Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 27, 2007
Earthquake Cluster

Hmm – what is up with these?

Earthquake shakes Manila, 11/27/2007

Workers evacuated office buildings in Manila Tuesday afternoon after a magnitude 4.2 earthquake rattled an undersea area off Pangasinan.

Indonesia rocked by major earthquake, three people killed, 11/27/07

A 6.7-magnitude earthquake struck off Indonesia’s Sumbawa island yesterday, killing three, injuring 55 and damaging hundreds of homes as repeated aftershocks rattled nerves, officials said.

Earthquake rocks Delhi, adjoining areas, 11/27/07

An official with the Indian Meteorological Department, which monitors earthquakes, said the 4.3-magnitude quake struck at about 4:43 a.m. Besides the capital, the tremor was felt in surrounding areas such as Noida (UP), Faridabad and Gurgaon (both in Haryana).

Mexican capital rattled by earthquake, 11/27/07

A 5.8 magnitude earthquake shook the Mexican capital Monday, but appears not to have caused damage or injuries, said Civil Protection Secretary Mariano Brizuela.

Strong earthquake rocks eastern Indonesia, 11/26/07

An aftershock measuring 5.7 on the Richter scale Monday jolted Indonesia’s eastern province of West Nusa Tenggara, where two powerful quakes killed three people and injured 45 others within the last 24 hours.

6.2 Earthquake Rocks Japan, 11/26/07

The Japanese city of Iwaki was hit by a 6.2 magnitude earthquake on Monday, the U.S. Geological Survey said.

Olympic Peninsula jolted by 4.0 quake Monday, 11/27/07

The light quake, which occurred at 10:18 p.m., was centered about six miles north of Brinnon with a depth of 34 miles, according to the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network.

Small earthquake rattles valley Sunday, epicenter near site of 1992 Landers shaker, 11/26/07

The 12:31 p.m. temblor was measured at magnitude 3.1 by automated seismographs, which placed its epicenter 30 miles north of Palm springs about 8 miles east-southeast of Big Bear City.

Magnitude 5.0 Earthquake Shakes Guanacaste, 11/26/07

Several communities in the northwestern Guanacaste province were rocked by an earthquake measuring 5.0 on the Richter scale Saturday, according to the Volcanological and Seismological Observatory of Costa Rica (OVSICORI) based at National University in Heredia, north of San José.

At 1:06 a.m. Friday, a magnitude 4.0 earthquake rattled the southern Pacific coast of Costa Rica about 15 kilometers northwest of Puerto Armuelles, Panama.

Third earthquake in a week shakes Israel, 11/25/07

The latest tremor occurred early Saturday morning, and had a magnitude of 4.2, the Geophysical Institute of Israel said. On Tuesday, there were two earthquakes, with magnitudes of 3.0 and 4.2.

Earthquake hits Pakistan, 11/26/07

A moderate earthquake measuring 5.2 magnitude on the Richter scale struck Pakistan on Sunday evening, the Meteorological Department said in New Delhi.

The quake, which occurred at 7.24pm, had its epicentre at 29.4 degree North latitude and 69.4 degree East longitude, the Met department said.

Small quake rattles Grass Range area; magnitude 3.5 to 4.1, 11/27/07

The quake struck at 11:27 p.m. Sunday and registered a magnitude 4.1, according to Mike Stickney with the Earthquake Studies Office at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology.

Earthquake hits eastern Papua New Guinea, 11/22/07

An earthquake with a preliminary magnitude 6.7 rocked eastern Papua New Guinea last night, causing some damage and plunging parts of the coastal city of Lae into darkness, officials and witnesses said.

Earthquake of 5.1 magnitude shakes southern Iran, 11/22/07

Southern Iran was hit by a 5.1 magnitude earthquake early on Thursday, a day after a quake struck the oil-rich southwest of the country, injuring 30, an official Iranian news agency said.

Chile hit by 5.9 magnitude earthquake, 11/21/07

A 5.9 magnitude earthquake rattled the region of northern Chile that has been rocked by a series of aftershocks over the last week, the US Geological Survey said today.

The quake at 12:55pm was centered 230 km southeast of Antofagasta, and was 110 km deep, the USGS said.

A week ago, a 7.7 magnitude quake near Antofagasta collapsed homes and buildings, killing two people and injuring 115, and there have been a number of aftershocks since then.

Earthquake strikes off coast of Oregon, no damage reported , 11/19/07

A 5.8 magnitude earthquake struck off the northwestern coast of the United States on Monday but there were no immediate reports of injuries or damage, officials said.

Earthquake rattles Ecuador, 11/16/07

A 6.7-magnitude earthquake struck southern Ecuador, shattering building windows in the city of Guayaquil while leaving no immediate victims, Ecuadoran and US officials said.

