Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
July 19, 2007
OT 07-50

Fresh news & views …

Comments

Hmm – al’Qaeda is in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia … but now its in Pakistan!
“Let’s bomb Pakistan!” – says the WaPo Editorial board:

If Pakistani forces cannot — or will not — eliminate the sanctuary, President Bush must order targeted strikes or covert actions by American forces, as he has done several times in recent years. Such actions run the risk of further destabilizing Pakistan. Yet those risks must be weighed against the consequences of another large-scale attack on U.S. soil. “Direct intervention against the sanctuary in Afghanistan apparently must have seemed . . . disproportionate to the threat,” the Sept. 11 commission noted. The United States must not repeat that tragic misjudgment.

Lunatics …

Posted by: b | Jul 19 2007 7:28 utc | 1

Security Secretary Michael Chertoff makes a good point:No one who has been following the news should have been surprised by the conclusion of U.S. intelligence agencies that al-Qaeda is growing stronger and that the threat that it will stage another major attack against the U.S. homeland is a serious one.
excuse me, cough….. i couldn’t even make it thru the opening w/out expressing the absurdity of this statement!
one week jerkcoff has a ‘gut feeling’ and the next week “No one “ who’s anyone (meaning you might as well live in a cave if you don’t know AQ is gonna maybe get us… this summer) still believes we’re safe.
ok, i will read the rest of the article now

Posted by: annie | Jul 19 2007 7:42 utc | 2

Kristi Stassinopoulou, “The Secrets of the Rocks” (YouTube)

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 19 2007 8:21 utc | 3

Kristi Stassinopoulou, “The Secrets of the Rocks” (YouTube)

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 19 2007 8:21 utc | 4

Leader of Al Qaeda group in Iraq was fictional, U.S. military says

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 19 2007 8:31 utc | 5

Guess this makes it official now, Iraq now has a unified nationalist resistance movement, which is incidentally also, anti AQinM and anti USAinM.

Posted by: Anonymous | Jul 19 2007 8:54 utc | 6

CNN:”Transformer blast rattles Manhattan
A transformer explosion Wednesday caused panic in midtown Manhattan. “We saw hundreds and hundreds of people running down Third Avenue. They were screaming, they were crying,”
Many people dont need anymore ALQaida, to get panic. The terrorism is in our minds.

Posted by: cur | Jul 19 2007 8:56 utc | 7

and anti BAATHIST too.

Posted by: Anonymous | Jul 19 2007 9:02 utc | 8

Many people dont need anymore ALQaida, to get panic. The terrorism is in our minds.
Posted by: cur | Jul 19, 2007 4:56:50 AM | 7

How true I wonder how Mr. Chertoff’s gut is holding up under the strain.
OSAMA BIN STEAMEN ATTACKS BIG APPLE!

Posted by: Erdla | Jul 19 2007 9:35 utc | 9

@6 – the Guradian story about the “united” Iraqi resistance is a bit fishy.
Can someone explain this quote for me?

Abu Ahmad, spokesman for Iraqi Hamas said: “Peaceful resistance will not end the occupation. The US made clear it intended to stay for many decades. Now it is a common view in the resistance that they will start to withdraw within a year.”

So the guy thinks the US will stay but withdraw?

Posted by: b | Jul 19 2007 11:32 utc | 10

Gosh, I miss Billmon.

Posted by: Anonymous | Jul 19 2007 13:10 utc | 11

b #10,
It seems a bit fishy to me too. Not that quote in particular, but the whole story appears as if Seumas Milne, writing from Damascus, is perhaps, in an opposite way of those such as Judas Miller, acting more as a stenographer than a journalist.
The story lacks depth and details.

Posted by: Rick | Jul 19 2007 13:23 utc | 12

Saeb Erekat (sp) on Al Jazeera this afternoon: in the 4 minutes I could bear to watch, mentioned the “illegal coup d’etat” by Hamas about 7 times. He was designated as “chief negotiator” for the new “peace talks”. Looking very rich and spiffy and trying out his “talking points”. I could just sigh, but think I will tear my hair out instead. Orwell would die, if only…

Posted by: ww | Jul 19 2007 16:35 utc | 13

Gosh, I am so thankful for b.
if Billmon were an orange, b is an apple.
and I like both.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Jul 19 2007 17:05 utc | 14

pour b real – comrade chavez

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jul 19 2007 17:47 utc | 15

have image, will travel
Richard Branson forms a band of ‘Elders’ with Mandela, Carter, Tutu and others

JOHANNESBURG: Melding serious statesmanship and a large slug of audacity, the former South African president Nelson Mandela and a clutch of world-famous figures plan to announce on Wednesday a private alliance to launch diplomatic assaults on the globe’s most intractable problems.
The alliance, to be unveiled on Wednesday during events marking Mandela’s 89th birthday, is to be called “The Elders.” Among others, it includes the retired Anglican archbishop Desmond Tutu; Jimmy Carter, the former U.S. president; the retired United Nations secretary general Kofi Annan, and Mary Robinson, the human-rights activist and former president of Ireland.

Mandela states in remarks prepared for Wednesday that the fact that none of The Elders holds public office allows them to work for the common good, not for outside interests.
“This group can speak freely and boldly, working both publicly and behind the scenes on whatever actions need to be taken,” the remarks state. “Together we will work to support courage where there is fear, foster agreement where there is conflict, and inspire hope where there is despair.”
Whether governments that become the objects of The Elders’ freelance diplomacy will agree remains to be seen. One of the group’s founders and principal sponsors, the British tycoon Sir Richard Branson, said that those leaders whom he had briefed – including Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Britain and the South African president, Thabo Mbeki – “very much support the initiative.”
“There will always be skeptics of any positive initiatives, but these are people giving up their time for nothing,” he said of The Elders. “Most individuals in the world would welcome a group of people who are above ego, who, in the last 12 or 15 years of their lives, are above partisan politics.”
Precisely what problems The Elders will tackle is unclear; none have yet been selected.

Posted by: b real | Jul 19 2007 17:48 utc | 16

pinr: Somalia’s Compromised National Reconciliation Conference

Put in the bluntest terms — and they are justified — the N.R.C. is a nuanced yet simple power play by the T.F.G. executive to maintain its position by keeping international financial, military and diplomatic support; keeping the Ethiopian occupation in place barring the deployment of an adequate African Union (A.U.) or preferably U.N. peacekeeping force; and controlling the electoral process that is supposed to result in a permanent government and is mandated to take place in 2009.

shabelle: Somalia peace talks under mortar attacks

Mogadishu 19, July.07 ( Sh.M.Network)- Insurgents fired more than five mortar bombs at the venue of Somalia’s national reconciliation conference in the capital. Residents in Behani where the congress is taking place said number of mortars hit the areas surrounding the venue of the conference in north of the capital.
The blasts shook the neighborhood, forcing some the people to flee to other areas, witnesses said.
“Explosions rocked entire Behani neighborhood minutes after the conference was concluded,” said our reporter, Muktar Hirabe, who was covering the conference on Thursday.
It is not clear if there any casualties.

Posted by: b real | Jul 19 2007 18:02 utc | 17

My link#6&8,
I don’t know about the contradictions in the text, but it could just be how the public face for the consolidation was developed, or reported. Nonetheless, Marc Lynch is taking the development seriously, and he follows the resistance groups pretty closely.

Posted by: anna missed | Jul 19 2007 19:35 utc | 18

Rubbish Bin Mercenary Supervisor Shot in Iraq, what a Monty Python Joke

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jul 19 2007 21:47 utc | 19

Latest Executive Order and Abuse of Power
Contrast linked document with the fifth amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. Discuss.

Posted by: Monolycus | Jul 19 2007 23:08 utc | 20

Do you mean fourth amendment?
What about the first amendment?
I’ve got the tools, said Bush.
That EO is what I came here to post a link to with a request for discussion.
Deep shit. Deep shit. Deep shit.

Posted by: rjj | Jul 19 2007 23:19 utc | 21

Never mind. I read carelessly.

Posted by: rjj | Jul 19 2007 23:33 utc | 22

well, shrub lives in public housing already. what are we going to be able to take?

