Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 30, 2007
OT 07-59

News & views …

Comments

Ran across this Rush Limbaugh quote on a conservative blog:
“I know what the environmentalists want: they want to return to a ‘simpler,’ less advanced lifestyle. Well, frankly, I’m not going to use leaves from trees as toilet paper…”
Beyond it being a fine example of how Rush puts words into other people’s mouths so he can then slap them down, it gave me cause to think that efficient use of energy and other resources is the opposite of “simpler and less advanced”.
The old energy-intensive, high-emission industries & technologies were once held up as symbols of progress and prosperity, but we have come to see that we pay for them with our health and the decline in the quality of life.
We can pay x millions to clean them up at the source or 3-10x millions to treat the problems they cause. Which is the “advanced” solution?

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 30 2007 14:26 utc | 1

Conditioning the sheeples: Moment of TSA surrealist zen

I flew from JFK to LAX today, and something really weird happened when I arrived (at about 230PM local time).
I walked from the arrival gate towards baggage claim, and when I was about halfway there, all of a sudden about a dozen or more TSA personnel and private security staff appeared, shouting STOP WHERE YOU ARE. FREEZE. DO NOT MOVE. Not just at me, but all of the travelers who happened to be wandering through the hallway at that moment.
Some of the TSA guards then backed up against walls in the hallway, and sort of barked at anyone who tried to move a few feet away from their “spot,” like towards chairs to sit down or whatever.

After 30 minutes, the TSA people said, okay, you may leave now. And everyone unfroze, and went and got their bags. No explanation. I guess I should have pressed for an explanation, or demanded to know why we were being held without our consent and without a provided reason, but I was really tired and just wanted to get the hell out of there and go home. Perhaps I was wrong to have just walked away.

According to the comments, that happens often. Why do people agree with this?

Posted by: b | Aug 30 2007 15:07 utc | 2

b,
Zen, I guess. People often complain about being rushhed to and fro, I think it is great that the TSA is giving you a chance to simply stop and ponder the wonder of life and the world around you…

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 30 2007 15:17 utc | 3

i thought some of you may find this interesting:
http://www.housingtracker.net

Posted by: charmicarmicat | Aug 30 2007 16:17 utc | 4

Let’s hear it for Austin, Raleigh and KC! It’s up to them to keep the US housing market afloat!!!

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 30 2007 16:28 utc | 5

@charmicarmicat
huh. so why is the austin TX market so hot?

Posted by: catlady | Aug 30 2007 16:28 utc | 6

Salam Fayyad Orders 103 Palestinian NGOs in the West Bank and Gaza Closed

The Prime Minister in Ramallah, Salam Fayyad, stated on Tuesday, 28 August 2007, that his government has decided to dissolve 103 non-governmental organizations in the OPT for “committing legal, administrative, or financial violations of Law No. 1 of the Year 2000 on Benevolent Societies and Non-governmental Institutions.” Fayyad asked the beneficiaries of these organizations to head to the Ministry of Social Affairs in his government to state their needs.
It is noted that on 20 June 2007, President Mahmoud Abbas issued a presidential decree stipulating that all non-governmental organizations must reapply for registration. The first article in the decree granted the Minister of Interior “the authority to review the registration of all associations and non-governmental organizations issued by the Ministry of Interior or any other governmental body.” The second article granted the Minister of Interior or his delegate the right to “take the steps deemed suitable regarding associations and non-governmental organizations including closure, correction of status, or any other measures.” The third article stipulated that “all associations and non-governmental organizations must submit new registration applications within one week, and all those who violate are subject to legal action.” At the time, PCHR strongly condemned the decree, and considered it a serious violation of the constitutional right to form associations. In addition, the Centre viewed the decree subjects associations and non-governmental organizations to more restrictions than those already imposed by the Benevolent Associations and Non-Governmental Organizations Law of the Year 2000.

Just what this besieged population needs.

Posted by: Bea | Aug 30 2007 17:26 utc | 7

I might add that without a government in place or any remotest semblance of one, the NGOs have been the life blood of the territories. When Fayyad asks the beneficiaries of these organizations to head to the Ministry of Social Affairs to state their needs, that is patently absurd — it is not as if the “Ministry” of Social Affairs has anything to offer them at all. The “Ministry” is probably some run-down dusty old office with a secretary and a “Minister” and a handful of bored obsequious employees on the dole who may or may not have received their pay checks in the past year.

Posted by: Bea | Aug 30 2007 17:30 utc | 8

Bea – Is there a list of these organizations?

Posted by: beq | Aug 30 2007 17:49 utc | 9

why would a prime minister do this to his own people?

Posted by: annie | Aug 30 2007 18:06 utc | 10

Catlady,
shy is Austin so hot?
according to http://www.escapewomewhere.com/austinblog
But why did it increase from last year? Basically we had a lot of builders in the suburbs building cheap homes for people with less than stellar credit. Now lenders are changing their lending practices. And voila, now those people can’t get loans. This of course makes it harder to sell those homes. If we look at the numbers, we saw a total increase in inventory of 1083 homes. If we break this down, we saw an increase of 1050 in outer Austin and an increase in inventory of 33 homes in central Austin. So this is an increase of inventory in the suburbs of 15 percent compared to an increase of 2 percent for central Austin.
And I thought it was just the hoppin’ music and cultural scene…

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 30 2007 18:45 utc | 11

I am looking for a list. Meanwhile I found this, which shows that even the World Bank recognized the signal importance of NGOs to Palestinian society. It also mentions in passing a legacy of hostility between the Palestinian Authority and the NGOs. Interesting.

The Palestinian NGO Project is groundbreaking. For the first time in its history, the World Bank established a project to support NGOs directly, without going through “normal” channels – i.e., representatives of a State. Another unique feature of this first-ever Project is that the Bank financed most of the costs itself as a grant of US$10 million derived from its net income. Additional funding (US$5.3 million) was raised for this Project from the Saudi and Italian Governments, as well as local contributors. All of this was done for a “people without a State,” the people of Palestine. Bank officials administering the Palestinian NGO Project consider it to be “pioneering project funding” that has “enabled the Bank to better balance its client focus by including Palestinian NGOs as partners in project design and implementation.”
Concerned with a deteriorating socio-economic situation for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza coupled with the Palestinian Authority’s unwillingness or inability to take on most social service delivery, the Bank established the Palestinian NGO Project in 1997 to address poverty reduction. Palestinian NGOs became both a mechanism to deliver services to the poor and marginalized and a beneficiary of capacity building and institutional strengthening as a result of this Project.

My guess is that the ones targeted by Fayyad are run by Hamas, but that is pure speculation at this point. I will try and find out more.

Posted by: Bea | Aug 30 2007 18:58 utc | 12

My guess is that the ones targeted by Fayyad are run by Hamas, but that is pure speculation at this point
That’s not speculation, but logic thought. Of course its a way to restrict Hamas. The have earned their street cred by doing social services through such organisations.

Posted by: b | Aug 30 2007 19:09 utc | 13

OK, there was a list published in an Arabic newspaper but I can’t access that. The best I could do was to find this, in the statement by the Palestinian Center for Human Rights:

PCHR fears that the decision to dissolve 103 benevolent organizations and non-governmental organizations and the restrictions on civil society are implemented as part of the “State of Emergency” in the OPT. It is noted that there were no Presidential decrees to end the “State of Emergency” or its decrees, including the one on the re-registration of associations. The Center’s fears are accentuated by the fact that most of the associations to be dissolved were registered in Gaza during the tenure of ex-Minister of Interior, Sa’id Seyam, during the Hamas government.

That does clarify things somewhat.

Posted by: Bea | Aug 30 2007 19:09 utc | 14

‘Bin Laden’ Options Trades Have Wall Street Whispering

The blogosphere and options trading desks have been rife with speculation about these trades, which are unusually large bets that the market will make a huge move in the next month. Some entity, or entities, has taken a large position on extremely deep in the money* S&P 500 options, both puts and calls, that won’t pay off unless the market undergoes an extremely large price move between now and the options’ expiration on Sept. 21.

* Logic and the context of the rest of the article indicate that the article should say ‘extremely far out of the money’, not ‘extremely deep in the money’.
Just a thought on this – the prices mentioned in the article make no sense. They could buy 800’s and maybe even 900’s on the S&P for the same cost as 700 puts. Not to mention that anything short of a nuke in NY isn’t going to get the S&P to that level by 9/21. If I had my tinfoil hat handy I’d wonder whether this is just part of a minor Iran-just-attacked-us setup; but then, combined with Gonzo’s and Rove’s recent exits maybe somebody really does expect a wipe-Washington-off-the-map type event (not that those two things are necessarily mutually exclusive).

Posted by: mats | Aug 30 2007 19:34 utc | 15

mats, can you please try and interpret that into plain english? I really want to understand it, but the article is like reading Greek to me.

Posted by: Bea | Aug 30 2007 19:58 utc | 16

@mats – I followed that rumour the last days and haven’t found any real source for it – it’s nuts – a few options are taken as a hedge for some stupid deal on the other side.
Some report this as “billion $ deal” while in reality a few thousands of penny options are the only risk taken to cover some opposite risk elsewhere.

Posted by: b | Aug 30 2007 20:03 utc | 17

All those missing weapons…….. and pension funds for GI’s Hmmmm Turkey is now a Goat of the scape variety.

Weapons originally given to Iraqi security forces by the U.S. military have been recovered over the past year by the authorities in Turkey after being used in violent crimes in that country, Pentagon officials said.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Aug 30 2007 20:06 utc | 18

@Bea:
I’m no economist either, but it looks like this to me:
Someone is betting on an enormous shift in prices of stock within the next month, and doing it on a grand scale. You may recall hearing that this was done around 9/11. Here are the two major differences:
1) Both puts and calls are being purchased, meaning that the bet is not “this will go down” but “this will either rise or fall by a very large amount”.
2) Instead of targeting airline stocks, this appears to be bets on the market as a whole.
The entity placing the bets is anonymous, but their banker is claiming that the bets are there as a kind of insurance. Since these bets would reimburse the lender in the case of a stock market crash and the borrower in the case of a major rise, they reduce the risk of making a loan at a particular rate based on current values.

Posted by: The Truth Gets Vicious When You Corner It | Aug 30 2007 20:10 utc | 19

@mats
From thestreet.com link:

Dan Perper, a Partner at Peak 6, one of the largest option market makers and proprietary trading firms, has confirmed that the trades are part of a “box-spread trade.”
“This was done as a package in which the box spread was used [as a] means of alternative financing at more attractive interest rates” explained Perper.
Simply put, two parties agree to trade the box at a price that essentially splits the difference between current rates.
For example, the rough numbers would be that given the September 700/1700 box must settle at a value of 1,000 — it is currently trading around 997 — that translates into a 5% interest rate.

Given the fact that these calls are some 700 points in-the-money, and therefore have a delta of 1.0 — meaning the options price moves dollar-for-dollar with the underlying index — “the only advantage to owning them is it would be a more efficient and slightly less capital-intensive way to gain one-to-one exposure” to the S&P 500, Randy Frederick, director of derivatives at Charles Schwab, writes in an email exchange.

