Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
June 27, 2007
Where Are The Other ‘Family Jewels’?

Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard Nixon, under diligent supervision by Congress, ordered the CIA to conduct various illegal operations.

The activities included mass domestic wiretapping, failed assassination plots (Fidel Castro et al), successful assassination (Patrice Lumumba et al), mind-control experiments, illegal drug handling, cooperations with Mafia gangs, infiltration of citizen movements, abduction, spying on and manipulating journalists, partisan political support. All these crimes happend within the U.S. as well as abroad.

The now published but still heavily censored selective collection of CIA brummagem family jewels only includes documents up to 1973. Most of the plots described were already known. Where are the other, the real ‘family jewels’?

And do you believe that the praxis of illegal activities by the CIA and other government agencies has been discontinued after 1973?

If you do, please contact me immediately at ExclusiveOffer@BridgeSales.com.

Comments

This is a sort of vaccination process: they are willing to admit to a few “excesses in the defense of liberty” in the distant past in order to be able to remain mumm about more recent ones.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Jun 27 2007 10:12 utc | 1

Oooooo look! Shiny!

Posted by: beq | Jun 27 2007 11:12 utc | 2

I believe the “industry” term is “limited hang-out.”

Posted by: Bob M. | Jun 27 2007 11:23 utc | 3

According to the Associated Press story on this data dump, many pages have less text showing than when they were given to House and Senate Committees back in the 1970s.
As Bob M says, his was a classic limited hangout. And note the passivity and vagueness of the AP’s headline and the odd byline-
“CIA details spy scandal in old documents”
By MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN, Associated Press Writer
CIA details spy scandal in old [worthless] documents

