Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
October 15, 2007
Rice’s Non-Diplomacy

Rice’s current foreign trip is a display of incompetence and unwillingness to understand the other side of the table. But in this she is only a sample of the general U.S. foreign policy establishment. There is little hope that the next administration’s policies might be in better shape.

Rice’s visit to Russia, together with SecDef Gates, was a low point as it resulted in exactly zero.

Unprepared and without any item to negotiate about, Rice allowed Putin to run PR rounds around the U.S. team. Only on the second day some hastily improvised package on missile defense was offered. As this was in no way thought through and did not contain any compromise, Russia rejected it.

Rice’s lack of self awareness in her comments about a presidency with too much power was slightly amusing. But her personal lowest point must have been a meeting with the chairwoman of a Russian human rights organization:

[The woman] contended that the United States had “lost the high moral ground,” and thus should join with European countries to make it clear to Mr. Putin that a drift further away from democracy was unacceptable diplomatically.

“The American voice alone doesn’t work anymore,” she said after the meeting. “The Russians are not influenced by it.” She said Ms. Rice had bristled at the criticism, replying sharply, “We never lost the high moral ground.”

Views on that issue seem to differ …

All the while a foreign policy crisis was brewing in Turkey. As there is obviously no other urgent business, the Democratic congress stired up harsh protests from Ankara for acknowledging some ‘genocide’ the Ottoman empire committed on Armenians. Turkey was founded years after this happened as a counterpoint to that empire and will certainly never acknowledge any responsibility for its deeds.

U.S.-Turkey relations are already on the edge as Ankara wants to go after the PKK in Iraq. Rice hastily dispatched two envoys, but as these too where unprepared and offering nothing, their mission failed. Turkey lauched artillery attacks on Kurdish hamlets in Iraq and a vote for a full fledged invasions of northern Iraq is on its parliament task list.

But Rice’s worst performance is her current trip to Israel. While she today says ‘Now is time for Palestinian state’ she is lacking any will to pressure Israel for compromise.

Olmert hinted Monday that he is ready to share control of Jerusalem, saying for the first time that Israel could do without controlling some of the holy city’s outlying Arab neighborhoods.

A big meeting was planed for November as proof to the U.S. Middle East allies that some progress can be made. It will likely not take place at all. Not even the most sycophantic Arab dictator can accept and sell ‘outlying Arab neighborhoods’ in the holy city of Jerusalem as more than an outright insult.

On all three issues – Russia, Turkey and the Middle East – Rice had nothing to offer and accordingly nothing to gain. It is likely that her trip was the last attempt of the Bush administration in the foreign policy field. From now up to the next president, there will only be erratic misbehaviour.

Unfortunately it is not certain that a new administration will do any better.

At the end of the U.S. empire, Le Monde Diplomatique remarks, there could be cooperation:

Yet it is just as likely that US policy will be unpredictable: as all post-colonial experiences show, de-imperialisation is likely to be a long and possibly traumatic process.

Rice’s non-diplomacy might thereby only be the beginning of a long period of U.S. foreign policy chaos.

Comments

It is quite possible that the present US Administration, and how many others, have failed to recognize the ebb of US ability to project power across the world, both morally and through might. The US may still be dominant and scary, but not AS dominant, though maybe more scary. As command ebbs, US will have to offer more and more concrete chips at bargaining tables.
Can this trajectory properly be categorized as de-imperialization? In the traditional sense, yes, a national imperium is losing power. But corporate power is no longer strictly nationalist. Global corporate extension and consolidation is the leading edge and chief operating structure of today’s colonialism, protected and served by national militaries.
Is it possible that those private security forces will become more important as corporations pull farther away from control and regulation by states, that privatization of coercive violence liberates corporate power from state control and any “consent of the governed”?
As one national empire subsides, will its position be filled by other nation-states? Or is a new global corporate imperium emerging? Or some sort of mixed entity, in some ways akin to the mixed rule of the Roman church and monarchical states and families through the European middle ages? Will statist corporate entities, such as of China and new Russia, overwhelm the global corporate cowboys of the west? The global range wars seem already to have begun.
As for Condi’s willingness to offer real concessions in any negotiations, one suspects that, even were she inclined to try, her hands are tied by the war faction within the administration. The two sides appear to have wrestled each other to a draw, where one side cannot launch new attacks and the other side is permitted no trinkets and beads and missile reductions with which to negotiate. For now.

Posted by: small coke | Oct 15 2007 21:59 utc | 1

we know that a war is being prepared every time u s adminstrations do their vaudevillian schtick of peace in palestine, their lofty language of national reconciliation
so ham fisted it’d make buster keaton cry

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 15 2007 22:11 utc | 2

Hm..
Annoying the Russians, insulting the Turks, AND irritating the Arabs, all in one trip.
That’s a pretty amazing record, even for someone in the Bush administration.