It looks to me like the “in the money” is not a typo. If that is so, almost all of the premium will be returned on settlement. As Perper says, this is a roundabout way of borrowing funds from someone without going through normal credit or reporting channels or getting index exposure without normal amounts of collateral.
What it may say is that someone is in enough trouble to need to game the system for liquidity.

Posted by: PeeDee | Aug 30 2007 21:15 utc | 20

I haven’t been able to follow Palestine closely enough to tell if this is alarmist or not, but it sounds very ominous:
Israel eyes Gaza

Try as you might, by landline or mobile, you can’t reach Amer Al-Jarah these days, or any of his senior aides. The general commander of the executive force for the Ismail Haniyeh government — dissolved by the Palestinian president — is now directing operations on the ground from secret shelters in anticipation of a military strike from Israel targeting Hamas militias. Hamas political leaders are also taking security precautions following indications that an Israeli operation in Gaza is imminent. On the evening of 26 August, Israeli television’s Channel 10 revealed that the Israeli army Southern Command had completed intensive training exercises for a huge military campaign. According to Alon Ben David, the station’s military commentator, the army’s recent incursions into Gaza were preliminary exercises for a major offensive to be undertaken by occupation forces in coordination with Washington and Ramallah.
Ben Kasbit, senior commentator for Maarev, has confirmed that Fatah officials in Ramallah have asked Washington to persuade the Olmert government to press ahead with such an offensive. He added that when he was in the Palestinian president’s Ramallah compound to interview Mahmoud Abbas, Fatah leaders there told him — much to his surprise — that they wanted Israel to crush Hamas in Gaza. Evidently Israel is acting on this hope. On 28 August, Israeli radio announced that the Palestinian president’s office had notified Olmert that Abu Mazen understands why Israel might stage a military operation in Gaza given continued Qassam missile fire.
(snip)
Salah Al-Bardawil, Hamas speaker in the Palestinian parliament, believes there is a direct correlation between the sudden return of Mohamed Al-Dahlan, former secretary of the Palestinian National Security Council, to Ramallah, and Israeli plans for a military operation against Hamas in Gaza. “We have reliable information that Dahlan wants to supervise, from Ramallah, assassination missions against Hamas leaders and activists in its military wing both during and after the planned Israeli military operation,” he told Al-Ahram Weekly.
(snip)

Posted by: Alamet | Aug 30 2007 23:25 utc | 21

Also from Al-Ahram, on Nahr Al-Bared, Lebanon:
The final ‘final battle’

Fatah Al-Islam’s women and children have at last left Nahr Al-Bared camp, heralding the final battle which could last days or weeks

Provides a good deal of interesting details.

Posted by: Alamet | Aug 30 2007 23:30 utc | 22

Iraq to sign security agreement with U.S.

(snip)
Iraqi Foreign Minister unveiled that Iraq “is seeking the signatory of a long-term security agreement with the U.S. next year once the U.N. mandate given to the presence of the Multi-National Forces in Iraq was over.”
Minister Zibari noted that the agreement recently reached among the Iraqi political leaders included a clause indicating the readiness of the Iraqi government to have a long-term partnership with the U.S. in security.
(snip)
“The move needs much efforts but it is a step towards enhancing the sovereignty of Iraq,” said the minister noting that “it is still too early to discuss establishing U.S. bases in Iraq according to this agreement but there will be U.S. troops’ presence for a long time with smaller size and different missions.”
(snip)

Posted by: Alamet | Aug 30 2007 23:40 utc | 23

Project for a New American Citizen: Rebuilding America’s Senses.
Is a Google vid, that is a great, well-researched presentation by activist Daniel Abrahamson.
This guy has it nailed.
via

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 31 2007 0:01 utc | 24

Alamet:
Thanks for the Al-Ahram pieces. The notion of a military incursion in Gaza is, tragically, all too plausible. I somewhere in the past 2-3 days that Defense Minister Barak had commented as much as well. I have the sinking feeling that it is just a matter of time.
The piece in Al Ahram mentioned a new poll (the first done since the Hamas takeover of Gaza) which had interesting results. For anyone who is interested, here is a link to it, and some of the key results are highlighted below. (I’ve guessed at the questions from their formulation in the text in order to make this easily viewable; they may have been worded differently, which would of course alter the interpretation slightly.)
At the bottom of the site there is a link to the entire results of the poll in a PDF.

Local Politics
(All respondents)
Did the situation in Gaza improve or worsen after the formation of the Fayyad government?
46.7% Worsened
27.1% Improved
Did the situation in the West Bank improve or worsen after the formation of the Fayyad government?
35.4% Improved
27.9% Worsened
(Respondents in Gaza only)
Has your feeling of security improved or worsened since Hamas took control of Gaza?
43.6% Improved
31.5% Worsened
Who is to blame for the internal fighting in Gaza?
43.5%: Hamas
28.4%: Fatah
17.5%: Both Hamas and Fatah
Do you expect Hamas to control the West Bank as it does in Gaza?
79.6%: No
If presidential elections were held today, who would you vote for?
20.6% Abbas (Fatah)
18.8% Haniyyeh (Hamas)
16.6% Barghouti (popular jailed Fatah leader)
Final Status Issues
In the context of the final-status negotiations, do you favor the exchange of land with Israel (this probably means giving up some land from the areas Israel occupied in 1967)
61.4%: No
38.0%: Yes
Should Israel be allowed to keep control over settlements in the West Bank in return for Israeli land (ie, a 100% compensation in land within Israel its in exchange for that taken by settlements in the territories occupied in 1967)
81.9%: No
17.4%: Yes
How should the issue of the Palestinian refugees be resolved?
68.5%: Return of the refugees to their [original] homes [ie, in Israel];
12.8%: Return of the refugees to the Palestinian state (ie, not to their original homes, and not to Israel)
6.7%: compensation
11.8%: Return of the refugees to their homes and to the Palestinian state as well as compensation.

Posted by: Bea | Aug 31 2007 0:04 utc | 25

@PeeDee
Yes, the article at the link has been almost completely rewritten since the time of my post (they really should have thrown up a new link rather than just adding an ‘updated’ tag). As it stood this morning it made very little sense at all — the focus was almost entirely on the large open interest in the 700 strike s&p500 puts, which are as far out of the money as you can get. Anyway, parts of it make more sense now, though there’s still no explanation for (and likely no explaining) why someone would have bought that many puts that far out of the money to begin with.
@Bea
The short is answer is it’s not really worth understanding, nothing to see here, move on, etc. For the slightly longer answer you can take this paragraph:

The first area of focus was that open interest September 700 S&P puts had such an unusually high number for such a low-probability trade. A put is a defensive bet that gives the holder the right to sell a security at a specified price, in this case more than 50% below the S&P 500’s current level of 1463 as of Wednesday’s close.

…which explains it correctly. There are over 110,000 contracts out there which somebody bought, which will expire worthless on 9/21 unless the market drops by more than 50% between now and then. This either is or isn’t particularly unusual – I’m not sure – but it’s not what you’d generally call a good bet.

Posted by: mats | Aug 31 2007 0:32 utc | 26

Heads up folks. Supposedly a big false flag op this weekend on american soil.
Guess that’s why we see the aforementioned
lining up uf compliant media. Hey,9/11 worked.
Funny how various groups like move on.org and impeach .org and numerous others are all converging on D.C. on the 15th of Sept, which was the original date of the issuance of the Petraeus report, only to find out the the admin is releasing it on 9/11. Funny date, that.

Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 31 2007 1:08 utc | 27

Bea @ 25, you are welcome. By the way, The Palestinian Pundit had some choice words about that poll last week:
Fabricating Palestinian Public Opinion, the So-Called Pollster Ghassan Khatib

Posted by: Alamet | Aug 31 2007 1:09 utc | 28

Heads up folks. Supposedly a big false flag op this weekend on american soil.
Whoever you are, can you say more? Where did you hear this? And where is it supposed to occur?

Posted by: Bea | Aug 31 2007 1:18 utc | 29

OK, worst case thinker and google addict that I am, I had to check this out. I found these links:
False Flag Alert – San Francisco Bay Area
Chatter About an “Incident” on West Coast at an All Time High
Craig’s List
Letter from Cindy SHeehan, Cynthia McKinney, et al
I take no responsibility whatsoever for the accuracy of the content. I just ran the search. The weirdest thing is that it appeared to me from a cursory look that except for the last one, the content on each site was an exact replica, as if someone had spread the same article everywhere, including on Craigs list. I have no idea what that means… most likely it is all hoo-hah.

Posted by: Bea | Aug 31 2007 1:35 utc | 30

Depraved for a guy who married a Billionaire & works for NYT…
Haq Agency reported that Jalal Talabani paid Thomas Friedman $250,000 to write an essay about him, the payment was done through Talabni’s son Qubad who escorted Friedman in Sulaymaniyah.
The source added that Friedman apologized for Talabani that he cannot visit him in Baghdad because his visit to Iraq wasn’t in advance coordination with the American administration and that it had entered Iraq through Sulaymaniyah, without the knowledge of the Iraqi government.
Talabani will travel today to Sulaymaniyah to meet Friedman tomorrow.
Talabani paid Thomas Friedman $250,000 to write an article about him
Reliable? Anyone not on the take anymore? Anyone?

Posted by: jj | Aug 31 2007 2:25 utc | 31

Bea, I googled
Dick Cheney terror event provocation pretext military attacks Iran
The link is only one of several but to me Brzezinski portended inside credibility to the rumors way back in Feb of this year.

Posted by: Juannie | Aug 31 2007 2:27 utc | 32

The link doesn’t seem to work:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/060207falseflag.htm

Posted by: Juannie | Aug 31 2007 2:29 utc | 33

It occurred to me today that xDems. cut deal w/Fascists in Power. We’ll toss 2 of our Nazis – Gonzo & Rove – to soon be replaced by others (Rove’ll go make a killing on ’08 elections just in case they exist some where – anyway prob. won’t need Rove if they nuke Iran & Cheney declares police state after new false flag); you give us Gestapo prerogatives to wiretap & ransack at will.

Posted by: jj | Aug 31 2007 2:31 utc | 34

Juannie! Good to see ya!@Bea, that was my post #27
I posted a lengthy screed which unfortunetly didnt post in response to your query about my sources. I will post again, but it is past midnight and I am out of time. George Ure,
Ubansurvival.com .

