Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 6, 2007
OT 07-62

These threads fill up faster and faster … news & views …

Comments

McClatchey commentator Joe Galloway: Can’t we do better than this?

Don’t rest your hopes on the Democrats who now allegedly control both houses of Congress.
The White House, as soon as it’s watched Congress choke down the so-called Petraeus report and recommendations, will promptly demand that the same Congress vote another surge in the war budget — adding another $50 billion to what’s already been approved.
The Democrats will whine and moan and bloviate and then, like lapdogs, they’ll roll over and approve the money, proving that they’re even bigger cowards than Bush or Cheney are.
In the end, there’s no difference between Republicans and Democrats, or only subtle superficial differences in their hypocrisies. When it comes to getting their snouts in the trough of public and private and corporate money, they all spring from the same porcine roots.

Posted by: b | Sep 6 2007 9:13 utc | 1

Tragedy has its own logic and it is completely different from what is thought as rational thought. Events proceed while some hapless being tries to mould them and at the end the fellow blinds himself or perhaps further on when very weak blind and in despair the gods offer him a place of rest.

Posted by: jlcg | Sep 6 2007 11:22 utc | 2

Air Force investigates mistaken transport of nuclear warheads

The Air Force announced that all flights of fighters and bombers in the United States will be halted on September 14 to allow for a review of procedures.

uh, mhmmmm? *ears pull back like a cautious cat*
Also don’t miss my earlier post: Congressional oversight is just helping the terrorists! sez Chertoff as well as others comments on this particular topic from last ot.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 6 2007 11:43 utc | 3

Something is up today. maybe Syria is going to be the scapegoat for Shrub’s frustration/penis envy or whatever. Al-Jazeera has just flashed up that Syria launched an air strike on Syria. The Syrians have attacked the Israelis for violating airspace dropping bombs?

Posted by: Debs is Dead | Sep 6 2007 11:55 utc | 4

Israel launched a strike on syria. The ‘bombs’ may have been ammunition

Posted by: Debs is Dead | Sep 6 2007 11:58 utc | 5

Michael Ledeen
Nuff said…
More importantly…Managing Nuclear Weapons Custody
There are conflicting reports… in one report it was about 5 nukes, the other one about 6 nukes… so we possibly have 1 missing nuke… perhaps the whole gist of this thing is that this is supposed to be the “one bomb away from getting rid of the FISA court” bomb… perhaps this isnt a message to iran… but a message to someone within the US…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 6 2007 12:13 utc | 6

Haaretz reports this as “Syria says Israel bombed Syrian targets” at midnight. Israel, of course, refuses all comment on the matter.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 6 2007 12:13 utc | 7

Contradictory reports on Gaza:
Haaretz Editorial:

The distress of Israel’s government, which is responsible for defending its citizens, periodically gives rise – and with greater force than usual this week – to desperate ideas. One such idea, which is being advocated by Minister Haim Ramon and, more guardedly, by Defense Minister Ehud Barak, is hitting Gaza’s water and electricity networks. Stopping the flow of water and electricity is a painful and punishing step, but ostensibly not a fatal one. Its goal is to cause the Palestinian public to pressure Hamas and Islamic Jihad to stop the fire.
This idea is complete nonsense. Factually speaking, cutting off water and electricity can kill. Moreover, there is no proof that making the Palestinian public suffer would make Hamas take pity on it and embark on a cease-fire. On the contrary: Hamas consistently sabotages the flow of essential goods through Gaza’s border terminals. What is being presented as a way to avoid war is counterproductive, immoral and illegal.
Public posturing will neither solve the problem of the Qassam rockets nor protect the children of Sderot. The current defense priority is “Syria first.” Until the danger of war in the North has passed, and in light of the many vacation days during the upcoming holiday season, the government should transfer classes from communities within Qassam range to those farther from Gaza – something it would have to do anyway in the event of a major military operation against the Qassams. It should also warn Gaza’s Hamas government that if it does not exercise its responsibility to stop assaults against Israel from the Strip, Israel – at a time of its choosing, and without taking any steps that would necessarily harm civilians – will wage war against all those who attack it from there.

Israeli Defense Minister Barak makes threatening noises again about a full-scale invasion of Gaza. Yet Haaretz reports that the IDF objects to this move, and no real preparations are being made for it, because the tension with Syria is currently so high. After a cabinet meeting on the matter:

Olmert asked the defense establishment, the Foreign Ministry and Justice Ministry officials to prepare plans that would take into consideration the “military and civilian implications of stoping services provided to the Gaza Strip by Israel.”

And yet, the army overnight reportedly moved 1 km into the Strip.

Three Palestinian militants were killed Thursday and six others wounded in an Israel Defense Forces strike in the southern Gaza Strip….
The strike came as IDF troops backed by tanks and bulldozers moved a kilometer inside the Gaza Strip to strike at Palestinian militants on Thursday.

Ummm… bulldozers? Does that mean they are demolishing more structures along the border? Just wondering.
All in all, these various bits of news from the different posters here do not bode well for the month of September.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 6 2007 12:28 utc | 8

Human Rights Watch issues damning report on last year’s Lebanon War

In its latest report on the 34-day conflict, the rights group said that “in critical respects, Israel conducted the war with reckless indifference to the fate of Lebanese civilians and violated the laws of war.
“Responsibility for the high civilian death toll of the war in Lebanon lies squarely with Israeli policies and targeting decisions in the conduct of its military operations,” the report adds.
The report accuses Israel of undertaking a deliberate campaign not only against Hezbollah’s military wing, but its political and social welfare institutions in Beirut and southern Lebanon.
“Israel targeted people or structures associated in any way with Hezbollah’s military, political, or social structures — regardless of whether they constituted valid military objectives.”
“Israel’s treatment of all parts of Hezbollah as legitimate military targets flies in the face of international legal standards and sets a dangerous precedent,” said Kenneth Roth, HRW executive director, in a press release.
The rights watchdog also rejected Israeli claims that the high civilian death toll resulted from Hezbollah operating in civilian areas and using human shields.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 6 2007 12:40 utc | 9

I meant to include the following also in #9:

The [HRW] report comes days after a separate study that accused Hezbollah of targeting civilians in its rocket attacks against Israel. That report was slammed by both Hezbollah and the Lebanese government, forcing HRW to cancel an August press conference in Beirut after reports that Hezbollah planned to disrupt the event.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 6 2007 12:43 utc | 10

Nahr al-Bared residents in despair over complete destruction of the camp.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 6 2007 12:50 utc | 11

UN report: Palestinians Poorer Than Ever
This article provides some very grim economic statistics.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 6 2007 12:55 utc | 12

Lebanon’s presidential elections have now officially been scheduled for September 25. Here are some pieces that help provide more background into understanding the complex political issues surrounding the all-important presidential election:
Speaker of Parliament, Nabih Berry, calls for parliament to convene and elect a new President Sept. 25.

[Current President pro-Syrian] Lahoud’s mandate was extended for three years in September 2004 under a controversial constitutional amendment passed with the support of Syria, which at the time was the key power-broker in Lebanon.
While the anti-Syrian camp holds the majority in parliament, the opposition led by the Hezbollah party walked out of the Siniora cabinet in November, leaving the government paralyszed.
Berri, who himself heads the pro-Syrian Amal party, has since refused to convene parliament on the grounds that the rump Siniora government was no longer legitimate….
The vote for a successor to Syrian-backed President Emile Lahoud has exacerbated the country’s political crisis which has split Beirut into pro- and anti-Damascus camps.
If the necessary two-thirds majority quorum – or at least 86 members present in the 128-seat parliament – is not guaranteed on September 25, Berri will have to call for another session before Lahoud’s term expires on November 24.
“We hope that you attend the session,” Berri told MPs in the official invitation, the spokesman said.

An in-depth piece from the Lebanese press on this development. Some key points:

Last week, Berri called for a consensus candidate [ie, someone who would be acceptable to both sides, thereby breaking the deadlock that had ensued from the walkout, and threatened to produce two separate governments if each side elected its own President.] The ruling majority hasn’t officially responded, but according to Youth and Sports Minister Ahmad Fatfat, they are not against the idea of a consensus candidate.
“There has been an overall positive reaction to Berri’s initiative by the leading figures in the ruling camp,” Fatfat told The Daily Star on Wednesday.
“It is a positive step,” he said. “This could be the step needed to open the doors for dialogue between the rical politicians.”
“We are willing to head to dialogue, and discuss Berri’s initiative but without any preconditions,” Fatfat said.
“However, we do not want to give up our political right to elect the next president by a half plus one [majority],” he added.
Fatfat explained that once there is agreement on a consensus president, controversy on how the election actually happens won’t matter.
At the same time, Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea’s reaction to the initiative can be characterized as skeptical.
“Why does the Berri initiative stress the two-thirds quorum for the election of the next president when it calls for a consensus president?” Geagea asked on Lebanese Broadcasting Corp. TV late Tuesday.
To garner the necessary quorum for electing a president, a compromise must be reached by the feuding parties in Lebanon, as the ruling majority of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora has just 69 MPs.
The opposition has threatened to boycott the vote and deny Parliament a two-thirds quorum, thus blocking the process.
In return, the majority has threatened to go ahead and choose a president from its own ranks with its majority….
Lahoud has said he would appoint an interim government headed by army chief General Michel Suleiman [the newly minted “hero of Nahr al-Bared,” as we noted earlier] if rival Lebanese factions cannot agree on a new head of a state before the presidential term ends.

A piece by a Syrian analyst, posted on Syria Comment, offering a different perspective on Berri’s call for a “consensus candidate.”

