Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
June 5, 2007
OT 07-39

News & views …

Please comment.

Comments

Two issues that will make news today:
a. Bradley Schlozman, a “true Bushie”, will have to answer questions today in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Yesterday the LA Times had this to say about him:

In March 2006, Schlozman was given an interim appointment as the U.S. attorney in Kansas City, replacing Graves.
Less than a week before the November election, Schlozman obtained indictments of four members of the liberal activist group Assn. of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, for allegedly submitting fraudulent voter registrations. The Justice Department election manual says prosecutors should refrain generally from bringing cases just before elections, out of concern that the charges could affect voting.
ACORN itself had brought the case to the attention of authorities after discovering that some of its employees were making up names of registrants as part of a voter-registration drive.
Schlozman’s office, apparently in a hurry to file the case, got one of the names on the indictments wrong.

b. Irvine Libby will collect his sentence today. Fitzgerald is asking for 30-35 month. The interesting part is if Libby will get probabtion or be frog marched out of the court into jail. If he goes to jail will Bush immediately pardon him?
After the sentencing the court will also release the letters people wrote to court on his behalf. There will be some embaressing issues in there.

Posted by: b | Jun 5 2007 12:51 utc | 1

comment by Rick who for some reason has trouble to post this:
From accuweather.com

A rare event is taking place in the Arabian Sea. Powerful tropical Cyclone Gonu with sustained winds of 160 mph as of Monday afternoon was taking dead aim toward the north coast of Oman. A landfalling tropical cyclone is almost unprecedented for Oman, which barely gets any rain to speak of, even from thunderstorms during this time of year. Gonu is expected to weaken as it approaches the coast early Wednesday, but strong winds and heavy rain are still likely.

Also see The Oil Drum for an interesting outlook regarding this storm.

Posted by: b | Jun 5 2007 15:42 utc | 2

libby 30 months
he won’t see the inside

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 5 2007 16:06 utc | 3

I can’t get to the Oil Drum but found this.

Posted by: beq | Jun 5 2007 16:45 utc | 4

Have a laugh at this Blown-up Swaskita or Lisa Simpson giving a blow-job.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jun 5 2007 16:47 utc | 5

no sure yet r’giap
emtywheel writes:

As to bond pending appeal, Walton basically said no, but Defense can submit a memo. That is due on Thrsday, and then the govt’s is due on Tuesday, with Libby’s response due on Wednesday. If Walton decides against bond pending appeal after reading those motions, then it all goes to the prison system and Libby goes to jail in normal schedule, which would be about 45-60 days.

(Walton is the judge)

Posted by: b | Jun 5 2007 16:50 utc | 6

we will see, b
tho i’d dearly love for libby to do some hard time

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 5 2007 17:20 utc | 7

The London Olympic logo is a fine example of British culture: the stuff that people do unfunded or for next to nothing in their own homes, community centers and back yards is brilliant, the stuff that gets awarded multi-million-pound grants is offensively bad.
Perhaps they can arrange to have a large London olympics logo painted on the ceiling of Libby’s cell…

Posted by: ralphieboy | Jun 5 2007 17:53 utc | 8

secrecynews: Letters on Scooter Libby Released by Court

Letters sent to Judge Reggie B. Walton regarding the sentencing of vice presidential aide Lewis I. “Scooter” Libby, who was convicted of obstruction of justice, were released by the court today.

Most of the letters favor clemency for Mr. Libby. Many of them are poignant and heartfelt. Quite a few others are pompous and self-aggrandizing. An angry minority demand the maximum possible sentence.
The full set of letters in alphabetical order by author may be found here (373 pages in an 18 MB PDF file).
Mr. Libby was sentenced to two and a half years in prison and fined $250,000.

Posted by: b real | Jun 5 2007 18:37 utc | 9

Schlozman hearing on CSpan3
He started off with lauding himself to heaven
Sen. Leathy is now letting some air out that balloon

Posted by: b | Jun 5 2007 18:51 utc | 10

definitely was a suggested form letter for libby’s friends to consider. lots of matches for the use of the paraphrase ‘is inconsistent with the libby i know’, some ‘i was stunned when i heard the verdict’, etc…
the letter on page 118 is kinda interesting.

Dear Judge Walton:
I am a citizen of the United States. My primary occupation for the past thirty years is a a businessman. In 1985 I founded a chemical company which is today a multi-national chemical and fertilizer company, headquartered in New York, New York.
Shortly after Mr. Ariel Sharon was elected to his first term as Israel Prime Minister, he had asked me to fulfill the role of a private confidential channel between him and the then the Secretary of State Colin Powell and the White House.[sic]
During the years of 2002 and 2003, I had the responsiblity and privilege to serve in that role. It is during that period that among other high U.S. government officials, I met Mr. Scooter Libby.

you can read the rest. the author is one arie genger, founder of trans resources, inc, and protege of alleged gangster meshulam riklis.

Posted by: b real | Jun 5 2007 19:34 utc | 11

Schlozman – 18 times “I don’t recall” but I’m not sure I did caught ’em all. He had 30 hours of total preparation (training) for the hearing. Otherwise nothing new, but only “others did it/told me/ordered me”.

Posted by: b | Jun 5 2007 20:46 utc | 12

Schlozman, what a show, entertainment for the political junkies to be sure, but not substance.
yeah we’ve sure heard a lot of talk about ” the new sheriff in town.’ when the dems took over. We’re ‘makin’ good progress’. Soon, we’ll be “turnin’ the corner”! Sound familiar?
Yeah, We’ll have another investigation and invite more people to testify. When they decline, we’ll huff and puff and invite them again. When they flick us the bird, we’ll threaten a subpoena. When they announce that they’ll not honor the subpoena, we’ll warn them of dire circumstances. Some will come, most wont recall. They’ll be given immunity in exchange for testimony and then they’ll refuse to turn over documents and then take the fifth on the stand. And still not recall or point fingers; ‘Not me’.
When they stop laughing, we’ll hold our breath until we turn blue in the face. Then stomp our feet and threaten to send the “strongly worded letter”.
What a circle jerk.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 5 2007 23:02 utc | 13

hahahaha….
GOP leaders plot to thwart Abu ‘no confidence’

According to a Capitol Hill newspaper, “If Senate Democrats press ahead next week with their plan to hold a no-confidence vote on embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, it is unclear whether any of Gonzales’ GOP critics will go along — and the Senate Republican leadership is ginning up plans to thwart the measure.”
“Six GOP Senators have gone on the record essentially demanding Gonzales’ resignation, and one of them — Sen. Tom Coburn (Okla.) — already has declared he’ll vote against the nonbinding no-confidence resolution,” Rachel Van Dongen reports for Roll Call.
The article continues, “The five others — Sens. John Sununu (N.H.), Chuck Hagel (Neb.), Gordon Smith (Ore.), John McCain (Ariz.) and Norm Coleman (Minn.) — were unwilling to tip their hands about how they will vote, despite repeated attempts to contact them last week.”
According to Roll Call, “Republicans are likely to tie up the Senate floor with all kinds of procedural mischief and introduce any number of amendments, including perhaps one on whether the Iraq War is actually ‘lost’ as Reid has suggested.”
The expanding Justice probe, which seems to reveal a new embarrassment for the administration every week, underlines why a no-confidence vote could put Republicans in a bind. Despite GOP skepticism that Gonzales can remain effective on the job, it is uncertain whether that translates into a vote supporting Democrats’ bid to throw him out.
Coburn, for instance, who has been harshly critical of Gonzales, already has chosen sides and plans on opposing the motion. In a May 22 letter to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Coburn said he would like to be notified before the Senate enters into any unanimous consent request to consider the Gonzales motion. Coburn notified McConnell that if the motion comes to the floor, he plans to introduce an amendment “expressing no confidence in Congress’s ability to cut wasteful spending or balance the budget.”

What a game…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 5 2007 23:19 utc | 14

Outgoing pResident will pardon Libby and all the rest; it’s traditional.

Posted by: Anonymous | Jun 5 2007 23:59 utc | 15

Important if true:
Militants surrender to Fatah in Lebanon


A Fatah leader told United Press International Tuesday that eight members of the extremist militant Fatah al-Islam group “surrendered” to the mainstream Fatah movement in the Nahr al-Bared Palestinian refugee camp near the northern port city of Tripoli.
The leader, speaking on condition of anonymity, also said that two senior commanders from the same group are ready to surrender along with a number of others, but with guarantees, which he did not specify.
He added that around a dozen Fatah al-Islam fighters, who have been battling the army since May 20 in and around Nahr al-Bared camp, have escaped the fighting, leaving their weapons behind.

Posted by: Alamet | Jun 6 2007 0:01 utc | 16

Maybe I’m just in a really bad mood, but

Leave it to a Republican Party official, of course, to spelunk our national dialogue into a whole new low. This latest installment for the You-Gotta-Be-Kidding-Me file came on Sunday, courtesy of the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, in an interview with that state’s new Republican Party chairman. His name is Dennis Milligan, he runs a water treatment business [emohasis mine — DeA], and he is very much hoping for more terrorist attacks on US soil so the policies of George W. Bush can be vindicated.
Yes, you read that correctly. Here’s the quote:
“At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on (September 11, 2001), and the naysayers will come around very quickly to appreciate not only the commitment for President Bush, but the sacrifice that has been made by men and women to protect this country.”

footnote
really haunts me.
he thinks another Turrist Event would be a Good Thing for his party and the country; and he runs a water treatment business? oh please, Scotty, beam me up quick.

Posted by: DeAnander | Jun 6 2007 0:04 utc | 17

A long, hard look at the new Foreign Minister of France.
Bernard Kouchner: Media Doc of “Humanitarian Intervention”


Kouchner has not “gone over to the right”: that is where he has been for about three decades, but the Socialist Party has been too opportunistic to pay attention. May 1968 was probably the last time Kouchner was really on the left, but he has been dining out on that reputation ever since, as charter member of the media elite known as the “caviar left”.
In May 1968, Kouchner jumped into the political fray as a strike leader in the medical faculty of the University of Paris. His opposition to the establishment did not last long. Four months later, he joined a medical team organized by the French government to provide humanitarian aid to the short-lived secessionist republic of Biafra. This medical mission was the humanitarian side of an undercover French intervention that also provided military aid to the Biafra rebels, whose breakaway region in southeastern Nigeria happened to include the country’s vast oil resources.