Posted by: b real | Jul 20 2007 0:35 utc | 23

So Rupert is going to buy the Wall St Journal. This take over has been touted for a few months now and although various gold plated Bancroft heirs to the Dow_Jones empire have been resisting , like all rich, they are pragmatistic and no one wants to to risk their trust fund on an plainly out-moded concept like media diversity.
I’m rather hoping that young Christopher Bancroft does continue to try and block the sale. Not, I should hasten to add, because I think that it would prevent Murdoch from taking over the WSJ, because it wouldn’t, but because, and this is why I imagine he is under considerable pressure to withdraw his obstruction, the lawsuit from shareholders may succeed, thereby abolishing one of the most pernicious methods of corporate control that the ruling class utilize.
The majority of stock-holders in the Dow Jones Corporation (publishers of the WSJ) have no say in whether the offer will be accepted or not, just as they have less say in the composition of the board of directors or corporate strategy. This is because when the Bancroft family decided to turn their little family nest egg into a public corporation, they created two classes of stock, and with that, two classes of stock holder. The first class of stock, owned primarily by the Bancrofts and their family trusts, gets 10 votes per share and didn’t have to put any capital into the already thriving corporation, while the second class had to pour in the billions, but gets only 1 vote per share.
There are around 84 million Dow Jones shares in total, 64 million are class ‘A’ shares which control 1 vote per share, and 20 million are class ‘B’ shares which allow 10 votes per share. So approx. three quarters of the stock holds around one quarter of the votes. I love the Class ‘A’ and Class ‘B’ touch. Class ‘B’ is the superior stock. About 70 years ago some corporate lawyer must have had a black sense of humour.
There are other major corporations with similar equity structures. Thus far no one has successfully challenged this plainly unfair and possibly illegal structure. I know of a number of instances where this tiered system has been blatantly abused to rip off ‘ordinary’ shareholders. That may change if the Bancrofts continue to obstruct.
However obstruction is going to be difficult. Young Christopher Bancroft, a self styled investment adviser, is reportedly having a great deal of difficulty in persuading any money lenders to lend him enough to buy up sufficient Class B stock and block the deal. Funny that! Odd considering complete control of Dow Jones could be wrought with a very low (relatively speaking of course) investment. Murdoch cannot do the same. If he or another ‘outsider’ buys the Class B stock they lose their preferential voting rights and it becomes 1 share 1 vote stock.
The Class A shareholders who have seen the value of their stock nearly triple to over $60 a share since Rupert made the offer stand to lose a great deal as there are no other interested buyers. If the News Corp offer is unsuccessful the price will plummet. So they would probably sue the Bancroft obstructionists. Rupert Murdoch is not a bloke to take no for an answer and he is also not a bloke that mere judges; be they State, Federal or even Supreme Court judges; care to contradict. It is difficult to conceive the suit being unsuccessful.
If the lawsuit was successful, the multi-tier (there are sometimes 3 or even 4 ‘classes’ of shareholder) corporate equity structure would be dealt a serious, possibly fatal blow. Along with the ruling elite’s ability to rule. The contentiousness of this issue is revealed in the article I linked to which emphatically decrees that such a lawsuit would be unsuccessful. Journalists are judges? That does not reflect other corporate lawyers’ opinions, nor does it consider the power Murdoch holds – much less the naked use of that power which he attempts, but fails to conceal:
How Murdoch had a hotline to the PM in the run-up to Iraq war

Tony Blair had three conversations with the media magnate Rupert Murdoch in the nine days before the start of the Iraq war, the Government has disclosed.
Details of the former prime minister’s contacts with Mr Murdoch have been released under the Freedom of Information Act. After trying to block disclosure for four years, the Government backed down in a surprise change of heart the day after Mr Blair resigned last month.
Requests for information under the Act were submitted by the Liberal Democrat peer Lord Avebury and The Independent journalist James Macintyre. An appeal was pending and evidence was about to be served in a case before an Information Tribunal.
Yesterday the Cabinet Office said there were six telephone discussions between Mr Blair and Mr Murdoch in 20 months, all at crucial moments of his premiership. The subject of their calls was not revealed. . . “

So during the run up to the illegal invasion of Iraq, English Prime Minister Tony Bliar was communicating frequently with Murdoch including on the day of the invasion.
What were they talking about? The weather? How about that the Bliar’s generals were questioning the legality of that invasion, a view his Attorney-General Lord Goldsmith seemed to share.
Over the years there have been many accusations leveled at Murdoch, particularly about his ability to influence governments. My favorite being when he put the wood on Clinton to have US taxpayers underwrite a cheap loan so that Ansett, his failing Australian Airline, could be tarted up with a few new Boeings and sold. Which duly happened. Ansett was bought by some assholes who had bribed or cajoled the then NZ govt into selling them Air NZ during the 80’s – early 90’s NZ privatisation carpet bagger sandbagging. Those particular assholes weren’t used to the shoe being on the other foot and got cleaned out. Unfortunately Ansett and Air NZ went broke with much loss of jobs, missing superannuation etc. Air NZ was re-acquired by the NZ taxpayers for sweet FA and of course now the neo-liberal pricks are once again at work levering the asset outta the paws of the taxpayer for the smell of an oily rag, – now it has recovered and is trading successfully.
Anyway despite voluminous accusations there is never much in the way of proof of Murdoch’s abuse of his position. What there was has generally come from drunken washed up and bitter former newspaper editors. This report is the exception, although, since no record has been kept of what was sai,d we can expect to be told they were discussing the Ashes or some such.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jul 20 2007 1:58 utc | 24

Oops it seems that B had already pointed to the article about Murdoch and Bliar’s chats. Sorry bout that. It seems that being a part time MoA contributor is difficult verging on impossible.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jul 20 2007 2:34 utc | 25

Leader of Al Qaeda group in Iraq was fictional, U.S. military says

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 20 2007 3:14 utc | 26

In case you missed it…
FISA court judge John D. Bates Dismisses Plame Civil Suit Against White House
This (criminal) Bush administration has been loading the judiciary with political hacks for seven years!

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 20 2007 6:23 utc | 27

From the comment section @C&L:

Did a little checking on Judge John D. Bates….First, he was Ken Starr’s right hand
atty. prosecuting(persucuiting) Bill and Hillary during the Whitewater fiasco(NOT guility).
He is the judge who passed down the ruling that Dick Cheney did not have to release the
identities of the individuals who attended the secret, behind closed door meetings of the
Energy Task Force, and he as, in 2006, appointed by S/C Justice Roberts to be his
special judge in matters relating to foreign relations survillance. Now tell me, was he
“hand-picked” to rule on the Plame/Wilson case or what???

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 20 2007 6:28 utc | 28

Broader Privilege Claimed In Firings
White House Says Hill Can’t Pursue Contempt Cases
By Dan Eggen and Amy Goldstein
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, July 20, 2007; Page A01
Bush administration officials unveiled a bold new assertion of executive authority yesterday in the dispute over the firing of nine U.S. attorneys, saying that the Justice Department will never be allowed to pursue contempt charges initiated by Congress against White House officials once the president has invoked executive privilege.
snip
just a little added fuel …

Posted by: Siun | Jul 20 2007 6:37 utc | 29

@ breal #16:
It’s nice to see that businessmen can now buy their statesmen directly, rather than having to rent them anew every election. It’s kind of like a sports team now — perhaps they’ll all wear “Roadie” jackets that say Virgin Atlantic on their backs. In any event, this is sort of like and all-star team. Who would they compete against? Bliar might not even make the cut for AAA.

Posted by: Malooga | Jul 20 2007 7:46 utc | 30

Debs is Dead: “Anyway despite voluminous accusations there is never much in the way of proof of Murdoch’s abuse of his position. What there was has generally come from drunken washed up and bitter former newspaper editors.”
WTF?

Posted by: Rick | Jul 20 2007 11:44 utc | 31

@Malooga Yeah it’s a damned shame that ever since Leonid’s demise there hasn’t been a cohesive team of burly vodka swilling old players whoopin it up on the diamond with chants like “You think you can beat all our generals? just wait till you meet General Winter.”
Still Fidel has pretty much pulled the pin on his day job. I betcha he he could put together a decent team. Every time Jimmy hooks his catheter tube around Nelson’s walking frame to drag him off to Darfur to highlight the oppression of African people since China began developing the Somalian oilfields, Fidel could swing his drip around his head like a bola to lasoo Nelson and drag him off to the Nigerian delta zone. The attendant papparazzi could snap towns drowned in water stained with rainbow slicks while Nigerian army death squads waste the local Ogoni people for having the gall to ask for help with the inconvenience of having nothing wet than can be drunk, no fields still able to grow crops that don’t catch fire or reek of petroleum.
Roman Abramovich could deck Fidel’s team out in Chelsea shirts.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jul 20 2007 12:06 utc | 32

Cloned Poster #19

So there I was, minding my own business
For those who have not heard “The Story” yet, here it is. Unfortunately, as more foreign fighters enter the city, more (very) well-trained snipers are out and about with devastating effect.
For the past two weeks we had been conducting an operation called “Together Forward.” The basic goal was to seal off and rapidly clean up some of the worst hotspots in Baghdad. The 172nd Stryker Brigade would cordon off (seal off) an entire district of Baghdad for two weeks or so and search house by house and building by building to clean out weapons and bad guys.

Funny that MSNBC would lead with that headline? Times are a changing …

Posted by: Rick | Jul 20 2007 12:28 utc | 33

US ambassador to the UN Khalilzad in an NYT op-ed to U.N.: “We have a problem. Please help us to steal Iraqs oil!”

A new United Nations envoy should have a mandate to help Iraqis complete work on a range of issues: the law governing distribution of hydrocarbon revenues, the reform of the de-Baathification law, the review of the Constitution, the plan for demobilization of militias, an agreement for insurgents to give up their armed struggle.

Nothing suprising there. It is certainly not by chance that robbing oil comes first …
But there is one interesting point Khalilzad makes. The first time, I believe, this is officially made by this administration:

Several of Iraq’s neighbors — not only Syria and Iran but also some friends of the United States — are pursuing destabilizing policies

Posted by: b | Jul 20 2007 12:46 utc | 34

Three British soldiers were killed during an attack with mortars on a British base in Basra, southern Iraq, on Thursday.

In the base! Wonder if it was a lucky shot or better methodology…

Posted by: Alamet | Jul 20 2007 15:12 utc | 35

The surge must be working. You can almost touch the optimism in the air.
US Coalition Mulls Fate of Iraqi Helpers

Posted by: Alamet | Jul 20 2007 16:59 utc | 36

Iraq Slogger:

“Secret Prison” Uncovered in Kadhimiya
Slogger Source: Illicit Facility Holds over 400 Sunnis, Militia Role Suspected

I can’t tell from the above article if the prison is still in operation or not…

MP: “S.O.S.” for Vulnerable Falluja Civilians
City “Looks Like Guantanamo” after Two Months of Siege

Posted by: Alamet | Jul 20 2007 17:05 utc | 37

Something different:
Iran’s clerical spymasters
About Iran’s intelligence structure, counterintelligence operations, etc. Really interesting.

Posted by: Alamet | Jul 20 2007 17:08 utc | 38

Cheney to become president
(briefly)
…or bush colonoscopy.

Posted by: beq | Jul 20 2007 17:09 utc | 39

GI goon convicted of murdering an Iraqi gets slap on wrist. I mean, it’s just an wog ya know? Nothing meriting any jail time.

