Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 27, 2007
The Annapolis Production

After weeks of talks Abbas and Olmert have agreed to continue to talk.

This, and lots of photos, is the result of the Annapolis conference:

"We agree to immediately launch good-faith bilateral negotiations in order to conclude a peace treaty resolving all outstanding issues, including all core issues without exception, as specified in previous agreements," it continued. "We agree to engage in vigorous, ongoing and continuous negotiations and shall make every effort to conclude an agreement before the end of 2008."

Why one needs to agree to "immediately launch" talks when one is continuously talking was not explained:

The agreement was reached after weeks of intense negotiations and it was not clear until Bush stepped to the podium in the majestic Memorial Hall at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., that the two sides would come together on how to move forward on the path toward peace.

When Bush stepped away from the podium that wasn’t clear either.

The Jerusalem Post catches a bit of atmosphere:

In what seemed like a maximal effort to lend pomp and drama to the occasion, the Israeli and Palestinian delegations helicoptered to the US Naval Academy, rather than simply making the hour’s drive from Washington where they had been staying. They arrived in two sets of helicopters, five minutes apart, with Abbas and his team’s choppers landing first in the crisp Maryland sunshine. Walking the few yards from helicopter to waiting motorcade, Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni at least had the decency to look a little embarrassed by the production.

Yesterday Bush also spoke of a democratic Palestinian state. That of course, would be a state where Hamas wins the elections. We are thereby assured that Bush meant Abbas will rule just as democratic as Musharraf does in Pakistan.

For a good start Abbas forbade all protest against the Annapolis conference in the West Bank and, at a rally in Hebron, his security service killed a protester.  Gaza meanwhile is awaiting an all out attack by Israel. The one and a half million people there have run out of basic medical supplies and 85% of them now depend on UN food handout. The string of daily assassinations in Gaza continues. In the last 24 hours Israel killed at least four people within the "unoccupied" ghetto.

After the pep-talk Bush left the show in Annapolis. All 50 nations and organisations there will now have a full day to introduce themselves. If they really work some stringent 8 hours, each party will have 9.6 minutes to read off some declaration nobody will listen to.

Tomorrow then will come the "most important meeting" as an Olmert mouthpiece characterized it:  Discussions between Olmert and Bush on when to attack Iran.

The planing and waiting for the conference had constapiated other developments in the Middle East. With the event over, the shit is now ready to hit the fan.

Lebanon is living in a political limbo and, unless some compromise is found in the next three days, may end up in another civil war. Israel will turn off electricity for Gaza starting December 2. An all out attack is likely to follow soon afterwards. Abbas returns with empty hands and will not be greated as victor when he comes back to Ramallah. Olmert will face further criminal investigations and his cabinet may fall apart for coming back from Annapolis with empty hands too.

What follows Annapolis is unlikely to be peace.

Comments

Brilliant summary.

Posted by: Bea | Nov 27 2007 18:12 utc | 1

Dogs, ponies and helicopters oh my. What an absurd farce.
And who takes this blood soaked war criminal Shrub or this sneering thug Olmert seriously as peacemakers?

Posted by: ran | Nov 27 2007 18:38 utc | 2

We should, maybe, add the coming Turkish-Kurdish pissing contest in Northern Iraq, and Musharraf’s demise followed by some nasty Pakistani infighting.
BushCo will have managed to have brought complete mayhem and bloodbath between the whole area between Mediterranea and India. Fucking brilliant mission accomplished.

Posted by: CluelessJoe | Nov 27 2007 19:40 utc | 3

This may have been posted before, old history, but worth re reading for flavor:
** Following is a transcript of the Oct. 22, 1992 conversation with President David Steiner of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) recorded without his knowledge by New York businessman Haim (Harry) Katz. Its existence was first revealed to the Washington Times and its release triggered Steiner’s resignation.**
wrmea com

Posted by: Tangerine | Nov 27 2007 19:40 utc | 4

Did anyone captured Slovenia’s statement at the conference? We know Slovenia took part in it. But I can’t find its statement. Help me.

Posted by: b | Nov 27 2007 19:51 utc | 5

This is not just coincidently: Oil Falls More Than $2 on Increased Saudi Arabian ProductionCrude oil fell more than $2 a barrel in New York after Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, Ali al-Naimi, said the country increased production to the highest this year.

Posted by: b | Nov 27 2007 20:02 utc | 6

as diplomacy it could not be any more depraved

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 27 2007 22:08 utc | 7

LOL. Slovenia’s statement! The fucking BBC world service coverage this morning featured an interview with a zionist former british ambassador to Israel (I suppose it should be no surprise that the bliar would appoint a staunch zionist to represent england in Israel. Heaven forfend the bloke may imagine he should be prioritising england’s interests over Israel’s – the Israelis would be most upset at that obviously ‘anti-semitic behaviour’)
Anyway when asked to comment on Iran’s absence this staunch representative of Britain commented “Why should Iran be here? Israel is none of their business.”
Yeah right Iran just has to live close by this western generated chaos, what business exactly of the British Slovenian or amerikan governments is the illegal occupation of Palestine by zionists, if it is no business of Iran’s?
I don’t know why I get transfixed by the Beeb it’s masochism of the worst sort really. The night before some amerikan journalist (once occasional newsweek correspondent, Michael Goldfarb appears to be a journalist without a journal atm) dragged out the new riposte for when the power of the AIPAC lobby in amerika is an issue.
“Yes” he says, “the Israeli diaspora has a lobby in the US, and the arab diaspora has a lobby in Europe, they balance each other out.”
Firstly I was unaware that AIPAC was a contrivance of the Israeli diaspora. Surely it stemmed from zionist elements of the jewish diaspora, but I suppose Goldfarb imagines all Jews are Israelis at heart. Secondly Arabs, in particular Palestinian refugees, however much Goldfarb may not like that term, do speak out against Israel’s murderous regime in europe in way they daren’t in amerika, lest they be drowned in the stampede of those demanding their deportation or dismissal, while calling them nazis, anti-semites, sand-niggers and ragheads. They are just disparate voices amongst many others in Europe.
Europe has no special sway with the Palestinian people in the same way that amerika has with Israel. that is amerika could stop Israel’s aggression overnight if they chose. One of the reasons they don’t is AIPAC’s vote buying of pols.
Nevertheless it felt like the ‘they do it too’ finger pointing and childish response from Goldfarb was a ‘tester’ this is the sort of ‘light-hearted’ way that discussions of the treasonous acts of some members of AIPAC will be dismissed by AIPAC defenders.
I fucking hate it. These low lifes are spending their whole existence spinning the world’s tragedies for their own selfish and frequently shallow ends, and when anyone criticizes that, no matter how passionately and sincere they are, their point of view is dismissed as being as false and facile as the spinners.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Nov 28 2007 3:57 utc | 8

