Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 19, 2007
Weekend OT

If you don’t comment …

Comments

Quite a biased Guardian article.
Putin riles west by barring opposition protesters

Police detained Garry Kasparov – the former world chess champion and a vocal critic of Vladimir Putin – as he tried to board a flight from Moscow to the southern city of Samara.
Mr Kasparov was due to lead a demonstration by a coalition of anti-Kremlin groups, The Other Russia. They were protesting on the margins of yesterday’s summit, hosted by Mr Putin, and attended by Angela Merkel and other EU leaders. …

Then this quite revealing issue about international journalists traveling with Kasparov.

Police instead detained Mr Kasparov and Eduard Limonov, another opposition leader, for five hours until the last Samara-bound plane had gone.
They also refused to allow western journalists who booked tickets through Mr Kasparov’s United Civil Front movement to get on the Aeroflot plane, including the correspondents of the Daily Telegraph and the Wall Street Journal and a Dutch TV crew. The Guardian, which had booked separately, was allowed to fly. The plane took off 50 minutes late, without Mr Kasparov, and with 50 empty seats.

Mr Kasparov and his supporters were left marooned next to the airport’s Irish pub.

Who finances Kasparov’s movement and who paid for the journalists ticket booked “through his movement?
Also marooned at the Irish airport pub doesn’t sound like much of a detention to me …

Posted by: b | May 19 2007 6:47 utc | 1

A little fun reading for the weekend anyone?
A very entertaining and, whew, good read: Leary, Liddy and Thompson

Snip:
Late terrestrial species architecture, mostly silica fusion and
inorganic slab construction, erected by the musculotoic legions of the
late Twentieth Century industrial feudal dynasties.” From his pocket
he extracts “a packet of aromatic hydrocarbon sticks,” bringing one to
his lips and lighting it, drawing in the smoke deeply, obviously
savoring the tingle nicotine is sending through his bloodstream.
Timothy Leary has arrived in Boulder, Colorado.
Snip:
Obviously, I retain a special affection for Uncle Tim. If any of these
men could legitimately be called complex, it is probably Leary. A
brilliant scientist, he was often reviled by traditional scientists,
whom he called “arrogant motherfuckers who deny their role in the
military industrial complex’s manipulation of the American people.”
Leary rejected what hecalled the “grim Newtonian mechanics of
objective fact” for the “free flowing quantum physics approach to
consciousness” that the changing, not the static, governs
consciousness and the outcome of the world.”Understanding this even
intuitively,” he said, makes people unmanageable by agents of the
criminal government syndicate that runs and ruins America.”That sort
of talk was why Nixon called him “the most dangerous man in America.”
Snip:
In retrospect, I would have liked to have stirred more discussion of
personal freedom and authoritarianism between Liddy and Leary who,
after all, personified the giant struggle between the authoritarian
state and sixties-style self-realization. How did these philosophical
and ideological enemies accommodate their ultra-serious differences?
We often hear, historically, about enemies able to call a temporary
truce, which of course gives us valuable insight into the nature of
warfare. What are the mechanics of such a truce, however brief? Here
were two modern men, a microcosmic example in the persons of Liddy and
Leary. But this wasn’t Truman against Stalin or Caesar against Pompey.
They were simply ambitious men who overshot their expectations and
found themselves to be serving as symbolic gladiators over an
immensely important issue in the media coliseum, but there only for
the amusement, revulsion and/or adulation of the throng. And their
success or failure depended upon the persona they created and
sustained.
Snip:
“Computers are going to replace hieroglyphics text as communication.
Computers will be THE drug of the future… Then we’ll have computer
addiction and computer abuse,”
Snip:
I had no idea that Leary’s comments on the cult of authority’s war on
individual freedom and the future importance of computers was the
closest thing to political prophesy I’d ever hear. I stopped under a
streetlight and jotted down their words merely because they sounded
cool. By next morning however, there was an epiphany afoot. There was
that electro-metallic tang of truth stinging the mind, the kind that
only someone who has taken lots of LSD toward good purpose can
perceive.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 19 2007 7:15 utc | 2

In reference to b’s lead comment on the crackdown in Russia, Merkel hardly has the right to criticize Putin for controlling demonstrations. Her fear of “no global” protesters has lead to the construction of a 17 million dollar fence around the resort town of Heiligendamm called The White town by the sea
getting into bed with bush and sarkozy has removed any semblance of moral high ground she could have ever thought to have.
also,
Germany now joins the coalition of the willing in a sad but not unexpected way. German troops die in Afghanistan

Posted by: dan of steele | May 19 2007 8:25 utc | 3

Prime Minister Tony Blair has made a surprise visit to the Iraqi capital Baghdad.
Mr Blair is due to have talks with President Jalal Talabani and Prime Minister Nouri Maliki.
He flew into Baghdad’s Green Zone hours after it came under rocket attack – though officials said there was no indication the PM was the target.
It is Mr Blair’s seventh visit to Iraq and is expected to be his last before he steps down from office next month.
‘Usual business’

Of the rocket attack, Mr Blair’s spokesman said: “We are not pretending this isn’t an occurrence that happens on a fairly regular basis.
“We have no information to suggest anything other than the usual business.”

Just goes to show the farce of the Iraq adventure. China, Russia and the EU (to a lesser extent) must delight in seeing the USA bleed itself dry in Iraq.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | May 19 2007 9:27 utc | 4

Americans Want a Competitive Third Party

Many adults in the United States would like to have more choices in politics, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 58 per cent of respondents think it would be good for the U.S. if there were a truly competitive third party.

The number would probably have been a lot higher if the poll had asked how many Americans think it would be good for their country if there were a truly competitive second party.

Posted by: Monolycus | May 19 2007 9:42 utc | 5

John Bolton and the leftist extremist BBC-Interviwer Jon Humphreys:
When Humphrey talks silly stuff about Iraq not beeing a safer place today, Bolton outpaces him with his sophisticated rhetorical skills. What a diplomat!
Radio Interview

Posted by: snutrat | May 19 2007 11:10 utc | 6

Blair no doubt follows on the heels of Cheney, who followed on the heels of Rice… all no doubt trying to exert whatsoever pressure they can to get the damned oil law signed before all these brewing scandals implode on their heads… methinks it will be a cold day in hell before that law is ever signed. The Iraqis are on to it and they aren’t buying. Ho ho ho.

Posted by: Bea | May 19 2007 14:48 utc | 7

Captain America Rules!
I really dug the Captain as a kid collecting comics, to bad it was all propaganda;I really wanted to believe.
Oh, and dig that David Holmes back-up track to this, DH does some impressive minimalist freestyle jazz trip hop worthy of movie soundtracks.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 19 2007 16:39 utc | 8

Nothing for sure beyond smoke and mirrors but this sure rings a credibility bell for me:
from Xymhora: Dicksplanation?May 19, 2007
Saturday, May 19, 2007

It is interesting how the right-wing corporate media is now treating the DC Madam story. After attempting to have ABC News put a lid on the story, the Cheney revelations have caused the media barons to relegate the matter to the gossip sector. However, this tactic is not working. As anyone familiar with national security knows,
snip…
Cheney’s reported dalliances during his time at Halliburton and his radical personality change call for a full national security investigation. If a foreign power or foreign interests had access to Cheney’s phone records from the 1990s – and many foreign intelligence agencies would have been interested in communications in the neighborhood of the CIA where Cheney lived – there is a distinct possibility that blackmail is behind Cheney’s push for the war in Iraq.
snip…
The American Establishment relied on Cheney to be the adult supervision for the inexperienced and stupid Bush, as they knew Cheney from years of reliable service to their interests, and they had watched the idiot Bush grow up and knew he wasn’t up to the job. How could they have made such a huge mistake in judgment in picking Cheney to run the country?

Little did they realize that Shotgun Dicky was ultimately as incompetent as the chimp.

Posted by: Juannie | May 19 2007 18:40 utc | 9

venerable $U,
Thanks for the link to Joe’s epistle on Leary et. al.
I first encountered Tim at a Libertarian convention in the mid 70’s when I started listening to his talk with the mind set of “why have they invited this drug soaked idiot to a cerebral occasion such as this”. By the end of his talk I gleaned that he was far more credibly cerebral than anyone I had ever met. After digesting his writings I attended a workshop of his in early 80’s in northern CA. The personal contact reinforced and extended my opinion of this so called drug soaked hippy.
I haven’t read the link to the Joe it’s entirety yet but will. It’s too delicious not to. Again thanks for the heads up.

Posted by: Juannie | May 19 2007 19:06 utc | 10

“58 per cent of respondents think it would be good for the U.S. if there were a truly competitive third party.”
About 100,000,000 would probably like a truly *co-operative* party but we don’t dare talk about that do we?

Posted by: pb | May 19 2007 20:59 utc | 11

What is this, recruitment or a round up???
Iraq’s interior ministry calls on former staff to return to service

The Iraqi interior ministry will call on all staff from security agencies during the time of the former regime to appear at the ministry’s institutions and police stations, “otherwise they will be dealt with in accordance with the terrorism law,” an official source said.
“The decision to bring back the old security staff includes those who worked in intelligence, public security and special services, except those who have reached the age of retirement,” Maj. General Abdul-Kareem Khalaf, the interior ministry’s national command center chief, told the independent news agency Voices of Iraq (VOI).

The interior ministry official affirmed that those “who fail to report to the security organizations in the country, during the mentioned period of time, will be considered involved in acts of hostility against the Iraqi people.”

Posted by: Alamet | May 19 2007 22:30 utc | 12

Gangs of Iraq

Desperate to shore up its flagging ranks, the military is quietly enlisting thousands of active gang members and shipping them to Iraq. Will a brutal murder finally wake up the Pentagon?

Unfortunately, it is only an excerpt.

Posted by: Alamet | May 19 2007 22:34 utc | 13

All spectrum incompetence …

The secret Iraq documents my 8-year-old found
With a couple of keystrokes, you too can read the hidden history of the Coalition Provisional Authority, America’s late, unlamented occupation government in Iraq.
Editor’s note: The document discussed in this story can be viewed here, both with and without its hidden text.
By Pete Moore (Salon)

Posted by: Outraged | May 19 2007 23:48 utc | 14

thanks for getting me read the bageant piece, uncle & juannie
The python has consumed and digested America and shit out what we see around us today. It now unhinges its jaws so as to swallow the world.