CIA details spy scandal in old documents
By MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON – The CIA released hundreds of heavily censored documents Tuesday about its spying on Americans, foreign assassination plots and other misdeeds that triggered a scandal in the mid-1970s.
Known inside the CIA as the “family jewels,” the documents were released with vast sections blocked out by agency censors. As a result, they were far less revealing than the reports issued in the mid-1970s by the three investigations which obtained unedited versions of these internal CIA documents a generation ago.
The ensuing scandal sullied the reputation of the intelligence community and led to new rules for the CIA, FBI and other spy agencies and new permanent committees in Congress to oversee them.
The 693 pages, mostly drawn from the memories of active CIA officers in 1973, were turned over at that time to three different investigative panels — President Ford’s Rockefeller Commission, the Senate’s Church committee and the House’s Pike committee.
The panels spent years investigating and amplifying on these documents. And their public reports in the mid-1970s filled tens of thousands of pages.
In early 1975, CIA Director William Colby told the Justice Department that these documents detailed assassination plots against foreign leaders such as Fidel Castro, the testing of behavior-altering drugs on unwitting citizens, wiretapping of U.S. journalists, spying on civil rights and anti-Vietnam war protesters, opening of mail between the United States and the Soviet Union and China and break-ins at the homes of ex-CIA employees and others.
But as censored by the CIA, many of the most sensational events were mentioned in little more than one, sketchy paragraph apiece.
The new documents devoted two paragraphs to the programs that opened mail between U.S. citizens and the Soviet Union and China.
One paragraph said “Project WESTPOINTER,” from the fall of 1969 through October 1971, was based in the San Francisco area and the “target was mail to the United States from Mainland China.”
The other paragraph said a program, begun in 1953 but dormant by 1973, intercepted incoming and outgoing Russian mail, and occasionally other types of mail, at New York’s Kennedy Airport.
By contrast, the Senate committee headed by Frank Church, D-Idaho, which spent two years investigating these documents, produced a book-length study of 12 CIA and FBI mail opening programs from 1940 to 1973. It found that the CIA alone had opened and photographed almost 250,000 first class letters in the United States and produced a computerized CIA index of nearly 1.5 million names.
The agency’s new documents contained an unsigned three-page memo that described CIA’s program code named Operation CHAOS as a worldwide effort to collect information “on foreign efforts to manipulate U.S. extremism.” It said some American extremists had been recruited by the CIA and sent abroad as contract agents, but asserts that CHAOS “has not and is not conducting efforts domestically for internal domestic collection purposes.”
Another 1973 memo to Colby from the CIA inspector general expressed concern over CHAOS “because of the high degree of resentment we found among many agency employees at their being expected to participate in it.”
But the Church committee reported in 1976 that CHAOS compiled a computerized index of 300,000 individuals, including 7,200 Americans and more than 100 domestic groups between 1967-1973 as it examined civil rights and anti-Vietnam war protesters
.**
One of the most detailed descriptions in the newly released documents concerned one of the plots to kill the Cuban dictator Castro.
A memo by CIA security chief Howard Osborn said in August 1960 the CIA recruited ex-FBI agent Robert Maheu, who was a top aide to Howard Hughes in Las Vegas, to approach mobster Johnny Roselli and pass himself off as the representative of international corporations who wanted Castro killed.
Roselli introduced Maheu to “Sam Gold” and “Joe,” who were actually 10-most wanted mobsters Sam “Momo” Giancana, Al Capone’s successor in Chicago, and Santos Trafficante. The mobsters worked for free, turning down a $150,000 offer. The CIA gave them six poison pills, and they tried unsuccessfully for several months to have several people put them in the Cuban leader’s food.
This particular plot was dropped after the failed CIA-sponsored Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. Other plots continued against Castro though they are not detailed in the newly released documents. Details of this plot first appeared in Jack Anderson’s newspaper column in 1971.
The new releases devote one bare-bones paragraph to CIA involvement in a plot that resulted in Congolese Premier Patrice Lumumba’s assassination in 1961.
The Church committee produced a 364-page report on assassination plots that described at least eight plots involving the CIA to assassinate Castro between 1960 and 1965 and detailed how the CIA encouraged Congolese dissidents to kill Lumumba.
In a message to CIA employees Tuesday, Director Michael Hayden said: “It’s important to remember that the CIA itself launched this process of recollection and self-examination. And it was the Agency itself that shared the resulting documents in full with Congress.
“The collection as a whole was exhaustively reviewed in the 1970s by three outside investigative panels,” Hayden said. The documents provide “reminders of some things the CIA should not have done” and “a glimpse of a very different era and a very different agency,” he said.
The documents were one of the products of the Watergate scandal. Then-CIA Director James Schlesinger was angered to read in the newspapers that the CIA had provided support to ex-CIA agents E. Howard Hunt and James McCord, who were convicted in the Watergate break-in. Hunt had worked for a secret “plumbers unit” in Richard Nixon’s White House. The unit originally was tasked to investigate and end leaks of classified information but ultimately engaged in a wide range of misconduct.
In May 1973, Schlesinger ordered “all senior operating officials of this agency to report to me immediately on any activities now going on, or that have gone on the past, which might be construed to be outside the legislative charter of this agency.” The law establishing the CIA barred it from conducting spying inside the United States.
The result was 693 pages of memos whose contents Schlesinger’s successor, Colby, reported to the Justice Department.
“These are the top CIA officers all going into the confessional and saying, ‘Forgive me father, for I have sinned,'” said Thomas Blanton, director of the private National Security Archive, which had requested release of the documents under the Freedom of Information Act.
Some contents of these documents first spilled into public view Dec. 22, 1974, with a story by Seymour Hersh in The New York Times on the CIA’s spying against anti-war and other dissidents inside this country.
___
Associated Press writers Pete Yost and Jennifer Kerr contributed to this report.

When I read about the “Family Jewels Dump,” my first thought was: “Marketing Campaign.”
My second thought is: Why now?
My third thought is: When stuff like this happens, it’s often defensive, to immediately muddy the waters on some big potential revelation that they’re really trying to confuse. What is the real bombshell they’re working overtime to obfuscate? Something’s up.
**You know, like we are being monitored now. *waves at nice g-man, or g-man wannabe paid contract bootlicker and constitution ‘shitter on’*.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 27 2007 12:28 utc | 4

What is the real bombshell they’re working overtime to obfuscate?
maybe they want mainstream americans on board wrt the way we really operate. that way they won’t be in total shock mode when the next election is canceled.