Kouchner is a selective humanitarian. The victims who arouse his indignation always just happen to be favored by French or U.S. imperial interests: the Biafrans, the non-communist Vietnamese, the Albanians of Kosovo. He never got so excited by the plight of Nicaraguan victims of U.S.-backed Contra murders and sabotage in the 1980s, nor about ethnic cleansing of Serbs and Roma in Kosovo after he took over, much less about Palestinian victims of Israeli ethnic cleansing.

Posted by: Alamet | Jun 6 2007 0:07 utc | 18

A Jewish perspective on Sarkozy can be found here. A different in-depth look at who he is and how he became that way.

Posted by: Bea | Jun 6 2007 1:36 utc | 19

You Can’t Make This Stuff Up Dept.
Greg Palast has been a busy guy the last couple of years. Tonight he presents another good investigation, this time about
Vulture Funds.

Posted by: Rick | Jun 6 2007 3:05 utc | 20

Conyers to challenge Bush on Vulture Funds.

Conyers has personally informed George Bush that he expects the President to join the other G8 leaders to put the vultures out of business. “I’m counting on the President to do the right thing,” Conyers told BBC reporter Greg Palast. But if the President doesn’t, Bush can expect another set of investigations and hearings on the Administration’s inaction and ties to vultures.

Posted by: Rick | Jun 6 2007 3:14 utc | 21

Oh, and there’s a little bit of weather in Oman- see The Oil Drum.

Posted by: biklett | Jun 6 2007 5:20 utc | 22

rick, good report. i watched the video conyers rocks.

Posted by: annie | Jun 6 2007 5:49 utc | 23

At least vultures play a vital role in the ecosystem by preventing the spread of disease from carcasses.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Jun 6 2007 16:17 utc | 24

robert dreyfuss: Financing the imperial armed forces

War critics are rightly disappointed over the inability of Democrats in the US Congress to mount an effective challenge to President George W Bush’s Iraq adventure. What began as a frontal assault on the war, with tough talk about deadlines and timetables, has settled into something like a guerrilla-style campaign to chip away at war policy until the edifice crumbles.
Still, Democratic criticism of Bush administration policy in Iraq looks muscle-bound when compared with the party’s readiness to go along with the president’s massive military buildup, domestically and globally. Nothing underlines the tacit alliance between so-called foreign-policy realists and hardline exponents of neo-conservative-style empire-building more than the Washington consensus that the United States needs to expand the defense budget without end, while increasing the size of the armed forces.
In addition, spending on the 16 agencies and other organizations that make up the official US “intelligence community” – including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) – and on homeland security is going through the roof.
The numbers are astonishing and, except for a hardy band of progressives in the House of Representatives, Democrats willing to call for shrinking the bloated Pentagon or intelligence budgets are in essence non-existent.

How astonishing are the budgetary numbers? Consider the trajectory of US defense spending over the past nearly two decades. From the end of the Cold War into the mid-1990s, defense spending actually fell significantly. In constant 1996 dollars, the Pentagon’s budget dropped from a peacetime high of $376 billion, at the end of president Ronald Reagan’s military buildup in 1989, to a low of $265 billion in 1996. That compares with post-World War II wartime highs of $437 billion (corrected) in 1953, during the Korean War, and $388 billion in 1968, at the peak of the Vietnam War.
After the Soviet empire peacefully disintegrated, the 1990s decline wasn’t exactly the hoped-for “peace dividend”, but it wasn’t peanuts, either. However, since September 12, 2001, defense spending has exploded.
For 2008, the Bush administration is requesting a staggering $650 billion, compared with the already staggering $400 billion the Pentagon collected in 2001. Even subtracting the costs of the ongoing “global war on terrorism” – which is what the White House likes to call its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan – for fiscal 2008, the Pentagon will still spend $510 billion.
In other words, even without Bush’s two wars, defense spending will have nearly doubled since the mid-1990s. Given that the United States has literally no significant enemy state to fight anywhere on the planet, this represents a remarkable, if perverse, achievement.

Posted by: b real | Jun 6 2007 18:41 utc | 25

The War abroad and the War at home…
Iraqi group says reaches ceasefire with al Qaeda
Bureau of Prisons can suspend attorney-client privileges

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 6 2007 19:49 utc | 26

ODNI Document Suggests a Larger Intelligence Budget

Classified budget numbers concealed in an unclassified PowerPoint document suggest that total U.S. intelligence spending is significantly larger than generally assumed, perhaps around $60 billion annually.

The data appear to indicate that $42 billion was awarded to contractors in FY 2005. If so, and if that represented 70% of the total budget, as stated in the preceding Power Point slide, it would follow that the total is $60 billion, rather than the $45 or $48 billion usually cited.

(Office of the Director of National Intelligence – ODNI)
Anyone wonders what else is financed with those billions?

Posted by: b | Jun 6 2007 20:30 utc | 27

Meet Rahm (dual citizenship) Emanuel and the “New Democrats”.
Also, I’m not a big fan of DU but, a friend sent me the following and and I take my truth where I find it; it is worth the read:

Radical changes are coming and the candidates can’t or won’t tell you
watch in amazement as post after post in this forum sings the praises of one candidate or another. Did you hear Obama’s plan for x? Did you see Hillary’s poll numbers in South Carolina? it must be a very nice thing to be a true believer.
for many here, the mantra is all about the evils bush has brought. well, no argument there. he has virtually dismantled all that was good about our government. clearly, and I never thought anyone could top Nixon, bush is and will always remain the worst person ever to occupy the White House. but bush is “transitory”. to those who think the real enemy is just bush, you’re missing the bigger picture. you’ve allowed your legitimate disdain for him to shield you from the longer term crises we face.
and some hear arguments like this post’s theme and start the drumbeat about “why do you post here” or “are you saying there’s no difference between the parties” or “yeah, look at all the great things Nader brought us” … the answer? no, that’s not the point at all …
some of us, somehow we’ve been labeled “the left”, believe that our systems and institutions are collapsing. we believe our lifestyles can no longer be sustained. we believe our ability to procure the oil we need will soon start to fail. we believe, on a massive scale especially in the west, that water will not be available to major cities. we believe that global warming will be the final nail in all our coffins.
radical changes ARE GOING TO OCCUR in this country and they are going to occur very soon. it might be 2 years or 5 or 10 but have no doubt, they are going to occur. a rational and conservative approach to this onslaught of horrors would be to start aggressively addressing it now. we’ve seen elements of that in Al Gore’s crusade. I commend him for what he’s done. But the little changes, the incrementalism, being discussed in our electoral campaigns is woefully inadequate. the sad part is, we the people and our electoral system might well shun a candidate who even mentions the darkness we face. if our campaigns fear they are not free to lead, we find ourselves in a situation where there is no leadership. i’m afraid that is the state of the national dialog.
to take just one of many examples, what candidate will stand up and call for gas rationing? i posted a thread about that on DU and those who think themselves “liberals” were up in arms about it. how dare you impose your authoritarian restrictions on us!!!! they aren’t liberals; they’re libertarians.
guess what? we are seeing gas rationing happening right now. it is capitalist gas rationing. if you can’t afford it, don’t buy it. is that a “liberal” way to apportion gasoline to citizens? i don’t think so. in the absence of quality mass transit, gasoline for many is a necessity. what do these so called liberals say to the poor? tough!!!! they have no answer. what does Obama say about gas rationing? Hillary? any of them? the point is that absent a system that fairly allocates gasoline, the rationing system is based only on PRICE. thanks very much, liberals. thanks for supporting the capitalist status quo.
the main point is that our process of electing people is badly crippled. the current system demands so much money that those who have money, the ultimate supporters of the status quo, must be catered to. any visionary trying to run would be immediately ostracized. think of it this way: if you are the candidate talking about the need for radical change, most voters don’t yet see the need for that change. it would be easy to paint you as a “far lefty” or a crackpot or an extremist. does that make the vision you have wrong? of course not. it just makes you unelectable. the problem is, the rest of the candidates are all going on about how the world is flat. they’re just plain wrong. but then everyone knows the world is flat. we’ve always known it. and so, the flat worlders and their cheerleaders live happily ever after. until they don’t.
the radical changes are just around the corner. the sooner we see them and prepare for them, the less rough things will be. in the meantime, those waving their little candidate flags may not be helping the situation at all. we need to demand real answers from those seeking to lead. we cannot allow the current “status quo incrementalism” to continue. it’s up to us. we only get the leadership we demand.

the poster goes on to give an excerpt from an article by the author of The Long Emergency that is also well worth your time(I’ll post that snippet here too):

If nothing else, the amount of money that the candidates need to raise — and burn through in airplane charters, staff salaries, and staged events — puts them all in jeopardy of corrupting themselves to the various donors desperate to preserve their prerogatives under the status quo.
What everybody seems to sense semi-consciously is that the status quo is dragging the US into an abyss. But so far, no one among the declared candidates has been able or willing to express a coherent view of what it is in the status quo, exactly, that is doing the dragging. One undeclared figure, Al Gore, has presented the climate change part of the story and pretty much stopped there — perhaps sensing that if he ventured to offer views on anything else, he’d start sounding like an actual candidate. But my guess is that the really important issues will never be articulated in the course of this campaign because they are too painful for the public to hear. And so all the premature debating and posturing will amount to a smokescreen of words meant to conceal the fact that we are a nation without confidence that any leadership can guide us into a plausible future.
Here are the some of truths that we seem unable to face:
Very soon we won’t have the fossil fuel energy supplies to run the USA as it is currently set up, and no combination of wished-for alternative energy schemes based on so-called “renewables” will allow us to keep running it, either. Meaning, that we’d better start making other arrangements immediately for how we occupy the landscape, how we grow our food, how we move people and things from place to place, and how we reconstruct an economy consistent with these new arrangements.
The longer we put off making these new arrangements, the harder we’re going to slam into a wall of reality, and when it occurs a lot of things will shake loose in this country. It will become self-evident that the things we’ve invested all our wealth in will not retain value — especially suburban real estate and all the activities related to car dependency, from the interstate highway system to national chain retail. It will also become obvious that we can’t base our economy on building more of this stuff.
Our current military adventures in the Middle East, are predicated largely on keeping the old arrangements going. We’re in Iraq because we built Dallas, Atlanta, Orlando, Houston, Phoenix, Los Angeles, and Long Island the way we did, and the only way we can hope to keep these organisms going even a little while longer is to keep open our oil supply line to the Persian Gulf. The truth is, these organisms will not survive the oil-scarcer future in the form they’re in. The American people need to come to grips with this. No amount of chest-thumping around the globe will change it. In any case, sooner or later we’ll exhaust our military and bankrupt ourselves trying to project our influence into these places overseas — meaning, sooner or later we will withdraw back into our own hemisphere. I wonder if Wolf Blitzer of CNN will ask any of the candidates, what happens then?