Posted by: possum | Aug 31 2007 4:09 utc | 35

urban survival.com

Posted by: possum | Aug 31 2007 4:19 utc | 36

Saw this in Mother Jones on the newsstand yesterday. I can’t even begin to explain how I feel about this:
School of torture — for kids

ROB SANTANA AWOKE TERRIFIED. He’d had that dream again, the one where silver wires ran under his shirt and into his pants, connecting to electrodes attached to his limbs and torso. Adults armed with surveillance cameras and remote-control activators watched his every move. One press of a button, and there was no telling where the shock would hit—his arm or leg or, worse, his stomach. All Rob knew was that the pain would be intense.
Every time he woke from this dream, it took him a few moments to remember that he was in his own bed, that there weren’t electrodes locked to his skin, that he wasn’t about to be shocked. It was no mystery where this recurring nightmare came from—not A Clockwork Orange or 1984, but the years he spent confined in America’s most controversial “behavior modification” facility.
In 1999, when Rob was 13, his parents sent him to the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, located in Canton, Massachusetts, 20 miles outside Boston. The facility, which calls itself a “special needs school,” takes in all kinds of troubled kids—severely autistic, mentally retarded, schizophrenic, bipolar, emotionally disturbed—and attempts to change their behavior with a complex system of rewards and punishments, including painful electric shocks to the torso and limbs. Of the 234 current residents, about half are wired to receive shocks, including some as young as nine or ten. Nearly 60 percent come from New York, a quarter from Massachusetts, the rest from six other states and Washington, D.C. The Rotenberg Center, which has 900 employees and annual revenues exceeding $56 million, charges $220,000 a year for each student. States and school districts pick up the tab.
The Rotenberg Center is the only facility in the country that disciplines students by shocking them, a form of punishment not inflicted on serial killers or child molesters or any of the 2.2 million inmates now incarcerated in U.S. jails and prisons. Over its 36-year history, six children have died in its care, prompting numerous lawsuits and government investigations. Last year, New York state investigators filed a blistering report that made the place sound like a high school version of Abu Ghraib. Yet the program continues to thrive—in large part because no one except desperate parents, and a few state legislators, seems to care about what happens to the hundreds of kids who pass through its gates.
(more at link)

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 31 2007 4:48 utc | 37

Bea/possum,
The story about the “suspicious middle eastern men” photographed casing Washington state ferries (where I live & use the ferries) first surfaced in the local paper, where they refused to publish the pictures claiming the evidence against (the 2 people) was insufficient to print their pictures. Whats a little weird, is that I first saw the story last week (visiting my no computer parents) in an op-ed piece in Ohio! Why this seemingly minor local PNW story has been picked up in an Ohio paper may indicate the FBI/DHS is shopping the story around. Either as a means to show non-cooperation (of the paper/media), or to drum up fear/anticipation, or both.
Being a regular user of the Washington state ferries, I’ve always thought (even before 911) that they would be an easy mark, for the deranged. The only security I’ve seen on the ferries post 911 is occasional armed escort by little Coast Guard zodiac boats. Which has ended recently after one of the sailors went overboard and got caught under the prop and died. I could never figure out what the escort service was meant to anyway, since the biggest threat to ferries is a bomb (parked among all those other cars) aboard the boat. And I’ve not seen any security against that kind of threat – either before this story broke or after. If the threat against the mysterious two was to be taken as seriously as they say it was, you’d think security against the most obvious would have been increased, but as far as I can see (rode one yesterday) nothing has changed.

Posted by: anna missed | Aug 31 2007 6:15 utc | 38

@jj,
still on the Antioch College kick, but wading through the documents and speeches by its assassins, the name Tom Friedman and the book The World Is Flat keep coming up in decisionmaking frameworks. Tom Friedman killed my college!
Though, for those who have expressed interest, the alumni and others are on the road to saving/resurrecting it. Almost entirely good news. Radical education in America may survive.

Posted by: Rowan | Aug 31 2007 6:48 utc | 39

Lawmakers Describe ‘Being Slimed in the Green Zone’

The sheets of paper seemed to be everywhere the lawmakers went in the Green Zone, distributed to Iraqi officials, U.S. officials and uniformed military of no particular rank. So when Rep. James P. Moran Jr. (D-Va.) asked a soldier last weekend just what he was holding, the congressman was taken aback to find out.
In the soldier’s hand was a thumbnail biography, distributed before each of the congressmen’s meetings in Baghdad, which let meeting participants such as that soldier know where each of the lawmakers stands on the war. “Moran on Iraq policy,” read one section, going on to cite some the congressman’s most incendiary statements, such as, “This has been the worst foreign policy fiasco in American history.”

Looks like the soldieres were well prepared …
Not so much some Iraqis

At one point, the three were trying to discuss the state of Iraqi security forces with Iraq’s national security adviser, Mowaffak al-Rubaie, but the large, flat-panel television set facing the official proved to be a distraction. Rubaie was watching children’s cartoons.
When Moran asked him to turn it off, Rubaie protested with a laugh and said, “But this is my favorite television show,” Moran recalled.
Porter confirmed the incident, although he tried to paint the scene in the best light, noting that at least they had electricity.

Message to Congress: You are irrelevant …

Posted by: b | Aug 31 2007 6:55 utc | 40

Rowan, glad you’re not just taking the death. How does he figure in? Hell, we might as well just submit to the destruction of everything we care about…sigh of inevitability? Lose Antioch & you’re left w/trash like kos…so keep fighting…

Posted by: jj | Aug 31 2007 7:05 utc | 41

In light of Sen. Craig’s public restroom sex ordeal, I recently had this traveling experience, I was drinking coffee heavily so that I would stay awake and needed to relieve myself pretty badly. I pulled into a rest area, locked the car doors, and went into the restroom. When I entered I noticed it was unoccupied except for a pair of sneakers visible under the second stall.
As I unzipped at one of the urinals and began to relieve my burning bladder I heard a voice say “Hey, what’s up?”. I looked around and there was no one else in the restroom. After a moments hesitation, I answered “Not much”.
A little time went by and he says, “What ya doing?”.
I didn’t feel very comfortable talking to someone in a stall but I didn’t want to be rude and answered, “Uh…we are heading to Butte, to visit friends.”
“Want to come over?”, he says.
At this point I am really uncomfortable and I finish up and scoot over to the sink to wash up. “No I don’t think so.”, I replied. Wow, was this something else. I had never even had someone next to me with a wide stance before and now I’ve got someone in the stall asking me over!
As I reached for the paper towels to dry my hands I hear, “Hey man, can I call you back? There’s some asshole in the bathroom answering every thing I say.”

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 31 2007 7:44 utc | 42

Uncle, you trying out new material for a comedy act??
Fundies, Sewer Rats are the same the world over. It’s not about homosexuals, most of the guys seems to be, it’s about their Virulent Hatred of Women. Australia brings us this, but it could have been Utah, or…
A fundamentalist church pastor had sex with two of his teenage daughters to educate them on how to be good wives, a South Australian court has heard.
The 54-year-old man, who cannot be named, was today sentenced in the SA District Court to eight and a half years jail after pleading guilty to seven counts each of incest and unlawful sexual intercourse.
The court heard that the man had sex with his daughters for nearly a decade from 1991 when they were aged 13 and 15 at the family property.
The sex took place at various locations including in a shearer’s shed, a paddock, on the back of a ute and, on one occasion, at the girls’ grandparents house.
The man told the court the sex was not about fulfilling his desires but about teaching his daughters how to behave for their husbands when they eventually married, as dictated in scripture.
Fundie PASTOR raped his daughters for 10 yrs.
Why the hell didn’t they name this degenerate prick?

Posted by: jj | Aug 31 2007 7:51 utc | 43

LOL – except I can’t cause I’ll wake the house…

Posted by: jcairo | Aug 31 2007 7:52 utc | 44

why would a prime minister do this to his own people?
why, he had a premonition… 😉

Posted by: jcairo | Aug 31 2007 7:53 utc | 45

So, Larry Craig was outed as a member in good standing of the Gross Old Perverts Party. but that doesn’t answer the question of who outed him & why. This piece by Buchannan – yes, that one – implicitly raises question whether, as one of 2 Senators to support Romney, he might have been outed to humiliate, or otherwise hinder said candidate. link

Posted by: jj | Aug 31 2007 8:00 utc | 46

44 is in reference to 42 as 43 wasn’t yet there, just to clarify

Posted by: jcairo | Aug 31 2007 8:04 utc | 47

French troops ‘raped girls during Rwanda genocide’

French soldiers stationed in Rwanda during the genocide in 1994 have been accused of “widespread rape” by a Rwandan commission investigating France’s role during the conflict.
The commission, which is due to publish its final report in October, will also provide fresh evidence that French soldiers trained the Interahamwe, the extremist Hutu militia responsible for most of the killing, and even provided them with weapons.
The allegations threaten to plunge relations between Rwanda and its former colonial master to a new low. It could also lead to Rwanda seeking reparations from France at the International Court of Justice. “That is something we are considering,” said one government official.
France’s support for the genocidal Rwandan regime – both before and during the slaughter – has been well documented, but the new report sheds some light on the extent of that backing.

Posted by: b | Aug 31 2007 8:37 utc | 48

anna missed @ 38, a few weekends ago some 10,000 people were sent away from the BC Ferries terminal that serves Vancouver Island from the mainland. The reason that their cars were searched and they were refused to board the ships to their holidays? A bomb threat.
Interesting that earlier this year the newly-privatized ferry system was awarded federal money to upgrade its security — when the only danger is whether you’ll have to endure one or two sailing waits because of heavy holiday weekend traffic.
The newspapers reported that the threat was phoned in from a mall payphone by a man with a “middle eastern accent.”
Just up here across the 49th parallel we’re enduring the same damn threats to our peaceful life — I spoke recently to some aunts from the mountain country (north of Montana, but in British Columbia), they are retired schoolteachers and well educated, but the topic was “fight them over there.”
Of course they are from an area where one of the only ways to distinguish yourself as a young man is to join the Canadian Forces, now jostling for a chance to go to Afghanistan and see some action.
History doesn’t repeat itself, but in Canada, 1/10th the size of the US, we seem to also be about 30 years behind the times.
It’s hard to swallow that Canadians are not much different than Americans when it comes to this, I found myself adamant about “there is no terrorism!”
Their answer? How to prove it … if I’d had more time I would have shown them this website and the Internet in general.

Posted by: jonku | Aug 31 2007 9:21 utc | 49

At Least 740 Arrested in Chile Protest Violence

Chilean officials say at least 740 people have been arrested after clashing with police during mass protests in Santiago over the government’s social and economic policies.
Authorities say demonstrators hurled objects at police and hid behind barricades Wednesday as officers used tear gas and water cannon to disperse the crowds. Some shops were looted as the violence erupted in the capital.
Dozens of people were injured, including a ruling coalition senator, Alejandro Navarro, who was seen bleeding from the head after he was clubbed by an officer.
Labor unions organized the protests, saying workers should get a larger portion of profits from Chilean industry. Chile is the world’s biggest copper producer and has benefited from high prices for the metal in recent years.

Posted by: b | Aug 31 2007 9:50 utc | 50

Yunno, Senator Craig could make a pretty decnet case of not having done anything illgal or immoral, wlthough pleading guilty & then lying to his arresting officer does make it harder to defend himself.
But in the end, I am happy whenever one of these sick old homophobes gets hoist by his own petard, so to speak, not only for his sake, but for the way it makes other Republican squirm and narrow their “stance”.
And after this event, I’ll bet any Republican senator who drops a $100 bill on a restroom floor will leave it lie there rather than risk reaching down to pick it up…

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 31 2007 13:16 utc | 51

why would a prime minister do this to his own people?
why, he had a premonition… 😉

are you going to follow me around and
this is the third thread and your
umteenth snark. why? does every opinion of mine have to go thru some jcairo review? don’t play cutesy w/me w/your little smiley face. you have royally pissed me off.