Posted by: ran | Jul 20 2007 17:42 utc | 40

Is Associate Press launching a campaign against Obama?
This was an event with some 500 people in some place called Sunapee, NH.
If he said what is “reported” here he is certainly laudable correct, but the report does not include the question asked, nor the context of the answer: Obama: Don’t Stay in Iraq Over Genocide

SUNAPEE, N.H. –
Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn’t a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.
“Well, look, if that’s the criteria by which we are making decisions on the deployment of U.S. forces, then by that argument you would have 300,000 troops in the Congo right now – where millions have been slaughtered as a consequence of ethnic strife – which we haven’t done,” Obama said in an interview with The Associated Press.
“We would be deploying unilaterally and occupying the Sudan, which we haven’t done. Those of us who care about Darfur don’t think it would be a good idea,” he said. …

A local account is quite different.
Aside from this, I do not like Obama, his positions he voiced elsewhere are not agreeable to me and I wouldn’t vote for him. Just want to point out the AP “twang” in this that causes many right wing blogs (which I don’t link to) use and H. Clinton will use, to bash him.

Posted by: b | Jul 20 2007 19:35 utc | 41

but… what about all that intensive humanitarian training that the infantry undergoes in boot camp/basic training?

Posted by: b real | Jul 20 2007 20:07 utc | 42

a brief extract from gwb’s blather in nashville on thursday, after he was asked (by a save-dafurian) what the u.s. was going to do about darfur.

Thank you very much. For starters, the fact that Americans care about people in faraway lands is a great testimony to our compassion. I believe — good foreign — you’ve heard about one aspect of our foreign policy — two aspects, really, when you think about it. One is the combination of military and diplomatic assets trying to achieve objectives in Iraq and Afghanistan and elsewhere. Another is the working coalitions. And by the way, there are a lot of other countries in Afghanistan and Iraq. They don’t get nearly the credit they deserve, but a lot of other people besides us understand that this is the beginning of a long ideological struggle, and now is the time to make the hard decisions so little guys in the future don’t have to deal with the consequences of that.
The other aspect of foreign policy is I believe to whom much is given, much is required. And people say, well, we got plenty of problems in America; why do you worry about something going on overseas? First of all, we’re wealthy. We’re spending enormous sums of money. If we set proper priorities, we can not only help our own citizens, but I believe it helps our soul and our conscience, and I believe we have a moral obligation to help others.

She asked about Darfur. First we — as this administration has proven, it’s possible to achieve some success in Sudan with the north-south agreement that we were able to achieve with Ambassador Danforth at the time. We are now working to make sure that holds by insisting that the revenue-sharing agreement of the oil on Sudan is effective.

to whom much is given, even more is taken

Posted by: b real | Jul 21 2007 3:47 utc | 43

b real, #43,
Just amazing. And from another perspective, when Bush says, “First of all, we’re wealthy.” Who the hell are “we”? Isn’t the U.S. the world’s #1 debtor nation? Most people I know are in debt up to their eyeballs even with the still relatively cheap price of gas here in the U.S. But I guess we can live high on the hog for awhile yet as long as Big Oil can keep the squeeze on the third world and the big banks let Americans go deeper in hock … CitiCorp posting astonishing profits today (approx. up 20%), so I guess Americans are being squeezed in their own special way. How many years can all this continue?

Posted by: Rick | Jul 21 2007 4:51 utc | 44

Transcript fuels row over doctor held in Australia on terror charge

A transcript of the interrogation of a doctor charged in Australia in connection with the London and Glasgow terror attacks reveals inconsistencies in police statements about the case.
Publication of the 142-page transcript has fuelled growing concerns over the apparent lack of evidence against Mohammed Haneef, a 27-year-old Indian doctor who was arrested in Australia as he was about to board a flight to Bangalore on Monday July 2, two days after the failed car bomb attacks in London and Scotland.

The police simply lied, the guy is likely innocent.

Posted by: b | Jul 21 2007 7:24 utc | 45

Bush alters rules for CIA interrogations

The five-page order reiterated many protections already granted under U.S. and international law. It said that any conditions of confinement and interrogation cannot include:
Torture or other acts of violence serious enough to be considered comparable to murder, torture, mutilation or cruel or inhuman treatment.
• Willful or outrageous acts of personal abuse done to humiliate or degrade someone in a way so serious that any reasonable person would “deem the acts to be beyond the bounds of human decency.” That includes sexually indecent acts.
• Acts intended to denigrate the religion of an individual.
The order does not permit detainees to contact family members or have access to the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Doesn’t make any sense, but that is likely what it’s supposed to do.

Posted by: b | Jul 21 2007 13:44 utc | 46

Over on the Oil Drum (Jerome is a frequent poster) J. Brown (google Oil Drum, ELM, or on their site Export Land Model, or see a quick link graphoilogy and a simple graphic here) has pointed out that oil exporting countries are steadily consuming more; combined with depletion of their own resources, the dotted line, as a projection of the future based on current data, shows a run down to zero in 9 years.
In 9 years, or X years, exporters will no longer be exporters, and countries with no oil res. will get none, following that kind of projection/analysis.
Of course it will not play out that way. The US has since 50 years invested in a huge military to defend ‘the American way of life’ – meaning being top of the chain and controlling resources all over the world.
M. Klare, posted at Tom Paine com, makes these points, quote:
• The transformation of the U.S. military into a global oil protection service whose primary mission is to defend America’s overseas sources of oil and natural gas, while patrolling the world’s major pipelines and supply routes.
• The transformation of Russia into an energy superpower with control over Eurasia’s largest supplies of oil and natural gas and the resolve to convert these assets into ever increasing political influence over neighboring states.
• A ruthless scramble among the great powers for the remaining oil, natural gas, and uranium reserves of Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia, accompanied by recurring military interventions, the constant installation and replacement of client regimes, systemic corruption and repression, and the continued impoverishment of the great majority of those who have the misfortune to inhabit such energy-rich regions.
• Increased state intrusion into, and surveillance of, public and private life as reliance on nuclear power grows, bringing with it an increased threat of sabotage, accident, and the diversion of fissionable materials into the hands of illicit nuclear proliferators.
unquote.
link

Posted by: Noirette | Jul 21 2007 14:51 utc | 47

reposted last link:
link: Is Energo-fascism your future?

Posted by: Noirette | Jul 21 2007 14:57 utc | 48

Thanks Noirette – good one.

Q. Why is the media eager to find out who’s is inside Bush’s ass.
A. They’ve forgotten where they are.

Posted by: b | Jul 21 2007 18:36 utc | 49

Some real views from soldiers on a 15-month deployment in the heart of the surge. Reporter is from the Guardian but it apparently showed on ABC news. The video is definitely worth watching, both the 4 minute clip of the soldiers challenging Bush or the senate to come see what it is like, and also two comments from mothers of the soldiers.
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Story?id=3383389&page=2

Posted by: brewster_north | Jul 22 2007 1:45 utc | 50

@B your post on Haneef is but the tip of the ice berg. Living with his cousins is a bit of a play with the reality which was that they all at some time stayed at a hostel for newly arrived professionals from the sub-continent. There were times when Haneef was there that one or other of his cousins(the two brothers one a doctor the other an engineer) were also there. This was in sperate rooms, more like a hotel than an apartment.
But if you want get truly angry about this read the piece in today’s Sydney Morning Herald Plan to deport liability Haneef. The article argues that the Federal Government needs to deport Haneef now because he is plainly innocent and will be an embarrassment for the Howard Government in the upcoming election if he remains of Australian soil.
Nothing about due process or his rights as a human innocent of any crime not to be penalised for something he didn’t do.
Although R’Giap remembers I doubt that other MoA habitues can comprehend the awfulness of the mainstream media in a society regarded as a vital cog in the Empire. This is very different to that which is ‘tolerated’ in the media manufactured for citizens of the Empire where a pretense of dissent is tolerated. No such chances can be taken with Australia, repository of vast amounts uranium, aluminium, hydrocarbons, and literally hundreds of veins of obscure but much sought after minerals.
I think I have pointed out that the current attacks upon the independence of Aboriginal communities which until now have had the power to determine who may come onto their land, has been attributed to a desire to ‘protect’ Aboriginal children when in fact it is about protecting the resources on their land from others, particularly Chinese buyers.
The Australian media, in concert with the so-called opposition didn’t question this in the least. It took a Maori politician in NZ, who was later subjected to vicious attack from both sides of the Tasman to get any media attention on these injustices and the consequent risk to Aboriginal people.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jul 22 2007 3:43 utc | 51

latest article by the nyt’s jeffrey gettleman on ethiopia’s brutal crackdown on the ogaden region.
Ethiopia is said to block food to rebel region

NAIROBI, Kenya: The Ethiopian government is blockading emergency food aid and choking off trade to large swaths of a remote region in the eastern part of the country that is home to a rebel force, putting hundreds of thousands of people at risk of starvation, Western diplomats and humanitarian officials say.
The Ethiopian military and its proxy militias have also been siphoning off millions of dollars in international food aid, and using a United Nations polio eradication program to funnel money to their fighters, according to relief officials, former Ethiopian government administrators and a member of the Ethiopian Parliament who defected to Germany last month to protest the government’s actions.
The blockade takes aim at the heart of the Ogaden region, a vast desert on the Somali border where the government is struggling against a growing rebellion and where government soldiers have been accused by human rights groups of widespread brutality.
Humanitarian officials say the ban on aid convoys and commercial traffic, intended to squeeze the rebels and dry up their bases of support, has sent food prices skyrocketing and disrupted trade routes, preventing the nomads who live there from selling their livestock. Hundreds of thousands of people are now sealed off in a desiccated, unforgiving landscape that is difficult to survive in even in the best of times.