Do any of the candidates for president recognize how this works, or have any idea how much disorder this phase change will send thundering through our sociopolitical infrastructure?
With the election campaign revving up so prematurely, it is very possible that all the candidates now in the arena will exhaust, bankrupt, and even disgrace their campaigns as they desperately pirouette around these painful truths, and that none of them will survive the process with their political legitimacy intact. In the meantime, unsettling events on the outside will intrude on the protective bubble in which the public has taken shelter — more bloody disturbances around the Middle East, dangerous shenanigans in the financial markets, untoward weather events in vulnerable places.

The premature election campaign, with all its reassuring televised ceremonies of pre-cooked debate and formal posturing, may end up having the opposite of its intended effect. It may expose the more frightening reality that our political system is not up to the challenges before us. And then what will we do?

Needless to say, these elite fucks whom we want to believe are our “public servants” are really only serving themselves opportunistically at our expense. Using their power, influence and inside knowledge (behind closed doors) to buffer themselves from the coming changes. As the entropy increases so will the stratification and distancing
from the common people by these “Law Makers”.
I’m reminded, (and I can’t find it now but if I do I will post it) that back when John Ashcroft was told not to fly, there was also memo’s sent out, i.e. warnings pre and post 911 to the top fortune 500 companies and their swindlers, of coming events that were not made public to the common folk;for our their safety of course.
YOU MEAN NOTHING TO THEM.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 6 2007 23:05 utc | 28

back in march i linked to a disturbing article on the crazy kenyan internal security minister john michuki’s shoot-to-kill orders for anyone found possessing an unregistered gun — “An illegal weapon in the hands of a criminal has no other purpose than to kill an innocent person. It is therefore justifiable for the law enforcers to take equal measure against such person” — which immediately resulted in several police executions of thieves, a story that never seemed to get much attention outside of kenya, perhaps b/c u.s. officials & contractors have been working closely w/ the kenyan police & civil govt over the years. today i see that michuki’s still taking the fight to the baddies (and those in the way).
Kenya: We Will Wipe Them Out, Warns Michuki

The killings in Mathare came a day after Internal Security minister John Michuki implied that security agents would shoot any suspected Mungiki adherents.
The minister had said in his Kangema constituency, Murang’a District: “We will straighten them and wipe them out. I cannot tell you where those who have been arrested in connection with the recent killings are. What you will be hearing is there will be a burial tomorrow.”
And he added: “If you use a gun to kill you are also required to be executed.”
He spoke after police rounded up more than 400 Mungiki suspects following the beheading of a matatu driver and conductor on Friday morning.
In his Madaraka Day address on Friday, President Kibaki ordered security chiefs to deal ruthlessly with killer gangs.
The President spoke just hours after the killing of two chiefs in Central Province.

“the killings” refered to in the first paragraph is this
Kenya: Twenty Two Shot Dead in Crackdown On Criminal Gang

Twenty two people were shot dead in a sting night-long operation by the paramilitary General Service Unit officers at Nairobi’s Mathare Valley slums on Monday night.
According to official police reports 21 people were gunned down after “hours of shoot out between the law enforcers and violent gangs in the area.”
It excludes two policemen who had been shot dead by a lone gunman earlier, prompting the operation which started at around 9 pm to 8 am yesterday.
But residents claimed 25 people had been killed adding that most of the people shot dead were flushed out of their houses by the police.
The operation was concentrated at Mlango Kubwa and Kosovo sections of the extensive slum and involved more than 100 police officers.
Mlango Kubwa is a well known stronghold for members of the outlawed Mungiki sect. Other residents, who were killed were caught up in the operation as they returned back to their homes in the night.
Police spokesman Eric Kiraithe said it was unfortunate that some residents had died in the crackdown adding that not all victims were members of the criminal gang.
He said: “It’s very unfortunate they all had to die but its because they defied a police operation.”
“They attempted to violently obstruct investigations into the murder of two policemen who were also robbed of their firearms.”
Asked how the residents blocked the operation, Mr Kiraithe said: “Some were in groups and fired at police officers. Also anybody who thinks he can stop police from enforcing the law by using pangas is in for a big surprise.”
Police also announced recovery of three pistols and 17 rounds of ammunition, snuff tobacco and machetes after more than 10 hours of operation.

a hundred cops involved in a crackdown/shootout that kills 22-25 people, and all they recover is three pistols, 17 rounds of ammo, & some pangas.
according to accounts by the resident’s, it was very rough night

Tension remained high in Mathare slums yesterday in the aftermath of the shooting to death of two policemen by suspected Mungiki members on Monday night.
Scores of residents have fled from their homes amid claims that they were harassed during a night-long operation mounted by police and General Service Unit officers in the area, following the shooting of the policemen.

During Monday night’s operation by the police, scores of residents accused some police officers of “excessive brutality and engaging in a looting spree” by stealing mobile phones, cash, watches and other valuables.
Girls and women who sought anonymity, also claimed that they were raped during the operation. [link]

..some residents say the area was peaceful until two police officers were killed on [Monday] night.
They however say they have been living in fear after leaflets were circulated in the area by Mungiki. According to the leaflets, the[y] wanted 200 human heads from a particular community living in the area.
Residents also say the outlawed group had managed to control thefts and muggings in the area to the extent that people could walk freely in the dead of the night.
However, life has not been the same since the officers were gunned down. At midnight on Monday, a large contingent descended on the slum, clobbering everyone in sight. For the next two hours, those who delayed in opening their doors were beaten senseless as the police demanded they surrender the guns they had.
“I know there are some people who could no wake up to go to work after the beatings. Those who could not open immediately will tell you that they went through,” one of the residents said. [“Slum Dwellers Wary After Harrowing Night“, the Nation, June 06, 2007]

again, the police report they recovered three guns.
wtf?

Posted by: b real | Jun 7 2007 4:11 utc | 29

editorial from kenya’s the nation to go w/ the above
Kenya: Brain, Not Brawn, Will Win War On Mungiki

It is not clear how the security operation was mounted or its command structure. It is also not clear whether the law-keepers were following specific leads in their hunt for the killers. But this was a mission in which the majority of victims may ultimately turn out to have been collateral damage – innocent Kenyans caught in the crossfire between a bunch of murderers and a contingent of officers on a revenge mission.
What is patently clear is that there was a breakdown of law and order on Monday night, whose ramifications are bound to be far-reaching and salutary.

From the reports, those officers who invaded Mathare slums ostensibly in pursuit of murderers behaved in a most abominable manner and ended up just antagonising the denizens of the slum, and most possibly, recruiting more members for the sect.
However, it is possible the security forces got their cue from the minister in charge of Internal Security.
Mr John Michuki is reported to have warned the Mungiki of dire consequences should they continue with their grisly executions of officers and provincial administrators. A minister in his position has every right to warn that an outfit like Mungiki will be wiped out, as he did. But in a chilling message, the minister is reported as implying that those already arrested may be buried tomorrow.
That was not tough language he was using; that was a death sentence he was passing, which probably explains why the security forces behaved in the manner they did.
We have one message for Mr Michuki and those who like him, believe that the Mungiki will be wiped out through the force of bullets. Only cunning, superior intelligence and pre-emption can do the trick. That is what should be preoccupying the minds of the think-tank in his ministry right now.

Posted by: b real | Jun 7 2007 4:22 utc | 30

Jim Lobe (on his new blog!) refers to this bill kristol screed on poor little scooters'”go directly to jail” draw — as a matter of bill kristol slapping george bush with his glove.

I FEEL TERRIBLE for Scooter Libby’s family. Millions of Americans feel terrible for Scooter Libby’s family. But we can’t do anything about the injustice that has been done. Nor can we do anything to avert a further injustice looming on the horizon–Judge Reggie Walton seems inclined not to let Libby remain free pending appeal.
Unlike the rest of us, however, George W. Bush is president. Article II, Section Two of the Constitution gives him the pardon power. George W. Bush can do something to begin to make up for the injustice a prosecutor appointed by his own administration brought down on Scooter Libby. And he can do something to avert the further injustice of a prison term.
Will Bush pardon Libby? Apparently not–even if it means a man who worked closely with him and sought tirelessly to do what was right for the country goes to prison. Bush spokeswoman Dana Perino, noting that the appeals process was underway, said, “Given that and in keeping with what we have said in the past, the president has not intervened so far in any other criminal matter and he is going to decline to do so now.”
So much for loyalty, or decency, or courage. For President Bush, loyalty is apparently a one-way street; decency is something he’s for as long as he doesn’t have to take any
risks in its behalf; and courage–well, that’s nowhere to be seen. Many of us used to respect President Bush. Can one respect him still?

I just had to post this, partly because of the LOL hypocrisy of kristal, and I just can’t get the image of bill kristol with that prissy sneer of his, slapping bush with a white glove.
Lobe also alludes to the fact that this is a language bush might respond to (like he does for cheney) who must go through boxes and boxes of white gloves.