Posted by: Bea | Sep 6 2007 13:10 utc | 13

A different excerpt of b’s link in #1 expresses solidarity with

the half a percent of Americans who do the fighting and dying and suffering — and their families — who must soldier on in a lost war, taking orders from a commander-in-chief who gets his advice from a vice president who sleeps in a different bed every night, fearing that the bad guys are coming to get him.

The bit about Cheney sleeping a different bed every night feels demonstrably false. Is there any corroboration?

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Sep 6 2007 13:30 utc | 14

Just to add to Bea’s post #11:
“These politicians allowed the Lebanese army to destroy the whole camp,” said former Nahr al-Bared resident Abdel Salaam Khader, who lost a brother in the fighting. “We have been exposed many, many times to Israeli bombs, but even the Israelis destroyed certain places and not a whole camp.”
Hamas Flag Goes Up in Lebanon Camps
Ever notice how America’s “moderate” friends in the ME seem to be exceedingly bloodthirsty? Even the Sabra and Chatila massacres, which the Arabs generally like to blame Israel for, was actually done by Lebanese Arabs. The real irony about the siege was the crowd of white people in Lebanon protesting the brutality of the siege.

Posted by: Sam | Sep 6 2007 13:51 utc | 15

@Hannah – google “cheney” “undisclosed location” – it’s a running joke since Cheney was hiding several times for “security reasons”.

Posted by: b | Sep 6 2007 13:56 utc | 16

Hannah K. O’Luthon:
The bit about Cheney sleeping a different bed every night feels demonstrably false. Is there any corroboration?
I’m sure he didn’t do it every night since 9/11, but when Joe Galloway says it you can bet there is something behind it. As far I’m concerned Joe is one of the best reporters in the US.
Incidently your comments about the Baathists in the OT 07-61 thread:
The U.S. electorate, alas, will very probably fail to note that its sons and daughters are slaughtering and being slaughtered in Iraq on behalf of the very group whose ouster justified the beginning of the slaughter.
How do you tell that to a mother that sacrificed her child for that? Pretty powerful stuff.
accidentally posted this in that thread sorry

Posted by: Sam | Sep 6 2007 14:05 utc | 17

Thanks b:
Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Vice President Cheney and President Bush were kept in physically distant locations for security reasons. For a period Cheney was not seen in public, remaining in an undisclosed location and communicating with the White House via secure video phones.
The very brave dick

Posted by: Sam | Sep 6 2007 14:12 utc | 18

would like to write something about the german terror plot”, but i’m leaving for holidays at the very moment…
the media is blowing up the story like no good, but when you look closely to what actually happened, its totally nonsense. the group has been observated for a long time, and their actually have been several articles about their plans in the media some months ago… to go on after that doesn’t sound like they are the well organized, international linked islamic gods of terror. they are said to have contact with the “Islamic Jihad Union”, an orginasation which Craig Murray believes only exists as an multi-purpose propaganda tool.
it stinks to heaven. behind the apparent inconsistencies, the big media just goes like “the end is near, have fear”. and bavarian hero beckstein calls for the observation of anybody who converts to islam. its spinning faster…
now that i learned this is not an “american” blog, here is a german source giving some background. may be somone is interestet to write about it.

Posted by: snafu | Sep 6 2007 15:15 utc | 19

would like to write something about the german terror plot”, but i’m leaving for holidays at the very moment…
the media is blowing up the story like no good, but when you look closely to what actually happened, its totally nonsense. the group has been observated for a long time, and their actually have been several articles about their plans in the media some months ago… to go on after that doesn’t sound like they are the well organized, international linked islamic gods of terror. they are said to have contact with the “Islamic Jihad Union”, an orginasation which Craig Murray believes only exists as an multi-purpose propaganda tool.
it stinks to heaven. behind the apparent inconsistencies, the big media just goes like “the end is near, have fear”. and bavarian hero beckstein calls for the observation of anybody who converts to islam. its spinning faster…
now that i learned this is not an “american” blog, here is a german source giving some background. may be somone is interestet to write about it.

Posted by: snafu | Sep 6 2007 15:16 utc | 20

snafu,
I had to ask myself: “why would they want to attack a ‘hard target’ like a US military base in Germany when there are so many less well-guarded targets about?”.
But don’t forget, Uncle Wolfgang Schäuble, the German Minister of Interior Affairs, has been pushing for the right to send fake e-mails to implant “Trojan horse” viruses on suspected computers.
So now it looks like he has a lot more support for sending Love Letters from Uncle Wolfgang. I will never open another mail ever again…

Posted by: ralphieboy | Sep 6 2007 16:33 utc | 21

Anyone want to put odds on either a false flag attack or a small new war in the middle east occurring between now and sept. 15?

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 6 2007 16:49 utc | 22

I’m not a gambler but I put a red ‘x’ on my calendar (the 14th) per Uncle’s #3.

Posted by: beq | Sep 6 2007 16:56 utc | 23

in the next 9 days????

Posted by: annie | Sep 6 2007 16:57 utc | 24

Vanity Fair: Billions over Baghdad

But after the money was delivered to Iraq, oversight and control evaporated. Of the $12 billion in U.S. banknotes delivered to Iraq in 2003 and 2004, at least $9 billion cannot be accounted for. A portion of that money may have been spent wisely and honestly; much of it probably wasn’t. Some of it was stolen.
Once the money arrived in Iraq it entered a free-for-all environment where virtually anyone with fingers could take some of it. Moreover, the company that was hired to keep tabs on the outflow of money existed mainly on paper. Based in a private home in San Diego, it was a shell corporation with no certified public accountants. Its address of record is a post-office box in the Bahamas, where it is legally incorporated. That post-office box has been associated with shadowy offshore activities.

Plus a Q&A with the authors of the piece: The Booty Vanishes

. The thing here is, nobody wants to talk about it in any way. And it does raise the question: Is there something beyond the waste, the fraud, and the basic corruption? Was some of this money used for purposes we can’t even imagine? You just don’t know. Because of the unique nature of the Coalition Provisional Authority, which wasn’t an entity of the United States government and wasn’t an entity of the United Nations, it was not subject to the normal auditing and budgetary constraints of a lot of our defense programs. There was even less oversight with them than in the usual process, and that’s why the fraud was so rampant, and the corruption, and so forth. Add to that the chaos in Baghdad and Iraq that first year. Oh gosh, that must seem like the good ol’ days now. The other thing that struck us is that nobody in any kind of official capacity seems to be upset by this. And that’s amazed us as much as anything.

Posted by: b | Sep 6 2007 17:30 utc | 25

@Malooga (#22)
Anyone want to put odds on either a false flag attack or a small new war in the middle east occurring between now and sept. 15?
Doesn’t seem entirely unreasonable… at least according to mats.

Posted by: Monolycus | Sep 6 2007 17:45 utc | 26

Uh, you may want to sit down for this one, pour your self a tall stiff drink, take a couple of deep long breaths, drink that drink, then pour another…
Torture Bible” now online (you might want to get this file before it’s gone)
Psychological “torture bible” published in 1961 reappears online

If you were to begin researching interrogation, interviewing, and brainwashing techniques, you would eventually notice that one particular interesting-sounding volume appears over and over again in the relevant bibliographies: something called The Manipulation of Human Behavior, published in 1961 [by John Wiley & Sons].
Based on the compelling title and the fact that just about every publication in the subject area cites it, you would then probably try to seek it out for yourself–only to discover that it has never been reprinted.
Then you’d find out a bit more: the book is a compilation of seven research reports, and funded at least in large part by the United States government. You can even track down the table of contents online, and your jaw may drop when you read the chapter titles:
* The Physiological State of the Interrogation Subject as it Affects Brain Function
* The Effects of Reduced Environmental Stimulation on Human Behavior: A Review
* The Use of Drugs in Interrogation
* Physiological Responses as a Means of Evaluating Information
* The Potential Uses of Hypnosis in Interrogation
* The Experimental Investigation of Interpersonal Influence
* Countermanipulation through Malingering
These articles were written by the people who were paid by the US government, mostly in the 1950s, to research brainwashing and interrogation techniques by giving people drugs, placing them under sensory deprivation, hypnotizing them, etc. etc. Many of these experiments essentially involve torture and are likely to be widely regarded as highly unethical. This is fundamental research, and if there was any followup research done, it has not yet been published for public consumption.
This book is of enormous historical importance, and yet is largely unavailable. If you live in the United States, this is some of what your government was up to in the fifties. I doubt that their funding of these ideas stopped with the publication of this volume.

Also see, Biderman’s Chart of Coercion.’

Air Force psychologist Alfred Biderman examined the US prisoners from the Korean War to see why so many had been complicit with their captors.
Biderman codified the 8 tactics used to defeat human will and this is called
‘Biderman’s Chart of Coercion.’

A study was conducted in the 1950s after the release of US prisoners of the Korean War to learn about their experiences and the behaviors of their captors. Biderman’s Chart of Coercion was developed from that study and shows the methods used by captors to brainwash prisoners and force compliance. Several decades later, when more was known about family violence and abuse in relationships, it was recognized that for many people experience abuse the methods appeared to be the same.
This chart was adapted from Biderman’s Chart of Coercion to reflect methods of brainwashing in an abusive relationship. The second column was taken directly from Biderman’s Chart of Coercion, and the third column was adapted for abusive relationships. Parts of this chart may reflect your experience in your relationship.