Posted by: b real | May 19 2007 23:58 utc | 15

Nigeria: Stop Treating Niger-Delta People Like Animals, 4 American Hostages Tell FG

ELEVEN days in a hideaway in the creek where they are being watched over by armed militants, the four American oil workers who were kidnapped by Niger-Delta Freedom Fighters (Egbema One) say they, totally, understand now, the reason why militants in the Niger-Delta are up in arms against the government, declaring emphatically that that there is no human being with blood flowing in his veins that will not be provoked to carry arms if he is treated like an animal, the way Niger-Deltans are being treated.
The hostages: Mike Roussel (anchor operator), Chris Gay (anchor operator), Larry Plake (anchor operator) and Kevin Faller (barge foreman), all workers of Global Industries, a Lagos-based oil servicing company to the Chevron Nigeria Limited (CNL) spoke to the Saturday Vanguard exclusively in the base camp of the militants, Thursday evening.

Unanimously, they called on the Federal Government to speed up and meet the demands of the militants, which is basically an agreement to the effect that the government and oil companies operating in their areas would provide the natives with basic amenities like road, potable water, electricity and other things to facilitate their release by the freedom fighters.
They were all in good health when this reporter met with them but each one of them wants to go home and re-unite with their families as soon as possible. They also confirmed that the militants were taking care of them under the circumstances
From their mien, the hostages were also confident of the fact that the militants do not mean any harm to them as individuals and that, they were mere tools in the multifaceted and volatile struggle by an underprivileged and subjugated people for recognition and attention by their government.
Chris Gay told Saturday Vanguard: “Their struggle is a genuine struggle for the emancipation of their people. They told us and I have seen it that the reason why they kidnapped us is to draw the attention of the government and the oil companies to their suffering. They want job for the natives; they want government to help them out. Generally, they want development, which is why we are being held”.
On his part, Mike Roussel asserted that “the people are starving; they want schools for their children. That is the most important to them. They want jobs also, they don’t have money. Just look at the water they bath with and drink, which tells you right away that something has to be done.
“I want the Nigerian government to bring us out of here to enable me go home to my family as soon as possible. The government should come in here and try to help these people out and their children. Everybody needs education because without education, you have nothing and here, they don’t have schools”, he said.
Kevin Faller, who quivered, as he spoke said he had learnt many lessons from his stay so far in the creek. In his words: “Yes, I have learnt many things, the nature of how these people are being treated, how they have to live and you see, everyone is a human being and not an animal and these people deserve the good things of life like others too. There is no way they would not be provoked to carry arms and do what they are doing when they are not provided with basic amenities.
“They are very poor and from what I can see, there are no schools, hospitals, no roads and if something happens, it will take a long time to get to the hospital and maybe, the person being rushed to the hospital will die before they get there. It hurts to see human beings live the way these people are living in the Niger-Delta, no one deserves to live like this”, he added.
To the fourth hostage, Larry Plake, “our eyes have been opened to a lot of things we didn’t know about the sufferings of the Niger-Deltans. The militants have showed us a lot of things that we did not know before of their position. Things like how they live, how they are treated and all that, it is not right, I must say.
“They have nothing. And what they have at all is from their own land. Have you not seen their houses, they bring down trees to make their ramshackle buildings, they bath and drink from the same water they pollute. The food they eat here, we cannot eat it.
“I want the government to understand the plight of these people first. Let the eyes of the leaders of Nigeria be opened on the real problems of the Niger-Delta people. It is only when their eyes are really opened that they can tackle it. A human being does not have to live the way these people are living in the creek. They should have schools, hospitals, houses to live, not these ramshackle huts they live in, not things they have to build like what we have seen. There should be electricity and spring water. In fact, so many things are missing here”, he asserted.

Nigeria: Shell Resumes 170,000bpd Production in Niger Delta

Royal Dutch Shell yesterday resumed operations in the Niger Delta to restore 170,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil production after a protest at its major pipeline hub.
According to Shell’s spokesman, the company has regained access to its Ogoni site, after the six-day protest in the Ogoni area of the Niger Delta, which had raised the tally of oil supply cut by violence to about 900,000 bpd, or one third of total capacity in the country. Nigeria is the world’s eighth largest exporter. The crisis in the Niger Delta had led to world oil price increase.
The Dutch oil giant had halted oil production in the Ogoni area 14 years ago as a result of popular protests, which were a precursor to today’s violent insurgency in the Niger Delta.
… Villagers from K-Dere community had staged a protest to demand a stake in the oil flowing through their land, but vacated the site on Wednesday after their elders promised to settle the issue in talks with Shell over the next few days.
Meanwhile, US major Chevron also disclosed yesterday that only about 7,000 bpd of its Escravos oil production was still closed after a community invasion at its Abiteye facility on May 7, causing a disruption on its 70,000 bpd production prior to its original estimate of 42,000 bpd.
According to a report, rebels fighting for local control over oil wealth have stepped up attacks to press their demands, but the line between militancy and crime are blurred and frequent kidnappings are mostly motivated by money.
Twelve foreigners are still being held hostage there after a Belarussian woman working as an industry contractor, who was abducted on May 5 in Port Harcourt was released on Wednesday night.

as the first article i linked to supports, the kidnappings are not “mostly motivated by money.” they draw attention to the desperate plight of the residents being shit on by big oil & the nigerian federal govt.
meanwhile, not any surprise, now that a few weeks have passed since the election farce in nigeria & outsiders can move on
Nigeria: US: Nigeria Still Strategic Partner, Despite Election Flaws

The United States of America (USA) views Nigeria as a very important and strategic partner and would continue to work with her in spite of the fact that the recent elections in the country fell short of expectations.
The US government’s position was made known yesterday by the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of African Affairs, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, at a press briefing on the forthcoming Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) taking place in Ghana this month.
“All of you have read the statement of the US government. We were very disappointed at the results of the election and how those elections were carried out. They were a disappointment not only to us, but I think it was an opportunity lost for Nigeria. That said, Nigeria being what Nigeria is remains a very important strategic country to the US and we will continue to have bilateral relations with the Nigerian government.”

AGOA which was signed into law by the US government in 2000 encourages African countries to open their economies as well as build free markets. Thomas-Greenfield disclosed that AGOA had made tremendous progress within the period, saying that about 47 per cent of US imports in 2006 were from Nigeria. The import was mainly made up of crude oil totaling a sum of $25.8 billion for last year.

— — —
Chavez demands Pope apologize for Indian comments

CARACAS (Reuters) – Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez demanded Pope Benedict apologize to Indians in Latin America for saying this month in Brazil that the Roman Catholic Church purified them.
Chavez, who regularly clashes with the Catholic Church in Venezuela but had not directly criticized the Pope before, accused the Pontiff on Friday of ignoring the “holocaust” that followed Christopher Columbus’s 1492 landing in the Americas.
“With all due respect your Holiness, apologize because there was a real genocide here and, if we were to deny it, we would be denying our very selves,” Chavez said at an event on freedom of expression.
In a speech to Latin American and Caribbean bishops at the end of a visit to Venezuela’s neighbor Brazil, the Pope said the Church had not imposed itself on the indigenous peoples of the Americas.
Indian leaders in the region were outraged by the comments.

Posted by: b real | May 20 2007 0:48 utc | 16

b real
really really thanks for this work & following through -with many, many routes to follow
notice today that the coupstarters in venezuela defending ‘their’ televsion & their so called ‘freedom of speech’ – chavez is doing the necessary thing & his people would be better served by public television
read also that blair called the troops work in iraq “brilliant” – christ, only a man as hollow as he could howl that

Posted by: remembereringgiap | May 20 2007 1:00 utc | 17

r’giap –
oilwars blog, which i’ve linked to now & then, generally has good coverage of venezuela & has been on top of the rctv issue for years.
from last sunday, a good illustration of why rctv had to go
If you watch just one video of Marcel Granier….

In most parts of the world the private media is owned by a handful of very rich individuals who then have the privilege of deciding what everyone else gets to read and watch on Television. Venezuela is no exception to this. For example, the Venezuelan media magnate Gustavo Cisneros is a multi-billionaire who is one of the wealthiest people in the world.
Another Venezuelan media magnate is Marcel Granier who is the owner of the soon to be defunct RCTV. It is more than a little ironic that he is only gaining international notoriety just as he is about to become a good deal less relevant inside Venezuela.

In this 15 minute video Marcel Granier speaks before a small group of handpicked journalists to give his accounting of recent Venezuelan history. The video then contrasts this with what actually happened. The video is also very interesting because is gives good footage of some very key events. I highly recommend that everyone watch it in full
[As the video is in Spanish I will give some explanations and commentary at key points referenced by the time on the video]

today’s entry, however, expresses disappointment (overreacts?) w/ the replacement
Chavez gives Venezuelans no reason to celebrate

However, as has been discussed before, even if RCTV sails off into the sunset there is the very real issue of what is to replace it – another private station? Another government controlled station? Or finally a station that allows the airwaves to be used in a truly democratic fashion?
Apparently the discussion has already been had, or perhaps better said, the decision has already been made by Chavez, and unfortunately it is not one that favors freedom of expression and a deepening of the country’s democracy. Rather than a truly independent station that increases the pluralism of ideas on the public domain Venezuela will have one more government controlled television station – gee just what it needed?!?!
The new station, called TEVES, just had its president handpicked by Chavez. In announcing his decision Chavez, with lots of probably unintended irony, said “Let there always be more diversity”. Yeah sure, as if having one person controlling a television network, be that one person Marcel Granier or Hugo Chavez, allows for diversity.
I suppose Venezuelans can take some consolation from the fact that they will no longer have RCTV working to promote violence and overthrow the government. That is, after all, no small thing. Yet the predominant sentiment will probably be sadness that rather than getting a network that will allow Venezuelans, in all their diversity, to be heard they will get one more network run by the rich or powerful.

Posted by: b real | May 20 2007 1:24 utc | 18

speaking of the media, i recommend Media control/ideological hegemony.
thanks for the links b real

Posted by: annie | May 20 2007 1:47 utc | 19

reuters: US navy to fight crime, terror along African coast

DAKAR, May 19 (Reuters) – The United States is boosting its naval presence along the lawless West African coast to combat terrorism, illegal migration and drug trafficking and to secure U.S. oil interests, senior naval and coastguard officials said.
Amid concerns that weak government controls in some West African states has made the region fertile for drug cartels, people smugglers and Islamist groups, the U.S. navy command in Europe has focused its activities southward.
“The clear majority of shipping coming into the United States is coming off the coast of West Africa into the Gulf of Mexico,” Vice-Admiral John Stufflebeem, commander of the U.S. Sixth Fleet based in the Mediterranean, said on Saturday.
“So we are interested in this (region) from a security perspective from our own homeland, and … in commerce and quite frankly, oil is one part of it,” he told Reuters.
The Gulf of Guinea, which includes oil producers like Angola, Equatorial Guinea and Nigeria, is central to U.S. efforts to reduce dependency on Middle Eastern exports.
It currently supplies around 15 percent of U.S. oil consumption, and that is forecast to rise to 25 percent by 2015, although resource-hungry China is also looking to corner oil supply from the region, notably in Angola.