..Western diplomats have been urging Ethiopian officials to lift the blockade, arguing that the many people in the area are running out of time. “It’s a starve-out-the-population strategy,” said one Western humanitarian official, who did not want to be quoted by name because he feared reprisals against aid workers.

Ethiopia is a close American ally and a key partner in America’s counterterrorism efforts in the Horn of Africa, a region that has become a breeding ground for Islamic militants, many of whom have threatened to wage a holy war against Ethiopia.

the article leaves out crucial context in this paragraph, as the militants in the horn, somalia specificially, are reacting to the illegal invasion & occupation of somalia by ethiopian forces that destroyed the growing islamic unity governance late december (the population of somalia is about 99% muslim). by leaving out this context, the article furthers the western stereotype of irrational bad muslims. and the use of the phrase “breeding ground” just sounds racist. mosquitoes and ungulates have breeding grounds, not people.

[Ethiopia] receives nearly half a billion dollars in American aid each year, but this week, a House subcommittee passed a bill that would put strict conditions on some of that aid and ban Ethiopian officials linked to rights abuses from entering the United States. The House also recently passed an amendment, sponsored by J. Randy Forbes, a Virginia Republican, that stripped Ethiopia of $3 million in assistance to “send a strong message that if they don’t wake up and pay attention, more money will be cut,” Forbes said.
Ethiopia’s pardon on Friday of 30 political prisoners who had been sentenced to life in prison could ease some criticism. But Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, is pushing ahead with measures to more closely vet assistance to the Ethiopian military. According to human rights groups and firsthand accounts, government troops have gang raped women, burned down huts and killed civilians.

Villagers say that anyone who criticizes the government risks getting killed. According to Ogaden Online, a Canadian-based news service that has been highly critical of the Ethiopian government and covers the region through a network of reporters and contributors, some equipped with satellite phones, four young men who were videotaped by The New York Times at a community meeting in an Ogaden village in May were later tortured and executed.
The claim could not be fully verified independently, but their identities may have been discovered by Ethiopian soldiers who had arrested three journalists for The Times in the Ogaden and confiscated their notebooks, cameras and computers.

As the food crisis looms, Western diplomats are also concerned about a separate plan by the regional government in the Ogaden to divert a share of its own budget for development projects — like schools and farming — to the Ethiopian military.
This seems to be part of the Ethiopian government’s strategy to do whatever it takes to crush the rebels, who have deep popular support and, according to the government, are getting arms and training from neighboring Eritrea, Ethiopia’s bitter enemy.
The people of the Ogaden are mostly Somalis and ethnically distinct from the highland Ethiopians who have ruled the country for centuries, and the long battle over the region has been steadily escalating this year. The country director of one Western aid agency, who recently returned from a field visit there, said he saw two villages that had been burned to the ground and several schools that had been converted into military bases, with foxholes.
Humanitarian officials say the military is building up militias and setting the stage for clan-based bloodshed. The rank and file of the Ogaden National Liberation Front tend to be members of the Ogaden clan, and so the government has turned to other clans to form anti-rebel militias. In the past few weeks, thousands of men have been armed.

Posted by: b real | Jul 22 2007 4:28 utc | 52

Here below are lucid excerpts from a U.S. believer in ‘Conspiracy Theory’ as applied to the Middle East and Israel. I could have written the last 2 paragraphs myself. Reese also mentions the “propaganda based on a misquotation” which I have constantly emphasized in my various comments:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reese/reese377.html
Idiots on the March
by Charley Reese
Idiots in Israel, along with those American idiots in the punditocracy who can’t see where they are going because their vision is blocked by Israeli backsides, are trying to pressure our idiots in the White House to commit an act of insanity.
That act of insanity is launching a military attack against Iran because the idiots and their followers believe, despite a total lack of evidence, that Iran is pursuing a nuclear bomb. If you think the Middle East is in turmoil now, just watch what happens if idiocy prevails.
Israel, Pakistan and India all have nuclear weapons, all refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and all are warmly held allies of the idiots in Washington.
Furthermore, having five or six nuclear weapons does not make you a threat against a country with 200 nukes (Israel), much less the U.S., which has more than 3,000 nukes.
So let these facts settle into your head. Iran says it seeks to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, as it is legally entitled to do under the terms of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. There is no evidence to contradict that. Iran has said repeatedly that it has no desire to acquire a nuclear weapon. It has never – despite the propaganda based on a misquotation – ever threatened Israel or the United States, or, for that matter, anyone else.
So what’s afoot? I’ll tell you what I think. The neocons in the U.S. and their pet bully, Israel, intend to dominate the Middle East and its oil. That means any country not run by a servile suck-up (Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, etc.) must be weakened or destroyed.
We’ve pretty much destroyed Iraq and Lebanon, so that leaves Syria and Iran. I imagine the neocons plan on Israel taking out Syria while the U.S. carpet-bombs Iran. The neocons are not only idiots, they are evil. They show a complete disdain for peace, a callous disregard for human life and utter contempt for the rule of law. If that ain’t evil, the devil had better retire.
July 20, 2007

Posted by: Parviz | Jul 22 2007 11:11 utc | 53

Just thought I might point out some more hilarious crossed lines between the Neocon propaganda machinery and its regional serfs, as in the following Reuters report:
U.S. says Iran knows its weapons reaching Taliban
By Jon HemmingTue Jul 17, 12:13 PM ET
Iranian arms are entering Afghanistan and reaching Taliban insurgents in such quality and quantity that the Tehran government must know about it, the U.S. ambassador to Kabul said on Tuesday.
The charge is similar to that made by U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates a month ago, rejected by Tehran as “baseless and illogical.”
But it comes as Iran signaled on Tuesday there was a “high possibility” it would hold a second round of talks with the United States on Iraqi security in the “near future.”
“There are clearly some munitions coming out of Iran going into the hands of the Taliban,” said Ambassador William Wood.
“We believe that the quantity and quality of those munitions are such that the Iranian government must know about it,” he told reporters. “Beyond that we really can’t go.”
The United States accuses Iran of stoking instability in the Middle East by arming insurgents in Iraq, aiding militants in Lebanon and Gaza and trying to build a nuclear arsenal.
Iran denies the charges and says the U.S. military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, and Washington’s support for Israel is the source of instability in the Middle East.
U.S. officials said for several months this year they had evidence of Iranian weapons entering Afghanistan, but until Gates spoke a month ago, stopped short of linking the arms to the Iranian government.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai has said relations with Iran have never been better and said his government does not have any evidence of Iranian arms reaching the Taliban.
Iran was at odds with the Taliban government for most of the time it held sway in neighboring Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001 and massed troops on the Afghan border on 1998 after 11 of its diplomats were killed there.
It then armed Northern Alliance factions that helped U.S.-led forces overthrow the Taliban after the September 11, 2001 attacks.
So why would Iran be helping its deadly enemy, the Taleban??? Only because the Neocons say so.

Posted by: Parviz | Jul 22 2007 11:17 utc | 54

Second hit in just three days.

A British soldier was killed in an attack on a British base in the former presidential palaces in central Basra, the Multi-National Force (MNF) in southern Iraq said on Sunday.

(Link for previous incident @ nr. 35 above.)

Posted by: Alamet | Jul 22 2007 15:43 utc | 55

Then there is this from After Downing Street, but I don’t speak militarese and can’t tell if it is plausible cause for alarm or not:
Navy training to raid Iran

Posted by: Alamet | Jul 22 2007 15:47 utc | 56

The navy training story is no more worrying than the forthcoming location of 4 U.S. carriers in the Persian Gulf. I hope it’s ‘intimidation’ at the very worst. God help the Brits, the Americans and the Iranians if a spark lights the tinderbox.

Posted by: Parviz | Jul 22 2007 16:03 utc | 57

i’m afraid this is not theatre but we are witnessing the imbeciles walking into war

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jul 22 2007 16:08 utc | 58

If that’s the case, then there’s worse to come, because there’s no way Russia will stay out of it, and you could well see a Turkish invasion of northern Iraq. Iran will also strike hard, and they’re 100 times more organized, effective and lethal militarily than the Iraqis who had been constrained by No-Fly Zones, a U.N. embargo and lack of funds prior to the U.S. invasion. The Taliban and Al Qaeda have been praying for this day. Hizbullah and Hamas will bombard Israel with rockets. The Chinese will also increase the pressure on Taiwan and Hong Kong, and will probably shed their excess Dollars to teach the U.S. a lesson.
If the Brits/Americans do something stupid all bets are off, and I mean globally, not just in the regional theatre. Armageddon awaits.

Posted by: Parviz | Jul 22 2007 16:17 utc | 59

@Alamaet – 56 – dubious – and I do know the militarese.
No links, no sources in that piece and several points any decent military planer would not do.
If the 13th MEU is now in Anbar, one certainly would not pick them, but rested troops to raid Iran.
How are they supposed to get SERE training when they are no on board of the ships where the training is given?
Quite some bullshit.
@Parviz – I don’t see 4 carriers in the persian Gulf – not enough room for four anyway – those would be south of Iran somewhere not west.
As for your comfort on Iranian troops against U.S. troops. On the ground – yes. On air and sea power – the U.S. is certainly much better eqipped and trained. That is decicive as long as the U.S. does not want to make big gains on territory.
That said, it would be totally stupid to attack Iran but the U.S. has behaved stupid lots of times …

Posted by: b | Jul 22 2007 18:22 utc | 60

The fact that the birth of the classical, medieval and capitalist civilizations occurred in peripheral regions suggests that when a social system becomes obsolete and is superseded, the leadership in the transition process is likely to be provided not by the affluent, traditional and sclerotic societies in the center, but by the primitive, poverty-stricken and adaptable societies in the peripheries. The implications of this pattern are obvious for the twentieth-century world: contrary to Marx’s expectation, the revolutionary upheavals are occurring in the peripheries, while center remains capitalist.
— l.s. stavrianos, global rift: the third world comes of age, 1981

int’l socialist review: Where is Venezuela going? Chávez and the meaning of twenty-first century socialism

Where is Venezuela going? This article seeks to provide a framework for answering that question. It will (1) analyze the rise of Chávez within the context of Venezuelan history and politics; (2) examine the government’s economic, social, and political policies; (3) evaluate the Venezuelan revolutionary process from the standpoint of classical Marxist theory; and (4) outline a strategic approach towards the Chávez phenomenon for those committed to anti-imperialist and revolutionary socialist politics.

