Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 19, 2007
From/To the ‘AMERICA IS LOST’ Department

by Rick

R’giap quoting Martin Buber:

"you can only gain power over the nightmare by calling it by its real name"

I agree with this religious scholar and admire his works and writings. Rgiap has quoted him before and I thank him for introducing him to me. And in an attempt to describe this nightmare, it is exactly those words of his above that I am attempting to heed. To many who live here in the US, the name of this nightmare is not ‘America’. Nor is its name ‘Amerika’.

I have often been a stickler for language when it comes to discussing a subject. Over the last couple of years, I have asked readers of Moon of Alabama to consider everything from the meaning of “conservative” to a more basic mathematical question of “What exactly is a ‘billion’ dollars anyway?” I now wish to not only ponder a definition of ‘America’, but more importantly, place some questions of humanism before us.
Again, though least in importance, is this from Wikipedia:

While many in the United States of America generally refer to the country as America and themselves as Americans many people elsewhere in the Americas resent what they perceive as appropriation of the term in this context and, thus, this usage is frequently avoided. In Canada, their southern neighbour is seldom referred to as "America" with "the United States", "the U.S.", or (informally) "the States" used instead. English dictionaries and compendiums differ regarding usage and rendition.

Of course, all readers understand that when writers here at Moon of Alabama use the word ‘America’, they are referring to the people and their government of the United States of America, or the geographical land thereof.

But more importantly, this simple definition, no matter how narrowly or broadly defined, becomes a term possibly worthy of more study. Most Americans do not consider the current US government as representing what America was, is, or should be. To further complicte things, the word America for many has evolved further and further into an idealized concept that never existed. I am one of those who believe in such an idealized concept and realize that such an ideal may never exist. But believe I do, almost religiously; and rightly or wrongly, I try in small ways to move things toward that ideal.

Some may say I am using the nuances of language as an emotional shield or as an attempt to defend an America that doesn’t exist. Many children are not happy to learn there is no Santa Claus, just as grown up children use language to sheild against an emotional shock, or as an evasion of guilt or embarissment.  In the words of a US President, “it all depends on what your meaning of the word ‘is’ is.” But I argue here to quite the contrary.

When I read a posts like Bea’s where she concludes “America is lost.” it saddens me deeply. I may be wrong about Bea, but it appears obvious to me from this simple post that the word ‘America’ means more to her than what any simple definition can describe. It may represent to her an ideal that is, or at least was, something to be cherished and defended. I believe it is important to save this ideal.  And I believe this ideal is not a threat to any nation or individual.

But for one small moment, let us disregard any worry or discussion upon the meaning of the word “America”. Let us disregard for this moment whether or not an idealized America is even worthy of defense or discussion at all. That is, perhaps the very foundations of America or its Constitution is so fatally flawed, either intrinsically or extrinsically, that it is beyond hope. And let us further disregard for this moment any discussion of collective guilt upon its citizens by actions of the U.S government or state actors.

With that, I now ask this question: “Exactly what good is accomplished by insulting Americans by a derogatory uses of the word America? Millions and millions of Americans hold some idealized concept of America, and hold this ideal as dear to their hearts as their souls. One of the founding fathers of America, Benjamin Franklin, became isolated from his son because of Benjamin Franklin’s nurturing of such an ideal and their arguing over philosophical loyalties.

Yet, even the slandering of this ideal is not sufficient for some here. ‘Debs is dead’ writes:

Amerika is the entity which is intended to be the prime beneficiary of the actions of the US govt. By that I mean Amerika the entity, not all amerikans within that entity.

Of course after reading the above, one is still left wondering exactly who or exactly what is this “entity”?  To be fair, later in this same post, ‘Debs is dead’ describes the members of this ‘entity’ called Amerika:

While all US citizens are amerikans (willingly for most, extremely unwillingly for a goodly chunk) not all amerikans are US citizens.

‘Debs is dead’ continues:

Amerika is the name of the set and amerikans are all the human elements of that set.

Well that certainly clears it all up, eh?

I ask Debs is Dead again: “Is it really worthwhile to slander an entire nation’s population in any attempt to end this nightmare?” There are, without a doubt, millions and millions of people here in your “Amerika” who share your disgust. We share the disgust of an empire that has gone beyond decency, we share your digust in an empire that now justifies torture as a means to an end, and we share your disgust in an empire that has caused the deaths of over a million people in just a few short years. We most likely share in your disgust with a majority if not all of your complaints against this un-American government.

But to insult all americans so completely accomplishes exactly what? Are we so stained in sin that we are of no benefit in bringing change? Would violence against such government along with the certain suicide of the perpetrator be the better part of valor? Perhaps emmigration and denouncing citizenship would bring absolution. If so, please send a list of accepted countries worthy of citizenship. I would gather the list to be quite short.

What some are doing here is little different than what ‘Mr. Truth Gets Viscious’ did when he proclaimed a hatred towards all people religious. ‘Mr Truth gets Viscious’ proclaimed a hatred for billions and billions of human beings who had done nothing more wrong than believing different than himself. But perhaps what some posters are doing in disparaging America is far worse. For one thing, America is not a “club”, an “organization” or a “political party” that one can choose or not choose to belong.

According to the basic rights of the UN Charter, no individual should be forced to join any affiliation against their will. Yet some posters here at Moon of Alabama have forced me into this Amerikan prison, this monolith of evil, and truly against my will. But worse yet, as mentioned earlier, these posters are burying an ideal that is as different from what they believe as to what many Americans believed about Iraq. Of course, destroying peoples hopes and dreams by bombs is obvious, while destroying an ideal by words is not.

