Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 14, 2007
What’s the word for catfight in Urdu?

Today two remarkable op-eds were published in the U.S. by Pakistani women named Bhutto. Some excerpts of these from the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times:

–WaPo–

I am under house arrest in Lahore, barricaded in by Pakistani police with bayonets.

–LAT–

While she was supposedly under house arrest at her Islamabad residence last week, 50 or so of her party members were comfortably allowed to join her. She addressed the media twice from her garden, protected by police given to her by the state, and was not reprimanded for holding a news conference.

–WaPo–

Despite Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s announcement of a date for parliamentary elections, I doubt that we are in for a change.

–LAT–

Her negotiations with the military and her unseemly willingness until just a few days ago to take part in Musharraf’s regime have signaled once and for all to the growing legions of fundamentalists across South Asia that democracy is just a guise for dictatorship.

–WaPo–

I cautioned the general earlier this year that his election as president by the present parliament was illegal.

–LAT–

It was particularly unappealing of Ms. Bhutto to ask Musharraf to bypass the courts and drop the many corruption cases that still face her in Pakistan. He agreed, creating the odiously titled National Reconciliation Ordinance in order to do so.

–WaPo–

Musharraf knows how to crack down against pro-democracy forces. He is, however, unwilling or unable to track down and arrest Osama bin Laden or contain the extremists.

–LAT–

Ms. Bhutto’s repeated promises to end fundamentalism and terrorism in Pakistan strain credulity because, after all, the Taliban government that ran Afghanistan was recognized by Pakistan under her last government — making Pakistan one of only three governments in the world to do so.


–WaPo–

On top of a litany of assaults on the rule of law, the general has unilaterally amended the Army Act of 1952 to grant the army the power to try civilians in military courts. Courts-martial will operate by military rules in secret, and defendants are not allowed legal representation.

No attempt has been made to differentiate between average citizens and terrorism suspects associated with militant groups. Many believe that these laws were passed to intimidate pro-democracy forces, not to try terrorism suspects. This is the "democracy" that Musharraf envisages.

–LAT–

My father was a member of Parliament and a vocal critic of his sister’s politics. He was killed outside our home in 1996 in a carefully planned police assassination while she was prime minister. There were 70 to 100 policemen at the scene, all the streetlights had been shut off and the roads were cordoned off. Six men were killed with my father. They were shot at point-blank range, suffered multiple bullet wounds and were left to bleed on the streets.

My father was Benazir’s younger brother. To this day, her role in his assassination has never been adequately answered, although the tribunal convened after his death under the leadership of three respected judges concluded that it could not have taken place without approval from a "much higher" political authority.

–WaPo–

Benazir Bhutto, head of the Pakistan People’s Party, was twice elected prime minister of Pakistan. She is under house arrest in Lahore.

–LAT–

Fatima Bhutto is a Pakistani poet and writer. She is the daughter of Mir Murtaza Bhutto, who was killed in 1996 in Karachi when his sister, Benazir, was prime minister.

Quite a farce to watch. Pass the popcorn please.

Comments

It seems to me that Musharraf and Madame Bhutto eat English, sleep English, think English and every aspect of their lives is culturally alienated. In Mexico they would be called “malinchistas” in memory of La Malinche the Indian woman, Cortes’ concubine, that helped him conquer Tenochtitlan.

Posted by: jlcg | Nov 14 2007 17:29 utc | 1

yes they are like the ex dictator of bolivia – the man who left the country for miami – just before morales won the presidency – he could barely speak spanish & was fluent only in english

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 14 2007 17:51 utc | 2

One has to admire the ruthlessness of a Pinochet, who remained “our boy” for life, unlike Saddam Hussein, or Musharraf.