Posted by: annie | Aug 31 2007 14:04 utc | 52

jonku #49. i think it is clear we are being revved up for ‘total war’. just in the last week we have a nuclear holocaust from bush, the WW3 comment from our UN ambassador, Suspected chemical weapons found at U.N. office,etc etc and i wonder how much of this 4% (preventative measures)is spent on driving non stories to get the public ‘informed’.

Posted by: annie | Aug 31 2007 14:15 utc | 53

annie,
Chemical weapons at the UN? Sounds like a pretty clear-cut case to start bombing, followed up by a full-scale invasion.
Then they could “spread democracy” to the UN, set up a US- friendly Security Council and establish permanent bases there…

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 31 2007 14:40 utc | 54

Secret Report: Corruption is “Norm” Within Iraqi Government (they could have omitted the word “iraq” and would still be right)

The draft–over 70 pages long–was obtained by The Nation, and it reviews the work (or attempted work) of the Commission on Public Integrity (CPI), an independent Iraqi institution, and other anticorruption agencies within the Iraqi government. Labeled “SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED/Not for distribution to personnel outside of the US Embassy in Baghdad,” the study details a situation in which there is little, if any, prosecution of government theft and sleaze. Moreover, it concludes that corruption is “the norm in many ministries.”
The report depicts the Iraqi government as riddled with corruption and criminals-and beyond the reach of anticorruption investigators. It also maintains that the extensive corruption within the Iraqi government has strategic consequences by decreasing public support for the U.S.-backed government and by providing a source of funding for Iraqi insurgents and militias.

Posted by: b | Aug 31 2007 14:55 utc | 55

b,
the basic flaw in the CPI assessment is the assumption that there is any sort of government in Iraq: there is nothing more than a collectin of racketeers and scam artists using government offices and stationery.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 31 2007 15:12 utc | 56

I find that massive market bet hard to explain. A conspiracist view is that an insider couldn’t repress greed. I don’t believe that though.
It is so though that in the past say four weeks rumors about, predictions of, and even calls for a new terrorist attack have amplified, from all quarters: Repub pols, insiders, conspiracists, etc.
A lot of them were prompted by that senseless security report, from some alphabet soup agency, Bernhard linked to it I seem to remember. That got ppl all stirred up.
There are wackos all about, so you never know, but I would judge the probability of a massive terrorist attack in the US as extremely low to non-existent.
1) The interpretation that 9/11 was implemented to galvanize the American ppl (false flag, attack counter-attack scheme) is very common. That BushCo used it post hoc in this way is clear. That doesn’t however mean the interpretation is correct, in the sense of ‘driving motive.’
2) It worked to some extent, but that may be exaggerated. Sure Bush burst through the polls and some rushed out to enlist and a climate of fear and hate was stirred up, in my eyes some of it mostly posturing, superficial, quite insincere, just follow-the-leader stuff.
Was it necessary to invade Afghanistan? Absolutely not. That was planned well before and the whole international community gave it the nod. Was it necessary to invade Iraq? Iraq was invaded along the evil-dictator-threat-to the US-WMD line. The ‘terrorist’ additions (Atta in Baghdad! Atta in Prague! Saddam as terrorist, etc.) were clumsy added on frills. What counted, more than 9/11, is the power of Bushco (or neocons), and the fact that the sheeples would, and will, follow. 9/11 provided a ‘talking point’ eagerly cheered by the whole crowd .. So, somehow the idea that a terrorist attack is a positive thing becomes current!
The US establishment and a part of its ppl grasp, and even openly state, that an attack is immaterial in terms of deaths but it is its symbolic value that counts, its propaganda punch, if you will. In that way they void – without realizing it – any national sentiment and mentally join with oppressive, fascistic (if I may use that word loosely) leaders, using any excuse to murder, fully realizing that the reason is false, but, heh, well, it is supposed to fool some ppl who don’t get these things.
3) 9/11 was a unique, extraordinary event. The confluence of interests and aims and agreement of various parties will *never* be replicated. (= imho.)
4) That was then, this is now. Fool me once, fool me twice? The establishment swayed between ‘terror is at your door’ and ‘we are keeping you safe’. Not good strategy. If all the nutty security measures, loss of liberties, money spent, confessions of failures, re-vamps, re-organization, etc. don’t have their announced effect, as in increased protection, BushCo will be reviled. Their own lies will bite them in the ass. Of course the faction who loves attack will get off on it and rally. (see 6)
5) The example of Spain is stark. The ‘terra’ attack backfired, Aznar was kicked out and Zapatero (who did not expect to win and was thrown by the whole thing) elected. OK – Spain and the US – different places. Yet, the line between rallying behind a leader in case of ‘terror’ and condemning that leader in case of same is thin. Rove didn’t quit to have family time.
6) Yet, it is not be excluded that a terror attack would have the aim not of making Americans more terrified, victimized, religious, obedient, or war mongers, but simply to provoke an ultimate explosion, martial law and all that… no…a bad calculation right now.
Long enough!

Posted by: Tangerine | Aug 31 2007 16:31 utc | 57

@jj,
In the last couple of months since the announcement, the alumni and friends gathered $8million in pledges, have created a communications network, gotten thousands of people interested and a bunch of press. The Board of Trustees heard this and announced that they’d work with us, and if we had money and a business plan in October, they’d reverse their decision. The faculty have also sued for an injunction to prevent the college from closing. Carrot and stick.
Friedman fits in because a couple of years ago at a Trustee meeting, one of them recommended The World Is Flat. The Chancellor (the Cheney figure in this mess) read it, and has used it as her framework for decision-making.

n a speech I gave to the Board in February 2006, I shared that there is a section of Thomas Friedman’s book, The World is Flat, that, while reading, I bracketed and wrote “Antioch College-question mark” in the margin. Friedman explains that the measure of a society or institution is most often in classical economic and social statistics. But there is another measure much harder to gauge that is more revealing in Friedman’s eyes. Does your institution have more memories than dreams, or more dreams than memories?
Friedman declares that he knows when an organization is in trouble and that is when they tell him how good they were in the past. When memories exceed dreams, the end is near. The hallmark of a truly successful organization is the willingness to abandon what made it successful and start fresh.

I have no idea how that became analysis, but we gave a person who believed that bunk the highest position in the University system, and somehow things went wrong.

Posted by: Rowan | Aug 31 2007 16:55 utc | 58

Tang,
in the case of the Madrid bombings, the people were basically pissed off at the Aznar government’s attempt to blame the Basque terrorists instead of admitting it was Al-Qaeda.
Aznar gained a lot of support and popularity for the way he had dealt with Basque separatist terror, but threw it all away by inviting Islamist terror through his support of the Iraq invasion.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 31 2007 18:00 utc | 59

Rowan, I knew it was in trouble when a friend’s daughter wanted to go there, 10-15 yrs. ago. She was a Nat’l Merit Scholar. But that no longer comes w/a Scholarship. They couldn’t come up w/the money, so she was stuck going somewhere that could. Sad. Do you know if Reed is likewise in trouble, or what sort of adaptations they’ve made?
Sounds like the crisis that rallies the troops & clarifies the focus. Hopefully everyone now understands that the focus should be as locus of opposition to TFriedman’s worldview. That would make it essential & unique. Would allow you to get top faculty for less money as well. I’m thinking of Henry Giroux for starters. Be awesome if you became an anti-predator think tank & teaching center. Ohio has so much great land, you could add Major Permaculture Center – become a center of renewal. Maybe other faculty figuring out how to reseed manufacturing…Education for an age of climatic turbulence…making transition from Civ. of Cheap Oil to one of dear oil…If you get clearly focused, Everyone gets Energized & oriented around common purpose… Freshman Seminar in History of False Flag Attacks…Stop Trying to “Compete”, Distinguish Yourselves…On money, a Putney Alum, donated $100M – largest donation to prep school ever & it’s the only Liberal/Experimental Prep School….so there should be some money to be had amongst Alums…

Posted by: jj | Aug 31 2007 20:31 utc | 60

@jj:
Don’t know whether Reed is in trouble or not, but as an ex-National Merit Scholar Reedie (year after egocentric asshole Steve Jobs) I can attest that while the student body of the mid-seventies (yikes!) lived up to its motto (“Communism, Atheism, Free Love,” yes, those were good ole days…), even by then the education did not. In the mid-seventies, Reed was essentially a prep school for future college professors, and as they were not hiring back in those days, and that recession, things were pretty grim. Usual reflexive leftist politics — no great understanding or analysis of why things were as they were.
There was a deep emphasis on the Humanities, which was good, but kept everyone pretty well grounded in mainstream Western historical thought; History was taught as great men, great thoughts — which was only slightly better contextualized than great men alone — emphasis was still on individual historical acts, not class struggle. Great Thoughts Theory does concern itself with noble liberties, but rarely considers such base rights and freedoms as food, shelter, and sustenance for the hoveled masses.
Reed also had the only undergraduate nuclear reactor at the time.
Boy, thing were cheap back then. It was easy to get some crummy job and just live. Rent $36/m. Got food stamps, too, which helped me pay off my college loan.

Posted by: Malooga | Aug 31 2007 20:58 utc | 61

Whoops, too much reminiscing. The point was that Reed was no Antioch then, and I doubt it has been more recently.

Posted by: Malooga | Aug 31 2007 21:00 utc | 62

watch your back, bitches

Posted by: dan of steele | Aug 31 2007 21:03 utc | 63

This from Forbes.

Posted by: beq | Aug 31 2007 21:36 utc | 64

@beq: I’ve been spending some time this afternoon looking up articles on Katrina, then and now, to use in an intro to jazz class I’ll be teaching this year. I was looking up info to go with the recording I have of the Sept. 2005 Lincoln Center performance: Higher Ground Hurricane Relief Benefit Concert.
There is a CD (77 minutes of music from an event that was nearly 4 hours long), but no DVD of the event. I was glad to find Alternet had transcripts of the speeches given by Harry Belafonte and Danny Glover, as well as a recently posted video by Robert Greenwald, interviews with Katrina survivors 2 years later.

Posted by: catlady | Aug 31 2007 22:34 utc | 65

ADL vs. ADL – More on the genocide denial brouhaha.
Pass the popcorn – This one ain’t over yet.
And for any who are interested, Fisk had a very interesting and moving piece in the Independent this week about the Armenian genocide. The Forgotten Holocaust. Written from Turkey.

Posted by: Bea | Aug 31 2007 23:58 utc | 66

The Forgotten Holocaust.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 1 2007 0:18 utc | 67

Oh Dear. It looks like the Bush Regime has been doing a bit of house keeping lately:
According to the White House, at least five million e-mails were not properly archived and may be lost forever, in apparent violation of the Presidential Records Act.

Posted by: Bagem | Sep 1 2007 0:38 utc | 68

Update on Nahr al-Bared Camp Fisk: Strange goings on in Lebanon

Fouad Siniora, the Lebanese prime minister, ensconced in his little “green zone” in the old Turkish serail, can do little to alter the course of this coming battle. Supplied with bombs by the Americans so that the Lebanese army can continue to blast its way through the Palestinian Nahr el-Bared refugee camp – one of the most uncovered stories of the Middle East year – his government can do no more than wonder at the resistance of the ruthless non-Hizbollah Islamist insurgents who are still holding out there. The US ambassador watches approvingly as the Lebanese army continues to “advance” amid strongholds and bunkers at a cost of almost 140 soldiers’ lives although, after four months of “advancing” – as one western NGO remarked to me a few days ago – they might soon, at this rate, reach Cyprus. [This gave me a good belly laugh. So true.]