Posted by: anna missed | Jun 7 2007 5:10 utc | 31

This one breaks the immunity deal: Disbar and indict , convict.
She was obeying “God’s laws” @ expense of man’s. …or so she thought…and in the process, she broke both. Burn her!

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 7 2007 5:12 utc | 32

Rights Groups Call for End to Secret Detentions

Six human rights groups on Wednesday released a list of 39 people they believe have been secretly imprisoned by the United States and whose whereabouts are unknown, calling on the Bush administration to abandon such detentions.
The list, compiled from news media reports, interviews and government documents, includes terrorism suspects and those thought to have ties to militant groups. In some suspects’ cases, officials acknowledge that they were at one time in United States custody. In others, the rights groups say, there is other evidence, sometimes sketchy, that they had at least once been in American hands.

Posted by: b | Jun 7 2007 5:47 utc | 33

Can one respect him still?
anna missed 31, this ragging of bush by the pundits is by design, calculated imho. they are setting themselves apart to prepare for a contrast in the next election to save the gop. i predict we are going to be hearing a lot more of this.

Posted by: annie | Jun 7 2007 6:47 utc | 34

No doubt annie, didn’t see it, but the talking heads all had the vapors over how critical of bush the debating debutantes were last night. Trouble is (for them) this gentrified glove slapping says as much about the slapper as the slapped. That it’s all just an inside elitist parlor game.
What I’m not sure of is Lobe’s assertion that bush might be inclined to change behavior because of such criticism (from kristol), or whether it will just make him more obstinate.

Posted by: anna missed | Jun 7 2007 8:00 utc | 35

Every once in a while there is a post on dkos rec list that is truly outstanding in it’s knowledge, history and research… this is one of them.
Found: Rove’s Playbook for Attorney Scandal

On March 17, 1972, Malek submitted to Haldeman a document entitled, “Increasng the Responsiveness of the Executive Branch.” (Malek Ex. 4) The document, which was initially drafted by William Horton and designated “Extremely Sensitive—Confidential,” constituted Malek’s broad-view conception as to how the federal bureaucracy could be put to work for the President’s re-election. His plan subsequently received Haldeman’s approval.” [SWR, p. 329]

Of course, it will never make the left side of the page, Why is that?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 7 2007 8:17 utc | 36

Official: Cheney Urged Wiretaps

Vice President Cheney told Justice Department officials that he disagreed with their objections to a secret surveillance program during a high-level White House meeting in March 2004, a former senior Justice official told senators yesterday.
The meeting came one day before White House officials tried to get approval for the same program from then-Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, who lay recovering from surgery in a hospital, according to former deputy attorney general James B. Comey.
Comey’s disclosures, made in response to written questions from the Senate Judiciary Committee, indicate that Cheney and his aides were more closely involved than previously known in a fierce internal battle over the legality of the warrantless surveillance program.

Comey said that Cheney’s office later blocked the promotion of a senior Justice Department lawyer, Patrick Philbin, because of his role in raising concerns about the surveillance.

Posted by: b | Jun 7 2007 8:20 utc | 37

From the Dept of Hey, Look Over There! That Putin’s a Bad Guy:
£30m a quarter in kickbacks for Bandar Bush, sanctioned by the British govt and the Bliar-in-Chief hisself.

Posted by: Dismal Science | Jun 7 2007 9:53 utc | 38

with regards to b’s #37:
“Scientia Est Potentia”
Bingo!
and as another commenter says, “The real question of the century: Why would the Democrats hesitate to move against Cheney, unless his first move was to turn his wonderful spying machine against members of Congress and the Senate? Do you think there is any chance that this is what so horrified John Ashcroft?”

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 7 2007 14:55 utc | 39

john pilger on democracynow for the entire hour thursday (on a book tour)
“Resisting the Empire”: Documentary Filmmaker John Pilger on Struggles for Freedom in Israel-Palestine, Diego Garcia, Latin America and South Africa
also see pilger book review

John Pilger is one of the foremost journalists today who, in the current vernacular, ‘walks the walk’. He has been to most of the world’s hotspots, and whether or not the standard media has considered them ‘hot’, has revealed much of the truth behind the cynical and disguised if not hidden rhetoric of politicians, businessmen, and, discouragingly, former freedom fighters. In Freedom Next Time, Pilger explores five countries, exposing the contradictions between the actions viewed by the people of the land and the words of rationalization supplied by the politicians.
Pilger starts very directly and succinctly, stating with his very opening line, “This book is about empire, its facades and the enduring struggle of people for their freedom.” He examines two empires working in unison, the American, globally powerful after a quick post war ascendancy, accompanied with a heavy dose of remnant British Imperialism, the two combining in all areas to some degree or other. The introduction discusses the changes of viewpoint created within the media, the dichotomy of ‘ours’ and ‘the other’, formed in part by the spin of what is reported as newsworthy and what is ignored. The current American government’s political devices are reminiscent of approaching fascism, especially as one considers George Bush’s considerable powers with his ‘presidential signing statements’ most recently used with “The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive,” giving him virtual unitary power over all facets of government in an emergency (signed May 9, 2007). The current liberalism cloaks a renewed pride in empire, the rhetoric of bringing freedom, democracy, and capitalist free-market structures to the world (mostly the latter).

Posted by: b real | Jun 7 2007 16:21 utc | 40

Fighting for their rights and for Iraq’s future:
Oil strikers met by Iraqi troops

On the third day of an oil strike in southern Iraq, the Iraqi military has surrounded oil workers and the prime minister has issued arrest warrants for the union leaders, sparking an outcry from supporters and international unions.
“This will not stop us because we are defending people’s rights,” said Hassan Jumaa Awad, president of IFOU. As of Wednesday morning, when United Press International spoke to Awad via mobile phone in Basra at the site of one of the strikes, no arrests had been made, “but regardless, the arrest warrant is still active.”
(snip)
The demands include union entry to negotiations over the oil law they fear will allow foreign oil companies too much access to Iraq’s oil, as well as a variety of improved working conditions.
(snip)

Posted by: Alamet | Jun 7 2007 17:27 utc | 41

@b real #40
Wow, how much does part of the Pilger book review sound exactly like what has been happening recently in Lebanon??? From the link to the book review that you posted above:

With his directions clearly stated and outlined, Pilger starts with the mostly unheard of Chagossians. More than three decades ago, the British and the Americans conspired, colluded, to give the American forces the island of Diego Garcia for a major military base. Formerly a tropical paradise, free of tropical storms, a sustainable economy and lifestyle, it had, more importantly a large protected natural harbour and plenty of room to build a major airbase. Through trickery, conniving, and back-room political manoeuvring that kept it out of sight of Parliament, Congress, and the media, the people within the Chagos Archipelago where Diego Garcia is located, were forcefully expelled, tricked into leaving, and refused the right of return (that has a familiar ring to it). Pilger fills in many of the details of “La lutte” (“struggle” in French) calling it a “crime that allows us to glimpse how great power works behind its respectable, democratic façade and helps us to understand how much of the world is run for the benefit of the powerful, and how governments justify their actions with lies.” …
Used as a prime military base, its location in the centre of the Indian Ocean gives it paramount strategic importance to the United States for controlling, or attempting to control, the strategic resources of the Middle East. Unfortunately, it is entirely an illegal occupation.

And there is even a “right of return:”

The Chagossians have persisted with their court actions, succeeding in receiving the right to return in 2000, and just recently (May 23, 2007), after many trips to court because of various appeals, had that right upheld. What remains to be seen is whether there will be still more appeals (which from the obvious illegality of the initial action should probably just be thrown out) and how those rights will be “interpreted” and acted upon. If patterns of the past are any indication (Guantanamo comes to mind), the American military is there to stay.

Posted by: Bea | Jun 7 2007 18:52 utc | 42

the extreme police crackdowns/killings in the nairobi slum district mathare are continuing (see #29, 30)
Kenya: Eleven Killed in Mungiki Crackdown

Police shot and killed at least eleven people today in Mathare in the third day of a crackdown against members of the outlawed Mungiki sect. More than 200 people were arrested in the crackdown.
The eleven were killed as the GSU police unit carried out a day-long crackdown on the sect members. A Nation Reporter at the scene counted nine bodies that lay in pools of blood.
The crackdown came two days after two police officers were ambushed and killed by suspected Mungiki adherents.
Speaking to reporters at the scene, the Kasarani OCPD Paul Ruto confirmed that eleven people had been killed and 200 others arrested.
Recovered from the scene were four guns, two whose serial numbers matched those reported to have been stolen from two policemen killed on Monday night.

another rpt puts the number of dead today at 15
Police slay 15 more in Mathare slums

NAIROBI, June 7 – At least 15 people have been killed on Thursday afternoon in a massive mop-up operation in Mathare slum as police officers searched for Mungiki adherents.
Officer in Charge of Operations in Nairobi Julius Ndegwa is leading hundreds of armed police officers conducting a door-to-door search in the slum, which police claim to be a major hub of the murderous Mungiki gang.
Our reporter witnessed youths rounded up, while women and children lay down in groups of between 100 and 200, under police guard, as other officers searched their houses.
Several houses were demolished while others went up in flames.
Kasarani Divisional Police Boss Paul Ruto said they had recovered five firearms so far, including some guns stolen from officers who were killed by Mungiki members on Monday night.
An estimated 1,000 police officers were said to be on site.

some current photos on the first couple of screens

Posted by: b real | Jun 7 2007 19:09 utc | 43

@Alamet – 40
Maliki is either dumb or under serious U.S. pressure. If the union-oil workers have to quit, they know exactly where to hit to stop all oil flow in the south.
That oil flow is currently the only income source for Maliki’s government. Why threaten them with arrest and the military?

