|
Weekend OT
Nigeria: Stop Treating Niger-Delta People Like Animals, 4 American Hostages Tell FG
ELEVEN days in a hideaway in the creek where they are being watched over by armed militants, the four American oil workers who were kidnapped by Niger-Delta Freedom Fighters (Egbema One) say they, totally, understand now, the reason why militants in the Niger-Delta are up in arms against the government, declaring emphatically that that there is no human being with blood flowing in his veins that will not be provoked to carry arms if he is treated like an animal, the way Niger-Deltans are being treated.
The hostages: Mike Roussel (anchor operator), Chris Gay (anchor operator), Larry Plake (anchor operator) and Kevin Faller (barge foreman), all workers of Global Industries, a Lagos-based oil servicing company to the Chevron Nigeria Limited (CNL) spoke to the Saturday Vanguard exclusively in the base camp of the militants, Thursday evening.
…
Unanimously, they called on the Federal Government to speed up and meet the demands of the militants, which is basically an agreement to the effect that the government and oil companies operating in their areas would provide the natives with basic amenities like road, potable water, electricity and other things to facilitate their release by the freedom fighters.
They were all in good health when this reporter met with them but each one of them wants to go home and re-unite with their families as soon as possible. They also confirmed that the militants were taking care of them under the circumstances
From their mien, the hostages were also confident of the fact that the militants do not mean any harm to them as individuals and that, they were mere tools in the multifaceted and volatile struggle by an underprivileged and subjugated people for recognition and attention by their government.
Chris Gay told Saturday Vanguard: “Their struggle is a genuine struggle for the emancipation of their people. They told us and I have seen it that the reason why they kidnapped us is to draw the attention of the government and the oil companies to their suffering. They want job for the natives; they want government to help them out. Generally, they want development, which is why we are being held”.
On his part, Mike Roussel asserted that “the people are starving; they want schools for their children. That is the most important to them. They want jobs also, they don’t have money. Just look at the water they bath with and drink, which tells you right away that something has to be done.
“I want the Nigerian government to bring us out of here to enable me go home to my family as soon as possible. The government should come in here and try to help these people out and their children. Everybody needs education because without education, you have nothing and here, they don’t have schools”, he said.
Kevin Faller, who quivered, as he spoke said he had learnt many lessons from his stay so far in the creek. In his words: “Yes, I have learnt many things, the nature of how these people are being treated, how they have to live and you see, everyone is a human being and not an animal and these people deserve the good things of life like others too. There is no way they would not be provoked to carry arms and do what they are doing when they are not provided with basic amenities.
“They are very poor and from what I can see, there are no schools, hospitals, no roads and if something happens, it will take a long time to get to the hospital and maybe, the person being rushed to the hospital will die before they get there. It hurts to see human beings live the way these people are living in the Niger-Delta, no one deserves to live like this”, he added.
To the fourth hostage, Larry Plake, “our eyes have been opened to a lot of things we didn’t know about the sufferings of the Niger-Deltans. The militants have showed us a lot of things that we did not know before of their position. Things like how they live, how they are treated and all that, it is not right, I must say.
“They have nothing. And what they have at all is from their own land. Have you not seen their houses, they bring down trees to make their ramshackle buildings, they bath and drink from the same water they pollute. The food they eat here, we cannot eat it.
“I want the government to understand the plight of these people first. Let the eyes of the leaders of Nigeria be opened on the real problems of the Niger-Delta people. It is only when their eyes are really opened that they can tackle it. A human being does not have to live the way these people are living in the creek. They should have schools, hospitals, houses to live, not these ramshackle huts they live in, not things they have to build like what we have seen. There should be electricity and spring water. In fact, so many things are missing here”, he asserted.
Nigeria: Shell Resumes 170,000bpd Production in Niger Delta
Royal Dutch Shell yesterday resumed operations in the Niger Delta to restore 170,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil production after a protest at its major pipeline hub.
According to Shell’s spokesman, the company has regained access to its Ogoni site, after the six-day protest in the Ogoni area of the Niger Delta, which had raised the tally of oil supply cut by violence to about 900,000 bpd, or one third of total capacity in the country. Nigeria is the world’s eighth largest exporter. The crisis in the Niger Delta had led to world oil price increase.
The Dutch oil giant had halted oil production in the Ogoni area 14 years ago as a result of popular protests, which were a precursor to today’s violent insurgency in the Niger Delta.
