|
OT 07-76
Open thread … please leave some news or views …
b @17
there’s no mention of AFRICOM in the stories i’ve reviewed on the navy’s success in tackling the “pirate” menace, and since that new command is barely a fledgling, the (dis)info campaign is coming from somewhere else.
one of the earliest rpts i saw mentioned the possibility that the hijacking of the korean vessel was part of a business dispute, but i cannot find that particular article now. more recent ones, as you posted, now imply that.
the first two stories that shabelle media ran on the 30th state that the ship was hijacked by somali troops after the cargo have been delivered & offloaded.
A cargo ship hijacked off Mogadishu main port
Mogadishu 30, Oct.07 ( Sh.M.Network)- A big Korean cargo ship charted by Somali businessmen has been reported to have been hijacked off Somali seaport overnight.
Officials from Mogadishu seaport confirmed to Shabelle Radio that the Korean Ship has been hijacked by Somali guards at the harbor after it had offloaded the load it was carrying include sacks of sugar from Brazil.
…
It is not yet clear why the cargo ship has been hijacked.
US Navy saves North Korean hijacked vessel off Somali coast
It was hijacked by Somali security men overnight who were protecting the vessel.
The security officials at seaport identified as the vessel as MV DI Honga Dan, it was hijacked after it had been offloaded.
The reason of the hijacking is not yet clear.
on thursday shabelle media ran the following story
Somali businessman says, MV DAIN HONGO DAN was hijacked by Somali Seaport security Guards
The agent of MV DAIN HONG DAN which was recently hijacked from Mogadishu International Port strongly declared that the hijackers of the Korean Vessel were from Mogadishu seaport security Guards.
Businessman Gabow said before, the TFG took over the Ctrl of the seaport, the business men had security guards, but after the Government handed the control of the port the accountability of the Security run by the government and the hijackers of DAIN HONGO DAN were soldiers from Mogadishu seaport guards assigned by the Government.
…
The words of the trader came after a ship was hijacked unexpectedly from Mogadishu seaport and said the pirates were not from any were else, but right from Government seaport security forces.
now the ugandan peacekeeping forces have been based at the port in mogadishu for awhile, and forces from the somali govt military are there too.
see, for instance, this story date october 23rd
Mogadishu port under attack, teeming with troops
The AU forces are based at Mogadishu port where they help secure the delivery of humanitarian aid.
…
Meanwhile, more Somali troops joined their comrades at the Mogadishu port after Mogadishu Mayor Mohamed “Dheere” Omar demanded yesterday that government troops return to their barracks.
…
The AU peacekeeping mission, that safeguards the port, has not commented on the Somali troops surrounding the vicinity of the port or the new reinforcements.
Heavily armed soldiers backed by armored vehicles were visible around the port throughout the day, our correspondent reported.
one of the things that the TFG did when it moved into mogadishu was to reclaim the port from a private businessman. since then, the volume of ship hijackings have increased.
in an oct 16th article that i pointed out in the last AFRICOM thread, we read that
Piracy increase off Somalia may be due to collapse of Islamic group
Piracy off Somalia is on the rise because an Islamic group that had cracked down on pirates was ousted, an official who tracks piracy cases off Africa’s side of the Indian Ocean said Tuesday.
Earlier Tuesday, an international watchdog reported maritime pirate attacks worldwide shot up 14 percent in the first nine months of 2007, with Somalia and Nigeria showing the biggest increases.
Attacks rose rapidly in Somalia to 26 reported cases, up from only 8 a year earlier, the International Maritime Bureau said in its report. Some hijackings have turned deadly — pirates complaining their demands had not been met killed a crew member a month after seizing a Taiwan-flagged fishing vessel in May off the northeastern coast of Somalia.
Somali pirates even targeted vessels on humanitarian missions, such as the MV Rozen that was hijacked in February soon after it had delivered food aid to northeastern Somalia. The ship and its crew were released in April, but the World Food Program has been forced to rely on more expensive air deliveries of food aid to Somalia.
Somalia has had 16 years of violence and anarchy, and now is led by a government battling to establish authority even in the capital, and challenged by an Islamic insurgency. Its coasts are virtually unpoliced.
During the six months that an Islamic group known as the Council of Islamic Courts ruled most of southern Somalia, where Somali pirates are based, piracy abated, said Andrew Mwangura, the program coordinator of the Seafarers Assistance Program.
At one point, the group announced it was sending scores of fighters with pickups mounted with machine-guns and anti-aircraft guns to central Somali regions to crack down on pirates based there. Islamic fighters even stormed a hijacked, UAE-registered ship and recaptured it after a gun battle in which pirates — but no crew members — were reportedly wounded.
Mwangura said but piracy increased this year after Ethiopian forces backing Somali government troops ousted the Islamic courts in December.
“So it seems as if some elements within the Somali transitional federal government and some businessmen in Puntland (a northeastern Somalia region) are involved because you know piracy is a lucrative business,” Mwangura told The Associated Press.
