Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
December 29, 2007
Who Killed Bhutto?

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton called for an independent, international investigation into the death of one million Iraqis — perhaps by the United Nations — saying Friday there was "no reason to trust the U.S. government."
Link

Yes – I misquoted that bit of hypocrisy. It was originally aimed at Pakistan. But there is more of her lunacy:

[W]e need to help them understand what is in their interest and that of course includes President Musharraf.

Sure, we’ll tell these niggers ….

There are lots of ideas out there who and what killed Bhutto.

Bush and Musharraf say Al-Qaida.

Neocon Eli Lake spins this:

The attack yesterday at Rawalpindi bore the hallmarks of a sophisticated military operation. At first, Bhutto’s rally was hit by a suicide bomb that turned out to be a decoy. According to press reports and a situation report of the incident relayed to The New York Sun by an American intelligence officer, Bhutto’s armored limousine was shot by multiple snipers whose armor-piercing bullets penetrated the vehicle, hitting the former premier five times in the head, chest, and neck.

Barnett Rubin thinks Pakistani Taliban and al-Qaeda, but the Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud denies any involvement.

Someone speculates about a drug related hit-squad tasked by a former Pakistani General.

Bhutto’s party folks are implicating Musharraf.

Tomorrow a letter from Bhutto herself will be read and it is expected that it will put the blame on Musharraf too (she was also a prophet?).

Officially she died from the bomb blast
that blew her against a handle of her cars sun roof, fracturing her skull. According to the pictures, that is at least a possiblity. But does it matter?

Bhutto orchestrated the killing of her own brother. She supported the Taliban. She stole about $1.5 billion from her people.

Even without the recent political maneuverings there were plenty of motives to kill her and even more possible perpetrators. We will never really know who ordered this.

Any further investigation would be a political football and
abused to serve this or that policy purpose (think Hariri in Beirut).

This is one of these political assassination that will never be solved in a way that satisfies all doubters. It will forever spin myriads of conspiracy theories (think Kennedy in Dallas).

So what do you think: Did China do it? How was India involved?

Comments

We will never know. (Officially, AlQ or Muslim militants, etc. will be blamed.)
Not Al Quaida – doesn’t exist in any meaningful terms.
Not Mush – he is not a complete idiot.
As I mentioned before, there was an attack at the same moment on Nawar Sharif. (Still alive.)
Pakistan is ruled by the upper classes and the army. Mush co-opted the powerful with financial favors (etc) thereby assuring support, even if loudmouthed criticism arises at times: the upper classes depend on him, there is no way they will change. Which is why he has lasted so long; the demands of the US are bothersome, dumb, but finally of not much account. No top dogs object seriously.
His support is right there on the ground, buddies with estates, fortunes, businesses, etc. And he has the army at his hand…

Posted by: Tangerine | Dec 29 2007 18:52 utc | 1

@Tangerine – As I mentioned before, there was an attack at the same moment on Nawar Sharif.
From what I have read their were shots fired when the rally convened from a bureau of a competing party. Sharif was not there when the shots were fired. But who knows which of these stories are realy real …
Conspiracy theory from a comment at the Guardian

Ms Bhutto was about to dare US into entering Pakistan and start a new battle with Taliban and the extremists in country’s rugged tribal regions. This would have cost US billions of dollors more. US economy is is in very bad shape. A new war would have buried US economy into a long recession. Therefore, US decided to bury Bhutto instead. IF US decided not to order its troops into Pakistan even after being given green light, then whole world would have mocked US as chickens who ran away from Taliban. This would have been a disgrace for US’ arrogant pride. Hence, to save itself from humilation, as well to protect its economy, CIA had to stop Benazir who would have dared asked US forces to come into Pakistan. This means this was a cowardly murder. US was too scared to go into a new war. Benazir’s killing was an economic murder. It was also a assassination out of cowardice.