… Villagers from K-Dere community had staged a protest to demand a stake in the oil flowing through their land, but vacated the site on Wednesday after their elders promised to settle the issue in talks with Shell over the next few days.
Meanwhile, US major Chevron also disclosed yesterday that only about 7,000 bpd of its Escravos oil production was still closed after a community invasion at its Abiteye facility on May 7, causing a disruption on its 70,000 bpd production prior to its original estimate of 42,000 bpd.
According to a report, rebels fighting for local control over oil wealth have stepped up attacks to press their demands, but the line between militancy and crime are blurred and frequent kidnappings are mostly motivated by money.
Twelve foreigners are still being held hostage there after a Belarussian woman working as an industry contractor, who was abducted on May 5 in Port Harcourt was released on Wednesday night.
as the first article i linked to supports, the kidnappings are not “mostly motivated by money.” they draw attention to the desperate plight of the residents being shit on by big oil & the nigerian federal govt.
meanwhile, not any surprise, now that a few weeks have passed since the election farce in nigeria & outsiders can move on
Nigeria: US: Nigeria Still Strategic Partner, Despite Election Flaws
The United States of America (USA) views Nigeria as a very important and strategic partner and would continue to work with her in spite of the fact that the recent elections in the country fell short of expectations.
The US government’s position was made known yesterday by the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of African Affairs, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, at a press briefing on the forthcoming Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) taking place in Ghana this month.
“All of you have read the statement of the US government. We were very disappointed at the results of the election and how those elections were carried out. They were a disappointment not only to us, but I think it was an opportunity lost for Nigeria. That said, Nigeria being what Nigeria is remains a very important strategic country to the US and we will continue to have bilateral relations with the Nigerian government.”
…
AGOA which was signed into law by the US government in 2000 encourages African countries to open their economies as well as build free markets. Thomas-Greenfield disclosed that AGOA had made tremendous progress within the period, saying that about 47 per cent of US imports in 2006 were from Nigeria. The import was mainly made up of crude oil totaling a sum of $25.8 billion for last year.
— — —
Chavez demands Pope apologize for Indian comments
CARACAS (Reuters) – Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez demanded Pope Benedict apologize to Indians in Latin America for saying this month in Brazil that the Roman Catholic Church purified them.
Chavez, who regularly clashes with the Catholic Church in Venezuela but had not directly criticized the Pope before, accused the Pontiff on Friday of ignoring the “holocaust” that followed Christopher Columbus’s 1492 landing in the Americas.
“With all due respect your Holiness, apologize because there was a real genocide here and, if we were to deny it, we would be denying our very selves,” Chavez said at an event on freedom of expression.
In a speech to Latin American and Caribbean bishops at the end of a visit to Venezuela’s neighbor Brazil, the Pope said the Church had not imposed itself on the indigenous peoples of the Americas.
Indian leaders in the region were outraged by the comments.
Posted by: b real | May 20 2007 0:48 utc | 16
He who laughs Last (NSPD 51 – HSPD 20): Bush Anoints Himself as the Insurer of Constitutional Government in Emergency
With scarcely a mention in the mainstream media, President Bush has ordered up a plan for responding to a catastrophic attack.
In a new National Security Presidential Directive, Bush lays out his plans for dealing with a “catastrophic emergency.”Under that plan, he entrusts himself with leading the entire federal government, not just the Executive Branch. And he gives himself the responsibility “for ensuring constitutional government.”
He laid this all out in a document entitled “National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD 51” and “Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20.”
The White House released it on May 9.
Other than a discussion on Daily Kos led off by a posting by Leo Fender, and a pro-forma notice in a couple of mainstream newspapers, this document has gone unremarked upon.
The subject of the document is entitled “National Continuity Policy.”
It defines a “catastrophic emergency” as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government function.”
This could mean another 9/11, or another Katrina, or a major earthquake in California, I imagine, since it says it would include “localized acts of nature, accidents, and technological or attack-related emergencies.”
The document emphasizes the need to ensure “the continued function of our form of government under the Constitution, including the functioning of the three separate branches of government,” it states.
But it says flat out: “The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government.”
The document waves at the need to work closely with the other two branches, saying there will be “a cooperative effort among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Federal Government.” But this effort will be “coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity with respect to the legislative and judicial
branches and with proper respect for the constitutional separation of powers.”