In a joint naval and coastguard initiative, the two vice-admirals were touring six West African countries — Mauritania, Senegal, Benin, Togo, Sao Tome and Gabon — to build maritime cooperation ahead of the year-long trial deployment of a U.S. navy vessel to the region in October.
The amphibious ship, capable of carrying training teams and smaller boats, will act as a mobile base along the coast, in a test of a global naval project dubbed Global Fleet Station to expand the U.S. maritime presence for a reasonably low cost.
The commanders were also encouraging local governments to adopt an electronic tagging system for ships, known as Automatic Identification Systems (AIS), as a cheap means of tracking shipping in their waters aimed at tackling smuggling and piracy.
“When we talk to major corporations like oil companies or insurance companies …, there is a growing concern about the safety and security of their enterprises,” Stufflebeem said, singling out Nigeria, the world’s third worst nation for piracy.

Stufflebeem said the AIS initiative should be complimented with a network of radar stations, such as the $18 million site being built by the U.S. government for Sao Tome.

controlling communication/shipping lines to control oil traffic
and
as in the days of gunboat diplomacy, u.s. businessmen feel more comfortable having the navy in the area
the increased naval presence is not something they’re just now boosting, as documented in my africom report

Posted by: b real | May 20 2007 1:48 utc | 20

He who laughs Last (NSPD 51 – HSPD 20): Bush Anoints Himself as the Insurer of Constitutional Government in Emergency

With scarcely a mention in the mainstream media, President Bush has ordered up a plan for responding to a catastrophic attack.
In a new National Security Presidential Directive, Bush lays out his plans for dealing with a “catastrophic emergency.”Under that plan, he entrusts himself with leading the entire federal government, not just the Executive Branch. And he gives himself the responsibility “for ensuring constitutional government.”
He laid this all out in a document entitled “National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD 51” and “Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20.”
The White House released it on May 9.
Other than a discussion on Daily Kos led off by a posting by Leo Fender, and a pro-forma notice in a couple of mainstream newspapers, this document has gone unremarked upon.
The subject of the document is entitled “National Continuity Policy.”
It defines a “catastrophic emergency” as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government function.”
This could mean another 9/11, or another Katrina, or a major earthquake in California, I imagine, since it says it would include “localized acts of nature, accidents, and technological or attack-related emergencies.”
The document emphasizes the need to ensure “the continued function of our form of government under the Constitution, including the functioning of the three separate branches of government,” it states.
But it says flat out: “The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government.”
The document waves at the need to work closely with the other two branches, saying there will be “a cooperative effort among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Federal Government.” But this effort will be “coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity with respect to the legislative and judicial
branches and with proper respect for the constitutional separation of powers.”
Among the efforts coordinated by the President would ensuring the capability of the three branches of government to “provide for orderly succession” and “appropriate transition of leadership.”
The document designates a National Continuity Coordinator, who would be the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.
Currently holding that post is Frances Fragos Townsend.
She is required to develop a National Continuity Implementation Plan and submit it within 90 days.
As part of that plan, she is not only to devise procedures for the Executive Branch but also give guidance to “state, local, territorial, and tribal governments, and private sector owners and operators of critical infrastructure.”
The secretary of Homeland Security is also directed to develop planning guidance for “private sector critical infrastructure owners and operators,” as well as state, local, territorial, and tribal governments.
The document gives the Vice President a role in implementing the provisions of the contingency plans.
“This directive shall be implanted in a manner that is consistent with, and facilitates effective implementation of, provisions of the Constitution concerning succession to the Presidency or the exercise of its powers, and the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (3 USC 19), with the consultation of the Vice President and, as appropriate, others involved.”
The document also contains “classified Continuity Annexes.”

Also, FROM WHITE HOUSE.GOV:
NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51 & HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20

And while I’m here, as we read the madness of the times with jaw dropping
regularity here’s one more, From Detroit News:
Nuke official’s comments stir security concerns
“I was a hired assassin.”

Feds seek answers after former chief at Palisades plant told magazine he was a hired assassin.
Paul Egan and Gordon Trowbridge / The Detroit News
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
The former Palisades plant security chief’s claims he was an assassin has prompted probes. See full image
Federal nuclear watchdogs and members of Congress are seeking answers after a former security director at a western Michigan nuclear plant gave a bizarre series of interviews to Esquire magazine in which he claimed to be a hired assassin.
William E. Clark, who until recently was security chief at the Palisades nuclear power plant near South Haven on Lake Michigan, told the magazine for an article in its June edition that he had worked as a government assassin, killing people in Vietnam, New Orleans and Iraq.
The article suggested most of Clark’s claims were false and that he was emotionally unstable
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which is responsible for safety and security at the nation’s nuclear plants, has sent questions on the issue to Entergy Corp., the plant’s current owner, according to Viktoria Mitlyng , a spokeswoman for the agency’s regional office in Illinois. Consumers Energy Co. owned Palisades at the time Clark was hired; a third company, Nuclear Management Co., managed the plant for Consumers.
A spokesman for U.S. Rep. Fred Upton, R-St. Joseph, said Entergy has promised to investigate and update him on its findings. Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., has called on NRC officials to investigate; Clark was employed at a Massachusetts plant before moving to Palisades.
Lana Pollack, president of the Michigan Environmental Council, said the article raises serious concerns about how key personnel at U.S. nuclear and chemical facilities — prime targets for potential terrorist attacks — are screened.
“If it were a movie, it would be amusing; in real life, it’s upsetting,” Pollack said Thursday. “The idea that he had full access to the Palisades plant and a fully armed team of guards who answered to him would be a stunning security lapse.”
Mark Savage, a spokesman for the Palisades plant, said Clark took a medical leave on April 17 and resigned for medical reasons on May 9.
Mitlyng would not say specifically what information the NRC was seeking, but said federal rules on security and background checks for sensitive workers had become stricter after the 2001 terrorist attacks.
Arline Datu, a spokeswoman for Nuclear Management, said the firm took security very seriously, and that all employees, including Clark, undergo a strict background check. She said she could not comment on whether any procedures were missed in Clark’s case.

Here’s the Esquire Story

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 20 2007 3:00 utc | 21

Just discovered Michael Franti and the Spearhead today. Dude doesn’t get alot of commercial radio play for some reason.
Lyric to Light up ya Lighter:

Fire, fire, fire, light up ya lighter, fire fire fire
Armageddon is a deadly day, Armageddon is a deadly way
They commin for you everyday, While Senators on holiday
The Army recruiters in the parking lot, Hustling kids there jugglin pot
Listen young man, Listen to my plan , Gonna make you money, gonna make you a man
Bom Bom
Here’s what you get, An M-16 and a Kevlar vest
You might come home with one less leg, But this thing will surely keep a bullet out of your chest
So Come on Come on, Sign up, Come on
This one’s nothing like Vietnam
Except for the bullets, Except for the bombs,
Except for the youth that’s gone
Chorus
So we keep it on, til ya coming home, Higher and Higher
Fire, fire, fire, light up ya lighter, fire fire fire, so we keep it on
Til ya commin home, higher and higher
Fire, fire, fire, light up ya lighter, fire fire fire
Tell me President tell if you will,
How many people does a smart bomb kill
How many of em do you think we got,
The General says we never miss a shot
And we never ever ever keep a body count,
we killin so efficiently we can’t keep count
In the Afghan hills the rebels still fightin,
Opium fields keep providin
The best heroin that money can buy
and nobody knows where Osama bin hidin
The press conferences keep on lyin like we don’t know
Some say engine engine number nine,
Machine guns on a New York transit line
The war for oil is a war for the beast,
the war on terror is a war on peace
Tellin you they’re gonna protect you,
Tellin you that they support the troops
Don’t let them fool you with their milk and honey,
No they only want your money
One step forward and two steps back,
Why do veterans get no respect
PTSD and a broken back,
Take a look at where your moneys gone seen
Take a look at what they spend it on
No excuses, No illusions
Light up ya lighter

Posted by: ran | May 20 2007 6:32 utc | 22

Will there be elections in 2008? Let me put it this way, I would not be surprised if there were none.
Daily Kos: Bush declares control of all 3 gov branches if any crisis.

This has me worried.

National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive
NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51
HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20

Subject: National Continuity Policy
May 9, 2007

Purpose

(1) This directive establishes a comprehensive national policy on the continuity of Federal Government structures and operations and a single National Continuity Coordinator responsible for coordinating the development and implementation of Federal continuity policies. This policy establishes “National Essential Functions,” prescribes continuity requirements for all executive departments and agencies, and provides guidance for State, local, territorial, and tribal governments, and private sector organizations in order to ensure a comprehensive and integrated national continuity program that will enhance the credibility of our national security posture and enable a more rapid and effective response to and recovery from a national emergency.

Basically the jist of below is that to save the Constitution in a time of crisis, Bush just gave himself unconstitutional powers until things have stabilized, and we all know how great Bush is at stabilizing things. Basically, we must burn the village to save it!

Posted by: Fran | May 20 2007 10:13 utc | 23

US surge is failing, says UK’s Iraq envoy

The “troop surge” by American soldiers in Iraq is not working, one of Britain’s senior military officials in Baghdad has said.
In a pessimistic assessment of the strategy designed to pull Iraq back from all-out civil war, Alastair Campbell, the outgoing defence attaché at the British Embassy in Baghdad, claimed that extra US forces were not achieving the desired drop in violence.

In unusually candid comments, Mr Campbell also disclosed that American commanders had decided that the criteria for the “success” of the troop surge would be nothing more than a reduction in violence to the level prior to last year’s al-Qaeda bombing of the al-Askari Mosque in Samarra, which destroyed its golden dome.

While the United States military has made little secret of its view that the bloodshed in Iraq can now only be contained, rather than stamped out altogether, the suggestion that 800 murders a month in the country would be a measure of success is an indication of how far the coalition has been forced to reign in its expectations.

Posted by: b | May 20 2007 12:23 utc | 24

US presidential primary politics is usually painfully boring but this bit from Texan Ron Paul might be of interest to people here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA

Posted by: boxcar mike | May 20 2007 14:00 utc | 25

Fragging or suicide?
Korean officer in Iraq found shot dead.
Report says he was “an officer of the medical administrative affairs team,” so I suppose this could involve illicit drug dispension as a third possibility.

