Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 16, 2007
Slaughter in the Markets

There will be some slaughter in the markets
today. As Nouriel Roubini explains:

[T]oday any wealthy individual can take $1 million and go to a prime broker and leverage this amount three times; then the resulting $4 million ($1 equity and $3 debt) can be invested in a fund of funds that will in turn leverage these $4 millions three or four times and invest them in a hedge fund; then the hedge fund will take these funds and leverage them three or four times and buy some very junior tranche of a CDO that is itself levered nine or ten times. At the end of this credit chain, the initial $1 million of equity becomes a $100 million investment out of which $99 million is debt (leverage) and only $1 million is equity. So we got an overall leverage ratio of 100 to 1.

Then, even a small 1% fall in the price of the final investment (CDO) wipes out the initial capital and creates a chain of margin calls that unravel this debt house of cards. This unraveling of a Minskian Ponzi credit scheme is exactly what is happening right now in financial markets.

When a bank calls a debtor, be it a hedge fund or some individual, and tells it to pony up more cash or its overextended credit line will be cut off immediately, the debtor will have to sell some stuff out of its portfolio.

The stuff then sold is usually unrelated to the original credit problem. A fund with credit problems because of some leveraged mortgage papers will not get any good price for these right now. But it may also have some GE shares that are still near their purchase value. Those will now be sold just to regain some cash that can support its credit line.

General stocks and speculative commodities like oil are falling as more and more funds need to sell out. Bad economic news like decade low housing starts reenforce the downtrend. The falling value of general stocks leads to overextentions of other debtors with leveraged derivatives, who then have to start selling too.

From there on it really gets interesting …

All of this is was not unforseen. In his 2002(!) letter to investors Warren Buffett wrote (pdf) about derivatives (p12ff), leveraged financial instruments, and linkage which are both major parts of the current unraveling:

Charlie and I are of one mind in how we feel about derivatives and the trading activities that go with them: We view them as time bombs, both for the parties that deal in them and the economic system.

[…]
Derivatives [..] create a daisy-chain risk that is akin to the risk run by insurers or reinsurers that lay
off much of their business with others. In both cases, huge receivables from many counterparties tend to
build up over time. […] A participant may see himself as prudent, believing his large credit
exposures to be diversified and therefore not dangerous. Under certain circumstances, though, an exogenous
event that causes the receivable from Company A to go bad will also affect those from Companies B through
Z. History teaches us that a crisis often causes problems to correlate in a manner undreamed of in more
tranquil times.

[…]
Large amounts of risk, particularly credit risk, have become concentrated in the hands of relatively few derivatives dealers, who in addition trade extensively with one other. The troubles of one could quickly infect the others. On top of that, these dealers are owed huge amounts by non-dealer counterparties. Some of these counterparties, as I’ve mentioned, are linked in ways that could cause them to contemporaneously run into a problem because of a single event […] Linkage, when it suddenly surfaces, can trigger serious systemic problems.

[…]
The derivatives genie is now well out of the bottle, and these instruments will almost certainly
multiply in variety and number until some event makes their toxicity clear. […] [T]he derivatives business
continues to expand unchecked. Central banks and governments have so far found no effective way to
control, or even monitor, the risks posed by these contracts.

Charlie and I believe Berkshire should be a fortress of financial strength – for the sake of our
owners, creditors, policyholders and employees. We try to be alert to any sort of megacatastrophe risk, and
that posture may make us unduly apprehensive about the burgeoning quantities of long-term derivatives
contracts and the massive amount of uncollateralized receivables that are growing alongside. In our view,
however, derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are
potentially lethal.

Comments

Subprime loans grew in ’06, Fannie says

Fannie Mae (Charts), the nation’s largest source of home loan funding, increased its share of risky subprime loans through 2006, although to a smaller degree than other institutions, the company said Thursday.

About 12 percent of the company’s single-family book of business was higher-risk Alt-A mortgages as of the end of June, Fannie Mae said. About 2.2 percent of its book was subprime as of the end of June.
The company said it expects to see higher delinquencies and credit losses this year compared with 2006 and that it faces concentration risk as other mortgage industry companies fail, which should shift business to Fannie Mae.