Among the efforts coordinated by the President would ensuring the capability of the three branches of government to “provide for orderly succession” and “appropriate transition of leadership.”
The document designates a National Continuity Coordinator, who would be the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.
Currently holding that post is Frances Fragos Townsend.
She is required to develop a National Continuity Implementation Plan and submit it within 90 days.
As part of that plan, she is not only to devise procedures for the Executive Branch but also give guidance to “state, local, territorial, and tribal governments, and private sector owners and operators of critical infrastructure.”
The secretary of Homeland Security is also directed to develop planning guidance for “private sector critical infrastructure owners and operators,” as well as state, local, territorial, and tribal governments.
The document gives the Vice President a role in implementing the provisions of the contingency plans.
“This directive shall be implanted in a manner that is consistent with, and facilitates effective implementation of, provisions of the Constitution concerning succession to the Presidency or the exercise of its powers, and the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (3 USC 19), with the consultation of the Vice President and, as appropriate, others involved.”
The document also contains “classified Continuity Annexes.”
Also, FROM WHITE HOUSE.GOV:
NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51 & HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20
And while I’m here, as we read the madness of the times with jaw dropping
regularity here’s one more, From Detroit News:
Nuke official’s comments stir security concerns
“I was a hired assassin.”
Feds seek answers after former chief at Palisades plant told magazine he was a hired assassin.
Paul Egan and Gordon Trowbridge / The Detroit News
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
The former Palisades plant security chief’s claims he was an assassin has prompted probes. See full image
Federal nuclear watchdogs and members of Congress are seeking answers after a former security director at a western Michigan nuclear plant gave a bizarre series of interviews to Esquire magazine in which he claimed to be a hired assassin.
William E. Clark, who until recently was security chief at the Palisades nuclear power plant near South Haven on Lake Michigan, told the magazine for an article in its June edition that he had worked as a government assassin, killing people in Vietnam, New Orleans and Iraq.
The article suggested most of Clark’s claims were false and that he was emotionally unstable
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which is responsible for safety and security at the nation’s nuclear plants, has sent questions on the issue to Entergy Corp., the plant’s current owner, according to Viktoria Mitlyng , a spokeswoman for the agency’s regional office in Illinois. Consumers Energy Co. owned Palisades at the time Clark was hired; a third company, Nuclear Management Co., managed the plant for Consumers.
A spokesman for U.S. Rep. Fred Upton, R-St. Joseph, said Entergy has promised to investigate and update him on its findings. Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., has called on NRC officials to investigate; Clark was employed at a Massachusetts plant before moving to Palisades.
Lana Pollack, president of the Michigan Environmental Council, said the article raises serious concerns about how key personnel at U.S. nuclear and chemical facilities — prime targets for potential terrorist attacks — are screened.
“If it were a movie, it would be amusing; in real life, it’s upsetting,” Pollack said Thursday. “The idea that he had full access to the Palisades plant and a fully armed team of guards who answered to him would be a stunning security lapse.”
Mark Savage, a spokesman for the Palisades plant, said Clark took a medical leave on April 17 and resigned for medical reasons on May 9.
Mitlyng would not say specifically what information the NRC was seeking, but said federal rules on security and background checks for sensitive workers had become stricter after the 2001 terrorist attacks.
Arline Datu, a spokeswoman for Nuclear Management, said the firm took security very seriously, and that all employees, including Clark, undergo a strict background check. She said she could not comment on whether any procedures were missed in Clark’s case.