One must remember, America is a construct of one’s mind, maybe more so than many other nations as it has more connotations, both good or bad. America is a nation, like so many others, born in blood and it how it will end I do not know. And like all nations, it exists only in the eyes of man.

To be more precise, it is little different than the territory marked by a dog lifting his leg. A dog marks his territory to rule as he chooses even if such boundaries are unknown to man. But instead of piss on grass and trees, we humans go one better; we have written paper with ‘defined rules’ by intellectual elites. Almost reminds me of some intellectuals here, but the “Amerikans” that exist in these intellectual minds do better still. We, the enablers of this “Amerikan” evil, have willfully and preemptively killed those who have made no attempt whatsoever to invade our space.

I doubt that few Americans are actually a part of this ‘entity’. Nearly all Americans have been raped by this nightmare in more ways than even the crudest of porn could portray. And this rape of Americans has been happening for many years, with or without ‘Shock and Awe’. Naomi Klein’s new book “The Shock Doctrine’ describes just a few of the many sex toys in a large bag of tricks.

Many of us have been raped without shock or fear at all; indeed most of us have been raped in our sleep. While Americans are busy watching sporting events on television, corporate sponsors are busy behind the scenes with their lobbyist pimps. No electric shock is needed for most of our brains; they are already filled with apathy. I must say, the pimps keep us entertained quite well.

Yet my discussion here is not directed at Americans, why bother anyway, as many have left reading or posting here for the very reasons I put forth. Worse yet, there almost appears to be a subtle point that we “Amerikans” deserve this rape and abuse. We have been born with an “Original Sin” and marked with a “666” on our souls, and with hardened hearts that only a foreign intellectual can judge.

I propose that only a stagnant mind could assume that Americans would be intentionally so self abusive logic does little to ease my worries about any debate regarding America. In fact, I personally feel that thinking in binary terms of Logic and Set Theory in describing “Amerika” is below that of the living, yes below that of my dog. All hail the mighty “Nand Gate” philosophy where all of reason can be construed by merely the use of two distinct operations of logic! Of course ‘Mr. Truth Gets Vicious’ has informed us that only in recent history have humans been able to grasp Boolean Logic. I would have argued that such principles of “and”, “or” and “not” are kindergarten level but dead Debs has unfortunately proved me wrong.

Perhaps it is beyond my understanding; but I for one, would put my money on a living dog instead of a stagnant mind and sheer logic. If I misunderstand posters through my religious prejudices, my egotism, my nationalism, my lack of ability to perceive the world, or even my ignorance in logic/set theory, be assured that there are millions of idiots like myself that are insulted also.

But enough of this collective guilt, and of this moment of divisiveness posing as debate. I have no guilt in working to achieve an ideal America, an America that closely resembles the ideals that my founding fathers had envisioned. Such is the America that exists in my heart and mind and it is not a fool’s dream. There is a range from similar to wholly different ideals held in many minds throughout the world. In doing so, I find no need to insult anyone merely by their national association, or approach those who are powerless and silent with hate or insults. Again, what I sometimes percieve here at Moon of Alabama is an attempt to blame the victims along with the deviants while burying an ideal. If one does not agree with that ideal that is fine. But in some real way, America as a nation did progress where things were once better than they were today. 

Surely not all shared in the wealth, but progress was being made. This is not ‘kool aid’ talk either, for I remember my younger days when the US Middle Class was large and growing. Marginalized minorities were gaining discretionary income. That is not the case today. How and why the citizens became so asleep I don’t know for sure. Clearly entertainment and materialsim has become a disease of epic proportions, while interest in arts and education are very lacking. And the situation appears to become worse with each new generation. This has been the greatest detriment to improving the political situation.

”The real struggle is not between East and West, or capitalism and communism, but between education and propaganda.” – Martin Buber

Finally, for anyone to suggest that millions of people in your “Amerika” have little or no regard for others lives, especially those of other nationalities, is more than insulting. Through my culture and religious beliefs, I recognize clearly the genocide that is taking place in Iraq. I regret now that I have not finished my writing concerning religion. Just as I was insulted by the actions of US leaders and US soldiers who had no regard for the personal beliefs of “their” Muslim prisoners, I am equally insulted for not only myself, but for the countless Americans who have played no part in the Iraqi conflict, but yet are deemed willful benefactors in an Iraqi genocide. 

Though others will disagree, I assure everyone, there never was, and never will be any benefit to America or to a single true American in this Iraq War. The greatest costs have yet to be felt for everyone, although considering what the Iraqi people have already endured, it is beyond my imagination how the metaphysical universe can still hold in reserve so much anquish. I pray that the Iraq nightmare can be halted. Even now my disgust grows without limits – from the actions of Blackwater and other private mercenaries, to the actions of US prison guards who had so little respect for those of Muslim belief, alas, these US soldiers actually used the prisoner’s religious beliefs as weapons against them. All this at the behest of those located in Washington DC.

America’s political leaders are nothing more than wolves in sheep’s clothing. They have soiled the very same International agreements that they helped write and have spit upon the US Constitution they swore to protect. I freely choose not to call these US citizens ‘Americans’ for what they do is truly un-American in a very real sense of the word. Americans are against this war, they are against their US government and many of us “Americans” are fighting a non-violent war against this current government that most would say we are incapable of fighting. We long for America, but right now, it can’t be found.