The earthquake shook the Andean nation one day after a powerful 7.7-magnitude temblor struck northern Chile, killing two people.

Earthquake rattles Santa Barbara; no immediate reports of injuries or damage, 11/16/07

A magnitude-3.4 earthquake has shaken part of California’s central coast, but there were no immediate reports of injuries or damage.

South Iran hit by another earthquake, 11/21/07

The province of Hormozgan, southern Iran, was hit by an earthquake on Thursday morning, the IRNA news agency reported.

The quake measuring 5.1 on the Richter scale occurred at 7:15 a.m. local time (3:45 a.m. GMT). There are no reports of casualties or damage.

This is the second earthquake to hit the Islamic Republic this week. On Tuesday, the oil-rich province of Khuzestan, in southwest Iran, experienced a 5.1 magnitude quake, which caused slight damage to buildings and some 30 students suffered minor injuries.

Strong earthquake shakes northern Chile, kills at least two, 11/14/07

A strong earthquake measuring 7.7 rocked arid northern Chile Wednesday, killing at least two people, injuring others, sparking panic and causing power outages.

6.7 quake shakes Peru-Ecuador border, 11/15/2007

A powerful earthquake shook the border region of Ecuador and Peru late Thursday, but there were no immediate reports of injuries or major damage.
The U.S. Geological Survey said the magnitude 6.7 quake struck at 10:12 p.m. and was centered in a sparsely populated jungle region, about 150 miles southeast of Quito, the capital. Local media said the temblor was felt strongly in the country’s largest city, the port of Guayaquil.

Is something bigger brewing here or is this just normal?

Comments

I’m no geologist, but it seems that across the world there are quite a few quakes a day on average, with particular concentrations around the edge of the pacific plate (Chile, Indonesia, etc..)
A globe with the earthquakes in red–show’s the various plates clearly:
http://projects.crustal.ucsb.edu/understanding/globe/globe.html
Recent earthquake data on a map (though the writer has a lot of caveats):
http://tsunami.geo.ed.ac.uk/local-bin/quakes/mapscript/show_map.pl
Any info. from more informed types appreciated.

Posted by: Argh | Nov 27 2007 9:38 utc | 1

HAARP?

Imagine we had an unlimited amount of dominoes and we lined them up from here to, let’s say, Paris. Then we could tip the first domino with 10 grams; it will fall down and cause the second domino to tumble, too, etc. The first action of 10 grams will cause all the dominoes to tumble including the last domino in Paris.
From this experiment we should understand that it is not the 10 gram action that causes all the dominoes to tumble, but the 10 gram action just creates an imbalance of the first domino. It is the gravity, however, that causes the dominoes to fall. In other words: only a 10 gram action is required to trigger a gravitational activity of all our dominoes from here to Paris.

Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology.

Posted by: Ghost of Saddam Hussein | Nov 27 2007 12:14 utc | 2

Youtube: Informative video on HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Reasearch Program)
the new weather modification and mind control Star Wars Defense Initiative (SDI)weapon of the US military. HAARP is capable of creating weather like hurricanes and tornadoes and tsunamis and earthquakes. It is also capable of altering peoples moods. From WETA TV a PBS station. Run a Google.com search for HAARP.

Posted by: Ghost of Saddam Hussein | Nov 27 2007 12:20 utc | 3

I was curious.
How Many Earthquakes Happen Each Year?
There are over a million quakes annually, including those too small to be felt. The following table shows the average frequency of different magnitudes.
Description Magnitude Frequency per year
Great 8.0+ 1
Major 7.0-7.9 18
Large (destructive) 6.0-6.9 120
Moderate (damaging) 5.0-5.9 1,000
Minor (damage slight) 4.0-4.0 6,000
Generally felt 3.0-3.9 49,000
Potentially perceptible 2.0-2.9 300,000
Imperceptible less than 2.0 600,000+
From Earthquakes and the Urban Environment, Vol. 1, G. Lennis Berlin, 1980
How Many Earthquakes Happen Every Month? Day? Minute?
Using the previous table:
Per month……………………………………Approximately 80,000
Per day…………………………………..Approximately 2,600
Per minute…………………………….Approximately 2
And, per second, one earthquake is felt approximately every 30 seconds.
Of these only a relative few are capable of causing damage. Earthquakes are common natural events.

Posted by: Juannie | Nov 27 2007 14:27 utc | 4

Thanks Juannie – sounds reasonable – still I am wondering because I had never seen so many in the news in such a short timeframe.

