Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
July 11, 2007
Annals of Tolerance

The Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) told the High Court of Justice that it was prepared to allow construction of the Museum of Tolerance on the site of an ancient Muslim cemetery in Jerusalem’s Mamila area, although an important archaeologist had determined that the excavation was far from complete.
IAA approves of building museum on ancient Muslim cemetery

The cementary was in use until at least 1948. It was stolen from its legal owners who fled from war or were kicked out of their homes in 1948. Israel has a unique absentees’ property law that allows to confiscates land owned by people currently not in Israel. Since 2004 the law is used to acquire land in east Jerusalem which Israel occupies since 1967.

Understandably, the Muslim community in Jerusalem is offended:

Ikrema Sabri, the Mufti of Jerusalem, demanded a halt to the excavations and said the Muslim religious authorities had not been consulted on the dig. Saying that the cemetery was in use for 15 centuries and that friends of the Prophet Mohamed were buried there, the Mufti declared: "There should be a complete cessation of work on the cemetery because it is sacred for Muslims."

Under Israel’s "absentee property" law the cemetery was taken over by the Custodian of Absentee Property after the 1948 war. Mr Saif said the Custodian had no right to sell the cemetery to the Jerusalem municipality in 1992.

The Jerusalem Museum of Tolerance is financed by the Los Angeles based Simon Wiesenthal Center which describes itself as a "Jewish human rights organization dedicated to repairing the world one step at a time." In Los Angeles the Center has its central Museum of Tolerance which "challenges visitors to confront bigotry and racism."

Comments

UK Member of Parliament Claire Short in a recent debate:

A massive machine with “Volvo” emblazoned on its side destroyed a substantial house that was built by a Palestinian family on their own land and in territory that belongs to the Palestinians under international law—formally, it is occupied territory.
Women relatives of the occupants quietly wept at the side of the road. Later, a young man was held back by his friends—he wanted to throw himself at the soldiers who were protecting the demolition, to do something about the destruction of his family home. The representative of ICAHD, a young Israeli, said that the demolition was, of course, a war crime. The point about that is that under the Geneva convention, an occupying power is not entitled to impose new laws or to settle in occupied territory. Houses are being demolished because Palestinians do not have permits to build, even on their own land. However, Israel is not entitled to introduce such a permit system. It never gives a permit to build a house, or after a house has been built. When Palestinian families expand, they must live somewhere, but Israel will never issue a permit because of its determination to drive Palestinians out of East Jerusalem.
According to ICAHD, Israel has demolished 18,000 Palestinian homes in the way I described since 1967. Each demolition was a war crime. More shocking than that is the fact that no action is taken to force Israel to adhere to international law.

Posted by: b | Jul 11 2007 12:49 utc | 1

Bernhard, I thought I had heard it all but this is in a league of its own. A league of obscenity, that is.
Great post, but a terribly tragic situation.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I wonder if there is anything that can be done to pressure the Wiesenthal Center to change its plan.

Posted by: Bea | Jul 11 2007 12:54 utc | 2

Just another brick in the wall of hypocrisy. Israel is so lost.

Posted by: Ben | Jul 11 2007 18:43 utc | 3

memory fucking memory

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jul 11 2007 19:03 utc | 4

it’s so damn absurd it makes me want to scream.

Posted by: annie | Jul 11 2007 19:29 utc | 5

They are shameless, full stop.
I read Claire Short’s speech, it was good but weak. She ref. to NGOs, etc, and remained low key, a factual description of her last ‘tour.’ Etc. Like a little flunkey reporting on a fact finding mission, all in order with da big bosses.
She has courage, probably few could do better, a tight spot in a hard place. I’m not critisizing her. But the framing of the discourse – Short can’t break it. No real position, no power.
For more perspective, see:
The Alvaro de Soto report, leaked by the Guardian. May 2007. *50* pages.
Was UN Special Coordinator for the ME peace process. Personal Rep. of the SG (Annan) to the PLO and the P. Authority. Envoy of the Quartet. (The post tagged for BLiar)
This is not a dry or pc document: snippet:
In trying to fulfill my mission in these circumstances, I have frequently felt like the Black Knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail who, after having both legs and arms lopped off by the King still accuses his adversaries of cowardice and threatens to bite off his legs. ..Since the election of Hamas I have been the SG’s personal Rep. to the PLO for about 10 or 15 minutes in two phone calls and one handshake.
de Soto supported Hamas – in the end, alone.
Read all the ins and outs from a guy on the ground.
de Soto PDF
Claire Short is allowed Media Exposure; short visit, short speech; the de Soto report is buried.

Posted by: Noirette | Jul 11 2007 19:35 utc | 6

Simon Wiesenthal and like-named Center are Zionist through-and-through. They are quite unlikely to respond to any arguments, especially those that are morally based.
The organization exists as a propaganda tool only; Their primary meme is that Jewish suffering during WW2 is preeminent. The suffering of others counts only as much as it can be used to reinforce the primary meme.

Posted by: Other Rouser | Jul 11 2007 22:26 utc | 7

um … now I get it …
castro nationalized all properties …
bush hates castro …
castro hates democracy …
bush loves democracy …
democracy loves property …
bush hates democrats …
bush loves israel democracy …
israelites love palestinian property …
israelites hate palestinians …
bush loves israelites …
laura bush is tolerant.

Posted by: dolce | Jul 12 2007 1:22 utc | 8

Prussia is gone but its spirit lives on in Israel.
It will all end the same way, whether it takes 10 or 1000 years, an army will raze Isreal for its violent arrogance.

Posted by: Northern Observer | Jul 13 2007 19:33 utc | 9

@Northern Observer – why “Prussia”? I don’t find any of Prussian values – the real ones before 1914 and certainly discussable, reflected in the current Israel.

Posted by: b | Jul 13 2007 19:54 utc | 10