Man is no longer able to master the world which he himself brought about: it is becoming stronger than he is, it is winning free of him, it confronts him in an almost elemental independence, and he no longer knows the word which could subdue and render harmless the golem he has created … Man faced the terrible fact that he was the father of demons whose master he could not become. – Martin Buber

I post this lenghty discussion not to insult but because I care. Like the beauty of our physical world which is so mathematically irrational and impossible to quantify, I see so much beauty here at Moon of Alabama. On this very thread, the beauty of rgiaps humanism shines through like a rainbow after a storm.

almost my entire argument against my friend slothrup was based on his refusal to understand that the empire that is controlling & destroying this world has its capital in Washington
the other aspect of my argument against him was essentially – the people were always missing, absent, had disappeared … it seemed only americans appeared

I agree 100% with rgiap’s post above, even more than he may realize. The US government has turned into a cancer that has inflicted the whole world. I would only add that, like a disease, removing the most obvious mass of cancer or removing the cancer from where it originated does not always lead to cure. Although only an acedemic point, one could argue that the seeds of this cancer were already forming long before the US existed. 

The East India Trade Company of England was merchandising slaves and dope on a worldwide scale; perhaps this was already the first ominous sign of this world cancer. Of course the most deadly puppet strings are certainly being pulled from Washington DC. But I repeat, this cancer is pervasive.

The second part of rgiap’s post reveals not only great intellect, but more important, his heart.  Regarding my work (still a draft) on religion, I use rgiap’s same point from an earlier post as almost a central theme. Below is a quick cut and paste from this work in process.

Attitude and intolerance are difficult qualities to describe by simple writing, so I have struggled with some examples of attitudes perceived from past posts.  Most importantly though, I think various societies have been great because of their culture, and religion has been a basic, and very positive, ingredient of any great culture.  The history of China is maybe a good example but probably more complicated and the least familiar…
[snip]
Iraq is maybe the clearest example for most of us, so I will reference that, especially emphasizing the heroic efforts of the Iraqi Resistance to the current occupation.  Iraq, the cradle of civilization, is now turning to rubble and the once proud Iraqi people are witnessing death and destruction on an unprecedented scale.  They are seeing their great culture destroyed even as I write.  I cringe every time I hear about a mosque being destroyed. Not just for the beauty of the architecture, so much more beautiful than the modern, ugly, square buildings of the West.  Each mosque is more than just a religious place of worship; each is (or ‘was’) a part of Iraqi art and culture.  Iraqis have died, their private and public property has been destroyed (or stolen) and all for what?  The “Social Darwinists” in the West contrast so sharply to the Iraqi people.  To believe that spirituality does not play a role in the Iraqi Resistance is to intimidate logic itself.
[snip]

One does not need to read Chomsky, read Moon of Alabama, or any other media “expert” to understand or critique what is happening in Iraq. In this respect, again I wish to commend and quote remembering rgiap where he replied in a heated debate with Slothrup regarding the situation in Iraq:

but again & again what is the most worrying for me – is that in the style of a murdochian mendiant – the iraqi people & their loss & suffering – are nowhere to be seen – in the so-called ‘facts’ that he [Slothrup] brings

It is rgiap’s concern for humanity that wins the argument in my book. Logic alone will never suffice when discussing such subjects. On that note, Bea is also one where her concern for humanity is a power that reaches far beyond her words. It is evident in every one of Bea’s posts.

Most people of the world are looking for change. They are not seeking tyranny from dictatorships, corporatism, or the tyranny from a democracy where rights and freedoms are not protected. Respect towards each individual in society will always be an important part of this quest. To disrespect the individuals of an entire nation because they have done nothing more wrong but to live under an ‘out of control’ government is more than sad. 

I have no doubt that many who arrive here at Moon of Alabama are quickly put off after reading some posts.  ‘Mr. Truth Gets Viscous’ openly proclaims his hatred for all religious people. On another thread, Parvis and Cat Lady have a discussion stating that all religious people living with today’s technology are as dangerous as “psychopaths with chainsaws”. In that thread, readers were treated to such profound questions as: “Is it religion that causes Psychopaths or is it that Psychopaths are drawn to religion?”

Perhaps dead Debs can use some Binary Logic and Set Theory to sort out their questions. Even more stunning is to find Parvis conclude that all organized religion should be outlawed because religious people are as dangerous as nuclear bombs. And then logic easily enables Bernhard and others to conclude that the only way to stop the Iraq War quickly is to have higher body counts of American soldiers. After all, a million dead Iraqis don’t seem to bother most Americans. So with the simple tools of mathematics, a delight with every American’s death is proclaimed. The effects of Agent Orange from so many years ago are still claiming both American and Vietnamese lives every day. Where and with what co-efficient do we place such statistics into our calculations?

Most likely none of Moon of Alabama posters intend to offend anyone (myself excluded of course), yet what is the mathematical set of people offended from these numerous subsets of insults? Quite frankly, I don’t know. But I do know that each of us can be more effective by a little more care in our common strive for change. 

Ironically, we may often offend and turn away the very people who can help us the most. Unfortunately for readers at Moon of Alabama, you loose with me on both counts: I am still here and I don’t know how best to bring change. And I am a common offender when it comes to insults.

However, if knowledge is to be gained, I will take an insult any day of the week rather than silence. I welcome and learn from all the posters here, those who I have just insulted and those who insult me. I even miss reading Slothrup’s posts lately. But cooperation and success is easier achieved with praise than with insults. If praise is too difficult, than let us move forward with tolerance. If tolerance is too difficult, insults will do little. And religion and logic should be everyone’s friend, and never be used simply as tools to dominate or divide.

