells us amongst other blather “The International Crisis Group is an international, non-profit, non-governmental organization whose mission is to prevent and resolve deadly conflicts through high-level advocacy.” meaningless babble which drops a few allegedly left of centre non-amerikan political names.
So Spinwatch should help lets see:

. . .”ICG is also supported by various foundations (covering 43%) – Rockefeller, Ford, MacArthur, US Institute for Peace (established by Ronald Reagan), Carnegie, Sarlo Jewish Community Endowment Fund, Hewlett, etc. and private sector donors (16%).
In short, major mainstream American policy-oriented foundations, none of which are known for spending just a fraction of their millions of dollars on grants that could result in building a knowledge base about, say, peace by peaceful means, non-violence and reconciliation. Neither have they promoted studies of why violent conflict-management and so-called humanitarian interventions – e.g. Kosovo – have failed so miserably since the end of the Cold War – let alone promoted criticism of the only superpower’s reckless militarist, unilateralist policies these years.
But let’s imagine the ideal world in which, year by year, more and more government funds would come with no strings attached whatsoever. Are non-governmental people leading ICG?
No, they are not. Among its board members we find Gareth Evans President & CEO, Former Foreign Minister of Australia and Lord Patten of Barnes, former European Commissioner for External Relations, Co-Chairman. Two pro-Kosovo-Albanian Americans, Morton Abramowitz, former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State and former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, Stephen Solarz, former U.S. Congressman. And George Soros. Among other names that catch the “independent, non-governmental” eye you find: ambassador Kenneth Adelman (US), Wesley Clark (former NATO-commander who lead the destruction of Yugoslavia in 1999) (US), Zbigniew Brzezinski, former U.S. National Security Advisor to the President, Ruth Dreifuss, former President, Switzerland, Leslie H. Gelb, former President of Council on Foreign Relations, U.S.
Among other former-governmentals: Bronislaw Geremek, former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Poland, Lena Hjelm-Wall?n, former Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Affairs Minister, Sweden, James C.F. Huang, Deputy Secretary General to the President, Taiwan, Fidel V. Ramos, former President of the Philippines, Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, former Secretary General of NATO; former Defence Secretary, UK, Salim A. Salim, former Prime Minister of Tanzania and former Secretary General of the Organisation of African Unity, P?r Stenback, former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Finland, Thorvald Stoltenberg, former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Norway, Ernesto Zedillo, former President of Mexico; Martti Ahtisaari, former President, Finland, George J. Mitchell, former U.S. Senate Majority Leader, Uffe Ellemann-Jensen, former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Denmark, and Mark Eyskens, former Prime Minister of Belgium.
In all fairness, there are also some business people, a novelist and a professor. But one can’t help being struck by a) the overwhelming presence of (former) politicians and diplomats, b) the virtual absence of people from academia with professional training in field conflict and peace work, and c) the degree of overlap between the governments that support the ICG and the governments these board member once served. . . .”

Soooo Stephen Solarz, Zbigniew Brzezinski and the inimitable George Soros, is that dem enough?
Not to mention big mobs of other claiming to be left of centre asshole self promoters fallen upon hard times eg Gareth never got to be Oz PM Evans, the scum who advocate the deaths of millions and call it progress.
So if this mob, trying to appear to be a non-governmental think tank, or policy wonk-out, or whatever, is calling for Mush’s ouster, does that mean they have also come to the conclusion that it was the General(Rtd.) who got B.B.?
Hard to say but they must have their suspicions cause otherwise they would be sticking with what they know in Pakistan. Sure they’ve lined up the ever lubed asshole of Mohammadmian Soomro to fill in. The whole thing reeks of amerikan intervention, by picking the normally irrelevant Pakistani Senate prez to make it sound soothing to amerikan voters, “Hey Mabel, that’s just like we do things back home!” because of course Mabel and Bob need to be thinking healthcare and “the economy stupid”, not empire when they go into the polling booth at the end of the year.
Former Sindh state governor Mohammadmian Soomro must think all his Ramadans have come at once, even if the current Sindh governor has pulled Soomro’s pix from the official site leaving only his own and Mushie’s on the extremely brief Soomro bio page. Soomro grabbed a short stint as prez during the delay when Mush was organising a supreme court full of justices prepared to bend the constitution back in November. The fact he’s a Sindh means that the Bhutto’s probably found him acceptable then, though I wonder if they do now? New PPP co-chair Mr ten percent, aka Asif Ali Zardari is unlikely to see this attempt to blindside his machinations in a positive light. As a main-chancer from way back who was always kept at arms length even before the corruption charges “He’s not quite top drawer, don’tcha know”, Zadari will recognise the danger in allowing Soomro another bite of the prez cherry. It wouldn’t matter if Soomro won the job in a bar raffle, after two cracks of the whip, he’s go to begin to believe the job is his, and, that he’s the best man for it.
The fact that neither amerika nor Mush have a problem with Soomro also tends to suggest that everyone has a piece of his ass and he may not be content to keep the seat warm for Bilawal Bhutto Zardari the younger, for just long enough to lose the peach fuzz.
The wheels within wheels, the machinations become that much more complicated as soon as an outsider such as amerika becomes involved.
What should be a straight last man standing contest between Musharraf, Zadari, Nawaz Sharif and hopefully for Pakistan, Imran Khan,just turns into a complicated and unsatisfying shadow dance where no one will accrue enough power to make a difference and see Pakistan through the crisis generated by Musharraf and amerika.
Most importantly when Pakistan becomes an abstract problem, a plaything for assholes such as the board of the International Crisis Group, all humanity is lost.
Fatima Bhutto daughter of Murtaza Bhutto, who was B.B.’s younger brother and who was likely assassinated on Benazir’s orders, reminds us of that humanity when she remembers her aunt here with a page titled:- “Farewell to Wadi Bua – Our family has lost enough.
Gary Leup also makes some important points about the danger and cruelty of foreign interference in Pakistan with this CounterPunch article Madness Compounding Madness Calls for Intervention in Pakistan
Leupp makes some good points although he makes the same assumptions as virtually all of the pieces written by Pakistani ex-pats, in that he sees the appeal of Islamic fundamentalism as something which needs to be countered.
We tend to overlook the simple truth that the majority of those Pakistanis getting their opinions published come from one or both categories of either middle class secular intellectuals or established Pakistani political entities. The secularists loathe the idea of religion making a comeback while the politicians oppose any new political force they aren’t a part of.
Yet when I speak to ordinary Pakistani shit-kickers, the halal slaughtermen, small shopkeepers and self employed tradesmen who make up NZ’s ex-pat Pakistani population many of them see something quite different.
They are non-violent ie they don’t want Pakistan’s political impasse to be resolved through war or revolution or so-called terrorism, but they do see the national religion Islam, as being an essential common thread which holds all Pakistanis together. – Sindh, Pashtun, Punjabi, Baluch and Wazir to name a few of the more than 200 ethnicities of Pakistan who came together because of religion. Whether the force they joined together to overcome was political greed, or rejection by the Indian majority fired up after a couple of hundred years of British divide and rule is irrelevant in 2007.
The state may be artificially created, and relatively new (50 years old) but it does have an identity internally and externally – a ‘brand’ if you will, and the bulk of the population are committed to that brand, those who aren’t presumably make up the 137 million Muslims currently residing in India. We tend to forget that with a population of 164 million souls the vast majority of whom follow Islam, Pakistan is indeed the second most populous Muslim nation on the planet – after Indonesia (pop 234,693,997), but India is the third largest population of Muslims.
Pakistan cannot possibly succeed if religion is discounted. Why else would the original inhabitants accept the post partition arrivals were it not for religion? After all India’s Muslim people still live a life of oppression and fear in India.
Despite the tough times the Sindh middle class is having at the moment from Reuters:

KARACHI (Reuters) – Pakistani businessmen are veterans of political crises, but this time they say it’s different.
From self-employed truck drivers to wealthy factory owners, no one can recall anything like the violence that shook Pakistan after last week’s murder of former premier Benazir Bhutto.
“This is the worst situation we’ve ever faced,” said Barkat Ali, surveying the charred remains of a petrol station and restaurant that he and his brother-in-law set up in Karachi four years ago.
“Right now, the security is present,” Ali added, peering over his spectacles at a few soldiers patrolling across the road in an industrial area of the country’s largest city. “But if they leave the area, the fear is there. It’s never happened before.”

It is unlikely many would swap their charred ruins for life in India. An old friend (a Hindu) from Gujarat State in India (Gujarat borders Pakistan) used to tell me stories of the desperate state of life being a Muslim in Gujarat. Whenever some disaster occurred for example in 2002 a train fire in Godhra, local Hindu political street bosses divert attention from the real cause by blaming Muslims.
The result was the Gujarat riots. Absolute chaos throughout Gujarat and south to Mumbai (Bombay) as huge gangs of Hindu thugs dragged Muslims from their homes and burned houses down, destroyed businesses and factories, raped and murdered Muslims. The toll from the train fire (58) can be found anywhere on the Inter-web, but the Gujarat riot death toll is much harder to ascertain. I finally found an interim figure in a BBC article which gives a toll of “790 Muslims and 254 Hindus were killed, 223 more people reported missing and another 2,500 injured.
Of course many Hindu’s in India are appalled by the anti-Muslim pogroms, it was one of the primary reasons my friend left India, yet the oppression and religious division continues largely unabated. The most annoying thing about this is that Pakistan is always cast in a bad light as the cause of the problems between India and Pakistan, but the Pakistani government doesn’t stand by while enforcers from the ruling political Party murder relatives of Indian citizens. It was the Indian Army which oppressed the people of Kashmir and enforced unjust eviction orders on Kasmiri Muslim landowners so that Hindus from outside Kashmir could dominate the once burgeoning tourism industry, but still charlatans like William Dalrymple in the NYT seek to blame Pakistan’s leaders for everything short of murdering Jesus. In this case Benazir Bhutto for being the cause of regional tension and disputes.
Why doesn’t Dalrymple just say what he means, which is Bhutto was a Pakistani and all Pakistanis are Muslims, therefore no matter who far a Pakistani such as Bhutto crawls up the ass of amerikan corporate capitalists she will always be an evil Islamic blasphemer. Indians with their ‘quaint’ animism are currently seen as much less of a threat. Nobody talks of the war between Judeo/xtianity and Kali.
I betcha that will change in less that 50 years. Think about it, both India and China have national philosophies which have changed almost zero from their pantheist past. Both India and China are about to dominate the world’s trade and although India is seen as the ‘nice’ one by the west, in other words the Indian administrative infrastructure is seen as too corrupt and bumbling to pose a ‘real threat’.
That is now, as India leaps ahead economically it will regain the self confidence it needs to assert it’s own administrative methodology rather than rely on an imperfectly transplanted USuk one.
Then the elites of ‘the West’ are going to feel far more threatened by India than Pakistan’s current rather tenuous threat, (most oil resources are controlled by Islamic cultures, Pakistan is an Islamic culture therefore Pakistan is in cahoots with those who control oil resources who are ‘with us’ so they must be against us).
That’s the time when Pakistan will be promoted by the western capitalist media as the best thing since sliced bread as “they confront the Indo/Chinese menace”.
Of course the other alternative would be that the populations of ‘western capitalist’ nations confront their elites and say “we’re not gonna fall for the old foreigners are evil trick anymore. Sort yourselves out up there in the boardroom! (dream on).