Bolivia: New Economic Model in Progress

La Paz, Jul 22 (Prensa Latina) Bolivian president Evo Morales arrives this Sunday to the first 18 months in power with a new economic model in progress, based on the recovery of natural resources and industrialization as the next stage.
“We have a new economic model, a new economic system that means the beginning of a process of industrialization of the country, it is a democratic way of changing Bolivia after recovering its natural resources,” asserted the dignitary.

Industrialization is the next priority. “We need partners, the economic situation is changing,” he congratulated himself assuring that “macro economic stability is now having its repercussion in the micro economy.”
In addition, Morales explained there are other achievements like the agrarian revolution, the social programs and the establishment of the Constituent Assembly that will write a new Constitution to refound the country, as a sample of a real democracy.

“The most important thing is that we have fulfilled what political science means to us: serve the people,” added the Bolivian president.

Ecuador’s Correa: US no longer “Satan” for Latin America

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa believes that Latin America still faces the challenge of building “true democracy,” but he admitted that the United States is no longer the region’s “Satan.”
“What we have are formal democracies, fragile like plasticine,” Correa, 44, said in an interview with Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa. “It is true that we have been holding elections for 20 years, but having a democracy is something quite different.”

Correa sees himself and other leaders in the region as representatives of the “new, Latin American-style socialism.”
“We are part of that current denominated 21st-century socialism,” he said. “We agree with traditional socialism on the supremacy of labour over capital, for example.”
Correa lamented that over the last two decades, Latin America has suffered “a total subjugation of lives, people and human labour to the need to accumulate capital.”
He complained about changes that made labour markets more flexible for the sake of growth, while workers suffered lower wages and a loss of stability.
In opposition to such changes, Correa emphasized socialist traditions such as “the importance of collective action” to overcome what he called “the myth – closer to religion than to science – that individualism is the engine of society.”

Peru’s poor lose faith in market-friendly president

LIMA (Reuters) – Peruvian President Alan Garcia has won over skeptical business leaders and investors during his first year in office, but angry street protests show he has failed to meet the demands of the poor.
Teachers, peasant farmers and trade unionists have all taken to the streets of the South American country in recent weeks in sometimes violent protests to press demands ranging from more roads, better education and cheaper fertilizers.
“He’s not governing for poor people, he’s governing for the rich. We want him to implement the responsible change he’s promised, and if he can’t do it, he should go,” teacher Elma Suarez, 35, said during a protest in the capital, Lima.
A center-leftist, Garcia began his second term as president last July by vowing to grow the economy and fight poverty.
But his approval rating has slumped from 63 percent in August to 42 percent in June, a poll by Ipsos Apoyo showed.

Nicaragua Sandinistas Recall Revolution: Nicaragua Sandinistas, Back In Power, Celebrate 28th Anniversary Of Revolution

Nicaragua’s Sandinistas marked the 28th anniversary of their 1979 revolution on Thursday and this year’s celebrations were particularly sweet _ the leftist party is back in power and surrounded by allies.
President Daniel Ortega, elected for a second term in November, was joined by the presidents of Panama and Honduras, as well as Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, who has supplied Nicaragua with oil and other fuels.
“Unity will make us free,” Chavez said. “The empire has always maintained its plans to keep us divided, and thus weak and dominated,” he added, referring to the United States.
Ortega called the anniversary “a glorious date,” saying many still “fight for liberty, justice, sovereignty and against imperial domination.”
The celebration was to include the formal rollout of Ortega’s controversial “people’s councils,” described by the Sandinistas as an exercise in direct democracy.

Posted by: b real | Jul 23 2007 4:01 utc | 61

Thanks b real – astonishing –
now add Turkey where the socialdemocratic, pro-Europe (and mildly religious) AKP did win the election. Ruling Party in Turkey Wins Broad Victory

The Islamic-inspired governing party of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan won a larger-than-expected victory in nationwide parliamentary elections on Sunday, taking close to half the total vote in a stinging rebuke to Turkey’s old guard.
With nearly all the votes counted, the Justice and Development Party led by Mr. Erdogan won 46.6 percent of the vote, according to Turkish election officials, far more than the 34 percent the party garnered in the last election, in 2002.
The secular state establishment had expected that voters would punish Mr. Erdogan’s party for promoting an Islamic agenda. But the main secular party, the Republican People’s Party, received just 20.9 percent, compared with 19 percent in the last election. The Nationalist Action Party, which played on fears of ethnic Kurdish separatism, won 14.3 percent, officials said.

The “western” press always rides on the “islamic party” fearmongering. But that is not the major point. This is the first mildly socialist party in Turkey. The Republican People’s Party is comparable to the Republicans in the U.S. and the Nationalists are radical rightwings.
The left just did win another one.

Posted by: b | Jul 23 2007 5:10 utc | 62

Two Americas, one Maxed Out.

Maxed Out takes viewers on a journey deep inside the American style of debt, where things seem fine as long as the minimum monthly payment … arrives on time.
With coverage that spans from small American towns all the way to the White House, the film shows how the modern financial industry really works, explains the true definition of “preferred customer” and tells us why the poor are getting poorer while the rich keep getting richer.
Hilarious, shocking and incisive, Maxed Out paints a picture of a national nightmare which is all too real for most of us.”

The title should have been, “Thief’s, Vampires, Wolves and Vultures.’
Well worth the time if you have it…
I found the most insightful bit at the very end, while the credits were rolling, when the pawnbroker said the following:
“I was somewhere about a year ago. It was definitely a blue-collar environment – machinists of some sort. And they go,’we don’t want to pay extra money and have more taxes for people who can’t afford their health insurance and just don’t make enough money.’
And I’m going, ‘that’s you guys; that’s you!’ And they don’t get it, they just don’t get it.”
This really encapsulates the dilemma at the heart of American politics today: after years of being demonized by Republicans, people are absolutely loathe to fund social safety nets, because they think of them as programs that are used by “somebody else.” But then, when those same people do need those safety nets, they are not available, so they often have to rely upon private debt.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 23 2007 5:35 utc | 63

Rick, #44 wrote:
CitiCorp posting astonishing profits today (approx. up 20%), so I guess Americans are being squeezed in their own special way. How many years can all this continue?
Perhaps only another month, or week, or day(s?). Check out Mike Whitney’s The Crisis in Hedgistan
Two columns of black smoke can still be seen rising over the New York skyline.
Terrorism?
Not quite. The plumes of smoke are all that’s left of two major hedge funds which blew up just weeks ago leaving nothing behind but a few smoldering embers and a mound of black soot.
The compiled assets of the Bear Sterns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Fund–nearly $20 billion–have vanished into the miasma of cyber-space soon be joined by $1.4 trillion of other, equally worthless, Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO).
If you look closely, you’ll see the mangled bodies of the CDOs, the CDSs (Credit Default Swaps), the RMBS (Residential Mortgage Backed Securities) and the other shaky debt-instruments being pulled from the wreckage and tossed on the bonfire.
Is this how it all ends? Will the sudden spike in subprime defaults send all the funds in “Hedgistan” crashing to earth?
No one knows–yet.
According to Bloomberg News, Bear Sterns announced last week that there’s “little value left” in one of its funds and “no value left” in the other.
Nothing, nada, zippo.
The news has left Wall Street in a state of shock.
What does it all mean?
Does that mean that the entire hedge fund Empire”which is built on a foundation of dodgy loans and quicksand—may be headed for the crapper?
We don’t know. But a cloud has settled-in over downtown Manhattan where gloomy-looking men in pinstriped suits are waiting for the other shoe to drop.
The hedge fund industry is based on the bizarre notion that one does not have to produce anything of value to make boatloads of money. You don’t even need assets any more—just a risky subprime loan that can be transformed into an investment grade security (CDO) through the magic of “securitization” a sprinkling of Wall Street snake oil.
Abracadabra—presto-chango!

Posted by: jj | Jul 23 2007 8:34 utc | 64

didn’t anyone wonder about what drove the Masters of the Universe, as they would have it, to Russia to meet w/Putin recently? All the moreso since it seems to have been censored from our propaganda apparatus. How’s this for a delegation-
Kissinger was accompanied on his junket by a delegation of high-powered political and corporate big-wigs including former Secretary of State George Schultz, former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, former Special Representative for Arms Control, Nonproliferation and Disarmament Ambassador Thomas Graham Jr., former Senator Sam Nunn and Chevron Chairman and Chief Executive Officer David O’Reilly.
Kissinger’s Secret Meeting With Putin
Well… I dug up this AMAZING NUGGET today.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President George W. Bush spent most of their time at the “lobster summit” at Kennebunkport, Maine, discussing how to prevent the growing tensions between their two countries from getting out of hand.
 