Posted by: Alamet | May 20 2007 15:54 utc | 26

what follows are exerpts from fisk’s war for civilization. the following exposes how tenuous the argument is–and an argunment fisky always wants to make–that america caused the interreligious conflict and cultural catastrophe of iraqi nationalism:

But “liberation” had already turned into occupation. Faced by a crowd of angry Iraqis in Fardus Square demanding a new Iraqi government “for our protection and security and peace,” U.S. Marines, who should have been providing that protec tion, stood shoulder to shoulder facing them, guns at the ready. The reality, which the Americans-and of course, Mr. Rumsfeld-failed to understand, was that under Saddam, the poor and deprived were always the Shia Muslims, the middle classes always the Sunnis just as Saddam himself was a Sunni. So it was the Sunnis who were now suffering plunder at the hands of the Shia. And so the gun battles that broke out between property-owners and looters were, in effect, a conflict between Sunni and Shia Muslims. “By failing to end this violence-by stoking ethnic hatred through their inactivity-the Americans are now provoking a civil war in Baghdad,” I wrote that night in The Independent:
I drove through the city for more than an hour. Hundreds of streets are now barricaded off with breeze blocks, burned cars and tree trunks, watched over by armed men who are ready to kill strangers who threaten their homes or shops … A few Marine patrols did dare to venture into the suburbs yesterday-positioning themselves next to hospitals which had already been looted-but fires burned across the city at dusk for the third consecutive day. The municipality building was blazing away last night and on the horizon other great fires were sending columns of smoke miles high into the air. Too little too late. Yesterday, a group of chemical engineers and water purification workers turned up at the Marine headquarters, pleading for protection so they could return to their jobs. Electrical supply workers came along, too. But Baghdad is already a city at war with itself, at the mercy of gunmen and thieves. . . “You are American!” a woman shouted at me in English. . . “Go back to your country. Get out of here. You are not wanted here. We hated Saddam and now we are hating Bush because he is destroying our city.” It was a mercy she could not visit the Museum of Antiquity to see for herself that the very heritage of her country-as well as her city-has been destroyed.
And so, on 14 April, it was the burning of books. First came the looters, then came the arsonists. It was the final chapter in the sack of Baghdad. The National Library and Archives-a priceless treasure of Ottoman documents including the old royal archives of Iraq-were turned to ashes in 3,ooo degrees of heat. Then the library of Korans at the Ministry of Religious Endowment was set ablaze. I saw the looters. One of them cursed me when I tried to reclaim a book of Islamic law from a boy who could have been no more than ten years old. Amid the ashes of hundreds of years of Iraqi history, I found just one file blowing in the wind outside: pages and pages of handwritten letters between the court of Sherif Hussein of Mecca-who started the Arab revolt against the Turks for Lawrence of Arabiaand the Ottoman rulers of Baghdad.
And the Americans did nothing. …

always in Fisk’s writing this tension between the descriptions of historic shia/sunni animus and the provocation of such conflict by the americans and the demand by fisk the americans do “something” about saddam, about chaos, etc.–this tension between a brutalized people who need liberation and an abstract dignity of “iraqis” time and again betrayed by interreligious hatred, is not resolved by fisky.
finally, this:

Everywhere are the signs of collapse. And everywhere the signs that America’s promises of “freedom” and “democracy” are not to be hon [994] oured … Here’s what Baghdadis are noticing-and what Iraqis are noticing in all the major cities of the country. Take the vast security apparatus with which Saddam surrounded himself, the torture chambers and the huge bureaucracy which was its foundation. President Bush promised that America was campaigning for human rights in Iraq, that the guilty, the war criminals, would be tracked down and brought to trial. Now the 6o secret police headquarters in Baghdad are empty; even the three-square-mile compound headquarters of the Iraqi Intelligence Service. I have been to many of them. But not a single British or American officer has visited the sites to sift through the wealth of documents lying there or talk to the exprisoners who are themselves visiting their former places of torment. Is this through idleness. Or is this wilful?

… Then there’s the fires that have consumed every one of the city’s ministries-save, of course, for the Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Oil-along with UN offices, embassies and shopping malls. I have counted a total of 35 ministries now gutted by fire and the number goes on rising. Take the scene played out on Wednesday. I was driving through Baghdad when I saw a vast column of black smoke staining the horizon. So I headed to see which ministry was left to burn. I found myself at the Ministry of Oil, assiduously guarded by U.S. troops, some of whom were holding clothes over their mouths because of the clouds of smoke swirling down on them from the neighbouring Ministry of Agricultural Irrigation. Hard to believe, isn’t it, that they were unaware that someone was setting fire to the next building?
Then I spotted another fire, just lit, three kilometres away. I drove to the scene to find flames curling out of all the windows of the Ministry of Higher Education’s Department of Computer Science. And right next to it, perched on a wall, was a U.S. Marine, who said he was guarding a neighbouring hospital and didn’t know who had lit the next door fire because “you can’t look everywhere at once.” Now I’m sure the marine was not being facetious or dishonest-should the Americans not believe this story, he was Corporal Ted Nyholm of the 3rd Regiment, 4th Marines and, yes, I called his fianc6e Jessica in the States for him to pass on his love-but something is terribly wrong when American soldiers are ordered to simply watch vast government ministries being burned by mobs and do nothing about it.
Because there is also something very dangerous-and deeply disturbing-about the crowds setting light to the buildings of Baghdad, including the great libraries and state archives. For they are not the looters. The loot ers come first. The arsonists turn up afterwards, often in blue and white single-decker buses. I actually followed one of them after its passengers had set the Ministry of Trade on fire and it sped out of town. Now the official American line on all this is that the looting is revenge-an explanation that is growing very thin-and that the fires are started by “remnants of Saddam’s regime,” the same “criminal elements,” no doubt, who feature in the Marines’ curfew orders to the people of Baghdad.
But people in Baghdad don’t believe Saddam’s former supporters are starting these fires. And neither do I. True, Saddam might have liked Baghdad to end in Gotterdammerung-and might have been tempted to turn it into a city of fire before the Americans entered. But afterwards? The looters make money from their rampages. But the arsonists don’t make money by burning. They have to be paid. The passengers in those buses are clearly being directed to their targets. If Saddam had pre-paid them, they wouldn’t have started the fires. The moment Saddam disappeared, they would have pocketed the money and forgotten the whole project, not wasted their time earning their cash post-payment.
So who are they, this army of arsonists? Again, we don’t know. I recognised one the other day, a middle-aged, unshaven man in a red T-shirtyou can’t change clothes too often when you have no water to wash in-and the second time he saw me he pointed a Kalashnikov rifle at me. Looters don’t carry guns. So what was he frightened of? Who was he working for? In whose interest is it-now, after the American occupation of Baghdad-to destroy the entire physical infrastructure of the state, along with its cultural heritage? Why didn’t the Americans stop this?
As I said, something is going terribly wrong here in Baghdad and something is going on which demands that serious questions be asked of the United States government. Why, for example, did Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld claim last week that there was no widespread looting or destruction in Baghdad? His statement was a lie. But why did he make it? The Americans say they don’t have enough troops to control the fires. This is also untrue. If they don’t, what are the hundreds of troops deployed in the gardens of the old Iran-Iraq war memorial doing all day? Or the hundreds camped in the rose gardens of the Presidential Palace near the Jumhuriya Bridge?
So the people of Baghdad are asking who is behind the destruction of their cultural heritage-their very cultural identity-in the looting of the archaeological treasures from the national museum, the burning of the entire Ottoman, Royal and State archives and the Koranic library and the vast infrastructure of the nation we claim we are going to create for them. Why, they ask, do they still have no electricity and no water? In [998] whose interest is it for Iraq to be deconstructed, divided, burned, dehistoried, destroyed? Why are they issued with orders for a curfew of millions of people by their so-called liberators? … It’s easy for a reporter to predict doom, especially after a brutal war which lacked all international legimitacy. But catastrophe usually waits for optimists in the Middle East, especially for those who are false optimists and invade oil-rich nations with ideological excuses and high-flown moral claims and accusations like weapons of mass destruction which have still been unproved. So I’ll make an awful prediction. That America’s war of “liberation” is over. Iraq’s war of liberation from the Americans is about to begin. In other words, the real and frightening story starts now.

the insinuation here is that the americans sought “cultural destruction” in order to divide & rule.
the truth, based on books like fiasco and emerald city, is the entire “liberation” was managed incompetently.

Posted by: slothrop | May 20 2007 17:38 utc | 27

b real,
Thanks so much for your inputs.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | May 20 2007 20:11 utc | 28

Settler children in Tel Rumeida, Palestine, part 2
(others parts will show up in the list on the right, part 1 seems to be missing?)
YouTube

Posted by: Noirette | May 20 2007 20:18 utc | 29

the insinuation here is that the americans sought “cultural destruction” in order to divide & rule.
the truth, based on books like fiasco and emerald city, is the entire “liberation” was managed incompetently.

How about seaking cultural destruction by sending seamingly incompetent managers?
Now that “truth” may not be fitting for you …

Posted by: b | May 20 2007 20:38 utc | 30

How about seaking cultural destruction by sending seamingly incompetent managers?
if you can support this claim, i’m all ears.

Posted by: slothrop | May 20 2007 20:40 utc | 31

How about seaking cultural destruction by sending seamingly incompetent managers?
those responsible for the mayhem and destruction would have to care for this to be valid. I really don’t think they give a rat’s ass about anything other than quarterly profits and bottom line.
all that artsy cultural crap is for weak kneed lefties, real men kick ass.

Posted by: dan of steele | May 20 2007 20:56 utc | 32

oh sloth, it is just like the election fraud, people say, until you can prove it.. doesn’t mean it didn’t happen because you don’t have ‘proof of intent’. it was entirely serendipitous? the state department advice was ignored? they had a pre trained army come in w/chabali. there were all the contractors that don’t take their orders from the army. there was the enormous ‘loss’ or ‘misplacement’ of guns and amunition. the intense focus on media/message/and dead journalists…then there is history. we equipped each side. get real. it doesn’t mean every person was ‘in on scam’, just enough to direct chaos.