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jan 5 2008 2:27 utc | 53

Flashback: Death squads
Speaking of Allan Nairn, Charlie Rose March 31 1995

Elliott Abrams, Former Asst. Secretary of State/ Allan Nairn, The Nation/ Rep. Robert Torricelli, (D) New Jersey/House Intelligence Committee/ Frank Israel, Architect/ Jim Nantz, CBS Sports

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 5 2008 3:57 utc | 54

Fake Green
Nice, very nice analysis of what’s wrong with faux green cars:

According to Romm’s analysis, the math for hydrogen cars simply doesn’t work out. Burning coal to generate one megawatt-hour of electricity produces about 2,100 pounds of carbon dioxide. It follows that one megawatt-hour of renewable power can avert those emissions. Using that electricity to make hydrogen would yield enough fuel for a fuel-cell car to travel about 1,000 miles, Romm says. But driving those 1,000 miles in a gasoline- powered car that gets 40 miles per gallon would produce just 485 pounds of carbon dioxide. In this sense, Romm says, a vehicle powered by hydrogen fuel cells would indirectly create four times the carbon dioxide emissions of today’s most efficient gasoline cars.
And the numbers for the Hydrogen 7 are worse, because it burns hydrogen. Combustion produces thrilling torque, but it’s far less efficient than fuel-cell technology. Also counting against the Hydrogen 7 is the fact that it stores hydrogen as a liquid; chilling hydrogen and compressing it into liquid form consumes more energy than storing it as a compressed gas. “It’s safe to say this is a pointless activity,” Romm says. “BMW has managed to develop the least efficient conceivable vehicle that you could invent.”

Posted by: citizen | Jan 5 2008 4:05 utc | 55

As remarked by a commenter, “this is unprecedented”…
Jose Padilla sues John Yoo!

In the latest legal contest over the treatment of detained terrorist suspects, attorneys for Jose Padilla filed a suit in a California federal district court this morning against John Yoo, the former deputy assistant Attorney General whose legal opinions formed the basis for Padilla’s detention and the interrogation techniques used against him that the attorneys call torture.

Also see, Andrew Sullivan of the Atlantic here:

Defendant John Yoo, along with other senior officials, deliberately removed Mr. Padilla from due process protections traditionally available to U.S. citizens detained by their government and barred all access to the outside world, including access to counsel. On information and belief, Defendant Yoo and other senior officials then personally formulated and/or approved and/or failed to act upon actual or constructive knowledge of, a systematic program of illegal detention and interrogation, which was specifically designed to inflict, and did inflict, severe physical and mental pain and suffering on Mr. Padilla for the purpose of extracting information from him and/or punishing him without due process of law, and which proximately caused the harms to Mr. Padilla alleged herein…
Defendant Yoo personally provided numerous legal memoranda that purported to provide to senior government officials a legal basis to implement an extreme and unprecedented interrogation and detention program – even though such tactics are unprecedented in U.S. history and clearly contrary to the U.S. Constitution and the law of war.
# Mr. Padilla suffered and continues to suffer severe mental and physical harm as a result of the forty-four months of military detention and interrogation that he endured, detention and interrogation for which Defendant Yoo personally purported to provide a legal blank check. # Ms. Lebron was also injured by the conduct of the Defendant, which caused her to be deprived of the virtually all contact with her son, Mr. Padilla, for the duration of his illegal detention and interrogation, in violation of her constitutional rights to familial association and communication. # Plaintiffs Padilla and Lebron assert this complaint against Defendant John Yoo in his individual capacity.

Horton hears a yoo? W/apologies to Dr. Seuss…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 5 2008 4:43 utc | 56

file this under “new scramble for africa”
FT: Gazprom plans Africa gas grab

Gazprom, Russia’s state-owned energy group, is seeking to win access to vast energy reserves in Nigeria in a move that will heighten concerns among western governments over its increasingly powerful grip on gas supplies to Europe.
A senior Nigerian oil industry official, who declined to be named, said the company was offering to invest in energy infrastructure in return for the chance to develop some of the biggest gas deposits in the world.
The Russian move is part of a courtship that saw Vladimir Putin writing to Nigeria’s leader, Umaru Yar’Adua, last year to seek energy co-operation.

“What Gazprom is proposing is mind-boggling,” the Nigerian oil official told the Financial Times. “They’re talking tough and saying the west has taken advantage of us in the last 50 years and they’re offering us a better deal … They are ready to beat the Chinese, the Indians and the Americans.”
Gazprom representative Ilya Kochevrin confirmed the talks with Nigerian officials. “We made a decision to go global in terms of acquiring assets and developing strategy outside Russia. Africa is one of our priorities,” he said.
Any move by Gazprom to establish itself in Nigeria, long dominated by companies such as Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron and ExxonMobil, would reinforce a global trend of state-backed energy companies challenging western rivals.

Posted by: b real | Jan 5 2008 5:34 utc | 57

Two Slain U.S. Soldiers Were Killed By Iraqi Soldier

An Iraqi soldier opened fire on U.S. troops during a joint patrol in the northern city of Mosul on December 26, killing two and wounding three others along with a civilian interpreter, Iraqi and U.S. officials said on Saturday.
U.S. military spokesman Lieutenant-Colonel James Hutton said it was not clear why the Iraqi soldier had opened fire, but two Iraqi generals told Reuters the attacker had links to Sunni Arab insurgent groups and had been detained.

Local media reported that the Iraqi soldier killed the two men after he saw them flirting with women earlier in the day, but Khazraji denied this saying they had been operating in a largely deserted area.

Posted by: b | Jan 5 2008 11:22 utc | 58

b @ 58
“Local media reported that the Iraqi soldier killed the two men after he saw them flirting with women earlier in the day…”
Flirting… How cute. But that isn’t what the US spokespeople were denying to the local media. Aswat:

The U.S. side denied that this Iraqi soldier opened fire at U.S. servicemen because they sexually harassed an Iraqi girl (…)

And what the Iraqi street is saying is,
Iraqi soldier “Caesar” killed three American soldiers because they kicked and beat a pregnant woman

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 5 2008 18:24 utc | 59

From Sudden Debt, one of my favorite econ blogs,
The Phoney Recession

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 6 2008 0:07 utc | 60

#59,
Its taken at least 3 days for this story to make national news here (just on ABC tonight) but still no mention of any attack on a woman.