Biderman’s Chart of Coercion
Isolation
Deprives victim of all social support for the ability to resist
Develops an intense concern with self
Makes victim dependent upon the interrogator
Monopolization of perception
Fixes attention upon immediate predicament; fosters introspection
Eliminates stimuli competing with those controlled by captor
Frustrates all actions not consistent with compliance
Induced physical and mental exhaustion
Weakens physical and mental ability to resist
Threats
Cultivates anxiety and despair
Occasional indulgences
Provides positive motivation for compliance
Hinders adjustment to deprivation

Demonstrating ‘omnipotence’

Suggests futility of resistance
Degradation
Makes cost of resistance appear more damaging to self esteem than capitulation
Reduces prisoner to “animal level” concerns
Enforcing trivial demands
Develops habit compliance

A shorter version of Biderman’s Chart of Coercion is DRTC.
(I remember this with a mnemonic device as “Dirt, see?”)
Disorientation = inflict intense stimuli to disrupt autonomy
Regression = push into a submissive role of seeking relief
Transference = offer the source of relief
Compliance = obtain cooperation in exchange for relief
Recommended book- ‘Coercion: Why We Listen to What ‘They’ Say’ by Douglas Rushkoff.
He does a good job of showing the commonalities in CIA interrogation techniques and corporate sales scripts used by car dealers, retail, and even cults.
_________________

Torture For Fun and Profit

If torture doesn’t work, as is demonstrated below, it must be done for reasons other than intellligence gathering. Those reasons may vary, though all of them must violate basic human dignity, not only for the victims, but for the perpetrators as well.
The CIA’s Torture Teachers: Psychologists Helped the CIA Exploit a Secret Military Program to Develop Brutal Interrogation Tactics
Oh, just in case your not sick yet:
I posted about this a few ago, and I was surprized that it didn’t get nary a comment, behold:
Torture school subjects children to lethal punishments in America no doubt…
Finally, Coalition Against Psychiatric Assault
Indeed, here is a soundtrack/youtoobz link to listen to while perusing the above info… Frank Zappa: ‘The Torture Never Stops’
Question: If by using the figure above i.e., Biderman’s Chart of Coercion, more specifically, DRTC is used on a micro individual level, how does one expand it via compare and contrast to encompass the micro level? E.g, the population? Grep wot I sed!?
Discuss…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 6 2007 17:45 utc | 27

don’t get all spun up about the B-52 incident. This was a big screw-up that ordinarily would not get press. The Air Force can transfer all the nukes they want to without anyone ever finding out about it. At no time was anyone in danger.
It is a good thing that this came to light as it gives some hope that there still remains a tiny bit of transparency in our government. you can be sure that the wing commander at Minot would have preferred this not be widely known. Grounding all aircraft for one day is a CYA (cover your ass) for the commanders as well. necessary training could be reviewed without grounding the jets but it looks more serious when you don’t let distractions like flying keep you from concentrating on safety procedures and proper documentation of maintenance performed.
what the story does is distract from the shit that continues to happen in Iraq. the noise machines are going full blast with the HUGE TERROR ACT AVERTED in Germany and other such nonsense.
we now return to our regularly scheduled program…

Posted by: dan of steele | Sep 6 2007 17:49 utc | 28

*Macro

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 6 2007 17:56 utc | 29

Speaking of distractions.
From firedoglake:

Bush’s petulant, childish bullying tactics may have reached around and bit him in the ass this time. In the wake of the all-out effort to relenetlessly push him off the stage, Larry now seems defiant — emboldened by the support of, yes, Arlen Specter, who just may not be so happy about those ads running in his back yard and everything they symbolize. General Petraeus’ carefully choreographed 9/11 report on teh most awesome surge, aided and abetted by a phalanx of compromised and credulous pundits, PR spinners, think tank personel and other assorted wankers may go down in a blaze of Larry Craig’s bathroom stall glory.
Call it “the revenge of the lily-livered bastard.”

Posted by: beq | Sep 6 2007 18:01 utc | 30

Chemical ‘WMD’ found at U.N. may be little more than cleaner
As usual, the retraction comes two weeks later when the sheep are busy looking at the next little morality play concocted for their eternal training and edification.
We should keep a scoreboard of these events and chart and analyze the outcomes for each new shocking story over time. Then we could find patterns — reporters, newspapers, the need for changing the topic, whatever — to these stories.
Would be a good tool to share with the wingnuts out there.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 6 2007 18:37 utc | 31

in case there is someone who was wondering what happened to Riverbend, it seems she and her family made it to Syria. Like all of her posts, this too is very sad and revealing of the human suffering we have caused.
link

Posted by: dan of steele | Sep 6 2007 18:37 utc | 32

Mortgages in foreclosure at record high

The rate of home loans in foreclosure rose to a record high in the second quarter of 2007 as more homeowners in California, Florida and other states could not refinance their adjustable-rate mortgages, a trade group said on Thursday.

It was the third straight quarter in which the foreclosure rate rose to a record-setting level and the worst is likely still ahead, the MBA said.

There are some five variations of headlines now at Yahoo news that say something like Stocks advance with economy optimism
There is no headline on Yahoo or Bloomberg that really explains why the markets are up on bad news. So we have to turn to the Canadian Press to learn: Fed steps up money market cash inflows amid ABCP rollover woes

The Federal Reserve injected $31.25 billion into money markets through three repurchase agreements on Thursday – the largest amount it’s injected in weeks in its effort to ease credit tightness.

Fuck. Inflation. Can’t. Let. The. Markets. Down.

Posted by: b | Sep 6 2007 18:39 utc | 33

how ’bout this?
bloomsberg: U.S. Warns of Terror Threat to Interests in Nigeria

Sept. 6 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. mission in Nigeria said it received information that U.S. and other “Western” interests in the country are at risk of a terrorist attack.
Potential targets include diplomatic buildings and businesses in Abuja, the capital, and Lagos, the commercial center, according to a statement released today by the U.S. consulate in Lagos.
The warning, just days before the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in the U.S., urged expatriates to take security steps, including varying routes to and from work and avoiding traffic bottlenecks. It follows the arrest Sept. 4 of three men in Germany suspected of planning “massive bomb attacks” on targets in Germany used by U.S. citizens.
“This is the first time I have seen the words `terrorist’ and `Nigeria’ from the U.S.” in a public warning, Sebastian Spio- Garbrah, an analyst at New York-based Eurasia Group, said by telephone. The notification “should really distinguish it from the normal militia threat in the Niger delta.”
Al-Qaeda has previously said it’s interested in Nigeria. The 140 million population of the country, Africa’s biggest oil producer, is about 50 percent Muslim. A February 2005 United Nations report said al-Qaeda established recruiting and training bases in northern Nigeria, where the majority of Muslims live.
“With Sept. 11 fast approaching, there’s great need for U.S. citizens to be more cautious,” said Rudy Stewart, a spokesman at the U.S. embassy in Abuja. Stewart said the statement was issued as a “prudent” measure.

Today’s notice refers specifically to a terrorist threat, rather than unrest in the Niger delta. Militants and criminal gangs in Nigeria’s oil-producing region have kidnapped more than 200 expatriates since the start of last year. Most were released unharmed in a few days or weeks.
“While Nigerian Muslims, like Kenyan and Tanzanian Muslims, are generally peaceful, the conditions exist in parts of Nigeria for foreign jihadists to use the legendary hospitality of their hosts to plan terrorist attacks,” Garbrah said.
The U.S. military has created a new African command, known as Africom, that’s due to begin operations next month to safeguard the region’s oil interests against rebel or terrorist attacks.

Posted by: b real | Sep 6 2007 18:45 utc | 34

Bwaahhhh – they put up 15 feet metal fences all around Sydney to protect Bush’s ass and then happens this:

Members of an Australian TV comedy show, one dressed as Osama bin Laden, drove through two security checkpoints Thursday before being stopped near the Sydney hotel where President Bush is staying.
The stunt embarrassed Sydney police who have imposed the tightest security measures in city history for a summit of leaders from Pacific Rim countries, including Bush.
Police arrested 11 cast and crew from the TV program, “The Chaser’s War on Everything,” and impounded three vehicles, the Australian Broadcasting Corp., which airs the show, said on its Web site.
Cast members put together a sham motorcade, hiring two motorcycles and three large cars on which they put Canadian flags. Police waved the motorcade through two checkpoints before pulling it over near the Intercontinental Hotel where Bush is staying.
Cast member Chas Licciardello got out of the car dressed in a white tunic and cap and wearing a long fake Osama bin Laden-style beard.

Posted by: b | Sep 6 2007 18:54 utc | 35

Unca Scam, at 27,
This blog does a fair job of covering the APA* / torture saga.
Last time I posted it some cia stooge or similar blasted me for linking to it. He had been at the last APA meeting! He knew the true spritit was not pro – but anti-torture. The details are too complicated.
link
Blog also treats other points, so one has to dig in. It is factual, opinion can be weeded out mentally.
*APA = American Psychologial Association, to be distinguished from the American Psychiatric Association (medicos) who have publicly come out against torture and so on.
I have never joined. And it cost me professionally. Big big time. That is how those systems work.

Posted by: Tangerine | Sep 6 2007 19:16 utc | 36

Haaretz on the bizarro midnight raid on Syria: The Question is, How Will Damascus Respond?