Why did Fanny, which sells US taxpayer guaranteed mortgage bonds, “invest” in subprime at all???

Posted by: b | Aug 16 2007 14:12 utc | 1

Minsky and Ponzi, together at last!
Eugene Linden on CDOs as a form of “fiat currency” collapse, Aug 15:

Assured by Triple-A ratings that these instruments were money good and completely liquid, bankers thought they had discovered the philosopher’s stone – a risk-free, high-yielding asset – and this new credit/money has found its way into every corner of the financial system from teacher’s pensions to commercial paper to money market funds. Moreover, once the printers of this new fiat currency realized that there was an appetite for their product among yield-starved institutional investors, they did what every unrestrained ruler with a printing press has done since the dawn of money: they began minting more of it.
In this case, credit/money was inflated through the re-securitization of already securitized assets. The Mugabes of hyperinflation in this case were the rocket scientists in structured finance, and the Zimbabwian extreme are so-called synthetic CDOs, arcane confections which invest in tranches of CDOs. [emphasis added] These “innovations” leverage the underlying subprime assets to dizzying multiples so that tens of billions of dollars in subprime originations might ultimately support of a trillion dollars in CDO tranches. At the tail end of this whip, tiny variances from the assumptions about the performance of the underlying assets can vaporize the value of these supposedly rock solid assets.
This new fiat currency exploded during the period of skyrocketing home price appreciation, but it should be noted that almost everything worked during that period. What securitizers and holders are discovering, however, is that a fiat currency rests on nothing more than the willingness of someone else to accept it. And, now that the market, most ominously the vast commercial paper market, has discovered that credit is not money, the contraction has begun. The question of the moment is whether anything can be done to slow it, much less stop it?

Posted by: Dismal Science | Aug 16 2007 15:58 utc | 2

Nasdaq Gives High Rollers A Market Free Of Regulation
“Any private firm can list on Nasdaq’s new platform, which is called the Portal Market, and raise money by selling stock to an elite group of shareholders. These companies would remain private and not have to make public their financial statements or submit to federal regulation, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate accountability law.”
WaPo, Aug. 14 2007

Posted by: Tangerine (ex Noirette) | Aug 16 2007 16:29 utc | 3

@Tangerine
That’s the next scam. In a few years the “elite share holders” (minimum $100 million) will have build a bubble and then mutal funds, funded by small investors and proded by politicians will buy into that bubble and will get slaughter in a totally unregulated market.
Rinse, repeat …

Posted by: b | Aug 16 2007 16:47 utc | 4

Incidentally,

Net overall capital inflows into the United States dropped to $58.8 billion in June from May’s revised inflow of $107.3 billion, hurt by a plunge in net purchases of U.S. securities by private investors.
June’s net overall capital inflow barely covered the U.S. trade deficit for the month, which was $58.1 billion.
(snip)

Posted by: Alamet | Aug 16 2007 16:57 utc | 5

I just hate it when I’m confronted with doom. And I don’t even have any champagne for my eviction party. I once saw a TV report covering the Siege of Sarajevo, where a remarkably cheerful old man joked about the vegetables he was growing on the windowsills of his high rise. They were all that kept him alive. “Beans are short, tomatoes are high”, he beamed, as he showed off his little crop.

Posted by: Copeland | Aug 16 2007 16:58 utc | 6

Here’s a MUST LISTEN rundown on ec. situation, in English that’s even comprehensible by economic/financial illiterates. Interview recorded Aug. 3.
From Cold War to Class War
Interview with financial economist and historian, Dr. Michael Hudson. Liquidity crisis in the banking system; wiping out of credit; demise of the dollar; stock volatility; hedge funds; sub- prime lending, real estate tax versus labor tax, etc. Dr. Hudson has [just] been appointed Chief Economic Advisor for the Kucinich for President campaign, and is writing a new tax policy for the United States. He is President of The Institute for the Study of Long-Term Economic Trend, a Wall Street Financial Analyst, Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City and author of “Super-Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire”.