Posted by: anna missed | Jan 6 2008 2:23 utc | 61

echorouk online: French expert: France cancelled Dakar Rally because of foreign pressures

France has decided to cancel the Dakar Rally, which was supposed to start on January 5th due to pressures from neighbouring countries. Threats from Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb are overstated; which hits Mauritania’s political and economic situation, according to a French expert.
“French authorities have overstated what was previously known as the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC). The terrorist organisation was each time threatening the Rally but solutions could be found in any case of attack,” Anne Giudicelli told Echorouk.

..Giudicelli believes that the terrorist organisation is relatively weak in Mauritania compared to Algeria where terrorist threat is bigger and more dangerous.
She says Al-Qaeda’s threat to the Sahara desert and Sahel is not new this year. Every year, the GSPC threats to hinder the motorcycle marathon and kill the competitors.
Asked about the setting up of a US base in the region, Giudicelli said the cancellation of the Dakar Rally is in favour of those who call on establishing AFRICOM alleging that terrorist threat is now regional and not in one nation only. That means this issue is exploited to support the US decision.
“It certainly does not mean that the United States was behind the cancellation of the Rally but it can try to exploit the event in its favour.”

but could they indeed have been behind it? sounds like there were some problems w/ AQ’s alleged ‘confession’ script
reuters, jan 1: Mauritania forces unsure of al Qaeda attack claim

NOUAKCHOTT (Reuters) – Mauritanian forces hunting the killers of French tourists and government soldiers say they are unconvinced by a claim al Qaeda launched one of the attacks, even though analysts in the region say there is little doubt.
Last week’s separate attacks have shaken the peaceful West African country as it prepares to host part of the Dakar Rally, which gives an annual boost to its nascent tourism industry.

Last Monday three attackers, who authorities suspect are linked to al Qaeda, gunned down four French tourists and injured a fifth as they enjoyed a Christmas Eve picnic by the roadside in the south of the country, near the border with Senegal.
Gunmen killed three army soldiers three days later in the remote and sparsely populated north of the country, bordering Algeria and Morocco’s breakaway territory of Western Sahara.

In an audio recording aired by Al Arabiya television, a spokesman said al Qaeda’s North African branch had killed four soldiers late on Wednesday, but made no mention of the French.
Details in the statement differed from those given by the Mauritanian authorities, and the Gulf TV station said it could not verify the statement was indeed from al Qaeda.
Security sources in Mauritania’s capital Nouakchott said al Qaeda was just one line of inquiry. They said the attackers may have been armed smugglers who traffic drugs, weapons and people over poorly policed borders deep in the Sahara.

some claim that al arabiya works closely w/ the cia. according to its sourcewatch entry

Al Arabiya and its parent network, the Middle East Broadcasting Center, are owned by Sheik Walid al-Ibrahim, the brother-in-law of King Fahd of Saudi Arabia. The New York Times wrote that Sheik Walid’s “personal political interests” may have encouraged him to found Al Arabiya: “The Saudi royal family dislikes Al Jazeera because it gives air time to Al Qaeda, and one of Al Qaeda’s most cherished goals is the overthrow of the Saudi government.”

yet one can search via google & see that al arabiya has aired multiple tapes allegedly from UBL and other AQ affiliates over the years, so that obviously doesn’t fit.
anyone have better details/insight on this story? it didn’t get too much coverage in the u.s. so i wasn’t familiar w/ it.

Posted by: b real | Jan 6 2008 4:38 utc | 62

Whoever stopped the Paris Dakar rally did the African and Arabian people a great favour. I am suprised it took this long the brit equivalent the East African Safari was finally de-registered by the World Rally Championship in 2003.
Why?
Well even in the 1960’s some whitefellas found the idea of racing through villages at speeds of over 150 kph a little shall we say murderous. The inhabitants of villages along the route of this pedestrian slaughter have ben trying to sabotage the rallies pretty much since the first one. Roadblocks of felled trees etc were common until central governments keen on the ‘publicity’ policed the routes only the locals mind, the drivers would be told that on no account were they to stop if they hit a pedestrian, lest some injury be done them I suppose.
There is a site called the Motorsport memorial which tries to commemorate those who have been killed as a result of motorsport.
For some peverse reason a few victims of the African rallies have been included. It is doubtful if the total deaths for each african natioin listed would account for one single year’s fatalities, but nevertheless some strange truths can be discovered. Kenya is running an abridged East African Safari Rally while the central government fights to get the event put back on the WRC calendar.
Here is the Kenyan Motorsport Memorial page. Nine of the deaths of ‘by-passers’ listed occured one day in 1978. I suppose that incident was so big it had to be included. it is worth noting that the names of Africans are rarely included, just the fact and date of their death. A mechanic working on the cars is killed, his name is listed but they don’t even list the name of the Kenyan policeman who was killed.
Now the details are much scarcer for Paris Dakar rally. The race usually goes through Algeria but there is no page for Algeria, Senegal has a page with a couple out of the tens maybe hundreds killed over the years listed. They tell us the person killed was a spectator but can’t tell us their name. Does that mean they just guessed he/she wasn’t an innocent passer-by. maybe the dead person was white so that qualified them as a spectator.
Libya frequently hosts Paris Dakar but they have no page. Mauritania has a page which lists the deaths of innocent by-standers from a couple of major ‘accidents’ in 1988 and 1998. It is likely once again that both of those were too big to ignore maybe they made it onto the TV screens of european rev-heads so just couldn’t be ignored. The far more frequent death of someone too slow (either too young or too old to get out of the way) is never acknowledged.
Mali also has a page with two separate fatalities of bystanders listed. Once again anecdotal ‘evidence’ over the years places the number of humans killed in mali far higher, I have no idea why these two were listed.
If amerika or France tries to blame AQ back in the countries who have been subjected to this arrogant incursion for the last half century, it will do wonders for recruitment.
It is worth noting that the mayor of Paris also got the shits with the rally and had it’s start moved out to Euro-Disney and no one called him a terrorist.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jan 6 2008 7:37 utc | 63

thanks again, debs. wasn’t familiar w/ this. sounds like more exploitation left over from the legacy colonial rule.

