Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
October 28, 2007
White House Seeks To Extend Its Reach in Cyberspace

(From the masters a fine how propaganda works to create a certain slant. Check the link at the end of the piece.)

Pro-Administration Sites Gain Influence

By Anton Troianovski and Peter Finn
Pravda Foreign News
28. October 2007

WASHINGTON — After ignoring the Internet for years to focus on controlling traditional media such as television and newspapers, the White House and its allies are turning their attention to cyberspace, which remains a haven for critical reporting and vibrant discussion in America’s dwindling public sphere.

Allies of President George W. Bush are creating pro-government news and pop culture Web sites while purchasing some established online outlets known for independent journalism. They are nurturing a network of friendly bloggers ready to disseminate propaganda on command. And there is talk of creating a new American computer network — one that would be separate from the Internet at large and, potentially, much easier for the authorities to control.

"The attractiveness of the Internet as a free platform for free people is already dimming," said Joe  Danner, a mass media expert at Georgetown University in Washington.

Bush addressed the question of Internet censorship during a national broadcast on radio this month. "In the United States, no control is being exercised over the World Wide Web, over the American segment of the Internet," Bush said. "I think that from the point of view of technological solutions, that would not make any sense.

"Naturally, in this sphere, as in other spheres, we should be thinking about adhering to American laws, about making sure that child pornography is not distributed, that financial crimes are not committed," he continued. "But that is a task for the law enforcement agencies. Total control and the work of the law enforcement agencies are two different things."

[…]

Today, the White House is ready with online forces of its own when street action begins.

On September 15, an anti-war movement held a march in central Washington that drew thousands of people; police detained several hundred, including leaders of the march.

Pater Danilin, a 30-year-old Bush supporter and blogger whose online icon is the fearsome robot of the "Terminator" movie, works for a political consulting company loyal to the White House. He said he and his team, which included people from a youth movement called the Young Republicans, quickly started blogging that day about a smaller, pro-White House march held at the same time.

They linked to one another repeatedly and soon, Danilin said, posts about the pro-White House march had crowded out all the items about the opposition march on the Technorati Web portal’s coveted ranking of the top five American blog posts.

"We played it beautifully," Danilin said.

[…]

link

Comments

Friend in the know tell me this: AT&T Scales Back Plan for Citywide Wi-Fi in St. Louis; Now Just Downtown Will Get Signal is happening all across the country. Where telecommunication companies have opted instead to only focus on business districts and centers of power. In other words, city and state municipalities and hubs. In lew of
waiting to see how this model plays out:
Senators Want Probe on [Internet] Content Blocking
Also see, How Comcast Censors Political Content

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Oct 28 2007 11:09 utc | 1

yesterday i had the pleasure of attending the Project Censored Media Accountability Conference. it was a blast w/an awards ceremony (too bad b real couldn’t attend since his africom post made #3 on the list. the director peter phillips told me he was sorry he was unable to attend).
the place was crammed w/independent journalists, filmakers, activists from as far away as haiti and afghanistan. discussion of police state tactics, curtailing debate, suppression of information, retribution for speaking the truth, and gutting the constitution.
Thom Hartmann gave the closing keynote speech w/questions and answers. the last question (paraphrasing)” what do you consider the most important issue as activists we should direct our focus?”
he talked about busting up media consolidation Reagan suspending enforcement of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act …in a nutshell, .

Posted by: annie | Oct 28 2007 17:50 utc | 2

oops, that was supposed to say
in a nutshell, corporate personhood

Posted by: annie | Oct 28 2007 17:53 utc | 3

re annie, #2-3, crabby cartoon on subject of corporate necessarily sociopathic personhood and formerly possible solutionto election aspects.(5th down, Frogs & Maggots)

Posted by: plushtown | Oct 28 2007 18:23 utc | 4

mean lookin’ crabs plush

Posted by: annie | Oct 28 2007 18:28 utc | 5

Annie, sounds like Conference was a high energy place to be. As far as corporate personhood, perhaps you missed the latest. What qualifies these days as the “liberal” wing of the new improved radical right-wing Democratic Party, Robt. Reich, has agreed that Corps. should lose their corporate personhood – but there’s a Catch. In exchange the Predators would cease paying income tax & be immune from all criminal liability. Link
Reich wants a bright line separation between the corporate and the public arenas.
In return, he’d zero out corporate criminal liability and the corporate income tax.
“Companies cannot act with criminal intent because they have no human capacity for intent,” Reich says. “Arthur Andersen may have sounded like a person but the accounting firm was a legal fiction. . . how can any jury, under any circumstances, find that a company ‘knew’ that ‘its’ actions were wrong? A company cannot know right from wrong. A company is incapable of knowing anything. Nor does a company itself take action. Only people know right from wrong, and only people act. That is a basic tenet of democracy.”