Somali government officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
can we draw a connection between the installation of the TFG, their control of the ports (in part to gain control over the money it generates), and the rise in hijackings? hard to say w/ only the limited info i’ve dug up. but there’s no reason to not suspect them. many warlords in the TFG, and the warlords have tried to monopolize trade in the past.
could be un-affiliated warlords though, involved in the rash of hijackings.
businessmen are also suspects, as they may resort to such “lucrative” ventures since the stability that the brief rule of the ICU had brought — recall that they had strong support from private businessmen in driving out the warlords and establishing a modicum of order in which business could thrive — has largely collapsed. the TFG jacked up taxes & tariffs – b/c it’s a corrupt/greedy puppet govt — and soldiers routinely loot businesses, if they’re even able to open, which the main market in mogadishu has barely been able to do over most of the summer. all of this has certainly frustrated many business owners to the point where they may very well be forced to turn to illicit trade & compete in that economy, which could involve hijacking cargo & such. (today i read one article that listed businessmen among the various groups now comprising the insurgency, but i didn’t save it & can’t recall where it was that i saw it.)
and there’s the soldiers – well-known for looting & pillaging in mogadishu. it’s not unlikely that bands of soldiers on their own could take up “lucrative” operations like hijacking cargo. especially when they’re posted right there at the port.
conceivably, it could be a combination of all of those actors involved in varous incidents. hard to say for certain, though the numbers still aren’t that high & possibly inflated (“throw it all in there – related or not”)
what’s interesting about the korean vessel is that the rpts say that it was hijacked after it had already unloaded the cargo bound for mogadishu. did it load anything while in port? was there other cargo still in hold, bound for the next stop? haven’t found that info yet.
also interesting is the chronology of events that ended its hijacking & how the govt propagandists relate it.
the state dept tale (linked in #12) describes it as
On October 30, a U.S. Navy destroyer answered a call for help — relayed through the International Maritime Bureau — from the North Korean crew on a vessel that had been overtaken by pirates in international waters October 29.
The USS James Williams dispatched a helicopter to the sugar-laden Dai Hong Dan, poised 60 nautical miles off the coast of Somalia, to investigate the situation.
The helicopter confirmed the plight of the ship — the pirates had taken control of the ship’s bridge while the crew was confined to the steering and engineering areas — and the destroyer headed to the scene. Upon its arrival, the Navy demanded the pirates surrender.
The arrival of U.S. assistance emboldened the North Koreans to take on the pirates, and a gun battle ensued that left two pirates dead and five captured. Although the North Korean crew regained control of their ship, three members were wounded in the fight.
U.S. Navy medics were invited on board to treat the wounded. The North Korean sailors were transferred to the American destroyer for medical treatment and later returned to their vessel. The five surviving pirates were kept under guard on the North Korean ship, which returned to the Somali port of Mogadishu.
A coalition vessel destroyed the two pirate skiffs so they would not be used again for nefarious purposes.
but that’s not the chronology the press reported
Gunmen killed as Koreans repel attack off Somalia
Nairobi – Two gunmen died and three crew members were badly wounded in gun battles as North Korean seafarers fought off attackers who raided their cargo ship off the coast of Somalia, a maritime official said on Wednesday.
“Six gunmen were also seriously injured in Tuesday’s heavy fighting,” said Andrew Mwangura, head of the Mombasa-based East African Seafarers’ Assistance Programme.
The United States Navy said a destroyer, the USS James Williams, arrived on the scene later and took the wounded on board.
…
The attempted raid on the Dia Hong Dan, which was carrying sugar and 22 sailors, appeared to have been part of a business dispute and not another case of piracy, Mwangura said.
North Korea’s government did not immediately comment.
But South Korean news agency Yonhap reported that South Korean government officials thought the incident might help in the ongoing process to rid the North of nuclear weapons by showing the US was willing to help North Koreans in danger.
and
US navy helps injured North Korean sailors after pirate attack
In one of the world’s most unlikely rescues, a US naval vessel cruised to the support of a North Korean cargo ship this week after it repulsed a boarding by Somali pirates. The mission – which would have been almost unthinkable a year ago – was described by US diplomats as a goodwill gesture that underscored the thaw in ties between two of the cold war’s oldest and, until recently, most bitter enemies.
US sailors were invited aboard the North Korean ship to provide medical assistance to wounded crewmen after a deadly fight with the pirates. The North Korean seamen had already won the battle, killing one Somali, wounding three and overpowering the others.
and there was no destroying of two skiffs attached to the korean vessel. the state dept story is flat-out wrong on that.
it’s debatable whether the use of the evocative term “pirates” is even applicable in most of these incidents. especially in this one involving the korean ship, of which the head of the kenyan-based East African Seafarers’ Assistance Programme judged as “appear[ing] to have been part of a business dispute and not another case of piracy.”
technically speaking, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea has a specific definition of piracy
Article101
Definition of piracy
Piracy consists of any of the following acts:
(a) any illegal acts of violence or detention, or any act of depredation, committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or a private aircraft, and directed:
(i) on the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against persons or property on board such ship or aircraft;
(ii) against a ship, aircraft, persons or property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any State;
(b) any act of voluntary participation in the operation of a ship or of an aircraft with knowledge of facts making it a pirate ship or aircraft;
(c) any act of inciting or of intentionally facilitating an act described in subparagraph (a) or (b).
since since the hijackings this week just off the coast of mogadishu took place in territorial waters, they’re not technically acts of piracy – arguments on somalia’s sovereginty aside.
and if they’re not acts of piracy, then the u.s. is not “battling pirates” in any meaningful sense, though it does have great symbolic weight for propaganda campaigns.
the article that b links to in #17 above states
The U.S. military is once again tangling with pirates, intervening in waters off Somalia twice this week to help ships seized by hijackers — and bringing to mind another century’s battles off Africa.