Here’s the Esquire Story
Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 20 2007 3:00 utc | 21
what follows are exerpts from fisk’s war for civilization. the following exposes how tenuous the argument is–and an argunment fisky always wants to make–that america caused the interreligious conflict and cultural catastrophe of iraqi nationalism:
But “liberation” had already turned into occupation. Faced by a crowd of angry Iraqis in Fardus Square demanding a new Iraqi government “for our protection and security and peace,” U.S. Marines, who should have been providing that protec tion, stood shoulder to shoulder facing them, guns at the ready. The reality, which the Americans-and of course, Mr. Rumsfeld-failed to understand, was that under Saddam, the poor and deprived were always the Shia Muslims, the middle classes always the Sunnis just as Saddam himself was a Sunni. So it was the Sunnis who were now suffering plunder at the hands of the Shia. And so the gun battles that broke out between property-owners and looters were, in effect, a conflict between Sunni and Shia Muslims. “By failing to end this violence-by stoking ethnic hatred through their inactivity-the Americans are now provoking a civil war in Baghdad,” I wrote that night in The Independent:
I drove through the city for more than an hour. Hundreds of streets are now barricaded off with breeze blocks, burned cars and tree trunks, watched over by armed men who are ready to kill strangers who threaten their homes or shops … A few Marine patrols did dare to venture into the suburbs yesterday-positioning themselves next to hospitals which had already been looted-but fires burned across the city at dusk for the third consecutive day. The municipality building was blazing away last night and on the horizon other great fires were sending columns of smoke miles high into the air. Too little too late. Yesterday, a group of chemical engineers and water purification workers turned up at the Marine headquarters, pleading for protection so they could return to their jobs. Electrical supply workers came along, too. But Baghdad is already a city at war with itself, at the mercy of gunmen and thieves. . . “You are American!” a woman shouted at me in English. . . “Go back to your country. Get out of here. You are not wanted here. We hated Saddam and now we are hating Bush because he is destroying our city.” It was a mercy she could not visit the Museum of Antiquity to see for herself that the very heritage of her country-as well as her city-has been destroyed.
And so, on 14 April, it was the burning of books. First came the looters, then came the arsonists. It was the final chapter in the sack of Baghdad. The National Library and Archives-a priceless treasure of Ottoman documents including the old royal archives of Iraq-were turned to ashes in 3,ooo degrees of heat. Then the library of Korans at the Ministry of Religious Endowment was set ablaze. I saw the looters. One of them cursed me when I tried to reclaim a book of Islamic law from a boy who could have been no more than ten years old. Amid the ashes of hundreds of years of Iraqi history, I found just one file blowing in the wind outside: pages and pages of handwritten letters between the court of Sherif Hussein of Mecca-who started the Arab revolt against the Turks for Lawrence of Arabiaand the Ottoman rulers of Baghdad.
And the Americans did nothing. …
always in Fisk’s writing this tension between the descriptions of historic shia/sunni animus and the provocation of such conflict by the americans and the demand by fisk the americans do “something” about saddam, about chaos, etc.–this tension between a brutalized people who need liberation and an abstract dignity of “iraqis” time and again betrayed by interreligious hatred, is not resolved by fisky.
finally, this:
Everywhere are the signs of collapse. And everywhere the signs that America’s promises of “freedom” and “democracy” are not to be hon [994] oured … Here’s what Baghdadis are noticing-and what Iraqis are noticing in all the major cities of the country. Take the vast security apparatus with which Saddam surrounded himself, the torture chambers and the huge bureaucracy which was its foundation. President Bush promised that America was campaigning for human rights in Iraq, that the guilty, the war criminals, would be tracked down and brought to trial. Now the 6o secret police headquarters in Baghdad are empty; even the three-square-mile compound headquarters of the Iraqi Intelligence Service. I have been to many of them. But not a single British or American officer has visited the sites to sift through the wealth of documents lying there or talk to the exprisoners who are themselves visiting their former places of torment. Is this through idleness. Or is this wilful?
…
… Then there’s the fires that have consumed every one of the city’s ministries-save, of course, for the Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Oil-along with UN offices, embassies and shopping malls. I have counted a total of 35 ministries now gutted by fire and the number goes on rising. Take the scene played out on Wednesday. I was driving through Baghdad when I saw a vast column of black smoke staining the horizon. So I headed to see which ministry was left to burn. I found myself at the Ministry of Oil, assiduously guarded by U.S. troops, some of whom were holding clothes over their mouths because of the clouds of smoke swirling down on them from the neighbouring Ministry of Agricultural Irrigation. Hard to believe, isn’t it, that they were unaware that someone was setting fire to the next building?
Then I spotted another fire, just lit, three kilometres away. I drove to the scene to find flames curling out of all the windows of the Ministry of Higher Education’s Department of Computer Science. And right next to it, perched on a wall, was a U.S. Marine, who said he was guarding a neighbouring hospital and didn’t know who had lit the next door fire because “you can’t look everywhere at once.” Now I’m sure the marine was not being facetious or dishonest-should the Americans not believe this story, he was Corporal Ted Nyholm of the 3rd Regiment, 4th Marines and, yes, I called his fianc6e Jessica in the States for him to pass on his love-but something is terribly wrong when American soldiers are ordered to simply watch vast government ministries being burned by mobs and do nothing about it.