two quickies on the slow death of somalia’s interim govt
Somalia president is “well and healthy,” says Ambassador

ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia Jan 5 (Garowe Online) – Interim Somali President Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed, who is on a visit in neighboring Ethiopia, is “well and healthy” despite media reports of his poor health, Somalia’s ambassador to Ethiopia and permanent representative to the African Union, Said Yusuf Nur, said on Saturday.
President Yusuf arrived in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa yesterday. Media reports attributed his emergency trip to Addis Ababa to health problems, with unconfirmed reports suggesting that the Somali leader collapsed before his arrival in Addis Ababa.
Yusuf, who recently returned from a [3-week-long] medical trip to London, told reporters in the southwestern Somali town of Baidoa last week that he is feeling healthy.
A reliable source who met with President Yusuf in Addis Ababa told Garowe Online that Yusuf “does not even look sick” and was busy entertaining his aides and visitors.

The Somali president may soon head to London for another medical checkup, which had been previously scheduled, the officials added.

Somalia lawmakers have different views on new Cabinet

BAIDOA, Somalia Jan 5 (Garowe Online) – Somali lawmakers in the transitional government’s temporary capital city of Baidoa have began exchanging opposing views regarding the makeup of the country’s new Cabinet, formally announced yesterday by Prime Minister Nur “Adde” Hassan Hussein.
Ismail Buubaa, a legislator who represents the northern Somaliland region, told the Voice of America’s Somali service on Saturday that the new Cabinet might not be ratified by parliament.
“They said the [new] Cabinet will be built on competence, but when we look, we do not see this [competence],” MP Buubaa said, adding that parliament will not ratify the Cabinet ministers in his opinion.

The Somali premier is supposed to present his Cabinet to parliament on Sunday for ratification, but opposition is slowly building up in Baidoa, government sources told Garowe Online.

Prime Minister Nur Adde withdrew his first Cabinet list after heated opposition from lawmakers and armed clans, but observers worry renewed opposition to his second list of Cabinet ministers will continue the deadlock.

Posted by: b real | Jan 6 2008 8:03 utc | 64

@Alamet #60
Interesting link, and I don’t disagree with the gist of it. Just as in the political sphere, people should internalize that the “market makers” in the economic sphere don’t always act with the best interests of the consumer in mind. We seem to think that everyone always takes care of us and nobody would do anything to deliberately harm our welfare (except for imaginary “terrorists”… those guys never stop thinking about ways to harm us).
Another reason that you will never hear much negative talk from market analysts is that it is THEIR JOB to maintain consumer confidence. That translates to a perpetual and phony optimism. It’s all right to discuss a recession after it is over, but to mention one while it is looming might cause the consumers to start watching their nickels and dimes and can exacerbate the effects.
But, yes, some folk are just malevolent. These would be the “enemy forces” alluded to in your link at #60, and the number of malevolent agents is not negligible. These are the guys who gave us rolling blackouts to elevate energy costs and increase their own market shares at the expense of the consumer. Sometimes, these folk do it just for the sheer hell of it.
These are the things that pop into my mind when I hear folk going on about “healthy competition” and the curative effects of free and open markets. It’s worse than snake oil they’re selling here.

Posted by: Monolycus | Jan 6 2008 8:47 utc | 65

In WaPo(!) George McGovern for impeachment: Why I Believe Bush Must Go Nixon Was Bad. These Guys Are Worse.

As we enter the eighth year of the Bush-Cheney administration, I have belatedly and painfully concluded that the only honorable course for me is to urge the impeachment of the president and the vice president.

Of course, there seems to be little bipartisan support for impeachment. The political scene is marked by narrow and sometimes superficial partisanship, especially among Republicans, and a lack of courage and statesmanship on the part of too many Democratic politicians. So the chances of a bipartisan impeachment and conviction are not promising.
But what are the facts?
Bush and Cheney are clearly guilty of numerous impeachable offenses. They have repeatedly violated the Constitution. They have transgressed national and international law. They have lied to the American people time after time. Their conduct and their barbaric policies have reduced our beloved country to a historic low in the eyes of people around the world. These are truly “high crimes and misdemeanors,” to use the constitutional standard.

Will anyone listen?

Posted by: b | Jan 6 2008 12:33 utc | 66

On Sibel Edmonds in the London Times: For sale: West’s deadly nuclear secrets

A WHISTLEBLOWER has made a series of extraordinary claims about how corrupt government officials allowed Pakistan and other states to steal nuclear weapons secrets.
Sibel Edmonds, a 37-year-old former Turkish language translator for the FBI, listened into hundreds of sensitive intercepted conversations while based at the agency’s Washington field office.
She approached The Sunday Times last month after reading about an Al-Qaeda terrorist who had revealed his role in training some of the 9/11 hijackers while he was in Turkey.
Edmonds described how foreign intelligence agents had enlisted the support of US officials to acquire a network of moles in sensitive military and nuclear institutions.
Among the hours of covert tape recordings, she says she heard evidence that one well-known senior official in the US State Department was being paid by Turkish agents in Washington who were selling the information on to black market buyers, including Pakistan.
The name of the official – who has held a series of top government posts – is known to The Sunday Times. He strongly denies the claims.
However, Edmonds said: “He was aiding foreign operatives against US interests by passing them highly classified information, not only from the State Department but also from the Pentagon, in exchange for money, position and political objectives.”

The Turks and Israelis had planted “moles” in military and academic institutions which handled nuclear technology. Edmonds says there were several transactions of nuclear material every month, with the Pakistanis being among the eventual buyers. “The network appeared to be obtaining information from every nuclear agency in the United States,” she said.
They were helped, she says, by the high-ranking State Department official who provided some of their moles – mainly PhD students – with security clearance to work in sensitive nuclear research facilities. These included the Los Alamos nuclear laboratory in New Mexico, which is responsible for the security of the US nuclear deterrent.