He also tells us that ~Aug. 1, Sen. Schumer announced that it’s Dem. policy that those of us w/little should be paying at least twice as much in taxes as those who’ve stolen everything. He said their plan is that we bail out Wall St. & the Rich. How? They will impose 90% tax rate on us.
So, I hope Everyone Spreads the Word on this Pronto. This has to be the Center of Discussion – re-writing tax policy to re-industrialize Am. & allow us to feed ourselves, rather than continuing these suicidal, parasitical policies of Wall St. At the end, he discusses how the new class war is the Financial Sector (incl. Real Estate & Insurance) against everyone else.
THIS IS SIMPLEST MOST COMPREHENSIVE COHERENT APPROACH I’VE HEARD TO MAKING SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE.
************** ENJOY *************
Far more helpful to have teach-ins around the country discussing this, than some vast mass of writhing miserable muted mass…
Only weakness is he isn’t asked about oil situation.

Posted by: jj | Aug 16 2007 21:08 utc | 7

Interesting interview jj.
One thing that I hadn’t appreciated about the mortgage re-financing train wreck is its timing relative to elections. Defaults will peak between March and June 2008, unsold housing between June and December. Housing prices, construction and consumer spending will presumably be hitting bottom sometime in there, and now I expect a recession. Not exactly an encouraging environment for an election.
The first party/candidate to effectively critique the development of this disaster, and to make their analysis stick with voters, will reap a huge amount of support come election time. This may be Kucinich’s attempt in that direction. I expect this issue to dominate the final election this time around, because it will directly affect so many. It’s probably not far enough along yet to affect the primaries though.
I like Kucinich.

Posted by: PeeDee | Aug 17 2007 3:32 utc | 8

I should say that the Demopublicans will try very hard to blame the Muslims, Iranians, Chinese, Hippies etc for this situation in various ways. Traditional Democrats are arguably just as responsible as Repug’s, and will of course fulfill their role as scapegoats rather than try and actually overhaul the system as Kucinich is calling for.

Posted by: PeeDee | Aug 17 2007 3:39 utc | 9

PeeDee, what do you think of his proposals?
Doesn’t matter who you blame if you’re imposing a 90% income tax. Presumably that’s why xDems. going along w/all the Police State Measures.
Since he’s putting together a Team of Business People & Academics to develop the plan, I’m hoping they round up even more to blanket the Nation, both liberal talk radio & teach-ins.

Posted by: jj | Aug 17 2007 4:35 utc | 10

Bernanke started the helicopter: Fed cuts discount rate

The Federal Reserve, reacting to concerns about the subprime lending crisis that’s rocked financial markets in recent weeks, Friday cut its so-called discount rate half a percentage point, to 5.75 percent.
The discount rate, the rate the Federal Reserve charges qualified lenders, mainly banks, for temporary loans, is largely symbolic. The central bank did not change its more closely watched federal funds rate, which affects credit cards, home equity lines of credit, car loans and other consumer loan rates. That rate remains at 5.25 percent.

There will be more steps like this as the crisis is far from over.
Net effect: bailing out those with losses and debt by creating inflation that will make everybody pay for it. That may not work this time …

Posted by: b | Aug 17 2007 15:23 utc | 11

jj @ 7
Thanks for the KPFA link and the Hudson interview.
b, and others –
What is your take on the yen carry trade?
Elaine’s is

… The engine of this month’s banking collapse was from China because the yen is now growing stronger and all central banks but China are frantically trying to reset the situation so that it goes back to the previous status quo but this is impossible because China is retaliating against the G7 for trying to force the yuan up while keeping the yen artificially low. Just look at these headlines!

The Bank of Japan working in concert with the exporters and powerhouses of Japan, moved heaven and earth to weaken the yen yesterday. They shoved it down a tiny bit but as I predicted…with stunning accuracy (I have to boast, I am the only person on earth to foresee this correctly) the Chinese countermanded that move and forced the yen up again. I would like to say to everyone, trying to reinstate the ‘carry trade’ that is killing the US industrial base and putting us deep in debt is important and we should thank the Chinese for doing this!

