Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 4, 2007
The Democrats’ Burgfrieden

August 4th, an interesting date.  On August 4th 1914 the German Sozial Demokratische Partei (SPD), the lefty social democrats, voted and agreed in the German parliament on Kaiser Wilhelm II’s request for war credits. Without that vote, World War I would likely not have happened.

"We will not abandon our own fatherland in a time of danger," the SPD leaders said. This was a ‘peace within the castle’ (Burgfrieden) compact with the conservatives the SPD did hold throughout that war. (In France something similar happened named Union sacrée.)

That led to an internal party split that was made official in 1917 with the foundation of the ‘independent social democratic party’ (USPD) in 1917. The parties reunited some 7 years later on a more left position.

(A quite similar split happened again during recent years over
neoliberal SPD policy and German participation in the war on the
Pashtuns. It was made official when ‘Die Linke’ (The Left) became an
official new German party this year. [Full disclosure – I am with
them.]  According to every available poll, the new party will get over
10% in the next state and national elections. The general effect of
this, which will take some years, will hopefully be a considerable move
of the political spectrum to the left.)

On August 3rd the Democrats in the U.S. Senate, despite having a
controlling vote, gave the Bush/Cheney ‘unitary executive’ more rights
to spy on its people without any judiciary control.

This even though there was much public backing not to do so. The editors of the NYT and the LA Times had spoken out against changing the FISA law.

Every halfway lefty blog I read yesterday and today is heavily
criticizing that vote. Writing from The Yearly Kos meeting even
Greenwald reports and opines:

But
the only issue anyone in the room really wanted to discuss — including
us — was the outrage unfolding on Capitol Hill. And the anger was
almost universally directed where it belongs: on Congressional
Democrats, who increasingly bear more and more responsibility for the
assaults on our constitutional liberties and unparalleled abuses of
government power — many (probably most) of which, it should always be
emphasized, remain concealed rather than disclosed.

Examine virtually every Bush scandal and it increasingly bears the
mark not merely of Democratic capitulation, but Democratic
participation.

Suffice to say, craven fear, as usual, is the author of this debacle.

Well – it took only a few long years for Glenn and the DKos crowd to get the obvious …

The new law will of course be used for, now legally, to spy on the
Democrat politicians too, and to weaken their position in the next
election by using whatever is found listening to their calls and
reading their emails. Just as WWI was used by the conservatives (and
the all important military) to deminish the left in Germany.

On the positive side it may help to finally cause a much needed split
within the ‘left’ war-party. That’s about the only hope I have for the
U.S. An energized crowd that has the means to launch something new form
the wreak of the old.

But then, as Ioz says:

Unfortunately, this crowd has epiphanies like a whore has johns: often and not for long.

So it’s just hope, which is, of course, not a plan …

Comments

That’s about the only hope I have for the U.S. An energized crowd that has the means to launch something new form the wreak of the old.

‘Energized’ is an interesting word choice. I do think many have the energy to write, to meet, to organize, to talk, to vote. But I also come back again and again to this poem from Nicaragua by way of Salman Rushdie in The Jaguar Smile:

LA REVOLUCÍON
Se lleva en el corazón
para morir por ella,
y no en los labios
para vivir de ella…

The revolution / is carried in the heart / that it may be died for, / and not on the lips, / that it may be lived by.
In our deepest fear, anger, or sense of duty we are so far from that sentiment as to be able barely to conjure the feeling of it, let alone to be similarly spurred to action (I am not merely yelling ‘bah’ at others – I include myself among the angry, vocal, comfortable and useless). No revolution is coming, and without it no change for the better.

Posted by: mats | Aug 5 2007 0:26 utc | 1

Fuck revolution, let’s talk renegade evolution. All revolution does is replace one authoritarian with another…
It would help if we could collectively give up the material meme, and stop going to The Church of the Consumer. But I am afraid the virus has spread and even the third world has a bad case of it….
It’s like America, that whore, gave the world the clap…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 5 2007 0:54 utc | 2