This could well be a one-off that will not develop into anything more, for the time being, but it does send shockwaves across the region. Every Arab media outlet is covering it intensely, simply because in the Mideast every incident can have unexpected consequences.
Syria, for its part, stressed from the first moment that the story broke that it is retaining the right to respond. The Syrian information minister further clarified that Damascus’ political and military leadership is weighing its reaction.
That Syrian response will determine considerably how the rest of the incident plays out. Since the end of the Second Lebanon War in August of last year, Syria has emphasized that it could well engage in “resistance” activities against Israel’s occupation of the Golan Heights.
In the lexicon of Arab diplomatic language, the term “moqawama” (resistance) means violent but legitimate activity against Israel. Even so, it seems that Syria will stick to the usual course of action, namely a request for condemnation of Israel by the United Nations Security Council.
Many questions remain unanswered regarding details of the incident, among them the exact number of IAF planes that entered Syrian airspace, and where exactly they were when they drew anti-aircraft fire. According to the Reuters news agency, witnesses saw four planes close to the Syrian-Turkish frontier, while a lone report on the Al-Arabiya satellite channel said that the IAF plane was attacked in the region of Qamishli, not far from the Iraqi border.
It’s also hard to figure out the point of the mission. Syrian analysts, however, say that the aim was to examine flight paths inside their country which the IAF could use without discovery by Syrian radar.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 6 2007 19:33 utc | 37

Syria Comment:

What is this about? One has to believe it is an intentional provocation. Way up north along the Euphrates River near Turkey. The plans headed from the Mediterranean along the border with Turkey and dipped into Syrian airspace, one is led to believe. Were they on the way to the Iraqi border region? The reports try to link it to Syrian support for Hamas, but it makes no sense for Israeli plans to penetrate Syria way up north. In 2004, Israel was accused of setting off car bombs in Damascus that were rigged to kill Hamas leaders. In 2006, Israeli planes buzz over the presidential residence in Latakia.
All summer, there has been speculation in the Israeli press about a summer war with Syria. Most recently, Defense Minister Barak poured cold water on such speculation. He said there was no provocation and decided to withdraw Israeli military troops away from the Golan border in order to calm the situation and quell speculation about a military conflict between the two countries. He also wanted to reduce the risk of an “accidental incident” setting off an unwanted conflict.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 6 2007 19:41 utc | 38

There ought to be clowns.
Heehee.

Posted by: beq | Sep 6 2007 19:42 utc | 39

Very interesting post today on Informed Comment that sheds light on why Bush decided to beam himself in to Anbar in particular as opposed to the green zone.

The point of the elaborately staged Anbar soundbite was not to tout the claimed (modest) success of the Surge–that has been done many multiple times in the briefings, the “dog and pony shows,” given to visiting congressmen, journalists, and analysts. Rather, it was to build up an alternative story of political success in response to the clear failure of political reconciliation among the contending parties in the Government of Iraq. It was only a few months ago that Congress and the Administration went clearly on record that the strategic point of the surge was to bring about such reconciliation, as defined by the benchmarks contained in our law. But not even the Administration, Petraeus or Crocker could claim that the political benchmarks have been met or that they are likely to be met in the foreseeable future. Rather than admit the obvious–that the Surge has been a failure because it has not and probably will not meet its strategic goals–the President and his men are now developing an alternative to the political goals set by Congress and the President three months ago. Rather than “top/down” political progress to be evidenced by meeting the stated benchmarks, what is really valuable is “bottom/up” progress, the kind that is represented by Sunni Sheiks cooperating with the US by taking our weapons to chase down largely other, radical Iraqis under the banner of al Qaeda of Mesopotamia. What we will hear next week, is testimony by Petraeus and Crocker, combined with a largely staged campaign of articles, backgrounders and op-ed pieces, that seek to redefine the political goalposts and conclude that they are being met through the newly identified “bottom-up” phenomenon.
But what really appears to be happening is that the US, for valid near term tactical military goals, is supporting local traditional political structures that are tribal, authoritarian and non-transparent to combat radical Sunnis associated with local al Qaeda affiliates. The sheiks are not democratic or elected. But they are certainly important. And they also, not surprisingly, have their own political agendas.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 6 2007 19:48 utc | 40

My collected works are available for the first time in print at Wolf DeVoon Lulu. Mostly theoretical stuff on liberty and the rule of law, addressed to future generations.
W.

Posted by: Wolf DeVoon | Sep 6 2007 20:41 utc | 41

@b #25 – The CBC did a special on the Iraq Oil For Food funds built up over the embargo years that amounted to 22 billion. By the time Bremer left and handed the remaining funds over to the Iraqi government there was only 3 – 1/2 billion left. Can’t remeber the name of it but it is still on their web site. The real irony was when Negroponte took over he emailed a request to the US asking for 3 – 1/2 billion to be taken from the 18 billion reconstruction fund for security and got it.

Posted by: Sam | Sep 6 2007 20:50 utc | 42

In other news,
Look who else was behind a much celebrated *spontaneous* popular pro-democracy uprising:
Berezovsky wants “orange revolution” money back from Ukraine

Boris Berezovsky, the fugitive Russian oligarch, is suing Ukrainian politicians for nearly $23 million he says he provided to fund the country’s 2004 “orange revolution,” Ukrainian justice authorities said Monday.
(snip)

And here is the latest flare up of a chronic concern:
Is China quietly dumping US Treasuries?

A sharp drop in foreign holdings of US Treasury bonds over the last five weeks has raised concerns that China is quietly withdrawing its funds from the United States, leaving the dollar increasingly vulnerable.

Posted by: Alamet | Sep 6 2007 23:05 utc | 43

berezovsky, mate of murdoch – what a small time hood

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 6 2007 23:09 utc | 44

Regarding yesterday’s LOOSE NUKES story!!! Important update!

“…some disturbing information buried in an unclassified USAF budget document. Below you will find some of the significant text and a link to the entire ultra-dull report from the Pentagon. But here are some bullet points to consider (tin foil optional):
— We were TOLD these weapons were being moved to be decomissioned. THAT IS NOT TRUE! This current USAF doc says the missiles are being ‘refitted’ to extend their service life until fiscal year 2030! These are state of the art weapons. The service plan even includes upgrading the W-80 warheads to keep them IN SERVICE.
— If you read the first sentence below, you will see how the USAF decribes these weapons as “designed to evade air and ground-based defenses in order to strike heavily defended, hardened targets at any location within any enemy’s territory.” Humm… What sort of operation would require such ordanance?
— We have only 38 of these weapons, so 5 of them is a large chunk of the inventory to move at once.
— It is MY OPINION that some ‘patriot’ leaked the info about these weapons movements. A warning?
— It is also my opinion these weapons were being moved for some other reason, to Barksdale, and then possibly on to Diego Garcia, for obvious reasons.”

Also, don’t miss:
Description/JustificationCommittee Staff Procurement Backup Book (pdf).FY 2008/2009 Budget Estimates

AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missile (ACM) is a low-observable air-launched strategic missile with significant improvements over the Air Launched Cruise Missile B version (ALCM-B) in range, accuracy and
survivability. Armed with a W-80 warhead, it is designed to evade air and ground-based defenses in order to strike heavily defended, hardened targets at any location within any enemy’s territory. The ACM is
designed for B-52H external carriage and there are currently 394 ACM in the inventory. The ACM fleet design service life expires between the years 2003 and 2008. A Service Life Extension Plan (SLEP) was
developed to meet an AF Long Range Plan requirement to extend ACM Service Life to FY30.
Range Commanders Council (RCC) test range safety requirements (RCC-319) and Department of Energy’s (DOE) redesign of the Joint Test Assembly (JTA) is driving modification of existing Joint Test
Instrumentation Kit (JTIK) test doors. Newly modified JTIK test doors will incorporate Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking capability and components removed from the redesigned JTA package.
Without modified JTIK doors, the ACM cannot maintain its DOE nuclear certification, support the W-80 warhead Life Extension Program (LEP) or conduct flight testing used to collect weapon system
reliability data.
The requirement exists to provide modified Test Instrumentation Kits (TIKs) to support Functional Ground Test (FGT). FGT will provide a critical capability to the Air Force and provide a means of testing the
ACM without the loss of an asset. These tests will provide important reliability data for Service Life Extension analysis. Kit modification and unique spare components will be procured to support tests in the
FGT facility.
Missile Breakdown: Active 38, Reserve 0, ANG 0, Total 38
UPDATE: Some reports today claim it was 6 missiles, but yesterday’s report claimed 5. FYI

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 7 2007 0:17 utc | 45

damn uncle, you’re on the ball as usual

Posted by: annie | Sep 7 2007 2:04 utc | 46

The two Germans, who plotted to attack US installations in Germany, puzzle the average American person quite a bit, I believe.
Combined with the fact that the NPD had more votes in Saxony than the SPD, the two white native born Germans (how US CNN expressed it), who were so inspired by Al-Queda hate that they felt compelled to convert to Islam, is unfathomable to most Americans. Who would have thought that young white German guys would be so hateful against the Americans as to support, train and plot with Al-Queda? That’s a question I heard over and over from Americans in my work environment.
These events bring out old suspicions and distrust to the forefront of their minds. Things they had buried in some dark subconscious back corners. Most Americans I talked to felt their opinions about the Germans confirmed: radical extremists, either sozi or nazis and now jihadist, that’s what they are. Good Lord, where are we getting ourselves into?
I had the feeling that they almost were sad that the Germans actually caught those guys and had to admit that the Germans did a pretty good surveillance job. That almost makes them a bit jealous of our police and intelligence forces.
Now I wonder how good the cooperation between US and German security forces really are. I was kind of proud, when I heard they had them under surveillance for six month and caught them right on time. At least that part was “a job well done”.
I just hope everybody keeps cool heads here.
It would be good, if Germans wouldn’t generalize their political criticism vis a vis the Bush government as to sound like American bashers and haters and would confirm ever so often that one doesn’t hate Americans.
It’s much too easy (and cheap, IMO) to just bash the US. There is quite an arrogance beaming out from many Germans in the US, who think they know “why America doesn’t work” and aren’t shy to “say what they think”, even when they haven’t been asked.
I don’t think that the average German knows how sensitive American civilians are and how much they dislike some aspects of German behavior. They find us as least as arrogant and pompous as Germans think Americans are bullies and show offs.
It’s needed to take a step back and take a look at oneself from time to time.

Posted by: mimi | Sep 7 2007 2:06 utc | 47

Is China quietly dumping US Treasuries?
that would certainly nip things in the bud. bring it on baby.

Posted by: annie | Sep 7 2007 2:13 utc | 48

@ beq 39
then these should be clowns too .
But they aren’t. Both aren’t. Don’t you think? Look here . Extremist supremacist and Nazi groups have increased quite dramatically in the last six years. They are in the midst of us over in Germany and over here.