…
Writing in 1786, Jefferson urged using “ships and men to fight these pirates,” and the U.S. military did just that, battling the Barbary pirates into submission in fighting off the shores of Tripoli.
but that history — the real history — is actually more relevant than the author of that story realizes.
r.t. naylor wrote an informative & fascinating essay last year on this very subject, titled Ghosts of terror wars past? Crime, terror and America’s first clash with the saracen hordes [pdf]. i’ve drawn attention to it twice before, but if you haven’t read it you’ll probably find it worth the effort.
naylor writes how the first u.s. war on terror actually took place in the late 18th/early 19th century in a battle against those swarthy muslim “barbary pirates,” the scourge of all good christians. the pirates label was incorrect at that time, just as it is now, but used to “rally the nation around a common threat, puff the military budget, expand central government authority, suppress internal dissent, and defend the profitability of American business abroad, all with the vocal blessing of the country’s religious leaders, while simultaneously assuming that the costs fell on the poorer sections of the population through fiscal manipulation in the name of patriotism.”
naylor explains: “To the 18th Century American mind, Muslim became synonymous with Pirate much as it would become interchangeable with Terrorist two centuries later.”
but on the jefferson and the barbary “war”
..Jefferson’s most important legacy was probably his role in the creation of a permanent, powerful and modern military for the U.S.
…
“We ought to begin a naval power if we mean to carry on our own commerce,” Jefferson declared. In contemplating the Barbary challenge, he added: “Can we begin it on a more honorable occassion or with a weaker foe?” To Jefferson the Navy was also a means to “arm the Federal head with the safest of all the instruments of coercion over their delinquent members” (i.e., over American states with uppity ideas). Although with considerable prodding from America’s opinion makers, the Barbary states still struck fear into the public heart. Jefferson knew better. “These pyrates,” he stated baldly, “are contemptibly weak.” Their economies had been shrinking for decades, their cities depopulating and their fleets reduced to a handful of poor vessels with mediocre artillery and untrained personnel. Jefferson had always been consistent in his opposition to paying tribute, regarding it as a way to reward and therefore encourage “piracy” (while being perfectly happy to permit American privateers to engage in precisely the same kind of depredation against the ships of European nations with which the U.S. was in conflict).
so jefferson got his navy and war against the “pyrates”, which didn’t turn out to be the cakewalk envisioned earlier.
There followed a derisory, four year campaign in which the U.S. attempted to impose on Tripoli a naval blockade, only to be profoundly embarassed when the Tripolitan side captured the largest warship in the U.S. Navy along with its 300 man crew. In response, U.S. frigates subjected Tripoli to ruthless and indiscriminate bombardment, a dress rehearsal for what would be visited upon Baghdad and other Iraqi cities two hundred years later. The damage would have been worse if an American plan to sail a ship loaded with explosives deep into the harbor before blowing it up had not been thwarted by Libyan shore defenses. The American crew who died were, of course, lauded as military heros rather than derided as failed suicide bombers.
Nor was this the end of the striking victories. After he was expelled from Tripoli, William Eaton fell back on Cairo where he plotted to replace the Dayi with a pliable, exiled older brother. To put the plan into effect, Eaton led a mixed detachment of mercenaries and Marines across the desert to capture the weakly defended town of Dernah. It had no impact on the course of the military campaign; the conquering force was soon beseigned in turn; and the Dayi, who had never wanted war, soon secured from the U.S. government the peace he had been seeking. The new treaty reduced (but did not eliminate) the subsidies; but it gave the Dayi his recognition as a sovereign power.
However, America’s first foreign contest had an enormous propaganda effect back home, even inspiring the stirring lines in the Marine corps hymn: “…to the shores of Tripoli.” Under the circumstances, it would have been mean-spirited to point out that U.S. forces were largely foreign mercenaries who came in by land and that Dernah was about 800 miles east of Tripoli. While the American population was exhulting in its first great victory over Islamic Terror, Mediterranean states were taking note of what seemed from their perspective an impressive Libyan military performance. For them there was no “shock and awe” from America’s first overseas campaign, while its first “regime change” plot had been an utter failure. The American setback in Tripoli probably ensured that the U.S. would not become a colonial power in North Africa — that honor would go primarily to France, with Spain, Britain and Italy vying for their share. Arguably, America’s subsequent decision to focus its lunge for empire westward, across the Continent, then over the Pacific, grew at least in part out of less-than-inspired results in the Mediterranean; but there is little point in trying to explain that to the Pentagon today.
Posted by: b real | Nov 3 2007 6:29 utc | 23
Bushite Worship and the American Halliban
Was listening to some radio show, waiting for the bus,
the moderator had a Human Rights Watch whiner, and some
State Department hack named Casey, talking about “torture”,
now that Rumsfeld has been indicted on war crimes in France.
Well it turns out Casey isn’t even of the Secretary of State’s
office, he’s a “spokesman”, like Ari Fleischer. A propaganda
psy-ops tool. Deputy Spokesman Tom Casey gave the classic non
sequitor, “Torture is the only (sic) way we can avoid another 9/11”.