Posted by: annie | Jun 27 2007 14:37 utc | 5

maybe they want mainstream americans on board wrt the way we really operate.
Yeah like, don’t be so shocked, we’ve been at this a long, long time folks. It’s a big bad world out there… and we have to keep on keepin’ on.

Posted by: Bea | Jun 27 2007 14:40 utc | 6

robert parry: Next Generation of ‘Family Jewels’?

Questions to ask
However, if CIA Director Michael Hayden wanted to go further than just accepting plaudits for releasing some ancient history, he would demand that CIA personnel answer questions about the following events from the 1970s and 1980s that collectively make the old Family Jewels look like child’s play:
–What is the full story about the CIA’s connection to a right-wing Latin American terror network known as Operation Condor, which carried out a series of international murders including a terrorist attack that killed Chilean dissident Orlando Letelier and American co-worker Ronni Moffitt on the streets of Washington in September 1976?
(The CIA, then run by George H.W. Bush, received warning messages from a U.S. ambassador about a plot by the Chilean government’s assassins to use the CIA as a cover for infiltrating into the United States, but Bush has never fully explained why he didn’t do more to prevent the Letelier-Moffitt murders.)
–What did the CIA know about the terrorist bombing of a civilian Cubana Airliner in October 1976 which killed 73 people, including youngsters on the Cuban national fencing team? Why has the U.S. government protected and harbored two of the implicated terrorists, Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada, to this day?
(Though George H.W. Bush ran for national office four times since the Cubana attack, he has never been pressed to give a thorough answer about his knowledge of the terror wave that occurred under his watch at CIA. Neither has George W. Bush been challenged over his decision to spare Posada from extradition to stand trial.)
–In 1980, what was the role of three CIA officers – Robert Gates, Donald Gregg and George Cave – in backchannel contacts between the Reagan-Bush campaign and Iranian Islamic radicals then holding 52 Americans hostage, a crisis that effectively doomed Jimmy Carter’s reelection bid?
(Gates, Gregg and Cave have denied involvement in the “October Surprise” case, but their alibis have never been carefully vetted. Gregg also failed a lie-detector test when he was asked about his role in this secret 1980 operation during Iran-Contra questioning. Despite extensive evidence that Republicans did contact Iran behind Carter’s back, congressional investigations into the scandal were, at best, half-hearted.)
–What did the CIA do to protect drug traffickers connected to two major paramilitary operations in the 1980s, the contras in Nicaragua and the mujahedeen in Afghanistan?
(Much of the U.S. news media – both right-wing and mainstream – dismissed the contra-cocaine allegations as a “conspiracy theory.” But the inspectors general of the CIA and the Justice Department made broad admissions about the prevalence of drug traffickers inside the contra operation in the 1980s – and the U.S. government’s failure to root them out. Those I.G. reports received little attention – or were simply ignored by major U.S. news outlets – when they were released in 1998.)
Moon’s Operation
–What is the relationship between U.S. intelligence and Sun Myung Moon’s organization? Why has Moon’s operation, with its relationships with crime kingpins in Asia and Latin America, escaped legal scrutiny even after it was exposed during the Korea-gate scandal in the late 1970s as a South Korean intelligence front?
(Though the Korea-gate findings contributed to Moon’s prosecution and conviction on tax charges in 1982, he and his organization have since become untouchables, a pattern of protection that some critics trace to Moon’s investment of billions of mysterious dollars in publishing the pro-Republican Washington Times, in financing a right-wing political infrastructure in the United States, and in putting money into the pockets of U.S. political leaders, including former President George H.W. Bush.)
–What was the CIA’s hand in the so-called “perception management” operations of the 1980s aimed at influencing how the American people perceived foreign-policy events?
(CIA Director William Casey took a direct interest in establishing a “perception management” operation based in the National Security Council under the guidance of long-time CIA officer Walter Raymond Jr. Though Raymond was “externalized” from the CIA by shifting him to the NSC, this sleight of hand violated at least the spirit of the prohibition against the CIA influencing Americans through distribution of propaganda.)
–What did the CIA know about clandestine weapons shipments to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s?
(Former Reagan administration official Howard Teicher has written in a sworn affidavit that then-Vice President George H.W. Bush, CIA Director William Casey and then-deputy CIA director Robert Gates played secret roles in arranging military assistance to Saddam Hussein’s government. But the full story has never been told.)
–Was the CIA aware of the 1985 activities of Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger and his assistant, Gen. Colin Powell, in arranging illegal shipments of weapons to Iran?
(Ronald Reagan’s National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane has testified that he described the operation to Weinberger and Powell in 1985 before there was a presidential intelligence finding and thus when the shipment of U.S. weapons through Israel was illegal. Weinberger denied knowledge and Powell claimed a faulty memory. Then, President George H.W. Bush blocked the truth when he pardoned Weinberger on Christmas Eve 1992, thus preventing Weinberger’s Iran-Contra trial and sparing Powell some embarrassing questions.)