Posted by: annie | May 20 2007 21:11 utc | 33

h/t to latin america news review for these two links
Chavez government to finance Glover film

CARACAS, Venezuela – Venezuela’s Congress says it has approved financing for two films by actor Danny Glover, a close supporter of President Hugo Chavez.
The lawmaking body, which is closely allied with Chavez, said in a statement on its Web site Thursday that it approved $20 million for two Glover productions.
They include “The General in His Labyrinth,” which deals with the life of South American liberator Simon Bolivar. It is based on a novel by Colombian Nobel Prize-winning writer Gabriel Garcia Marquez and will be directed by Venezuela-born director Alberto Arvelo.
The other is “Toussaint,” which the statement said Glover plans to direct documenting the life of Haitian revolution leader Toussaint Louverture.

and, something for slothrop 😉
The Empire is Failing – A Good Thing for America and the World: An Interview with Terry Paupp

Terry Paupp is the author of Exodus from Empire: The Fall of America’s Empire and the Rise of the Global Community. The book examines the downfall of the American Empire, its impact on the world community and what world order will take its place. …
zeese: Your book faces up to a key question that is rarely discussed in the U.S. media — American Empire. I expect many in the media and the public do not think of the U.S. as an empire. Please explain why you call the U.S. an empire?
paupp: You are quite correct in noting that the U.S. media fails to even acknowledge that Americans live in an empire. I call the U.S. an empire because it is clear to any serious student of history that it became one in the aftermath of World War II when England surrendered its colonies and accepted the protection of the U.S. nuclear umbrella from the beginnings of the Cold War.
The entire period of the late 1940s through the early 1960s was an age of de-colonization from the empires of Britain, France, and Germany. Yet, during this period the Cold War provided the context for the U.S. to embark upon neo-colonialism and neo-imperialism in order to protect the so-called “Free World.” The reality is that the Free World is not really “free” in terms of civil liberties and human rights. It is free to open access by U.S.-based corporations and multinational/transnational business interests.
To assist in this structuring of the world economy in line with the American Establishment, the IMF, World Bank, and WTO have been established to govern the world economy and as many countries as possible within its orbit. To that end, both Wall Street and the U.S. Treasury Department — as the centers of U.S. finance and capital — give the rest of the world within its “sphere of influence” their marching orders. We see this as Third World nations have structural adjustment programs shoved down their throats by the IMF. These structural adjustment programs, SAPs, that are imposed by the IMF function so as to order the governments who are the recipients of these loans to break up labor unions, suspend wage structures that benefit workers, and condone the rape of the environment.
All of this is undertaken by the U.S. Global Empire in the furtherance of its corporate allies and in its strategic search for obtaining natural resources — such as oil, tungsten, ore — to shore up its domination of the planet. In fact, the Pentagon has said as much in its planning documents since 2001 when it writes of “full spectrum dominance.” What is that? It is the control of not only land, air, and sea by the American Empire, but outer space as well.

KZ: And, from the perspective of the world, isn’t the American empire a good thing? Don’t we bring stability and democracy to the world? Wouldn’t the world be a more violent place without us? Wouldn’t there be more poverty, disease and income disparity?
TP: From the perspective of the rest of the world, the American Empire is not a good thing; it is a curse. It deserves resistance, opposition, and overthrow. Why? Because it is a thing — a creation divorced from law and the moral codes of the teachings of all of the world’s great religious traditions.

Posted by: b real | May 21 2007 3:49 utc | 34

press release by the ogaden student forum
Condemning mass-killings and burning of towns in Ogaden

Having failed politically and militarily in its campaigns to subdue the struggle for independence in the Ogaden, the colonial regime of Ethiopia has resorted to a campaign of terror, indiscriminate killing, gang-raping, looting of civilian belongings and burning villages and farms. This scorched earth policy which, the Ethiopian regime is employing is all happening in the name of fighting The Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF).
To undertake this mission of exterminating the Ogaden masses, the Ethiopian government have poured thousands of its troops into the Ogaden region to support, the already excessive numbers of soldiers stationed there. From the last week of April, These merciless soldiers have gone on a killing spree, targeting innocent civilians including women and children.
As a result of these barbaric and inhumane acts by the Ethiopian military, Ogaden civilians are fleeing from the towns and villages terrified and worried.
In the latest incident, on May 17th, the vicious Ethiopian soldiers have completely burned down the town of Laasdoole. In the process, the soldiers have callously murdered a number of civilians, as well as taking dozens of others as hostages. The killed include the former chairman of the town council Mr. Duulane Guuleed Carab.
In Jigjiga, the regions capital, the Ethiopian occupation forces have detained hundreds of innocent civilians in the last couple of weeks alone. These helpless civilians are being tortured in military camps.
Therefore we, the Ogaden Students Forum (OSF) condemn these inhumane acts being committed against the defenceless people of Ogaden by the barbaric Ethiopian soldiers under the direct command of Meles Zenawi, the Ethiopian prime minister.
We believe that, repression, subjugation and oppression of innocent civilians have no place in the civilized and modern world. We also believe that perpetrators of human rights abuses should be brought to account and face justice.
Call for International Community to intervene in the Ogaden situation.
We call upon the UN, the European Union and the civilized world in general to directly intervene and look into the Ogaden situation urgently.
We appeal to the international community to ask the Ethiopian regime to halt its military campaign against the ogaden people & to censure the Ethiopian government over its operations and human rights abuses in the Ogaden
We call upon the International Community to send a fact-finding mission to see for themselves and assess the tragedy that is unfolding in the Ogaden.

Contact OSF
Ogaden Students Forum (OSF)
info@ogadenstudent.com
ogadensf@yahoo.com

Posted by: b real | May 21 2007 4:11 utc | 35

was out gallivanting in the “missouri rhineland” on a beautiful spring afternoon today & wound up at a winery in dutzow, the oldest german settlement in the state, listening to, of all things, a brazilian samba band. nice scenic, rolling countryside. plenty of wine flowing. good friends. happy people all around. unique german architecture, etc… but what really sticks w/ me tonite, hours later, was a small dog accompanying some visitor. incredibly, the dog’s visage was the spitting image of bismarck. no idea what it means, but i am haunted, as if i witnessed something out of a lovecraft tale.

Posted by: b real | May 21 2007 4:36 utc | 36

Slothrop
What about Negroponte in Baghdad?–death squads and “riding with the bad boys”? I bet you can find some Google on that.

Posted by: Copeland | May 21 2007 4:50 utc | 37

McClatchy: Efforts to stop `voter fraud’ may have curbed legitimate voting

During four years as a Justice Department civil rights lawyer, Hans von Spakovsky went so far in a crusade against voter fraud as to warn of its dangers under a pseudonym in a law journal article.

“Mr. von Spakovsky was central to the administration’s pursuit of strategies that had the effect of suppressing the minority vote,” charged Joseph Rich, a former Justice Department voting rights chief who worked under him.
He and other former career department lawyers say that von Spakovsky steered the agency toward voting rights policies not seen before, pushing to curb minor instances of election fraud by imposing sweeping restrictions that would make it harder, not easier, for Democratic-leaning poor and minority voters to cast ballots.

Posted by: b | May 21 2007 6:14 utc | 38

“the insinuation here is that the americans sought “cultural destruction” in order to divide & rule.
the truth, based on books like fiasco and emerald city, is the entire “liberation” was managed incompetently.”
How about sending managers (or orders) that do things that facilitate/allow “cultural destruction” and then claim the results were due to incompetence.
We shouldn’t forget that EVERYTHING the U.S. troops did or didn’t do were on direct orders from Washington. The looting of Baghdad was allowed to take place — this implies a strategy to the complicity, or they would have taken the necessary steps to prevent it (like the oil ministry). EVERYTHING the CPA did were on orders from Washington. You don’t think Bremmer disbanded the Iraqi Army, destroyed the state run industries, or instituted de-Baathification on his own initiative do you? To think all of these policies have resulted in this massive catastrophe, are the results of “incompetence” belies the fact that all these policies were are the results of those orders from Washington — AND NOT the results of some “incompetent” or hapless execution of those orders.
This “incompetence” thing is nothing more than retro-active intent to atomize the blame away. When they start talking about incompetence in the context of the decisions made in Washington — and WHY those decisions ARE incompetent, AND WHY they continue to make the same kind of decisions, then I’m ready to listen. Because those decisions can only be considered “incompetent” when their intent is made self evident. What does any of the decisions above have to do with the defined intent. What does allowing massive looting of cultural heritage or destruction of state run industry (for example) have to do with establishing democracy or creating a stable Iraq? Incompetence is just a red herring for the failure to create a vassal state in Iraq.

Posted by: anna missed | May 21 2007 7:16 utc | 39

Thank-you anna missed @#39 I said much the same here. However clumsily…

When one can create stability* through ‘structural chaos’, then everything that results from the bifurcation of the game, fortune or, more importantly, in this case, ‘misfortune’ of events, then every event episode becomes a magical a gift to the ptb; by waving the wand of prop-agenda and turning liabilities into assets. By tweaking the data to enhance and frame the story and magnifying data sets to your advantage, aka managing reality through media.
I have seen this done methodically and scientifically (read: clinically) over and over in circumstances such as this, where and if, one has an overview (the back story) e.g., of the whole of the stories details, then and only then can you see the glitch in the meta-narrative of the continuum.
In other words, the power of prop-agenda becomes the art of putting the story you want to be revealed under the microscope and then only using this compartmentalized data to be the thesis of that story. Where the actual reality of the events is a picked observation. One that obfuscates and overshadows other parts of the data. It is quite deliberate and effective.
cont..

*In my best Rodney Dangerfield voice*, I get no respect I tell ya…lol

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 21 2007 8:18 utc | 40

amen anna missed

Posted by: annie | May 21 2007 8:23 utc | 41

Right, it’s Just incompetence.
Then there’s this. No, it’s not out of R’Giap’s personal journal, but might as well be.
Anyone remember “Dr. Laura”, far right-winger who built a $100+k Million dollar empire, advising women to stay @home & raise their kids right…preaching church going, ethics, blahbittyblah…Recall her…
do you also recall that her son enlisted right out of high school & how proud she was? Well, the Army has just shut down his website for being so Repulsive…oops, showing the real family values of the Imperial Military.
  Deryk Schlessinger’s Web site indicated the 21-year-old soldier is stationed in Kandahar, Afghanistan, where, the site’s author writes, “godless crazy people like me,” have become “a generation of apathetic killers.”
The soldier son of talk radio relationship counselor Laura Schlessinger is under investigation for a graphic personal Web page that one Army official has called “repulsive.”
    The MySpace page, publicly available until Friday when it disappeared from the Internet, included cartoon depictions of rape, murder, torture and child molestation; photographs of soldiers with guns in their mouths; a photograph of a bound and blindfolded detainee captioned “My Sweet Little Habib”; accounts of illicit drug use; and a blog entry headlined by a series of obscenities and racial epithets.

she said, “We raised our son to be a warrior.” Dr. Laura’s Son Becomes Apathetic Killer
Gotta Love it…

Posted by: jj | May 21 2007 9:20 utc | 42

no, jj
that site is a forgery, put up by “our enemies” 😉

Posted by: jcairo | May 21 2007 9:40 utc | 43

The Nuremberg Defence is now “I didn’t know what I was doing.”
Let’s assume competence, in which case in Iraq: the puppet(s) would be in charge; the bases built; the corporate sponsors would have their booty and Iran would still be in the cross hairs…
Less death & destruction perhaps, but Chimpoleon still walks and quacks

Posted by: jcairo | May 21 2007 10:08 utc | 44

Haaretz editorial(!): A kind of military coup

Does Israel still uphold that proper state of affairs in which the elected government sets policy and civil servants carry it out? According to an article published in Haaretz yesterday (“The spirit of the commander prevails” by Meron Rapoport), it seems that with regard to the army, the answer is negative. While ministers speak about a two-state solution, a kind of military coup is taking place in the West Bank, in which the Israel Defense Forces are turning the area into the state of the settlers. While the Palestinian population is being suffocated, the settlements are flourishing.