The HRW woman whined about human pain and suffering, which just
played into the hands of Casey, who flipped it to the pain and
suffering caused in 9/11, yada, yada.
Then the moderator gave Casey open platform to talk about
why the US needed “extraordinary measures” (torture and
rendition) in these times of “all out global terrorism”.
Almost like the show was a paid State Department faux debate.
Then they took listener calls, with more whining, or else the
other kind, returning vet’s, “have to kill all the snakes” crap.
Then unexpectedly there was a caller on a monitored line, named
Robinson. He said he was a retired Colonel and DoD analyst who
wrote the manual on US mil interrogation techniques ! Good stuff!
Robinson totally trashed Casey’s ten minute hector monologue on
how “it all depends on how you define torture”, saying that no
responsible military personnel would use torture, it was all
the mercenaries and wildcat CIA operatives assigned by the VP
to supervise the Abu Ghraib and Gitmo service people, which
caused all the problems, the multiple torture deaths, machine
gunning of interred suspects, raping suspects’ sons in front
of their fathers to extract confessions, really sick stuff
Congress knows about, saw videos of, then made SECRET.
Remember, the Iraqi suspects were ANY MEN IN THE VILLAGE
rounded up in “sweeps”, then interred for “processing”. And
mil start raping their sons in front of them to gather evidence?
Then State says, well, sometimes you gotta break a few eggs?!
So Robinson went a step higher, and said the whole thing
came down out of Cheney’s office through David Addington.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Addington
“The most powerful man you never heard of.”
The very MOMENT the military expert said Addington’s name,
his phone was cut off and you could hear the dial tone!
The moderator suddenly said, oh, we have to go to commercial.
Cheney. That’s where it all leads back to. Barking Mad Dick.
Father was a power company lineman. Never home with his kid.
Grew up in Montana. Went to State, then got SEVEN deferments.
Does not like war, at least not when he has to actively serve.
Receiving deferred salary and bonuses from Halliburton, linked to
the price of crude oil. Has accumulated ~$500M, as a bureaucrat.
while VP salary is $175,000 a year (<$2.5M over 30-year career).
Do the math. Endless torture and war pays Dick belli belli good.
Which goes towards the Zeitgeist movie, when our kids look back on
the 2000's, unchallenged war corruption, then piss on our graves,
while Cheney laughs from his penthouse suite overlooking Dubai.
http://zeitgeistmovie.com/
$196B is the Neo-Zi’s surge demand.
That’s a big 42″ LCD TV out of every working American’s pocket!!
That’s a brand new laptop out of every working American’s pocket!!
Bush was on TV next day, slashing away at Congress for delaying
the vote on his highest ever drawdown on our national deficit.
SO WHAT IS $196,000,000,000 FOR, GEORGE?!~ WHERE IS OUR AUDIT?!
It’s the collateral direct and indirects costs Bush is obfuscating:
http://www.ips-dc.org/iraq/failedtransition/
How is it that no one challenges him, no one makes him address realities?!
Posted by: Apres Deluge | Nov 3 2007 17:57 utc | 31
Will I be living my whole freaking life in this slow crash of the overshoot of the thinhaired ape species? And how do you live such a life?
o askod, you speak directly to my heart at this moment, you give me permission to wail — just for a moment…
I have so little hope even for the immediate future, let alone anything called Posterity. it is hard to make even the pragmatic plans, achieve even the pragmatic immediate goals, required by my job and my relocation. there is a constant sense of “what’s the point?” … it seems that there is not much point in moving to any place rather than any other place, since the same cannibals are in charge everywhere, picking their teeth with the splintered bones of the earth.
one feels (I feel anyway) more and more like some bewildered animal whose habitat has been transected and surrounded by wildcat developers, wandering around hopelessly trying to find any migration corridor, any stand of sheltering trees, any source of clean water, any place to hide from the bulldozers and the bombers and the terrifying, robotic/sadistic wetiko-cultists bent on hurting, crippling, breaking and enslaving all that lives. or like a whale maddened by searing, torturing walls of sonic violence (new “improved” navy sonar), bleeding at the ears, swimming desperately in any direction, blind and disoriented, unable to understand what new monster has invaded the oceans. or like poisoned bees, suddenly unable to find their way home. where can one find a life halfway recognisable as good, decent, worth living, paid for neither by being crushed into slavery nor by crushing others?
are we really — as a species — too clever for our own good? all our ingenuity, all our vaunted intelligence and creativity, is it only good for gobbling up more resources than the next ape and killing anyone who competes or interferes? are we really as dumb as yeast, we who are clever enough to invent clockwork orreries and the backstrap loom, the bicycle and even temperament and microscales, polyrhythms and N:1 tackles, waterwheels and paper and writing, the musical saw and knitting and yes, the steam engine and the transistor?
is it really the case that with all this cleverness, all this ingenuity, we can paint ourselves into such a dismal corner that the only choice left to us is to find some people worth dying with, and stick with them until whatever unpleasant end comes first to find us?
seldom have I felt such despair. but I guess misery really does love company, because my sense of despair is oddly lessened by knowing that someone else is feeling something similar, if not identical. what is most distressing and crazy-making is the absolute blithering-idiotic normality of the great roaring lemming-dom all around. the air is full of planes, the roads are choked with cars, the undergrads on the bus are yammering like a cage full of parakeets about their designer clothes and their new iPods and where they went for vacation and what kind of car Mommy and Daddy are buying them and how drunk they got last weekend. the mailbox is full of glossy dead-tree catalogues inviting me to Buy Buy Buy — even as we run out of trees and choke on mountains of utterly useless consumer gewgaws. truly, the front end of the train is already off the trestles and in freefall, but in the rear cars the champagne corks are popping and the band is playing loud and cheerful dance music.
for those of us stuck in the last cars, but sober and looking out the window, the situation is brain-hurting, intolerable. to see it coming and be so helpless to do anything substantive to alter the outcome, that’s what makes a person feel crazy.