The 300 million hominids of the USA — who still charmingly refer to themselves as “We, the People” — have long since been surpassed and supplanted by America’s publicly traded corporations and ultra-rich investors, who are now the genuine citizens of the United States, able to vote with dollars, create votes with dollars, massage votes with dollars, manufacture public support for votes with dollars, write all the legislation to be voted upon, choose America’s legislators by means of donating dollars to favored campaigns and, of course, make plenty of dollars out of all of these efforts.
It is a closed system of government of, by and for corporate aims, and those corporate aims are a closed system as well, a system of aiming for short term profits, stablilized monopoly markets, and unregulated access to the resources of “lesser” nations.
What about you and me?
The role of hominids in our advanced capitalist system is to participate economically within the national platform, which is currently the 50 States but will soon become the entire North American continent — the North American Union. Whether the three governments of Canada, Mexico and the USA ever actually merge is utterly beside the point — a distraction. Once their business environment and regulatory, tax, and legal structures operate uniformly, allowing a larger national platform for these increasingly supra-national corporations to operate within, the goal is won.
Three uniformly corporatized governments sharing water, oil, cheap labor, and military defenses is just good old American cost cutting and efficiency.
If these super citizens cannot tell the difference between doing business in any of these three “sovereign nations” then there is no effective difference, to them. The difference will all be felt by the hominids of these three nations, who will then be thrice removed from the original intent of their former governments, which was the simple idea that the people would rule over themselves by representatives duly elected.
That’s right out, mate, in the corporatized system of government. In the new American century, hominids are debt-ridden consumers — or they are troublemakers.
The role they play is that of cattle. They are plants to be harvested. They are parts. They are either functioning parts or bad parts, destined for the dumpster. There is a bottom line to consider, after all.
The owners of the American government are the owners of 85% of America, and of virtually all of America’s capital. The operators of the American government are the selected representatives of its super citizens, and their career goal is to drive the nation in the corporate quest for resources, customers, growth, profits, and power all around the globe.
The notion of minding the nation’s infrastructure, culture, future, and taking care of the people as any kind of priority is quite literally insane under this system, wherein the people are not the people anymore — only business entities are people now. That’s who the government is here to serve.
There is only the need for PR, spin, and lip service to the hominids, who are encouraged to partake of staged horse races called elections, to blog, to write letters, to sign petitions and make phone calls, to gather in conventions to flex their non-existent political muscles, non-existent because political muscle is spelled d-o-l-l-a-r-s. If you cannot outright buy a political representative — including seeing to his comforts and status and perks throughout his lifetime — then you do not have a political representative.
Just as a lobbyist is someone who pushes a certain agenda for pay, a political representative is a lobbyist who pushes the agenda of those who pay for his election, and see to his needs after political retirement.
The need for lip service to keep the hominids apathetically participating creates War Party Left, and War Party Right, both of whom feel totally free to ignore hominids in any number at any time in favor of assiduously serving their paymasters — the super citizens we call corporations, and the super rich.
And why not? They actually, physically, own the whole place. It’s not our country anymore, financially. It’s theirs. They’ve earned it from us using the miracle of compound interest, and now they want it run to suit themselves, and expanded into overseas empire to suit themselves.
If the hominids of America want to rule themselves, they have to take their country back. That won’t be done by working within this closed system. The system has endless loops of wasted efforts and wasted words to contain the hopeful, the optimists, the dedicated, the wide awake fire breathing citizens who throw themselves into changing the system from within.
The Owners know to put such people into one or another of these endless loops, and burn them out in a few short years. In the past hundred years, there has not been one such creature seen to accomplish change from within. There have been many thousands of excellent people burnt, worn out, crushed within the system.
The system has one, and only one, Achilles heel. It cannot continue without hominid participation. No cooperation from the people, and the system gums up, breaks up, and falls down.
They can carry capital away to foreign shores. They can take what they can carry. They cannot take the physical nation away from 300 million hominids who are squatting on it, calling it their country.
When Americans take to the streets of their nation in millions upon millions, and say, “This nation does not belong to the bankers and billionaires, it belongs to us!” then the system will reboot, and people will be people once more.
It will not reboot itself.
I strongly suggest that everybody, everybody, get out of line.