Posted by: b | May 21 2007 11:23 utc | 45

The looting of Baghdad was allowed to take place — this implies a strategy to the complicity, or they would have taken the necessary steps to prevent it (like the oil ministry).
the reason for the chaos was low troop levels and poor planning. i just think it’s interesting that fisk of all people condemns the occupation for these reasons, with the odd conspiracy of nefarious intent among “imperialists” never rising above the status of hopeful insinuation.

Posted by: slothrop | May 21 2007 15:08 utc | 46

slothrop
it was not poor planning. it was what came about after many iterations of planning. there were people who said it was a bad idea at the time and some lost their jobs for speaking out about it.
It was a poor decision to choose this course of action, of that you will find no disagreement.
don’t try to put this on the Colonels and Majors that did the planning. They came up with the best possible plan given the constraints they had. The decision for troop strength was made at the highest levels. They wanted to do this on the cheap and got exactly what you almost always get when buy something that is too cheap….the chance to buy it again.

Posted by: dan of steele | May 21 2007 15:55 utc | 47

Actually, it was an evil decision. They use incompetence as a defense, here and everywhere else that government is supposed to be competent, instead of despised
They are competent at tasks assigned, and will be rewarded soon, each unto his position.
Simply and obviously, they don’t act in good faith, except to the money talkers, the financiers.

Posted by: plushtown | May 21 2007 16:42 utc | 48

A few facts about biological agents the government and media will never tell you about

The U.S. government has sanctioned the exposure of its own population to various, allegedly benign, bacterial agents including serratia marcens, and bacillus subtilus. In the end these agents weren’t entirely benign, and caused the deaths of American citizens submitted involuntarily to experiments conducted without their consent or knowledge.

Also see, US military begins planning for avian flu pandemic

WASHINGTON (AFP) – The US military has begun to plan for a possible avian flu pandemic that could kill as many as three million people in the United States in as little as six weeks, a
Pentagon planning document said.

Think I’m being alarmist here? Take a little walk down to your local campus or university and dig through the Gov docs department, in you will find:
PUBLIC LAW 95-79 [P.L. 95-79]
TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, SECTION 1520
“CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM”
“The use of human subjects will be allowed for the testing of chemical and biological agents by the U.S. Department of Defense, accounting to Congressional committees with respect to the experiments and studies.”
“The Secretary of Defense [may] conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological [warfare] agents on civilian populations [within the United States].”
-SOURCE-
Public Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 91, page 334, you will find Public Law 95-79. Public Law 97-375, title II, Sec. 203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1882. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 96, page 1882, you will find Public Law 97-375.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 21 2007 18:19 utc | 49


provide proof of this from any ofthe scads of leftish books written about the war.
reading a. cockburn’s book on rumsfeld doesn’t supoort your view yet.

Posted by: slothrop | May 21 2007 18:20 utc | 50

there just isn’t much support in the literature for the claim the chaos was intended from the outset.

Posted by: slothrop | May 21 2007 18:23 utc | 51

perhaps not in the literature, just in history and world news.

Posted by: plushtown | May 21 2007 18:33 utc | 52

addendum:
w/regards my #49
Take a wild guess who was Secretary of Defense under President Gerald Ford from 1975–1977.
Need I say more?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 21 2007 18:40 utc | 53

pr watch: U.S. Think Tank Calls for More Troops, More Propaganda

Source: The Hill, May 18, 2007
“A new security study released by the Third Way, a Democratic-leaning think tank,” and authored by two former Clinton administration officials, discusses how to rebuild U.S. credibility overseas. “American voters yearn for an alternative to the Bush administration’s aggressive foreign policy stance,” say the Brookings Institution’s William Galston and Harvard’s Elaine Kamarck, “but neither Democrats nor Republicans are articulating a different path.” Their study calls for “a robust military response to the terrorist threat,” along with “a massive public relations effort akin to the Cold War propaganda machine.” Militarily, the study suggests 100,000 more ground troops and “reinvigorated intelligence services.” It also calls for “a massive increase to the $140 million the United States spends annually on public diplomacy,” and “re-creating the United States Information Agency, which was folded into the State Department during the Clinton administration.”

Posted by: b real | May 21 2007 18:50 utc | 54

breal
to repeat the problem i have with our “us is empire” theme is certainty many have that “decline of empire” coincides with the emergence of a happy worlkd in which the lupin family can take sunday drives everyday to shop for organic veggies and goat curds. the problem here is an analytical infantalism insists the u.s. is some kind of unique expression of power untended by a larger system of domination. belief in the end of empire=end of capital is like end of osama=ende of “terror.”
notice how the the author slips from “empire” to “neoliberalism” as if both are the same thing. this is annoying. and it’s a self-serving distraction from more valuable critique of global capitalism which must be the aim of any leftist.
but, talk to johnny b cool. if you really want to know.

Posted by: slothrop | May 21 2007 19:19 utc | 55

This will have massive consequences: Kuwait drops peg in body blow to Gulf currency union

Kuwait unshackled its dinar from the tumbling U.S. dollar on Sunday and switched the exchange rate mechanism to a basket of currencies, throwing plans for currency union with other Gulf Arab oil producers into disarray.
Kuwait’s central bank, which battled speculators for weeks to defend the peg, said the dollar’s slide against other currencies had forced it to break ranks with fellow Gulf states to contain inflation from the rising cost of some imports.

Oman and Bahrain, the two smallest Gulf economies, and Saudi Arabia, the largest Arab economy, said they planned to stand by their pegs. There was no comment from the central bank of the United Arab Emirates, whose currency is likely to take centre stage on Monday as prospects for a single currency evaporate.

“The massive decline in the dollar’s exchange rate against main currencies … has contributed to the increase in local inflation rates and this step is part of the central bank’s efforts to curb inflationary pressure,” Sheikh Salem Abdul-Aziz al-Sabah said in a statement carried by state news agency KUNA

Note: There were attempts in the Gulf to move to a “single currency”. But that would have been pegged to the Dollar and thereby be just pure U.S. currency printed on a different sort of paper.
For Kuwait to move away from that is a big issue. If their currency is pegged to a “basket” the automatically will have to buy bonds issued in the currencies that are part of that basket.
The basket now consists of Euros, Pounds, Swiss Franken and U.S. Dollars instead of only Dollars. Billions of Kuwaiti oil money will now be invested in in those currencies instead of just in U.S. Dollars.
That will accelerate the Dollar to fall and will increase infaltion in the U.S.
The other Gulf countries, notably Saudi Arabi with a lot of investable money will follow that move.
A while ago I suspected a move on oil prices by the Arab Gulf nations to punish the U.S. With oil at $70/barrel they may go for a monetary punishment instead.

Posted by: b | May 21 2007 19:30 utc | 56

That will accelerate the Dollar to fall and will increase infaltion in the U.S.
jeez. inflation isn’t automatic. the dollar fell by half in the 80s and we trimmed the debt and boosted domestic manufacturing. energy prices were lower then to be ure. but, we need a more competitive dollar now.

Posted by: slothrop | May 21 2007 19:44 utc | 57

and, speaking of propaganda, this AFP wire article is full of it
Somali president warns of terrorist threat
grabs your attention, eh?

The Somali president has warned that “terrorists” were threatening his shattered country’s security and slammed international donors for failing to help as promised, in an interview with Agence France-Presse.
An Ethiopian-backed government offensive in Mogadishu last month ended weeks of clashes with Islamist-led insurgents that killed hundreds of civilians and forced tens of thousands to flee, but sporadic attacks are again on the increase.

the president and his unpopular imposed govt, the TFG, are the real terrorists, if, by terrorism, we mean violence used against civilians to force political objectives. but you won’t find that out in this AFP article, which may as well have been crafted in a thinktank somewhere in addis ababa, nairobi, or djibouti.
the “offensive” was not “ethiopian-backed” nor were they clashes. as my coverage has clearly shown over the past months, this was an aggressive invasion by u.s.-backed ethiopian forces to restore the warlords that had terrorized the citizens of somalia over the years up to the rise of the islamic courts union, which (temporarily) drove the warlords and their faux-government out of power. while there were indeed “clashes” between the ethiopian/TFG forces and militias loyal to the ICU, egregious war crimes were committed by the ethiopian forces as they deliberately shelled entire neighborhoods in mogadishu, indiscriminately & w/ complete disregard for human lives.
souding suspiciously similiar to the talking points being circulated out the ethiopian govt’s propaganda offices, the AFP article states that “hundreds of civilians” were killed when even the UN has declared that more than 1500 were killed in the latest multi-day fighting. before that, there were other battles in which more civilians were killed. and it is unknown how many civilians were killed in the initial invasion at the end of last year.
the AFP article also states that these battles “forced tens of thousands to flee” while it is generally accepted that up to 1/3rd of the population of mogadishu — between 350,000 to half-a-million people — fled the city to avoid the atrocities being committed by the ethiopians & the TFG. now, if that is not clearly terrorism, tell me what is.

“My government was battling terrorists who lost their strongholds militarily in Mogadishu, but they are still at large by hiding in the towns and villages,” Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed said late on Sunday at his official residence, Villa Somalia, which has been a target of mortar attacks.
“We don’t believe the threats of terrorists are over as some of them are abroad still planning to create havoc again,” he said.

again, the TFG is largely unpopular, as even pointed out by the italian deputy foreign minister, who recently visited and stated that “I believe the transitional government can not perform its duties due to lack of local support.”
as for villa somalia, the presidential palace of which AFP tells it readers “has been a target of mortar attacks,” it served as a base for ethiopian forces and uganda’s peacekeeping troops — occupying armies, let us not forget — from which much of the indiscriminate shelling of civilian neighborhoods was launched, which is why it was a target of the resistance. but, i suppose, that is not something that readers need to know.

Four Ugandan peacekeepers from an African Union force were killed in a bomb attack on their convoy last week, and the prime minister and mayor of Mogadishu both escaped unharmed from roadside bomb attacks in recent days.
Yusuf, who was elected president in 2004, also launched a scathing attack on international donors for failing to provide more help.

the deaths of the ugandan forces is being spun heavily, as i have already pointed out. the new u.s. envoy to somalia wasted no time to shout fire (AQ) in a loaded press conference. yet, the ugandan govt has publicly announced that AQ had nothing to do w/ the attacks. they are not willing to use their dead to further such propaganda.
nest, while it may be possible to state that yusuf was “elected president in 2004,” it’s pure misinformation to present that stmt as it appears in the article. he was appointed & elected to head the TFG by his fellow warlords (and foreign agents), but it is deliberately misleading to imply that he was elected as president of somalia by the citizens of somalia. on this point alone, the article could be qualified as propaganda, imo.
that yusuf, in AFP’s words, “launched a scathing attack on international donors” is not surprising, given his history as a hated warlord & his role in the war crimes committed in somalia this year.

