Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 19, 2007
U.S. Commercializes Spying

It is high time for the European and the world’s business community to understand how U.S. spying is endangering their economic activities.

With the changed FISA laws the U.S. government can now legally spy on foreign communication without warrents and oversight. It earlier gained access to data about international money transfers. At the same time it outsources spying and data analyzing to private U.S. companies that are direct competitors of European businesses.

There is some concern in Europe how this effects the privacy of their citizens. But I have not yet seen a single piece written on the economic threat this poses to European businesses.

When I talk to my consulting customers about the issue, I find they are not only uninformed but also rather ignorant of the possible effects.

As explained by the NYT’s Risen and Lichtenblau, the new FISA law goes far beyond what has been said to be its original utility:

These new powers include the collection of business records, physical searches and so-called “trap and trace” operations, analyzing specific calling patterns.

For instance, the legislation would allow the government, under certain circumstances, to demand the business records of an American in Chicago without a warrant if it asserts that the search concerns its surveillance of a person who is in Paris, experts said.

Imagine a European company with sales offices in the U.S. Not only will the email and phonecalls between the office and the headquarter be read and listen too by the U.S. government, but any confidential technical documentation send to the sales office may get copied. From there it could easily end up in the hands of a U.S. business.

Most Europeans still seem to trust the U.S. government not to reveal such trade secrets to their competitors. But it is no longer simply the U.S. government that has access to the gathered information.

As Walter Pincus writes in today’s Post:

The Defense Intelligence Agency is preparing to pay private contractors up to $1 billion to conduct core intelligence tasks of analysis and collection over the next five years, …

To do analysis and collection for the DIA, Boeing, Lockheed or whoever will win those contracts, will have direct access to the information gathered by the NSA and other agencies.

If Airbus plans to make an offer to United Airlines, would the numbers in that offer stay secret to the direct competitor? This while Boeing staff might have access to Airbus’ U.S. Internet traffic via its DIA contracts?

If SAP sends a confidential new version of its business software package from its headquarter in Germany to train their personal in Japan, while Oracle staff does analysis of such traffic for the DIA, might that version end up in Oracle’s product labs?

‘Fair game’ U.S. folks might think. But their pension fund is not unlikely to hold SAP shares. Lots of U.S. mutal funds, expecting some further decline of the US dollar, have investments in European companies. The wellbeing of these companies is not only in European interest.

The U.S. has a history of using the Central Intelligence Agency, the NSA and its Echelon surveillance network to spy on companies in Europe. At least some U.S. communication software used all over the world, like Lotus Notes, has back-doors that allow for its manipulation by U.S. secret services.

Back in 1999 the European parliament looked into the issue and published a report that alleges such. Later former CIA director James Woolsey admitted as much, though he claimed that this doesn’t happen for industrial espionage but only to "fight bribery".

All this is therefore nothing really new one might say.

But the new legality of these activities, the unprecedented scope and the direct access of private U.S. companies to the captured data should be of more concern. When such ‘opportunities’ arise for U.S. companies and a lot of money is at stake, abuse is likely to happen.

Not only private citizens are endangered by FISA. Companies, commerce chambers and politicians around the world who care for the economic well being of their societies should be alarmed too.

Comments

France has been doing government-backed commercial espionage for many years. It’s the Orwellian control of unfettered monitoring of citizens that’s the true menace.

Posted by: Other Rouser | Aug 19 2007 23:17 utc | 1

I believe it this is part of the Bush administration’s plan to destroy all sectors of the US economy other than finance/military/oil. The obvious economic value of moving the switches outside the US will soon cause changes in the net.

Posted by: citizen k | Aug 20 2007 3:02 utc | 2

It’s good you brought this up again — I remember well the Echelon flap from some years back.
I also remember how quickly it faded away, with some “experts” saying that Echelon couldn’t really do all that much, what with the amount of info flow.
But we can trust these people — I mean they might edit Wikepedia in their favor, but they would never use trawlled info to increase their profit!

Posted by: Chuck Cliff | Aug 20 2007 3:50 utc | 3

The amount of power this administration has shovelled into corporate hands in the form of private armies and private spooks means we do not only have to worry about countries causing war but also anybody with sufficent funds and connections. The new FISA law mandates State Welfare for corporate spooks with all expenses paid pork. It’s the new world order.

Posted by: Sam | Aug 20 2007 4:15 utc | 4

Excellent essay b…
Then we have the following which dovetails nicely. Contractors in Iraq Have Become U.S. Crutch

When years from now historians and government officials reexamine precedents set by the U.S. experience in Iraq, many “firsts” are likely to pop up.
One still playing out is the extraordinarily wide use of private contractors. A Congressional Research Service report published last month titled “Private Security Contractors in Iraq: Background, Legal Status, and Other Issues,” puts it this way: “Iraq appears to be the first case where the U.S. government has used private contractors extensively for protecting persons and property in potentially hostile or hostile situations where host country security forces are absent or deficient.”
Only estimates are available for the total employment by contractors in Iraq that perform “functions once carried by the U.S. military,” according to the study. Testimony at an April 2007 congressional hearing gave the impressive figure of 127,000 as the number working in Iraq under Defense Department contracts. Breakdowns don’t exist, but one Pentagon official said less than 20 percent were American.
CIA and the Pentagon intelligence agencies have hired contractors in Iraq, but the tasks and the funds involved are secret.
Surge or no surge, the work that contractors do there remains highly dangerous. The study reports that private contractors risk death and injury handling security for convoys that carry gasoline, oil and all sorts of supplies and equipment into and around Iraq.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 20 2007 10:44 utc | 5