Posted by: Antifa | Aug 5 2007 1:06 utc | 4

Splits on the left are usually only successful when there is some form of proprtional representation. While some elected dem congreespeople or senators may opt for the left split most suspected to be capable of such ‘treachery’ got weeded out long ago.
Even if they do join the new party, the dem party showed what to do with renegades when it backed Joe Lieberman against it’s own. The rethugs helped by not seriously contesting the spot and Lieberprick beat the dem candidate.
Antifa is correct that this fight needs to be taken outside the machine and into the hearts of the people. The dem machine is like a malevolent dictatorship, in that it has evolved into an institution designed to supress internal dissent first, everything else comes behind that goal. DKOS and associated party blogs will allow a short-lived scream of frustration and angst from the members before cracking down, sailing on “for the good of the party” and pretending nothing just happened.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Aug 5 2007 1:49 utc | 5

The House just passed Bush’s FISA bill. Surprise.
Right you are, Debsy, DKOS’s stated purpose is to elect Democrats. That means no matter what they do, how ever many wars they condone, how ever much toadying to the National Security State they do, they’re the good guys.
These people need to know that they do not represent us, and their cowardice and doublespeak are as bad as Republican mindlessness.
PS I am still pissed off.

Posted by: Dick Durata | Aug 5 2007 3:22 utc | 6

“My country, right or wrong!”
“My party, right or wrong!”
“My mother, drunk or sober!”

Only one of these is the dKOS motto . . .

Posted by: Antifa | Aug 5 2007 3:33 utc | 7

Passing this wiretapping bill in such awkward, hurried way, simply doesn’t pass the smell test. We don’t know what has gone on behind closed doors in Congress; but whatever it is, it must be pretty foul. The Fourth Amendment and its protections are sliding into an abyss.

Posted by: Copeland | Aug 5 2007 5:48 utc | 8

By order of the King of the United States
It is now illegal to dance in this place
Please do not dance
By order of the Law of Coincidence
It is now illegal to sing and dance
Please do not dance
It’s mandatory, for love and glory, everybody’s doin’ it now. Break the law. Break break break break the law.
Rob Brezsny, Darby Gould, and World Entertainment War

Posted by: catlady | Aug 5 2007 6:28 utc | 9

I’m incredibly snobbish when it comes to music, however I enjoyed that catlady, love to hear it live. Thx 😉

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 5 2007 6:46 utc | 10

THE INTELLIGENCE OF SCAVENGERS
Atlantic Coast of Nicaragua, 1982
Three vultures walk the ground clumsily
and hunch their wings
like renegade colonels
in rustling cloaks, in full-dress uniform.
They know the geography
of every ambush, the troop movements
of the mercenaries,
turning with an alert salute
of their beaks
to the many beckoning hands
of open graves.
The intelligence of scavengers
is everywhere in the countryside,
patiently scouting the moment
to skin the dead,
to parade arrogantly
among the living.
–Martín Espada

Posted by: Copeland | Aug 5 2007 7:24 utc | 11

Prof. Balkin: The Party of Fear, the Party Without A Spine, and the National Surveillance State

The passage of the new FISA bill by the Senate and now the House demonstrates that the Democrats stand neither for defending civil liberties nor for checking executive power.
They stand for nothing at all.
Conversely, the new bill shows that the Republican Party can get the Democrats to surrender almost any civil liberty– indeed, to give the President just as much unchecked power as he might obtain under a Republican controlled Congress– simply by playing the fear card repeatedly and without shame. And this the Republicans did with gusto in the past few days, with one Senator even suggesting that America would immediately be attacked if the President was not given everything he wanted, no matter how unnecessary the demands, and no matter what alternatives were available.

Behind the current events is a more troubling trend. As Sandy Levinson and I have written, we are in a gradual transition from a National Security State to a National Surveillance State. We pointed out that although the Republicans got first crack at constructing many features of this emerging state, it would be a bipartisan effort. The only issue will be what kind of national surveillance state we would have, and whether government would put in place the appropriate checks and balances to protect civil liberties, prevent the multiplication of secret laws and secret methods of enforcement, and restrain an increasingly ambitious executive.

Between the Party of Fear and the Party Without a Spine, there does not seem to be much opportunity to keep the National Surveillance State benign. Nor does there seem to be any political check on the development of an increasingly authoritarian Presidency, which controls the levers of secrecy, surveillance, and military force.
Do not be mistaken: We are not hurtling toward the Gulag or anything that we have seen before. It will be nothing so dramatic as that. Rather, we are slowly inching, through each act of fear mongering and fecklessness, pandering and political compromise, toward a world in which Americans have increasingly little say over how they are actually governed, and increasingly little control over how the government collects information on them to regulate and control them. Slowly, secretly and imperceptibly, the mechanisms of government surveillance are being freed from methods of political control and accountability; and the liberties of ordinary citizens are being surgically removed under a potent anesthesia concocted from propaganda, fear, ignorance and apathy.
I hope the Democrats are justly proud of themselves for their cowardly contributions to this slow-motion destruction of our constitutional system.

