Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 6, 2007
The Credit Party is Over

About a year ago I wrote The Bush Boom Party is Over:

The U.S. housing bubble is popping. Interest rates are up and will not go down soon. Many people who recently signed Adjustable Rate Mortgages will learn that they can not afford their houses. But by then housing markets will be down and foreclosure will come. More offers will further turn down the market prices. Construction workers will lose their jobs. Homebuilders will shut down.

This will get really nasty next year when $1 trillion in ARMs are in for readjustment. Finally the Bush boom party is over.

And here we are. Financial markets are in a mess. Nouriel Roubini argues, that there is serious danger that this is a systemic crisis and not only a temporary hickup.

Interest rates rose and the credit quality of marginal, interest only, no money down, new homeowners turned out to be worse than the guys with rosy glasses expected. The lenders certified models of rating their leveraged portfolios of mortgage backed securities turned out to be as good as the lunatic business models of some pet-food selling Internet companies in 1999/2000. Some of these lenders are now going belly-up, but the effects will spread further.

Shills like Greenspan have lauded instruments like mortgage backed securities and collateral backed securities (car loans etc. packed into sellable securities) as helpful for spreading risk. As it turns out now these instruments have rather hidden risk and the agencies that rated these risks were, just as during the 2000 Internet bubble, simply self interested sales people.

As banks get cautious and survey their losses, they are suddenly unwilling to give more easy credit to homeowners. There is also no more credit available for leveraged buyout deals in the corporate market. Without that demand current equity prices seem overrated and will have to decline, thereby further deminishing capital otherwise available for lending.

There are some 7 million people in the U.S. who have taken out Adjustable Rate Mortgages that will reset in the coming month and require significant higher interest (and risk premium) payments.

This is far from over.

CNBC’s Wall Street shill Jim Cramer is flipping out on camera (recommended annotated version here) calling for Bernanke to start the helicopters, to drop money onto the banks that are in trouble and to lower interest rates.

Will Bernanke do so? Not yet, but he eventually will have to because of political pressure. But this will likely be too little to late and only lead to higher inflation and a lower dollar (and higher gas prices) without stopping the fall out from the crisis.

The U.S. is not the only country in trouble. There are popping housing bubbles in the UK and in Spain too. The credit crunch will be felt in equity markets world wide. It’s hard to tell when and where this might stop.

Personally I don’t expect this coming recession to be a mild one.

Comments

I have a question, for anyone who might be able to answer. How tightly wound are the credit institutions and the housing bubbles in different countries? Or to put it another way: how fast will the popping spread?

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Aug 6 2007 14:15 utc | 1

Although German banks are a lot stodgier than US or UK banks in granting unlimited loans to anybody with a measureable pulse, the German financial markets will be seriously affected by any sort of bubbles bursting over the globe.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 6 2007 14:19 utc | 2

@askod –
1. “how tightly wound” – very difficult to say as there is absolutly NO transparency in all of this.
The people who gave loans to the homeowners bundled and repacked these loans into MBSs. These were rated “to model”, not “to market” and sold to anybody who would buy these.
Many of these buyers have been hedgefonds who themselfs were thin of capital and had borrowed themself from the business banks (up to $10 borrowed for every $1 of their own capital). If their MBS holding declines by 10%, the hedge font is bankrupt and the business bank sits there with some MBS packages of dubious value. Likely that dubious value is much lower then what they assume (see Bear Stearns) as nobody will want to buy that stuff.
It is essentially unknown who owns how much of the MBSs and CDOs, how leveraged the owners are and who they borrowed from. This may popp all over the place. Some banks will not disclose their losses until the must in their next yearly filling. Some will hide them in subsidiaries.
The last issue may delay the popping a bit from coming up in the headlines. Watching Cramer flipping out seems to tell that there is a lot of trouble that is unknown to the public yet.
I’d give it two to three years until the popping is over. But the effects from that popping will spread and to heal that takes longer (remember how long it took for Japan to heal their financial markets after they popped in the Asian crisis)
This was a 20+ year credit bubble induced by Alan Greenspan. It may take 10+ years to unwind.
@ralphieboy – one German bank, IKB, already had to be “saved” by some other banks here. More will follow. But some banks here were also smart in this. Looks like Deutsche Bank made a killing by betting that this popp will happen.