Posted by: Malooga | Nov 14 2007 18:39 utc | 3

not so strange then, friend malooga, that all their boys & girls had nothing but contempt for the democracy they pretend to defend
they are the monsters of monopoly/capital collapsing

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 14 2007 18:53 utc | 4

Fatima’s life is the tragedy. She knows that had her father won the battle with his sister little would have changed for the people of Pakistan yet she is also aware of the depth of depravity to which her aunt has sunk. However much she tries to submerge herself in art in she comes from a highly political background and she sees everything in terms of politics.
Pakistini Islam always had a mysticism more commonly believed to be attached to the sufi of North Africa. The entire Pakistani diaspora weeps at the destruction which has been wreaked upon their society by the greedy and corrupt leaders who know they only have to go to amerika and outbid their competitors in the auction of their people to acquire all the resources they need to tyrannise what they have just sold.
My suspicion is that Pakistan is the battleground which Cheney and Rice have chosen to settle their differences. Rice and the state department put together the ‘bring back Bhutto’ stupidity while the excrebable Cheney squats on the military aid appropriations like the fucking toad he is doling out the billions to keep the Pakistani military tied to Musharref and his golden trough.
What Washington refuses to recognise thus far is that they can give all the money to the military they want, buy every bent pol in Islamabad too, but short of nuking rural Pakistan until no living thing survives they will never persuade the people to go along with their evil blueprint.
The Pakistani military know this only too well which is precisely why this split in the army that has Musharref so concerned happened.
The worst of all this is that when the penny drops and washington realises the weaponry they supplied is being used back at them, those who profited will have long gone, leaving the people who wanted no part of any of this behind to face the willy pete, rape and murder of amerika’s ‘boys’.
As each day passes and the area of ‘destabilisation’ increases one is left wondering how big it must get before amerikan leaders recognise they have truly fucked up.
It won’t stop at Pakistan, if that nation is destroyed India will be next. The Islamic people of India, most of whom have relations in Pakistan won’t sit idly and watch this.
They have genuine grievances stemming from decades of discrimination and violence against their community. (cranked up by the brits in the days of the Raj who thrived on divide and rule)
The Indian central government steps in and quells the periodic anti-Islamic pogroms that run through India’s slums since to leave it be would be to invoke the wrath of Pakistan.
If that concern is dissipated the hindu fundamentalist pols could make the mistake of letting a riot go on too long in which case the top half of India (where amerika is busy investing billions) could explode in a firestorm of ethnic and religious conflict.
Does amerika stop there or do they stoke that too until India self-immolates?

Posted by: Debs is dead | Nov 14 2007 20:19 utc | 5

mullah cimoc say tribal elders in waziristan all say same thing.
look like benazir working as agent in place for western intel. cia and british seeking to depose musharaff (or chastize severely him ) for refuse commiting the war crime against him tribal people in NWFP.
this walking coup all the concoct in washington dc and him cia agent write the script.
neocon spy in whitehouse and pentagon him wanting benazir for puppet while cia control all and mass the murder of the tribes.
usa media so control for keep usa people the ignorant. but usa be punish even now. him daughter take the LBT (low back tattoo) and slut have him sex with every man, even usa gang member. this the true punish for ameriki let wicked to killing so many people of middle east.

Posted by: mullah cimoc | Nov 14 2007 21:19 utc | 6

mullah cimoc say tribal elders in waziristan all say same thing.
look like benazir working as agent in place for western intel. cia and british seeking to depose musharaff (or chastize severely him ) for refuse commiting the war crime against him tribal people in NWFP.
this walking coup all the concoct in washington dc and him cia agent write the script.
neocon spy in whitehouse and pentagon him wanting benazir for puppet while cia control all and mass the murder of the tribes.
usa media so control for keep usa people the ignorant. but usa be punish even now. him daughter take the LBT (low back tattoo) and slut have him sex with every man, even usa gang member. this the true punish for ameriki let wicked to killing so many people of middle east.

Posted by: mullah cimoc | Nov 14 2007 21:26 utc | 7

A somewaht droll aspect of comments on Pakistan is the repeated naming of their Northern territories as the North West frontier. That designation may have been correct when the viceroy resided in Calcutta but now the “North West of Pakistan” happens to be the North East. Check the map. The colonial mind is hard to ventilate.