Posted by: b | Dec 29 2007 19:11 utc | 2

no idea who killed her, but it’s pretty clear who’s responsible for it

Posted by: b real | Dec 29 2007 21:38 utc | 3

I offer this as uneducated speculation only, so, grain of salt, etc.
Roughly, there are competing factions within the Musharaf aparat, both having roots in the American war against the Russians in Afghanistan. One, bought and paid for by US bucks, wants to accommodate the Americans in its “war on terror”, Waziristan, etc, the other wants to maintain its Islamist allies, or is Islamist itself.
In my opinion, the latter assassinated the American sponsored (newly minted) Bhutto, since she would have strengthened the American faction by legitimizing Musharaf, a referee at this point, and possibly invited US forces on the Pakistani side of the border.
The warnings by Bhutto that Musharaf is to blame are really aimed at that faction in the Musharaf coalition in the army/secret services that is Islamist.
So in a way, it’s true that “al Qaida” killed Bhutto, only not exactly as the Americans would have you believe. It’s easier to blame some tribal leader in the northwest than factions within the Musharaf coalition. It’s interesting that the Americans are busting a gut trying to legitimize Musharaf.

Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Dec 29 2007 21:58 utc | 4

I offer this as uneducated speculation only, so, grain of salt, etc.
Roughly, there are competing factions within the Musharaf aparat, both having roots in the American war against the Russians in Afghanistan. One, bought and paid for by US bucks, wants to accommodate the Americans in its “war on terror”, Waziristan, etc, the other wants to maintain its Islamist allies, or is Islamist itself.
In my opinion, the latter assassinated the American sponsored (newly minted) Bhutto, since she would have strengthened the American faction by legitimizing Musharaf, a referee at this point, and possibly invited US forces on the Pakistani side of the border.
The warnings by Bhutto that Musharaf is to blame are really aimed at that faction in the Musharaf coalition in the army/secret services that is Islamist.
So in a way, it’s true that “al Qaida” killed Bhutto, only not exactly as the Americans would have you believe. It’s easier to blame some tribal leader in the northwest than factions within the Musharaf coalition. It’s interesting that the Americans are busting a gut trying to legitimize Musharaf.

Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Dec 29 2007 21:58 utc | 5

Apologies for the double post. Emphasis, I guess.

Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Dec 29 2007 21:59 utc | 6

The whole thing has descended into farce, and the PPP, according to Time, will nominate Bhutto’s nineteen year old son as leader. Condoleeza Rice, no doubt, will be thrilled.
Lol!

Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Dec 29 2007 22:12 utc | 7

For me, the prime suspect(s) is/are the fundamentalist elements within the ISI. The ISI and Interior Minister have been spreading disinformation about her cause of death to create confusion. The ISI has always worked closely with Al-Qaida and Taliban elements in Afghanistan and the Federal Tribal areas on the border. For example, they airlifted them to safety from Kunduz in Nov. 2001. Only a day or two before her death, she met with Pres. Karzai and promised to crack down on Al-Qaida if she were to win the elections.
Interestingly, she told David Frost in an interview in October that Bin Laden was dead and had been killed by Omar Sheik, a man known to have ties to the ISI. Additionally, the media has spun Ms. Bhutto’s email that she wrote prior to her death to Mark Seigel to say he blamed Musharraf. She actually said she would hold Musharraf responsible if she were killed because he did not provide enough security, and one must note the ISI is involved in the internal security apparatus as well.

Posted by: D | Dec 29 2007 22:27 utc | 8

The leadership of Pakistan’s tribal resistance movements have demonstrated a high degree of pragmatism over the years. They tend to consider the implications of what they plan to do carefully before taking action. This operation was no half-assed last minute job of strapping a vest of HE and nails onto a brainwashed adolescent, it was carefully planned and co-ordinated, just like the murder of Murtaza Bhutto, in fact probably better planned than that. This means if it did come from the tribal resistance it came from the top of the clans’ leadership. One comes back to the pragmatic way they have handled amerikan and Pakistani interventions in their country thus far and concludes the pieces just don’t fit.
What exactly would they gain from such a high profile murder? They must have known USuk and the Pakistani government would blame them for this and it would be used as an excuse for even more oppressive murderous interventions in their homelands. On the other hand getting rid of Ms Bhutto could be considered a plus because she was threatening to allow amerikan forces to operate in their country, but would getting rid of her mean the amerikans would anoint a Prime Minister who wouldn’t allow that? Let’s not kid ourselves here, this election will be run in a way that allows only amerika’s favoured selection to win.
Bhutto will be replaced, if and when the ‘election’ occurs by someone who is certain to allow amerika in. So no win there. In fact since BB was a populist she may have said she would give amerika free rein and then bowed to local pressure not to, but who comes next will definitely be amerika’s man. Nawaz Sharif and Imran Khan (Pakistan’s best hope) have both indicated they will boycott the farce.
So if the hit was engineered by the tribal people’s resistance they have shot themselves in the foot. These guys are smart, they have kept many other invading armies out, amerika is the latest after Pakistan central government, the Indian Raj (1936) and before that the British army.
Some people claim that the pathans or pashtuns are descendants of Alexander the Great’s army, and now there is some genetic evidence to support this.
As I have already posted, the assassination just doesn’t shape up as another in the long list of the amerikan empire’s greatest hits. Amerika didn’t have an obvious motive and it is doubtful they have sufficient resources that close to the ground in Pakistan, which is of course, why they want to install a puppet regime.
If the assassination wasn’t a Musharraf project it must have been one of the other Pakistani army/ISI factions, but Musharraf has been showing so much insecurity about his position in the last 12 months (eg locking up the lawyers, sacking the judges and butchering the constitution) that he must have thought BB’s arrival was bad for him, so he had a motive, means (the army and intelligence services) and opportunity (the deliberate or accidental security lapses on that day).
However don’t be surprised if the final j’accuse from BB leaves out accusations against Mushie, The Party will be under considerable pressure to ‘let it go’ and ‘move on’ and once past the yes persons of BB’s immediate coterie there is plenty of naked ambition amongst the talent in the PPP.
So even if the PPP eases up on the accusations, Musharraf remains the most likely candidate for murderer-in-chief