PLO Representative in Lebanon Insists that Nahr al-Bared Will be Rebuilt

Abbas Zaki, the Palestinian Liberation Organization’s Lebanon representative, said Palestinians and Lebanese are united in one struggle against terrorism and that fighting in Nahr al-Bared will end in “a matter of days.” Zaki was speaking to reporters after meeting Premier Fouad Siniora at the Grand Serail Wednesday to discuss the rebuilding of the devastated camp and the return of the displaced residents.
“Premier Siniora will invite all concerned parties and donor countries to convene a conference to rebuild Nahr al-Bared on September 10,” Zaki said. “This ends all speculation surrounding the rebuilding of the camp. What we agreed with the Lebanese government is that the displacement is temporary and the return to the camp is assured.”
Zaki said the rebuilding of the camp will commence once “the gang” is dealt with and the mines, booby traps and rubble are removed. Siniora received a call from Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas during the meeting with Zaki. Siniora and Abbas reaffirmed Palestinian-Lebanese cooperation on rebuilding the camp.
Former President Amin Gemayel met Wednesday with head of the Palestinian Lebanese Dialogue Committee, Khalil Mekkawi, with whom he discussed the Lebanese government’s plans to rebuild the refugee camp and its surroundings in order to revive the local economy.

Residents of Nahr al-Bared Are Convinced They Will Not Be Returning There

The displaced at the Beddawi school voiced foremost their fears of a conspiracy to scatter the former Nahr al-Bared residents throughout Lebanon and never rebuild the camp. One evacuee, a doctor, said he and others taking sanctuary at the school would leave there only to return to Nahr al-Bared.
UNRWA officials promised the refugees that the Nahr al-Bared camp would be rebuilt.
“We want you to go back,” Cook said. “I can’t tell you when it will be safe. I can only tell you we’ll get in there as soon as possible. Nobody in the army has contacted me about letting people go back in – far from it.”
“Our plan is to reconstruct the houses in the Nahr al-Bared camp,” Souaiby said. “We as UNRWA are committed to bringing them back to the camp. The Lebanese government also expressed its commitment to the same. There is a commitment on all sides to the reconstruction of the camp. We cannot but tell them that we are fully committed.”

Lebanese Army Allegedly torturing Hapless Palestinian Refugees from Nahr al-Bared
Earlier I read a piece that I cannot now retrieve which said that the Lebanese Army had gotten a big boost out of this whole episode, and that people are grateful to the army for standing up to the “rascals” Fatah al-Islam. I started thinking about how many ways this whole situation has served precisely the US and Israel’s interests: Strengthen the Lebanese Army’s street cred; provide a pretext to arm them to the gills to prepare for the next round of fighting against Hizbollah; give them live urban training, also for the same purpose; besmirch the name “Fatah” and confuse people as to whether this group is mainstream PLO or not (thereby encouraging the confused Lebanese to despise Palestinians even more than they already do, if that is possible); sow more division amongst Palestinians in yet another arena; destroy a refugee camp where an army base is needed in its place; and on and on. It was really quite a diabolically brilliant move made by someone who is very Machiavellian. And what genuine resistance movement would ever undertake such a pointless and destructive mission anyway? What on earth do THEY stand to gain????

Posted by: Bea | Sep 1 2007 1:10 utc | 69

catlady – did you find this one?

Posted by: beq | Sep 1 2007 1:20 utc | 70

Maybe better.

Posted by: beq | Sep 1 2007 1:26 utc | 71

“pretext to arm them to the gills to prepare for the next round of fighting against Hizbollah”
you think shelling a refugee camp really prepares them for going toe to toe with Hizbollah Bea?
maybe like murdering rock throwing teens prepared the IDF for the same last summer.

Posted by: ran | Sep 1 2007 2:42 utc | 72

@ran
true, but it’s better than sitting around in a barracks drinking coffee all summer. I mean, from the point of view of “training.”

Posted by: Bea | Sep 1 2007 3:01 utc | 73

President Bush Discusses Homeownership Financing
Rose Garden
Play Video Video (Windows)
RSS Feed Presidential Remarks
Play Audio Audio
Fact sheet Fact Sheet: New Steps to Help Homeowners Avoid Foreclosure
Fact sheet In Focus: Jobs & Economy
11:05 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Thank you for joining me. Secretary Paulson and Secretary Jackson gave me an update on the strong fundamentals of our nation’s economy. Economic growth is healthy (sic), and just yesterday we learned that our economy grew at a strong rate of 4 percent in the second quarter of this year (based on easy-credit asset inflation and Defense expenditures bought with deficit spending). Wages are rising, (sic) unemployment is low, (doesn’t even meet population growth, nevermind retirement replacement) exports are up (due solely to commodities inflation), and steady job creation continues (in Dubai and China).
President George W. Bush stands with Secretary Alfonso Jackson, of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Secretary Henry Paulson Jr.,of the Department of Treasury, during a statement Friday, Aug. 31, 2007, in the Rose Garden regarding homeownership financing.
“Owning a home has always been at the center of the American Dream. Together with the United States Congress, I will continue working to help make that dream a reality for more of our citizens.”
White House photo by Shealah Craighead
We also had a good discussion about the situation in America’s financial markets. The markets are in a period of transition, as participants reassess and re-price risk (since bundled CDO’s marked up arbitrarily give investors absolutely no idea of their true market value). This process has been unfolding (some would say ‘hemorraghing’) for some time, and it’s going to take more time to fully play out. As it does, America’s overall economy will remain strong enough to weather any turbulence.
Photo of Bush buying some souvenir knickknack at White House gift shop with cash borrowed from an aide.
“Whatever you do, don’t stop shopping!”
One area that has shown particular strain is the mortgage market, especially what’s known as the sub-prime sector of the mortgage market (and altA and jumbos). This market has seen tremendous ‘innovation’ (five-finger discounts) in recent years, as new lending products make credit available to more people. For the most part, this has been a positive development, and the reason why is millions of families have taken out mortgages to buy their homes, and American homeownership is at a near all-time high.
Unfortunately, there’s also been some excesses in the lending industry. One of the most troubling developments has been the increase in adjustable rate mortgages that start out with a very low interest rate and then reset to a higher rate after a few years. This has led some homeowners to take out loans larger than they could afford based on overly-optimistic assumptions about the future performance of the housing market (mortgage brokers literally forcing borrowers to take out larger loans than they need, just to increase broker commissions) . Others may have been confused by the terms of their loan, or misled by irresponsible lenders. Whatever the reason they chose this kind of mortgage, some borrowers are now unable to make their monthly payments, or facing foreclosure.
Complicating the situation for borrowers is the nature of today’s mortgage market. In many cases, the neighborhood banker who issued a family’s mortgage does not own that mortgage for long. Instead, mortgages are sold as securities on the global market. And that makes it harder for the lender and borrower to renegotiate.
The recent disturbances in the sub-prime mortgage industry are modest (compared to the devastation of Iraq, for example) — they’re modest in relation to the size of our economy. But if you’re a family — if your family is one of those having trouble making the monthly payments, this problem doesn’t seem modest at all. I understand these concerns, and therefore, I’ve made this a top priority to help our homeowners navigate these financial challenges, so that many families as possible can stay in their homes. That’s what we’ve been working on, a plan to help homeowners (hold onto your wallet, The Decider is ‘planning’ again!).
We’ve got a role, the government has got a role to play — but it is limited. A federal bailout of lenders would only encourage a recurrence of the problem. It’s not the government’s job to bail out speculators, or those who made the decision to buy a home they knew they could never afford. Yet there are many American homeowners who could get through this difficult time with a little flexibility from their lenders, or a little help from their government. So I strongly urge lenders to work with homeowners to adjust their mortgages. I believe lenders have a responsibility to help these good people to renegotiate so they can stay in their home. And today I’m going to outline a variety of steps at the federal level to help American families keep their homes.
First, we’re going to work to modernize and improve the Federal Housing Administration — that’s known as the FHA. The FHA is a government agency that provides mortgage insurance to borrowers through a network of private sector lenders. Sixteen months ago I sent Congress an FHA modernization bill that would help more homeowners qualify for this insurance by lowering down-payment requirements, by increasing loan limits and providing more flexibility in pricing. These reforms would allow the FHA to reach families that need help, those with low incomes and less-than-perfect credit records or little savings.
Of course, not everyone can be helped. Let’s be honest. Certainly, homosexual unions won’t qualify for faith-based Federal insurance. I suppose frequenting airport bathrooms may get you disqualified. A criminal record for shoplifting, an arrest for protesting, having an abortion, being on a no-fly list. Disqualified. Being an undocumented alien will get you a one-way busfare to Nogales. African American from New Orleans? I’m sorry, you’re not on the list. And, of course, our brave returning American soldiers, who get one last $2000 check and an eviction notice from the BQ, will have insufficient credit and heavy medical expenses to qualify for a home loan. Maybe they can live at home with their parents again.
Last year the House passed this bill with more than 400 votes. Unfortunately, Congress hasn’t acted this year. It would be a good task for Congress to come and get FHA modernization done so that we can help these people refinance their homes, so more people can stay in their homes. I look forward to signing a bill as quickly as possible.
In the coming days, the FHA will launch a new program called FHA-Secure. This program will allow American homeowners who have got good credit history but cannot afford their current payments to refinance into FHA-insured mortgages. (of course, it’s first come, first served, and registered Republicans get first priority.) This means that many families who are struggling now (to bridge their roll-over investment mortgage flip) will be able to refinance their loans, meet their monthly payments and keep their homes. In other words, we’re going to start reaching out and making sure people know that this option is available to them so they can stay in their homes.
Second, I’m going to work with Congress to temporarily reform a key housing provision of the federal tax code, which will make it easier for homeowners to refinance their mortgages during this time of market stress. Under current law, homeowners who are unable to meet their mortgage payments can face an unexpected tax bill. For example, let’s say the value of your house declines by $20,000 and your adjustable rate mortgage payments have grown to a level you cannot afford. If the bank modifies your mortgage and forgives $20,000 of your loan, the tax code treats that $20,000 as taxable income. When your home is losing value and your family is under financial stress, the last thing you need to do is to be hit with higher taxes. (however, I have no problem saddling you and your grandchildren with an additional $50B in deficit spending on top of $450B spent already in my Endless War on Iraq).
So I believe we need to change the code to make it easier for people to refinance their homes and stay in their homes. (after all, soaring easy-credit home valuations bring in more Federal income taxes, more property taxes, and more sales taxes in an ever-increasing death spiral, so that soon your graduating college student young family will be looking at a $1M buy-in for even a basic chicken shack) And to this end, I’ve called Senator Debbie Stabenow of Michigan and told her that she’s on to a good idea with the bill that she and George Voinovich have submitted to the Senate. The House has got Rob Andrews of New Jersey and Ron Lewis of Kentucky introducing legislation that is a positive step toward changing the tax code so people aren’t penalized when they refinance their homes. With a few changes in the Senate version and the House version, this administration can support these bills, and we look forward to working with them — the senators and the members of the House — to pass common-sense legislation to help us address this issue.
Third, my administration will launch a new foreclosure avoidance initiative to help struggling homeowners find a way to refinance. Secretary Jackson and Secretary Paulson are going to reach out to a wide variety of groups that offer foreclosure counseling and refinancing for American homeowners. These groups include community organizations like NeighborWorks and mortgage lenders and loan services, and the FHA, as well as government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These organizations exist to help people refinance, and we expect them to do that.
See, it’s easy for me to stand up here and talk about refinancing — some people don’t even know what I’m talking about. And we need to have a focused effort to help people understand the mortgage financing options available to them, or to identify homeowners before they face hardships and help them understand what’s possible.
Finally, the federal government is taking a variety of actions to make the mortgage industry more transparent, more reliable and more fair, so we can reduce the likelihood that these kind of lending problems won’t happen again. Federal banking regulators are improving disclosure requirements to ensure that lenders provide homeowners with complete and accurate and understandable information about their mortgages, including the possibility that their monthly payments could rise dramatically. In other words, we believe that if the consumer is better informed, these kind of problems won’t arise — are less likely to arise in the first place. Banking regulators are also strengthening lending standards to help ensure that borrowers are not approved for mortgages larger than they can handle. (think of it as track signals changing after a slow-motion trainwreck)
This administration will soon issue regulations that require mortgage brokers to fully disclose their fees and closing costs. We’re pursuing wrongdoing and fraud in the mortgage industry through the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and other agencies.(we’re pursuing wrongdoers with the same ferocity we’re pursuing Osama bin Laden) In other words, if you’ve been cheating somebody we’re going to find you and hold you to account. (unless you’re a Republican Party campaign donor). And we’ll continue to do our part to help improve all aspects of the mortgage marketplace that is really important to this economy of ours.
With all the steps I’ve outlined today we will deliver help and hope to American families who need it. We’ll help guard against future problems in the housing sector. We’ll reaffirm the vital place of homeownership in our nation. When more families own their own homes, neighborhoods are more vibrant and communities are stronger, and more people have a stake in the future of this country.
Owning a home has always been at the center of the American Dream. Together with the United States Congress I will continue working to help make that dream a reality for more of our citizens. Thank you.
Q Sir, what about the hedge funds and banks that are overexposed on the sub-prime market? That’s a bigger problem. Have you got a plan?
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.(that’s already being taken care of by easing credit to banks and mortgage companies) Ahh,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,haaaa.
END 11:16 A.M. EDT