Posted by: b real | Jun 27 2007 21:12 utc | 7

John Dinges has a good book out on the Condor operation.

Posted by: mikefromtexas | Jun 28 2007 1:00 utc | 8

I guess this article belongs more properly here than on the OT:
THE GATES INHERITANCE
by Roger Morris
Part 1 The tortured world of US intelligence
Part 2 Great games and famous victories
Part 3 The world that Bob made
Bob Gates’ career against the background of US intelligence establishment’s bloody and Byzantine history. Very long read, but I found it fascinating.

Posted by: Alamet | Jun 28 2007 1:12 utc | 9

Is there any limit to these people’s depravity?
Agency’s Strangeloves altered mind of a girl aged 4

Posted by: Rick | Jun 29 2007 4:13 utc | 10

From Rick’s link-
“The CIA bought my services from my grandfather in 1952 starting at the tender age of four,” wrote Carol Rutz of her experiences.
“Over the next 12 years, I was tested, trained, and used in various ways. Electroshock, drugs, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, and other types of trauma were used to make me complain and split my personality (to create multiple personalities for specific tasks). Each alter or personality was created to respond to a post-hypnotic trigger, then perform an act and (I would) not remember it later.
“This Manchurian Candidate program was just one of the operational uses of the mind-control scenario by the CIA.
“Your hard-earned tax dollars supported this.”

This scenario fits into the Washington Times expose of the child prostitution ring that was allegedly used to blackmail pols from other countries and the U.S. This is the closest any govt agency has come to admitting exploitation of children…what’s the big leap from buying a kid from a grandparent and drugging them to prostituting them?
google video has the program yanked from the Discovery Channel about the Franklin Cover-up
…The programs, though carefully hidden, continued into the 1970s – when Helms ordered much of the documentation to be destroyed.
And of course, Helms was a Poppy Bush man and lied to Congress during the Church hearings, was convicted, and had his sentence suspended. And just for good measure, his daughter, Lelia, was part of the Afghanistan nat’l gas pipeline negotiations pre-invasion.

Posted by: fauxreal | Jun 29 2007 13:22 utc | 11

The attorney for Sirhan Sirhan, Lawrence Teeter, has said his client was programmed to assassinate Robert Kennedy in 1968.
Theodore Kaczynski, the Unabomber, volunteered to take part in CIA mind-control experiments when he was a student at Harvard University in the late 50s.
Third cover-up of the bogus ‘Family Jewels’ dump-
Lying about Operation Mockingbird
Playing up the ‘mafia dunnit’ cover story on JFK’s murder
Reinforcing the false imprisonment of Sirhan Sirhan for RFK’s murder..
Sirhan did not shoot RFK.
Ballistics and forensics proved this but coroner Thomas Noguchi was not allowed to testify at Sirhan’s ‘trial
.’
So this nasty bit about the 4-year old and admitting to Manchurian Candidate programs is clever viral marketing to sustain the frame-up of Sirhan for a murder carred out by Thane Eugene Cesar, RFK’s bogus bodyguard who shot him from point blank at his right rear with the help of CIA perps like hypnotist William Joseph Bryan who hypnotized the patsy and LAPD’s Manuel Pena who carried out the cover-up by running the compartmentalized Special Unit Senator and burying all evidence that contradicted the cover story of the ‘angry Arab.’
Problem is, the nasty bit about CIA/Deep State-directed experimentation on children is true and this is the main hook of the article (the title even!) even if such was not explicitly mentioned in the “Family Jewels” release. Shouldn’t that be the virus we need to grapple with?
Now, aside from the importance of this topic and the ample documentation and witness to the truth of this matter – and putting aside our stance on psychiatry/psychology – might there be another “frame-up” at hand? Namely, is the author of The Australian piece, Robert Lusetich, a Scientologist?
Meanwhile CIA media assets continue to mind-control all Americans who don’t know what is going on.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 29 2007 13:46 utc | 12