Comments

“A time comes when silence is betrayal.” And that time has come for us in relation to Vietnam Iraq.
In my view, that time has come and gone long ago with regard to this war, but that is just my personal opinion.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 22 2007 2:31 utc | 101

Reading these great speeches by these most dignified men, Robeson and MLK, it makes me realize all the more poignantly that we have a complete dearth of leadership in the US today. No one speaks for justice, or for moral values, or for the national good. Everyone is out for his own share of the pie, in one way or the other. Personal benefit trumps all, or if not personal benefit, then party benefit. Where are the resonant voices that are equivalent to these great voices in today’s body politic?
They are deafeningly absent.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 22 2007 2:47 utc | 102

NAND AMERICA
Few people have been shipwrecked, and fewer still
have lived to tell about it, so not to draw an analogy
between the Neo-Zi takeover of America and shipwreck,
but let me tell you, it happens the same way, one moment
you’re cruising along, a nice day, calm seas, you don’t
turn out the vote, and bamm! the chainlocker caves in
on an uncharted rock, and ice cold seawater pours in
like Neo-Zi hordes into the White House, and before
you can get in your survival suit, you’re up to your neck
in diesel oil and fish scum, treading water for your life,
like the moments right after the 9/11 false flag ops.
Read a lot about survivors afterward, for comparison,
and the ones who survived may have spent a moment in
sobbing and moaning about their lost ship and their
now uncertain fate, but probably not like here on MoA.
Once met another survivor, Lou Zamperini, the Olympic
gold medalist shot down in the Pacific, who survived 47
days in a life raft before he was captured by the Japs,
and spent the rest of the war in a concentration camp.
http://tinyurl.com/3bcd3k
Never got to tell him my own story, how we clung to the
wreck as it straddled the pinnacles, then at low tide,
dove into the hold for tools, tore off the wheelhouse
and nailed sheets of plywood over the hole in the hull.
The tide came in, the boat rolled over, and the reef
punched a hole in the other side! So at low tide, we
swam around and nailed plywood on again, then
tied ourselves to the wreck and hung there in the
water, in our survival suits, until the tide returned.
That’s what you do when your own party loses. Fight!
That’s why John Kerry was never a serious candidate.
We got conned, political circus, Red Army, Blue Army.
And not once did skipper and I spend a moment
of maudlin sobbing over our lost ship, our lost
catch, our lost reputations and hopeless lives.
We just got the boat floated, pumped out, got
the diesel fired up again, and headed for the
nearest town. We didn’t tell anyone what had
happened, since wreckers and salvage breakers
are always on the lookout, just like mortgage
brokers and realtors, looking for a tragedy.
We played pool against the locals until we had
enough for a drum of diesel, then we kept on
down the coast towards our port harbor. Even
that wasn’t enough. Only ten miles from port
we ran dry, as the tow boats started to signal,
asking if we wanted aid, knowing they would
own the boat if they could get a hook onto us.
When your party is down on it’s luck, you fight!
When your side just can’t seem to win, you fight!
The skipper and I were fierce with hunger
and starved for sleep, and desparate, but
we didn’t spend a single second swooning
about how great our childhood was, or oh,
whoa is me, what happened to our futures.
I jumped into my survival suit again while
skipper fended off the salvors, and swam
a mile through the surf to the Coast Guard
station on the hill, carrying two jerry cans.
C.G. wouldn’t help us unless we reported
a wreck, so on the way back down the hill
I helped myself from their storage tanks.
Then walking a mile down to the sea with
80 pounds of diesel, and swimming through
the surf a mile to our boat, we were able
to make port late that night and tie up safe,
free of debt or entanglement to any salvor.
Skip and I never talked about the wreck,
we never talked about the lost season,
we never moaned about how unlucky
we were. That winter I saw him out on
the fishing grounds working for some
other skipper. We waved to each other.
Shit happens, you shake it off and move on.
That was nothing. That same decade came
the news of Aleut eskimos lost at sea on an
ice floe for six months! Something tells me
they didn’t sit at their keyboards solipsizing
about the wonderful childhoods they had, and
how awful their future looked like it might be.
http://tinyurl.com/2tbc53
And just last year, came the story of three
Mexican fishermen who went adrift at sea
and spent nine months alone on the Pacific!
http://tinyurl.com/pyute
Do you suppose they wrote little cribbed
notes filling volumes of toilet paper, telling
each other how wonderful life back in their
hometown had been, and wondering when
they’d take their last breath?
I don’t think so!
Compared to that, this seven years under the
Neo-Zi’s is a walk in the park. Celebrate life!
Be ready to fight for it, not ooze on a keyboard!
Join a PAC! Work for some political candidate!
Hell, roll up your sleeves and run for office!
To arms, to arms, the redcoats are winning!
Otherwise all of US truly will be Nand America.
Peris Troika

Posted by: Peris Troika | Sep 22 2007 4:07 utc | 103

Hmmm. Some badly planned blobs of acrylic completely miss the carapace. Lying on the deck they look like nothing so much as a steaming dog turd.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Sep 22 2007 6:00 utc | 104

DeAn,
right now in Germany we are paying around EUR 1.40 per liter of gasoline x 3.85 liters/gallon = EUR 5.39 x $1.40 per euro = $7.54 per gallon.
The USA would go to war before its consumers would pay prices like that: it would have no choice, either. Hordes of enraged SUV drivers would invade Canada & Mexsico to sieze the Pemex reserves and the Albertan oil shale reserves.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Sep 22 2007 6:54 utc | 105