Posted by: mimi | Sep 7 2007 2:17 utc | 49

It’s needed to take a step back and take a look at oneself from time to time.

Posted by: annie | Sep 7 2007 2:19 utc | 50

U.S. Arms Exports and Military Assistance in the “Global War on Terror”

Six years after the Sept. 11 attacks, little has changed in the Bush administration’s strategy with regard to U.S. arms exports. The Bush administration is still supplying high technology weapons and millions of dollars in military assistance to allies in the “war on terror.” Support for the United States – either in its quest to stamp out international terrorist networks, or for its operations in Iraq and Afghanistan – seemingly takes precedence over other criteria usually taken into account when the United States considers an arms transfer.
According to long-standing tenets of U.S. arms export policy, arms transfers should not undermine long-term security and stability, weaken democratic movements, support military coups, escalate arms races, exacerbate ongoing conflicts, cause arms build-ups in unstable regions, or be used to commit human rights abuses. However, in the last six years, the Bush administration has demonstrated a willingness to provide weapons and military training to weak and failing states and countries that have been repeatedly criticized by the U.S. State Department for human rights violations, lack of democracy, and even support of terrorism.
Since 2001, CDI has sought to thoroughly evaluate and analyze this trend of increased military assistance. Over the last six years, CDI has profiled 25 countries that have a unique role in the “war on terror” through the strategic services they have provided to the United States as it conducts anti-terror operations across the globe.

CDI’s ongoing research continues to document some troubling trends. Using U.S. government data, CDI has documented that, in the five years after Sept. 11, total U.S. arms sales (Foreign Military Sales and Direct Commercial Sales ) to these 25 countries were worth four times more than those concluded in the five years prior to Sept. 11, and these countries received 18 times more total U.S. military assistance (Foreign Military Financing and International Military Education and Training) after Sept. 11 than before. Furthermore, 72 percent of the countries in this series received more military assistance and 64 percent conducted more arms sales with the United States during the five years after Sept. 11 than during the entire period between the end of the Cold War and Sept. 11 (FY 90-01).

Just as the United States is using arms sales as a reward to its allies in the “war on terror,” military assistance programs have also increased since Sept. 11.

In 2006, the U.S. State Department reported that “serious,” “grave,” or “significant” abuses were committed by the government or state security forces in more than half of these 25 countries. However, U.S. military assistance to these countries is on the rise, even as their human rights situations remain poor and, in some cases, have become worse.

Posted by: b real | Sep 7 2007 2:36 utc | 51

Three important articles on Grand Imperial Strategy, Middle Powers, and resistance in South America:
Ecuador and the Struggle for Latin American Unity – I really learned a lot from this article.
Ecuador on the Cusp – Petras follows with data.
Life in a FARC camp – Interesting article and good website.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 7 2007 3:01 utc | 52

#49
The Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) list of hate groups includes the KKK, racist skinheads, NeoNazi’s, Aryan nationalist groups …
And it also includes chapters of the Nation of Islam & the Jewish Defence League.
Both the NOI & JDL have gone over the top at times. But this ranking suggests that either the KKK has gone soft (i.e they’re donating to the NAACP scholarship fund) or the JDL & NOI have been very bad lately.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Sep 7 2007 3:12 utc | 53

english, as a language, has official status in more than 75 countries. (source: stephen burman, the state of the american empire: how the usa shapes the world, univ. of california press, 2007, p. 104)
Cameroon: U.S. Embassy to Promote English

The US Embassy in Cameroon has stepped up efforts to promote the English language in the country.
This is in line with one of the goals of the US State Department to promote English language throughout the world. One of the major activities that the US Embassy is embarking on to attain that objective is to organise a teacher development program.
This has to do with organising or supporting the organisation of seminars and workshops among others, for the enhancement of the knowledge of English language teachers in different parts of the country.

a brief historical refresher:

In August 1492, Elio Antonio de Nebrija, the bisop of Avila, set into motion the “most massive act of genocide in the history of the world.” Yet Nebrija commanded no armies. He was neither a politician nor a military strategist. He was neither financier nor mercenary. He was a linguist and a scholar at the University of Salamanca, in what later would become Spain. Nebrija’s actions on that hot summer day, just fifteen days after Columbus set sail for Palos on his way to find a new route to Asia, were quite deliberate and would change the world forever. For indigenous peoples around the globe, Nebrija began a nightmare, the final extent of which has yet to be realized.
When Nebrija entered the royal court on 18 August, he held in his hands the freshly printed first edition of his Gramatica Castellana, the first grammar and semantic road map for Christian Europeans intent on colonization. In the introduction to his Gramatica, Nebrija informed Queen Isabella of the importance of his new invention: “Language has always been the consort of empire, and forever shall remain its mate. Together they come into being, together they grow and flower.”
When the noted scholar presented the queen with the book, she is reported to have asked quite pointedly, “What is this good for?” Nebrija, with the foresight of an expansionistic clairvoyant, is reported to have replied, “Your Majesty, language is the perfect instrument of empire.”
— glenn t. morris, vine deloria, jr., and the development of a decolonizing critique of indigenous peoples and internation relations, in the volume native voices: american indentity and resistance, univ. press of kansas, 2003, p. 103

Posted by: b real | Sep 7 2007 4:03 utc | 54

I don’t know what to make of these groups, I just know their appeal isn’t restricted to their own membership… Documentary looks at Nazi porn in Israel

JERUSALEM, Sept. 6 (UPI) — A new documentary explores the cultural significance of Nazi-themed pornographic pocket books in Israel, The New York Times said Thursday.
Called Stalags after the World War II prisoner-of-war camps in which they were set, the volumes first became popular amongst young Israelis in the 1960s.
The books were the only form of pornography available and told sexually charged tales of captured U.S. or British pilots abused by female SS officers.
The plots frequently concluded with the male characters exacting revenge on their tormentors by raping and killing them.
An Israeli court found the publishers guilty of disseminating pornography and the books went out of print and underground just a couple of years after they first appeared.
Ari Libsker’s new documentary, “Stalags: Holocaust and Pornography in Israel,” looks at this distinct genre, which was created by Israeli publishers and penned by Israeli authors.
Libsker’s film also features an interview with the publisher of the first Stalag who admitted gory details disclosed at the 1961 trial of high-ranking Nazi Adolf Eichmann added to the genre’s momentum.
Until the trial, the voices of the Holocaust had hardly been heard in Israel, the Times said.

When I was a teenager, there were always little posses of my peers getting together for long road trips to kick the asses of the “Satanists” we’d heard were active in some rural enclave or t’other (there were “terrorists” in those days, but they didn’t get the kind of press they do now and they really didn’t appeal to us on the same level). I figured out early on that it was a combination of identity reinforcement and a way to relieve the boredom, but the trips were scenic even if they invariably ended with disappointment that the boogiemen didn’t show themselves. This was during the Cold War and I recognised the same thrill in my elders when they were chasing largely imaginary Communist plots that we teenagers experienced when we were chasing away our imaginary “Satanists”.
A sense of identity or tribalism apparently needs an object to tangibly contrast itself with (how many people would contribute to this site if there were no American empire or Republican party?). This can be both thrilling and, if one can believe the above article, arousing. I don’t get it, but there it is. There’s an intricate dance of mutually reinforcing hate going on that guarantees that these groups such as these will be “on the rise”… even if they don’t call us the next day like they promised.

Posted by: Monolycus | Sep 7 2007 4:07 utc | 55

A small word of caution about a group that does much good:
From the SPLC’s website, Black Separatist Hate Groups page:
Black separatists typically oppose integration and racial intermarriage, and they want separate institutions — or even a separate nation — for blacks. Most forms of black separatism (or black nationalism) are strongly anti-white and anti-Semitic, and a number of religious versions assert that blacks — not Jews — are the Biblical “chosen people” of God.
Although the Southern Poverty Law Center recognizes that much black racism in America is, at least in part, a response to centuries of white racism, it believes racism must be exposed in all its forms. White groups espousing beliefs similar to black separatists would be considered clearly racist. The same criteria should be applied to all groups regardless of their color.

So let’s get this right: Because the Jews believe that they are God’s “chosen” people, it is a hate crime for another religious group to believe that THEY are God’s chosen people. They are not allowed to feel special; only the Jews are. I imagine that if a Jewish scientist had discovered proof of the Jew’s “chosen” status that I would have read about it in the NYTimes. Otherwise this smacks of state religion to me. In any event, as I have mentioned before, this is a serious mis-reading of what the term “chosen” means in this sense — It means chosen by God to fulfill the 613 Laws found in the Torah, not chosen as superior in any way.
There are over 1/2 Million Orthodox Jews in the US. By and large, they oppose racial intermarriage and not only want, but have and attend, separate institutions. As far as wanting a separate nation for the Jews, those people are called Zionists, and not only do most Jews adhere to this belief, they actually have secured that separate nation, and have loyal adherents of their belief placed in the highest reaches of US government. Opinion polls have shown the overwhelming majority of those who hold Zionist viewpoints to be strongly anti-Arab and anti-Muslim, clearly a hate crime.
And yet, despite the amazing number of Jews who subscribe to these hateful beliefs, there is no category for Jewish Separatist hate groups.
What’s good for the goose should be good for the gander; What’s good for the decendants of Ham should also be good for those who don’t eat Ham.
The SPLC seems to have no problem equating the responses of the repressed with the precipitating actions of the oppressor.
By the way, the book “Boychicks in the ‘Hood,” an exploration of the various Hasidic sects in the US, shows an extraordinary amount of Jew-on Jew hate crimes and gang violence, all apparently overlooked by the SPLC.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 7 2007 4:10 utc | 56

@ b real #54:
Aaaak! Could it be Cultural Hegemony rearing its ubiquitous head?
@ Malooga Monolycus #55:
Many oppressed people lust after their oppressors — perversely, it is a way of objectifying them. You’ve heard of the Stockholm syndrome. This is the stocking syndrome. Remember Wertmuller’s “Seven Beauties?”