Posted by: hopping madbunny | Oct 16 2007 0:56 utc | 3

As Europe becomes more dependent on Russia energy and the USA becomes less dominant, the NATO alliance may loosen up a quite a bit. Simultaneously, China will inevitably begin to enter the higher-end industrial-export markets that Germany comfortably thrives in. This will be an interesting phase to watch as Germany is perhaps the only country that will be able compete with China’s overall export power.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Oct 16 2007 2:37 utc | 4

Annals of Unbelievable Hypocrisy, Exhibit #{We’ve lost track because there have been so many…}

Turkey must “show restraint” and avoid a military raid against Kurdish PKK rebels in northern Iraq, the U.S. said….The U.S. says it is concerned Turkish military action will destabilize Iraq’s relatively peaceful north and has repeatedly warned Turkey to stay out of the country.

Posted by: Bea | Oct 16 2007 2:51 utc | 5

Haaretz: Condi Promises Not to Pressure Israel

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has no intention of imposing on Israel “anything that will not be acceptable to it,” during the negotiations with the Palestinians in preparation for the summit at Annapolis, according to sources in the Prime Minister’s Bureau.

If you read the rest of this article, it’s clear that the whole thing is a charade… no wonder then we the same newspaper includes this news:
Hamas Announces It Will Hold Reconciliation Talks with Fatah
Perhaps the Palestinians have realized that this Great Game is only just that, and perhaps, just perhaps, the price they were being asked to pay in return for playing in the game was too high.
Stay tuned, for this story is only likely to get more interesting as we move closer to the “talks.” Anyone want to make bets on what might happen to sabotage this conference?

Posted by: Bea | Oct 16 2007 3:06 utc | 6

bea, propaganda aside.. the new middle east map (endoresed by US/IS)of kurdistan includes portions of both turkey an iran. no matter how much the US expresses friendship w/turkey the end result cannot happen w/out the US taking sides.
repeatedly warned Turkey to stay out of the country.
nuff said? we are coming down on the side of greater kurdistan. conflict is inevitable.

Posted by: annie | Oct 16 2007 3:09 utc | 7

@annie
So is that perhaps the real underlying reason behind the vote in the house on the Armenian genocide? I couldn’t understand it since it seemed to be an anti-Israel vote (paradoxically, since Turkey is a strong ally of Israel). But maybe the new agenda is more sinister than that — all in the support of ethnically based states in the region? This is pure speculation on my part. I really didn’t understand that vote (given that the House seems to fall in line with whatever the Israeli lobby wants…)

Posted by: Bea | Oct 16 2007 3:15 utc | 8

“Rice’s current foreign trip is a display of incompetence and unwillingness to understand the other side of the table.”
I disagree. I think Rice knows exactly what she’s doing. What she says and does is approved policy, not incompetence.

Posted by: steve | Oct 16 2007 4:13 utc | 9

A view on Rice by a Russian sexist: Condoleezza Rice’s anti-Russian stance based on sexual problems

Ms. Rice’s criticism can be explained with the politician’s personal peculiarities. Why is Condoleezza Rice so fond of her “strict teacher” role? Is it her technique that she follows to stay in the center of political attention? The leader of the Liberal and Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), Vladimir Zhirinovsky, expressed his opinion on the matter in an exclusive interview with Pravda.Ru.

”Condoleezza Rice released a coarse anti-Russian statement. This is because she is a single woman who has no children. She loses her reason because of her late single status. Nature takes it all.

”The civilized world needs to think about a decision when single politicians are not allowed to stay in power. This was a common practice in the Soviet political system. The matter of international relations is very subtle and exquisite. One single word or phrase may play an extremely important role in politics. This is not the place, where one can sublimate their personal sexual problems.

”The true reason of Ms. Rice’s attack against Russia is very simple. Condoleezza Rice is a very cruel, offended woman who lacks men’s attention. Releasing such stupid remarks gives her the feeling of being fulfilled. This is the only way for her to attract men’s attention,” Vladimir Zhirinovsky said.