Hey Rick,
I’m sure you worked hard on your initial post — but did you have any idea how rich a thread it would generate? WoWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!
*********
Kate Smith couldn’t hold a candle to Paul Robeson
***********
Again, DeAnander,
I have always thought a lot of your posts, both here and over at Feral Scholar, but you betray your lack of knowledge of poverty with your advocating of $8 gasoline, the Green version of shock therapy. Spend some time working with the poorest of Americans, learn how the emergency food bank system works where you live and who uses it, listen to Michael Hudson see below), before you advocate for the most regressive of taxes. Sure, Europe has $8 Petrol — but they also have shorter distances, better mass transit, a less regressive tax system, socialized medicine, a better safety net, poverty is not criminalized, etc, etc, etc. Give Americans all of those benefits, and I’m sure the poor would be better able to handle it.
$8 Petrol also means $8 home heating oil. Between that and the fact that Americans are spending a greater percentage of their income on housing than ever before in history, you will be chipping put frozen elderly and poor people encased in blocks of ice until midsumer.
If you want to legislate equality, you must start from the top down, redistributing what you generate to the poor. You place yourself in company of Reagan and the neo-liberals by legislating from the bottom up, and asking the poorest among us to bear the pain.
US Air Carriers alone chalk up 750 Million flights/yr, for a total of 500 Billion miles traveled, 10B gallons of jet fuel consumed. Why not tax that and give the money to the poor to help them cope with massive upheaval.
Someone else posted this, but everyone should listen to the Aug 15th & 22nd interview with Michael Hudson on Guns and Butter, to understand where the gangsters are taking us and what it means for the poor. It is a concise way to explain what is happening before our very eyes to the ignorant.
Again, great thread. Thanks Rick.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 22 2007 7:13 utc | 106

@ralphieboy – 90 – Just like every American knows all about a certain 12 years of German history that the Germans hardly learn anything about,
Do you have anything to support your platitude here? Third Reich, its development, realisation and aftermath is usually the biggest chunk in highschool history&society lessons. For regular high-school it fills up some 50+ teaching hours in total plus an excursion to one of the former concentration camps.
(sorry, but I hate such unfounded opinions)

Posted by: b | Sep 22 2007 7:26 utc | 107

If he is noted during BH lessons, would it emphasize his singing and acting career?
small coke 100, if you follow my first BHM link @#96..1/2 way down, after fredrick douglas, is an example of how he is remembered.
another BHM site teaching tolerance has a link to the paul robeson centennial i strongly recommend.
here is another BH curriculum
no, i think he will be remembered foremost as a humanist/activist.

Posted by: annie | Sep 22 2007 9:00 utc | 108

Take Me The Way I Am
for the dreamy.

Posted by: anna missed | Sep 22 2007 9:25 utc | 109

& it is necessary to remember the ‘communism’ of a person like theodore dresiser or a paul robesom was simply another way of saying there was a better world
as out time exposes more than any other – in the dark times – absolutes are the only thing on offer to fight back
in their case it neither impoverished their humanity – or degraded their courage – on the contrary it underlined it

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 22 2007 10:44 utc | 110

b,
sorry, I should have talked about what Germans “learned”: I was referring to the older generation Germans, who went to school in the 50’s and 60’s and were not exposed to the modern curriculum.
But, unfortunately, even in the modern curriculum, I see the children being exposed to a lot of facts and figures that they learn to regurgigate and forget, and not being drawn into a discussion of how dictatorships arise in the first place, and, more importantly, how to recognize the signs of it coming.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Sep 22 2007 12:29 utc | 111

b
i just think ralphieboy presumed it was like in english speaking countries or as in france where just a baccaluareat – a completely ficticious form of hostory is passed off as truth
i was a top history student & if i had just depended on my schools – i would have understood that the british & american fought day & night from 1939 – 45, that there were not the betrayals of crete, greece, singapore, new guinea etc etc – that the american saved oceania at pearl harbour etc etc that the bloodthirsty russians didn’t face 350 divisions on the eastern front, that there was no battle of koursk, stalingrad, moscow or berlin etc etc etc
in france it wasn’t until the late 80’s that there commenced to be a real assessment of the war years & that was led by the american scholar paxton
so it’s a honest presumption

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 22 2007 12:34 utc | 112

Rick > on education. .. There is a point to be made that US elites – for lack of a better word – have systematically oppressed their own people, financially, socially and health wise, with poor or insufficient education being the prerequisite for the others. Particularly of course in the area of mathematics and logic, with history and geography in its broad sense after that. That is a strong statement and not useful as it explains nothing. The root of the disease is maybe ‘capitalism’ – or a blind belief in the new religions, ‘economics’, the ‘market’, etc. It the America dream means ripping others off, usually expressed in other terms, the dream will evaporate, or rather go down in flames and violence. As it has been for many years now. Violence within, justified by nutty ideology, and of course profitable for some, violence towards the outside, to rally the inside towards external enemies. In the end, a fractioned society, divided and starving – like Iraq. Israel is similar in some ways. — A simplistic vision, to be sure, and somewhat apocalyptic.
The resource crunch (peak oil, > price of gas, water, arable land, grain reserves, etc.) is real and of course accelerates the whole process, as it raises the specter of limits, limits that are not acceptable to the elite so must be compensated for. Slave labor, first outside and inside under the radar, is one traditional way. Another is war, which fulfills many purposes at once, not least the hope of grabbing the needed stuff. A third is fundamentalist indoctrination, which is pretty cheap and easy. A fourth is collective sui/geno/cide (there is a term for that but I forget), leaving only the top sitting pretty.
The US is tentatively exploring all these paths *at once.*
As for the rest of da West, I have made my critical position quite clear in many posts.