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 7 2007 4:21 utc | 57

This is so transparent as to be ludicrously comical:
Bin Laden plans video on 9/11
Sheesh.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 7 2007 4:24 utc | 58

@mimi – the recent plots in Germany
There is very much unclear there. Those people were under surveilance for at least 6 month. It’s yet not public where they bought 500 liters of hydrogen peroxid, but you don’t get that much in the neighborhood pharmacy. The police exchanged that stuff to a harmless lower concentration without their knowledge. Whoever sold the stuff to them, it was certainly with the knowledge of relevant authorities.
The guy’s didn’t had attack plans. The interior minister first talked of Frankfurt airport, but had to take that back. They didn’t had ANY concrete plan. One one them once did drive around a U.S. air base. That’s all that’s known.
The hadn’t mixed any explosives yet. They were experiementing in small scale (TAP, the explosive, is not simple to make.)
Why did the police blow the arrest? Why arrest now at all? They are saying they are still searching for 10 people. Who? Why? After 6 month of surveilance why didn’t they catch’em all at once?
Mayn questions, but on a second view this is less than was propagated in the first news conferences. One wonders how much was provoked by the police …

Posted by: b | Sep 7 2007 4:43 utc | 59

@ b 59
They had no concrete attack plans?
Then I have to try to read more German news on that then.
Very confusing.
I just wanted to mention the first reactions I had from Americans, which showed me just how deep the division between Germans and Americans have become.
You sound as if something was possibly staged? Everything feels so hysterical over here at this side of the pond, I have difficulties with the little time I have to read to come to some kind of reasonable conclusions.

Posted by: mimi | Sep 7 2007 5:04 utc | 60

Malooga#57
many good points there

Posted by: anna missed | Sep 7 2007 5:18 utc | 61

upstream in #34 i linked to a bloomberg piece on the u.s. embassy in abuja, nigeria issuing a warning of “terror” threat to u.s. interests in that nation.
of the two or three additional stories i see on this tonite, there are now stmts being inserted by an unnamed u.s. official that

has played down the embassy warning saying the advisory was based on “very non-specific threat information.”
“I’d steer you away from the idea that this was some major terror plot and I’d kind of point you more in the direction of things associated with Nigerian local kinds of actions,” said the US State Department official, who asked not to be identified.
“No one should think that this means that Osama bin Laden is planning a major attack in Nigeria,” the official said from Washington.
“That’s not the level of what we are talking about. Local organisations, as far as I understand it, is the nature of the threat,” he added.
“This was described to me as one of these things where they had some very non-specific threat information.” [link]

consider the following as a possible motive for the “non-specific” terror threat in nigeria:
OPEC is meeting in vienna on 11 sept. there have been stories over the past week or so, quoting various OPEC representatives stating that the cartel would not be increasing output at the upcoming meeting.
for instance, see this past tuesday’s african oil journal: OPEC Will Not Increase Production at the Next Meeting on Sept 11

Qatar’s energy minister on Tuesday declared that there were no plans to increase crude oil production at next week’s OPEC meeting in Vienna as the 12-nation cartel sees no shortages in the market.
“There will be no increase in production as supply and demand are in balance and the market is not suffering from any shortages,” Abdullah bin Hamad al-Attiyah said at the sidelines of a conference on gas in Doha.
When asked about calls for the oil cartel to boost output, Attiyah said that OPEC had to be cautious before taking that step.
“In our contacts with clients, we have not seen increased pressure or need in the market,” added Attiyah, who is also Qatar’s deputy prime minister.

there have been calls for OPEC to boost production quotas to ease problems stemming from reports alleging inventory reserve shortages, ‘threatening’ price increases, concerns over the affects of hurricane season, and world economy imbalances stemming from u.s. financial market woes. but OPEC appears to be standing firm & many analysts don’t think they’ll budge.
after the announcement yesterday of the “terror” threat to production & distribution facilities in the niger delta, crude prices have increased.
Oil climbs on Mid-East tension, US inventory falls

US crude gains 18 cents to $76.48 a barrel, Brent up 3 cents to $74.80 on Israel-Syria tension and fears of terror attacks on US installations in Africa.

Crude inventories in top consumer the US fell by a higher-than-expected 3.9 million barrels last week, as refiners boosted runs, government data showed on Thursday. Gasoline stocks sank 1.5 million barrels to the lowest level in two years, following a series of outages in the ageing US refining system.
“It is still a bull trend with major concerns about US oil stock levels, though there are concerns over the US economy slowing. There may be profit-taking when prices hit $78 a barrel,” said Gerard Rigby from Fuel First Consulting in Sydney. Adding to supply worries was tension in the Middle East, the source of nearly a third of world oil, after Syria accused Israel of bombing its territory on Thursday and warned it could respond.
Further support came from the US embassy in Nigeria warning US and other Western interests in Africa’s top oil producer are at risk of “terrorist attack”. US prices have climbed 3.3% this week to near the record high of $78.77 hit on 1 August.
The near-record prices are sending a message to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) that the world market is very tight, the new head of the International Energy Agency told Reuters on Thursday.

so could this warning from the u.s. embassy in abuja be part of a tactic to help push the price of crude up so high that it puts more pressure on OPEC to increase quotas next tuesday?
or is it a ploy to push up the price in order to grab a lot of quick profits? (perhaps of which some of that $$$ is needed to help stabilize the troubled financiers requiring bailout in the us? or finance energy sector adventures in central asia or elsewhere?)
or is it part of a campaign to justify an increased u.s. military presence in the delta? the “year-long trial deployment of a U.S. navy vessel to the region in October” is just around the corner, after all. and oil production there has been impacted for a year-and-a-half now from the unrest & insurrections.
or has there actually been a legit threat from one of the militant groups or gangs warning specifically of the targeting of u.s. installations? definitely not enough info in the few news copies on the warning right now to determine how serious to take it, although the stuff like the former u.s. ambassador to nigeria’s story — in the first link above — about AQ finding haven in nigeria can be dismissed out of hand for the baloney that it is.
which reduces the credibility of threat itself, if the embassy is indeed pushing AQ ties to the delta, leading me to wonder about a connection to the OPEC meeting this tuesday.

Posted by: b real | Sep 7 2007 5:25 utc | 62

@mimi – 60 – first let me recommend to you Telepolis, a small but serious German online magazine with some alternative views.
Their first take on the incident was this. More open questions from the conservative mainstream FAZ.
The folks did know they were unter surveillance, their houses had been searched. Why did they continue?
As for the NPD, i.e. Nazis. In the 60s they were in at least half of the state parliaments. Now they are on the fringes but sometimes protest voters give them votes to, well, protest against the mainstream parties. Usually they get kicked out again after one parlamentarian period.
Any NPD/Nazi protest/demonstration I have witnessed did draw a counterprotest croud at least three times as big. They are closely watched by the authorities. Some local NPD committees have been known (and proven) to include more police informants than genuine NPD folks. That makes it sometimes hard to know who really drives their action …

Posted by: b | Sep 7 2007 6:10 utc | 63

Alamet’s link @ 43:
Is China quietly dumping US Treasuries?
A sharp drop in foreign holdings of US Treasury bonds over the last five weeks has raised concerns that China is quietly withdrawing its funds from the United States, leaving the dollar increasingly vulnerable.

From the same article:
Robin Bhar, a metals analyst at UBS, said there was little evidence yet that Asian central banks were switching heavily into gold. Most of the recent buying of gold has been on the COMEX futures markets, the playground of hedge funds.
Central banks tend to buy their bullion in London at the AM and PM fixings, leaving a footprint that is visible to experts. They seem to have been largely absent from the market so far.

The Robber Barons are moving away from the disaster they have created and are buying gold. But it is really a secret plot eminating out of China. Got that?

Posted by: Sam | Sep 7 2007 6:41 utc | 64

@ b 63
thank you, b, especially for the telepolis link. With the Neo-Nazis, NPD etc. I theoretically know what you said. It’s a fact that when living overseas and looking back at Germany one starts to see Germany with the eyes of a foreigner, and they can’t put the Neo-Nazis and racism in Germany into the same context as Germans do.
So, for example, Africans seem to think that German racism against blacks and foreigners is much worse than American racism against same ethnicities. Whereas Afro-Americans tell me that they find African’s racism more irritating than German racism against blacks. So, usually I get dizzy when it comes to evaluate Neo-Nazis etc.

Posted by: mimi | Sep 7 2007 7:07 utc | 65

The CIA/Mossad Al Qaida announces: Bin Laden Plans Video on 9/11

Osama bin Laden will release a new video in the coming days ahead of the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks in what would be the first new images of the terror mastermind in nearly three years, al-Qaida’s media arm announced Thursday.
The White House said any new video from bin Laden would serve to highlight threats the West faces.

One difference in his appearance was immediately obvious. The announcement had a still photo from the coming video, showing bin Laden addressing the camera, his beard fully black. In his past videos, bin Laden’s beard was almost entirely gray with dark streaks.
Bin Laden’s beard appears to have been dyed, a popular practice among Arab leaders, said Rita Katz, director of the SITE Institute, a Washington-based group that monitors terror messages.
“I think it works for their (al-Qaida’s) benefit that he looks young, he looks healthy,” Katz said.

IntelCenter, which monitors Islamic Web sites and analyzes terror threats, said the video was expected within the next 72 hours, before the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 suicide hijacker attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

On IntelCenter and Mrs Katz see Where do messages from OBL, Zawahri come from?