Posted by: DeAnander | Nov 4 2007 5:44 utc | 46
Depression and bewilderment are slowly giving way to hatred and rage for me as certain facts become irrefutable from my vantage point in one of the back carriages of the slo-mo wreck.
The U.S. dollar is in dire straits.
The U.S. dollar fell again on Friday against a basket of six major currencies… hitting levels not seen in that index’s 30-year plus history. It has fallen more than 7.0 percent since the summer’s financial ruckus started.
Since my debt is in U.S. dollars and my income is not, I should be very pleased about this. I’m not because, as Bernhard so kindly pointed out, the more desperate the U.S. economy becomes, the more likely will be the Flucht nach vorne into war with Iran.
Why should this be? Look at the records here. I am hesitant to lay the entirety of this perverse psychology at the feet of a single man, however George Bush has become the personification of the worst aspects of Western culture. He is the living embodiment of a mass psychosis. He was quick to point out how the Kyoto protocol would have “wrecked (the U.S.) economy”, but never once mentioned how global climate change would wreck the lives and very geography of 6.6 billions inhabitants of the planet. Lives and land can also be (somewhat cynically) translated into financial assets, but George W. Bush has become the standard bearer for those who DO NOT WANT humanitarian assets.
They are not interested in life. Citing costs, Bush has vetoed a US$23 billion water bill on Friday.
Snip…
The bill would authorize more than 900 projects, such as restoration in the Florida Everglades and the replacement of seven Depression-era locks on the Upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers that farm groups say is crucial for shipping grain.
For California, the bill authorizes $1.3 billion for 54 projects, including $106 million to strengthen the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta levees, $25 million for revitalizing the concrete-bound Los Angeles River and $38 million for replenishing sand at Imperial Beach in San Diego County, a project that supporters say would protect coastal residents from storms.
It is the fifth bill that Bush has vetoed — the fewest by any president since James A. Garfield, who was shot in 1881 after four months in office and died weeks later. Bush has vetoed two bills that would have expanded federal support for embryonic stem cell research, a bill to pay for the Iraq war that included a timeline for withdrawing troops, and a bill that would have expanded a children’s health insurance program. The four vetoes were sustained.
Do you see a pattern here? While the West Coast of the USA goes up in flames, while the Gulf Coast drowns, while the Atlantic Southern states are facing the worst drought in a century, US$23 billion for relief is too much to ask. Nearly US$2billion a week to hurt people or to make a childish point, however, is not too much to ask.
There is no cap on how much should be spent on planes, tanks, guns, bullets, warrantless surveillance, or any of the CIA, NSA or DARPA’s new and inventive ways to kill, maim and hurt people. Fixing problems for people is too expensive. Causing suffering is worth any cost.
Seriously, I have asked before what the purpose of a government is if it is not to promote the general welfare of the governed. The lackadaisical response to the California wildfires this summer, the almost contemptuous disinterest in the response to Hurricane Katrina or the Georgia drought, the callously dismissed children’s health care initiatives… at which point do you finally realize that these people WANT YOU TO SUFFER? They do not want things to get better for anyone. They want them worse. When are the scales finally going to fall from the eyes of people who promote this candidate or that party and they see, in no uncertain terms, that these people INVEST IN DEATH. They have nothing but CONTEMPT FOR LIFE. They are the antithesis of your saviours and guardians. The U.S. economy is tanking, despite Bush’s refusal to sign on to the Kyoto deal, and THAT IS FINE WITH THEM. They want to bring the whole world down in flames and they are doing a damned good job of it, even if it seems to be moving in slow motion.
Posted by: Monolycus | Nov 4 2007 8:29 utc | 48
well, I see my angst is not entirely personal.
@Monolycus, I think the cult of death is an inevitable outcome of the cult of profit and accumulation. the proof of the axiom would be long and involved, but Hornborg (or Georgescu-Roegen) may be the key texts. accumulation is essentially predation as opposed to symbiosis. symbiotes live alongside their partners, each emitting factors nutritious or protective to the other. predators wait until their prey has done the work of converting sunlight and cellulose to protein and fat, and then swoop down and loot the accumulated effort in one tasty meal.
predators exist on the surplus, trimming down the tendency for prey to overbreed and exceed their food supply; predators tend to be not nearly so prolific as prey. now, if a species managed to accelerate its breeding rate to a prey paradigm, multiplying as we say like rabbits, yet at the same time adopted predation as its dominant strategy and cultural metaphor, you’d have the problem of humanity: we are far too numerous to be predators, yet we want to eat and live like predators, on ambush, theft, and looting.
and this predation metaphor (at the heart of the vulgar Darwininism so beloved of neocons and outright Randians) applies not only to our relationship with other biota and indeed the earth’s crust, but to our relationship with each other. the biggest thief and looter rises to the top and is admired for it, everyone loves a winner, only sissies care about other people, nice guys finish last, and so on.