Posted by: b | Jun 7 2007 19:29 utc | 44

A good piece on Iran by right-winger Peter (brother of Christopher) Hitchens: Past the Paranoia

It concerns me now as I write about a recent visit to Iran, the country that has been designated as the next official enemy of what is still called “The West.” I came away so completely opposed to this silly hostility that I fear I am in danger of stirring up apathy, like the people who spread the myth of the cardboard Panzers. I am a Cold War veteran who believes in deterrence and accepts that there was a genuine Soviet threat. I am an incorrigible Zionist. I think my own country has allowed its armed forces to become lamentably weak. But I think the difference between the official account of Iran as sinister menace and the Iran I experienced is so great that it is a sort of duty to draw attention to it.

Recommended!

Posted by: b | Jun 7 2007 20:13 utc | 45

Thanks for the link, b @ 45.
I was in Iran many years ago – summer of 1975 – female traveling on her own. Tehran and Persepolis. And shortly thereafter teacher to many Iranian students in the US. Such a waste that this fake enmity should be sold to Americans.

Posted by: Hamburger | Jun 7 2007 21:09 utc | 46

Bernhard @ 44,
Why threaten them with arrest and the military?
Because the union is outspokenly opposed to the occupation’s darling Oil Law. From their statement back in December:

We strongly reject the privatization of our oil wealth, as well as production sharing agreements, and there is no room for discussing this matter. This is the demand of the Iraqi street, and the privatization of oil is a red line that may not be crossed.

(However, I just noticed that the Karl Marx Was Right blog refers to the union as a “puppet”, and says it was established after the US invasion of Iraq and the dissolution of Iraq’s larger union. I never came across any report to that effect, but KMWR is a blog I think very highly of, so best to keep that possibility in mind.)
And, everyone, Badger is back.

Posted by: Alamet | Jun 7 2007 23:28 utc | 47

In Iraq’s four-year looting frenzy, the allies have become the vandals

British and American collusion in the pillaging of Iraq’s heritage is a scandal that will outlive any passing conflict

Posted by: Alamet | Jun 8 2007 0:27 utc | 48

the new war czar sd ” iraq has a full agenda at the moment”, what intellectual giants, what master of military strategy
they get dumber by the hour

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 8 2007 0:34 utc | 49

AFRICOM’s got a website now. nothing much to see yet, just the same ole’ humanitarian rhetoric that whitefella “philanthropists” like king leopold were lauded for in the late 17th century.
did catch this deceptive headline in a DoS release on the navy’s new “floating school” soon to teach modernity to the govts in the gulf of guinea.
U.S. Navy Plans Six-Month West African Training Mission

The U.S. Navy plans this autumn to begin a half-year patrol of West Africa as a follow-up to a regional conference in November 2006, in which Gulf of Guinea nations called for greater maritime security cooperation.
Under the new plan, a U.S. ship will act as a floating headquarters and training base. It will cruise the region for five or six months, conducting numerous port visits, deploying training teams and allowing international visitors on board, said Admiral Harry Ulrich, chief of U.S. naval forces for Europe and Africa.
The ship will carry between 200 and 300 personnel – exact numbers will change over time as experts and specialized teams come and go, Ulrich told reporters May 31 after describing the plan to West African diplomats and military officers in Washington.
The ship’s personnel will focus mainly on training and working closely with Gulf of Guinea nations.

The Navy’s training teams in West Africa will focus on four main themes:
• Training maritime professionals, such as navy and coast guard crews;
• Improving maritime infrastructure, such as protecting harbors, ships and oil platforms;
• Enhancing maritime “domain awareness,” which concerns being able to monitor and identify illegal or hostile sea traffic; and
• Strengthening maritime interdiction capability, such as being able to stop illegal traffic, as well as being able to conduct search-and-rescue operations or to to help mariners in distress.

and, get this.

Retired Ambassador Peter Chaveas, director the African Center for Strategic Studies in Washington, a Defense Department initiative, said West African officials appear to support the idea of increased U.S. Navy training emphasis. But African nations also are concerned that the concept will not be long-lasting.
“Africans show a great deal of skepticism. We have to … make the case that we’re with them for the long term,” he said.
Ulrich said he intends to follow up the six-month Gulf of Guinea mission with a year-round presence.

brings to mind the ole’ seal of the governor and company of massachusetts bay, 1629

Posted by: b real | Jun 8 2007 4:03 utc | 50

re b’s post #44 on oil workers strike. Maliki’s attitude is prob. do what we tell you, or fuck you we’ll bust yr. union & bring in the pakistani slaves. Same thing they’ve been doing here at home for 2 decades, substitution latins for pakistanis. Probably work as well as firing the entire army, which freed them up to become full time partisans.

Posted by: jj | Jun 8 2007 4:13 utc | 51

duh.. late 19th century, dude. get your head out of those books & onto a pillow.

Posted by: b real | Jun 8 2007 4:21 utc | 52

America the Beautiful.
…or what would Jesus Jack Bauer do?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 8 2007 6:15 utc | 53

The growing security apparatus of the US State – wire-tapping, torture, arbitrary arrest, secret detention, identity checks (papers, no fly lists, etc.), banking laws, intimidation, Gitmo, and all the rest, are,
1) not really the work of Bush as a person or personality, but of the ‘elites’ – corporations etc., thus not uniquely or directly the State, which explains their haphazard nature;
2) an attempt to draw a line between these ‘elites’, their servants and hangers on, and the rest of the people, which is why it is never clear who exactly is being targeted and why – rock singers, demonstrators, embezzlers, white terrorists, poor blacks, liberuls, etc. etc. Slowly, the two camps are being set up while most people are unaware.
3) an attempt to set up control, to deal with problems before they arise, before some explosions take place. There are indeed big changes coming up, but I think the process will be very slow.

Posted by: Noirette | Jun 8 2007 8:22 utc | 54

Krugman (liberated version) Lies, Sighs and Politics

In Tuesday’s Republican presidential debate, Mitt Romney completely misrepresented how we ended up in Iraq. Later, Mike Huckabee mistakenly claimed that it was Ronald Reagan’s birthday.
Guess which remark The Washington Post identified as the “gaffe of the night”?
Folks, this is serious. If early campaign reporting is any guide, the bad media habits that helped install the worst president ever in the White House haven’t changed a bit.

Posted by: b | Jun 8 2007 8:38 utc | 55

Jonathan Steele on Afghanistan: The west has to accept that there is no military solution

Making a priority of “force protection” – which means that soldiers on patrol or in convoy treat every Afghan as a potential enemy and fire on anything suspicious – has helped the Taliban to gain recruits. Before 9/11 the connection between the Taliban and al-Qaida was only at the leadership level, and tenuous at best. Now it is pervasive and at the grassroots. Young Afghans are strapping on suicide belts, a technique imported from Iraq – it was never used against the Soviet occupiers two decades ago, and shocks older Afghans as a perversion of their warrior nation’s traditions. But it helps to make Isaf and US special forces even more jittery, feeding into the instinct to over-react.
Last autumn, British commanders tried to break out of excessive reliance on military force. They made a potentially precedent-setting deal with tribal leaders in the town of Musa Qala by agreeing to withdraw provided the Taliban did not move in. The deal was sabotaged by the Americans and, as on many earlier occasions, Tony Blair failed to stand up to the White House. He let the Musa Qala experiment fizzle out.
In Kabul, some western analysts with long experience of Afghanistan are in despair. They argue that Isaf should recognise the trap it is in. Western governments and their electorates will never provide enough troops to secure the south, but the reckless use of air-power to make up for the shortage of ground troops only loses more hearts and minds. The downward spiral of anger and alienation accelerates.
The only honest solution is to accept that the south is a lost cause as far as western military action is concerned. Isaf should refocus its effort and the available foreign aid money on Kabul and the north. Turn them into an example of how development and modernisation can be done gradually and sensitively and with a real long-term commitment, rather than spending millions on advice on “good governance” from overpaid consultants on short-term contracts.

Posted by: b | Jun 8 2007 8:43 utc | 56

re Noirette’s post. The key test to see if it’s Elite policy to create a neo-feudal police state, or the police state component is the expendable flourish of the au courant transient sadists, is to see if JackAss Party plans to laugh off the GWOT. Soros & John Edwards have both urged this. Soros was shipped back to Europe last month to start a European CFR to facilitate the World State of by & for the Predators under cover of “global warming”; Edwards was trashed by others at recent JackAss Party Debate, which tells us that Police State is here to stay, w/minor modifications. They’ll prob. shut it’s Globe Theater, Guantanamo, in favor of a better concealed gulag in more distant lands & do a bit of fine-tuning, but they’re fascists as well….

Posted by: jj | Jun 8 2007 8:47 utc | 57

There’s not much “new news” (at least for those who have followed the story over the last two years), but
this story from the Guardian
chronicles what could well be an important change in “official” European Community thought and praxis with regard to CIA rendition flights and invisible prisons. Spelling out the abuses in an official document, albeit too late to prevent them,
may at least lay the groundwork for institutional opposition in the near future. That proposition is at best doubtful, but one can hope that the Marty report resonates in the halls of European chancelleries and parliaments.

“What was previously just a set of allegations is now proven: large numbers of people have been abducted from various locations across the world and transferred to countries where they have been persecuted and where it is known that torture is common practice.”

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jun 8 2007 9:19 utc | 58

McClatchy’s Joe Galloway: Bush mantra: Be afraid, be very afraid

The Democrats in Congress wring their hands, gnash their teeth and wail that there was nothing they could do but cave in and vote to continue funding the war in Iraq. After all, that crafty George W. Bush had maneuvered them into a corner and they didn’t have the votes to override his veto.
Horse manure.

Enough is enough. We have lived for more than six years in fear of our neighbors, fear of a world turned hostile by the words and actions of our own leaders, fear of a future that once was a bright and shining dream.
What we must do is give up fear for the 600-odd days that remain in this president’s lease on the White House. As those old bumper stickers declared: NO FEAR! We can be, we must be, alert, on guard and observant because there are evildoers in this world. We need not be foolhardy – but we must be clear-eyed and clear-headed and determined that never again will we be manipulated by a crew of cynical politicians who know only how to hate, not how to love.
No fear!

Posted by: b | Jun 8 2007 9:34 utc | 59

The Guardian’s excellent David Leigh has gone ballistic on Goldsmith’s arse this morning, this is looking beginning to sound like a Brit version of Watergate.
True to his class, Goldsmith denies it all.