Posted by: Debs is dead | Dec 29 2007 22:50 utc | 9

Who DIDN’T want her dead?
Even half the American Executive (the originators of the scheme) thought she would be more trouble than she was worth.
Or: Condi, I guess.

Posted by: Gaianne | Dec 30 2007 0:06 utc | 10

Paul Woddward seem to be going with the Mush;
By Paul Woodward, War in Context, December 29, 2007
If the Pakistani government is not engaged in a cover-up, they’re certainly doing a good job of making it look like a cover-up. First the crime scene was immediately hosed down removing any evidence. Then, after Benazir Bhutto had been pronounced dead, there was no autopsy. Then, after it had been widely reported that she had died from gun shot wounds, the Pakistan Interior Ministry claimed that she had not been shot — that she had died from a fractured skull resulting from her head hitting a lever.
But now Sherry Rehman, a close aide to Bhutto who bathed her body after her assassination, says, “There was a bullet wound I saw that went in from the back of her head and came out the other side.” And following the verbal testimony now we have the visible evidence: the image of a young man aiming a pistol at Bhutto moments before she died.
Interior Ministry spokesman Javed Iqbal Cheema, says, “This is not an ordinary criminal matter in which we require assistance of the international community. I think we are capable of handling it.” And the White House demurely says, “If Pakistani authorities ask for assistance we would review the request.” In Washington and Islamabad there seems to be much more interest in chanting the al Qaeda mantra than in finding out who was really behind the assassination.
http://warincontext.org/2007/12/29/editorial-the-cover-up/

Posted by: Lysander | Dec 30 2007 1:19 utc | 11

ok, i will take a stab at a totally uneducated guess.
cheneyco likes mush in power (and they are thick as thieves w/the 9/11 coordination) but can’t be seen as being tooo close hence the lukewarm scolding for the (rice visit inspired?)crackdown prior to the following words of support from bush.
coaxing bhutto back to pakistan for her eventual assassination sets up the US appearing to back bhutto and appearing to back some coordinated mush/bhutto ‘balanced’ power but her assassination paves the way for mush to stay in power by default. which was the plan all along.