“Before founding the SITE Institute in 2002, Ms. Katz served as Research Director of the Investigative Project in Washington, DC. Born in Iraq and a graduate of the Middle Eastern Studies program at Tel Aviv University, Katz speaks both Arabic and Hebrew with native fluency.”

Posted by: b | Sep 7 2007 7:44 utc | 66

continueing on b’s #33 post, Reuters has an article with both the denials by the Fed and actually what they did:
But Fed policy-makers were clear to state that the central bank was not in the business to bail out
investors who took risks.
snip
But Fed policy-makers were clear to state that the central bank was not in the business to bail out
investors who took risks.
snip
The Fed injected $31.25 billion in temporary reserves to the banking system via system repurchase
agreements while earlier the European Central Bank added 42.245 billion euros ($57.4 billion) in temporary overnight funds to ease tension in the euro interbank lending market.

Credit turmoil has raised risks to economy: Fed

Posted by: Sam | Sep 7 2007 8:07 utc | 67

Turning to Afghanistan:
OTTAWA (Reuters) – NATO operations in Afghanistan are being hampered by a shortage of troops and the
alliance is continually pressing member nations to live up to their commitments, a senior NATO official
said on Thursday.

Troop shortfalls hurt Afghan mission, says NATO
I’ve read tons of these articles and they give the impression that countries are refusing to go after Al Queda? In my mind this is inconcievable as I think their is no such thing as a NATO country that does not want to go after Al Queda. Personally I think think this refusal to get tangled up in Afghanistan stems from US efforts to turn this into a crusade against Islam. Everything they are doing gives this impression from starving Palestinians, supporting the bombing of Lebenon, invading Iraq, threatening Iran and Syria, taking part in the invasion of Somalia etc.
When you have Bush himself throwing around terms like axis of evil, crusade, bring them on and islamofascism it is no wonder. On the topic of Afghanistan here is a very interesting article regarding bin Laden and Afghanistan:
Secret Afghan Envoy Tells All

Posted by: Sam | Sep 7 2007 8:26 utc | 68

I think Bush still thinks of himself as “I’m the war President”:
The tense moments with Roh came as the leaders each made statements to reporters after their meeting. Roh concluded his by questioning why Bush hadn’t mention the issue of the war’s end.
“I might be wrong. I think I did not hear President Bush mention a declaration to end the Korean War just now,” Roh said through an interpreter. “Did you say so, President Bush?”
“It’s up to Kim Jong Il,” Bush said.

Bush, SKorea Leader Spar Over Korean War
What else would you expect from someone that goes to Australia and proclaims he is kicking ass in Iraq?

Posted by: Sam | Sep 7 2007 9:06 utc | 69

Tell us again how safe Anbar is now:
Four U.S. Marines were killed in fighting in Anbar province
7 Americans Killed in Iraq Attacks

Posted by: Sam | Sep 7 2007 9:07 utc | 70

sam , they have rewritten the article to make bush sound more sane. after copying this segment i went back to find another amusing part of the exchange and this had already been scrubbed along w/a rewrite of what you copied.
Roh pressed on. “If you could be a little bit clearer,” he said, prompting nervous laughter from the U.S. delegation and a look of annoyance from Bush.
that was cut out as was this ““It’s up to Kim Jong Il,” Bush said.”
they are probably busy editing the video for our consumption.

Posted by: annie | Sep 7 2007 10:56 utc | 71

b. this ms katz has an interesting past. evidently her father was hung in the town square by saddam. she is an independent self styled terrorist trapper! i’ll see if i can find the article i read about her a while back. SITE is not to be trusted. o wait, i think i remember. the weekly standard circa 6/07(that bastion of truth)claimed that the baath party (w/al douri supposedly in attendance)had a “heros meeting” was aligned w/al queada where they swore alliance. this was intercepted by SITE (who else) listening in on some yemen terrorist message board!
i found this out last recently following claims by some rabid rightwinger that the baath and al q were joined at the hip until we graced them w/our superior diplomacy in anbar.

Posted by: annie | Sep 7 2007 11:23 utc | 72

SITE is so creative
. . . The Mujahideen had made preparations to greet them until it was possible to bring them together with Zarqawi, and the “Heroes’ meeting” took place . . . In an atmosphere full of enthusiasm and high spirits for everybody, with the company of his three sons and a number of Mujahideen, Izzat Ibrahim Al Douri took off to meet with Abu Mussab Al Zarqawi. At their arrival, the Mujahideen greeted them amidst calls of “Allah Akbar” (3 times) [God is Greater]. Then the sound of gunfire was heard as Zarqawi rushed out, surrounded by the Mujahideen, covered by the dust of their blessed journey,” according to the network. It added that, at the sight of Zarqawi, Izzat Ibrahim shouted: “You are the commander and we are your soldiers.” His son Ahmad handed him a copy of the Quran. His father took it, placed his hand and the hands of his sons on it, and they made an oath to God, pledging allegiance to Zarqawi in the Jihad until victory or martyrdom, in good and bad times.”

Posted by: annie | Sep 7 2007 11:27 utc | 73

here’s a new yorker piece on the site institute
Private Jihad
How Rita Katz got into the spying business.
…..
“Some people think that she’s a zealot,” Stern said when I asked her about Katz, “but only a zealot would provide this kind of service.”

she has a fascinating biography, her father was excecuted by saddam as being a spy for israel.. the article refers to her as one of a group of self-styled spies who relied on the floods of “open source” information available online.

Posted by: annie | Sep 7 2007 11:46 utc | 74

Rue89 has an interesting story on the man that planted the bomb Iran story in the Sunday Times:
Just last Sunday, he was featured on the front the front page of the British Sunday Times, which reported
about one of his recent scoops: according to Debat, the Pentagon has drawn up plans for massive
airstrikes against Iran, designed to annihilate the Iranians’ military capability in three days. He
writes that these plans involve the use of so much force, that they are unlikely to ever be used.
But among certain circles in Washington, Debat has developed a reputation for making up stories.

A fake interview with Barack Obama
Planting bomb Iran stories, nukes mysteriously shipped to the US war staging base, and as annie points out in 71, editing news articles is just par for the course for this crew.

Posted by: Sam | Sep 7 2007 12:06 utc | 75

…making stuff up:
Betrayus for President?

Posted by: beq | Sep 7 2007 12:11 utc | 76

Some Iraq developments:
The Shiites were also the least likely to strongly agree that Iraq would be a better place if religion and politics were separated, the series of surveys shows. Specifically, 53 percent of the Sunnis, 68 percent of the Kurds, and 22 percent of the Shiites strongly agreed that Iraq would be a better place if religion and politics were separated, according to the July 2007 survey.
Secular, nationalist surge in Iraq continues
The open letter of the Association of Muslim Scholars of Iraq (AMSI) to the Iraqi resistance, to which the indefatigable Marc Lynch draws everyone’s attention, includes this passage that I think illustrates better than anything where they see themselves in the history of Iraq
a resistance-wide agreement on political aims

Posted by: Sam | Sep 7 2007 12:17 utc | 77

The number of U.S. troops in Iraq has climbed to a record high of 168,000, and is moving toward a peak of 172,000 in the coming weeks — a level that could extend into December, a senior military official said Thursday.
Combined with the 180K or so mercenaries, I’d say we are approaching Vietnam territory.
And now the US is threatening to turn Afghanistan into Colombia by spraying herbicide on the pretty little poppies. Can we say chemical warfare, anyone?
By perfecting weapons that kill slowly instead of quickly, the Evil Empire literally gets away with murder. The death rate increase in any place the US shows its ugly little face is clear evidence of its intent to kill, kill, kill.
What the US is doing is really far more insidious and heinous than what the Nazis did, who at least had the courage to kill their victims directly. And all the Holocaust museums in the world won’t bury the crimes of this gang of thugs.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 7 2007 13:46 utc | 78

It should be understood by everyone here as axiomatic that any so-called terrorist plots uncovered in the US or Europe and trumpeted in the press are fake and meant to scare people and manipulate their minds and buy off their “free” votes.
Any real threat to Empire is covered up and never heard about.
Where is freedom, the freedom to make up one’s own mind, when the media are owned by bloodthirsty lying criminal thugs, and we are treated to their ravings for more plunder 24/7?
Any real threat to Empire is covered up and never heard about. As with the legitimate resistance in Iraq. Remember that.
We live in a Bizarro world and we should never forget it.
Terrorists and “axis’s of evil” are not threats to the Empire. An informed citizenry demanding its needs are met, is.
Terrorism is yeast to the beer of warfare. Peace is poison to the Empire. War is the health of the state.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 7 2007 13:55 utc | 79

i’m with malooga on that

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 7 2007 14:06 utc | 80

@Malooga
When you last wrote “War is the health of the state” in response to a post on Lebanon, I did not fully understand it. Now, in light of this latest comment you’ve made (#79), I think I get it. Am I correct in understanding that you mean that the defense industry has so taken control of the US (and Israel, and other countries) that only a state of war is considered a state of collective health and well-being? In other words, that constant war has become the raison d’etre of the state? It makes perfect sense to me, I just did not understand it before, perhaps because of the way you phrased it.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 7 2007 14:10 utc | 81

terrorism is a tactic that primarily relies on psychological impact. just as the cia et al are/have perfecting/ed torture in the psychological realm, rather than the physical, terrorism is being refined to the point that it no longer needs much in the way of material deed. the battlefield is in played out in people’s heads.
the “war on terror” can be seen as just that — a perpetual war economy made possible by psychologically terrorizing the population into supporting the national security apparatus & its doctrines — unilateral, preemptive aggression for expansionistic imperial policies driven by energy security & leveling the playing field to ensure a global market economy infrastructure ordered to u.s. elite interests.