Posted by: b | Aug 6 2007 14:45 utc | 3

A lowball forecast has been that 2-2 1/2 million people will lose their homes in the next 6-12 months.

Posted by: R.L. | Aug 6 2007 14:57 utc | 4

As I don’t live in the States, could some people here give us some “from the grounds” impressions? Thanks.

Posted by: b | Aug 6 2007 15:26 utc | 5

I think the real estate markets vary immensely depending on location. I’ve been talking to some realtors and house inspectors in my town (small university city in Orygun) and they say our local market is not overpriced and not in danger of a meltdown. We’ll see. I’m thinking about selling my house–but I have the advantage of proximity to the U, in a student rental neighborhood. I think it will be easier for me to sell than to find something else that I can afford. I want something smaller, and those get snapped up very quickly.
Annie, you would have a much better perspective on the city scene.

Posted by: catlady | Aug 6 2007 16:30 utc | 6

via Artrios
– another one bites the dust: American Home Files for Bankruptcy After Shutdown

Aug. 6 (Bloomberg) — American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. filed for bankruptcy protection, becoming the second- biggest residential lender in the U.S. to close down this year.
The filing adds to signs that late payments have spread to homeowners with good credit. American Home sought federal court protection today in Wilmington, Delaware, with assets of more than $20.6 billion and debt of more than $19.3 billion. The company said Aug. 2 it would halt operations, and has reduced staff to 1,000 from about 7,400 people at the end of 2006.
American Home specialized in mortgages for people who fall just short of top credit scores. More than half a dozen competitors have declared bankruptcy this year as defaults spilled over from “subprime” borrowers with the worst repayment records to those with more reliable payment histories.
“Their sources of funding have all dried up,” said Mark Power, a lawyer advising some of the more than 100,000 creditors. “This case is going to be very similar to New Century.”

– and the Fed is bickering and doesn’t (yet) want to gush out more money to the robber barons. Poole Says Subprime Investors Deserved to Lose Money

July 20 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President William Poole said investors who lost money buying subprime mortgage-linked securities got what they deserved.
Poole criticized the underwriting standards and interest- rate assessments of Wall Street and endorsed the Fed’s steps to strengthen consumer safeguards. His remarks come after Chairman Ben S. Bernanke committed to tougher rules to protect consumers during his semiannual monetary policy testimony this week.
“The punishment has been meted out to those who have done misdeeds and made bad judgments,” Poole told reporters in St. Louis after a speech on the market for mortgages to borrowers with sketchy or weak credit histories. “We are getting good evidence that the companies and hedge funds that are being hit are the ones who deserve it.”
Poole said that the meltdown isn’t spreading to the broader financial services industry. His confidence didn’t prevent Treasury notes extending their rally, pushing the yield on the benchmark 10-year note to a six-week low.

Not that the alst one is two weeks old and there are signs now that this spreading to other markets. With more pressure Poole and Bernanke will have to pull back.

Posted by: b | Aug 6 2007 17:07 utc | 7

“As I don’t live in the States, could some people here give us some “from the grounds” impressions? Thanks.”
I can tell you about the Las Vegas market first hand. Houses in my neighborhood are selling for 2004 prices…less if you adjust for inflation. There was quite an appreciation between 2004-2005, all of which has now disappeared. Since some 1 in 70 houses is in foreclosure, there is no reason why further price drops wont occur.

Posted by: Lysander | Aug 6 2007 18:34 utc | 8

Around here (Seattle area) some bad nerves, but prices are holding & houses are selling — my mother in law just sold her house for asking price in 2 days.