Posted by: jlcg | Nov 14 2007 22:54 utc | 8

@jclg I had thoughts along similar lines but as you can see here the NWFP nomenclature is still common within Pakistan.
I can remember visiting my first wife’s family in Chandigarh, they were very Indian Army but had all the cliches of the english army of a generation before.
This was in the 70’s yet everyone spoke english in that disgusting received english accent made famous by the likes of Olivier and Richardson.
They played bridge every afternoon, sipped tea and ‘dropped by the club’ every evening. They had become caricatures of that which India had so despised.
Thankfully most of that has gone from all nations of the sub-continent now but the last vestiges remain in relics like NWFP which has become so entrenched in the language that few ever consider it’s origin.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Nov 15 2007 0:10 utc | 9

Does anyone know if the recent flurry of activity surrounding a planned gas pipeline from Iran to Pakistan and India is related to the internal strife? It is not clear to me why Musharraf became so unacceptable so fast, it’s been the same story for 6 years. This might explain it.
just google-newsing pakistan pipeline gets the material.
google news
For example:
UPI article

Posted by: boxcar mike | Nov 15 2007 2:25 utc | 10

The question is whether Musharref really has become that unacceptable or whether Bhutto is playing Rice and the State department. Pipeline stories come and go. Remember even now the settlement the amerikan administration appears to be working for is some sort of a compromise between Bhutto and Musharref something Bhutto appeared to be perfectly happy with even in the first few days after the declaration of the state of emergency.
However he has probably come to realise that not only does Musharref have no intention of ‘sharing’ power (neither for that matter does she), that her association with Musharref is doing incredible damage to her own political viability.
She had been defeated the last couple of times she ran for election in Pakistan prior to her going on the lam to avoid corruption charges, so although she may seem like a good bet with Washington since they can hold the Swiss and French charges over her, she wasn’t exactly flavour of the month with Pakistanis.
Any support she may have outside of PPP loyalists is solely due to her being an alternative to Musharref. A Bhutto /Musharref package would be a pretty unattractive proposition to voters. Most likely a lot less attractive than either of them on their own would be.
Bhutto may not have realised the extent of public antipathy towards a Musharraf/Bhutto administration until she had been back in Pakistan for a time. She has been gone for a long period and would have had plenty of catching up to to.
There is one other scenario.
This article from an October Asia Times describes the proposed withdrawal of Pakistani troops from the ‘tribal areas’:

Once a smooth transition of government is completed, the demands of the militants for a complete withdrawal of Pakistani forces from the tribal areas will be met and a ceasefire agreement between the security forces and the Taliban is likely by November.
At the moment, talks between the Taliban and coalition forces in Afghanistan are stalled because of Pakistan’s internal situation. However, Taliban sources signal that ceasefire agreements are expected by the winter in southwestern Afghanistan, after which talks for a political settlement will start. In the coming few months, as the changes in Pakistan take place, no major offensives are anticipated in Afghanistan, beyond unplanned skirmishes.