Edmonds also claims that a number of senior officials in the Pentagon had helped Israeli and Turkish agents.
“The people provided lists of potential moles from Pentagon-related institutions who had access to databases concerning this information,” she said.
“The handlers, who were part of the diplomatic community, would then try to recruit those people to become moles for the network. The lists contained all their ‘hooking points’, which could be financial or sexual pressure points, their exact job in the Pentagon and what stuff they had access to.”
One of the Pentagon figures under investigation was Lawrence Franklin, a former Pentagon analyst, who was jailed in 2006 for passing US defence information to lobbyists and sharing classified information with an Israeli diplomat.
“He was one of the top people providing information and packages during 2000 and 2001,” she said.

The senior official in the State Department no longer works there. Last week he denied all of Edmonds’s allegations: “If you are calling me to say somebody said that I took money, that’s outrageous . . . I do not have anything to say about such stupid ridiculous things as this.”
In researching this article, The Sunday Times has talked to two FBI officers (one serving, one former) and two former CIA sources who worked on nuclear proliferation. While none was aware of specific allegations against officials she names, they did provide overlapping corroboration of Edmonds’s story.
One of the CIA sources confirmed that the Turks had acquired nuclear secrets from the United States and shared the information with Pakistan and Israel. “We have no indication that Turkey has its own nuclear ambitions. But the Turks are traders. To my knowledge they became big players in the late 1990s,” the source said.

Posted by: b | Jan 6 2008 13:17 utc | 67

b @ 67
who is she talking about?

Posted by: dan of steele | Jan 6 2008 13:55 utc | 68

@DoS – Via the Brad Blog someone says Grossman.

While that “well-known senior” State Department official is not named by the paper, Australia’s Luke Ryland, who writes at a number of sites as “Lukery”, is perhaps the world’s foremost expert concerning the Sibel Edmonds story. Ryland has told The BRAD BLOG that the official, unnamed by the Times, is Marc Grossman.

Posted by: b | Jan 6 2008 19:25 utc | 69

Report calls Israeli courts unfair

JERUSALEM – Israel’s military court system for Palestinian suspects in the West Bank produces almost automatic convictions, an Israeli human rights group charged Sunday.
The group, Yesh Din, said in a new report that in 2006 more than 99.7 percent of those accused were convicted, 95 percent in plea bargains.

The Yesh Din report said, however, that military court proceedings can be startlingly brief, citing a study of 38 hearings where prosecutors sought to extend suspects’ detention in custody until the end of case, which generally means remand for a year or more.
Of those 38 hearings, Yesh Din says, seven lasted between two and four minutes, 19 lasted between one and two minutes and 12 were over in less than a minute.

Hearings were held in Hebrew and simultaneous translation into Arabic was mainly carried out by conscript soldiers rather than professional interpreters, with the result that suspects, and their attorneys, often did not understand the charges.
“Most are detained in Israel and their attorneys are not able to meet them,” said Michael Sfard, Yesh Din’s legal counsel. In addition, minors were often tried as adults and detained at length before being charged.
Sfard said the 0.29 percent acquittal rating in 2006, or 23 cases out of 9,123, was most jarring

Posted by: b | Jan 6 2008 19:27 utc | 70

Heads up: Peak Food

Posted by: Wolf DeVoon | Jan 6 2008 20:09 utc | 71

one of the comments there at bradblog kinda rang true, why is this published in the Sunday Times? Ms Edmonds is not allowed to divulge secret information, period.
this is most likely some disinformation designed to blame the Pakistan nukes on the Clinton administration which is when this supposed transfer of super secret information took place.
these bastards never sleep, do they?

Posted by: dan of steele | Jan 6 2008 20:33 utc | 72

Jonathan Cook has an excellent summary of Ehud Barak’s “generous offer”. Details and machinations of the earlier Wye and Camp David “peace conference”, according to Cook, were studied by Olmert and Livni in preparation for Annapolis. Extracts of Barak’s “concessions” have now been acknowledged and printed Haaretz.

Posted by: ww | Jan 6 2008 21:01 utc | 73

anna missed # 61,
Via Information Clearing House, I see that Xinhuanet ran the story back on Jan 3.
Report: U.S. soldiers killed by Iraqi beat pregnant woman

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 6 2008 23:58 utc | 74

Monolycus # 65,
The Smoking Debt Gun
and
The Trigger Man Wore A Suit
were the two posts that got me hooked on Sudden Debt. It’s economy analysis that views the people not as consumers/subprime borrowers/reckless buyers, but as ordinary people struggling to stay afloat while being robbed of options. Too bad the blogger isn’t a socialist. Or rather, too too too bad there doesn’t seem to be readily available socialist analysis similarly based in the material world, and making a case for structural change.

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 7 2008 0:08 utc | 75

The headline is of course a big lie – how can a prison defy?
Defying U.S. Plan, Prison Expands in Afghanistan

The American detention center, established at the Bagram military base as a temporary screening site after the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, is now teeming with some 630 prisoners — more than twice the 275 being held at Guantánamo.

Meanwhile, the treatment of some prisoners on the Bagram base has prompted a strong complaint to the Pentagon from the International Committee of the Red Cross, the only outside group allowed in the detention center.
In a confidential memorandum last summer, the Red Cross said dozens of prisoners had been held incommunicado for weeks or even months in a previously undisclosed warren of isolation cells at Bagram, two American officials said. The Red Cross said the prisoners were kept from its inspectors and sometimes subjected to cruel treatment in violation of the Geneva Conventions, one of the officials said.

A push by some Defense Department officials to have Kabul authorize the indefinite military detention of “enemy combatants” — adopting a legal framework like that of Guantánamo — foundered in 2006 when aides to President Hamid Karzai persuaded him not to sign a decree that had been written with American help.