Posted by: anna missed | Aug 6 2007 18:45 utc | 9

my brother in connecticut sold his place very quickly for asking price – just a 1 br condo and for probably about $225k. a friend here in nyc has two offers on a 600 sq.ft. apartment which she expects to sell for about $675k. my father is a director of a small massachusetts bank and they decided a few years ago not to offer ARMs or other subprime products – they didn’t want to find themselves foreclosing on neighbors and customers supporting local businesses. i wil ask him if they have seen their foreclosure rate trend up even without the subprimes.
interesting take on cramer’s friday melt down – with subtitles translating what lies beneath the hysteria.

Posted by: conchita | Aug 6 2007 18:54 utc | 10

Annie, you would have a much better perspective on the city scene.
ahh, i am probably the wrong person to ask because i have limited comprehension of how all this works. wish billmon would chime in. seattle is, so far fairly secure w/its housing market but that doesn’t mean people there didn’t take out those loans. i am still reeling from watching ‘maxed out.’ it seems like there is some plan to turn us all into indentured servants.
i’m in marin now and just had an almost surreal conversation w/a banker. i found out my line of credit (which i have had for what seems like forever) was closed because they have time limits (10 years) which i totally forgot about. so.. i try to reapply because i do use mine on occasion, much better than credit cards which i don’t use. since i am living here now i applied for this property (the old one was opened in arizona when i was living there). so… i get a call this morning i have been refused. why? i don’t have enough income to credit ratio. weird.
so i say to the guy, you know i am not in a desperate situation so this news is not going to break me but it does seem odd that i have a home here (marin is the 2nd highest property values in the nation) that i bought almost 30 ago that i owe nothing on, and you won’t give me a line of credit that would be a first and only loan against the property??
my first shock was when i applied for the loan and found out the old standard (40 grand) no longer applied. if you want to get any sort of decent rate you have to apply for 250,000!!!!! totally weird. to have the convenience of using this loan to pay a property tax payment coming due or whatever bill one might have on a bad month i need to apply for a 250,000 loan? what a recipe for disaster.
then he tells me that last year i skipped a payment (on the old line of credit)and that made me a bad risk. huh? a $50 payment?? my balance is so low i just spaced it and didn’t consider the consequence.
so i say to the guy, i am not sweating bullets over this but it seems draconian. they are closing their doors to people. they are not offering ways out for any of these people who took out those ARMS. i think this is the crux of the matter that is driving their greed, and he knew it. he said the rules prohibit him. he is here in marin and he knows what property values are here. well, so much for having a line of credit anymore. the rates for a smaller loan are so absurdly high i may as well just use a credit card. i guess that is the point. i will have to make cuts somewhere. thank goodness clay is still cheap.
sheesh

Posted by: annie | Aug 6 2007 19:02 utc | 11

From the US–Northeast:
Across the street a condo has been on the market for six months. If I told you how much he is asking for a dinky suite in the third floor of a one-time single-family house, you’d laugh out loud.
Local mortgage companies have been dropping like flies, but many people remain steadfastly in la-la land. One of my friends has been trying to sell, and I have in essence suggested that she cut and run, but it does not sound like she is ready to do that. It sounds like she is lagging the market down instead of leading it and exiting. She rode the LAST housing bubble burst right to the bottom; I can only hope this time she will choose to get out sooner.

Posted by: Gaianne | Aug 6 2007 19:20 utc | 12

From the US–Northeast:
Across the street a condo has been on the market for six months. If I told you how much he is asking for a dinky suite in the third floor of a one-time single-family house, you’d laugh out loud.
Local mortgage companies have been dropping like flies, but many people remain steadfastly in la-la land. One of my friends has been trying to sell, and I have in essence suggested that she cut and run, but it does not sound like she is ready to do that. It sounds like she is lagging the market down instead of leading it and exiting. She rode the LAST housing bubble burst right to the bottom; I can only hope this time she will choose to get out sooner.