Well I couldn’t find Slovenia’s historic and world-changing statement, but I did locate full texts of the Bush, Abbas and Olmert statements, as well as the joint statement (which was only signed about 2 minutes before Bush went out to read it), for anyone who is interested in parsing the details.
They can be accessed here.

Posted by: Bea | Nov 28 2007 12:43 utc | 9

Slovenia:
“Rupel ((FM. degrees from Essex, Lubliana, and Brandeis, employed by Queens CAN, NY school for social research, and Cleveland U, see wiki)) said his main interest was what this meant for the Slovenian EU presidency in the first half of 2008. “I think we are looking at a continuation of this dialogue and that things will not be resolved,” he said. He expressed the hope that the Annapolis conference would be successful, but he thinks a lot of work will be left “not only for Slovenia but also for the French and those succeeding them” at the helm of the EU. In any case, “the creation of a new state in the Middle East will be neither simple nor cheap,” he added.
link
there wasn’t an official statement. afaik.
here he is in a keynote speech in London in July 2007:
During its presidency, Slovenia will advocate a continuation of enlargement – particularly with Western Balkan nations. By the same token, we promote intensified relations with our Eastern European and Mediterranean neighbours in the framework of a strengthened European Neighbourhood policy. Our priorities will be also: energy security and dialogue between cultures.
The EU should stabilize its southern flank by bringing in, as soon as possible, the countries of the South-East: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, FYROM-Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia (including Kosovo). Anyway, such was the commitment of the 2003 EU summit in Thessaloniki, Greece. The 15 members of the pre-enlarged EU then confirmed that the future of the Region lied in the EU. The time is now ripe for this strategy to be up-dated and up-graded.
We should start thinking of the South-East Europe as an opportunity, not as a burden. This is a rich region: not just in tourist and cultural attractions, but also in energy connections and human resources. Here are passing traditional and modern ways to the Eastern Mediterranean. We need to fill the gap between Slovenia and Greece sooner rather than later – or risk to pay a much higher bill in the future.
link

Posted by: Tangerine | Nov 28 2007 18:37 utc | 10

Here is another brilliant summary of the post-Annapolis situation from Jeff Halper of ICAHD. Really worth reading if you want to understand the peace process game from Israel’s POV.

Posted by: Bea | Nov 28 2007 19:28 utc | 11

Thanks Bea @11 – I can really recommand that link – so true …

Posted by: b | Nov 28 2007 20:13 utc | 12

Here is another link that is invaluable for understanding the situation. ICAHD has put together a very comprehensive summary of what it calls the Matrix of Control The site explains, in a way that few are able to articulate or understand, why peace in Israel-Palestine requires dismantling the Matrix of Control, above and beyond any requirement of territory. I think that this information is what is really needed to understand why “peace” is not likely to come to that area in our lifetimes.
I almost wish we could have a permanent link to this here.
Whenever you read about a “peace process” in the future, ask yourself just this one guiding question: Would this “process” significantly contribute to dismantling the Matrix of Control described here? If not, then it is not a genuine attempt at peace but rather an attempt to give the appearance of wanting peace while in fact remaining in complete, asphyxiating, unrelenting, crushing control.

Posted by: Bea | Nov 28 2007 20:26 utc | 13

Mafia like systems require victims.
A target group…. Victims must be marginalized, ignored, utlimately killed, wiped off the map. That is an aim in itself, independently of who/where/why. Power of that type must act, and it will focus on the weak, or those whom a majority consider dispensable or nefarious… The Palestinians are the sacrificial victims.
Europe gives (gave) money, the Arab states, more realistic, offer deals (recognition of Israel against a viable Palestinian state), money as well … but nobody will examine borders, walls, agriculture, the economy, or the UN resolutions. The talk is all about extremism and moderates and ‘DA’ road map (not one step of it ever implemented, due in part to endless Israeli objections, written conditions, etc. ), terrorism, and so on, endless empty guff… what many, particularly in the US, forget or prefer to blank out, is that all this scares the hell out of practically everyone. Which is part of the point.
The Israel – Palestinian conflict is hyped as an exceptional, desperate, historical, etc. conflict, that just k-aint be resolved. Meanwhile the whole body of International law is thrown in the toilet, and arguments are reduced to housewife TV level – terrorists, good guys and bad guys, the need for peace and democracy, the horror of rockets, green clawed terrarists, child bombers, etc. etc.

Posted by: Tangerine | Nov 29 2007 19:24 utc | 14