Those were the mild quotes …

Posted by: b | Oct 16 2007 6:00 utc | 10

More FP desaster (though this one is in my view a good one) Nuclear Deal With India May Be Near Collapse

Neither government appeared eager to announce the setback to what had been billed as one of the Bush administration’s biggest foreign policy achievements. India’s only official pronouncement was tucked at the bottom of a seven-paragraph news release on the Indian Embassy Web site outlining a telephone conversation Monday between Singh and Bush.
“The Prime Minister also explained to President Bush that certain difficulties have arisen with respect to the operationalisation of the India-U.S. civil nuclear cooperation agreement,” said the release, …

Posted by: b | Oct 16 2007 6:03 utc | 11

William Pfaff: A Non-interventionist American Foreign Policy

It’s been five years since the U.S Congress authorized George Bush to invade Iraq. The editor of The Nation magazine has marked the anniversary with an article deploring a policy debate that offers “no coherent alternative to George Bush’s disastrous foreign policies.”
This is not true. There has always been a coherent alternative, its origins deep in the American nation’s historical experience, articulated after the second world war by policy thinkers then described as non-interventionist, and attacked as “neo-isolationist,” …

What I have said here (and said at greater length in The New York Review of Books last February 15), may make me sound like a member of the “old blame-America” crowd. I am actually a member of the much older “why don’t we mind our own affairs, and leave it to others to mind theirs” crowd. I think the serious danger to America is its pseudo-Marxist ideology of aggressive world security hegemony, held by the Bush government and most of the Democratic presidential candidates. But please, Katrina vanden Heuvel, there is an alternative.

Posted by: b | Oct 16 2007 6:32 utc | 12

A shallow and disappointing analysis, Bernhard.
There are two types of diplomatic events/visits: Those where a program or treaty has been worked out in advance by subordinates, and the trip is planned for maximum PR value, and those where information needs to be discussed, views shared, and reactions gauged. This trip, as the majority of Bush diplomatic sorties clearly does not fall into the former category, but rather the later.
Working visits, as this one is, are always designed to mislead the public, and the world, as to their intentions. Who knows what really was discussed? It could be any number of things: War with Iran, Central Asia, Euro pipeline games, international banking crises, heads up to a new 9/11. You have not offered anything substantive here in probing beneath the surface, the public facade, as to what is really going on.
That said, yes the PR campaign was laughable.
Rice is incompetent only to the extent that the Chenyite extremist policies, of which she stood as a counterweight and should not take personal responsibility, did not work for the increasingly desperate ruling class. She is bright, and a capable negotiator — fully competent to perform her job of misleading the US public and stealing for the rich.
Steve #9, and r’giap #2, are closer to the mark.
Israeli diplomacy game is meant to distract the masses and fill up column inches. The real story is Israel taking irrevokable steps to render Palestinian statehood impossible by severing the West Bank in two: Israel largely drawing its own border with Palestinians, despite upcoming peace conference. Anyway, like Clinton, the way to handle the Palestinans is to run out the clock until it is too late, then appear to engage in last minute frantic negotiations guaranteed to fail, and blame the Palestinians afterwards. Nothing new here.
It is hard to know what is up with Turkey. Clearly, the Turkish military has historically been very close with the US hegemon, who has trained the entire ruling cadre. Several possibilities come to mind. One, Turkey, as Britain, sees the Iraq disaster and is trying to interpose a little space between their position and the US. Two, as we know, The Surge was really meant to attempt to break Iraq into three, not to restore order as publicly claimed, and this current ploy is designed to give Turkey breathing room and an excuse to help with the northern part of that exercize. Three, this is part of the Russian/Europe pipeline game.
But yes, the entire world, not just the US, stands on the precipice of catastrophe: the complete meltdown of the int’l banking system, along with all the other disasters, ecological and otherwise, we are aware of. So, and increased sense of desperation is starting to show through.
Zirinovsky is the worst type of demagogue, and viewing elite diplomacy as a function of personality is a complete mystification of world power dynamics; just pointless trash.
Pfaff has long been a voice of relative sanity along the Paul Craig Roberts/Eisenhower vein of Ur-Republicans. Despite the NYTimes’ purchase of the International Herald Tribune, he has been left surprisingly undisturbed, perhaps a function of his long career and his ample ex-pat and European readership, for whom he speaks. However, calling the US “pseudo-Marxist” is only a cheap way of slurring Marxism, which has far more to offer the world than Pfaff.

Posted by: Malooga | Oct 16 2007 8:24 utc | 13

You have not offered anything substantive here in probing beneath the surface, the public facade, as to what is really going on.
Well – do you know? What I gauged from Putin’s behaviour and the Russian media was that there was simply nothing. Offers were expected but not delivered. To rescue the trip Gates came up late with a missile defense “compromise” that was none .. Hard to “analyse” when there is nothing.
I’m quite sure a decent FP player would have done much better than Rice on all three issues above. It is just much over her capabilities. So I’ll stick with incompetence on her part.