Whenever I hear the yen carry trade mentioned on teevee it’s as if this is a normal thing.

Posted by: Hamburger | Aug 17 2007 17:18 utc | 12

@Hamburger – an interesting take Elaine has there.
The Chinese/Japanes relation is very difficult in all aspects and the Chinese certainly would not mind to have that competitor in trouble. I haven’t looked deeper into that issue, but I will do now.
The “carry trade unwinding” is given in the media as reason for the increasing yen – doesn’t make much sense. Seen the other way around, rising yen kills carry trade, with the Chinese aspect added does make sense.
hmm …

Posted by: b | Aug 17 2007 17:49 utc | 13

Net effect: bailing out those with losses and debt by creating inflation that will make everybody pay for it. That may not work this time
There’s going to be a political effect which I haven’t seen mentioned yet (it might be on CNBC or Bloomberg but I’d shoot myself before plugging in a TV and watching those) — not everybody with losses and debt is going to get bailed out. That is, the people who took mortgages over their heads aren’t now magically going to get a chance to renegotiate them with a lender so they can keep the house; they’re just as screwed as ever. While most people don’t understand all the ins and outs of this mess, they understand that much. I have a feeling there’s going to be a backlash when everyone notices that the lenders and gamblers are going to get a cushioned fall while the ‘average joe’ is left to land on cement.
For all the talk about personal responsibility – and for all the similarities between the two parties, this is one genuine difference – the Republicans spew, it’s funny (funny strange, not funny haha) how often they manage to get bailed out on the public’s dime when they get themselves in trouble.
Along those lines, when will George Will and Robert Novak eat it in print, just a day or two after praising the Fed for the wisdom they were showing by not moving?

Posted by: mats | Aug 17 2007 18:50 utc | 14

Along those lines, when will George Will and Robert Novak eat it in print, just a day or two after praising the Fed for the wisdom they were showing by not moving?
Easy question – easy answer: Never – tomorrow they will laud the fed for bailing out the markets.
That said – and back to Hamburgers question:
There is a quite possible different answer to the cause of the Yen rise than the one in your link.
Hedge funds borrowed cheaply in Yen (0.5% interest), change that to US$ by selling the Yen and buying US$, and then bought US mortgage papers (MBS) that made 4-5% yield.
They pocketed the difference in yield.
Fine business as long as your MBS is stable. But what happens if you have to liquidate those because suddenly the don’t yield anything at all?
Well, try to get rid of that MBS stuff and as you sell those, try to get rid of that Yen loan that financed it too. So while selling MBS the counterdeal had to be eliminated too. The US$ had to be changed back to Yen to pay off the cheap Yen denominated loan too.
But as many tried to do this, i.e buy Yen, the demand for Yen did rise. The price of Yen vs. US$ followed and the Yen did rise. This made Yen loans more expensive leading to more attempts to pay off Yen loans fast, leading to more Yen buying …
It will need some forensic market analysis to understand exactly what forces were acting when, but in such a strong coupled dynamic system as the finance world, it will be very difficult to find any real reason.
The housing market was overvalued. The underlying credit/lending system was opaque if naot totally fraudulant. It unrevels. That would have happend with or without China.

Posted by: b | Aug 17 2007 20:44 utc | 15

Danny Schecter chimes in

[quoting Bowles:] It should be obvious to all and sundry by now that capitalism is in dire straits. Last week’s meltdown of the world’s major capital markets was only ‘rescued’ by the injection of literally hundreds of billions of dollars from by the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and the US Federal Reserve.So much for the magic of the ‘market’ which we are continuously told, solves all problems. And in fact, last week’s injection by the European Central bank of something like $100 billion dollars didn’t do the trick! More had to be ‘injected’ in order to stave off a total collapse of the world’s stock markets. The ‘injection’ is in reality a bail-out of the commercial banks.