The media and international affairs experts have been portraying missile defense in Europe and the final status of Kosovo as the two most contentious issues between Russia and the United States, with mutual recriminations over “democracy standards” providing the background for the much anticipated onset of a new Cold War. But while this may well be true for today, the stage has been quietly set for a much more serious confrontation in the non-too-distant future between Russia and the United States – along with Canada, Norway and Denmark.
Russia has recently laid claim to a vast 1,191,000 sq km (460,800 sq miles) chunk of the ice-covered Arctic seabed. The claim is not really about territory, but rather about the huge hydrocarbon reserves that are hidden on the seabed under the Arctic ice cap. These newly discovered energy reserves will play a crucial role in the global energy balance as the existing reserves of oil and gas are depleted over the next 20 years.
Of course, there’s a small matter of international law, but that’s never stopped the West, so…

Posted by: jj | Jul 23 2007 9:03 utc | 65

Oops – here’s the link. Russia and US to Square Off Over Arctic Energy Reserves

Posted by: jj | Jul 23 2007 9:07 utc | 66

@ JJ, Rick, et al…
Bush speaks of a prosperous and even wealth ownership society where people who can pay walk away from their debts, because they’re dead beats?
Meanwhile, Child Poverty In Chicago — photographs by Stephen Shames, (c) 1985. Included is Lafeyette(sic) of “There Are No Children Here.”
A few choice quotes from the above links…

Dr. Katherine Christoffel of The Children’s Memorial Hospital told me her hospital has documented sixteen cases of marasmus and kwasiorkor, which are starvation-related diseases, in the past four years. Generally these Third World diseases are not looked for. “If we kept good records, we would probably be shocked,” she said.

From the recently released Philadelphia Dept. of Human Services planning and budget paper for 2008-09:

Between 2003 and 2005, the percentage of the poverty population who were children, increased from 32.7% to 37.7%. Perhaps more significant, the percentage of all children in Philadelphia who live at or below the poverty level rose from 27.9% to 35%.

When someone is “below the poverty level” they are very, very poor. The federal poverty guidelines are absurd.
I love America’s sense of social responsibility and fair play. It’s such an inspiring example to the rest of the world.
I –and many others–finally figured out that the ‘trickle down’ from the ray gun 80’s, was the elite pissing on the poor caste.
What the fuck difference does it make to us, if some suits lose their portfolios?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 23 2007 9:14 utc | 67

Uncle, I have no problem w/Wall Streeters jumping out of windows again. But I know I won’t survive the incineration of our currency by them.

Posted by: jj | Jul 23 2007 9:24 utc | 68

Here’s an interesting discussion of coming collapse from someone who went through the Russian Nightmare. Closing the ‘Collapse Gap’: the USSR was better prepared for peak oil than the US

Posted by: jj | Jul 23 2007 9:40 utc | 69

Remember the UK sailors Iran snatched out of its waters?
British map in Iran crisis ‘inaccurate’

A BRITISH map of the northern Gulf where Iran seized 15 naval personnel in March was not as accurate as it should have been and Britain was fortunate Iran did not contest it, a review into the crisis said.

A British Ministry of Defence map published during the crisis showed a territorial water boundary extending from the Shatt al-Arab waterway that separates Iran and Iraq out to sea.
However experts say no maritime boundary between the two countries has been agreed and the line was based on a 1975 land boundary that could have shifted over time if the centre of the waterway had moved due to natural causes.
“We conclude that there is evidence to suggest that the map of the Shatt al-Arab waterway provided by the Government was less clear than it ought to have been,” the report said.
“The Government was fortunate that it was not in Iran’s interests to contest the accuracy of the map.”

The report did not make a definitive conclusion on the accuracy of the map or whether the sailors were in Iraqi or Iranian waters.
It quoted Martin Pratt, director of research at the International Boundaries Research Unit at Durham University, as saying that if the British coordinates were correct, it was difficult to see how Iran’s claim could be legitimate.
“Nevertheless, there are sufficient uncertainties over boundary definition in the area to make it inadvisable to state categorically that the vessel was in Iraqi waters,” he was quoted as saying.
He said the map was “certainly an oversimplification” and could be regarded as “deliberately misleading”.

Posted by: b | Jul 23 2007 10:31 utc | 70

kwasiorkor in Chicago ?
I recall mentions of kwasiorkor in Biafra. And that was 40 years ago — and in the thick of a brutal all-out civil war
someone please say it aint so

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Jul 23 2007 10:50 utc | 71

avnery – the lies of bush

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jul 23 2007 17:15 utc | 72

R’giaps -link – Bush’s Latest, Ludicrous, Doomed Plan for Israel and Palestine

In this western–or, rather, middle eastern–there are also Good Guys and Bad Guys. The good ones are the “moderates”, who are the allies of the US in the Middle East–Israel, Mahmoud Abbas and the pro-American Arab regimes. The bad ones are Hamas, Hizbullah, Iran, Syria and al-Qaeda.
It is a simple script. So simple, indeed, that an 8-year-old can understand it. The conclusions are also simple: the good guys have to be supported, the bad guys have to bite the dust. At the end, the hero–George himself–will ride off into the sunset on his noble steed, while the music reaches a crescendo.
The classic western, of course, does not show us the heroic pioneers stealing the land from the Indians. Or the United States cavalry attacking the camps of the Indians, burning down the tents and killing their inhabitants, men, women and children. Or how the US government, after signing formal treaties with the Indian nations, breaks them one after another. Or how it drives the remnants into desolate regions, long before the term “ethnic cleansing” was first used.

– recommended –

Posted by: b | Jul 23 2007 17:33 utc | 73

Welcome to Richistan, USA
The American Dream of riches for all is turning into a nightmare of inequality. But a backlash is brewing.

America’s super-rich have returned to the days of the Roaring Twenties. As the rest of the country struggles to get by, a huge bubble of multi-millionaires lives almost in a parallel world. The rich now live in their own world of private education, private health care and gated mansions. They have their own schools and their own banks. They even travel apart – creating a booming industry of private jets and yachts. Their world now has a name, thanks to a new book by Wall Street Journal reporter Robert Frank which has dubbed it ‘Richistan’. There every dream can come true. But for the American Dream itself – which promises everyone can join the elite – the emergence of Richistan is a mixed blessing. ‘We in America are heading towards ‘developing nation’ levels of inequality. We would become like Brazil. What does that say about us? What does that say about America?’ Frank said.

But many think it must change. To a large degree, the debate over the booming lives of the super-rich is an argument about the American soul. It is a country that has always worshiped wealth, where the creation of a fortune was seen as virtuous and a source of pride.
But now that huge wealth has started to squeeze the ‘middle class’ out of existence, leaving the haves and have-nots in very separate worlds. It is possible that political will may develop to address the problem or that the problem will correct itself. The notorious end of the Gilded Age came in the panic of 1893 that sank America into depression.
Frank believes the signs of a coming storm are there. ‘The trick is to spot when prosperity turns to excess,’ he said. ‘When a large amount of people make a lot money very quickly it’s a sign you are near the top of the market.’
In a world of mega-yachts, private submarines and space hotels, that peak might be close at hand. And it’s a long way down.

Well, I see no setback yet …

Posted by: b | Jul 23 2007 17:56 utc | 74

Army Officer Says Gitmo Panels Flawed
Snip…

Abraham’s affidavit “proves what we all suspected, which is that the CSRTs [Combat Status Review Tribunals] were a complete sham,” said a lawyer for al-Odah, David Cynamon.

Snip…

The military held Combatant Status Review Tribunals for 558 detainees at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay in 2004 and 2005, with handcuffed detainees appearing before panels made up of three officers. Detainees had a military “personal representative” instead of a defense attorney, and all but 38 were determined to be “enemy combatants.”
Abraham was asked to serve on one of the panels, and he said its members felt strong pressure to find against the detainee, saying there was “intensive scrutiny” when they declared a prisoner not to be an enemy combatant. When his panel decided the detainee wasn’t an “enemy combatant,” they were ordered to reconvene to hear more evidence, he said.
Ultimately, his panel held its ground, and he was never asked to participate in another tribunal, he said.
Matthew J. MacLean, another al-Odah lawyer, said Abraham is the first member of the CSRT panels who has been identified, let alone been willing to criticize the tribunals in the public record. His affidavit was submitted to a Washington, D.C., appellate court on al-Odah’s behalf as well as to the Supreme Court.
“It wouldn’t be quite right to say this is the most important piece of evidence that has come out of the CSRT process, because this is the only piece of evidence ever to come out of the CSRT process,” MacLean said. “It’s our only view into the CSRT.”
In April, the Supreme Court declined to review whether Guantanamo Bay detainees may go to federal court to challenge their indefinite confinement. Lawyers for the detainees have asked the justices to reconsider. The Bush administration opposes the request.

Thank you, Lt. Col. Stephen E. Abraham. I’m glad there are still men with souls who are in the position to do the right thing. They will, of course, crush you for this, but I will drink a toast to your memory.

Posted by: Monolycus | Jul 23 2007 18:30 utc | 75

@Monolycus – that report is quite effectful as Lt.Col. Abraham is a very staunch conservative. Karl Rove will have big time trouble to smear him.
The NYT had a profile on Abraham yesterday.

A lawyer in civilian life, he had been decorated for counterespionage and counterterrorism work during 22 years as a reserve Army intelligence officer in which he rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel. His posting, just as the Guantánamo hearings were accelerating in 2004, gave him a close-up view of the government’s detention policies.

His road to notoriety, he says, is entirely of a piece with his biography. A political conservative who says he cried when Richard M. Nixon resigned the presidency, he says he has remained a reservist throughout his adult life to repay the country for the opportunities it offered his family. His father is a Holocaust survivor who emigrated after the Second World War.
“It is my duty,” Colonel Abraham said of his decision to come forward.