Posted by: Tangerine | Sep 22 2007 16:20 utc | 113

tangerine
i wouldn’t blame even tthe hardiest of us from feeling a little apocalyptic these days

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 22 2007 16:34 utc | 114

rgee,
the modern German curriculum is certainly a great improvement and a lot closer to the truth than the version we got in the USA.
We certainly were not taught to see WWII as primarily a struggle between Stalin and Hitler with secondary theaters of operation in Western Europe and the Pacific, which were relatively small in comparison to the struggle on the Eastern Front.
But I saw the side effects of the new German curriculum during the debate over German involvement in Afghanistan when Joschka Fischer, the ex-radical street fighter-turned Foreign Minister of Germany, had to remind his own Green party that true pacifism does not just means “no more war”, it also means “no more Auschwitz”.
There is a great difference between pacifism and passivism.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Sep 22 2007 17:06 utc | 115

well yes..
but following what is usually seen as positive, in a conventional frame:
The US has still a fertile land, and possibilities for expansion, tremendous territory, natural riches. It has agri surplus in basic foods, though these are dependent on fossil fuels, mechanized agriculture, water pumping like you would not believe, and subject to arbitrary Gvmt. / Big biz control, perhaps not the best way of doing things. It has lost its industrial base and many of its export industries; has little reasonable transport, but these could be recovered/created quite rapidly. (Eg. barges, light rail, proper truck pooling, ‘clean’ coal mining, steel works, etc.) Its people are fractioned to be sure, and the US is a class society, with oppressed minorities, a slave labor class. The flag waving, the sense of being American, the will to do, innovate, work hard, etc, is still there, and could be harnessed. (Not for a war on Iran.) Its people are semi-educated (discussions and definitions aside) are are used to relying on ‘leaders’,’the tv’, etc. and that can also be seen as positive – the propaganda tools are in place. A Marshall type plan on energy, agri, would be possible. It could be done.
That might have happened in 1973. Ok so that conventional view is not pertinent. It is outdated, dusty, based on the idea of ‘nation states’ and ‘friendly capitalism’ etc. Don’t really believe in it myself…but within conventional paradigms much could be done and it would on the whole be less devastating that what is going down now.

Posted by: Tangerine | Sep 22 2007 17:25 utc | 116

Joschka Fischer, the ex-radical street fighter-turned Foreign Minister of Germany, had to remind his own Green party that true pacifism does not just means “no more war”, it also means “no more Auschwitz”.
The Greens had a special party meeting last weekend and voted against further military engagement in Iraq. They finally recognized that Fischer is just another “liberal interventionist” that hasn’t seen a human right’s case yet that doesn’t deserve some bombing. (wonder what took them so long …)
There is a great difference between pacifism and passivism.
There is a great difference between intervening where one can achieve something and intervening where one makes things worse.
The second case is the usual one so wise people tend to abstain. The “no more Auschwitz” talk is simplistic bull. Who could have intervened from the outside to stop it? There are reasons why nobody did.

Posted by: b | Sep 22 2007 17:39 utc | 117

do you suppose they’re teaching – anywhere – that it was American capital that allowed hitler to triumph? I just recently found out that Hitler invaded Russia for oil – somehow that wasn’t mentioned either. Details…details…
but from my experience, while I took every history course offered in high school, it was a jumbled largely meaningless mess ‘cuz at that age 30 yrs seems like an eternity. And teaching about any war is seriously complicated in America, where pop culture is drenched in violence. I suspect that is not the case in Europe, where everyone has lost their empires & is exhausted from centuries of fighting each other.

Posted by: jj | Sep 22 2007 18:13 utc | 118

My Brothers, the Indians must always be remembered in this land. Out of our languages we have given names to many beautiful things which will always speak to us. Minnehaha will laugh of us, Seneca will shine in our image, Mississippi will murmur our woes. The broad Iowa and the rolling Dakota and the fertile Michigan will whisper our names to the sun that kisses them. The roaring Niagra, the sighing Illinois, the singing Delaware, will chant unceasingly our Dta-wa-e [Death Song]. Can it be that you and your children will hear that eternal song without a stricken heart? We have been guilty of only one sin — we have had possessions that the white man coveted. We moved away toward the setting sun; we gave up our homes to the white man.
My brethren, among the legends of my people it is told how a chief, leading the remnant of his people, crossed a great river, and striking his tipi-stake upon the ground, exclaimed, “A-la-ba-ma!” This in our language means “Here we may rest!” But he saw not the future. The white man came: he and his people could not rest there; they were driven out, and in a dark swamp they were thrust down in to the slime and killed. The word he so sadly spoke has given a name to one of the white man’s states. There is no spot under those stars that now smile upon us, where the Indian can plant his foot and sigh “Al-a-ba-ma.” It may be that Wakanda will grant us such a place. But it seems that it will be only as His side.
— Khe-tha-a-hi, or Eagle Wing

u.s. states with native american names
alabama
alaska
arizona
arkansas
california
connecticut
illinois
iowa
kansas
kentucky
massachusetts
michigan
minnesota
mississippi
missouri
nebraska
north dakota
ohio
oklahoma
south dakota
tennessee
texas (spanish ver of caddo word)
Utah
wisconsin (french ver of ojibwa)
wyoming
[note: “indiana” is not an indian word; rather it was used by land surveyors to refer to indian territory]
the number of rivers, counties, and cities still retaining indian names in this country is overwhelming. it is still occupied land.