Posted by: DeAnander | Aug 17 2007 21:07 utc | 16

I do wish people wouldn’t talk seriously about “slaughter” in the markets, when there is real slaughter (of the blood, limbs, guts and vomit kind) going on 24×7 in Iraq (and Darfur and Afghanistan and…), thanks in good part to the zeal for primitive accumulation that drives those same markets… it seems like such a careless metaphor…
maybe we should refer to it as Collateral Damage?

Posted by: DeAnander | Aug 17 2007 21:10 utc | 17

Deander, what about innocent bystanders?

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Aug 17 2007 22:17 utc | 18

yeah, I know… lots of people are going to be foreclosed. it’s wicked and tragic. it’s awful, it’s class warfare, it’s a crime. but still, says this angry little voice inside me, they’re not in Baghdad or Basra. their limbs remain attached and they aren’t picking glass out of their screaming kids’ backs or mopping up most of the blood that was in their uncle’s body right up until the latest explosion… I dunno. it’s just hard for me these days to use words like “slaughter” and “murderous” as metaphors when the real thing is, or should be, right in our face around the clock… maybe a state of mind I’ve fallen into where compassion fatigue has failed, and I’m unable to shield myself from the… can we call it genocide yet?… the destruction of Iraq and its people. it seems to be with me constantly: shattered buildings and pools of blood in the street. a live-action recreation of some mediaeval Hell. day after day. while our pols blather and posture and we go shopping (or watch the markets melt down, or both). and my tax dollars paying for it.
sorry, I’m incoherent. at some kind of low point of despair.

Posted by: DeAnander | Aug 18 2007 0:48 utc | 19

where compassion fatigue has failed, and I’m unable to shield myself from the… can we call it genocide yet?… the destruction of Iraq and its people. it seems to be with me constantly:
i’ve made a conscious effort to carve out some calm space for my mind this summer where the real happenings in the world aren’t with me every second and thru my dreams. an iraqi friend told me, we are more than just the war. i have found some real pleasure in watering my garden. i know this sounds absurd to people who rarely think about these things, but there is a likelihood i will go thru many other several month stretchs where that is all i think about. my family also, they don’t want to hear about it all the time.
you aren’t incoherent at all. hours and hours a day i think about people who have no choice but to think about the war all the time. sometimes the futility, like will we ever really be free in our lifetime, will they, iraqis? the anguish i hear in some of the iraqi bloggers posts and comments and the insensitive nature of the war supports asking them benign questions and floating these fantastical scenarios of right around the corner speak.
things are going to get much worse before they get much better. stay sane.

Posted by: annie | Aug 18 2007 1:48 utc | 20

@DeA – it seems like such a careless metaphor…
Yes it is. Sorry …

Posted by: b | Aug 18 2007 9:32 utc | 22

@Hamburger – Yen carry trade – some thoughts from Ian Welsh at the Agonist:

It’s unwinding now because large numbers of people are having to close out positions and thus repay their Yen denominated loans. The standard play was to borrow in Japan (which has had zero or near zero prime rates all decade) and then buy foreign denominated assets. When you unwind you have to convert your foreign currency back into Yen. That increased demand is driving up the price of the Yen.
As the Yen goes up, you get into a classic vicious spiral – the higher the Yen is compared to when you borrowed, the worst the (non Yen) assets you bought with that loan are looking. A large enough rise in the value of the Yen can wipe out your gains entirely, or even convert them into losses. So rises in the Yen cause even more people to need to unwind their positions, driving up the Yen even more, causing even more people to have to unwind their positions, causing… well, you get the picture.

I find this much more likely than some sinister plan of the Chinese – they ain’t gods either …

Posted by: b | Aug 18 2007 20:09 utc | 23

Topamax.

Topamax as weight loss drug. Topamax. Topamax weight loss.

Posted by: Topamax bulimia. | Jan 29 2010 19:54 utc | 24

Topamax.

Topamax off label uses. Topamax mood stabilizer. Topamax. Topamax weight loss.

Posted by: Topamax. | Jan 30 2010 19:26 utc | 25

Natural vytorin.

Vytorin. Vytorin symptoms.

Posted by: Muscle pain after 2 years from vytorin. | Feb 8 2010 11:53 utc | 26