Posted by: b | Oct 16 2007 8:50 utc | 14

There is nothing on the surface.
Rice does not fly to Moscow because she wants to buy another pair of new shoes. Actually, maybe I should take that last sentence back-)

Posted by: Malooga | Oct 16 2007 9:28 utc | 15

Sorry for the long quote from a much lengthier article. Worth reading, though.
The “Great Game” Enters the Mediterranean: Gas, Oil, War, and Geo-Politics

History is in the making. The Second Summit of Caspian Sea States in Tehran will change the global geo-political environment. This article also gives a strong contextual background to what will be in the backdrop at Tehran. The strategic course of Eurasia and global energy reserves hangs in the balance.
It is no mere chance that before the upcoming summit in Tehran that three important post-Soviet organizations (the Commonwealth of Independents States, the Collective Security Treaty Organization, and the Eurasian Economic Community) simultaneously held meetings in Tajikistan. Nor is it mere coincidence that the SCO and CSTO have signed cooperation agreements during these meetings in Tajikistan, which has effectively made China a semi-formal member of the CSTO alliance. It should be noted that all SCO members are also members of CSTO, aside from China.
This is all in addition to the fact that the U.S. Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, and the U.S. Secretary of Defence, Robert Gates, were both in Moscow for important, but mostly hushed, discussions with the Kremlin before Vladimir Putin is due to arrive in Iran. This could have been America’s last attempt at breaking the Chinese-Russian-Iranian coalition in Eurasia. World leaders will watch for any public outcomes from the Russian President’s visit to Tehran. It is also worth noting that NATO’s Secretary-General was in the Caucasus region for a brief visit in regards to NATO expansion. The Russian President will also be in Germany for a summit with Angela Merkel before arriving in Tehran.
On five fronts there is antagonism between the U.S. and its allies with Russia, China, and their allies: East Africa, the Korean Peninsula, Indo-China, the Middle East, and the Balkans. While the Korean front seems to have calmed down, the Indo-China front has been heated up with the start of instability in Myanmar (Burma). This is part of the broader effort to encircle the titans of the Eurasian landmass, Russia and China. Simultaneous to all this, NATO is preparing itself for a possible showdown with Serbia and Russia over Kosovo. These preparations include NATO military exercises in Croatia and the Adriatic Sea.
In May, 2007 the Secretary-General of CSTO, Nikolai Bordyuzha invited Iran to apply to the Eurasian military pact; “If Iran applies in accordance with our charter, [CSTO] will consider the application,” he told reporters. In the following weeks, the CSTO alliance has also announced with greater emphasis, like NATO, that it too is prepared to get involved in Afghanistan and global “peacekeeping” operations. This is a challenge to NATO’s global objectives and in fact an announcement that NATO no longer has a monopoly as the foremost global military organization.
The globe is becoming further militarized than what it already is by two military blocs. In addition, Moscow has also stated that it will now charge domestic prices for Russian weaponry and military hardware to all CSTO members. Also, reports about the strengthening prospects of a large-scale Turkish invasion of Northern Iraq are getting stronger, which is deeply related to Anglo-American plans for balkanizing Iraq and sculpting a “New Middle East.” A global showdown is in the works.
Finally, the Second Summit of Caspian Sea States will also finalize the legal status of the Caspian Sea. Energy resources, ecology, energy cooperation, security, and defensive ties will also be discussed. The outcome of this summit will decide the nature of Russo-Iranian relations and the fate of Eurasia. What happens in Tehran may decide the course of the the rest of this century. Humanity is at an important historical crossroad. This is why I felt that it was important to release this second portion of the original article before the Second Summit of the Caspian Sea States.

Posted by: Malooga | Oct 16 2007 15:36 utc | 16

And on the heels of the Tehran conference of the Caspian, a Big Oil scrum in Kuwait masquerading as a trade show, to push through that Iraqi oil law and who knows what else. Dick and Dumya’s brain trust. The graphic is worth the click.

[A] huge conference is taking place in Kuwait (wherethings are nice and safe and Blackwater doesn’t provide security) near the end of this month sponsored by almost every major player in the international Oil Industry. While it is billed as a huge Oil Industry trade show, in fact as any number of industry insiders have pointed out, its real purpose is to put major pressure on the Iraqi Central Government (giggle) to finish the dayam Oil Law or risk having the majors refuse to deal at all. The major oil companies have indicated that if the Oil Law is not passed by the time the new President (whoever it is) takes office, they won’t be able to negotiate any new PSA’s until another Republican administration takes over (which is rather unlikely before say, 2017 at the earliest.)

link h/t HOK for pointing this blog re: Turkey

Posted by: small coke | Oct 16 2007 17:12 utc | 17

First link @17, to Kuwait oil trade show and graphics, is pdf. I should have mentioned.

Posted by: small coke | Oct 16 2007 17:22 utc | 18

@ small coke,
interesting that the hands holding the world are white and the nails are bitten nearly to the quick. the white part is a no brainer but it must be nerve wracking riding this particular tiger.

Posted by: dan of steele | Oct 16 2007 19:19 utc | 19