Posted by: Gaianne | Aug 6 2007 19:21 utc | 13

I certainly agree w/annie, in that that is exactly what they want… indentured servants.
Anyway, I highly recommend this if you have the time and before it’s removed…MAXED_OUT

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 6 2007 20:53 utc | 14

Thought this might belong here…
Revolution Happens

Humanity is rapidly approaching a crossroads, where we will begin cooperating on a scale that we never have before, or we will descend into a state of warring tribes like we have never seen before. Appeals to the conscience only work on those willing to listen, while it is the less altruistic who need to pay the most attention. If there is one thing that does get people’s attention, it’s the money.
In 1996, Bob Dole had a campaign slogan, “We want you to keep more of your money in your pocket.” The first thought to cross my mind was, ‘Thank God it’s not my money, or it would be worthless.’ The logic of this is that the actual currency doesn’t belong to the holder, only its value. The monetary system is a function of government, which in a democracy is the people. Therefore money is actually a form of public commons, similar to a public road system. Instead of transportation, it’s a system of economic exchange. While you are in total possession of the section of road you’re driving on, its value is due to it being connected to those everyone else is on. So is the value of the money in your pocket due to its broad interchangeability. It is not an issue of socializing wealth, but of understanding what money is to begin with. Your home, business, car, etc. are private property, but the roads linking them are not. Money is more like the public road system, than private property. It provides a broad economic connectivity, without which the economy could not function.
Money has always been a form of public utility (Render unto Caesar…), but because it evolved out of barter and for much of history was minted out of precious metals to gave it inherent value, the issue of function has been confused with the issue of possession. Now all monetary value is a matter of public trust in government accountability and this is being abused to the breaking point. It was only a generation ago that the wealth of governments were still symbolized, if not based on the gold in the treasury. For many countries, it’s now how much US dollars and debt they are holding. This is not a stable situation. When the liquidity bubble does burst, faith in the concept of printed money will be shaken to its core. In order to restore faith in an invaluable economic tool, it would be useful to emphasize this public function. There is no longer a gold standard and it is the taxpayer who bears ultimate responsibility for government obligations.
Here is a little history to consider in understanding why we are where we are.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 6 2007 21:04 utc | 15

Here’s a treat…
The Realist_, #41 (June 1963)
negative thinking
by Robert Anton Wilson
New article available via the Realist archive project – “Is capitalism a revealed religion?”
Keep you doped with religion and sex and tv And you think you’re so clever and classless and free
But you’re still fucking peasants as far as I can see
” -John Lennon

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 6 2007 23:36 utc | 16

roubini is a huckster. he’s not interested in anything save his proprietary “advice.”

Posted by: slothrop | Aug 7 2007 4:34 utc | 17

as a matter of fact, if you can’t pay $7500 for his advice, why cite him at all?

Posted by: slothrop | Aug 7 2007 4:37 utc | 18

NYT Editorial: Pensions and the Mortgage Mess

There is a real danger that the casualties to come will include a more vulnerable set of investors: the pension plans of working Americans. Mr. Bernanke recently told Congress, “In most cases, I think that pension funds should probably not, you know, go heavily into these types of instruments.”
But faced with growing numbers of retirees, some pensions — including those for police and firefighters in Ohio and Dallas — have been unable to resist making these risky investments in an attempt to increase their returns. Public and private pension funds have also plowed tens of billions into hedge funds, which have been piling into mortgage-related securities.
Many pension plans lack the analytical skills needed to evaluate these investments, relying on outside advisers and rating agencies. But the stellar triple-A rating assigned to many of these bonds proved to be misleading — with the agencies now rushing to downgrade them.
So far there have been no reports of pension plans in trouble because of the mess in the mortgage market, but we fear that it might only be a matter of time.

Posted by: b | Aug 7 2007 4:44 utc | 19

there is a global real estate “bubble.” this will hurt more than “american pensioners.”