Posted by: annie | Dec 30 2007 1:35 utc | 12

Is it a coincidence Ms Bhutto was assassinated on the same day as Afghan president
Hafizullah Amin was murdered in 1979 during a Russian coup, in response to the CIA
pre-emptive involvement in creating pre-Qaeda Taliban against a Russian takeover?
?Who but Russian-trained ops could’ve put that kind of military action together,
and wouldn’t that have been perfectly ironic symmetrical payback for Amin’s death?
http://www.afghanland.com/history/communist.html
Karzai just ousted two senior UN officials for talking with the Taliban, and after
Ms Bhutto said she would take (US-backed) action against the Taliban in Pakistan,
maybe that upset the delicate AF balance between Persian north and Pashtun south?
After all, if Taliban were flushed out of Pakistan, they’d head straight for Kabul!
There are plenty of US:UK assassination ops at play, with embedded natives in Paki.
More importantly, like the deliberate “accident” of Princess Diana to divert global attention away from the impending death of Mother Teresa on September 5, 1997, so
as to give Jerry Brown no sympathy leg-up for a feared second run as Cal governor,
whose imminent demise will Ms Bhutto’s death and state funeral serve to eclipse?!
Opposition leader Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan?! Not that Paki’s need another murder:
Four-hour Countrywide Load-Shedding Planned
The power supply situation deteriorated further on Wednesday with peak-hour shortage reaching over 2,000MW, or 20 per cent of the total demand of 10,000MW, an unprecedented level for winter.
Dr Shah’s Food Remedy
Caretaker finance minister Dr Salman Shah’s insistence that Pakistanis should pay the world prices for what they eat is not easy to stomach. He says the food inflation in Pakistan — at 10-11 per cent — is far less than the average hike of 20-25 per cent in world food prices. He asserts the prices will have to be brought at par with the global level sooner than later.
Billions At Risk for Wheat Blight
“This thing has immense potential for social and human destruction.” Startling words – but spoken by the father of the Green Revolution, Nobel laureate Norman Borlaug, they are not easily dismissed.
An infection is coming, and almost no one has heard about it.
The disease is Ug99, a virulent strain of black stem rust fungus (Puccinia graminis), discovered in Uganda in 1999. The strain has spread slowly across east Africa, but in January this year spores blew across to Yemen, and north into Sudan. Scientists who have tracked similar airborne spores in this part of the world say it will now blow into Egypt, Turkey and the Middle East, and on to Pakistan and India, lands where a billion people depend on wheat.
Kinda puts it all into perspective, don’t it?

Posted by: Yankin Yachaen | Dec 30 2007 1:56 utc | 13

More importantly, like the deliberate “accident” of Princess Diana to divert global attention away from the impending death of Mother Teresa
hmm

Posted by: annie | Dec 30 2007 2:53 utc | 14

Sure does. Keep up the good work.

Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Dec 30 2007 2:54 utc | 15

fisk: They don’t blame al-Qa’ida. They blame Musharraf

Question: Who forced Benazir Bhutto to stay in London and tried to prevent her return to Pakistan? Answer: General Musharraf.
Question: Who ordered the arrest of thousands of Benazir’s supporters this month? Answer: General Musharraf.
Question: Who placed Benazir under temporary house arrest this month? Answer: General Musharraf.
Question: Who declared martial law this month? Answer General Musharraf.
Question: who killed Benazir Bhutto?
Er. Yes. Well quite.
You see the problem? Yesterday, our television warriors informed us the PPP members shouting that Musharraf was a “murderer” were complaining he had not provided sufficient security for Benazir. Wrong. They were shouting this because they believe he killed her.

Posted by: b real | Dec 30 2007 5:37 utc | 16

So, b real, Musharraf dropped corruption charges against Bhutto, allowed her into Pakistan, allowed her to run as head of the PPP…in order to kill her, make her a martyr, provoke riots in the streets, and maybe cancel the “elections”…Right?
Why couldn’t he just not let her into the country?

Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Dec 30 2007 5:51 utc | 17

Musharraf dropped corruption charges against Bhutto, allowed her into Pakistan, allowed her to run as head of the PPP. after a severe bout of arm twisting from the state department whose soon to be a nonentity boss is desperately casting around for a legacy alternative to midwife of the illegal invasion of Iraq.
Like the rest of her BushCo counterparts she appears to live in some alternative reality where amerika wins out every time because it is . . . amerika. Thing is no one outside of amerika happens to agree with that assessment and Rice didn’t do the basics of ensuring that Bhutto would be secure once in Pakistan. Remember the discomfit of shrub and Rice when Mush suspended the constitution then put BB under house arrest? They didn’t know whether to shit or shrug their shoulders. That was the the look of a crew who are just beginning to understand the depth of their fuck up.
Not that Rice could have done much anyhow Cheney wouldn’t have provided any of his military to support a Rice plan and since everyone in amerika sat on their hands when Cheney wrested control of most of intelligence from the NSC and State Rice was flying blind.
Mush agreed because the amerikans had already been casting around for alternative conduits for the billions of dollars worth of military aid. The Pakistani armed forces have become hooked on the favours of amerikan military aid just as Latin American countries of a couple of decades ago. He who controls the flow of aid controls the army which controls Pakistan, so Mush had to agree to letting Bhutto back but he was under no illusion.
Amerika had the power to dismiss or leave the Swiss charges hanging over BB’s head and therefore they had control of her, not him nor anyone else in Pakistan.
Obviously that couldn’t be alowed to stand so he did what he did, even anti-Musharraf Pakistanis I have spoken to don’t disagree with him taking the action. The woman had become a foreign agent, a traitor and couldn’t be allowed anywhere near the reins of power.
amerikans may not mind israeli agents running elements of the amerikan government and it may surprise some to hear most nations don’t feel that way. For some people in Pakistan may believe amerika and Pakistan have some commonality of interests at the moment, but those Pakistanis also believe it is their job to decide how common those interests are.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Dec 30 2007 6:53 utc | 18