short video by guerilla news network on mkultra
the most dangerous game
wars are not won on the battlefield. they’re won in the minds of the people.

Posted by: b real | Jun 29 2007 14:41 utc | 13

gee Uncle, call me crazy, but viral marketing because the assassination of RFK is more important than child abuse?
I kind of think that lots of people would think it’s worse to abuse a child than to assassinate a politician. Children are defenseless and must rely upon adults. The abuse of children gets people killed in prison…you know, the moral system of those incarcerated even deems child abuse worse than murder of an adult.
Since the document page number is given, according to the newspaper article, I do not understand why you try to discredit the messenger. I haven’t seen the document, but I should read it and find that particular page for myself, obviously. However, maybe you might want to reconsider the importance of the event reported, regardless of who is reporting it. The Washington Times is also a whack job and Moon is certainly not worth a dime, but they were the source that brought the Franklin Case to the attention of the American public.
Maybe that was “limited hang-out” too… have a disreputable source provide the info so that the info could be discredited by association.

Posted by: fauxreal | Jun 29 2007 23:05 utc | 14

gee Uncle, call me crazy, but viral marketing because the assassination of RFK is more important than child abuse?
Uh, where the hell do you think I said that? especially, since I have brought up abuse of children and also the infamous Franklin case myself on several occasions. Perhaps, your once again, being over reactive? Geez, step away from the internet sometimes fauxreal.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 29 2007 23:48 utc | 15

in fact, page 00425 of the “family jewels” – I went to the Nat’l Security Archives for the pdf. – does not mention children at all.
the reporter extrapolates from a one paragraph mention of MKUltra experiments and extends them to children based upon Carol Rutz’s memories. (I found a speech she gave here. (Nov. 2003)
Her statement sounds extremely far-fetched, but then there is the reality of the experiments she mentions (pregnant mothers given radiation w/o their knowledge) and the Tuskegee experiments.
And recently, Jon Ronson wrote about “the men who stare at goats.” which relates experiments into the supernatural on the part of the military (so, whether what Rutz claims at true vis a vis the supernatural, the military was trying to use “psychic power” to kill — and they were trying to walk through walls…
Online Journal has info about Gottlieb, mentioned by Rutz.
Gottlieb -via Spartacus.
Counterpunch obit
seems Gottlieb was involved in Project Artichoke – and the resulting death of Frank Olson.

Posted by: fauxreal | Jun 30 2007 0:08 utc | 16

So this nasty bit about the 4-year old and admitting to Manchurian Candidate programs is clever viral marketing to sustain the frame-up of Sirhan for a murder carred out by Thane Eugene Cesar…
did I misunderstand that this was not meant to say that the release of info about children was to keep a frame up of Sirhan? what did I misunderstand about this? I don’t think I over-reacted to the “sharing my complacency,” either, but I don’t hold anything against anyone for the comment. However, I felt it needed to be addressed.
thanks for the advice about stepping away from the computer. I work two jobs and have gotten online for the first time today to read the news since I went to work at one of them this morning.
I suppose my over-reaction is taking people at their words as they appear on the screen and responding to them. how terrible of me.

Posted by: fauxreal | Jun 30 2007 0:14 utc | 17