Not that I ever would like anyone who cried when Nixon resigned, but this time he makes a difference …

Posted by: b | Jul 23 2007 18:48 utc | 76

Abu G: And I am telling you, I’m not going…

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says he’s staying at the Justice Department to try to repair its image problem created by Democrat hacks, telling Congress in a statement released Monday he’s troubled to hear rumors that there is an scandalously libelous perception that politics may have played a part in hiring career federal prosecutors.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 23 2007 19:08 utc | 77

Beq, anyone?
Can someone please educate me on the difference between this and this?
I mean, I can be as thick as a brick as anyone, but please, I want to be smart, I relly, relly do but, I was never to good at Compare and Contrast.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 23 2007 19:56 utc | 78

I wish I could enlighten you Uncle. I don’t go to dkos so much. And this may be why. I thank Bernhard for letting us go at it from time to time. On one hand you have the (and I even heard this Saturday when I went to see Cindy Sheehan very near where this incident took place) lefthand accusations of circular firing squads and how the regressive right can get it done but they are just parrots, screeching a few lines they’ve learned, there is nothing there.
I want to be smart too. So I come here.
🙂

Posted by: beq | Jul 23 2007 21:22 utc | 79

parrot.

Posted by: beq | Jul 23 2007 21:30 utc | 80

@b (#76)
Whatever sins he might have to atone for, I believe that this goes a very long way towards redeeming his humanity. One is never too old to discover that they still have a bit of humanity.
Anyway…
Harriet Miers and Bush Chief of Staff to face contempt charges
Snip…

Former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and Joshua Bolten, the current Chief of Staff to President George W. Bush, will likely be charged with contempt by the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday this week.
“This investigation, including the reluctant but necessary decision to move forward with contempt, has been a very deliberative process, taking care at each step to respect the Executive Branch’s legitimate prerogatives,” said Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, in a statement. “I’ve allowed the White House and Ms. Miers every opportunity to cooperate with this investigation, either voluntarily or under subpoena. It is still my hope that they will reconsider this hard-line position, and cooperate with our investigation so that we can get to the bottom of this matter.”
Through an attorney, Miers had had earlier stated that she does not fear contempt charges. She refused to comply with a subpoena and appear before the House Committee on July 12 as part of the investigation into the firing of 9 US Attorneys. Bolten also has failed to turn over documents sought by House Democrats. The Bush chief of staff was ordered to comply with the subpoena by 10 AM this morning.

Ms Miers’ defiance here is reminiscent of Rove’s inexplicable smugness preceding the 2006 election smackdown. She obviously believes her dark cronies are able to get anything they want for their faithful followers. This is particularly odd since Ms Miers was the party involved on one of the rare occasions when this President wasn’t given a blank cheque… or she’d be on the other side of the bench right now issuing contemptible charges of her own.
There’s a small chance that she isn’t as stupidly fawning as she looks and she really does know something the rest of us don’t. After all, we know there are few depths to which this administration won’t sink. Heh heh.

Posted by: Monolycus | Jul 24 2007 0:10 utc | 81

The way I walk is just the way I walk…lol
Things are bad when this is more sane that what we got today…lmao
The Cramps- Live at Napa State Mental Hospital

The Cramps, punks, Californian mental patients. The concert of a nembutol delirium. The lines blur, everyone dances.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 24 2007 1:16 utc | 82

uncle #63. i am glad i watched that movie last noght after you posted it, it is no longer available at your link…

Posted by: annie | Jul 24 2007 1:17 utc | 83

Sorry about that annie, here is another copy in english, with Spanish subtitles.
Also, There’s a group called Americans for Fairness in Lending that has good information and some action steps on this stuff.
And a GAO report from last fall outlines a lot of the ugly credit card stuff – card issuers changing the terms on your card because you missed a payment on a different card; people owing 5 times their original purchase amounts because of fees; the percentage of cardholders who actually understand the terms of their cards; etc.
My own mother got caught up in this shit, and paid on her card purchase for decades before she died. The credit card company had the gall to try to get my brother to continue paying her bill. He told em to get fucked, post haste.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 24 2007 1:51 utc | 84

Brother Ali – Uncle Sam $cam Goddamn

[Intro]
Ah, the name of this song is Uncle Sam goddamn
It’s a show tune but the show ain’t been written for it yet
We’re gonna see if Tony Jerome and the band can maybe work this shit out for
me
And straighten me out right quick
I like it so far man
…Yeah, come on, lets go
[Chorus] (#1}
Welcome to the United Snakes
Land of the thief home of the slave
Grand imperial guard where the dollar is sacred and proud
Lets do this shit for real, come on now
[Verse 1]
Smoke and mirrors, stripes and stars
Stolen for the cross in the name of God
Bloodshed, genocide, rape and fraud
Written to the pages of the law good lord
The Cold Continent latch key child
Ran away one day and started acting foul
King of where the wild things are daddy’s proud
cos the Roman Empire done passed it down
Imported and tortured a work force
and never healed the wounds or shook the curse off
Now the grown up Goliath nation
Holdin open auditions for the part of David, can you feel it?
Nothing can save ya, you question the reign
You get rushed in and chained up
Fist raised but I must be insane
cos I can’t figure a single goddamn way to change it
[Chorus] {x2}
Welcome to the United Snakes
Land of the thief home of the slave
The grand imperial guard where the dollar is sacred and power is God
[Verse 2]
All must bow to the fat were lazy
The fuck you obey me and why do they hate me (who me?)
Only two generations away
from the world’s most despicable slavery trade
Pioneered so many ways to degrade a human being
that it can’t be changed to this day
Legacy so ingrained in the way that we think we no longer need chains
to be slaves
Lord it’s a shameful display
The overseers even got raped along the way
Cause the children cant escape from the pain
and they’re born with poisoness hatred in their veins
Try n’ separate a man from his soul
you only strengthen him and lose your own
But shoot that fucker if he walk near the throne
Remind him that this is my home (now I’m gone)
[Chorus] {x2}
Hold up give me one right here
Hold on
[Verse 3]
You don’t give money to the bums
on a corner with a sign bleeding from their gums
Talking about you don’t support a crackhead
What you think happens to the money from your taxes
Shit the governments an addict
With a billion dollar a week kill brown people habit
And even if you aint on the front line
when massah yell crunch time you right back at it
Plain look at how you hustling backwards
At the end of the year add up what they subtracted
Three outta twelve months your salary pays for that madness
Man, that’s savage
What’s left get a big ass plasma
To see where they made Dan Rather point the damn camera
Only approved questions get answered
Now stand your ass up for that national anthem
[Chorus] {x2}
[instrumental break]
[vocals: Mankwe Ndosi]
(You’re so low)
Custom made (You’re so low) *
To consume the noose (You’re so low) *
Keep saying we’re free (You’re so low) *
But we’re all just loose (You’re so low) *

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 24 2007 2:43 utc | 85

My, who wouldda thunk -“mans much vaunted Conquest of Nature” is a vain delusion…certainly not feminists…
So much for Unca Miltie’s Economic Model of My Money is My God I got mine & screw you and yours…
We mighta totally bloody blown it, we being the elites who refused to listed in ’65-’75. The Amazon? Huh, how can I make a buncha buckolas there? What else matters…Well, our very survival is dependent on the health of the Amazon Rain Forest as it turns out & that is more than precarious. If it has 3 years of drought, according to Woods Hole Study – & this yr. is shaping up as its 2nd – it could be toast; or if much more is cut down. They’ve cut down/wrecked 42%; 50% thought to be tipping point. Time to move Weather in the Amazon Rain Forest to the Top of Yr. List of Primary Concerns for This Year. A disaster to take everyone’s breath away
MANAUS – Deep in the heart of the world’s greatest rainforest, a nine-day journey by boat from the sea, Otavio Luz Castello is anxiously watching the soft waters of the Amazon drain away.
Every day they recede further, like water running slowly out of an immense bathtub, threatening a worldwide catastrophe.
Standing on an island in a quiet channel of the giant river, he points out what is happening. A month ago, the island was under water. Now, it juts 5m above it.
It is a sign that severe drought is returning to the Amazon for a second successive year. And that would be ominous. New research suggests that one further dry year beyond that could tip the whole vast forest into a cycle of destruction.

World State of by & for the Predators, here we go…

Posted by: jj | Jul 24 2007 3:26 utc | 86

financial times: China oil braves hostile terrain in Somalia

CNOOC’s willingness to strike an oil deal with the fragile government of Somalia, which has been a failed state for more than a decade, has provided stark evidence of China’s willingness to brave terrain that western oil majors deem too treacherous.
The state-owned Chinese oil giant has signed a production-sharing deal with the transitional federal government in the east African country, which ranks as a high-risk frontier even in an industry well accustomed to dangerous environments.
In doing so, CNOOC and its smaller partner, China International Oil and Gas, are gambling on three points. First, that the interim government has the authority to make such deals and will stay in power. Second, that violence stemming from perennial inter-clan conflicts and more recently Islamist extremism [sic] will not derail its work. Third – and most fundamentally – that the country has some oil worth extracting.
Several western oil majors held exploration concessions in Somalia in the 1980s, but fled in 1991 when the overthrow of dictator Siad Barre ushered in 16 years of chaos.
Ali Mohamed Gedi, Somalia’s interim prime minister, told the Financial Times last week that ConocoPhillips, Chevron, BP, Royal Dutch Shell and Eni would be invited to return and change their concessions into production-sharing agreements under a new oil law due to be published in the next two months.
But that looks like a distant prospect. BP, Shell and Eni say they still consider the concession deals to be subject to force majeure – code for unexpected and disruptive events that prevent contractual obligations from being met. Chevron and ConocoPhillips have declined to comment.

that’s strange. ft had two articles last week on the CNOOC deal & gedi’s reaction to it, yet they failed to mention the part about offering PSA’s to the western biggies.
somalia: Islamist chief urges Somalis to resist ‘new colonialists’

MOGADISHU, Somalia July 23 (Garowe Online) – The most influential leader in the ousted Islamic Courts movement has called upon the Somali people to resist what he termed “new colonialism” in the country.
Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys told Somali-language Universal TV on Monday that it is impossible to participate in a national reconciliation conference organized by the Ethiopian army.
” The Somali people must resist [this] new colonialism and must show their strength to expel the invaders,” Sheikh Aweys said.
The Islamist chief went on to say that it is unfortunate that some Somalis have accepted a reconciliation conference organized “by those who invaded the country.”
Sheikh Aweys urged Somalis to resist against plans to divide the country and its people.
Last year, Aweys was the most powerful man in southern Somalia as Islamist militias took [many somali’s, including the biz class, would probably prefer the term “liberate”] Mogadishu from notorious warlords by force and went on to capture [sic] other towns in the central and southern regions of the country.

the sham reconciliation conference is focusing on the TFG’s 4.5 clan formula, rather than political reconciliation, in order to establish dominance & maintain control over rents, once the oil exploration commences.