Debs is dead, do you think Musharraf ordered her assassination?

Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Dec 30 2007 7:16 utc | 19

Anyway, it’s not important to my point, which is that the US is paying the bills for financing the war against the Russians in Afghanistan, and of those bills, the largest invoiced have yet to be presented.
Otherwise, I agree with most of your post, Debs is dead.

Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Dec 30 2007 7:27 utc | 20

Who killed JFK, RFK, or orchestrated 911 attacks…wonder if they’ll have commissions to spew official lies, or skip that part of the show…

Posted by: jj | Dec 30 2007 7:27 utc | 21

I’m wondering if her husband, Asif Ali Zardari may have played a role..
In other words, Did her husband have anything to gain by her being murdered?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Dec 30 2007 7:34 utc | 22

And of course, the invoices for the Iraq invasion are also now due. It’s ironic that ex CIA Robert Gates, who ovesaw the destruction of Russia in Afghanistan in the eighties is now…Bush’s Secretary of Defence. He may be able to provide Rice with some insight…:-)

Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Dec 30 2007 7:37 utc | 23

It’s ironic that ex CIA Robert Gates, who ovesaw the destruction of Russia in Afghanistan in the eighties is now…Bush’s Secretary of Defence.
the hits just keep on comin’

Posted by: annie | Dec 30 2007 8:54 utc | 24

Breaking: Bhutto’s Killing Caught On Camera

New film has emerged showing the moment Benazir Bhutto was assassinated. It shows a gun emerging from the crowd and at least two shots fired – apparently contradicting President Musharraf’s version of the cause of her death. Sky’s Colin Brazier reports.

Don’t know anything about the website but the news report looks legit…

Posted by: Anonymous | Dec 30 2007 12:40 utc | 25

Ahh, the above # 25 was your uncle…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Dec 30 2007 13:05 utc | 26

Bhutto’s Husband And Son Take Charge

The 19-year-old son and husband of assassinated Benazir Bhutto have been appointed co-chairmen of the Pakistani opposition leader’s party.

interesting no?
Also in the vid above I see at least four blasts, hear at least six..what about you guys?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Dec 30 2007 13:33 utc | 27

All speculation of cause de meurtre aside,
here’s how it’s done in Paki Land:
The Last Moments of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
http://www.chowk.com/articles/9370
(paraphrasing)
“After a short pause, she said, as if talking to herself,
“My handlers have messed up this case. Condi is responsible
for my assassination. She kept on telling me all the wrong
things. She has screwed everything up.”
Then she said the USA needed a dead – not an alive – Bhutto.

Posted by: Jump Master | Dec 30 2007 17:31 utc | 28

Yeah B about the attack on Sharif … who knows… I read several people died, this was in a French paper. I haven’t a clue really, and looking up all the accounts I reckon won’t help.
Thrasy at post 4 makes a good point.
Overall, an even more strongly US-affiliated power figure…bad news. Many enemies. Many.
To D. Benazir in that Tv interview made slips of the tongue and was confused and showed that she did not know what she was talking about. (if we are talking about the same thing..)
Maybe no unique culprit – person, group, faction, force – is responsible, but a confluence of interests and confused, hasty, discussions left the road open and no one wanted to stop it, as it was all up in the air, etc. so it happened.
The US/Cia/other usual culprits will not have been involved, contrary to the conspiracy theorist quoted by B. Agreeing with Debs. No way. The US plan was plain to see and the murder is a BIG setback for them. I still think that Mush would not have been so stupid to directly order it, or covertly encourage or wish it. But who am I. Ambiguity and hesitation lead to supposedly surprising results.