Because there is also something very dangerous-and deeply disturbing-about the crowds setting light to the buildings of Baghdad, including the great libraries and state archives. For they are not the looters. The loot ers come first. The arsonists turn up afterwards, often in blue and white single-decker buses. I actually followed one of them after its passengers had set the Ministry of Trade on fire and it sped out of town. Now the official American line on all this is that the looting is revenge-an explanation that is growing very thin-and that the fires are started by “remnants of Saddam’s regime,” the same “criminal elements,” no doubt, who feature in the Marines’ curfew orders to the people of Baghdad.
But people in Baghdad don’t believe Saddam’s former supporters are starting these fires. And neither do I. True, Saddam might have liked Baghdad to end in Gotterdammerung-and might have been tempted to turn it into a city of fire before the Americans entered. But afterwards? The looters make money from their rampages. But the arsonists don’t make money by burning. They have to be paid. The passengers in those buses are clearly being directed to their targets. If Saddam had pre-paid them, they wouldn’t have started the fires. The moment Saddam disappeared, they would have pocketed the money and forgotten the whole project, not wasted their time earning their cash post-payment.
So who are they, this army of arsonists? Again, we don’t know. I recognised one the other day, a middle-aged, unshaven man in a red T-shirtyou can’t change clothes too often when you have no water to wash in-and the second time he saw me he pointed a Kalashnikov rifle at me. Looters don’t carry guns. So what was he frightened of? Who was he working for? In whose interest is it-now, after the American occupation of Baghdad-to destroy the entire physical infrastructure of the state, along with its cultural heritage? Why didn’t the Americans stop this?
As I said, something is going terribly wrong here in Baghdad and something is going on which demands that serious questions be asked of the United States government. Why, for example, did Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld claim last week that there was no widespread looting or destruction in Baghdad? His statement was a lie. But why did he make it? The Americans say they don’t have enough troops to control the fires. This is also untrue. If they don’t, what are the hundreds of troops deployed in the gardens of the old Iran-Iraq war memorial doing all day? Or the hundreds camped in the rose gardens of the Presidential Palace near the Jumhuriya Bridge?
So the people of Baghdad are asking who is behind the destruction of their cultural heritage-their very cultural identity-in the looting of the archaeological treasures from the national museum, the burning of the entire Ottoman, Royal and State archives and the Koranic library and the vast infrastructure of the nation we claim we are going to create for them. Why, they ask, do they still have no electricity and no water? In [998] whose interest is it for Iraq to be deconstructed, divided, burned, dehistoried, destroyed? Why are they issued with orders for a curfew of millions of people by their so-called liberators? … It’s easy for a reporter to predict doom, especially after a brutal war which lacked all international legimitacy. But catastrophe usually waits for optimists in the Middle East, especially for those who are false optimists and invade oil-rich nations with ideological excuses and high-flown moral claims and accusations like weapons of mass destruction which have still been unproved. So I’ll make an awful prediction. That America’s war of “liberation” is over. Iraq’s war of liberation from the Americans is about to begin. In other words, the real and frightening story starts now.
the insinuation here is that the americans sought “cultural destruction” in order to divide & rule.
the truth, based on books like fiasco and emerald city, is the entire “liberation” was managed incompetently.
Posted by: slothrop | May 20 2007 17:38 utc | 27
and, speaking of propaganda, this AFP wire article is full of it
Somali president warns of terrorist threat
grabs your attention, eh?
The Somali president has warned that “terrorists” were threatening his shattered country’s security and slammed international donors for failing to help as promised, in an interview with Agence France-Presse.
