Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 12, 2007
Strikes

It is good to see that strikes are back in fashion. They are the best, and often the only way, people can demand their fair share of the productivity they bring to the market.

In Hollywood the Writers Guild of America is on strike to get a fair share of the revenue stream that will come through Internet distribution of their work.

In New York the stage workers are trying to protect their hard-won benefits by shutting down shows.

Huge railway and student strikes are planned this week in France to fight against Sarkozy’s neo-liberal attack on pensions and on University financing.

In Germany locomotive drivers and train conductors are in on and off strikes to get better payment.

In Ireland bus drivers are on strike over new imposed working condictions that in effect require them to do longer hours.

In South Africa construction workers fight for better wages too.

In Australia union workers are striking to have the union be the sole worker representative at a big brewery.

In all the above cases the media reports are heavily slanted against the workers. Strikes are "bad for small business", they are "inconvient" to those who do not get the service, they are "unfair", "untimely", "not justified". The demands are always "excessive".

Don’t believe any of it without checking what the striking workers really say and what the strike really is about. The media owners have no interest in presenting a fair picture of any strike and, unless they strike themselves, journalists don’t dare to cross their employers intent.

If you can, visit workers on a picket line. Bring them coffee and some supporting words. Striking is not easy to do. It requires sacrifice and no one I have ever met really likes to go on strike.

Unions are the bastions that indirectly defend every other wage owner. Strikes are the only real weapon wage owners have. Let’s hail their use.

Comments

Strikes do nothing, intelligent sabotage and boycott do all.

Posted by: a friend | Nov 12 2007 18:14 utc | 1

@a friend – How do you bring a conflict over wages to some conclusion? By sabotage and boycott? Who is to boycott what in a steel mill?
Who will negotiate on the workers side? Who organizes? The people who sabotage and boycott?

Posted by: b | Nov 12 2007 18:34 utc | 2

…and as deep as the world sinks into corporate democracies, more important are this kind of attitudes, of not lowering the head, i mean…

Posted by: rudolf | Nov 12 2007 18:56 utc | 3

pinochet’s chile & thatcher’s england remain the base from which the elites attack all forms of defence of the working class – whether it is a trade union, medical aid or legal rights. the union movement has a real & honourable history – but the ‘professionalisation’ of that movement (something that began in employing university graduates as officials, for example – an absence of workers education, another) & its obediance to modernity in the end turned out to be fatal comprimises
a workers power is & remains – their labour
in the 70’s it became clear that all the advances that had been made by the union movement, the womans movement, pedagogy – were going to go against sustained attack. in every country where these movements expressed either a real or jurisprudential power – they were dismantled & destroyed. often illegally – as was the case of the miners & the printers in englan & the dockers in australia
the union movement has often been the only guarantor of the equalities that have already been fought for. once that movement was dismantled – then the attack on housing, health & education followed
labour = unit. & for the elites this unit possesses neither interiority or humanity
it is the same way imperialism deals with the ‘other’ – for all intents & purposes they do not exist, neither their past especially their present & certainly not their future
that is what latin america is teaching us today. it is not an accident that morales is a union leader. the people have finally had enough – of non-being, of having their history(ies) defiled & their futures bankrupted by the greed of those who have too much already
these people are saying no & more & more that is the case. i am less optimistic about the west because its states are maintained by fear & the union movement has become so comprimised by those who rule from the roll of dollars
i am sure here that sarkozy wants a large fight – as thatcher did – so that he can unleash all the forces of the state against them

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 12 2007 19:00 utc | 4

In France, ppl are saying that the only arm against Sarkozy is strikes.
On the one hand, strikes are the only way to make the PTB hesitate and retreat. If the minions prefer to suffer or starve – that is a real and major threat. Bush may move to Patagonia, but he will be facing the same problems there.
On the other, local strikes here and there about one or the other thing, may have positive result for the striking group, or may not, and may lead to more repression which does not necessarily wake others up and make them indulge in over the board solidarity. It is footsie-footsie, play the game, get what you can…
I am all for it. If it becomes the ‘fashion’ in 2008, that is positive.
However, striking is a blunt instrument. It offers no alternative beyond strident demands to maintain the status quo (French students) or better pay (American script writers), in terms of take home pay, advantages, status, gvmt. subsidies, etc. As a measure situated in the present it is fine, but just like the opponents the strikers face, long term analysis is dead in the water.
Strikes have to be really massive to have effect, beyond obtained concessions to some group, before history moves on and ditches them. And today the demands have to go beyond the usual: pay raise, worker protection, health coverage, for x group, the employees of y company, etc. etc.
One might expect that striking will rise as the pieces of the pie that can be shared in the West shrink. With each group shouting for their own advantages.
The PTB will tolerate this only for a short while.

Posted by: Tangerine | Nov 12 2007 19:01 utc | 5

Writers Guild of America 1
stage workers 2
Huge railway 3
student strikes 4
locomotive drivers and train conductors 5
bus drivers 6
construction workers 7
7 strikes, wait and see

Posted by: a friend | Nov 12 2007 19:12 utc | 6

Much as I dislike Sarkozy, is it true that state employees in France (pilots, trains drivers etc) can retire at 50 with full state benefits?

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Nov 12 2007 22:25 utc | 7

cloned – that is exactly the way thatcher began her slaughter – that the printing guilds were in fact a mafia who dishonoured trade unions & once she isolated that union she began the demolition job on the next. the same is the case here
everything that has been fought for since the popular front is under attack

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 13 2007 1:11 utc | 8

I visited the Crowne Plaza Hotel in NYC this weekend on Times Square. The stage workers one strike had the Scab Rat out as their inflatable mascot. It’s made a lot of appearances for $560.00 a day rental. That’s not a lot when split between a few hundred employees. But I want to see it on Bush’s dude ranch glaring at him. Here’s the rat at a west coast appearance:
Link to Scab Rat Photo

Posted by: Diogenes | Nov 13 2007 2:31 utc | 9

Here here.
Solidarity for ever.

Posted by: johnf | Nov 13 2007 7:51 utc | 10

Go WGA, and all the others. I know it is not an easy thing to do.
I also await the first strike against “climate destabilisation” (c) deanader. Which could be architects, builders, housebuyers for a start as 30% UK C02 emissions come from construction…

Posted by: Dismal Science | Nov 18 2007 16:41 utc | 11