Posted by: b real | Sep 7 2007 14:38 utc | 82

Ain’t Republican democracy grand:
In addition, Fox agreed to let the New Hampshire Republican Party charge a fee for tickets to this less than stellar event, something that has not been done at any other venue in the state that sponsored a candidate event or debate.
GOP debate

Posted by: Sam | Sep 7 2007 14:48 utc | 83

Some well written economic humor:
Clowns included!

Posted by: biklett | Sep 7 2007 17:46 utc | 84

Froomkin:

In December, after a Republican electoral rout and a devastating report from the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, the debate shifted briefly to how — not when — to withdraw. But then Bush announced his surge of troops — and asked the press and the public to give it time. In May, it seemed like September would be a decisive deadline, with some Republicans agreeing that, barring significant political progress in Iraq, they would join Democrats in demanding withdrawal.
Now, however, the big news is that Bush’s commander in Iraq, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, is willing to contemplate a possible drawdown of one brigade early next year — if the circumstances are right. That’s one combat brigade out of the five that make up the surge; one out of 20 such brigades in country in total; or less than 5,000 of the 168,000 troops currently in Iraq.
And this is the plan despite the fact that a majority of the U.S. public, according to the polls, favors an immediate or gradual withdrawal of all troops from Iraq — and has for well over a year.

Astonishing, but without an opposition party …

Posted by: b | Sep 7 2007 17:57 utc | 85

The crazies – exclusive excerpts from The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush Administration by Jack L. Goldsmith. Goldsmith served as head of the Office of Legal Counsel from October 2003 to July of 2004.
The Terror Presidency

Addington once expressed his general attitude toward accommodation when he said, “We’re going to push and push and push until some larger force makes us stop.” He and, I presumed, his boss viewed power as the absence of constraint. These men believed that the president would be best equipped to identify and defeat the uncertain, shifting, and lethal new enemy by eliminating all hurdles to the exercise of his power. They had no sense of trading constraint for power. It seemed never to occur to them that it might be possible to increase the president’s strength and effectiveness by accepting small limits on his prerogatives in order to secure more significant support from Congress, the courts, or allies. They believed cooperation and compromise signaled weakness and emboldened the enemies of America and the executive branch. When it came to terrorism, they viewed every encounter outside the innermost core of most trusted advisers as a zero-sum game that if they didn’t win they would necessarily lose.

Posted by: b | Sep 7 2007 18:25 utc | 86

well stated b real 82, i’m stealing that for another forum. very succinct.

Posted by: annie | Sep 7 2007 18:59 utc | 87

ditto that for 79, sorry i’m reading bottom to top, yep. war is the health of the state alright.

Posted by: annie | Sep 7 2007 19:12 utc | 88

on al jazeeras tap of bin laden he looks more like groucho marx or my uncle lev. his beard comes from the same place where john bolton buys his toupées

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 7 2007 19:43 utc | 89

ô it is utterly ridiculous & reaches a new low in cia production values
if that is bin laden then i am alexander the great
& whoever it is speaks in the same tongue as the other cretins on international news – perhaps he could get a job on sky or some other sordid piece of shit telegraphing these old tales

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 7 2007 20:00 utc | 90

in the last open thread i pointed out that the u.n. team visit to the ogaden region of ethiopia was widely expected to not be an independent investigation, rather that they would be chaperoned by the ethiopian regime to select spots in order to avoid interrupting the govts scorched-earth counterinsurgency operations in the area.
that view now seems to be correct.
from a reuters’ story last night
U.N. team returns from Ethiopia’s troubled Ogaden

ADDIS ABABA, Sept 6 (Reuters) – U.N. aid officials and human rights investigators ended a week-long mission to Ethiopia’s troubled Ogaden region on Thursday and said they would present their findings to the government next week.
The mission primarily assessed the food, water and health needs in the remote area, said Paul Hebert, head of the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in Ethiopia.
“Considering this was not an investigative mission, we gathered enough information to enable us to draw preliminary conclusions on the humanitarian situation in the region and on protection issues,” Hebert told Reuters.
“The government facilitation was good,” he said, adding that the mission would brief the Ethiopian authorities next week before reporting to donors and non-governmental organisations.

ogaden online: UN Engaged in a Face Saving Exercise

Reports reaching our service desk from our reporters throughout Ogaden and highly placed sources within the United Nations offices in Addis Ababa confirm that the recently concluded UN mission in Ogaden was nothing more than a UN- Ethiopian face saving exercise.
The highly placed sources within the UN office in Addis Ababa, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the information they have provided, indicate that the mission was not meant to investigate the atrocities that have taken place in Ogaden.
The short nature of the UN visit in Ogaden as well as the limited towns and cities such as Dhagax Buur and Sheygosh that the UN was allowed to visit they, sources, argue is an indication of the extent of the face saving exercises that the UN office in Ethiopia has engaged.
These sources add that Doctors Without Borders, MSF, become aware of the fact that the UN mission was not going to visit areas such as Wardheer zone, Fiiq, and the outlaying areas of Qabri Dahar where most of the atrocities have been reported to have taken place.
It is the fact that the UN was not going to visit these areas that compelled MSF to go public with the information of the atrocities its staff have witnessed in these areas as well as the importance of having the UN mission to visit these areas where the most horrific crimes have taken place to date.

Our reporters throughout Ogaden have also confirmed that the UN mission was not allowed to tour the areas where they have visited with helicopters but were escorted in land. Many of the people the UN was allowed to meet with are said to have either been prearranged or some of the names the UN mission had were refused to be produced with flimsy excuses.
Both the highly placed sources within the UN office in Addis Ababa as well as our reporters throughout Ogaden agree that this short UN mission in Ogaden was meant to first show the global community that Ethiopia is not restricting the UN since it has allowed the UN office itself to visit Ogaden.
Second they agree that the objective of the visit and the findings to be published shortly after Ethiopia is first given access to the final report are meant to show the need for an urgent humanitarian need in Ogaden without either articulating who has allowed the situation to develop in the first place or mentioning any of the atrocities that have been widely reported to have taken place in many parts of Ogaden. In the end, the sources add the UN mission will be promised greater access to the worst hit zones in Ogaden while Ethiopia demand that UN agencies refrain from publishing or talking about any of the atrocities that many eyewitnesses and observers have described as nothing short of a war crimes.

also see
slate: Why We Don’t Hear About the Conflict in the Ogaden
When an American reporter started digging, he was forced out of Ethiopia.
one thing about that guy’s story though, he writes ” In April, an Ogadeni rebel group attacked a Chinese-run oil field and killed more than 70 Chinese and Ethiopian workers,” which is misleading b/c, while the casuality count was indeed over 70, most credible accounts agree that only nine chinese were killed in the attack. the rest were ethiopian security forces & oil workers who had been repeatedly warned that the people of ogaden would not accept the ethiopian govt forcing them off their lands & signing contracts w/ foriegn companies to exploit the resources under their feet. the ONLF, as i covered at the time, claimed that the chinese killed were shot in the crossfire & not intentionally. they also held on to the remaining chinese nationals until it could be arranged for them to be released to the ICRC, a neutral party in the conflict.

Posted by: b real | Sep 7 2007 20:38 utc | 91

Hillary’s Prayer: Hillary Clinton’s Religion and Politics
Mother Jones, Sept. 1, 2007.
snippet:
“…Through all of her years in Washington, Clinton has been an active participant in conservative Bible study and prayer circles that are part of a secretive Capitol Hill group known as the Fellowship. Her collaborations with right-wingers such as Senator Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) and former Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) grow in part from that connection. “A lot of evangelicals would see that as just cynical exploitation,” says the Reverend Rob Schenck, a former leader of the militant anti-abortion group Operation Rescue who now ministers to decision makers in Washington. “I don’t….there is a real good that is infected in people when they are around Jesus talk, and open Bibles, and prayer.”
Infected (sic.)
mother jones

Posted by: Tangerine | Sep 7 2007 20:55 utc | 92

where’ do murdoch & his pals get their Grand-Guignol commentators
it is a concentration of loud ugly people who screech instead of speak
but they are so unreal they have the character of a golem
at least characters from grimm or dickens

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 7 2007 21:34 utc | 93

Sam, thank you very much for the Iraqi poll @ 77, and the link @ 75. Debat reminds me of Scaramella, the self-styled nuclear proliferation and ecology and everything in between expert who was involved in the Litvinenko case. Very interesting!
And Malooga, thank you for the South America links @ 52, James Petras especially.

Posted by: Alamet | Sep 7 2007 21:39 utc | 94

I love Petras more than Chomsky these days. Better marshalling of data,has lots of information I don’t know, shorter, more concise, more readable, and far more understanding of the true nature of class- struggle. Chomsky sees things in terms of power; for Petras it is class that is the prime determinant. And the guy publishes just as much. He’s a marvel at his age.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 7 2007 22:32 utc | 95

By the way, those links I posted will help anyone to understand what’s going on in Latin America, just as b real’s links help us understand Africa.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 7 2007 22:34 utc | 96

If Catholics were in power in DC, Hillary would be going to Mass.

Posted by: DeAnander | Sep 7 2007 22:46 utc | 97

malooga
i certainly prefer petra to the nietzschean warrior king petraeus

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 7 2007 23:47 utc | 98

Malooga @ 95, no question! These days James Petras is about the only Big Name Intellectual whose writings I try not to miss. (Though I gather he isn’t as big a name in the US left circles as he is in the rest of the world.)

Posted by: Alamet | Sep 8 2007 0:38 utc | 99

Two ZNet articles, both good and informative, looking at the two sides of what is essentially the same coin:
Yves Engler
NGOs and Imperialism
Michael Barker
Do Capitalists Fund Revolutions? (Part 1 of 2)

Posted by: Alamet | Sep 8 2007 0:46 utc | 100