Posted by: Tangerine | Dec 30 2007 17:49 utc | 29

I’ve been trying to keep track of Pakistan developments on the Strategytalk forum via IndoPak press reports for months now – here’s the latest, it “names names” and unravels plots:
http://www.strategytalk.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=60156#60156

Posted by: Anonymous | Dec 30 2007 18:07 utc | 30

@Uncle – 27 – Mr 10%, BeeBee’s husband will now “lead” – the 19 year old likely doesn’t know what he is getting into and stays at Oxford. Does he at least speak Urdu or Sindh (BeeBee didn’t really know her home languages, she was only good in English)?
Bhutto’s son, husband to succeed her
The PPP now agreed to elections on the 8th Jan – that means Sharif, the Saudi favorite who called for boycott, is currently out. That is Rice’s work and the Saudis will fume over it.
Expect some serious backslash here …

Posted by: b | Dec 30 2007 19:50 utc | 31

Without links as I am time constrained …
Pakistan delivers about 100% of the fuel the “coalition troops” in Afghanistan need to run their operations.
75% of the logistics, food etc., to U.S. and UK troops in Afghanistan go through Karachi.
There is uproar in Karachi and Pakistan, independent from the current issues, is in a crisis about refineary capacity and lack of fuel.
That’s not in the press, but that is a big part of what the current meddling is about.

Posted by: b | Dec 30 2007 20:01 utc | 32

Benazir Bhutto: US Policy Causes World Terrorism

Benazir Bhutto paid the ultimate price for stating that US imperial policies of propping up tin horn dictators causes world terrorism. She dared to say so. Condemning what she called “A False Choice for Pakistan”, the late Benazir Bhutto laid “terrorism” at the White House doorstep.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Dec 30 2007 21:04 utc | 33

CNN Gets It Wrong, Again
“Bhutto can be seen standing up through her vehicle’s sunroof. After the sound of three gunshots, her headscarf flaps up on her left side and she slumps forward and slides into the car.”
Not really. The “flapping” is a white campaign flag in the distance conflated with her white scarf by the poor quality of the video. Why does this matter?
Flapping to the left might indicate a shooter from the right. Instead, she slumps to the front and to the right, consistent with early reports she was shot in the back of the head. The “flapping left headscarf” hopefully is just typical CNN mis-reportage.
Damn lucky pistol shot from the ground up over the top of a bullet proof car, then down at the level of Bhutto’s neck, which is all she had sticking out the sun roof.
More likely, someone on a balcony, even farther away, behind and to her left (off camera), so nearly fantastical shot with an automatic pistol (pow..pow..pow),
except for the bomb thingey, which bumps it up a notch, into ISI black ops territory.
Anyway, who cares? Bush got his $183,000M, and it’s burning a hole in Dick’s pocket!
May we all live long enough to get just a taste of our tax tithe, before it’s gone.
Hey, Papa throws Holy Water! Maybe Dicky Bird can piss Schlitz down everyone’s back!?