Posted by: b real | Sep 22 2007 19:11 utc | 119

b,
of course the Allies created a mess in Afghanistan as well, but I believe the intervention was well justified. Even if we could not stop the Taliban there, we had to keep them from acting with impunity. If the situation there has since gone to hell in a handbasket, it is because other members of the coalition allowed themselves get too wrapped up in Iraq.
Of course, there was a political aspect to it as well: I read the expression on German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder’s face when he visited Ground Zero in Manhattan in 2001 as saying: “Oh my God. Frankfurt – financial center of Europe, skyscrapers, major airport. Must act!”
He turned to his Green coalition partners and made it clear that support for German involvement in Afghanistan was tanamount to a vote of confidence, and all but a few die-hard passivists in the Green party bit down hard and supported him.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Sep 22 2007 21:05 utc | 120

@Malooga the respect is mutual, but on this issue of how to address poverty we are, it seems, doomed to disagree. or perhaps it is that our personal experiences diverge so widely that our assumptions are disjoint sets…. in my town I have worked with the local Homeless Project, which runs a large organic vegetable and flower garden to generate both food and income for the poor and dislocated; also have worked with the local Bike Church which provides free bikes for the indigent. I’ve bike-trailered donations over to the homeless center, where showers, food, secure lockers and basic first aid are available. so I have some familiarity with local services for the poor, and ways in which they can be supported w/o automobile dependence. the poorest people I’ve met/worked with don’t have cars and don’t buy petrol, and most of them are hooked into the Homeless Garden Project. so that’s the system I’m familiar with, and it’s helped/fed/sheltered a lot of people.
imho the food bank model — as I understand it, where longhaul packaged corporate food products are handed out under State control to a passive clientele — is better than starvation, but it still works to enforce control and dependence, whereas urban gardening (or urban/rural partnerships like Pi Ranch near Davenport CA, which supports an urban at-risk-youth centre in SF) work towards autarky and genuine food security for the poor. I support efforts like the farmworker’s land initiative which offers low- and no-interest loans to low income immigrant farm workers to buy their own land for subsistence and market gardening. also support various urban farming projects elsewhere in the US which are focussed on delivering food to poor n’hoods.
heating oil obviously needs to be subsidised in states where it’s a survival issue; but as long as we keep energy costs artificially low across the board there is no incentive for the wealthy not to squander outrageously — as they do with their 10 mpg H2s and their 8000 sf trophy homes — and this squandering means war, whether now or later. perhaps the solution is energy subsidies or credits for low-income citizens, and zero subsidy (or a sliding scale price system like Finnish traffic tickets!) for the more affluent, who would then be highly motivated to become early adopters of more efficient technologies. I personally would prefer to develop the more efficient technologies at the bottom, i.e. relocalise food systems, reduce auto dependence, improve public transit, relocalise employment, so that the poor benefit first rather than waiting for saner technologies to trickle down from on high.
I do take your point that, all other things being equal, a one-parameter change like true-cost petrol would be regressive — sales tax is essentially regressive, too. but in a political environment where true-cost petrol was even on the cards, it would not be the only parameter being changed; for example there is the proposal to shift taxation from income to carbon emissions, which would be a great relief to wage-earners and a big bite for polluters, gas-guzzlers, and frequent flyers. if the political climate changed enough that we stopped subsidising the cost of refined petroleum to the tune of 7 or 8 tax dollars per gallon, I think a lot of other policies would be changing simultaneously that would make this not a single regressive shift, but part of a broader, more democratic systemic change.
however, it is fairly certain that we are arguing about moonshine and fairy dust here… because there’s no indication that any US politician of any party will ever call for true cost energy pricing. that moment will come only involuntarily, when US military power is no longer capable of looting or extorting energy resources from other countries. at which point we’ll all be pretty much up the creek, especially the poor (unless there’s an explosion of the kind of urban garden and food security projects of the kind I’ve been supporting, and since I’m betting on the worst-case outcome for elite policy I’m trying to encourage that explosion of local food systems any way I can).
seems to me that Euroland doesn’t magically “have” public transit that we don’t, it just has better public transit. intercity distances are shorter, but is intercity travel the big issue? and we could have better public transit, we just choose not to. unfortunately the prime motivators for public transit provision is perceived public transit demand, and one of the prime motivators for public transit demand is fuel pricing (another is gridlock). We keep subsidising private automobile use, which then gives us a good reason not to improve public transit, which then makes public transit unreliable and intermittent, which forces more people into automobile dependence. Something has to break that cycle, because we can’t go on subsidising cheap petrol for another 2 or 3 generations… maybe not even for another 1.
And yeah, if we stopped burning all that petroleum in military vehicles, there would be more to spare; but all those military vehicles and ops are required to keep stealing/extorting the petroleum [the Spice must flow], so it’s a finger trap… without that military might, keeping fossil fuel cheap wouldn’t be a policy option 🙁
o.c. the direction the US seems to be headed right now is coal liquefaction, an obvious boondoggle and environmental disaster… and not calculated to help the poor much either, particularly the Appalachian poor who are being driven from their homes by the devastation of MTR (internal colonialism anyone?) migawd, the system is so broken (unless you are one of the accumulators at the top) that I just don’t know where to start; so I start with local food security, since it seems to address a lot of issues at once.