“The outside world promised a reconstruction plan with a full package to develop the lives of Somalis in war-torn Somalia but efforts of the international community are confined to meagre humanitarian work,” he said.
“The United States is appreciating our struggle against terrorism but did not give any tangible assistance to reconstruct a devastated nation. Even the United Nations has yet to take drastic action to assist to rebuild Somalia,” he added.
“I don’t know what is true and what is false when it concerns the international community. I don’t appreciate hypocrisy.”
For their part, international aid groups say they are struggling to deliver vital food and supplies to the tens of thousands displaced by recent fighting in Mogadishu because of continued insecurity.

so now yusuf is attacking his ‘friends’ who helped attempt to restore him to power for misleading him. meanwhile, humanitarian groups & NGO’s are complaining b/c of the obstacles that the TFG is throwing up to prevent the delivery of aid to what one UN official, holmes, called the biggest humanitarian crisis in the world right now. the TFG has been accused of stealing supplies, confiscating food, etc.
and yusuf whines to the AFP that he doesn’t “appreciate” hypocrisy.
well, i’m sure he appreciates the public relations boost he gets from drivel like this piece from AFP. still won’t help strengthen the TFG’s precarious hold on mogadishu, though, or build up any real legitimacy for them.

Posted by: b real | May 21 2007 19:46 utc | 58

slothrop- the problem i have with our “us is empire” theme is certainty many have that “decline of empire” coincides with the emergence of a happy worlkd in which…
a bit of a strawman, isn’t it?
one step at a time, imo.

Posted by: b real | May 21 2007 20:02 utc | 59

sloth
the analytic infantilism – is all yours. a book by robert fisk do not an argument make. you have made manifold erroneus elaborations on the ‘absence of empire’ – combined with an extremely crude economism that would give a heart attack to those american founders of a critique of capital – baran & sweezy (whom you would be well advised to give another gander when yr not attacking us empiricists)
as i’ve sd – your argument in relation to iraq & indeed to the middle east – exhibit an awesome absence of detail & often of precision. i know you are capable of that – so its absence in this regard is telling.
& in regard to research – you seem to be very anglocentric because there are a whole swathe of books & articles available in french, italian & german – giving details to the immoral & illegal imperial occupation – that is iraq — that books like fiasco, blackwater, cobra ll or even fisk only begin to understand. sometimes what those books don’t say tell us more than we want to know. a tension tuned & turning
& tonight in the occupied territories & in lebanon it is very tense indeed

Posted by: remembereringgiap | May 21 2007 20:43 utc | 60

slothrop,
can’t tell if you are being deliberately dishonest or you simply believed everything that old actor told you.
the debt was not trimmed at all during the 80’s. It grew and grew. what could anyone expect would happen when you cut taxes and increase spending? duh! here is one graph, you can find others, that paints a pretty clear picture.

Posted by: dan of steele | May 21 2007 20:44 utc | 61

ugh. trade deficit, i meant to say.

Posted by: slothrop | May 21 2007 21:04 utc | 62

“empiricist”–hehe. you made a funny.
and i’m certain by this point your declared erudition is fake.
i offered an empirical account of empire posted by b twice and you did not respond. you should pay better attention.

Posted by: slothrop | May 21 2007 21:13 utc | 63

regarding the godterm “empire,” chomsky is an unhelpful reproducer. i haven’t heard or read everything, who could, but he doesn’t provide an account of global capitalism that would help to understand empire as a kind of post-national class formation, which exists as i’ver taken pains to do here.
in any event, why is it just me upon whgom the burden falls to try and explain this? there are dozens of leftist authors–economists, sociologists, philosophers–who routinely disabuse the moribund view of america as titular “empire.” “empire,” sure, but with massive qualifications.
and no breal, i don’t think i make a strawman becauswe i constantly try to dissect the complexity of “empire.” whatever strawman made of the term is done by rgiap and others here.
.

Posted by: slothrop | May 21 2007 21:26 utc | 64

slothrop
i have never claimed erudition – after all, i am a simple man
i thought your posts which i read were better left without my comment. as i have sd before we might agree on a whole series of questions but on this question of an american empire i am unbudgeable – or infantile if you prefer
what i have sd repeatedly is there is an absence of precision, of detail – i have never sd there was an absence of thought
i pointed out what i understood to be your anglocentrism simply because you create a strawman out of those of us in europe & of the critiques of empire that can be found there
& i think all of us have a special duty to read the arab press in whatever language we can – especially if that link is true about the coup at aljazeera

Posted by: remembereringgiap | May 21 2007 22:56 utc | 65

& there seems to be much boo hooing over govt of veneuzala cancelling the licence of opposition t v station
omitting the fact that it played a central & motivating role in the coup against chavez. that media has clearly revealed their connection with the miami oligarchy & their deeply antidemocratic platform – but these particular details missing from anu coverage – in fact no commentary on the coup

Posted by: remembereringgiap | May 22 2007 0:20 utc | 66

be interesting to see if this project ever actually gets off the ground
Notice-to-Proceed Launches Ambitious Red Sea Crossing

Acting on endorsements and pledges of land from the president of Yemen and the president of the African nation of Djibouti, a Dubai-based developer has tapped an American firm to build a bridge across the Red Sea.
Middle East Development LLC on April 25 issued a notice-to-proceed to Noor City Development Corp., Napa, Calif. It authorizes Noor City, as sole agent, “to proceed with the planning, development, construction and management of the bridge between Yemen and Djibouti.”

Noor City is forming an international commission to refine concepts for a design/build/operate/transfer concession to create the rail and highway crossing. Concepts developed by Danish engineering firm COWI envision a 28.5 km crossing with a suspension span over the Bab al Mendab Straits.
Phase I will likely be a 3.5 km leap to the Yemeni island of Perim and a 4 km land link to the western channel. Phase II may be broken into several contracts for the 21.5 km transit to Djibouti, which will include 13 km of suspension bridge and 8 km of girder bridge. Cost is estimated at between $10 billion and $20 billion, depending on design, project organization and financing. Construction would take seven to nine years.

a bin laden firm wants to develop a bridge to connect africa to the ME. man, j peter pham will have a conniption fit when he hears about that 😉

Posted by: b real | May 22 2007 4:57 utc | 67

One more neologism down the tubes. Does this mean its going to be a “short” war? But, short wars got no reason to live.

Posted by: anna missed | May 22 2007 9:08 utc | 68

Mark Lynch, six questions on Iraq. Emerging new dynamics.

Posted by: anna missed | May 22 2007 9:21 utc | 69

Uncle, #21, that’s the ONLY story we should be talking about. All he has to do is slip Blackwater a couple of bucks to pull a stunt – hell, Erik would prob. be only too happy to throw it in as the whipped cream & cherry on the top of the sundae the govt. fed them in Iraq – paying them ~$950/day/mercenary, while Blackwater paid wages of ~$250-300/day for said mercenary.
Do you know if kos is featuring the story?
Congress should hold up all funding for WH in the budget until he throws that directive in the garbage – or withhold funding for Operation Wreck Iraq.
Beyond Blackwater, it sounds like planning for the collapse of our currency they’ve purposely destroyed.

Posted by: jj | May 22 2007 9:51 utc | 70

Excellent posts anna missed! Thank-you.
Yes jj, I think dkos did feature the story a few times, but that’s not where I got it.
And on a similar note Dr. R J Hillhouse whom blogs at The Spy Who Billed Me blog sent me a great interview she did w/ head of blackwater inc., that I have yet to post because it’s on my laptop, hopefully, Ill post it later today.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 22 2007 10:18 utc | 71

Uncle, pls. do. I hrd. recent interview w/Jeremy Scahill. He said since he’s been on bk. tour, Blackwater employees & x-emp. have been coming up to him telling him that it’s far worse than he knows. He didn’t elaborate.

Posted by: jj | May 22 2007 13:11 utc | 72

is this the interview?
Exclusive Interview: Blackwater USA’s President Gary Jackson
what exactly is the deal w/ hillhouse? she appears to have a thing for discrediting scahill in order to promote her own book.

Posted by: b real | May 22 2007 14:11 utc | 73

interesting rhetorical device from the u.s. missionary…oops, i mean ambassador to nigeria, john campbell that i noticed in an quick mention in an article posted today by a nigerian paper

The United States (U.S.) Ambassador, John Campbell has said that Nigerian journalists contribute directly to American perception and understanding of Nigeria and Africa. He spoke yesterday at a Roundtable Discussion on Press Freedom in Nigeria put together by the American Embassy in Nigeria. “I have said many times that Nigerians and Americans are fellow pilgrims on the road to democracy and the rule of law,” Campbell said.

aside from the amazing grasp of the obvious that father campbell displayed as he enlightened his audience of journalists of the ramifications of their line of work, i found the “pilgrims” line interesting.
turns out he does regularly use the metaphor.

My choice of subject this morning is not entirely unrelated to the fact that elections in 2007 will be a milestone in this country’s journey toward democracy. We are fellow pilgrims on that road, and so Nigeria might find of interest our own experience in working through how elections can become the genuine voice of the people.

The achievement of free and fair elections involving all citizens has been for us a struggle that lasted almost two centuries, and still we are striving to get things right. America stands by Nigerians, our fellow pilgrims on the road to democracy and the rule of law, to help where we can as you work through the registration and election process, but always, only at your invitation.
“217 Years since the First American Election and the Work for Universal Suffrage Continues”, August 8, 2006

What I like to say is that Nigeria and America are fellow pilgrims on the road to democracy conducted by the rule of law. It’s a pilgrimage. Democracy is an ideal; it is something you are always striving for, it is a journey. It is not something that you achieve, and then you don’t have to worry about it again. It is something that you always have to work on.

What we want to do is to celebrate the progress that Nigeria is making; to assist Nigeria in that pilgrimage, where Nigeria asks for assistance. But also, to learn from the Nigerian experience, where Nigerians are addressing issues which we also have to address.

I wouldn’t presume to give advice to Nigeria. Nigeria is as I said before a fellow pilgrim on the road to democracy. Nigeria moves on that road in a way that reflects Nigeria’s own history and experience. My own personal view is that when we are talking about the journey towards democracy, the rule of law is an essential component. And with the rule of law comes transparency.
“Rule of Law Is Crucial To Survival of Democracy in Nigeria”, 17 – 03 – 2007

exactly why the good reverend campbell insists that nigerians should identify themselves as pilgrims in their own lands is never made clear. but i’d bet most of ’em can figure it out.

Posted by: b real | May 22 2007 15:06 utc | 74

a pilgrim’s progress…
Nigeria: Country Overtakes Saudi Arabia in Crude Supply to U.S.