Posted by: Genny Cream | Dec 31 2007 2:20 utc | 34

It’s worse than that Genny Cream…

Truth is, Ms Bhutto, was little more than a back alley Puta. She stole between 1 Billion and Six Billion Bucks from Pakistan. I guess now that the cow has been sacrificed so John McCain, Hilary Clinton and Benito Giggliani could get a little prime time spike before the Tidal Wave of the Revolution washes them back to the gutters from hence their lizard souls were hatched.
The day before there were press releases that our government, and the treason agents in CIA, were loading C-130s with more genocide gear and that the born again hard SS of US special forces were to be released from their leashes on the civilian populace of Pakistan.
And of course as expected, the Media already knows it was Bin and Al KADA and the Taliban – and Lee Harvey and OJ et al et al et al.
As I watched the news yesterday, I was reminded of the scene in V (for Vendetta), while the TV was pouring out germ and war and terror news, where one patron in the bar said to another, “Do you believe this shit?”
Did you ever wonder if Bin Lately is really just another Shen Beit Dog or Navy Seal?
So in death, the prissy missy Bhutto will do for the Fascist Corporate Grocery Clerks (McCain, Obama, Clinton, et al) in death what she would be unable to do when she lost her bid to assure democracy in Pakistan with jack booted ANGLO NATO thugs kicking down doors in Pakistan,
You have to wonder what kind of advisers the the Oxford Primped Ring Bearer had working for her. They must have read the the same PR’s we read. They must have known the gig was up. They must have. Still, the black sacrificial sheep, the false Muslim Madonna, the corrupt Bhutto had to hit the streets, and she took the US/AL KADA / Pakistan Intel bullet so CNN would could make noise and continue to side step the truth of our national war crime.
The same folks that own Bin Laden, own Pakistani Intelligence, the CIA, MI6 and Mossad. The US War and Oil Exchange elite got their contracted hit through the the war kennel hounds our tax dollars buy for them. And Lump Face McCain (the pig of the Gulf of Tonkin), and Billary Clinton and Mitt Rammeupthekazoo, and Obama (a kinder gentler unique fascist) all got their little media spikes.
So in in the end – they got what they wanted because they knew if they waited for the election, she would lose.
There is one thing the Corpo-Fascists have forgot. You get all these busboys on the payroll, like the Ghost of Laden and Pakistan Intel, and you don’t tip them enough, they will spit in your food and you’ll never know it.
Maybe years ago the brass and big boys in the US war crimes factories were smart enough to control their dogs – but they’re about as dumbed down as their supporters now. America is finally in the lose-lose situation we’ve been taught to avoid. Thanks CNN, MSNBC, GE, United Defense, Morgan Stanley, CitiBank, Carlyle Group and the fine Zionist Clerks [s]elected for our Congress!
Word to their mothers – back out while the only thing hung in your ass is a turd. The actions of our government are doing what they intended – we’re borrowing 2 Billion a day to buy a fraudulent war and we the people are extorted with energy costs that are three times fair value. Something is going to give – and 300 Million American Assholes are the last people any 3 piece suited gestapo clerk should ever think about daring to cross the line.
It’s over folks. The proletariat are being priced out beyond their ability to survive. ~chlamor

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Dec 31 2007 3:30 utc | 35

Chlamor…..Word!

Posted by: R.L. | Dec 31 2007 3:54 utc | 36

So who was responsible for the October 18 (I think that is the right date?) attack on her? Surely that has some relevance. (I know nothing about it.)
That the corruption charges were dropped was the work of the US. Not Mush. And the US had planned that for some time, as one of the only serious court cases against her, here in Switz. was set to open one week after she was whisked back to Pakistan in her saintly vaporous white veil.
Debs wrote: she appears to live in some alternative reality where amerika wins out every time because it is . . . amerika. …
Pinkie (her childhood nickname) was very ambitious, partly because of personal characteristics (she has a sister under the radar I read at the dentist) but mostly because of the ‘dynasty’, ‘tradition’ aspect. Support is support, no matter what it is or where it comes from – it is first accepted wholeheartedly and then subsequently dealt with – traded, negotiated, discussed, etc. That is what happened, I suppose. In the West, things go differently.
She wanted to be PM again, third time lucky perhaps!, you forge ahead, that’s it. Her husband had nothing to gain really. The US needs Pakistan and controls it – she was willing. But the upper classes will not have liked that, or her, at all. Mush managed to keep them in big bucks and quiet thru a classical balancing act; Benazir was a menace. The reference to Diana above was not completely loony, though it is a bit of a stretch.

Posted by: Tangerine | Dec 31 2007 18:27 utc | 37

2007.01.01
CIA dir Gates (1991-93) was the Iran-contra scam; idiot paper tiger Turner (1977-81,) arms for hostages Casey (1981-87,) and ben Lauden-Webster (1987-91) were the Afgan bunch. Soviets out of Afgan 15 Feb 1989.

Posted by: bu | Jan 1 2008 22:24 utc | 38

as inferred in *38 – the cia is completely covered in shit in relation to afghanistan & pakistan – so too the state dept & given the track record of the wholly corrupt isi – the americans have as usual profoundly underestimated their enemies
in this the first day of 2008 the u s empire seems to be encercled – with no way out except down into the quicksand of the policies of their own making
rome wasn’t built in a day
neither was the plague

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 1 2008 23:29 utc | 39

Debsisdead #18–
Well argued.

Posted by: Gaianne | Jan 1 2008 23:44 utc | 40

Debsisdead # 18–
Well said.