An Ethiopian-backed government offensive in Mogadishu last month ended weeks of clashes with Islamist-led insurgents that killed hundreds of civilians and forced tens of thousands to flee, but sporadic attacks are again on the increase.
the president and his unpopular imposed govt, the TFG, are the real terrorists, if, by terrorism, we mean violence used against civilians to force political objectives. but you won’t find that out in this AFP article, which may as well have been crafted in a thinktank somewhere in addis ababa, nairobi, or djibouti.
the “offensive” was not “ethiopian-backed” nor were they clashes. as my coverage has clearly shown over the past months, this was an aggressive invasion by u.s.-backed ethiopian forces to restore the warlords that had terrorized the citizens of somalia over the years up to the rise of the islamic courts union, which (temporarily) drove the warlords and their faux-government out of power. while there were indeed “clashes” between the ethiopian/TFG forces and militias loyal to the ICU, egregious war crimes were committed by the ethiopian forces as they deliberately shelled entire neighborhoods in mogadishu, indiscriminately & w/ complete disregard for human lives.
souding suspiciously similiar to the talking points being circulated out the ethiopian govt’s propaganda offices, the AFP article states that “hundreds of civilians” were killed when even the UN has declared that more than 1500 were killed in the latest multi-day fighting. before that, there were other battles in which more civilians were killed. and it is unknown how many civilians were killed in the initial invasion at the end of last year.
the AFP article also states that these battles “forced tens of thousands to flee” while it is generally accepted that up to 1/3rd of the population of mogadishu — between 350,000 to half-a-million people — fled the city to avoid the atrocities being committed by the ethiopians & the TFG. now, if that is not clearly terrorism, tell me what is.
“My government was battling terrorists who lost their strongholds militarily in Mogadishu, but they are still at large by hiding in the towns and villages,” Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed said late on Sunday at his official residence, Villa Somalia, which has been a target of mortar attacks.
“We don’t believe the threats of terrorists are over as some of them are abroad still planning to create havoc again,” he said.
again, the TFG is largely unpopular, as even pointed out by the italian deputy foreign minister, who recently visited and stated that “I believe the transitional government can not perform its duties due to lack of local support.”
as for villa somalia, the presidential palace of which AFP tells it readers “has been a target of mortar attacks,” it served as a base for ethiopian forces and uganda’s peacekeeping troops — occupying armies, let us not forget — from which much of the indiscriminate shelling of civilian neighborhoods was launched, which is why it was a target of the resistance. but, i suppose, that is not something that readers need to know.
Four Ugandan peacekeepers from an African Union force were killed in a bomb attack on their convoy last week, and the prime minister and mayor of Mogadishu both escaped unharmed from roadside bomb attacks in recent days.
Yusuf, who was elected president in 2004, also launched a scathing attack on international donors for failing to provide more help.
the deaths of the ugandan forces is being spun heavily, as i have already pointed out. the new u.s. envoy to somalia wasted no time to shout fire (AQ) in a loaded press conference. yet, the ugandan govt has publicly announced that AQ had nothing to do w/ the attacks. they are not willing to use their dead to further such propaganda.
nest, while it may be possible to state that yusuf was “elected president in 2004,” it’s pure misinformation to present that stmt as it appears in the article. he was appointed & elected to head the TFG by his fellow warlords (and foreign agents), but it is deliberately misleading to imply that he was elected as president of somalia by the citizens of somalia. on this point alone, the article could be qualified as propaganda, imo.
that yusuf, in AFP’s words, “launched a scathing attack on international donors” is not surprising, given his history as a hated warlord & his role in the war crimes committed in somalia this year.
“The outside world promised a reconstruction plan with a full package to develop the lives of Somalis in war-torn Somalia but efforts of the international community are confined to meagre humanitarian work,” he said.
“The United States is appreciating our struggle against terrorism but did not give any tangible assistance to reconstruct a devastated nation. Even the United Nations has yet to take drastic action to assist to rebuild Somalia,” he added.
“I don’t know what is true and what is false when it concerns the international community. I don’t appreciate hypocrisy.”
For their part, international aid groups say they are struggling to deliver vital food and supplies to the tens of thousands displaced by recent fighting in Mogadishu because of continued insecurity.
so now yusuf is attacking his ‘friends’ who helped attempt to restore him to power for misleading him. meanwhile, humanitarian groups & NGO’s are complaining b/c of the obstacles that the TFG is throwing up to prevent the delivery of aid to what one UN official, holmes, called the biggest humanitarian crisis in the world right now. the TFG has been accused of stealing supplies, confiscating food, etc.
and yusuf whines to the AFP that he doesn’t “appreciate” hypocrisy.
well, i’m sure he appreciates the public relations boost he gets from drivel like this piece from AFP. still won’t help strengthen the TFG’s precarious hold on mogadishu, though, or build up any real legitimacy for them.
Posted by: b real | May 21 2007 19:46 utc | 58
|