Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
June 10, 2007
What Other Program?

Back in mid May I had some suspicion around the Comey testimony. While Deputy Attorney General JamesComey rushed to the hospital where Gonzales and Card were trying to convince Ashcroft to sign off a special program he also alarmed FBI director Mueller. Later on Mueller like Comey and some 30 other folks threatened to resign over the White House’s handling of the program.

As the original eavesdropping program was about foreign calls to the U.S., not domestic ones, I asked Why Was FBI Director Mueller Involved?

I suggested that a different, so far unknown program was involved. Now via Think Progress there is some confirmation.

Last week Steven Bradbury, the principal deputy assistant attorney general and the head of the Office of Legal Counsel testified before a Congress sub-committee:

REP. WATT: I’m not asking you to make anything public. I’m asking you, does that mean that the former attorney general had some reservations about — legal reservations about some aspects of the program, Mr. Bradbury?

MR. BRADBURY: Well, all I’ll say is what the attorney general has said, which is that disagreements arose, disagreements were addressed and resolved; however, those disagreements did not — were not about the particular activities that the president has publicly described, that we have termed the Terrorist Surveillance Program.

The disagreement happened in March 2004, the start of the election season. It was about some illegal domestic program and the White House was heavily involved.

My best guess is that this program was digging up dirt about political oppenents.

There is no proof for this yet, but usually some D.C. insider will spill the beans on stuff like this one or the other day.

Stay tuned …

Comments

Clearly, Bernhard, since you persist in raising these uncomfortable questions, you are not with the program at all.
This will be noted in your file . . .
But seriously, as my saintly grandmother used to say, during that portion of her day when she was upright, at home, wearing clothes, and sober, “People who have launched illegal wars of conquest, repeatedly stolen national and local elections, emptied the national Treasury, indebted the next six generations up to their eyeballs, and abandoned the working person will be sorely tempted to engage in political blackmail as well.”
It would be totally out of character for them to NOT attempt to gain a stranglehold on their political adversaries.

Posted by: Antifa | Jun 10 2007 14:26 utc | 1

pretty cool grandma Antifa. those old folks are not so easily fooled, not like us young-uns at all.
just when you think it can’t get any worse, ……. it does.

Posted by: dan of steele | Jun 10 2007 14:32 utc | 2

of course! the rovester’s all about blackmail. all’s fair in love ‘n war ‘n all that stuff.
hell antifa, i could tell you that naked, flat on my back and drunk. of course usually i’m at home in that condition.

Posted by: annie | Jun 10 2007 16:29 utc | 3

Grandma Antifa was an optimist.
All this brings back to me Ross Perot’s campaign in 1992. Was he genuinely crazy/paranoid, or were the Republicans really threatening him and his family? Did he drop out because of threats and/or blackmail? Was this crap going on back then?

Posted by: Ensley | Jun 10 2007 18:13 utc | 4

you gotta wonder about Perot, he had some people from inside who might have been able to help him. I have heard the story about how he got his EDS employees out of Iran from people who were there and it was quite interesting, it had to do with ex spooks and ex special forces. H Ross knows his way around but nevertheless is and was new money. I think he got in over his head and knew it was time to get out. the thing that pissed me off about his campaign is when he paraded that old addled Admiral out as his VP….I thought that was kind of a slap in the face and I turned on him in that very instance. He may have understood that he was not going to close that sale and found a way out.

Posted by: dan of steele | Jun 10 2007 21:12 utc | 5