Posted by: b | Nov 27 2007 14:31 utc | 5

Good visual survey:
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/

Posted by: biklett | Nov 27 2007 14:50 utc | 6

One more just in: 6.6 magnitude quake hits near Solomon Islands: USGS

A 6.6 magnitude earthquake struck near the Solomon Islands on Tuesday, the U.S. Geological Survey reported.
The quake, which hit at 6:50 a.m. EST, was centered 43 miles (69 km) southeast of Kira Kira, Solomon Islands, at a depth of 25.8 miles, the USGS said.

Posted by: b | Nov 27 2007 15:02 utc | 7

McClatchy blog on the reaction to a recent earthquake in Israel: The wrath of God

But is God telling His People (and, which People is He talking to anyway?) to stand firm or make peace?
“I hope it jolts the settlers out of illegal settlements in the West Bank,” wrote one Haaretz reader in response to the paper’s article on the latest earthquake. “We need to return the land for peace.”
Another reader saw the opposite message.
“God, giving Israel fair warning before Annapolis,” wrote Mikhail. “Don’t give away the Land gave to you… It’s yours to keep (like it or not)”
Over at The Jerusalem Post, readers were even more zealous.
“Heed His Warnings!” wrote one. “The next earthquake may split the Dome of the Rock into three pieces. He will unleash His Wrath on the Nations that move against Israel and on those that want to divide Israel. Israel is God’s Holy Land, Not Man’s! He gave it to the Jews to claim. Best to make True Peace Without Dividing Israel, otherwise face the Wrath of God. Do Not Tempt Thy Lord, Thy God!!!”
“A message telling the Jews not to divide up the land?” wrote another. “On the other hand, a major earthquake would very much divide up the land. Perhaps the message is “Divide fairly or I will do it for you…..”
Some readers saw a more nefarious, human hand at work. One wondered if the quakes were actually a Mossad black-op and that Israel was testing nuclear weapons.
A few non-believers seemed to believe that the earthquakes were, well, just earthquakes.

Posted by: b | Nov 27 2007 16:59 utc | 8

Increased reporting of anything can come from the internal logic of news reporting. What other outlets has already covered is news (logically, it is anything but, but do not mind that), and similar stories to what is already deemed news might also be news. So when something major happens minor instances of the same phennomena is covered more then usual.
If news organisations was more independent and made their own assessments of what to consider news worthy it would not be enough to own some in order to rule them all. And that would be some crazy world.

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Nov 27 2007 18:55 utc | 9

@askod – very good insight – thanks

Posted by: b | Nov 27 2007 19:33 utc | 10

to piggyback on what ASKOD writes, Al Jazeera teevee now proudly tells us that they are “setting the news agenda”
even though they have completely sold out to US/Zionist interests, they may be getting in a little joke on their masters.
on earthquakes, I grew up in area that never had earthquakes and did not experience a significant one until I moved to Italy. I was living on the 7th floor of a 10 story apartment building when this one hit. you can hear what it sounded like here darn thing lasted 55 seconds. I was convinced it was the end and was calmly waiting for the ceiling to collapse on me or the floor to give way, this while holding my 3 month old son in one arm, holding onto a door jam with the other hand, and sliding back and forth on the floor. all your life you know that the ground is solid and never moves, then when it does you find yourself really quite bewildered.

Posted by: dan of steele | Nov 27 2007 19:36 utc | 11

some have predicted that the shrinking of the polar ice caps will release weight on that region of tectonic plates and cause more frequent and violent earthquakes worldwide as the plates find a new equilibrium…
or it may just be media-lemming behaviour as askod says. one paper prints a cute story about Cat Saved Owner from House Fire, and next thing you know, heroic small mammals all over the country are all of a sudden rescuing their domestic humans from various perils. then the lemming herd changes course and it’s all babies kidnapped from 7-11 stores, or OJ, or Britney, or whatever birdie they want us to look at this week…

Posted by: DeAnander | Nov 28 2007 1:08 utc | 12

Just wondering… would dropping a multitude of megaton bombs into the earth have an effect on the stability of tectonic plates?

Posted by: ???? | Nov 28 2007 2:34 utc | 13

@DeAnander #12:
…as the plates find a new equilibrium…
Wouldn’t surprise me at all. You’re talking about huge amounts of water (virtually whole small seas!) being transferred from ice caps into the existing oceans. That’s a lot of extra weight not just being piled anew onto one plate, but being removed from one plate and placed on the other. Net change of pressures at the plate edges would be monstrous!
@DoS #11:
RE: your perceptions of solid ground, lucky you! I have never had such. So Calif is a virtual waterbed.

Posted by: Dr. Wellington Yueh | Nov 28 2007 2:58 utc | 14

The U.S. Geological Survey preliminary magnitude estimate was 5.6, making it the most powerful quake to hit the Bay Area since Loma Prieta, Oct. 17, 1989. That was a magnitude 6.9.
this was a couple weeks ago, 10/30. i felt it big time. we were sitting in the kitchen and all of the sudden all the pottery and light fixtures started shaking.. a lot.