Posted by: b | Aug 5 2007 10:35 utc | 12

@catlady – “break the law”
There is a new movement in Berlin. People steal the air from all four tires (not by hurting the tires) of SUV’s and leave memos on how to conserve energy.
Quite effective …

Posted by: b | Aug 5 2007 10:44 utc | 13

A fact of reality is that there is no possibility of freedom without property and thereby the members of a state are transformed from citizens into consumers, and the state ceases to be an ethical community, transformed into a mere facilitator of transactions. The supreme form of social arrangement becomes the contract and the supreme manifestation of liberty the arbitrary will, the will that commands your choices, choices deprived of all moral content. Isn’t it telling that abortion has become known as choice? and that the possibility of abortion is the end all of the so called progressives? I do not believe that we can go back to another society, we are stuck into this one and what happens is the necessary development of it, History becomes an Embriology. The monster at the end of the development was implicit in the most original gestation.

Posted by: jlcg | Aug 5 2007 14:09 utc | 14

b,
Thanks for your link to the excellent article by Professor Balkin.
The following quote from your post says it all:


…we are slowly inching, through each act of fear mongering and fecklessness, pandering and political compromise, toward a world in which Americans have increasingly little say over how they are actually governed, and increasingly little control over how the government collects information on them to regulate and control them.

Posted by: Rick | Aug 5 2007 14:49 utc | 15

Catlady & b (and also jlcg),
Speaking about breaking the law…

Posted by: Rick | Aug 5 2007 15:20 utc | 16

Here’s the thing —
people talk about this slow slide into total surveillance and total economic control of the citizenry as if it is being done by the political parties, all for reasons of security, terrorism, foreign wars, etc.
It is not.
It’s just business. The Federal government’s role in the affairs of the nation has been subsumed almost entirely to the service of Big Business, most especially FIRE (finance/real estate), oil, armaments, and pharmaceuticals.
The well being of each citizen is no longer seen as a condition of the human being herself; it is seen as a measure of her consumer status. Is she employed, paying taxes, purchasing, running up credit cards, paying a mortgage, watching 2.4 hours of television per day, having 2.6 children, not writing incendiary blog entries, etc.
The people, and the government, are in train behind Wall Street, Madison Avenue, and the Pentagon.
A citizen is not a human being to Wall Street. It is a purchase, it is an hour of labor, it is a crop. You can make money making citizens sick, money treating their symptoms, money entertaining them in their homes, money entertaining them with the political circus inside the Beltway, money sending them to war, money putting them in jail.
Just a commodity, those creatures.

Posted by: Antifa | Aug 5 2007 17:15 utc | 17

Antifa@#4…Yep! Thanks!

Posted by: Ben | Aug 5 2007 18:27 utc | 18

A nation of sheep breeds a government of wolves.
So long as so much of the public buys the “if you’re not doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about” line then pretty much anything will go.
The sad fact is that fascism is an appealing philosophy. Silence and complacency are much easier than protest and activism, sophistry easier than logical argument.
If the public is willing to give up their rights, then the government will be happy to take them.
“I do not blame those determined to control, but those so eager to submit” Thucydides (oft quoted on antiwar.com)

Posted by: Lysander | Aug 5 2007 19:15 utc | 19

From Raw Story
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/FBI_raids_DOJ_attorneys_home_in_0805.html
As Newsweek reports in its August 13 issue, the FBI has used a secret warrant to raid the home of former Justice Department lawyer Thomas M. Tamm, taking three computers and personal files.
The government is searching for the individual who leaked information about President Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program to the press, prompting a New York Times report in 2005. Mr. Tamm worked for the Justice Department during a period in 2004 when critics of the program included then Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI director Robert Mueller. Tamm is said to have shared concern, but whether or not he was actively protesting is unknown.

Posted by: Rick | Aug 6 2007 4:37 utc | 20

Bush Signs Law Widening Reach for Wiretapping

Congressional aides and others familiar with the details of the law said that its impact went far beyond the small fixes that administration officials had said were needed to gather information about foreign terrorists. They said seemingly subtle changes in legislative language would sharply alter the legal limits on the government’s ability to monitor millions of phone calls and e-mail messages going in and out of the United States.
They also said that the new law for the first time provided a legal framework for much of the surveillance without warrants that was being conducted in secret by the National Security Agency and outside the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the 1978 law that is supposed to regulate the way the government can listen to the private communications of American citizens.
“This more or less legalizes the N.S.A. program,” said Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies in Washington, who has studied the new legislation.