Posted by: Peris Troika | Sep 1 2007 3:57 utc | 74

Fisk

And then comes the cruncher in my friend’s letter. “I think that the Bush administration is looking for something to distract Americans before the mid-September report on progress in Iraq. And I believe that the pressure is building to do something about the sanctuaries for the Taliban and foreign fighters along the Pakistan/Afghanistan border…”
A few days after my friend’s letter arrived in Beirut, the Pakistanis reported that the Americans were using pilotless drones to attack targets just inside Pakistan. But it seems much more ambitious military plans may now be in the works. An all-out strike inside the North West Frontier province before President Pervez Musharref steps down – or is overthrown? A last throw of the dice at Bin Laden before “democracy” returns to Pakistan?

Posted by: b | Sep 1 2007 7:01 utc | 75

Responding to b’s post directly above. b quotes Robert Fisk quoting his friend’s letter, referring to USA escalation of Tension In The Middle East and the USA’s targeted goal.

I think that the Bush administration is looking for something to distract Americans before the mid-September report on progress in Iraq

If the goal is distraction of Americans, the threat of attacks on Iran are just as good as actually attacking Iran. (Fisk’s friend discusses USA planes over Pakistan.)
If the goal is really serious such as major in-country reform in the USA I say:
Whether due to a catastrophic failure of money, transportation or power due to faulty infrastructure, faulty policy, a real or orchestrated attack or natural disaster, or something else, or even dealing with a genuinely militant population, that might require the USA to begin another actual war that kills people to regain the dominant voice.
Of course they are killing people at an enormous rate in Iraq already.
Frankly the whole point of media manipulation these days is to scare us all.
I currently think the goal is met by the leaked threats that war is upcoming.
No war.
I find a strange attraction to our worst nightmares coming true and the infantile joy of joining in and saying I told you so!
About these rumours. It doesn’t serve anyone to expect the worst, possibly with the exception of potential military recruits. If I were them I’d probably leave town asap.

Posted by: jonku | Sep 1 2007 9:15 utc | 76

Taking a closer look at reports on what is going on in Pakistan, just to stay informed:
A Crucial Moment in Pakistan’s History

Pakistan is facing its worst political turmoil since President Pervez Musharraf vaulted to power in a bloodless coup in 1999. The fallout from the 2001 US-led invasion of Afghanistan has introduced al-Qa’ida and pro-Taliban elements into the lawless tribal belt along the Afghan border. A long-simmering nationalist insurgency is fighting the Pakistan army in the vast and resource-rich province of Baluchistan. And General Musharraf’s own popularity has plunged over recent months as calls for a restoration of democracy continue to grow.
To add to his discomfort, there is sustained pressure from Washington to clamp down harder on Islamist militants. Last month, President George Bush signalled his willingness to strike targets inside Pakistan, while declining to say that he would seek Islamabad’s consent. “With real actionable intelligence,” he said, “we will get the job done”.
But the Pakistan government has grown increasingly frustrated with criticism that it is not doing enough to curb the threat of terror.
“Those who say Pakistan is not doing enough do not appreciate the ground realities,” says the Information minister, Tariq Azim. “Today we have 87,000 soldiers in Waziristan.

Former PM Sharif Plans Return and Leadership Fight this Month

“There can be no deals with dictators because we are struggling for the restoration of undiluted democracy in Pakistan,” he said. “But [Bhutto] decided on another course and has entered into negotiations with Musharraf. The democratic forces in the country must not be trying to rescue the sinking ship of dictatorship. This is not the time to shake hands with dictatorship.”
The prospect of two of Pakistan’s most prominent opposition politicians returning from exile at a similar time will send shivers down the spine of Mr Musharraf, whose once seemingly unassailable rule is looking increasingly frail.

The Sharif Moment
What if Military Rule Ends in Pakistan?

Posted by: Bea | Sep 1 2007 11:09 utc | 77

Holy crap, did a state level government just rule against intrusive surveillance? Senate blocks mandatory ID implants in employees
Snip…

State Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto) proposed the measure after at least one company began marketing radio frequency identification devices for use in humans.
The devices, as small as a grain of rice, can be used by employers to identify workers. A scanner passing over a body part implanted with one can instantly identify the person.
“RFID is a minor miracle, with all sorts of good uses,” Simitian said. “But we shouldn’t condone forced ‘tagging’ of humans. It’s the ultimate invasion of privacy.”
Simitian said he fears that the devices could be compromised by persons with unauthorized scanners, facilitating identity theft and improper tracking and surveillance.
The bill has been approved by the state Assembly and now goes to the governor.
Nine senators opposed the measure, including Bob Margett (R-Arcadia), who said it is premature to legislate technology that has not yet proved to be a problem. “It sounded like it was a solution looking for a problem,” Margett said. “It didn’t seem like it was necessary.”
One company, VeriChip, has been licensed by the Food and Drug Administration to sell implanted identification devices, and about 2,000 people have had them implanted, Simitian said. A representative of the firm did not return calls seeking comment Thursday.
CityWatcher.com, a Cincinnati video surveillance company, has required employees who work in its secure data center to have a microchip implanted in an arm.

Oh… okay. They voted against employers mandating this kind of thing from their workers. I wonder if it will still be a “solution looking for a problem” when the feds use it to fight “terrorists”.
I’m fair certain I already linked to the story about how US security firms are already using China as a guinea pig selling human tracking technology to the Chinese… here it is again: High-Tech China Tracking Citizen Movement – U.S Not Far Behind. Sleep tight.

Posted by: Monolycus | Sep 1 2007 11:31 utc | 78

Highly qualified …
As Her Star Wanes, Rice Tries to Reshape Legacy

[T]hose talking points were interspersed with grumbling that she was being asked for personal reflection, something she does not like to do, preferring instead to work through times of personal turmoil on the piano, with Brahms.
In fact, her friends say that she rarely questions whether she is right or wrong, instead choosing to believe in a particular truth with absolute certainty until she doesn’t believe it anymore, at which point she moves on.

Posted by: b | Sep 1 2007 13:49 utc | 79

Fuck their legacies.
[sorry]

Posted by: beq | Sep 1 2007 15:36 utc | 80

b, that link is a wealth of info.
Today, Ms. Rice, 52, continues to have far more star appeal than any other of Mr. Bush’s top advisers.
lol. which is one way of saying she is less hated?
personally, i think this is one of those ‘we are revving up for regime change articles. in a subltle way of course, which nyt does so well.

Ms. Rice has also come under fire for her abandonment of her onetime passion: the administration’s stated quest for democracy in the Muslim world.
….
“Rice was one of the most passionate defenders of democracy, but it’s been overtaken by this State Department agenda of getting along with dictators,
….
“Her strategy is to just keep knocking on this door, without a strategy, making it up as she goes along in an effort to put something together,”
….
“If she pulls a rabbit out of her hat …. some kind of political compromise in Iraq, it could partially salvage her legacy,”

i thought the following added a really nice touch? no..
On the morning of the Times interview, she had just returned to the State Department from a private tour of the National Archives, which she said she had always wanted to see. A morning with the Emancipation Proclamation, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution, she said, gave her a different perspective on legacy.
barf

“I watched the president standing in front of an American and Afghan flag, and I thought, the American president can now stand in front of an American and Iraqi flag, an American and Lebanese flag, and American and Palestinian flag,” she said. “I think in six years to have helped to foster those changes, even if they’re incomplete, even if they’re tough, even if there’s still work to be done — just think about those pictures.”
“Those are pretty dramatic changes,” she said.

unreal

Posted by: annie | Sep 1 2007 15:52 utc | 81

21st Century May Belong to the Shrub
[it’s not what you’re thinking. or is it… :-)]

BROOKLIN, Canada, Sep 1 (IPS) – As atmospheric carbon dioxide levels continue to climb shrubs and other woody plants will likely dominate grasslands, altering pastoral lifestyles around the world, a U.S. study has found.
In the first experiment of its kind done on native grassland, U.S. scientists artificially doubled carbon dioxide (CO2) levels over enclosed sections of prairie in Colorado, a state in the western United States, for five years. To their surprise, one shrub species, Artemisia frigida — commonly known as fringed sage — thrived under those conditions. In fact, it grew 40 times faster than normal, dominating other plant species.
“This kind of response to higher CO2 levels is almost unprecedented,” said Jack Morgan, a plant physiologist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and lead author of the study, published Aug. 28 in the ‘Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences’ (PNAS), a science journal.
“Fringed sage is a minor species on the landscape normally. We were not expecting to see this,” Morgan told IPS.

Although the extent of the response was surprising, the fact that shrubs do better with more CO2 is not a new finding, he added.
Shrubs and other woody plants like trees can use CO2 more efficiently than grasses: they have deeper roots than grasses, enabling them to tap into deeper water supplies. These supplies, along with sunlight and CO2, are used to produce glucose energy for growth through photosynthesis.