the predation/competition metaphor is so strongly ingrained in Anglo ideology that when Schwendener and others first documented symbiotic organisms (notoriously lichen), the English scientific establishment (the London Consensus you might say, since England was then the “indispensable nation” and imperial hegemon) had a hissy fit denying and suppressing his research, ridiculing anyone who dared to discuss or republish it. “Schwendenerist” actually became briefly a term of public ridicule for — guess what — an unmanly flipflopper, a fellow who can’t make up his mind which explanation of a phenomenon is correct, who can’t “take a firm stand.”
the model of admirable predation is the only one that can romanticise and ennoble the practise of profit-taking. or perhaps the practise of profit-taking grows out of the combination of a predatory mindset and the invention of money and compound interest. but at any rate, the attitude of Homo sap. to the planet and to each other is increasingly one of N bio people all dreaming of being top predators. there is only one end game for such a mindset: they will eat the planet bare, and then they will eat each other.
in fact we see something like this taking place throughout the history of capitalism: one resource after another being Enclosed, until finally in our day the Enclosers are trying to put their fences up around genetic information, music, literature, words, ideas, images. fortunately (for them) the resource crunch is now producing genuine scarcity in the realms where they have used barbed wire and guns to produce artificial scarcity, i.e. land, water, food. the opportunities for predatory profit-taking grow ever greater as the resource crunch approaches, much as the cheetah can more easily drag down a hungry and tired wildebeest and the wildebeest will take greater and greater risks to get near food and water when there’s a drought on… however as the prey get sicklier and thinner the return on each kill gets smaller, and the predator has to kill more and more frequently and freely to get the same caloric intake (notice how the neocon assaults on “fat” economies are getting more frequent and more brutal and closer to home?)
anyway, this is not a fully fleshed out thesis but our blind and bitter adherence to a predation model of “human nature” and our insistence on modelling our entire understanding of evolution and the biotic realm on predation/competition rather than symbiosis, seem to be deeply linked to (a) notions of gender and masculinist posturing and (b) practises of profit-taking, conquest, resource extraction in other words empire. to model all of nature as “red in tooth and claw” and full of vicious profiteers all looting each other, naturalises (excuses, in post-Enlightenment eyes) that behaviour in humans.
one more example: I was taught in school, as probably were most people, that trees in a forest “compete” for sunlight, struggling upwards, trying to crowd each other out, a slo-mo wrestling match which the fittest trees survive. nothing could be more wrong. it turns out that beneath the soil all the trees tap into one common mycelial web and it is now documented that in copses and thickets and between clearings, the trees on the outside deliver more nutrients into the mycelial web than those inside, and those nutrients are shared and balanced to support the trees inside who get less sunlight. I will have to read the passage again for more detail, but presumably the trees inside in the shade have richer composted soil and more water, and those resources get shared via the mycelium with the trees outside. and this sharing takes place across species of trees, so that deciduous trees help conifers and vice versa, shrubs help trees, vines help shrubs.
trees, in other words, are socialists. no wonder capitalist lumber companies want to chop them all down or confine them in re-education camps (monocrop plantations) where they are not allowed to communicate and share.
our misunderstanding of the majority of biotic activity on earth may not be entirely perversity on our part. much of what “really” goes on is at the micro level, bacterial and fungal, and is non-obvious to the naked eye. whereas acts of predation are visible, brutal and simple to observe. but it’s a misunderstanding that seems to colour all of our behaviour, or at least the behaviour of elites and “advanced” imperial nations, those with the wetiko virus.
if there is really any “law of nature” it is that unchecked predation is suicide, just as unlimited breeding is suicide. we humans are practising both — double your money double your fun.
it is time for a crash course in symbiology and bio-mimicry. but is it too late already?
btw, I found a delightful intro to symbiology in Tom Wakeford’s little book Liaisons of Life — a good read and packed with thought provoking info. currently attempting the more technical but still well-written Power, Sex, Suicide which is about the role of mitochondria in evolution.
Posted by: DeAnander | Nov 4 2007 18:34 utc | 54
Checking in on how the preparations for the Israeli-Palestinian “peace” conference are proceeding, we learn:
Not much is clear about it at all:
One month before President George W. Bush’s Mideast peace conference – the administration’s first serious effort in six years – it’s still not clear what will be on the agenda or who, beyond the Americans, Israelis and Palestinians, will show up. Even the date is still up in the air.
Rice, in Jerusalem today, is seriously trying to lower expectations:
By Rice’s own assessment, there is little hope of progress toward an agreement this weekend.
“I absolutely don’t expect there will be agreement on a document,” Rice told reporters on Saturday.
Debka: Bush Pulls the Rug Out from under Condi on Annapolis, emasculating the already fairly hopeless conference Even taken with a grain of salt, as one must always do with Debka, this is worth further investigation — has anyone else heard about this?
Israel and the US Decide Syria “Will Be Allowed to Attend but…”
The two agreed that Israel and the United States would allow Syrian officials to attend if Syria accepted the fact that the summit would deal only with Israeli-Palestinian relations, and not with the fate of the Golan Heights.
The statements were made in response to the Syrian foreign minister’s request to Rice on Saturday that the summit deal with Israel-Syria issues as well.