Posted by: DeAnander | Sep 23 2007 6:24 utc | 121

but within conventional paradigms much could be done and it would on the whole be less devastating that what is going down now.
yes tangerine. thanks for the inkling of hope

Posted by: annie | Sep 23 2007 7:16 utc | 122

of course the Allies created a mess in Afghanistan as well, but I believe the intervention was well justified. Even if we could not stop the Taliban there, we had to keep them from acting with impunity. If the situation there has since gone to hell in a handbasket, it is because other members of the coalition allowed themselves get too wrapped up in Iraq
I find so many things wrong with this statement that I simply can not let it stand un-challenged.
First of all, who are the Allies that created a mess in Afghanistan? This timeline shows a great deal of English involvement but also Persian and Russian…hardly allies.
What exactly did the Taliban need to be stopped from doing? They had severely cut the production of opium and had begun to unite the tribes of Afghanistan. the bullshit spouted by the rightwingers concerning burkas and women’s rights has not changed in the slightest in Afghanistan and has got much worse in other places as a result of US intervention. The Taliban had visited Texas and were making deals with oilmen in the US. There are accounts as to how the Taliban were trying to give up bin Laden to the US. In the end they were all betrayed and the invasion was launched out of blind hate and fear filled revenge to satisfy the bread and circus loving domestic audience as well as get people used to the idea of killing muslims in far away places.
dropping GPS guided bombs from B-52s orbiting 5 miles above on proud and brave horsemen determined to defend their homeland from foreign invaders yet again may be your idea of well justified, but it offends me to no end.
after reading the great commentary in the thread sparked by Ricks wonderful post, ralphieboy’s comment is like finding a hair in your food.

Posted by: dan of steele | Sep 23 2007 9:49 utc | 123

Even if we could not stop the Taliban there, we had to keep them from acting with impunity.
Bullshit indeed. We had to do jack-shit, Ralphieboy.

Posted by: DM | Sep 23 2007 10:08 utc | 124

DofS,
they were training terrorists. They had to be shut down, or at least have thier operations interrupted. We started to make some progress on that front, but the progress stalled. We turned from combatting terrorism to negotiating with warlords. Blame it on the British intervention, the Russian invasion or the US obsession with Iraq if you want.
Uning military force has to be a last-choice solution, and when it comes to that, it takes a lot of work and committment to hang on and help clean up the mess created by the war, not to mention the mess that existed beforehand. That is where the allies have failed in Afghanistan: the resources and energy needed to turn Afghanistan into a governable country hanve been redirected at turning Iraq into another ingovernable country.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Sep 23 2007 20:12 utc | 125

they were training terrorists
that is a bit general. the planning for the attack on the WTC and Pentagon was done in Hamburg Germany. Would you say that the German government was training terrorists too? While it may be true that groups of men went to Afghanistan to learn how to do bad things, it is true that almost every nation on earth teaches men how to do bad things. the men we currently fear/hate have received training in Bosnia, Chechnya, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia as well as in Afghanistan and now Iraq.
Afghanistan was invaded because it lies in a strategic location. Look at a map, having military bases that close to Iran, China, and the ickystans is a wet dream. the excuses to invade were invented, the goal was met.
Tom Tomorrow or rather a penguin explains it quite clearly.

Posted by: dan of steele | Sep 23 2007 21:44 utc | 126

DoS,
the German government was not running the terror camps or even condoning their existence, hence that was a weak comparison.
I agree that Afghainsitan was invaded for a lot of reasons that go beyond shutting down the terrorist operations. And I am terribly disappointed about the way that the occupation and cursory attempts at establishing a government have been conducted.
But I still think that inaction on our part would have been a worse option.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Sep 24 2007 8:22 utc | 127

back to the third-party option:
perhaps one of the most valuable restraints in a civilized society is the power of debate. Not to mention the empowering, educational & inspirational role of debate. But the Dems & the Repubs no longer debate each other in any real/sincere sense of the word. Nor do they debate within themselves much more than the means to expand office & power.
and one of the challenges for a new party as always is how it defines itself relative to the incumbents. And from a practical standpoint, as the ideological domain occupied by both parties continues to narrow, so does the context of political debate. And any new party that defines itself relative to the existing parties risks either being likewise confined to the same narrowed political spectrum (hence just another wannabee), or being dismissed as unrealisticallly out-of-touch/on-the-fringe. Thats just the way we have been conditioned to digest (& label) political content. And its a trap.
However, theres enough dissaffected out there that a new party that committed itself to “bringing back true & sincere debate” to the issues, rather than any specific set of ideological agenda should get some attention. Anybody with an articulate point of view would be welcomed to contribute to the debate & compete for elected office (under the new party’s bannner) if they so wish, regardless of their political disposition.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Sep 24 2007 10:52 utc | 128

Why some candidates are unelectable for President.

Posted by: ‘citizen’ | Sep 24 2007 18:54 utc | 129

I think this lunacy fits best here rather than in OT:
Famed Lebanese musician’s show in San Diego is canceled because…there was no Israeli artist to “balance” his act
You just gotta read it. Surely we are nearing the end of this lovely “era” of US history, no? Puleeeeez.

Posted by: Bea | Sep 26 2007 4:22 utc | 130

The scariest part is that I’m not really surprised:
Arrested, handcuffed and jailed for coughing

Posted by: ‘citizen’ | Sep 29 2007 5:28 utc | 131