Posted by: slothrop | Aug 7 2007 5:07 utc | 20

In Australia we have already played out our property boom and bust. The peak was about 2004.
Things to note:
The last locations to recieve the boom are the first to fall back down again. If you want to know where is going to bit first and hardest look at the areas that started to rise most recently. They probably also rose very quickly too.
There will be alot of very large real estate ventures (essentially new apartment blocks) that fall apart as their foundations turn out to be dodgy. These will take years to play out. Also new apartments will generally be the most vulnerable to drops in prices. They’re very dependent on rising property values to be economically viable.
The actual number of people in mortgage stress is less than you’d think. The only significant group in potentially disastrous situations are first home buyers who bought at the peak. As a percentage of the market this group is not that big, and only the ones suffering income stress as well as mortgage stress will actually sell. The rest will ride it out because people with negative equity just don’t sell unless they absolutely have to. All the non peak non first home buyers had an increase in equity in their existing properties to offset any losses they are going to experience.
Most genuinely wealthy areas are relatively unaffected. Sort of the flip side of increasing inequality. They’ll have a growth pause, not a collapse.

Posted by: swio | Aug 7 2007 5:13 utc | 21

File, file, crocodile:
Bear Stearns hedge funds file for bankruptcy in the Caymans, rather than New York, where its assets are, in order to limit “investors’ ability to get their money back.” (Bloomberg, Aug 7).
According to the article, 75% of hedge funds worldwide are registered in the Caymans.
And Enron had 600 “offshore vehicles” registered there.

Posted by: Dismal Science | Aug 7 2007 9:40 utc | 22

So, Rich Boys, how dja like “globalization” now?????

Posted by: jj | Aug 7 2007 16:24 utc | 23

I can’t afford my wife.” 25 Anonymous Money Confessions A photo essay courtesy of the Personal Finance Advice blog.
So many of them are assholes!
It’s refreshingly honest, I suppose.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 8 2007 2:56 utc | 24

FT’s John Dizard: Univ Chicago = “the Qom of monetary economics”. Ha ha!
Read it here.

Posted by: Dismal Science | Aug 8 2007 10:11 utc | 25

Jerome has a good diary of the credit crunch.

Posted by: b | Aug 8 2007 10:15 utc | 26

The Chinese might get serious in restrickting the empire …
China threatens ‘nuclear option’ of dollar sales

Two officials at leading Communist Party bodies have given interviews in recent days warning – for the first time – that Beijing may use its $1.33 trillion (£658bn) of foreign reserves as a political weapon to counter pressure from the US Congress.
Shifts in Chinese policy are often announced through key think tanks and academies.
Described as China’s “nuclear option” in the state media, such action could trigger a dollar crash at a time when the US currency is already breaking down through historic support levels.

Xia Bin, finance chief at the Development Research Centre (which has cabinet rank), kicked off what now appears to be government policy with a comment last week that Beijing’s foreign reserves should be used as a “bargaining chip” in talks with the US.

The threats play into the presidential electoral campaign of Hillary Clinton, who has called for restrictive legislation to prevent America being “held hostage to economic decicions being made in Beijing, Shanghai, or Tokyo”.

A bill drafted by a group of US senators, and backed by the Senate Finance Committee, calls for trade tariffs against Chinese goods as retaliation for alleged currency manipulation.

Yes, Hillary, “held hostage” is quite right – and no chance to escape but through massive inflation …

Posted by: b | Aug 9 2007 6:40 utc | 27

Now France’s biggest bank has joined the chorus of ‘We have no idea how much this CDO/CLO/triple AAA+ rated leveraged thingy is worth.’
As John Dizard noted in Monday’s FT (cited above):

What we saw last month [July] was a toy trainset model of what is in store for us with the unwinding of the great credit bubble.

How are your gold futures holding up, b?

Posted by: Dismal Science | Aug 9 2007 13:04 utc | 28

How are your gold futures holding up, b?
Don’t have any in the moment – too much volatility in the markets right now to do anything, so I am mostly in cash (and some real bullion stashed away).
The German Dax went up 1.5% yesterday – it is down some 2.5 today – a wild ride … anyone with leveraged options is likely roadkill for now …

Posted by: b | Aug 9 2007 13:48 utc | 29