Posted by: Dismal Science | Jun 8 2007 11:43 utc | 60

David Leigh’s original article on the corruption that is Goldsmith from the front page of today’s Guardian (June 8, 2007).
Plus the Guardian’s BAe feature in full.
Attorney-general Lord Goldsmith, the Brit answer to Abu Gonzales.

Posted by: Dismal Science | Jun 8 2007 11:49 utc | 61

Re. Uncle’s ‘America the Beautiful’ at 53.
KSM’s two sons and his wife Karima were raided and held by the Pakistanis long before KSM was caught. It was information extracted from the family that led to the capture of Ramzi Binalshib. (And information from Binalshib that led to the capture of KSM) according to TIME-asia. link
Other reports have the family captured at the same time as KSM, but when that might have been is anybody’s guess. Paul Thompson’s timeline lays out the various conflicting stories and dates. Perhaps KSM was killed. link or see here: link
KSM’s sister has filed a petition in Pakistan. IRNA
Omar Saeed Sheikh is appealing his conviction in the Pearl murder on the strength of KSM’s confession.
The today Gitmo KSM is probably not the ‘original’ KSM. The detainee speaks absolutely lousy, non colloquial English and bursts into Arabic occasionally. Personal Rep. and Translator assist him.
Ex, just the first stretch of talk.: Other things are which is very old even nobody can bring any witnesses for that as you written here if it will be ah a value for you for the witness nearby you. This computer not for me. Is for Haws. himself….so me and him both arrested day. Same way. So this computer is from him long time. (Meaning: that isn’t my computer!) BBC transcript PDF
KSM attended Chowan College (beginning 1982 or 3), then transferred to North Carolina State Tech and took a degree in mechanical engineering (1986). He has worked, amongst others, for an electronics firm, for the Qatari Gvmt, as a project engineer (Min. of water and electricity), and as an importer and exporter of plywood (from wiki.) He was a sophisticated international traveller (!) fluent in Arabic, English, Urdu and Baluchi (from Indian papers) and looked grand in a white tuxedo (gossip columns.) He is described as highly intelligent, efficient, an even tempered manager, liked by all. Indeed, the early pictures show both intelligence and conviviality.
I think? the Times has it right about the sons as far as the beginning of the story goes. It is ‘known’ the sons were not in Gitmo, although there were several children there. I think it is really uncertain, doubtful, that they were ‘flown to the US.’ But who knows?
The KSM identity is a composite, contrary to say M. Atta, who is just one and the same person.

Posted by: Noirette | Jun 8 2007 13:02 utc | 62

response to jj at 57,
it is all very murky. On the one hand, a police state keeps the peace and solves many problems; it is also expensive and cumbersome; on the other, when the things go west entirely, an Iraq or Palestine ‘model’ is good – let the ppl kill each other. (Say.)
So that is another hesitation, contradiction. What will prevail I suppose nobody knows and those on the top don’t care, or need, to sort it out. Global warming, or climate change, as the new mantra suits everyone, as it distracts from other issues, provides a scary foil, doomerism to latch onto, insuperable problems, etc. etc.

Posted by: Noirette | Jun 8 2007 13:22 utc | 63

Friday news dump – Pace just got the kick in the ass: Mullen Tabbed to Head Chiefs of Staff

Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced Friday he has decided against recommending Marine Gen. Peter Pace to President Bush for a new term as chairman of the military Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Pace told reporters at the Pentagon that, instead, he is recommending Adm. Mike Mullen, currently chief of naval operations, to take Pace’s job.
Gates said he decided not to recommend Pace’s renomination for another term because confirmation hearings on that would focus more on the past than the future.

I’m not aware that Pace would have had much problem in Congress …

Posted by: b | Jun 8 2007 17:54 utc | 64

speaking of problems in congress, nigerian noble laureate wole soyinka had the deck stacked against him thursday afternoon in the house affairs committee subcommittee on african and global health’s hearing titled “nigeria at a crossroads: elections, legitimacy, and a way forward,” set up to address the issue of how the u.s. should act toward nigeria given the grossly flawed national elections last april.
soyinka was the only nigerian witness. the others were the asst secretary for african affairs jendayi frazer and the presidents of the international republican institute (IRI) and the national democratic institute (NDI), which are “democracy assistance” partners in u.s. efforts to manipulate foreign govts through elections etc.
soyinka clearly stated in his testimony that “[i]t is asking too much of the Nigerian people, who have undergone years of brutal and arbitrary rule to accept, without reservation, this latest assault on their sovereignty under a democratic guise.” since the whole election was a farce, it much cancelled, the electoral commission (which worked closely w/ the “democracy assistance” folks) needs to be dissolved, and a truly independent body must be created to set up new elections. to not do so it sure to lead to widescale chaos, quite possibly a new civil war.

When a grave injustice has been perpetrated – in this case, when unelected governors, senators, assemblymen, local councilors – some of them known gangsters, extortionists and killers on police record – when such elements are imposed on a people, the points of explosion are multiplied, and uncoordinated. I am speaking here of a wildfire effect, each fire feeding off the other from distances, and fuelled by differing sources of combustion, then merging into a major conflagration.

soyinka continues,

The international community must play its role by treating all those implicated in this treasonable conduct – the highest treason being the subversion of a people’s sovereignty – as international pariahs, no matter how high the regard in which they were once held on the international circuit. Of all the forms of corruption that afflict a community, political corruption is the most lethal, since those who violate the sacred mandate of political choice lose regard for human lives and hold the people in contempt. Such vectors of political corruption must be taught that there is a price to pay for the abuse of power and the subversion of political system. Nearly a hundred lives were lost over the Nigerian electoral exercise, needlessly and avoidably. Responsibility for that crime must be assigned, and punishment becomes a responsibility that belongs to all who value democracy and advocate the dignity of peoples as manifested both in the right to choose their leaders painlessly and in peaceful conditions.

unfortunately, as i said, the deck was stacked against soyinka & nigerians.
frazer testified that, instead, discounting the election and setting up an interim govt would fuel conditions for a coup, and the u.s. would work w/ the new govt b/c

…the stakes are too great to walk away from Nigeria. And in our judgment, the best way to nurture Nigeria’s fragile democracy is for the United States to engage with them on the very issues at risk: political reform, regional security, and economic opportunity.
Nigeria remains vitally important to U.S. security, democracy, trade, and energy policy needs and objectives. Its government remains one of our most dependable allies on the continent on a wide array of diplomatic initiatives from such as Darfur, peacekeeping, counter-terrorism, and HIV/AIDS. As an up and coming emerging market of 140 million people, Nigeria welcomes U.S. investment and technology and is one of the world’s largest importers of U.S. wheat. Nigeria accounts for twelve percent of U.S. oil imports and as of March, it passed Saudi Arabia and Venezuela to become the third largest exporter of crude oil to the United States.

she then goes on to talk a bunch of nonsense.
the IRI guy worries about the image problem they’re faced w/ as the make their “way forward”/moveon

As a result, Nigeria, a key strategic partner of the United States, will be run by a man who came to power by questionable means. While the United States must work with President Yar’Adua, we must not repeat the mistakes of 1999 and 2003. The message that Nigeria received following those elections was that the appearance of elections would be enough to satisfy international observers and foreign governments. But, the Nigerian people, and the world, will expect more from the Nigerian government in the elections of 2011. While the public response to April’s travesty has been relatively muted, two failed elections in a row may give rise to greater public hostility in a country that is already a tinderbox poised to blow over ethnic, religious, or economic conflict.

and the NDI guy opines that

Many voices are calling for cancellation and re-run of the elections, but simply organizing new elections within the current electoral framework would likely produce a similar, flawed outcome.

and goes on to outline a few recommendations for the new (not really) nigerian govt to address reform.
it’s obvious that the elections will always be flawed so long as foreign meddlers are allowed more input into the process than the actual people that live & vote there.
but, as frazer said, the u.s. position is that “the stakes are too great to walk away from Nigeria.”

Posted by: b real | Jun 8 2007 19:40 utc | 65

the cretin gives a press conference in gdansk with the family of public imbeciles they call a government, in poland. if you went to the worst , the most pretentious elocution school, you could not end up baying & barking as bush does
the 20th century has awarded us many leaders of astounding stupidity but bush is really in a league of his own with bokassa perhaps or baba doc duvalier, howard in australia & marcos in the phillipines, truman perhaps also – but really what a bedlam
what carnage – characters such as these – claw out in our ô so cultivated world

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 8 2007 19:55 utc | 66

& i laugh like luanda when i hear the media speak of three ringed circuses as if it is not of the whole bent ballet

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 8 2007 20:20 utc | 67

@rememberinggiap
You make frequent references to Marcos. After Marcos was deposed, power returned to the Hacienderos, and the Oligarchy continues. Just curious to know if you have any insight into Philippine politics, pre-Marcos, the Marcos era, and ever since Marcos.

Posted by: DM | Jun 8 2007 22:10 utc | 68

[comment deleted b.]

Posted by: slothrop | Jun 8 2007 22:10 utc | 69

freaky, man.

Posted by: slothrop | Jun 8 2007 22:12 utc | 70

Thanks for nothing slotrop, breaking up the page.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jun 8 2007 22:26 utc | 71

dm
yes i understand a little of the phillipines sad history including the recent collaboration with the americans in extrajudicial murder. i have passed through her a number of times & i always found her a distinctly sad nation

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 8 2007 22:30 utc | 72

the transcripts don’t really do justice to the hearing i mentioned in #65 above. wole soyinka actually got a lot of time to eloquently speak to (better yet, instruct) the members. if anyone’s interested, the webcast video for the entire hearing is avail here, though i’d skip the first 1hr 7 minutes, which consists of the first panel, being only frazer (who takes up quite a bit of space), reading poorly from her written testimony, etc…
though soyinka steals the show, so to speak, unfortunately the premises that much of the discussion was based on provided a good indication that little will come from all this. no mention was made of the $15 million that USAID put into a nigerian “election and political processes support program”; instead members phrased their questions along the lines of “should the u.s. get involved in another country’s elections?” puh-leez! and, other than soyinka, in the end, nobody objected to recognizing the new president as a legitimate leader.