The effects of elevated CO2 may already be in play, as indicated by fairly consistent evidence of “bush encroachment” or “shrub encroachment” in many grasslands of the world, he added.

Posted by: b real | Sep 1 2007 16:20 utc | 82

a couple items on AFRICOM
as the SADC (so. african dev community) this week made public its rejection of a u.s. military presence on the continent, zambia’s president — also the chair of the SADC — becomes the first to affirm his nation’s opposition to AFRICOM bases.
Zambia refuses US military base

The Zambian government has turned down a request by the United States to establish a military base in the South African country.
“As Zambia, we will not be giving sanctuary and I think I can speak on behalf of the SADC region that none of us is interested,’ said President Mwanawasa, while rejecting United States’ plan to establish a military base in his country.

still, zambia partners w/ the u.s. in at least two programs — african contingency operations training assistance (ACOTA) and int’l military education & training (IMET) — and has agreements w/ the u.s. to allow military planes to refuel at zambian airstrips (“lily pads”).
unfortunately for africans, their “opinions” don’t fall under the command’s mandate for establishing itself, so it will be interesting, to say the least, watching how this unfolds.
meanwhile, a new command means an opportunity for all kinds of new acronyms & creative(?) code names.
the marines are already on top of it
Marine role in Africa Command takes shape

Marine Forces Africa will split off from Marine Forces Europe to support AfriCom when it does attain full operational capability, said Gunnery Sgt. Donald Preston, a MarForEur spokesman working with the AfriCom Transition Team.
MarForAf will include about 100 Marines, but it’s still unclear if a portion or all of it will be based in Africa, or remain in Europe, he said.
Instead of having a battalion or regiments assigned to MarForAf, the Marine command will instead act like MarForEur and have access to active and Reserve forces for training or operational missions, Preston said.
Marines from a wide range of job fields including intelligence, logistics and communications have already started to report to Stuttgart, Germany, where MarForEur is based and the AfriCom Transition Team is stationed, Preston said.
Roughly 15 Marines are on the transition team, consisting of more than 100 active-duty and civilian personnel, with more than 30 more Marines on the way, said Vince Crawley, spokesman for the AfriCom Transition Team.
Once AfriCom becomes fully operational, Marines can expect more joint exercises such as Africa Lion and Shared Accord, Preston said.

Posted by: b real | Sep 1 2007 16:49 utc | 83

and in mogadishu, the TFG’s “national reconciliation conference” wrapped on thursday. other than in stmts from conference organizer’s, word is that, as expected, it didn’t really accomplish anything.
AFP: No progress after six weeks of peace talks

MOGADISHU (AFP) – Talks aimed at ending 16 years of conflict in Somalia were due to wrap up yesterday, with diplomats saying the parley had made no progress after six weeks of marathon negotiations.
As about 2 500 delegates and observers gathered for a closing ceremony in northern Mogadishu amid tight security, diplomats called for a new approach to solve Somalia’s chronic anarchy.
“We know this conference has gone nowhere. The problem is blind confidence in the transitional federal government,” a foreign diplomat said…

IRIN: Opinions mixed as reconciliation conference winds up

Organisers of Somalia’s national reconciliation conference hailed the meeting as a success even as analysts expressed doubts over the outcome, saying major parties in the current crisis had been left out of the peace-making process.

According to analysts, however, the conference did not achieve much and failed in its main task of reconciliation. “Reconciliation is the most urgent priority for Somalia but the TFG defined it in deliberately narrow terms, related to clans only. The conference achieved very little since none of the key issues essential to restoring security, as well as a broader peace, was discussed,” said Salim Lone, a newspaper columnist and political commentator based in Nairobi, Kenya.
Timothy Othieno, Horn of Africa analyst at the Institute for Global Dialogue in Johannesburg, described the conference as “a total failure” because of the way the participants were chosen and the arbitrary tactics of the TFG. “The TFG determined who was going to attend and who wasn’t. You cannot place conditions on participants if you are trying to reconcile a nation.”
The Hawiye clan, the dominant group in Mogadishu, and the Union of Islamic Courts (UIC) were left out of the process, he said. “This indeed signalled the end of the ‘conference’ even before it began,” Othieno said. The TFG forgot that it was an interim government created to “to facilitate a process that would legitimise whoever is chosen by the people – via credible elections”, he added.

the TFG didn’t “forget” anything.
an alternative conference, hosted in asmara, eritrea, and comprised of the ICU, members of the diaspora, and a range of somalis opposed to the occupation of their country was initially to begin today, though it has now been delayed for a bit.

The conference was intended to unite diverse groups who oppose Somalia’s interim government and vehemently object to the presence of its Ethiopian military backers on Somali soil.
But various delegates had not arrived in Eritrea, and the agenda was still not properly prepared, diplomats said.
“I think they need a few more days to work out exactly how they’re going to handle this conference,” said one Western diplomat who tracks Somalia closely. “The main rallying flag is going to be ‘get the Ethiopian troops out’, that’s for sure.”

a recent diaspora community communiqué provides an idea of the communique to come out of the asmara conference once it gets underway

1- The Diaspora recognizes that Somalia is not a free country but a country under Ethiopian occupation and that the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) is a quisling of Ethiopia and is thus incapable of independent action. The TFG has utterly failed and is totally irrelevant. Thus the international community should not waste time or resources on propping it.
2- Ethiopia must completely and unconditionally withdraw from Somalia, and the withdrawal must be verified by neutral governments or organizations.
3- We commit ourselves to the liberation of our homeland from the illegal occupation of Ethiopia by using all necessary means, political or otherwise.
4- International peacekeepers, drawn outside of the frontline states, should be deployed as soon as possible. The peace-keepers must have a clear mandate of peacekeeping and a timetable for their withdrawal. It is also paramount to find a genuine political solution for the Somali crisis.
5- We believe in the establishment of a broad-based inclusive government based on justice, freedom of expression and respect for human rights. Such government should not be a threat to international security nor to the security of its neighbours. We call upon all peace loving and friendly countries to help establish such a government.

Posted by: b real | Sep 1 2007 17:18 utc | 84

beq
fuck their legacies
in a just world – their legacies would be an appearance, a process & then confinement for life at the hague with the other criminals who make of war – their world
rice’s crimes are no different from the others & in fact she is responsible for facillitating the worst of the criminal conduct
the more you reflect the more you understand their particular kind of vileness & venality

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 1 2007 17:52 utc | 85

they all deserve their totally fucked legacies. their legacies are toast.
no matter how they try spinning it, they are all criminals and will be remembered a such.

Posted by: annie | Sep 1 2007 18:39 utc | 86

jj,
A few months before the closing was announced, the American History professor gave the speech at the Annual Faculty Lecture, where she described Antioch’s teaching as in opposition to neoliberalism (very proud to see that, as I was on the committee that hired her!). In fact, I’m gonna try to pull it from some of the emails and get it linked on the website. A brief sample:

For the past 30 years, we have existed in a world dominated by a conservative discourse regarding global capitalism. Not only has the discourse supported this growth, the U.S. political system actively facilitated the dramatic resurgence and expansion of unregulated corporate dominance. Neo-liberalism promised to reduce poverty not just within the United States, but across the world. To that end, large corporations were given free reign, and international institutions like the World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank compelled countries in the global south to adopt their oppressive structural adjustment agendas. The minimal regulatory state was largely dismantled, and capital was encouraged to flow in all directions. In large sections of society, that message was greeted with enthusiasm. Americans were encouraged to buy with literally reckless abandon as access to credit became irresponsibly easy.
While conservatives pushed neo-liberalism, Antioch faculty, students and alumni have continued to critically analyze and challenge it. One very simple example was an enlightening discussion we had in class one day recently about a corporate message found in newspaper fliers and on the trucks shipping merchandise for Target, a national big box chain. The company?s simple slogan ?Expect More, Pay Less,? encapsulates this new global order. Americans are told that they deserve more than anyone else and they should get it for less money. The presumption of American dominance is effectively reinforced at the same time that the wheels of consumer capitalism are greased.

She goes on to describe the specific professors and classes taught which try to counter the neoliberal framework, but since that includes professors’ names, not quite certain I want to post it yet.
In terms of brainstorming things that Antioch can do moving forward, yes! especially on sustainability and countering peak oil – or whatever energy crisis ends up happening. Lots of people are pushing for that. I’m trying to get a wiki up for brainstorming a vision of what the Antioch of the future could look like, so that alums and Friends of Antioch can pour their ideas out in a place where it can and should be read. Gotta think big for the grant money, and we’ve got a lot of people thinking big, but we have to work to get all those ideas in a coherent place.
In terms of the sister progressive liberal arts colleges, the Reeds and Oberlins and Hampshires and billmon’s own Evergreen, they actually seem to be doing reasonably well. However, at the lower level of the liberal arts, there is a crisis. Apparently some 74 small liberal arts colleges have closed in recent years.

Posted by: Rowan | Sep 1 2007 18:51 utc | 87

Is there a blog/s, websites, etc. about what’s going on at Antioch, Rowan?
Thanks for your contributions. Keep us up to date with what is happening. It is very important.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 1 2007 19:34 utc | 88

Antioch University

Posted by: pb | Sep 1 2007 22:54 utc | 89

http://www.antiochians.org is the home site of the Alumni movement. It’s going through some growing pains, but news is put up there pretty consistently. The student/community newspaper is at http://www.recordonline.org, and as a former editor of that paper, it’s really exciting to see it in the hands of some dynamic current students. I also may move back to Yellow Springs, Ohio, and perhaps blog from there. I’ll let y’all know if so.
The news on Antiochians is somewhat lacking in context, though, which is one of my main goals as “newsletter editor.” I’m putting together pamphlets to try to get people up to speed as quickly as I can, though they’re primarily aimed at alums. The initial batch, is up here. There’s a timeline of the closing, the Revival resolution from the Reunion a few weeks after the closing, my writeup on how we organized at Reunion, an analysis of the poor decision-making that led to the closure, and some specifics on the disastrous “Renewal Plan” that was the final straw.
For a non-Antiochian audience, the most interesting, in my mind, is one written by a current faculty member on the importance of tenure at Antioch and in general, which can be found here. The faculty view this as an attempt to bust their tenure, for a variety of reasons, which this partially explains.
I’ll try to write a “story so far” for non-Antiochians, which I want to do for you guys, and because we need to have one written for the Revival movement to go forward.

Posted by: Rowan | Sep 1 2007 23:34 utc | 90

I’d also certainly be interested in reading what you have on Antioch, Rowan, as I almost went there, and still may if they were to work it out and keep it open.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 2 2007 0:47 utc | 91

the rest of the article doesn’t do anything for me, but i was surprised to see the role of the u.s. in the rise of the islamic courts last year mentioned so unambiguously in a reuters story on somalia

In June last year, warlords — backed by the United States but despised locally — were run out of Mogadishu by the SICC with decisive victories giving them total control.

reuters rpts on somalia tend to be uncritically biased w/ the u.s. worldview & that of its ethiopian proxy or ethiopia’s TFG proxy.
one of the reasons that the u.s. is spinning hard on eritrea these days is b/c the eritrean govt is not afraid to speak out on the crimes, hypocrisy & double-standards of u.s. policies & rhetoric. the latest editorial from the eritrean ministry of information —
Securing Global Dominance: US Administration’s Impractical Dream

The world is now going through a dangerous and at the same time an eye-opening period under the dominance of the world’s super power, the United States. A handful of capitalists controlling the political and economic resources as well as the military and intelligence organizations of the US are subjecting billions of people to conflict and unrest in an attempt to secure the world’s resources for their own use by applying a brutal Machiavellian principle of ‘the end justifies the means’.