Posted by: Gaianne | Jan 1 2008 23:47 utc | 41

“On the day she died, Benazir Bhutto planned to hand over to visiting U.S. lawmakers a report accusing Pakistan’s intelligence services of a plot to rig parliamentary elections, sources close to the slain former Pakistani prime minister told CNN Tuesday.
” … ‘Ninety percent of the equipment that the USA gave the government of Pakistan to fight terrorism is being used to monitor and to keep a check on their political opponents,’ the report says.”
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/01/01/pakistan.voterigging/index.html

Posted by: boxcar mike | Jan 2 2008 0:04 utc | 42

Uh, you may want to fill your glass, and sit down for this one…
Bhutto was targeted by laser beam: Report

ISLAMABAD: The controversy over former premier Benazir Bhutto’s assassination has taken another turn with a section of her Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) claiming she was targeted with sophisticated “laser beam technology”.
This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the, Twilight Zone…
Bhutto’s wounds were caused not by bullets but by some sort of laser weapon, The Nation newspaper said quoting sources in the PPP.

Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo…
We just pasted the event horizon. Arlen (single bullet) Specter in Rawalpindi, “laser beam technology”, I’ve said it before, While Ken Kesey will be sorely missed, let’s face it, in a world this twisted who needs fiction?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 4 2008 18:19 utc | 43

Uh, you may want to fill your glass, and sit down for this one…
Bhutto was targeted by laser beam: Report

ISLAMABAD: The controversy over former premier Benazir Bhutto’s assassination has taken another turn with a section of her Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) claiming she was targeted with sophisticated “laser beam technology”.
This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the, Twilight Zone…
Bhutto’s wounds were caused not by bullets but by some sort of laser weapon, The Nation newspaper said quoting sources in the PPP.

Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo…
We just pasted the event horizon. Arlen (single bullet) Specter in Rawalpindi, “laser beam technology”, I’ve said it before, While Ken Kesey will be sorely missed, let’s face it, in a world this twisted who needs fiction?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 4 2008 18:21 utc | 44

Uncle Sam #44–
Maybe somebody mistook the spot of a laser gun-sight for the killing shot itself?

Posted by: Gaianne | Jan 5 2008 1:03 utc | 45

Cocaine. The World.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jan 5 2008 1:11 utc | 46

Yeah, dulling Occam’s Boxcutter…the “principle of parsimony”, has its application, to my mind, mainly in the harder sciences.
More like, Schroedinger’s Cat.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 7 2008 10:38 utc | 47

Good god… there’s spin and then there’s this incoherent babbling: Musharraf: Bhutto to blame for her assassination

About Bhutto’s death, (Musharraf) noted only that the investigation is not completed “and we should not jump to conclusions.”
Still, he added, “if she had not come out of the vehicle, the protected and armored vehicle, maybe we would have seen her smiling face again today.”

So now we know who killed Bhutto: it was apparently suicide. As a bonus, according to the article, John McCain has decided to move his political career from increasingly irrelevant to DOA.

Though Musharraf’s popularity at home has plummeted, he retains support from GOP presidential contender Sen. John McCain.
“I think he’s a good man,” the Arizonan told NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “But I think he’s made mistakes, don’t get me wrong. And we’ve got to move forward with these elections and have them free and fair.
“But I can work with him. He understands the threat to his country that the Taliban and al Qaeda present. And radical Islamic extremists. He’s a very smart man. He’d be one of the first to go. They’ve tried to kill him nine times, OK? Nine times they’ve tried to kill Musharraf. He’s not their favorite guy.”

Monty Python could not have produced a more abjectly stupid portrait of the halls of power. This has moved beyond self-satire. This is now the kind of non sequitur that only unrestrained arrogance can produce.

Posted by: Monolycus | Jan 7 2008 17:33 utc | 48

Right on, Monolycus. If Ron Paul doesn’t launch a third party run (Libertarian) to split the Republican vote (like Perot), I predict the worst of all possible outcomes: President-elect McPain.
W.

Posted by: Wolf DeVoon | Jan 7 2008 17:44 utc | 49

@Wolf DeVoon #49
Honestly, I’m not so worried about McCain. While he’s certainly sophomoric enough to make a populist run, and would represent all the nastiness you fear, he’s proven too many times that he’s just an inept liar.
I’d be far more concerned about Mitt Romney right now… who is both evil to his core and has the weaselish oratory skills to appeal to more than the fratboy demographic.

Posted by: Monolycus | Jan 8 2008 3:44 utc | 50

Two by two, hands of blue… This image represents my deepest fears about the future of the US and the world.
Threadjack over… back to Bhutto.

Posted by: Monolycus | Jan 8 2008 4:01 utc | 51