Nigeria has overtaken Saudi Arabia in the ranking of crude oil exporters to the United States, a preliminary data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) has shown.
According to the EIA data on the US crude import rankings in March 2007, Nigeria, Africa’s biggest oil producer and the world’s eighth, leaped from fifth place in February to third in March, pushing Saudi Arabia, the world’s top exporter into fourth place. Canada and Mexico held on to first and second places, with crude exports to the US of 1.776 million barrels per day (b/d), down 64,000 b/d from February, and 1.621 million b/d — 263,000 b/d up from February.
But Saudi Arabia, with an average 1.231 million b/d in March, found itself behind Nigeria with 1.29 million b/d. US crude imports from the kingdom had dipped by 374,000 b/d in February to average 1.185 million b/d over that month, recovering by just 46,000 b/d in March. Volumes from Nigeria were up 229,000 b/d from February’s 1.061 million b/d.
Venezuela took fifth place with 1.036 million b/d, down from February’s 1.115 million b/d.
The EIA data also showed the remaining countries on the list of top ten crude exporters to the US all supplied volumes well below the million b/d level. In sixth place was Angola with 696,000 b/d, up from 451,000 b/d in February.
Iraq took seventh place, boosting crude exports to the US to 523,000 b/d from 325,000 b/d in February.
Algeria was in eighth place, boosting volumes to 501,000 b/d in March from 392,000 b/d the previous month. Kuwait and Brazil took ninth and tenth place respectively, with 288,000 b/d — up from 158,000 b/d– and 209,000 b/d — a doubling of February’s 103,000 b/d.

Posted by: b real | May 22 2007 15:12 utc | 75

Here’s a world disaster map out of Budapest, shows which volcanoes are currently active, recent earthquakes, etc. Place cursor over symbol, get English info. Oh, think the Blackwater stuff really interesting, especially for what will happen when “plausible deniability” (last 2 words in Esquire article) is less important.

Posted by: plushtown | May 22 2007 16:06 utc | 76

let’s hope that it does stay in the ground. everyone’s much better off in the long run. same issue that native americans are dealing w/ in the western half of the u.s.
— — —
f. william engdahl: China and USA in New Cold War over Africa’s Oil Riches: Darfur? It’s the Oil, Stupid…

To paraphrase the famous quip during the 1992 US Presidential debates, when an unknown William Jefferson Clinton told then-President George Herbert Walker Bush, “It’s the economy, stupid,” the present concern of the current Washington Administration over Darfur in southern Sudan is not, if we were to look closely, genuine concern over genocide against the peoples in that poorest of poor part of a forsaken section of Africa.
No. “It’s the oil, stupid.”
Hereby hangs a tale of cynical dimension appropriate to a Washington Administration that has shown no regard for its own genocide in Iraq, when its control over major oil reserves is involved. What’s at stake in the battle for Darfur? Control over oil, lots and lots of oil.
The case of Darfur, a forbidding piece of sun-parched real estate in the southern part of Sudan, illustrates the new Cold War over oil, where the dramatic rise in China’s oil demand to fuel its booming growth has led Beijing to embark on an aggressive policy of—ironically– dollar diplomacy. With its more than $1.3 trillion in mainly US dollar reserves at the Peoples’ National Bank of China, Beijing is engaging in active petroleum geopolitics. Africa is a major focus, and in Africa, the central region between Sudan and Chad is priority. This is defining a major new front in what, since the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, is a new Cold War between Washington and Beijing over control of major oil sources. So far Beijing has played its cards a bit more cleverly than Washington. Darfur is a major battleground in this high-stakes contest for oil control.

and i was never able to find a transcript of gaddafi’s recent appearance at oxford union, where he brought up the same issue and which was rebroadcast by the bbc this past sunday. unable to find video of that, either. only a bbc news clip on it.

Posted by: b real | May 22 2007 18:14 utc | 78

better link to that engdahl article (it’s got a map & prints nice)
Darfur? It’s the Oil, Stupid…: China and USA in New Cold War over Africa’s oil riches

Posted by: b real | May 22 2007 18:43 utc | 79

Heads up kids, don’t forget Goodling testimony tomorrow May 23rd.
10:15 CSPAN3. Be there.
TPM quote:
“Monica Goodling is devoutly religious, which is to say she cannot tell right from wrong.”
As someone said, Monica has every incentive to own up to as much as she possibly can, however, we know she wont.
Anyone that thinks Goodling’s testimony is going to be a “bombshell” is suffering from that Republican trait known as delusionism. She is a true believer that subscribes to the extremeist fundamentalist tenet that a lie that serves a greater good is not a lie. That greater good is a theocratic society with a strong male leader at the helm of the ship of state. Too many people have been saying during the course of on going investigations “just wait till ______________(fill in the blank) testifies then the whole house of cards will come tumbling down.” It hasn’t happened and from past experience is not likely to happen in the future. Goodling and her masters know that even if she lies or her testimony is less than forthcoming the Democrats lack the courage to inflict any punishment despite their grant of immunity. The Republicans on the Committee will rally to her and the Administrations defense. This will play well in a corrupted and compromised media. The Democrats are out maneuvered at every step and lack the righteous indignation this Administration has engendered in the public at large.
And ask yourself how that is, how are they ‘out maneuvered at every step’?, I strongly suspect it is due to the wiretaps and other surveillance.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 22 2007 19:02 utc | 80

Hell, the lies and Offuscation has already begun..
not ten minutes after posting #80 we get this… Monica “Refuses” to turn over documents!

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 22 2007 19:40 utc | 81

Oil eh?
Biden calls for military force in Darfur
‘I think it’s time to put force on the table and use it’ – Sen. Biden

Posted by: Rick | May 22 2007 19:53 utc | 82

rick- yep, biden is a hawk on this issue. guess he has yet to come upon any sudanese who are “articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking”
US Senator Biden to meet with UN Secretary General on Darfur

May 20, 2007 (WASHINGTON) — Joseph Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a Democratic presidential candidate, will meet with the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon on Monday to discuss progress in resolving the conflict in Darfur.
Biden has been one of the most outspoken US lawmakers in urging the US administration intervention in Darfur. He called last April for the use of military force to end the suffering in Darfur.

Posted by: b real | May 22 2007 20:39 utc | 83

interview: Chomsky on India-Pakistan Relations

Noam Chomsky is a noted linguist, author, and foreign policy expert. On April 26, Michael Shank interviewed him about relations between India and Pakistan. This is the second part of a two-part interview. The first part, on the Iraq War, the World Bank, and debt, can be found here.

Posted by: b real | May 22 2007 22:46 utc | 84

this is not a surprise
iht: Ethiopian military held 3 New York Times journalists for 5 days

Three journalists for The New York Times were arrested by the Ethiopian military on May 16 in the Ogaden region of the country, held for five days and interrogated at gunpoint, and then released on Monday without any charges being lodged against them, The Times said on Tuesday.
The three journalists – Jeffrey Gettleman, 35, the Nairobi bureau chief; Vanessa Vick, 43, a photographer; and Courtenay Morris, 34, a videographer – were reporting on the conflict in the Ogaden region of Ethiopia when they were detained by soldiers in the town of Degeh Bur.
While in detention, they were moved to three different jails before being released from a prison in Addis Ababa on Monday.
The three journalists, who have now left Ethiopia, said they were never told why they were detained, and that Ethiopian military officials refused to notify the American embassy of their arrest. During questioning, Vick was kicked in the back, and all three were repeatedly threatened.
Ethiopian soldiers confiscated all of the journalists’ equipment, including computers, cameras, mobile phones and notebooks; none of the equipment has been returned. The Ethiopian security forces say they are holding the equipment for security reasons.

ogaden online editorial: Ethiopia Determined to Conceal The Ogaden Plight From the World Community

The illegal detention and release without charge or explanation of the three New York Times journalists in Ogaden by the Ethiopian Military confirms the veracity of what the Ogaden press has been publishing for years now.
Illegal detentions, physical torture and threatening torture, as was the case with the Times journalists, are the order of the day for the Ogaden citizenry in the hands of the Ethiopian military and its associated militias. Worse there are rapes and extra judicial killings carried out daily by the Ethiopian military and its associated militias in many parts
of Ogaden.
These atrocities against the helpless Ogaden civilians are witnessed and reported ONLY by the Ogaden press whose few reporters defy death in order to report what the Ogaden populace has faced for a century and quarter now in the hands of successive Ethiopian regimes. Only the Ogaden press was even aware that these journalists were detained in the first place and reported the journalists’ detention.
Ethiopia is determined to conceal, at all costs, the plight of the Ogaden populace. It is the very reason why no foreign journalist or visitor is allowed to set foot in Ogaden. It is also why the Times journalists were detained to prevent the publication of whatever information they might have gathered during their brief sojourn in Ogaden.
Ethiopia understands that should any foreign journalist visit Ogaden, he or she will get an accurate picture of the extent of maltreatment and colonial subjugation faced by the Ogaden populace in the hands of the current Ethiopian regime.
It is the Ethiopian regime’s inherent belief that what the outside world can not see and hence prove can always be explained away as an Ogaden propaganda should questions be raised by the few prying eyes of the West.The policy of the current autocracy in Addis Ababa is to confine Westernjournalists in Addis Ababa and its environs instead of allowing them to visit Ogaden, the current theatre of death.
Even the few brave Non-Governmental Organizations, NGO that work in Ogaden are not accorded freedom of movement. There are documented cases where NGOs were attacked by disguised Ethiopian military personnel and associated militias in order to manufacture insecurity and force these NGOs to repatriate their staff from Ogaden cities.
The world should know that atrocities are taking place in Ogaden; atrocities carried out by a regime hell bent to conceal the extent of the plight of the Ogaden populace. If this regime can detain without charge, and contrary to all diplomatic conventions, American journalists for five days, one can understand what awaits any other journalist who attempts to document atrocities carried out the Ethiopian regime in Ogaden.
The detention of the Times journalists should be a wake up call to the world community. The world community and its press should not abandon the Ogaden people. The world community should investigate the extent of maltreatment and colonial subjugation in Ogaden. The world community should insist that Ethiopia allow foreign journalists access to Ogaden. Hopefully the world community will no longer allow Ethiopia to conceal the plight of the Ogaden populace.

Posted by: b real | May 23 2007 3:41 utc | 85

As Comrades Search, Fatal Bomb Wreaks Havoc

After about 15 minutes, they came across a one-story stone house with a wide grass lawn, a cattle pen and five young men whom the Iraqi soldiers had lined up against a wall. Their names were checked against a list of insurgents wanted for questioning in relation to the May 12 attack.
None of their names appeared, but Captain Abercrombie ordered them arrested anyway, in light of the bomb attack that morning.
“I’m detaining them all,” he said. “For proximity.”

Posted by: b | May 23 2007 4:42 utc | 86