As I said upthread maybe factions in Washington don’t go along with this State department sponsored solution.
A political settlement with the Taleban is unlikely to play well with Dick Cheney and the chicken hawks who like to talk tough when others are doing the dying.
Bhutto may be claiming to have found a general prepared to keep the Pakistan Army fighting.
If she has she has been blinded by her cupidity. Victory for central government in the short term is totally unrealistic and more likely to destroy the fighting fitness of the army which has been plagued by suicides and desertions, than defeat the Pathan warriors.
A Musharraf concerned about losing control of his army before donning the uncontested presidency would explain the last 10 days of seeming insanity.
If his control was absolute he wouldn’t have given a toss about being in limbo for a few days. If the supreme court had denied him the presidency he could flick his fingers and demand the army claim it for him.
Yet that isn’t one of his options. Neither is continuing as military boss, it is the prez gig he is most insistent on so maybe he knows he has too many enemies in the army.
At least one of which has done a deal with Bhutto and amerika. Bhutto undertakes to give this general the boss gig and amerika undertakes keep the billions flowing, in return for which the general keeps the army off Bhutto’s case while sending the kids off to kill and be killed in the tribal areas, thereby protecting Bush and Cheney from the indignity of having to reach an accomodation with the Taliban until both have gone from office.
Thereby leaving a nice exploding present for the incoming dem prez.
That sounds about right. The political ambitions of a nation are stymied, tens of thousands of innocents die so that Bhutto can add to her billions while keeping her ass outta jail and Bush and Cheney avoid the consequences of their selfish stupidity once again.
Oh and Rice ends up with a big plate of nothing to show for her machinations which should be a lesson from the rethugs to anyone considering to give a big job to a black or a woman.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Nov 15 2007 4:04 utc | 11

Coup announcement – NYT: U.S. Is Looking Past Musharraf in Case He Falls

Several senior administration officials said that with each day that passed, more administration officials were coming around to the belief that General Musharraf’s days in power were numbered and that the United States should begin considering contingency plans, including reaching out to Pakistan’s generals.

Officials involved in the discussions in Washington said the Bush administration remained wary of the perception that the United States was cutting back-room deals to install the next leader of Pakistan. “They don’t want to encourage another military coup, but they are also beginning to understand that Musharraf has become part of the problem,” said one former official with knowledge of the debates inside the Bush administration.

Pakistan’s cadre of elite generals, called the corps commanders, have long been kingmakers inside the country. At the top of that cadre is Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, General Musharraf’s designated successor as army chief. General Kayani is a moderate, pro-American infantry commander who is widely seen as commanding respect within the army and, within Western circles, as a potential alternative to General Musharraf.

Other experts argue that pressure could build on General Musharraf if the corps commanders believed that the president’s actions threatened the $1 billion in annual aid Washington provides to Pakistan’s military.

Posted by: b | Nov 15 2007 8:15 utc | 12

This whole Pakistani story is opaque and also typical. It looks like Mush. began to have public problems with the Fiasco of the Red Mosque, the storming of it I mean. Why exactly the storming happened is mysterious, there was one article in the International Herald Tribune that claimed that the Chinese ordered it. (Article gone, or I couldn’t find it with a quick google. Maybe I’ll look again..) Then there is the mess with the Supreme Court…but see boxcar mike above, etc.
What is curious is that the opposition to Mush. is upper class – lawyers, biz ppl and the like – the ppl who prospered under his rule – Poverty has risen and risen under Mush. So what gives? Are their actions an anticipatory move – Mush is weakened, discredited, and lets try to save what we can of a regime that favors us? Or is just a wave of disgruntlement without any clear purpose?
The ‘people’ aren’t moving, except trivially to support the Bhutto daughter. That is quite comprehensible – what is the alternative? Who has something to propose? All these corrupt ppl have been around for what, 25 years? I’m sure too that the feeling that Pakistan has endlessly catered to the US without return, that the US is not a credible or fair ally, plays a part. And now, to boot, India is the new darling…
The US needs Pakistan, its ports and airfields (for Afgh. Mush had not choice after 9/11…) The Pakistan army and the Pentagon have been close thru thick and thin. (?) How on earth the US imagines it can fix the situation by championing and re-instating Benazir as counter balance (claiming, as per usual, it has restored democracy) is a total mystery. Benazir wants to be PM for the third time, Mush wants to be the Big Pres; there is no way these ppl will share power. (Well I may eat my words ..) Benazir will try to make alliances, including with ‘Islamists’, so called, though that will probably be down played in the Western Press or given the usual spin.