This is a way to extend an invitation while ensuring that the invited party will decline. And note that “Israel and the US” make the decisions about the invitees; the Palestinians are merely dragged along in their wake with no say.
Some Folks May Have Actually Had a Different Agenda for Annapolis All Along
[Israeli] Minister Ami Ayalon met with Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat Thursday night and told him that “the Annapolis conference needs to serve as an additional link in the chain of the creation of a regional coalition against the Iranian threat.”
or this:
[Israeli] Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Strategic Affairs Avigdor Lieberman on Saturday set down his ‘red lines’ for any agreement made with the Palestinians at the upcoming Annapolis peace conference.
Lieberman told Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that the agreement must include a swap of populations and land in a way that will ensure an 80% Jewish majority in Israel. He also said Israel must demand a complete stop to any acts of terror and a solution to the Palestinian economic crisis before the finalization of any agreement.
Key Israeli figures criticize Defense Minister Barak as being too right-wing; Barak gets in a shouting match with Israel’s Attorney General over cutting electricity to Gaza
Paranoia Runs High
Meanwhile, it’s business as usual for Israel in Gaza:
Gaza – Ma’an – Israeli warplanes killed four Palestinians in the Gaza Strip Sunday morning, including three factory workers. An intense bombardment left dozens of others wounded, many of them within a half hour of bombardment.
Israeli forces shelled the town of Beit Hanoun, at the northern end of the Gaza Strip, killing a twenty-five-year-old Islamic Jihad Al-Quds Brigades fighter named Hisham Khaddoura. A twenty-three-year-old Al-Quds Brigades activist named Muhammad Abid was injured.
Other wounded Palestinians could not be evacuated because Israeli bombardment made areas in and around Beit Hanoun inaccessible to medical crews.
Medical officials said the bodies of the three factory workers were “cut into pieces” when they arrived at Al-Udwan and Al-Awda hospitals in northern Gaza. The bodies were identified as forty-year-old Zaher Al-Ar, his eighteen-year-old son Yousef Al-Ar, and twenty-three-year-old Muhammad Abu Hrbeid.
PS. A clever Israeli has invented a new game: Middle East Bullshit Bingo
Posted by: Bea | Nov 4 2007 19:02 utc | 55
there has been a lot of heavy fighting in mogadishu for the past week and, despite a very brief ceasing of ethiopian operations in some neighborhoods negotiated by hawiye elders (thru mayor dheere?), attacks on all sides show no signs of letting up anytime soon. last week u.n. agencies cited 88,000 people fleeing from essentially four neighborhoods in mogadishu as ethiopian forces continued rounds of house-to-house operations.
today, there are reports that even more people are now fleeing as additional ethiopian reinforcements have been moving into the capital.
IRIN: Thousands more leave capital as troops converge
NAIROBI, 5 November 2007 (IRIN) – Fears of a major military offensive have sparked a further civilian exodus from the Somali capital Mogadishu, local sources told IRIN on 5 November.
“Thousands of people are leaving the city as we speak,” said Mohamed Hassan Haad, the chairman of the Hawiye [the predominant clan] elders’ council. “They are worried that the arrival of thousands of Ethiopian troops will lead to a major attack on the city.”
Haad appealed to the international community to intervene before new atrocities could be committed. “Now is the time to speak up, not after the deed is done,” he said.
A local journalist, who requested anonymity, said: “They [Ethiopian troops] have been coming in large convoys since 28 October. I think it is in reaction to the escalation of the insurgent activity in the city.”
a couple rpts over the w/e on the convoys (which have also been the targets of attacks)
garowe online: Ethiopia deploys reinforcements to Mogadishu as fighting intensifies
MOGADISHU, Somalia Nov 3 (Garowe Online) – Heavy fighting continued in parts of the Somali capital Mogadishu Saturday afternoon as more Ethiopian troops and military hardware poured into the city.
…
..a 45-truck armored convoy of Ethiopian soldiers arrived in Afgoye, 30km south of Mogadishu. Some of the troops entered Mogadishu to reinforce operations there, officials said.
The troops came from Bay and Gedo regions, both in southwestern Somalia. A landmine explosion stopped the trucks for about an hour in Wanla Weyn district of Lower Shabelle region.
…
Mogadishu residents said this is the largest deployment of Ethiopian forces since April, when Mogadishu saw some of the heaviest battles this year.
reuters: Ethiopia reinforces troops in Somalia – witnesses
MOGADISHU, Nov 4 (Reuters) – More Ethiopian troops are pouring into Somalia to join local government soldiers in a battle against Islamist insurgents that has sent tens of thousands of people fleeing Mogadishu, witnesses said on Sunday.
“Convoys of Ethiopian troops have been passing. I counted 30 army vehicles,” shopkeeper Farah Abdikarim said from Afgoye, describing columns he saw on Saturday driving east from the town on a 40 km (25 mile) road to the Somali capital.
Addis Ababa officially recognises having about 4,000 soldiers in Somalia, where it is supporting President Abdullahi Yusuf’s government against Islamist rebels. But Somalis and regional diplomats say there are far more than that.
Reinforcements generally drive in from east Ethiopia, past Baidoa — seat of the Somali parliament and headquarters for the government while the Islamists ruled Mogadishu for six months in 2006 — then on to the coastal capital.