Posted by: annie | Nov 28 2007 3:32 utc | 15

Anything that creates a sense of helpless panic in the masses will be amplified now. Social, political, economic & natural problems & conflicts all will metastasize into looming threats. OMFG it’s all coming down…what ever shall we do…help…NEVER FEAR MY CHILDREN…THE OVERLORDS ARE FORMING A WORLD TOTAL SURVEILLANCE STATE TO BETTER CONTROL ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING & HELP KEEP OUR LOOT…ERRR…YOU SAFE…NOW, BE GOOD CHILDREN, JUST DO AS WE SAY & GO BACK TO YOUR SOMNABULENT STATE…

Posted by: jj | Nov 28 2007 3:34 utc | 16

Let’s get real. Unless you live in an area with basically no recent history of quakes, say London or Washington DC, you just don’t report as “international” or even worthy news any quake below 5.0. And if we’re talking about highly sensitive areas, like the Pacific rim where 2/3 of earthquakes occur, anything below 6.0 is notable only if there are casualties.
You can pick any given week, and pick an earthquake cluster.
That said, as DeAnander said, there may be some increase of seismic activities, first of all in the areas where the ice cap is melting and neighboring plaques. For instance, the Baltic sea’s bottom has been rising since the ice cap melted away 10.000 years ago, and even now Finland and Sweden gain a few squared inches of land as the massive landmass of Scandinavia rises up after having been pushed down by the ice cap for so long. Same will happen with Greenland and Antarctica. Their actual shape – without miles of ice – is quite different from what we see now, but the end result if you melt all that ice would be even more different.
But a global increase in earthquake because the ocean mass increases by some still tiny fraction sounds a bit far-fetched to me. Then I haven’t studied this problem.
???: Good question. I’d suspect that if you nuked (with thousands of megatons) repeatedly some big subduction area, it could trigger something, but that’s just gut-feeling, not scientific expertise. I could be dead wrong.

Posted by: CluelessJoe | Nov 28 2007 9:48 utc | 17

Melting is important, but sliding accompanying earthquakes under the lessened ice is what will destroy the coasts and the now inconvenient populations thereon, and change weights worldwide. Here is UK Guardian url posted here before. Note internal contradictions.

Posted by: plushtown | Nov 28 2007 20:46 utc | 18

In an altered sense I think you nailed it jj.

sense panic
masses amplified
conflicts metastasize
looming threats
SOMNABULENT STATE…

Awakening?!? Me hopes.

Posted by: Juannie | Nov 29 2007 1:50 utc | 19

174 earthquakes in the last week alone
The Nat’l Equake Info Centre estimates there are MILLIONS of quakes every year
Volume of oceans: 1.37 billion cubic kilometers (1.37 × 10**9 km**3, or 0.328 × 10**9 mi.**3)
Surface area of oceans: 361 million sq km (140 million sq mi).
Average ocean depth: 5,000 m (16,000 ft)
more in depth facts aboot the water for more accurate results
Volume of Greenland cap: 2.8 × 10**6 km**3
Volume of Antarctic cap: 30 × 10**6 km**3
Remember 10 percent of ice is above water
Assuming that the ice on Greenland and the Antarctic slides into the water simultaneously, you have all the info you need to make a fairly accurate guess. IMHO, the probability of this occurring is quite small.
Remember that after it all slides in at once, it will eventually melt and that it will reach equlibrium (adding to the bulge caused by the earth’s rotation and yes, slow it some)
What if all the ice melted? fwiw – i have no idea who is this dude but he based his map on a 66ft rise in sea level

Posted by: jcairo | Nov 29 2007 12:37 utc | 20

IMHO, the probability of this occurring is quite small. – that would be the odds of the ice sliding all at once

Posted by: jcairo | Nov 29 2007 14:23 utc | 21

remember, the mass of water equals the volume of ice displacing it
oh, and 16,000 feet of avg, ocean depth
divided by 32ft (depth of water equal to 1 atmosphere at sea level or approx 14lbs/sq inch)
is equal to
500 atmospheres
or 7000lbs per sq inch
So adding another 66ft (+ or -) will add another 28 lbs (+ or -) of pressure at depth on avg.
What? will be
Input? no matter
Earth,
wipe human from shoe
So be it
The most frightening aspect of that ice-less map is the submergence of the Maritimes.
The in-laws are coming, the in-laws are coming
Not that I’m gonna lose any sleep over it happening anytime soon
interesting thought experiment though

Posted by: jcairo | Nov 29 2007 14:57 utc | 22