Posted by: Tangerine | Nov 15 2007 18:02 utc | 13

here is what i read, didn’t re-read it now so…:
“Letter from China: Mosque siege reveals the Chinese connection” IHT, July 12 2007.
link

Posted by: Tangerine | Nov 15 2007 18:07 utc | 14

What is curious is that the opposition to Mush. is upper class – lawyers, biz ppl and the like – the ppl who prospered under his rule
The only people to hit the streets were the lawyers and those are not the rich ones. Still – why didn’t they had any support?
The army commanders are those who gained the most under Musharraf. I doubt they will drop him as the U.S. now hopes.
Another foreign policy mess from the Rice department …

Posted by: b | Nov 15 2007 18:25 utc | 15

China Hand

I think we can see the outline of America’s deal with Musharraf. He gets the presidency, Bhutto becomes prime minister, and the army goes to Kayani, who seems willing to play ball with Bhutto and the United States and, hopefully, get even more confrontational with Taleban and al-Qaeda forces.
So Bhutto gets her graft charges dropped, the law banning her third term is overturned, and she’s able to return to Pakistan and operate freely within the country–an opportunity she’s taking the fullest advantage of.
Musharraf designates Kayani, his natural successor, as military strongman, gets ready to assume the presidency, but wait! gets left high and dry because the Supreme Court isn’t ready to certify Musharraf as President.
Musharraf opts for the quick fix: a state of emergency and a packed Supreme Court ready to declare him president.
Then Bhutto says Musharraf has to give up the presidency, and the Bush administration looks more interested in being seen supporting Pakistani democracy than Musharraf.
In other words, Musharraf went through with the deal…only to learn that the deal might end up not involving him.
Funny about that.
And now the Bhutto strategy relies–both for its basic viability and, more importantly, for its credibility with the United States—on securing support of the army through Kayani, even though he just saw his boss getting screwed.
You can almost hear Bhutto’s group fuming, Just mount the fricking coup, for goodness sakes.
Wonder how much longer before we hear about “America’s declining patience” with Kayani for declining to resolve Pakistan’s political crisis with another coup?

Posted by: b | Nov 16 2007 6:13 utc | 16

A friend of mine tells me that it’s an open secret that Benazir has struck a deal with the US (or at least with SOME in the US govt)– that if she gets back into power with US help she’ll let American troops onto Pakistani soil to go after Bin Ladin. This friend knows parts of the ME and reads several languages. Is this possibly true? I’ve not heard this elsewhere, even on the blogs. It would explain a few things, but it could also be Musharraf disinfo.

Posted by: the exile | Nov 19 2007 4:21 utc | 17

@the exile – I am sure Bhutto has a deal with Washington – we just don’t know what it inlcudes – U.S. troops though seem to be a certain element?
U.S. Hopes to Arm Pakistani Tribes Against Al Qaeda

A new and classified American military proposal outlines an intensified effort to enlist tribal leaders in the frontier areas of Pakistan in the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban, as part of a broader effort to bolster Pakistani forces against an expanding militancy, American military officials said.
If adopted, the proposal would join elements of a shift in strategy that would also be likely to expand the presence of American military trainers in Pakistan, directly finance a separate tribal paramilitary force that until now has proved largely ineffective and pay militias that agreed to fight Al Qaeda and foreign extremists, officials said.

It always starts with these socalled “military trainers” …

Posted by: b | Nov 19 2007 6:34 utc | 18

talking w/ a friend whose family & friends still live in pakistan & he says they’re all wondering exactly how bhutto thinks she can run when the constitution explicitly denies her from another shot at it. i suppose, given the seemingly complete disregard for constitutional authority at the top links in the u.s. these days, that this poses lesser problems at the moment for getting their candidate into power. however, i can’t imagine that it’d resonate very well w/ most public opinion throughout the globe to see the constitution trampled upon to force such a corrupt individual back on the pakistan peoples, which is probably why her ineligibility to run hardly comes up in most coverage.

Posted by: b real | Nov 19 2007 19:59 utc | 19