…
“On Friday, we saw 60 army lorries overloaded with well-armed Ethiopian troops. New troops have been going into Mogadishu for the last four days,” Farah added.
Mogadishu residents confirmed the movements.
“I have seen 20 Ethiopian vehicles as they came in behind Mogadishu University,” student Osman Suleiman. “They were heading to Maslah (a base in north
back to the IRIN rpt
According to the journalist, Mogadishu was waiting for “the start of a new offensive” by the Ethiopian and government forces.
“There is no doubt that they are bringing this new force for a major operation,” he said. “It is just a matter of time.”
…
The local journalist said that skirmishes had continued since the latest wave of fighting began on 27 October. These included attacks on two Ethiopian military bases and a number of government police posts on 4 November, he said. [mortar attacks on the bases continued on monday]
A medical source told IRIN that more than 100 people had been killed in the recent violence and another 200 taken to hospital with serious injuries.
“These are the ones who made it into Madina, [south] Keysaney [north] and Dayniile [northwest] hospitals in the city,” he said. “Many people died in their homes and were buried, while others were taken care of by relatives or in private clinics.”
Haad said the elders’ committee had been gathering information on those killed in the city since August. “We now have the names of 1085 people killed in Heliwa district [an insurgents’ stronghold in north Mogadishu] alone,” he said. “A list for the whole city should be available by the end of this week.”
According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) – Somalia, about 450,000 people have been displaced by fighting this year, bringing the total number of displaced persons in Somalia to more than 850,000 including about 400,000 displaced since the civil war began in the 1990s.
ethiopia must have a lot of troops. while the govt is very tight w/ the real number of soldiers in somalia (not to mention the numbers killed in that occupation, which has to be signficant), it is also taking a hit on its forces deployed in the ogaden region inside its own borders (on friday the ONLF announced that it had killed another sizeable number — over 270 — of ethiopian troops, coming on top of the hundreds alleged killed just a few weeks ago), and is reported to have 100,000 troops along the border w/ eritrea in what continues to build into very real fears of renewed fighting there. an article from the beginning of this year put the ethiopian military at “roughly 200,000 personnel,” which has to be out-of-date by this point.
Posted by: b real | Nov 5 2007 20:03 utc | 70
working link for #79
Skepticism, distrust greet America’s new military command in Africa
there was a barely altered version of that same story that ran on the navytime’s site today, w/ a more empowering headline
Navy exercise kicks off AfriCom mission
good to see you still around, BenIAM
two things from that AP wire story today stood out to me
1. of all the astute things wafula okumu has said about the problems AFRICOM faces on the continent, the reporter singled out the sentence
“If it was packaged a different way and better explained, maybe it could be a success.”
define success. for whom? for the investors in AFRICOM? or for the african peoples? it definitely won’t be a success for the latter, no matter how much lipstick you smear on this pig.
robert kaplan has the same kind of nonsense reverberating between his ears, hoping to see his racist “indian country” war game ideas transposed onto africa while at the same time offering a chance to clean up the u.s. image
Indeed, through a combination of small-scale military strikes that do not generate bad publicity and constant involvement on the soft, humanitarian side of military operations, AFRICOM could rebuild the post-Iraq image of the American soldier in the global commons.
these ideas that image can trump reality — how long do they imagine they can prevail? whoever heard of small-scale military strikes on foreign lands leading to good press? who’s fooling who? i’d argue that these attempts at packaging are not fooling those on a continent w/ a historical memory of colonialism.
as julius nyerere nicely put it in his 1963 book, the second scramble,
..if we, in Africa, were left on our own we would achieve Unity on our Continent, but … I do not believe we are going to be left alone.
…
But there is no need for fear. All we need to do is use our intellect; to know what is good for us. We need to listen to the outside world; to accept from them what we believe is in the best interests of Africa and of African Unity, and to reject (and reject in no uncertain terms) what believe is not in the best interests of Africa and African Unity. And that includes all those attractive, but misleading, slogans about “democracy,” “socialism,” and so on, which are too often used to cloak the real designs of the power-hungry.
…
What annoys me is not the use of these labels and slogans by power-hungry nations; that, after all, is something we expect. But what does infuriate me is their expecting us to allow ourselves to be treated as if we were a bunch of idiots!
so let the imperialist braintrust behind AFRICOM focus on image & broadcasting pretty slogans about a neo-military enforcement of “democracy” and humanitarianism for the african masses; the end will reveal them for what they remain — supremacist, warrior asses.
and
2. one reason that the AFRICOM spokespeople like stressing that they aren’t (currently) envisioning rings of bases on the continent at the moment is b/c they expect to use more subtle means of conquest — particularly in the form of gaining control of select militaries (“professionalism,” “peacekeeping,” GWOT, etc), the civic sector (“good governance,” “democracy promotion,” and “accountability”), and the business sector (privatization, infrastructure development/ownership). and throw in ideas of controlling humanitarian efforts (NGO’s, logistics, USAID, etc).
this is the experiment that they hope to undertake in africa – avoid the outright colonialism that comes w/ permanent basing while still achieving hegemony to protect u.s. interests & investments in…well…as ‘principal deputy under secretary of defense for policy’ (whew!) ryan henry proclaimed, “a country both rich in human capital and — a continent rich in human capital and natural resources.”
Posted by: b real | Nov 6 2007 4:33 utc | 81
|