Posted by: b real | Jul 24 2007 3:49 utc | 87

First Chips Implanted in People on the Job

CityWatcher.com, a provider of surveillance equipment, attracted little notice itself — until a year ago, when two of its employees had glass-encapsulated microchips with miniature antennas embedded in their forearms.
The “chipping” of two workers with RFIDs — radio frequency identification tags as long as two grains of rice, as thick as a toothpick — was merely a way of restricting access to vaults that held sensitive data and images for police departments, a layer of security beyond key cards and clearance codes, the company said….
But CityWatcher.com employees weren’t appliances or pets: They were people, made scannable.
“It was scary that a government contractor that specialized in putting surveillance cameras on city streets was the first to incorporate this technology in the workplace,” says Liz McIntyre, co-author of “Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID….
“Ultimately,” says Katherine Albrecht, a privacy advocate who specializes in consumer education and RFID technology, “the fear is that the government or your employer might someday say, ’Take a chip or starve.”’”

Posted by: Bea | Jul 24 2007 14:00 utc | 88

not much in this article we don’t already know, but i did appreciate the following (crucial) point being made
black commentator: GWB, Africa and a New African American General

Most commentary on this situation avoids what I would consider the most important point: what right does the U.S. government have to interfere in the affairs of sovereign African nations? To intervene in their disputes? To promote the militarization of the continent? These questions seem to have eluded Rice, Frazer, Courville and company. But then again, they don’t make policy; they’re just doing their job.

black agenda report: A Tale of Two Genocides, Congo and Darfur: The Blatantly Inconsistent U.S. Position

Possibly a quarter million people have lost their lives in Darfur, western Sudan, in ethnic conflict. The U.S. government screams its head off in denunciation of genocide, in this case. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), as many as five million have died since 1994 in overlapping convulsions of ethnic and state-sponsored massacre. Not a word of reproach from Washington. A human death toll that approaches the Nazi’s annihilation of Jews in World War Two – an ongoing holocaust – unfolds without a whiff of complaint from the superpower.
Why is mass death the cause of indignation and confrontation in Sudan, but exponentially more massive carnage in Congo unworthy of mention? The answer is simple: in Sudan, the U.S. has a geopolitical nemesis to confront: Arabs, and their Chinese business partners. In the Congo, it is U.S allies and European and American corporate interests that benefit from the slaughter. Therefore, despite five million skeletons lying in the ground, there is no call to arms from the American government. It is they who set the genocidal Congolese machine in motion.

Posted by: b real | Jul 24 2007 14:45 utc | 89

Interesting detail from the current Gonzales hearing:
There is abook that tells US Attorneys how to handle investigations around voter fraud in time of elections.
That book was recently changed. (2008 coming up)
Restrictions on such prosecutions are now removed. Some US Attorneys had been fired because they did go by the “old” book.

Posted by: b | Jul 24 2007 14:56 utc | 90

Another one on the significance of the Turkish election result, and then a great comment from Paul Woodward of The War in Context:

The power struggle that is playing out in Turkey is one which is evident not only across the Middle East but around the world. It has much less to do with Islam versus secularism than it has with the struggle that lies at the heart of democracy: the political fight to wrest power from elites for whom government has long been a reliable servant of their own interests at the expense of others.
Those elites will always respond to such political challenges by presenting the threats they face as threats to the people, the nation, or even civilization, and they will use all the powers of the state, of the media, and of economic power, to reinforce this message of collective danger. Sooner or later though, there will be some form of rebellion by those who see that their interests are not being represented.
Americans unfortunately, brainwashed from infancy, regard the accumulation of excessive power and wealth as an expression of America’s greatness and thus have a tendency to fear criticizing their own elites as though to do so would be unAmerican. Ironically, in the nation which is the birthplace of modern democracy, the progress of democracy is mired by this crippling reverence for power.

Posted by: Bea | Jul 24 2007 15:04 utc | 91

Is it posssible…a voice of sanity?? What a cold gust of fresh air…
Policing Terrorism

When terrorists tried to blow up civilians in London and Glasgow, Gordon Brown, the new British prime minister, responded in his own distinctive way. What had just been narrowly averted, he said, was not a new jihadist act of war but instead a criminal act. As if to underscore the point, Brown instructed his ministers that the phrase “war on terror” was no longer to be used and, indeed, that officials were no longer even to employ the word “Muslim” in connection with the terrorism crisis. In remarks to reporters, Brown’s new home secretary, Jacqui Smith, articulated the basic message. “Let us be clear,” she said, “terrorists are criminals, whose victims come from all walks of life, communities and religions.”

I feel like writing these folks thank you notes… Seriously

Posted by: Bea | Jul 24 2007 15:10 utc | 92

From Bea #88 ’Take a chip or starve.’
A companion article:
Microchips mulled for HIV carriers in Indonesia’s Papua
Heck, I don’t even like having a social security number!

Posted by: Rick | Jul 24 2007 15:14 utc | 93

secrecynews: Joint Chiefs Issue Doctrine on “Homeland Defense”

A new publication of the Joint Chiefs of Staff presents U.S. military doctrine on “homeland defense”.
“It provides information on command and control, interagency and multinational coordination, and operations required to defeat external threats to, and aggression against, the homeland.”

The document further extends the unfortunate use of the term “homeland” to refer to the United States, a relatively recent coinage that became prevalent in the George W. Bush Administration.
Not only does the word “homeland” have unhappy echoes of the Germanic “Heimat” and the cult of land and soil, it is also a misnomer in a nation of immigrants.
Moreover, “homeland” is defined by the military exclusively in terms of geography: It is “the physical region that includes the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, United States territories and possessions, and surrounding territorial waters and airspace.”
This means that actions to defend the Constitution and the political institutions of American democracy are by definition excluded from “homeland defense.”
For the Joint Chiefs, constitutional liberties are subordinate to, and contingent upon, physical security:
“To preserve the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, the Nation must have a homeland that is secure from threats and violence, especially terrorism.” (page I-1).

Posted by: b real | Jul 24 2007 15:39 utc | 94

@b real #94
That document sure sends out a strong stench… Methinks that spells the death of the Republic. Why do I have the sinking feeling that all the pieces are being put in place for… something that is hard to even name.

Posted by: Bea | Jul 24 2007 16:11 utc | 95

Speaking of “strong stench”:
Sentient world: war games on the grandest scale

Even so, the US Department of Defense (DOD) may already be creating a copy of you in an alternate reality to see how long you can go without food or water, or how you will respond to televised propaganda.

After reading this, I feel like nothing more than livestock.

Posted by: Rick | Jul 24 2007 16:37 utc | 96

Recommended – Kissinger’s Secret Meeting With Putin

When a political heavyweight, like Henry Kissinger, jets-off on a secret mission to Moscow; it usually shows up in the news.
Not this time.
This time the media completely ignored—or should we say censored—Kissinger’s trip to Russia and his meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin. In fact, apart from a few short blurps in the Moscow Times and one measly article in the UK Guardian, no major news organization even covered the story. There hasn’t been as much as a peep out of anyone in the American media.
Nothing. That means the meetings were probably arranged by Dick Cheney. The secretive Veep doesn’t like anyone knowing what he’s up to.
Kissinger was accompanied on his junket by a delegation of high-powered political and corporate big-wigs including former Secretary of State George Schultz, former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, former Special Representative for Arms Control, Nonproliferation and Disarmament Ambassador Thomas Graham Jr., former Senator Sam Nunn and Chevron Chairman and Chief Executive Officer David O’Reilly.
Wow. Now, there’s an impressive line up.
The group was (presumably) sent to carry out official government business as discreetly as possible. The media obviously complied with White House requests and kept their mouths shut.

No one really knows what took place at the meetings, but judging by Kissinger’s parting remarks; things did not go smoothly. He said to one reporter, “We appreciate the time that President Putin gave us and the frank manner in which he explained his point of view.”
In diplomatic phraseology, “frank” usually means that there were many areas of strong disagreement. Presumably, the main “bone of contention” is Putin’s insistence on a “multi-polar” world in which the sovereign rights of other nations is safeguarded under international law. Putin is ferociously nationalistic and he will not compromise Russia’s independence to be integrated into Kissinger and Co.’s wacky the new world order.

Posted by: b | Jul 24 2007 17:14 utc | 97

Rick:
Livestock, schmivestock. As the Sacred Chao sez: MU

Posted by: catlady | Jul 24 2007 17:28 utc | 98

Ref: #31

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,2139456,00.html
Murdoch takeover causes angst at Dow Jones
“Not many people in the newsroom are happy. Rupert Murdoch blurs the line between what is truth and what is entertainment.” -WSJ Graphic Designer

Aw hell, another lazy ass drunk worried about losing his job!

Posted by: Rick | Aug 2 2007 4:43 utc | 99