Posted by: b real | Jun 8 2007 22:37 utc | 73

almost by accident a good interview with lula on aljazeera with that old fool, david frost.
he is saying things that are diametrically opposed to those that are often repeated in the murdocian media. that is he is fundamentally & principally opposed to bush & says clearly – that there is no healing to be done in latin america while bush remains. he also speaks of chavez as a brother – as someone he trusts absolutely like a brother – even with their divergences
lula speaks slowly & awkwardly – but reminds frost that america led the tide of murder against chile, against honduras, against nicaragua, against uruguay, against argentina & against brazil & it will take some time before there is a healing between the americas
he is lucid despite the senility of frost

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 9 2007 0:21 utc | 74

I have been thinking a great deal of nietzsche since my beloved France seems determined to transform itself into bavaria
I have been thinking how much the darkness of our epoch should lead us to the works of nietzsche & of cioran but i maladroitment find myself moving further into marx rather than away from him
I have enormous respect for nietzsche, not so for cioran except perhaps as a stylist but in nietzche i find as i have always found in althusser – the terrible weight of thinking & of the real risk of thinkiing
& how much in the dark times the talentof a philologist is perhaps wasted when the words that pass so easily from the lips of the state’s thinker – whether they are fukuyama or finkelkraut ars o vulgarly wrought & which do not require close reading
the paradox of this is the self elected elite thinkers like strauss schmiit or even karl popper & perhaps a george steiner have wreaked such havoc on words & their meaning that they no longer possess the sacred power as they did when nietzsche wrote
who can ever forget their first reading of old friederich – for me it was at 16 – perhaps at the time of my most maximalist positions where i wrote essays in defence of stalin provocatively but still with a trusting heart – for the organisation i belonged to – niezsche hit me like a perfect storm of reality & conscience. It was twilight of the idols & i think beyond good & evil. I remember it troubled me so much that i sought mild anxiety drug from a doctor comrade. It troubled me deeply because if marxism is what i wanted to believe it is nietzsche who i actually lived
i think i have done battle with that old devil since then
i was never troubled with the charlatan heidegger whom i read only a little later & reread in the 1990’s. for me he was like james joyce – an inevitable conclusion of a series of steps. The western mind & its paralysis & its fascination with that paralysis
nietzsche struck me like malcolm lowry – with the interrogation – how the fuck did a person write that ? – they are essentially surprises – they invite such abyss into thinking that they necessarily disorder it & for good reasons
i was struck too by its beauty – by its incredible beauty & i was struck by how close his thinking is to breathing in the way that great jazz is also very close to a heightened form of listening & breathing
& i think it is that, that in the dark times – when all you want is sleep, yes the sleep of reason – that it is essential to to risk in your listening & breathing
to admit the terrible times we are living in. & they are terrible times. A time of such crudity & violence that seems to destroy naturally any notion of beauty but i am reminded of the art of another poster, anna missed – that were posted here – the ‘ghost rodeo’ – that are at once ‘beautiful’ & ‘truthful
that are at once consolation & an impetus to engage
& i am thinking that that is the role nietzsche has played in my life as a sacred text of consolation but also as a means of rethinking & reworking what engagement is
i am sure that is why i post here at moon – it is something even 10 years ago that i would have thought inimaginable – & i have lived a public life all my life but there is something in the nature of what we do here which is revealing in a way ‘performing’ is not
& there is something in what both nietzsche & vladimir maiakoskïi are said to have done – in turin one day nietzsche this man without pity held the head of a horse that had fallen on the ice in his arms & wept, mayakovskï wrote a poem about his experience which is the same – he holds the horses head in his arms & weeps – it is a simple but extraordinary poem about humanity & wonder, pity & perhaps the necessary violence to change terrible situations
& perhaps that is what i try to do when i post to hold the horses head in my arms

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 9 2007 1:17 utc | 75

From the German Press Agency (dpa), via the tiny Backnanger Kreiszeitung in south Germany, via the excellent Andreas Hauss: US agents tested G8 security by “smuggling explosives”.

NEWS TICKER
Americans tested G8 security by “smuggling explosives”.
07.06.2007 10:36
Rostock (dpa)
According to information provided to dpa [Deutsche Presse-Agentur], US security forces tested security at the G8 Summit in Heiligendamm by transporting a small amount of explosive material.
Dpa reports that the plastic explosives were hidden in a suitcase, and were discovered by German officers when they stopped a car at a checkpoint. Although only a “very small amount” of material was involved, the alarm was raised following an X-ray [examination of the suitcase]. The persons in the car, who were dressed in civilian clothing, then disclosed their identity as US security agents.

The perfect alibi. Never to be questioned.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 9 2007 1:43 utc | 77

rgiap,
If you ever need help in holding a horse’s head, let me know. I’ll will help.
Although we have never met, I consider you a good friend.
As always,
Rick

Posted by: Rick | Jun 9 2007 2:06 utc | 78

rick
i think of you as a good friend & i think that is precisely the point – we do meet here – with an intimacy that is perplexing at times

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 9 2007 2:29 utc | 79

Chavez Accuses U.S. of a “Soft Coup” Attempt in Venezuela

Caracas, June 7, 2007 (venezuelanalysis.com)— Chavez accused the Venezuelan opposition and the U.S. of planning a “soft coup with a slow fuse,” using the same method that has been applied in various eastern European countries in the past few years.
Chavez made the accusation during a press conference with representatives from the international media yesterday.

Chavez was referring to the recent students protests as protests that copied the model of demonstrations that helped topple governments in Serbia, Ukraine, and Lithuania recently. Chavez explained that, according to the French journalist Thierry Meyssan, the mastermind behind this model, is the director of the Albert Einstein Institution, founded by Gene Sharp.
This institution advocates the use of non-violence to destabilize government, using the sectors of society that are easiest to manipulate. In Venezuela, though, this strategy would fail, said Chavez, because it can only work with governments that are unpopular.

that thierry meyssan article, from jan 2005
Soft and Undercover Coups d’État: The Albert Einstein Institution: non-violence according to the CIA
Non violence as a political action technique can be used for anything. During the 1980s, NATO drew its attention on its possible use to organize the Resistance in Europe after the invasion of the Red Army. It’s been 15 years since CIA began using it to overthrow inflexible governments without provoking international outrage, and its ideological façade is philosopher Gene Sharp’s Albert Einstein Institution. Red Voltaire reveals its amazing activity, from Lithuania to Serbia, Venezuela and Ukraine.

Posted by: b real | Jun 9 2007 4:09 utc | 80

Oiling the wheels of war: smuggling becomes the real economy of Iraq

The Ashur smuggle oil. For years under Saddam Hussein, they worked as mere guards at Abu Flus terminal at the mouth of the Gulf. But as the state collapsed after the US and British invasion in 2003 and economic anarchy set in, they took over the port and became the quasi-official authority there. Never have the family’s fortunes flourished as in the last three years. They built their own underground oil tanks in their farms, where fuel tankers empty their cargoes to be pumped later into small pontoons. A cousin of the family estimates that they make about $5m (£2.5m) a week from smuggling oil.
When another tribe tried to take over the ports, the family hired gunmen from outside Basra to defend its fiefdom. “We were paying $250,000 every week for gunmen just to make sure that we keep our terminals and preserve our rights,” said the cousin, Abu Harith.

To insulate their fortune, the clan uses the protection of Fadhila, the ruling party in Basra, which for more than a year ran the oil ministry in Baghdad. But it also takes care to have good relations with the rival Mahdi army.
Abu Harith described a typical operation: “I took a cleric with me, he was one of Moqtada’s [al-Sadr, head of the Mahdi army] people, we ran into a police checkpoint, he rolled down the window and told the policeman ‘we are on duty, from this car to the last car behind the tankers.’ And that was it. We emptied the fuel into private underground tanks for the Ashur family.

Posted by: b | Jun 9 2007 9:36 utc | 81

No news, (but with my # 77 in mind)just a little colour in context of the mayor’s refusal to open up his city to joint military exercises. All these years later, the silence about this in the US still astonishes me.
Recent Michael Meiring reference from the Philippines

Duterte on Balikatan: ‘Basta ayaw ko’
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
AFTER years of explaining why he refuses to let Davao City host the joint military exercises between Filipino and American soldiers, now City Mayor Rodrigo R. Duterte apparently no longer wants to explain why.
“Basta ayaw ko! (I don’t like it and that’s it),” he told reporters when asked why despite alleged intercession by a Cabinet member to allow the Balikatan exercises to be held in Davao, he still doesn’t want to have them here.
Under no circumstance during his term would he allow the Visiting Forces Agreement to take place in the city, he said, whether or not the insurgency movement in the Davao Region continues to fester as it has done through four decades.
The mayor asserted that the problem of armed struggle by communist rebels will be resolved by the Filipino soldiers and not by foreigners.
It was earlier reported that Duterte has not given in to the pressure of Malacanang for the city of Davao to host the annual joint military exercise. It was said a Cabinet member phoned the mayor to seek his approval on the holding of the exercise, a request the mayor turned down.
While the mayor has not been so chummy with the US since he became mayor, this relationship has since turned to disdain since the bomb blast inside Evergreen Hotel on May 16, 2002 in the room of an American citizen, Michael Terrence Meiring. The bomb was believed set up by Meiring himself.
But instead of allowing the interrogation of Meiring for possible terrorist activity and the issuance of a warrant of arrest against him by the court, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) whisked him out of the country while he was confined in a hospital for his injuries, without the consent of the city, the local police, and the court.
Duterte said that incident was a sheer form of disrespect for the sovereignty of the Filipino people and the laws that abound its territory. And that is something that the city mayor will never forget.
Since the explosion and Meiring’s flight, officials of the US who have been asked about the bomb suspect has vowed to pursue the case, but nothing has been said ever since about Meiring, and no one has prosecuted him.