Supercapitalism has led to the decline of democracy.
But it need not be.
“We can have a vibrant democracy as well as a vibrant capitalism,” Reich says.
But to get there, we have to separate the private from the public spheres.

But then one expects this sort of hogwash from the Clown who thought it was perfectly fine to destroy our industrial base & build Chinas – although Nixon pointed out that war w/China was inevitable – if only the Predator State would help the newly bankrupted masses to train for their new burger flipping jobs/or whatever the poor fools could find.

Posted by: jj | Oct 28 2007 19:04 utc | 6


“Companies cannot act with criminal intent because they have no human capacity for intent,”

heaven help us

Posted by: annie | Oct 28 2007 19:19 utc | 7

Let me get this straight – they’ve lowered the bar so far that a “win” in their book is gaming Technorati’s rankings??!??
Sweet fuck all – the terrorists have *SO* won.

Posted by: jeremiah | Oct 28 2007 23:17 utc | 8

greenwald
A bizarre, unsolicited email from Gen. Petraeus’ spokesman
unreal/so real, check out the updates..

Posted by: annie | Oct 28 2007 23:25 utc | 9

re #9
i’m not surprised that an army pr (read propaganda) officer lies (that’s their friggin’ job, for chrissakes!) & i’m not surprised that greenwald thinks the military is supposed to or even can be an apolitical institution. but possibly some good will come from a netroots expose of the totalitarian control of info/misinfo/disinfo applied by the govt.
the dod has their blogger roundtables (recent one by theresa whelan on africom seemed to generate several circulating stories, though they all identified the event as their source) and the state dept does something similar, as jendayi frazer has held conference calls on us africa policy w/ reporters & (invited? or at least approved) bloggers.
unfortunately for them, they cannot control foreign media so well, esp at the grassroots level. nowadays, when something scandalous occurs — like bombing a wedding — it becomes common knowledge w/i 24-28 hours amongst an informed segment of the population & from there it gets further disseminated & incorporated into the overall narrative of unfolding events.
this wasn’t the case prior to the internets, when govts could assume lower risks in taking on more unfavorable policies & actions. (it’s easier to force govt in line than it is a citizenry.)
but the u.s. still [pretends to / deludes itself as] the preeminent leader & defender of all the best that the “free world” offers (representative democracy, individual rights & freedoms, the apex of civilized society, free-market economics, etc…) — an absurdity essentially still unchallenged or disputed, thus encouraged, by the rest of the world — and will eventually find itself in an impossible position. pride vs preservation. (more external pressure would help here.)
– – –
great piece by anthro david price, in the oct 16-31 print edition of counterpunch, titled “pilfered scholarship devastates general petraeus’ counterinsurgency field manual”. ends up that the new manual (no. 3-24), which has been spun as a significant work of scholarship & “the philosophical expression of Petraeus’ intellectual strategy for victory in Iraq”, is chalk full of plagiarism.

While I did not perform exhaustive searches, with a little searching in Chapter 3 alone I found about twenty passages showing either direct use of other’s passages without quotes, or heavy reliance on unacknowledged source materials.

These examples show a consistent pattern of unacknowledged use in this chapter. Any author can accidentally drop a quotation mark from a work during the production process, but the extent and consistent pattern of this practice in this Manual is more than common editorial carelessness. The cumulative effect of such non-attributions is devastating to the Manual’s academic integrity.

again, i cannot say i am surprised by this news.

The inability of this chapter’s authors to come up with their own basic definitions of such simple sociocultural concepts as “race,” “culture,” “ritual,” or “social structure” not only raises questions about the ethics of the authors but also furnishes a useful measure of the Manual and its authors’ weak intellectual foundation.

“considering the manual’s importance for iraq,” price concludes,

it is only fitting that American strategists are now trying to win a war based on lies with the stolen words and thoughts of others.

Posted by: b real | Oct 29 2007 3:35 utc | 11

excellent catch b real.

Posted by: annie | Oct 29 2007 10:06 utc | 12

@jeremiah – 8 – Let me get this straight – they’ve lowered the bar so far that a “win” in their book is gaming Technorati’s rankings??!??
I should stop trying satire, shouldn’t I?
The article above is from the Washington Post and titled “Kremlin Seeks To Extend Its Reach in Cyberspace” – I’ve only changed a a few names in it …
The WaPo piece puts Putin in a bad light without any real facts (he actually calls for a uncensored Internet) and that he gets support in some Russian blogs may be a consequence of having a 70% positive rating in Russia.
The piece does not one minute reflect on attacks on Internet independency in the U.S. or the very real use of U.S. administration propaganda through its “independent” Internet outlets.
It was a fine example of lazy propaganda writing.

Posted by: b | Oct 29 2007 16:10 utc | 13