Despite some expansion and renovation, the detention center remains a crude place where most prisoners are fenced into large metal pens, military officers and former detainees have said.
Military personnel who know both Bagram and Guantánamo describe the Afghan site, on an American-controlled military base 40 miles north of Kabul, as far more spartan. Bagram prisoners have fewer privileges, less ability to contest their detention and no access to lawyers. Some detainees have been held without charge for more than five years, officials said.

Afghan officials rejected pressure from Washington to adopt a detention system modeled on the Bush administration’s “enemy combatant” legal framework, American officials said. Some Defense Department officials even urged the Afghan military to set up military commissions like those at Guantánamo, the officials said.

But some United States officials say they have also had to reassess the Afghans’ ability to hold more dangerous detainees. They said the detention center at Bagram would probably continue to hold hundreds of prisoners indefinitely. “The idea is that over time, some of our detainees at Bagram — especially those at the lower end of the threat scale — will be passed on to Afghanistan,” one senior military official said last year. “But not all. Bagram will remain an intelligence asset and a screening area.”

even now, the legal basis under which prisoners are being held at the Afghan detention center remains unclear. Another Defense Department official, who insisted on anonymity because she was not authorized to publicly discuss the issue, said the detentions had been authorized “in a note from the attorney general stating that he recognizes that they have the legal authority under the law of war to hold enemy combatants as security threats if they choose to do so.”

Posted by: b | Jan 7 2008 7:00 utc | 76

Thanks to all for an illuminating thread. I found the contributions
of DID and b real regarding the Paris-Dakar rally to be very illuminating,
as also were many other posts here.
I must, alas, also agree with Tangerine’s comments on narcissism: I think of myself as a sort of lefty anarchist (a contradiction in terms,
of course) but have always had my salary paid by some “big government” or other. And with regard to Sarko, my “significant other” notes the upcoming nuptials between Sarko and Carla Bruni with disgust: I am merely amused.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jan 7 2008 8:52 utc | 77

gulf of tonkin incident

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 7 2008 16:44 utc | 78

a new gulf of tonkin incident in the hormuz straits

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 7 2008 16:46 utc | 79

I actually laughed out loud.
Bush says US economy on ‘solid foundation’

After meeting with his top economic advisers hours after the US economy posted its weakest employment report in four years, President George Bush said both the US economy and the financial markets are still strong.
‘This economy of ours is on a solid foundation, but we can’t take economic growth for granted and there are signs that cause us to be ever more diligent to make sure that good policies come out of Washington,’ Bush said today at the White House, after meeting for the first time with the president’s working group on financial markets.
Bush said Thursday in an interview with Reuters that he is considering some sort of ‘stimulus’ package, but he declined to be specific about any forthcoming proposals.
The comments and the meeting come just after the Labor Department reported that the US economy added 18,000 jobs in December, the smallest monthly gain since 2003. Earlier in the week oil prices topped 100 usd per barrel for the first time and the nation is in the midst of a housing slump.
‘While there is some uncertainty,’ Bush said, ‘the financial markets are strong and solid.’
The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down more than 200 points in early afternoon trading.

This is also coming from someone who thinks that 50.01% is an “overwhelming mandate”. The problem, obviously, is that basic mathematics are simply not the President’s strongest and most solid area.

Posted by: Monolycus | Jan 7 2008 17:42 utc | 80

united states justice commits another genocide in haditha

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 7 2008 18:18 utc | 81

Long, detailed coverage by Dahr Jamail and Ali Al Fadhily:
IRAQ: Killer of U.S. Soldiers Becomes a Hero

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 8 2008 0:26 utc | 82

U.S. academic Finkelstein meets top Hezbollah official in Lebanon

(snip)
“After the horror and after the shame and after the anger there still remain a hope, and I know that I can get in a lot of trouble for what I am about to say, but I think that the Hezbollah represents the hope. They are fighting to defend their homeland,” the Brooklyn-born Finkelstein told reporters.
(snip)

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 8 2008 0:29 utc | 83

Probably the contents of this link have already been signaled to MOA, but I can’t resist celebrating this exemplar of due process , seldom more due (in all senses) than here.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jan 8 2008 9:13 utc | 84

Always smart, astute, insightful.
Gloria Steinem on gender and race (i.e. Obama and Hillary):

So why is the sex barrier not taken as seriously as the racial one? The reasons are as pervasive as the air we breathe: because sexism is still confused with nature as racism once was; because anything that affects males is seen as more serious than anything that affects “only” the female half of the human race; because children are still raised mostly by women (to put it mildly) so men especially tend to feel they are regressing to childhood when dealing with a powerful woman; because racism stereotyped black men as more “masculine” for so long that some white men find their presence to be masculinity-affirming (as long as there aren’t too many of them); and because there is still no “right” way to be a woman in public power without being considered a you-know-what.

What worries me is that she is accused of “playing the gender card” when citing the old boys’ club, while he is seen as unifying by citing civil rights confrontations.
What worries me is that male Iowa voters were seen as gender-free when supporting their own, while female voters were seen as biased if they did and disloyal if they didn’t.
What worries me is that reporters ignore Mr. Obama’s dependence on the old — for instance, the frequent campaign comparisons to John F. Kennedy, though Senator Edward Kennedy is supporting Senator Clinton — while not challenging the slander that her progressive policies are part of the Washington status quo.
What worries me is that some women, perhaps especially younger ones, hope to deny or escape the sexual caste system; thus Iowa women over 50 and 60, who disproportionately supported Senator Clinton, proved once again that women are the one group that grows more radical with age.

Wise words amidst the media frenzy.