Also, a Keyword: Evergreen.
Evergreen Airlines is a CIA owned business. And not coincidentally, the former cargo-handler at JFK Airport who is now locked up for the alleged plot, worked for Evergreen.
I’m just saying…
Oh, and one last thing, what is the FBI doing in the Philippines?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 9 2007 11:27 utc | 82

In response (tangentially) to Rgiap on France…You all know I suppose that Kouchner (nominally a socialist), ze French Doktor, has been nominated Minister of Foreign Affairs, possibly the most important post after Sarkozy the First himself.
The expat French right wingers around here are very pleased: it shows openness, non party politics, nominating the most competent, Kouchner is a fabulous MAN, experienced, what a loss for the Socialist party (snicker snicker) – it is true he often gets a high rank in the ‘most pop French public figures’ – but he has never been elected to anything. (footnote missing.) When I ask Why not the Ministry of Health? the answer is, oh the specific Ministry itself does not matter, you only need the right people: which made me realize that the French have no expression equivalent to moral compass. !
Diana Johnstone, a historian I respect, has written a profile; for Counter Punch:
Sarko and the Ghosts of May 1968
link
The links I provide are often trivial (eg. wht rlly hppned wrt KSM abv) but this informs about the future.

Posted by: Noirette | Jun 9 2007 12:37 utc | 83

Muslim graveyard vandalized

Dozens of Jewish worshippers desecrated a Muslim cemetery in a Palestinian village near Arial on Friday.
The worshippers broke some tombstones, and wrote “Death to Arabs” on others. Noaf, a resident of a nearby village, said that the worshippers arrived at the cemetery escorted by soldiers.

Posted by: b | Jun 9 2007 13:38 utc | 84

Rgiap: “I have been thinking a great deal of nietzsche since my beloved France seems determined to transform itself into Bavaria”
I worry you will soon prefer Bavaria the way things seem to be headed. To expand on rgaip’s and Noirette’s posts, what follows are somewhat related links that I have come across in the last day or two.
For one thing, and very similar to the U.S. popular political experiences with Bush, often people need to be more careful what they wish for. And of course, sometimes the price of fulfilling one’s wishes is very high indeed.
There is a stark difference of information in Noirette’s link (post #83) of Diane Johnstone’s account of Kouchner than what is found in the BBC article of May 18nth. As usual, Noirette’s insight is very valuable.
Not totally unrelated, yesterday I read that all persons in Dubai, will be iris-scanned for identification.
I worry some here may take offence for me using these words from Jacques Cheminade, but I share such worries of what may come to pass in France:

The labeling and political surveillance of French citizens, by the multiplication of surveillance cameras, the integration of the STIC (local police) and JUDEX (national police) files, the extension of DNA labeling (which is actually contemplated for the case of two kids who are less than 12 years old), the use of biometric passports and the detection of “high risk” children. A man who, in this situation, believes in genetic determinism is a danger to public liberties.

Just as with the Patriot Act here in the States, there is reason for much worry about what the future holds for all of us.

Posted by: Rick | Jun 9 2007 14:47 utc | 85

Adding to b real’s 80:
Otpor in Serbia carried out the first spectacularly successful soft coup, ‘inspired’ by Gene Sharp’s wisdom and, incidentally, funded by all the usual you-know-whos. Upon finding the Serbian people less than grateful about subsequent developments and revelations, the leaders of Otpor have gone international and are now in the revolution exporting business. (They put the color in the Colored Revolutions.) They are kindly offering their expertise for free at Canvas.
The wiki article identifies Sumate as Otpor’s client in Venezuela.

Posted by: Alamet | Jun 9 2007 15:23 utc | 86

from the gay science:

In media vita [In mid-life].- No, life has not disappointed me! On the contrary, I find it truer, more desirable and mysterious every year,-ever since the day when the great liberator came to me, the idea that life could be an experiment of the seeker for knowledge-and not a duty, not a calamity, not a trickery!- And knowledge itself: let it be something else for others, for example, a bed to rest on, or the way to such a bed, or a diversion, or a form of leisure,-for me it is a world of dangers and victories in which heroic feelings, too, find places to dance and play. “Life as a means to knowledge”-with this principle in one’s heart one can live not only boldly but even gaily and laugh gaily, too! And who knows how to laugh anyway and live well if he does not first know a good deal about war and victory?

it’s the bit about domination as a virtue that is troublesome in nietzsche.

Posted by: slothrop | Jun 9 2007 16:32 utc | 87

alamet
it’s too bad otpor was/is funded and trained by the cia.
so many contradictions.

Posted by: slothrop | Jun 9 2007 16:34 utc | 88

should have read breal’s link before commentin g. sorry. recently saw OTPOR: THE FIGHT TO SAVE SERBIA (2001). really interesting doc available on the intertubes.

Posted by: slothrop | Jun 9 2007 16:49 utc | 89

Also, a Keyword: Evergreen.
Perfect: Ever.Green.
Get it?
Forever flush with dollar bills…

Posted by: Bea | Jun 9 2007 18:33 utc | 90

When will the USA move from a Decidership to a Democracy of the people? (of, by and for)

Posted by: pb | Jun 9 2007 19:15 utc | 91

Gee, Evergreen’s HQ is just down the road from me, in McMinnville, a smallish town in the wine country southwest of Portland. Alongside their mega-global transport, service, and logistics operations, they grow their own grapes and hazelnuts. Awww….
And right next to the vineyards, you can visit da Spruce Goose and ooh and ah over a hangar full of assorted death-machines.

Posted by: catlady | Jun 9 2007 21:16 utc | 92

From debka.com
Produced by the Israel Armament Development Authority Rafael as a defensive system, See-Shoot uses sensors, aerial drones and surveillance aircraft to feed data to fortified command centers which transmit them to towers from which weapons automatically open fire on approaching targets.
I only hope Laura Ingraham doesn’t read about this and get any ideas for the U.S. borders!

Posted by: Rick | Jun 9 2007 21:53 utc | 93

an interesting story this week is that of the blackwater suing its own assassins or the family of assassins otherwise known as contractors
they are suing them to shut them up about what happened in fallujah in 2004
really, they are neither the modern army or the samuraï they imagine themselves to be but small-time hoods guilty of the common acts of theft, rape & murder
the pillage, the spoilation, the sack of iraq is the work of barbarians
barbarians who are the assault armies of evil incarnate that emanates from the corridors of washington

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jun 10 2007 1:07 utc | 94

More on DeFreitas as being “trained” at Evergreen for those interested.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 10 2007 1:56 utc | 95

Small-time hoods. Succinctly said.

Posted by: DM | Jun 10 2007 3:22 utc | 96

Uncle, who was it that owns an airport catering company? Was it Neil Bush …
the JFK story has me thinking about how convenient it would be to have a company that services airliners, say if you wanted to bring things on and off the plane without having to bother with all that security and red tape.

Posted by: jonku | Jun 10 2007 3:44 utc | 97

blackwater: human excrement or matter contaminated with human excrement discharged from a toilet
truth-in-advertising

Posted by: b real | Jun 10 2007 4:02 utc | 98

Who’s Pulling the Strings? Behind Venezuela’s “Student Rebellion”

That the “student leaders” are tied to the opposition is far from controversial: for example, spokesperson Yon Goicochea is a member of Primero Justicia and the aptly-named Stalin González belonged until recently to the strangest of opposition organizations, Bandera Roja. BR is a nominally Marxist-Leninist group which made the unlikely transition from a respectable guerrilla organization to the attack dogs of the far right, claiming to use the opposition as a vehicle to topple the fake communism of Chávez and institute a true dictatorship of the proletariat. But González recently revealed the extent of his opportunism by joining Rosales and Un Nuevo Tiempo.
But the contours of the opposition’s hands-off strategy wouldn’t be fully clear until the revelation of a taped phone conversation in which Un Nuevo Tiempo leader Alfonso Marquina spoke of the need to remain in the background, but to pull the strings regardless: “Let’s mobilize all the kids We have a strategy as an organization Let’s mobilize all the kids, because you know [UCV student leader] Stalin [González] is our vice president here in Caracas Let’s mobilize the kids from the Catholic [University] We’ve decided that the politicians won’t intervene, that we’ll leave it to the kids in their natural environment. We’ll give them support, stick them in trucks If I go out there, they’ll say it’s the politicians that are calling the kids out”
“The only thing that can save us in this situation is if something extraordinary happens,” replies Elías, an advisor to RCTV head Marcel Granier, on the leaked tape. It’s comments like this that lead the Vice President of the National Assembly Desiree Santos to argue that the political opposition to Chávez was “looking for a death” among the students, to “repeat the actions of 2002” in which pre-meditated deaths were inserted into a pre-fabricated media strategy to overthrow Chávez.
Santos continues: “We want to denounce today a campaign which intends to convince the country that these student protests are spontaneous, civil, peaceful, and democratic, but behind them there lies an entire conspiratorial apparatus. They are using these kids as cannon fodder…” It was little surprise, then, that when a student was indeed killed (but under circumstances unrelated to the protests), the opposition press immediately ran with the story, only later rectifying their erroneous reports that she had been shot by police. This convenient misreporting even led to the story reaching the pages of Spain’s El País.

Posted by: b real | Jun 10 2007 4:20 utc | 99

R’giap, isn’t that a counter-suit. Families of the 4 burned & strung up on the bridge are suing them. They want all the loot that comes from being a “private co.” (they pay ~$250-350/day & bill govt. ~$950/day) w/the lack of liability that the govt. gets. That magnitude of profit is terrifying. They’ll be buying governments soon. And they’re refusing to give Congressional Committees any documents on their operations. Now that Cofer Black is Head of their “Intelligence Division”, and w/their kind of pay huge numbers of CIA guys are guaranteed to follow, how long before they’re buying & threatening Congress, etc., etc. I heard brief interview w/Jeremy Scahill after he’d been on book tour for awhile. He said a lot of guys had come up to him after his speeches saying” it’s much worse than you know”.

Posted by: jj | Jun 10 2007 4:20 utc | 100