The law also gave the administration greater power to force telecommunications companies to cooperate with such spying operations. The companies can now be compelled to cooperate by orders from the attorney general and the director of national intelligence.
Democratic Congressional aides said Sunday that some telecommunications company officials had told Congressional leaders that they were unhappy with that provision in the bill and might challenge the new law in court. The aides said the telecommunications companies had told lawmakers that they would rather have a court-approved warrant ordering them to comply.
In fact, pressure from the telecommunications companies on the Bush administration has apparently played a major hidden role in the political battle over the surveillance issue over the past few months.

Posted by: b | Aug 6 2007 5:33 utc | 21

Even tha WaPo’s Fred Hiatt editorial is blaming the Democrats for letting this pass: Warrantless Surrender

The government will now be free to intercept any communications believed to be from outside the United States (including from Americans overseas) that involve “foreign intelligence” — not just terrorism. It will be able to monitor phone calls and e-mails of U.S. citizens or residents without warrants — unless the subject is the “primary target” of the surveillance. Instead of having the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court ensure that surveillance is being done properly, with monitoring of Americans minimized, that job would be up to the attorney general and the director of national intelligence. The court’s role is reduced to that of rubber stamp.

Democrats could have stuck to their guns and insisted on their version. Instead, nervous about being blamed for any terrorist attack and eager to get out of town, they accepted the unacceptable. Most Democrats opposed the measure, but enough (16 in the Senate, 41 in the House) went with Republicans to allow it to pass, and the leadership enabled that result.

Posted by: b | Aug 6 2007 6:20 utc | 22

b, #13 , berlin.. cool

Posted by: annie | Aug 6 2007 6:46 utc | 23

so, based on participation on this and other sites, now with the FISA law and the recent executive order about confiscating assets of those hindering the “progress of democracy in iraq” does that mean that the guvmint can now legally read my emails (since i am communicating with someone overseas) and conclude that it can legally take all 2 cents i have in the bank?
marty lederman’s observation about it starting with the repubs and then supported by the complicity of the dems is chilling.
don’t know about the rest of you guys, but i’m not going down without a fight. i don’t believe enough will join me in the streets – to comfy to sit at home and blog – but i will try one last method on the inside. impeachment. jerry nadler is my rep and he is not going to get much rest on his august recess. his constitutents are like a hornets’ nest and FISA was the big stick that hit it.

Posted by: conchita | Aug 6 2007 16:21 utc | 24

does that mean that the guvmint can now legally read my emails (since i am communicating with someone overseas) and conclude that it can legally take all 2 cents i have in the bank?
In an installment of simple answers to simple questions: Yes.

Posted by: b | Aug 6 2007 16:47 utc | 25

thanks, b @25. my question was actually rhetorical, but your response made me wonder about executive orders and where they stand in the hierarchy of law. are they equal to legislative action? can they be defeated by judicial or legislative action? (not that after our FISA weekend that is something worth considering.)

Posted by: conchita | Aug 6 2007 17:05 utc | 26

executive orders and where they stand in the hierarchy of law. are they equal to legislative action? can they be defeated by judicial or legislative action
An executive order is not law:

The President also has broad powers to issue executive orders. An executive order is a directive from the President to other officials in the executive branch.

But the executive, i.e. federal agencies, FBI etc., have to follow it.

Rules may be challenged in federal court.
The federal courts have sole authority to review agency rules and
actions to ensure they are legal under the substantive federal statute.

Well, the executive order says to take all your money away. The treasury will do so.
How will you pay a lawyer?
The executive order says anybody who helps you with funds or otherwise will also have his/her money taken away.
Still looking for a lawyer?
Anyway, if you indeed find one and somehow are able to challenge the order in court, it will take some three years to five years to go through the process (and remember who put in the judges and prosecuters).
What will you eat these three to five years? Where will you sleep? Are still thinking about helping the opposition in Lebanon or Iraq?
Think Senator Webb will rescue you? Ooops …