Posted by: Hamburger | Jan 8 2008 10:03 utc | 85

Mearsheimer&Walt: Israel’s false friends

If the Democratic and Republican contenders were true friends of Israel, they would be warning it about the danger of becoming an apartheid state, just as Carter did.
Moreover, they would be calling for an end to the occupation and the creation of a viable Palestinian state. And they would be calling for the United States to act as an honest broker between Israel and the Palestinians so that Washington could pressure both sides to accept a solution based on the Clinton parameters. Implementing a final-status agreement will be difficult and take a number of years, but it is imperative that the two sides formally agree on the solution and then implement it in ways that protect each side.
But Israel’s false friends cannot say any of these things, or even discuss the issue honestly. Why? Because they fear that speaking the truth would incur the wrath of the hard-liners who dominate the main organizations in the Israel lobby. So Israel will end up controlling Gaza and the West Bank for the foreseeable future, turning itself into an apartheid state in the process. And all of this will be done with the backing of its so-called friends, including the current presidential candidates. With friends like them, who needs enemies?

Posted by: b | Jan 8 2008 18:46 utc | 86

informative interview w/ tim shorrock on kpfa’s against the grain today — “State of Spying”
audio archive should be up later today

Posted by: b real | Jan 8 2008 20:31 utc | 87

Weirder and weirder…
More on Marc Grossman
I don’t think I know anything about the Kuchma story here.

Posted by: Alamet | Jan 8 2008 22:19 utc | 88

Did not see this link here:
Crooks and Liars » Sean Hannity Flees from Ron Paul Supporters

Ron Paul supporters were yelling ” FOX News Sucks” and chasing after Sean Hannity the other night. “Hey Hannity, how about an interview?” “We’re not falling for it anymore” “You suck Sean”…FNC shut out Ron Paul from their Republican Presidential forum on Sunday which angered many supporters of his campaign.

Great stuff.

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Jan 8 2008 22:26 utc | 89

Thanks again askod. Torches and pitchforks next?

Posted by: beq | Jan 9 2008 0:34 utc | 90

fuck me dead
you can’t be much dumber than dobbs, lou dobbs
he’s got his proper der stürmer on cnn spewing hatred for the ‘other’
it really is a form of torture to watch these people – they are like efram zimbalist on crack – an eliot ness on narcotics
it’s like a bizarre form of cartoon where skin suddenly appears to be paper thin – something you could read rupert muroch’s wall st journal through – when t s eliot spoke of the “hollow men” – i don’t think he understood – how hollow

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 9 2008 0:35 utc | 91

this dumb dobbs – he’s like some crazed figure from a novel by dreiser of upton sinclair. he’s father coghlan without the collar – or lindbergh without the plane

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 9 2008 0:40 utc | 92

where does cnn contract these people – they are really like figurines from some mexican sci-fi film & none more so than anderson cooper – but really the whole clan – i mean klan – they are as shaft would say – a sorry bunch of motherfuckers – who weep words far more easily & on order than madam macbeth clinton
they give new meaning to the word, horror

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 9 2008 1:03 utc | 93

R’Giap, anderson cooper is ex-CIA. that may explain some things eh?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 9 2008 1:15 utc | 94

uncle,
i would have thought cooper is too cretinous even for them

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 9 2008 1:31 utc | 95

i would have thought cooper is too cretinous even for them
HaHa…He’s perfect. He’s Gloria Vanderbilt’s son, interned @CIA. What could be more perfect – member of Aristocracy in good standing who thinks CIA is cool. And got his permanent job ‘cuz he’s a warm fuzzy faggot, thus americablog – CNN’s fave gay boy – mobilized lobbying for him when he first showed up tentatively on the channel, around time of Katrina. He’s perfect for interviewing drowned out small business owners around the Gulf. Beyond that, ridiculous.
The criteria for CNN, judging from their domestic hires, are Aristocracy, CIA or Pentagon approved (literally).

Posted by: jj | Jan 9 2008 2:05 utc | 96

After yesterday’s “authoritative polls” gave Obama a 10% lead in New Hampshire we wake up to find that Hillary has won there. Moreover, McCain beat Romney and Ron Paul failed to get 10% of the vote (which, Giuliani, just barely, did). So either the pollsters have once again been shown to be grossly incompetent (certainly a strong possibility) or we must contemplate this polemical video from BBV. In a sense it grieves me to post the BBV video, since it represents a (to my mind not irrational) vote of no confidence in the solidity of the cornerstone of American democracy, namely the integrity of the electoral process.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jan 9 2008 6:45 utc | 97

@ Uncle, giap and jj:
If Cooper is CIA, what about Blitzer? It would be really helpful if the various network “talking heads” replaced their U.S. flag lapel buttons with the insignia of their paymasters, so that we could see who was (on the payroll of or working in the interests of) CIA, who was DIA, who was Mossad, who was MI6, or RAW or DSE or ISI, etc. Many on-screen discussions would thus be elevated to the level of friendly verbal ping-pong matches between spooks, cut-outs and those auditioning for the cast.
Lately I have been watching Press TV , the Iranian version of CNN, BBC, or Al Jazeera. It’s considerably less polished, but produces lots of (interminable) panel discussions with the kind of people you almost never see on the “domesticated” networks.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jan 9 2008 7:43 utc | 98

HKOL, Blitzer comes from their Zionist networks. I forget specifics, but prolly (as Uncle sez) someone recalls details. Was he editor of Jerusalem Post, or something along those lines.
I also heard Mike Malloy talking about CNN one night, when he was in serious disgust w/media mode. He said their Honchos openly discussed calling Pentagon for recommendations on what Generals to use. Also, guys strutting around newsroom openly discussing being CIA. Their other domestic journo, who is good when allowed to be – I forget her name, it’s unusual – & very likeable, bright, serious – is of Iranian descent, Brit. raised, an heiress, married to Jamie Rubin. (They cut her off of live reporting after she commented on the air on how crappy their war coverage was. She’d done good stuff from Afghanistan.) So, who cares who she’s married to? You do. He’s son of Robert Rubin, who runs Dem. Party & currently filling in as head of Citigroup.
But I like yr. idea for lapel pins identifying their patrons…

Posted by: jj | Jan 9 2008 9:06 utc | 99