Washington’s masterminds who outlined US geo-political strategy for securing complete dominance through power ideology often try to cover up their conspiracies with peacekeeping missions and seek to present their country as the acme of perfection in democracy and respect of human rights. However, the world can be fooled no longer and people have become aware that the US Administration’s blind pursuit to secure its own interests above all else is in fact a gross violation of their basic rights as well as international laws and principles.
The US mission of promoting ‘democracy and respect of human rights’ is merely a cover up for its conspiratorial actions in creating a crisis and then perfecting the art of ‘crisis management’. US officials have no other mission but to compromise the sovereignty and national interests of others, instigate religious conflict in the name of religious rights and create divergence and conflict among peoples.
It has been clear for sometime now that the US national security strategy of weakening and intimidating other people to establish dominance is impractical. It has not only failed to subjugate people and secure submission but also backfired on the US itself. There is no force in the world that can defeat the unity of the people, although this fact does not seem to have been taken into account on the part of the US Administration. The current instability in the Horn of Africa created as a result of US interference and the resulting popular opposition is one of the many examples verifying the failure of Washington’s misguided geo-political strategy.

Posted by: b real | Sep 2 2007 3:51 utc | 92

For Uncle $cam:
Welcome to the Panopticon
And then there is this tidbit from the comments section:
In a less dramatic example of the irrationality of absolutism in managerial control, Shoshana Zuboff, a professor at the Harvard Business School, reported on her experience as a consultant for a number of paper factories at a time when computer controls were first being introduced throughout the industry. In one factory, which she called Tiger Creek Mill, the computer system was initially accessible by everybody, including the workers on the production line. Workers could see the same information on costs and prices as management. At first, the workers used their new found information to make very profitable modifications of the production process (Zuboff 1988, pp. 255 67).
Economic theory and business logic would have us expect that management would reward these workers for contributing to the profitability of the corporation. Instead, management, horrified by the possibility that workers were going to make managerial control at least partially irrelevant, quickly cut off the workers’ access to the system. Control turned out to have more allure than profits.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 2 2007 4:50 utc | 93

Uncle, we’re gonna need students. Lots of them, and soon, when we win. When that is is somewhat up in the air, but hey, what isn’t.
Anyway – how Antioch died, Cliff’s notes version. How it will be resurrected coming soon, hopefully.
Antioch College was opened in 1853, with educational pioneer Horace Mann as its first president. It was the first college to allow women and men on an equal basis, and had a female professor with equivalent pay to her male counterparts. During Mann’s commencement speech of 1859, shortly before his death, he uttered the phrase that became Antioch’s motto: “Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity.”
In 1919, the College was in dire financial straits, and appointed innovative industrialist Arthur Morgan to the Board of Trustees. Morgan quickly became President, and initiated a series of changes, none more radical than the “co-operative education program” where every other term, students would work at jobs, then return to study. The co-op program, widely copied in modern America, became Antioch’s main claim to fame.
After World War II, and through the mid-70’s, Antioch College thrived, with upwards of 2000 students and a national reputation as an elite liberal arts college. Many of the most famous alumni came from this period: Eleanor Holmes Norton, Stephen Jay Gould, Rod Serling, and Coretta Scott King.
During the mid-60’s, a series of satellite campuses were purchased or founded all over the country. Most failed and disappeared. The unsustainable growth of both the College’s student body and the satellite campuses caused crisis after crisis in the 70’s, with the end result being the collapse of the amount of students and the acknowledgment that the graduate programs and satellite campuses made Antioch a University.
After wobbling through the 80’s, damaging the endowment through the maintenance of the College and the (now 5) University campuses, the 90s saw Antioch’s last major PR event, the anti-date rape Sexual Offense Prevention Policy. This shockingly radical policy based around the concept that partners should make sure that both parties want to have sex before they do have sex, the patriarchal media firestorm severely damaged Antioch’s reputation in the mainstream media.
More importantly to Antioch’s long-term future, the President of the College changed the basic relationship between the campuses from having the College at the center, to the “federal” system by which the College was supposed to be “first among equals.” However, the system never was equal – the other university campuses, primarily adult or graduate programs, always had a higher profit ratio than the full residential liberal arts college. The University Board of Trustees, meanwhile began to be dominated by businesspeople used to cutting unprofitable parts of their organization, culminating the the October 2002 decision to scrap Antioch’s Socially Responsible Investment Policy and invest…in a hedge fund.
The beginning of the end for Antioch College occurred in 2001-2002, when a slow economy caused a budget deficit. The Board of Trustees and the University leadership instituted a Financial Stabilization and Consolidation plan. The crux of this was that the College lost control of its own finances, and found itself saddled with a crippling annual depreciation bill. For the next few years, every spring found the College with a new budget crisis, causing hiring freezes or the firing of essential staff.
The meddling of the Board of Trustees continued in 03-04, when they announced a Renewal Plan, a massive curricular overhaul designed to make Antioch more marketing and fix a student retention problem. The Renewal’s combination of educational innovation and lowered costs (such as a higher student:faculty ratio) appealed to the Board, and it was imposed entirely from above on a skeptical faculty and campus community. Despite their reservations, the community worked to implement the Plan, a project initially slated to take two years. The Board mandated that the Renewal be pushed through in one year, with predictably disastrous results. Enrollment plummeted, from a slowly growing 650-700 students to half that. This was expected, and the Board had promised that they would provide the money for five years of the Renewal.
Lower-than-expected enrollment the next year, however, somehow changed the Board’s minds, and they pulled the plug on the Renewal in June, 2007, declaring financial exigency, and that the College was “suspending operations” and would reopen better than ever in 2012.
The popular narrative that Antioch was “too liberal” for the marketplace falls apart under any reasonable examination. The real explanation for Antioch College’s almost-demise lies in an increasingly authoritarian, hidden, and unaccountable University decision-making process, which was taken over by money-first businesspeople. As their decisions weakened and crippled the College, they systematically removed any recourse within the system that the College had. The two most devastating decisions in recent Antioch history, the Financial Stabilization plan and the hurried implementation of the Renewal were both run over a College under an interim President. The University lost its attachment to Antioch College’s core values of shared governance and social justice, and the College paid the price.

Posted by: Rowan | Sep 2 2007 4:51 utc | 94

Rowan:
Is there any truth to the claim (which I heard on NPR — I know, not a very reliable source) that:
a) Antioch opened too many satellite campus, which ran down the endowment, leaving it exposed to financial crisis.
b) These satellites were actually not liberal enough, not as much as the college had been, which diluted the overall reputation of the institution, giving it less uniqueness and making it less attractive.
******
On a similar note:
Right now, I am working within the food co-op movement, which is trying to aggressively open as many co-ops nationwide as possible. This is a good thing — except that I see integrity being sacrificed in the name of growth (We’ll open, then we’ll be more transparent and develop our ties to the community…). My concern is that this strategy will damage the reputation of food co-ops everywhere, providing short-term apparent success, but leading to longer term problems.

Posted by: Malooga | Sep 2 2007 5:11 utc | 95

The first is generally accepted, though the endowment damage is up for interpretation. The College, of course, claims that, and because of that, the satellite campuses “owe” the College money every year. Think of it like a colony – founded to make the motherland money, rebelling and refusing to send the money. On the other hand, Arthur Morgan apparently preferred that Colleges have small endowments, and make their money off of entreprenuerialism.
On the second note, yes, kind of. I’d say that they were too capitalist, if you want to call that non-liberal (which I wouldn’t, but I could understand the argument). I do think that the brand was underestimated, especially the shared governance aspects of it. The other campuses were run much more hierarchically, without the “Community Government” concept which Antioch College depends on. Faculty have no tenure, and virtually no say in the governance structure. This is the kind of thing which I tend to put outside normal liberal/conservative structures. Radical/progressive/anarchist/libertarian.
In terms of your food co-ops…I’ve never heard of an organization operating in a non-transparent fashion, then voluntarily making things more transparent when they think they’re settled. So I’d agree with you.

Posted by: Rowan | Sep 2 2007 6:27 utc | 96

@92
and if Eritrea is allowed to get away with dissing USA, who knows which other African country might be next.
somebody better remind Eritrea that Iraqs slot in the axis of evil is currently vacant

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Sep 2 2007 7:06 utc | 97

@Rowan
Next time you’re out in Glen Helen or lifting a glass at The Trail, give me a passing thought. I miss that area.
@Noirette/Tangerine
Can I get some commentary on this story… Swiss deportation policy draws criticism
Snip…

GENEVA – The campaign poster was blatant in its xenophobic symbolism: Three white sheep kicking out a black sheep over a caption that read “for more security.” The message was not from a fringe force in Switzerland’s political scene but from its largest party.
The nationalist Swiss People’s Party is proposing a deportation policy that anti-racism campaigners say evokes Nazi-era practices. Under the plan, entire families would be expelled if their children are convicted of a violent crime, drug offenses or benefits fraud.
The party is trying to collect the 100,000 signatures needed to force a referendum on the issue. If approved in a referendum, the law would be the only one of its kind in Europe.
“We believe that parents are responsible for bringing up their children. If they can’t do it properly, they will have to bear the consequences,” Ueli Maurer, president of the People’s Party, told The Associated Press.
Ronnie Bernheim of the Swiss Foundation against Racism and Anti-Semitism said the proposal was similar to the Nazi practice of “Sippenhaft” — or kin liability — whereby relatives of criminals were held responsible for his or her crimes and punished equally.
Similar practices occurred during Stalin’s purges in the early days of the Soviet Union and the 1966-76 Cultural Revolution in China, when millions were persecuted for their alleged ideological failings.
“As soon as the first 10 families and their children have been expelled from the country, then things will get better at a stroke,” said Maurer, whose party controls the Justice Ministry and shares power in an unwieldy coalition that includes all major parties.
He explained that his party has long campaigned to make deportation compulsory for convicted immigrants rather than an optional and rarely applied punishment.
The party claims foreigners — who make up about 20 percent of the population — are four times more likely to commit crimes than Swiss nationals.

Is this truly coming from a majority in Switzerland or is this piece giving misrepresentative weight to a vocal minority?

Posted by: Monolycus | Sep 2 2007 10:50 utc | 98

rowan- you should consider writing something up for b to put on the front page. it’ll get more attention there & provide a dedicated place for comments & any updates on the story.

Posted by: b real | Sep 2 2007 16:35 utc | 99

jony_b_cool @97
the 2002 NSS makes it clear that world security will exist only when every country on the planet accepts empire’s view of terror. regimes w/ a different perspective, therefore, must be removed by any means necessary.

Posted by: b real | Sep 2 2007 19:51 utc | 100