Posted by: b | Aug 6 2007 17:31 utc | 27

thanks, b. your scenario will be helpful in a meeting with jerry nadler. i was thinking larger than a small fry like me – like an aclu action or a higher profile individual who would have others to turn to for financial assistance and garner media attention – or about congress writing legislation to counter it. yes, i know the likelihood given they just caved, but i can’t believe they are all that stupid or craven. nadler has always been big on civil rights and i have been shocked he has been unwilling to take up the impeachment call. something tells me there is a chance. i’m not giving up yet.
interesting comment from talkleft about FISA:

There are two Constitutional issues here, only one of which is the Fourth Amendment. The other is the issue whether Congress could assert any authority in an area which the Executive claimed as its exclusive province: the “unitary executive” theory to wiretap non-US persons without Congressional authorization. I don’t for a minute believe this theory held any water but by asking for and now accepting and signing this bill into law, Bush I say has capitulated on that theory. It should now be settled that the executive cannot wiretap anybody, including non US citizens even people speaking between Berlin and Ankara without Congressional authority.
Having settled this principle, it now remains to be settled whether even Congress has the authority to approve the invasion of an American citizen’s Fourth Amendment rights without a warrant where it is incidental a foreign surveillance. I am disgusted by Congress in having caved to Bush but I remain cautuously hopeful that they may have gained a strategic victory in having approved this bill.

seems hard to believe that the dems would have been strategic in this, but one can hope.

Posted by: conchita | Aug 6 2007 18:08 utc | 28

but one can hope
which is not a plan.
Sorry to bite on you Conchita, but the mess is obvious. It were the congressional leaders who let this happen – Reid and Pelosi. There was no need for a floor vote. There was no need to let this move out of committees.. They Dem leaders did engineer to let this happen the way it played out while shielding themselves.
That talk-left commentator has obviously not read the law, nor much of an idea of how the “unitary executive” is really played.

Posted by: b | Aug 6 2007 18:52 utc | 29

b, i am not one to argue that there is a mess here. i was once the only person not seasick on a 50′ boat dismasted in the middle of the gulf stream and being tossed around like a toothpick by 45′ seas and winds gusting to 40. partially refusal to panic, partially the realization that giving up and giving in wasn’t going to get us out of the storm. like then, i will do what i can to keep the bilge from flooding and my eyes on the horizon for rescue during my watch. for me that translates into lobbying my rep who is one of the good guys and hoping he sees the writing on the wall and is cleverer and tougher than they are. i will make the phone calls, stand up this tuesday, protest this wednesday, schedule the meetings with him, working inside and outside. yes, it’s a fucking mess, but i’m not going down without a fight.

Posted by: conchita | Aug 6 2007 19:06 utc | 30

There is a new movement in Berlin. People steal the air from all four tires (not by hurting the tires) of SUV’s and leave memos on how to conserve energy.

In Stockholm those memos are signed by “Asfaltsdjungelns indianer”, roughly: The Indians of the Concrete Jungle.

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Aug 6 2007 23:18 utc | 31

hmmm, somebody in my leetle pacific town is drivin’ around in a fookin’ Hummer….

Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 7 2007 3:42 utc | 32

oops, c’est moi. that period cache cleansing….

Posted by: catlady | Aug 7 2007 3:44 utc | 33

surprised nobody linked to this powerful narrative from arthur silber — who really does get it — yet
Blinded by the Story: Liberals and Progressives as Political Creationists

Posted by: b real | Aug 7 2007 4:08 utc | 34

Same Agencies to Run, Oversee Surveillance Program

The Bush administration plans to leave oversight of its expanded foreign eavesdropping program to the same government officials who supervise the surveillance activities and to the intelligence personnel who carry them out, senior government officials said yesterday.
The law, which permits intercepting Americans’ calls and e-mails without a warrant if the communications involve overseas transmission, gives Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales responsibility for creating the broad procedures determining whose telephone calls and e-mails are collected. It also gives McConnell and Gonzales the role of assessing compliance with those procedures.
The law, signed Sunday by President Bush after being pushed through the Senate and House over the weekend, does not contain provisions for outside oversight — unlike an earlier House measure that called for audits every 60 days by the Justice Department’s inspector general.

Posted by: b | Aug 7 2007 7:09 utc | 35

Apparently, even NYT, WaPo &&& USA Today ripped x-Dems & Repugs for passing this bill. Horrifyingly Sen. Barbara Boxer, one of the most liberal Senators, did not oppose it. (She ducked out.) Feinstein, member in good standing of CFR Did Support it. Does that mean that CFR supported it???

Posted by: jj | Aug 7 2007 16:31 utc | 36